DNA sequence polymorphisms within the bovine guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs subunit alpha (Gsα)-encoding (GNAS) genomic imprinting domain are associated with performance traits
© Sikora et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 26 May 2010
Accepted: 7 January 2011
Published: 7 January 2011
Genes which are epigenetically regulated via genomic imprinting can be potential targets for artificial selection during animal breeding. Indeed, imprinted loci have been shown to underlie some important quantitative traits in domestic mammals, most notably muscle mass and fat deposition. In this candidate gene study, we have identified novel associations between six validated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning a 97.6 kb region within the bovine guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs subunit alpha gene (GNAS) domain on bovine chromosome 13 and genetic merit for a range of performance traits in 848 progeny-tested Holstein-Friesian sires. The mammalian GNAS domain consists of a number of reciprocally-imprinted, alternatively-spliced genes which can play a major role in growth, development and disease in mice and humans. Based on the current annotation of the bovine GNAS domain, four of the SNPs analysed (rs43101491, rs43101493, rs43101485 and rs43101486) were located upstream of the GNAS gene, while one SNP (rs41694646) was located in the second intron of the GNAS gene. The final SNP (rs41694656) was located in the first exon of transcripts encoding the putative bovine neuroendocrine-specific protein NESP55, resulting in an aspartic acid-to-asparagine amino acid substitution at amino acid position 192.
SNP genotype-phenotype association analyses indicate that the single intronic GNAS SNP (rs41694646) is associated (P ≤ 0.05) with a range of performance traits including milk yield, milk protein yield, the content of fat and protein in milk, culled cow carcass weight and progeny carcass conformation, measures of animal body size, direct calving difficulty (i.e. difficulty in calving due to the size of the calf) and gestation length. Association (P ≤ 0.01) with direct calving difficulty (i.e. due to calf size) and maternal calving difficulty (i.e. due to the maternal pelvic width size) was also observed at the rs43101491 SNP. Following adjustment for multiple-testing, significant association (q ≤ 0.05) remained between the rs41694646 SNP and four traits (animal stature, body depth, direct calving difficulty and milk yield) only. Notably, the single SNP in the bovine NESP55 gene (rs41694656) was associated (P ≤ 0.01) with somatic cell count--an often-cited indicator of resistance to mastitis and overall health status of the mammary system--and previous studies have demonstrated that the chromosomal region to where the GNAS domain maps underlies an important quantitative trait locus for this trait. This association, however, was not significant after adjustment for multiple testing. The three remaining SNPs assayed were not associated with any of the performance traits analysed in this study. Analysis of all pairwise linkage disequilibrium (r2) values suggests that most allele substitution effects for the assayed SNPs observed are independent. Finally, the polymorphic coding SNP in the putative bovine NESP55 gene was used to test the imprinting status of this gene across a range of foetal bovine tissues.
Previous studies in other mammalian species have shown that DNA sequence variation within the imprinted GNAS gene cluster contributes to several physiological and metabolic disorders, including obesity in humans and mice. Similarly, the results presented here indicate an important role for the imprinted GNAS cluster in underlying complex performance traits in cattle such as animal growth, calving, fertility and health. These findings suggest that GNAS domain-associated polymorphisms may serve as important genetic markers for future livestock breeding programs and support previous studies that candidate imprinted loci may act as molecular targets for the genetic improvement of agricultural populations. In addition, we present new evidence that the bovine NESP55 gene is epigenetically regulated as a maternally expressed imprinted gene in placental and intestinal tissues from 8-10 week old bovine foetuses.
Genomic imprinting is a form of epigenetic regulation which results in the complete or preferential monoallelic expression of approximately 100 mammalian autosomal genes in a parent-of-origin dependent manner [1–6]. Genes subject to this form of epigenetic control have been shown to play major roles in regulation of mammalian postnatal growth, development, and metabolism. Furthermore, perturbations of the imprinting status of these genes (i.e. loss of imprinting) can result in serious physiological impairments (such as those associated with Angleman syndrome and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome in humans), lethality and susceptibility to diseases such as cancer [7–9].
Imprinted genes are organised into clusters or domains within the mammalian genome, in which both paternally-expressed and maternally-expressed genes (i.e. reciprocally-imprinted genes, including both protein-coding and regulatory non-coding RNAs genes) occur at a higher density than other regions of the genome [10, 11]. One such cluster of imprinted genes is the mammalian GNAS domain which consists of a number of imprinted genes which display complex transcriptional and epigenetic regulation [12, 13]. In humans, the GNAS domain spans ~70 kilobases (kb) on chromosome 20 and displays similar gene organisation and imprinting patterns to the orthologous Gnas domain on murine chromosome 2 . An integral member of this domain is the GNAS gene which encodes the alpha-stimulatory subunit of the trimeric guanine nucleotide-binding (or G-protein, GSα). G-proteins are involved in both the coupling of many hormone and neurotransmitter receptor proteins to adenylate cyclase and also the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) for downstream cellular signal transduction pathways . The human GNAS gene, transcribed from the GSα promoter, consists of 13 exons (the mouse gene model contains 12 exons) and is predominantly biallelically expressed, except in a subset of cells and tissues--including proximal renal tubule cells, thyroid and anterior pituitary glands and ovaries--where preferential expression of the maternally inherited allele is observed . Maternal-specific expression has also been documented in neonatal adipose tissues, while the reporting of biallelic expression in adult human adipose tissue suggests that imprinting of GNAS is both tissue- and developmental-stage specific .
Other mRNAs produced within the mammalian GNAS domain include the reciprocally-imprinted GNASxl and NESP55 transcripts, both of which are generated through the use of alternative promoters and first exons that splice to the common exon 2 of the GNAS gene . The paternally-expressed GNASxl transcript encodes the GSα isoform, XLαS ('extralarge GSα'), and is synthesised via alternative splicing of the XLαS exon (located ~32.5 kb upstream of the GSα promoter) to exons 2-13 of the GNAS gene . The maternally-expressed neuroendocrine-specific NESP55 transcript is produced by the splicing of the NESP exon (located ~45.7 kb upstream of the GSα promoter) and GNAS exons 2-12. NESP55 transcripts encode a 55 kDa neuroendocrine secretory, chromogranin-like protein of unknown function . The entire coding region of the NESP55 protein is located within the NESP exon while GNAS exons 2-13 constitute the 3'UTR of NESP55 transcripts .
Recently, a number of studies have highlighted the relationship between the GNAS imprinting domain and the development of disease in both mice and humans. For example, genetic perturbations within the GNAS domain, such as point mutations and duplication/deletion of maternally- or paternally-inherited alleles, can result in physiological dysfunction, such as reduced body size, hypermetabolism, obesity, mental retardation or neonatal lethality [16, 20–24]. Such findings support a major functional role for the GNAS domain in regulating mammalian growth and maturation.
Based on the known physiological role of the imprinted GNAS domain in regulating mammalian growth and development, we have adopted a candidate gene strategy by assessing associations between six bovine GNAS domain SNPs and genetic merit for a range of economically-important performance traits in 848 progeny-tested Holstein-Friesian sires. The candidate gene approach uses variation in genes of known biological function relevant to the trait(s) of interest to investigate genotype-phenotype associations, and is regarded as a viable alternative to whole genome scans for the detection and characterisation of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for complex performance traits [25–27]. Furthermore, in support of our approach, recent investigations have shown that known or candidate imprinted loci (based on the imprinting status of orthologous genes from other mammalian species) can underlie important QTL for complex performance traits in livestock, including animal growth and development [28–36], fat deposition , meat traits , milk traits [39, 40] and fertility traits . In addition, other recent studies have considered the effect of genetic imprinting on quantitative traits in managed populations [42, 43].
In cattle, the GNAS domain is located on Bos taurus chromosome 13 (BTA13). While there is currently no definitive evidence demonstrating that the bovine GNAS locus is imprinted, studies have confirmed that this gene is maternally expressed in parthenogenetic bovine embryos [44, 45]. However, the appreciable evolutionary conservation of imprinting domains across mammalian species, including humans, mouse, sheep, pigs and cattle, suggests that the bovine GNAS locus may also be under similar epigenetic regulation [46–50]. Indeed, preferential maternal expression of the bovine NESP55 gene has been previously reported by Khatib  in foetal tissue samples. In the current study, while we could not test for imprinting of the GNAS gene (due to lack of expressed, coding SNPs), we could validate and extend the preferential maternal expression of the bovine NESP55 gene to a wider range of tissues at earlier stages of development to tissues screened in previous studies .
NESP55 is epigenetically regulated as a maternally expressed imprinted gene in 8-10 week old bovine foetal tissues
To determine the imprinting status of the bovine GNAS and NESP55 genes, exonic and UTR SNPs reported in Build 4.0 of the B. taurus genome assembly within the ENSEMBL database http://www.ensembl.org were catalogued and subsequently validated via direct bi-directional sequencing of high-fidelity polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplicons from genomic DNA using a panel of foetal and dam samples. In this study each of the three predicted gene models for GNAS in the cattle genome were considered [ENSEMBL database transcript IDs ENSBTAT00000002746 encodes the bovine GNAS transcript, ENSBTAT00000023246 encodes the alternatively spliced transcript termed GNAS2_BOVIN and ENSBTAT00000023234 encodes a novel alternatively spliced GNAS transcript]. While the ENSEMBL database reports one SNP (rs41255672) in the 3'UTR of GNAS, our sequencing of PCR amplicons generated from genomic DNA isolated from 10 different animals (using amplicons spanning exons 7 to 14 of the bovine GNAS locus) failed to detect a heterozygous SNPs that would allow for a test of GNAS imprinting in tissue samples derived from each animal (results not shown).
Allele and genotype frequencies for the six GNAS domain SNPs analysed in 848 progeny-tested Irish Holstein-Friesian sires
Summary statistics for the GNAS domain SNPs analysed in this study across 848 Holstein-Friesian sires
Open reading frame (ORF) model position of SNP
SNP location/dbSNP accession number
Minor allele frequency
Deviations from HWE (P-value)
Upstream of the GNAS gene
Upstream of the GNAS gene
Upstream of the GNAS gene
Upstream of the GNAS gene
Intron 2 of the GNAS gene
Intron 1 of the putative NESP55 gene
An intronic SNP located between exon 2 and 3 of the bovine GNAS gene is associated with a range of production traits in cattle
Estimated allele substitution effect (standard error in parenthesis) between six SNPs in the bovine GNAS domain and milk performance, somatic cell count (SCC), calving and fertility traits
Milk yield (kg)
Milk protein yield (kg)
Milk fat content1 (%×100)
Milk protein content1 (%×100)
Direct calving difficulty2
Maternal calving difficulty2
Estimated allele substitution effects (standard error in parenthesis) of six SNPs in the bovine GNAS domain on growth performance and size
Culled cow carcass weight (kg)
Progeny carcass conformation1 (×100)
Progeny carcass fat2 (×100)
Body depth3 (×10)
SNPs within the GNAS locus are associated with reproduction traits in domestic cattle
In addition to associations with milk, carcass and body size traits, the rs41694646 SNP was also associated with a range of calving traits, including direct calving difficulty due to the size of offspring [i.e. a sire effect on calving difficulty] (P ≤ 0.001) and gestation length (P ≤ 0.01). Association between this SNP and direct calving difficulty remaining after adjustment for multiple testing (q ≤ 0.05). This SNP also tended to be associated (P ≤ 0.10) with maternal calving difficulty (i.e. due to the size of the maternal pelvic width) and perinatal mortality (a C-to-G substitution at this locus results in 0.17% decrease in the rate of perinatal mortality [standard error ± 0.10%])--no other SNP analysed in this study was associated with perinatal mortality. Significant associations with direct calving difficulty due to offspring size (P ≤ 0.01) and maternal calving difficulty (P ≤ 0.01) were also observed at the rs43101491 SNP, which is located 14.2 kb upstream of the GNAS gene; however these associations were no longer significant after adjustment for multiple-testing. No significant associations were observed between any of the above-listed traits and the remaining three SNPs located upstream of the GNAS gene (i.e. rs43101491, rs43101486, rs43101485).
A non-synonymous SNP within the NESP55 cattle gene model is associated with somatic cell count
The single assayed SNP within the putative bovine NESP55 transcript (rs41694656) displayed no significant associations with any of the milk production, carcass, body conformation or calving traits analysed but it was associated (P ≤ 0.01) with somatic cell count. However, association with somatic cell count no longer remained after adjustment for multiple testing. Sequence alignment indicates that this SNP lies within the first exon of putative maternally expressed NESP55 transcript (GenBank accession U77614.1); the NESP55 exon is situated ~89.9 kb upstream of the first GSα exon. The G-to-A nucleotide substitution at this locus results in a non-synonymous aspartic acid-to-asparagine amino acid substitution at amino acid position 192 in the NESP55 protein .
SNPs within or proximal to the bovine GNAS gene and their association with cattle performance traits
Candidate gene studies, whereby DNA sequence polymorphisms are pre-selected for analysis based on their proximity to genes/loci known (or considered likely) to play a role in regulating a phenotype of interest, are considered as viable alternatives to genome-wide association (GWA) studies . Such approaches are also regarded as having the added advantage of reducing both the number of false-positive genotype-phenotype associations (i.e. spurious associations detected due to chance) and false-negative genotype-phenotype associations (i.e. true associations that are erroneously rejected as a result of rigorous conventional statistical testing) commonly encountered during GWA studies [25, 26, 56, 57].
In the present study, we have adopted a candidate gene approach by analysing DNA sequence variation in the bovine GNAS imprinting domain and a number of economically-important performance traits in cattle. In humans and mice, this domain consists of a number of reciprocally-imprinted and alternatively spliced genes and has been shown to have an important relationship with mammalian growth, development and disease in these species [12, 16, 22]. While the GNAS gene, which is integral to this domain, is preferentially maternally expressed in humans and mice, the current imprinting status of the bovine ortholog of GNAS has not yet been conclusively defined [44, 45]. However, the degree of imprinting conservation between mammalian species suggests that this gene may also be epigenetically regulated in cattle [46, 47]. Indeed, the bovine NESP55 gene which lies upstream of the bovine GNAS gene has previously been shown to be a maternally expressed imprinted gene by Khatib  and also by us in the current study, the evidence for which is discussed below.
Genotype-phenotype association analysis performed in the current study identified a number of statistically significant associations (P ≤ 0.05) between SNPs distributed across the orthologous bovine GNAS domain and a number of cattle growth and development, milk, calving and health traits. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies demonstrating that DNA sequence variation within the GNAS domain underlies quantitative phenotypic traits in cattle. These associations are most aptly demonstrated by the rs41694646 SNP located within the 2nd intron of the bovine GNAS transcript. Notably, this SNP was associated with, (1) animal growth and development (as illustrated by associations with animal stature, body depth, culled cow carcass weight, progeny carcass conformation and progeny carcass fat deposition), (2) fertility (as illustrated by associations with gestation length), (3) milk production (as illustrated by associations with milk yield, milk protein yield, and milk fat and protein content), and (4) calving (as illustrated by associations with direct calving difficulty). In addition, the rs43101491 SNP located upstream of the GNAS gene was also associated with the two calving traits analysed here. It should be noted that significant associations between the rs41694646 SNP and animal stature, body depth, direct calving difficulty and milk yield remained after correction for multiple-testing (q ≤ 0.05).
The phenotypic associations with SNP variation in the GNAS domain detected in this study are supported by genetic analysis of the GNAS domain in other mammalian species. Genetic defects within the human GNAS domain can cause similar physiological defects to those observed in knockout mice strains. Heterozygous mutations disrupting expression from the GSα promoter display symptoms characteristic of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) including short stature, bracydactyly and neurological defects. In addition, maternal-specific inheritance of mutations in the GNAS gene can result in severe obesity and resistance to growth-regulating hormones. Alternatively, paternally-derived mutations in GSα promoter-generated transcripts do not lead to development of obesity or multi-hormonal resistance reflecting the paternal-silencing of this promoter [16, 58].
In mice, paternally- and maternally-inherited null mutations associated within the Gnas gene cluster results in severe, albeit different, developmental and disease phenotypes. For example, heterozygous mice carrying maternally-derived knockout mutations within exon 2 of the Gnas gene (an exon common to all transcripts produced within the Gnas domain) display severe obesity, increased insulin sensitivity and increased perinatal mortality, while heterozygotes carrying a paternally-derived exon 2 knockout mutations (indicative of a loss of Gnasxl transcripts) also displayed increased perinatal mortality, greatly increased insulin sensitivity, hypermetabolism and reduced adiposity; homozygous individuals were embryonically lethal [59–61]. Furthermore, a missense mutation in Gnas exon 6 (referred to as the Oed-Sml mutation) causes post-natal growth retardation when paternally-inherited in heterozygotes; when maternally-inherited in heterozygotes this mutation result in marked subcutaneous oedema, obesity and increased neonatal mortality . Collectively, these lines of evidence have led to suggestions that the XLαS isoform (encoded by the Gnasxl) functions to promote growth and increase lipid/fat content and metabolism during development, while the function of the GSα protein is to reduce growth, fat mass and metabolism during development . Notably, the bovine GNAS SNPs assayed in this study showed similar phenotypic effects on growth and fat deposition. Although no significant associations with calf perinatal mortality was observed, there was an observed tendency for the rs41694646 SNP to be associated with this trait. Indeed, the observed association between the intronic rs41694646 SNP and the effect of the sire on calving difficulty may possibly be due to foetal growth effects on calving success.
The association of the GNAS imprinting locus with progeny carcass fat deposition in cattle is intriguing as it resonates with proposed theories for imprinting evolution of genes controlling non-shivering thermogenesis in animal species (such as cattle and other domestic animals) that display huddling behaviour [64, 65]. Young mammals generate heat through non-shivering thermogenesis and conserve heat loss through social thermoregulation (huddling) [66–68]. In this regard, GNAS has been highlighted as a gene that produces both a maternally expressed promoter and a paternally expressed inhibitor of non-shivering thermogenesis, which is proposed to lead to an intragenomic conflict driving imprinting at the GNAS domain [64, 65].
A recent molecular evolutionary analysis of 34 mammalian imprinted genes by our group found that GNASxl is only one of two imprinted transcripts/genes (the other being OSBPL5) which displays site-specific positive Darwinian selection consistent with the parental conflict theory for evolution of imprinted genes [69, 70]. In addition, the biochemical evidence from studies of the GNAS-derived gene products in humans and mice is often cited as support for the parental conflict or kinship theory for the evolution of imprinting. This theory proposes that paternally-expressed imprinted genes can act in the developing offspring to recruit biological resources from the mother and hence promote offspring growth, whereas maternally-expressed genes act to restrict demand on maternal biological resources by inhibiting offspring growth . Phenotypes associated with disruptions of the imprinted GNAS locus have been particularly highlighted as supporting evidence for the parental conflict theory for the evolution of imprinting [64, 65, 71]. While a similar scenario in cattle is tempting to speculate given the observed associations with growth at the bovine GNAS gene in this study, determining the relative phenotypic contributions from maternally- and paternally-derived alleles at the rs41694646 SNP was not feasible as the association analysis presented here was not conducted across a structured, multi-generational population with known ancestral relationships. However, based on the results presented in the current study the use of this SNP in future QTL mapping studies using structured, multi-generational populations may allow for some testing of the parental conflict theory in relation to the GNAS gene-derived transcripts in livestock.
Genotype-phenotype association analysis between the a non-synonymous NESP55 SNP and somatic cell count
The NESP55 transcript is produced by the splicing of the first NESP exon and GSα exons 2-13; however, the entire NESP55 coding sequence is contained within its first exon with GSα exons 2-13 forming the 3'UTR of NESP55 transcripts. This transcript encodes the NESP55 protein which consists of 241 amino acids and is an acidic, soluble heat-stable chromogranin-like protein localised within large dense core granules of secretory cells [19, 72, 73]. Although NESP55 is expressed in a wide range of human and murine tissues (especially neuroendocrine tissue including adrenal medulla, pituitary and hypothalmus) its function remains unknown . While gene knockout studies in mice have shown that elimination of maternally-derived NESP55 transcripts do not affect post-natal development, altered behavioural reactivity to novel environments were observed .
Regardless of the function of its encoded gene product, the observed association between the rs41694656 SNP and somatic cell count (SCC) is noteworthy. The SCC phenotype reflects the number of leukocytes per millilitre of milk and is an indicator of clinical and sub-clinical mastitis in cattle. Clinical mastitis is the most frequent cause of involuntary culling in North American dairy herds costing the US dairy industry an estimated $2 billion annually [75–78]. Both SCC and clinical mastitis are strongly positively correlated and therefore selection for reduced SCC, either through quantitative genetics or molecular genetics means, is expected to, on average, reduce the incidence of mastitis [79, 80]. Recently, a microsatellite-based whole genome scan identified a BTA13 as harbouring a QTL for SCC in Danish Holstein cattle . Notably, this QTL was located in the genomic region encompassing the GNAS domain. Given the significant association observed between the NESP55 SNP and SCC in the current study, it is possible that the NESP55 gene underlies this QTL for SCC or is linked to another genetic locus that is associated with this trait.
The G-to-A substitution at the rs41694656 SNP located within the NESP55 gene represents the only coding sequence polymorphism analysed in this study, and results in a non-synonymous aspartic acid to asparagine codon substitution at amino acid position 192 of the NESP55 protein. However, given the similar biochemical properties between these two amino acids (both are small polar amino acids) it seems unlikely that this SNP is causal for the SCC phenotypic effect observed in this study. Rather, it is more plausible to suggest that this SNP is associated through LD with causal regulatory mutations (or set of mutations) located proximal to, or within the bovine NESP55 gene that have not yet been identified.
It is important to note that while many QTL scans for performance traits (using multi-generation resource populations with known pedigree structure) have incorporated imprinting effects in their statistical model [82–84], this was not possible in the current study as the DNA samples used were derived from progeny-tested Holstein-Friesian sires. While the association of variation in a domain containing maternally expressed imprinted genes (i.e. NESP55 and possibly GNAS in cattle) with phenotypic data derived from progeny-tested sires seems somewhat incongruent, this can possibly be explained by the fact that the genetic merit for each of traits examined here is calculated from many descendents across multiple generations (with female intermediaries). Therefore, variation in sire-derived maternally expressed imprinted genes could still be associated with performance.
Imprinting of the bovine NESP55 gene
To date, NESP55 is the only transcript within the GNAS domain complex which has been shown to be imprinted in cattle exhibiting a maternally expressed pattern of genomic imprinting . Our results further indicate that NESP55 remains imprinted across many tissues of earlier stage foetuses (e.g. 8 week) than previously analysed (i.e. from 10-13 week old foetuses ) (Figure 1 and 2). In addition, we demonstrate that NESP55 is also epigenetically regulated as a maternally expressed imprinted gene in intestinal and placental samples (cotyledon) of the 8-10 day old foetal offspring (Figure 1 and 2).
Overall, our results provide evidence that DNA sequence variation within the bovine GNAS imprinting domain is associated with a number of performance traits in domestic cattle. We also provide additional evidence (to earlier reports) indicating that the NESP55 gene in this domain is a maternally expressed imprinted gene in foetuses as early as 8 weeks old. This lends further support to the accumulating body of research indicating that imprinted genes (and the complex imprinting cluster domains they reside in) can harbour important quantitative trait loci for economically-relevant performance traits in domestic livestock species. These observations increase support for the inclusion of imprinted loci (and their associated DNA sequence polymorphisms) as molecular markers for future domestic animal improvement strategies.
Analysis of NESP55 expression
A. Foetal tissue samples collection
Foetal samples were collected from two abattoirs: (a) the Kildare Chilling Company (Kildare town, County Kildare, Ireland), and (b) Meadow Meats (Rathdowney, County Laois, Ireland). Upon collection the foetuses were immediately chilled on ice. After dissection, the obtained tissues were submerged in an appropriate volume of RNAlater® solution (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). In total, 10 foetuses ranging from 6-10 weeks old (based on the crown-rump length of the foetus) were collected. The tissues were kept at 4°C overnight, then the RNAlater® solution was removed and tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.
B. RNA extraction from foetal tissue
Total RNA was extracted using RNAqueous® Kit (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) following the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 75 mg of the frozen sample was removed and homogenised in 750 μl lysis buffer (supplied with the RNAqueous® Kit) using a hand electric homogeniser. The lysate was then mixed with 750 μl of 64% v/v ethanol by inverting the tube several times. The lysate/ethanol mixture was applied to a filter cartridge supplied with the kit and centrifuged at 13,000×g for one minute. The flow-through was discarded and the cartridge was washed with a 700 μl of Wash Solution 1 and subsequently with 500 μl Wash Solution 2 and 3 (supplied with the RNAqueous® Kit). Upon the addition of each appropriate solution the tubes were centrifuged at 13,000×g for one minute and the flow through was discarded. Total RNA was eluted twice with 50 μl of DNAse- and RNAse-free water, divided into aliquots, and quantified using a NanoDrop™ ND1000 spectrophotometer V 3.5.2 (Thermo Scientific Ltd., Wilmington, DE, USA). To validate RNA integrity two volumes of formaldehyde-based loading dye was added to each RNA sample and analysed on 1% agarose gel in 1× TBE after ethidium bromide staining.
C. cDNA synthesis
cDNA synthesis reactions were carried out using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen Ltd. Crawley, UK) following the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 1 μg of total RNA in 12 μl RNAse-free water was mixed with 2 μl of genomic DNA (gDNA) Wipeout Buffer and incubated for 5 min at 42°C. The reaction mixture was then cooled on ice and 6 μl of reverse transcription master mix containing 1 μl of the Quantiscript® reverse transcriptase enzyme (Qiagen Ltd. Crawley, UK), 1 μl of reverse transcription primer mix and 1× Quantiscript reverse transcription buffer was added to each RNA sample. The reaction was incubated at 42°C for 30 min and subsequently the reverse transcriptase enzyme was inactivated by placing the samples for 3 min in 95°C. cDNA samples were diluted 1:4 for further analysis.
D. gDNA PCR amplification, RT-PCR amplification and sequencing of NESP55 amplification products
PCR amplifications of gDNA for DNA sequence analysis were performed in 50 μl volume. RT-PCR amplifications were performed in 20 μl volume. PCR primers used for gDNA amplifications were located in the single NESP55 coding exon (forward primer sequence: 5'-AGTCCGAGACCGAATTCG-3'; reverse primer sequence: 5'-CATTAGCTGAGCCGGATGG-3'), while PCR primers for cDNA amplification were located in the NESP55 coding exon (forward primer sequence: 5'-AGTCCGAGACCGAATTCG-3') and exon 6 of the bovine GNAS gene (reverse primer sequence: 5'-CGTTGGAGCGCTCATAGCAG-3'), respectively. Each PCR reaction included 20 ng of DNA or cDNA; 0.4 μM of each primer; 1× Green GoTaq® Flexi Buffer (Promega Ltd., Ireland); 0.25 mM of each dNTP (Sigma Aldrich Ltd., Ireland) and 0.4 Units of GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega Ltd., Ireland). MgCl2 solution was added to each PCR at a final concentration of 2.5 mM. For all PCR amplifications, an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C was followed by 35 cycles of a 3-step amplification programme of 30 sec at 95°C for denaturation, 30 sec at 60°C for annealing and 1 min at 72°C for extension. The final extension step was performed after 35 cycles of the above process at 72°C for 5 minutes. All content of each PCR reaction was loaded on a 1% w/v agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma Aldrich Ltd., Ireland) in 1× TBE buffer and visualised under UV light. All sequencing reactions were performed commercially by GATC Biotech Ltd. (Constance, Germany) using the primer sequences listed above and resulting DNA sequence traces were analysed using the LaserGene Package (DNASTAR, WI, USA).
SNP genotype-phenotype association analysis
A. Bovine GNAS domain sequence analysis and SNP validation
Two alternatively spliced transcripts have described for the currently annotated bovine GNAS gene (ENSEMBL gene ID ENSBTAG00000017475) in the ENSEMBL database (http://www.ensembl.org, ENSEMBL release 60, November 2010). These are: (a) the GNAS transcript (ENSEMBL transcript ID ENSBTAT00000002746) which consists of eight translated exons and one untranslated exon and encodes a 253 amino acid protein, and (b) the GNAS2_BOVIN transcript (ENSEMBL transcript ID ENSBTAT00000023246) which consists of 16 translated exons encoding a 350 amino acid protein. The final eight translated exons of the GNAS2_BOVIN transcript represent the first eight translated exons of the GNAS transcript (Figure 3). A novel transcript (ENSEMBL transcript ID ENSBTAT00000002746) consisting of all alternatively spliced GNAS and GNAS2_BOVIN exons together with additional exon sequences has also been reported in the ENSEMBL database.
The methods used to validate DNA sequence polymorphisms for genotyping within the bovine GNAS domain have been discussed in detail elsewhere . Briefly, high-fidelity PCR amplicons spanning putative SNPs within the bovine GNAS region on BTA13 as per Build 4.0 of the bovine genome in the ENSEMBL database were generated for a panel of 26 animals (comprising European Bos taurus, African B. taurus and Indian B. indicus animals) and sequenced bi-directionally (Macrogen Inc., Korea; http://www.macrogen.com). The MEGA 4.0 software package  was used to analyse all resulting DNA sequences and to confirm the presence of SNPs. In the current study, we used six validated GNAS domain SNPs (three transitions and three transversions) for high-throughput genotyping. One SNP (rs41694646) was located within the second intron of the GNAS gene (ENSEMBL gene ID ENSBTAG00000017475; ENSEMBL transcript ID ENSBTAT00000002746) while four SNPs (rs43101491, rs43101493, rs43101486, rs43101485) were located upstream of the bovine GNAS gene based on the currently annotated open reading frame (ORF) gene model of the GNAS gene.
The final SNP (rs41694656, a G-to-A nucleotide substitution) was located within the first exon of the bovine NESP55 gene. Previously, Khatib  used this SNP to detect imprinting of the bovine NESP55 gene, however given the major advances in bovine genomics resources since then, we confirmed the location of this SNP using a bioinformatics approach. At the time of analysis, the genomic DNA (gDNA) sequence of this gene was not fully annotated within B. taurus reference genome sequence. Instead, the location and gDNA sequence of NESP55 was identified via alignment of the complete NESP55 mRNA sequence (GenBank accession number U77614.1) with Build 4.0 of the bovine genome using the BLAT sequence alignment tool available through the UCSC genome browser http://genome.ucsc.edu. The amino acid sequence of the NESP55 complete transcript carrying the A allele at the rs41694656 SNP was produced using the 'Translate' option on the ExPASy proteomics server http://www.expasy.ch. Alignment of the resulting amino acid sequences revealed that the G-to-A nucleotide substitution at the rs41694656 SNP causes an aspartic acid (codon GAC) to asparagine (codon AAC) at amino acid position 192 of the NESP55 protein, thus confirming the findings of Khatib .
B. DNA samples, DNA extraction, high-throughput SNP genotyping and SNP data filtering
Genomic DNA from 914 progeny-tested Irish Holstein-Friesian sires was purified using a Maxwell™ 16 automated apparatus (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) as per manufacturer's instructions. These sires have been used to produce progeny in Ireland (via artificial insemination) and were representative of the commercial germplasm used in Irish dairy herds in past years. Genotyping for all six GNAS SNPs was performed on all 914 sires together with an additional 25 independently-extracted, duplicate samples that were included for genotype quality control purposes. All SNP genotyping was performed commercially by Sequenom Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA; http://www.sequenom.com using their proprietary MassARRAY iPLEX™ Gold genotyping platform. This SNP genotyping platform discriminates between SNP alleles using single base primer extension technology after which primer extension products are analysed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy http://www.sequenom.com/iplex. Furthermore, this SNP genotyping platform has been validated by us in a previous study .
Genotype quality control and data filtering were performed on all data prior to association analyses. This involved the use of an iterative algorithm to remove SNPs and individuals that yielded poor genotype call rates. Firstly, SNPs with a genotype call rate < 75% across all 914 individuals were removed, followed by the removal of individuals with genotype call rates of < 85% across all remaining SNPs--this resulted in the removal of 21 sires and no SNPs from the study. Secondly, SNPs that yielded genotypes in < 90% of all remaining 893 individuals were discarded followed by the removal individuals that failed to yield a genotype for < 90% of all remaining SNPs--this resulted in the removal of a further 45 sires from the study, while no SNPs were discarded after the second filtering process.
After data filtering, genotypic data for all six SNPs and 848 progeny-tested sires with an average co-ancestry of 2.2% remained. The SNP genotype concordance rate between technical replicate for these SNPs was 100%. Summary statistics for each SNP (including allele and genotype frequencies) and phenotype association analyses were performed using this edited dataset. D' and r2 estimates of linkage disequilibrium (LD) [54, 55] between every pairwise combination of segregating SNPs across the GNAS domain were also generated from this edited dataset using the HAPLOVIEW software package .
C. Phenotypic data and association analyses
A range of phenotypic traits were analysed in this study and were categorised into six broad categories: (1) milk production traits [milk yield, fat yield, protein yield and milk fat and protein concentration], (2) udder health [somatic cell count, SCC], (3) carcass traits [culled cow carcass weight, progeny carcass weight, progeny carcass conformation score and progeny subcutaneous carcass fat level], (4) animal size in live animals [animal stature, body depth, chest width, rump angle and rump width]; (5) subjectively assessed subcutaneous fat level on live animals [angularity and body condition score], and (6) calving traits [calving difficulty (both direct and maternal calving difficulty), gestation length and perinatal mortality]. All phenotypic data were kindly supplied by the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation http://www.icbf.com and a detailed description of all traits is provided in Additional File 2.
The phenotypes used in this study are sire genetic merit based not on data on the sires themselves but on the performance of their female progeny across multiple generations. Using known relationships among animals, performance records on relatives are used to estimate the genetic merit of an animal (i.e. a sire). Systematic environmental effects on the progeny are adjusted for and the random non-genetic variation associated with the progeny's phenotypes is minimised, thus facilitating a more accurate measure of genetic merit. This increased study power is particularly beneficial for low heritability traits where the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to additive genetic differences is low. The disadvantage of such a study design is that the performance traits included for analysis are limited to those routinely measured on progeny. The average number of progeny per sire analysed here was 842 daughter-parity records. When coupled with the mixed model methodology used and the de-regression of the predicted transmitting ability (PTA), this implies that the associations reported herein are independent of pedigree structure.
Sire PTA (i.e. the average genetic merit for a given trait that an animal transmits to its offspring) was the dependent variable for all traits with the exception of the milk production traits, including somatic cell count, which were daughter yield deviations (DYDs, the average of a sire's daughters' performance) expressed on a PTA scale. Models used in genetic evaluations in Ireland, as well as variance components, have been summarised in detail previously . DYDs for 305-day milk, fat and protein yield as well as geometric mean SCC (loge somatic cell count) are estimated in Ireland using a repeatability animal model across the first five lactations. PTAs for calving interval and survival are estimated using a multi-trait animal model, including data from the first three lactations. PTAs for milk yield are used to adjust PTA for survival for differences in genetic merit of milk yield; hence, this survival trait is functional survival. PTAs for cow carcass weight, progeny carcass weight, progeny carcass fat score (scale 1 to 15; Hickey et al. ) and progeny carcass conformation score (scale 1 to 15; Hickey et al. ), measured at slaughter, are estimated in a multi-trait animal model. Cows slaughtered between 875 and 4,000 days of age are included in the evaluation of cow weight while male progeny slaughtered between 300 and 1,200 days of age and female progeny slaughtered between 300 and 875 days of age are included in the evaluation of the remaining three carcass traits.
Genetic evaluations for calving ease are undertaken using a bivariate animal-dam model so that PTAs for direct and maternal calving ease are both generated. In the bivariate model the breeding-goal trait (i.e. the phenotypic trait wished to be improved genetically) is calving ease scored by commercial Irish farmers and the predictor trait is calving ease scored prior to 2002 in progeny test and pedigree herds. A similar approach is used to estimate breeding values for gestation length and perinatal mortality with the exception that an animal model is used. Direct calving difficulty refers to the additive genetic effect of the genotype of the calf (e.g. size of the calf) while maternal calving difficulty refers to the additive genetic effect of the genotype of the calf's dam (e.g. pelvic weight of the dam). Perinatal mortality is a dichotomous variable scored by farmers as calf dead at birth or within 24 hours .
Genetic evaluations for angularity and body condition score are undertaken as part of a joint evaluation in the UK and Ireland. The estimated breeding values (EBVs) are standardised to the mean and standard deviation of the base population. Both angularity and BCS are subjective measures of the subcutaneous fat levels of the live animal. All PTAs were deregressed using the procedure outlined by Berry and colleagues .
Only sires with a reliability, less parental contribution, of > 60% were retained for inclusion in the association analysis. A total of 742 sires fulfilled these criteria for inclusion in the analysis of milk, fat and protein yield as well as milk fat and protein concentration. 501 sires were included in the association analysis with calving interval, while 477 sires were included for association analysis with calf survival. The number of sires with a reliability of > 60% for the carcass traits was 446 and the number of sires with a reliability of > 60% for angularity and body condition score varied and was 521 and 504, respectively. The main advantage of using high reliability sire PTAs generated from progeny performance is the increased accuracy of the phenotype compared to actual phenotypes of individual animals. This is particularly true for low heritability traits where the accuracy of the genetic merit of an animal based on a single measure is low (i.e. square root of the heritability). The use of highly accurate phenotypes in association analyses is vital to obtain accurate estimates of associations.
The association between each SNP and performance was quantified using weighted mixed linear models in ASREML  with individual included as a random effect, and average expected relationships among individuals accounted for through the numerator relationship matrix. Year of birth (divided into five-yearly intervals) and percent Holstein of the individual bull were included as fixed effects in the model. In all instances the dependent variable was de-regressed PTA or DYD, weighted by their respective reliability less the parental contribution. Genotype was included in the analysis as a continuous variable coded as the number of copies of a given allele.
Regression on individual SNPs were initially undertaken to identify spatial patterns of SNPs associated with performance. Because of the covariances between SNPs (i.e. linkage disequilibrium), and between phenotypes, traditional multiple testing adjustments that assume independence among the regressors (e.g. Bonferroni permutation) were not appropriate. Spectral decomposition of the square root of the pair-wise linkage disequilibrium between the SNPs was used to determine the effective number of variables (i.e. SNPs); an effective number of 4.22 SNPs were identified. Furthermore, the phenotypes were grouped into six categories as described previously. Adjustment  for multiple testing was therefore undertaken assuming a total of therefore 25.37 effective independent tests (i.e. 4.22 effective SNPs times six groups of traits).
All research was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines and procedures of the UCC and UCD Animal Ethics Committees.
This work was supported by a Research Stimulus Grant from the Irish Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (project numbers: RSF 06 406, RSF 06 0353 and RSF 06 0409) and Investigator Programme Grants from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/01/F.1/B028; SFI/08/IN.1/B1931). MPM is supported by Science Foundation Ireland grant number 07/SRC/B1156. We also wish to thank the three anonymous reviewers for scientific insight in their critical evaluation of this manuscript.
- Feil R: Epigenetic asymmetry in the zygote and mammalian development. Int J Dev Biol. 2009, 53 (2-3): 191-201. 10.1387/ijdb.082654rf.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morison IM, Paton CJ, Cleverley SD: The imprinted gene and parent-of-origin effect database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (1): 275-276. 10.1093/nar/29.1.275.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML: Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature. 1984, 308 (5959): 548-550. 10.1038/308548a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGrath J, Solter D: Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell. 1984, 37 (1): 179-183. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90313-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williamson CM, Blake A, Thomas S, Beechey CV, Hancock J, Cattanach BM, Peters J: MRC Harwell, Oxfordshire. World Wide Web Site - Mouse Imprinting Data and References. [http://www.har.mrc.ac.uk/research/genomic_imprinting]
- Jirtle RL: Geneimprint website. [http://www.geneimprint.com]
- Horsthemke B, Buiting K: Genomic imprinting and imprinting defects in humans. Adv Genet. 2008, 61: 225-246. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ideraabdullah FY, Vigneau S, Bartolomei MS: Genomic imprinting mechanisms in mammals. Mutat Res. 2008, 647 (1-2): 77-85.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kong A, Steinthorsdottir V, Masson G, Thorleifsson G, Sulem P, Besenbacher S, Jonasdottir A, Sigurdsson A, Kristinsson KT, Frigge ML: Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature. 2009, 462 (7275): 868-874. 10.1038/nature08625.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edwards CA, Ferguson-Smith AC: Mechanisms regulating imprinted genes in clusters. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007, 19 (3): 281-289. 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.04.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verona RI, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS: Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003, 19: 237-259. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.092717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters J, Williamson CM: Control of imprinting at the Gnas cluster. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008, 626: 16-26. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wadhawan S, Dickins B, Nekrutenko A: Wheels within wheels: clues to the evolution of the Gnas and Gnal loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25 (12): 2745-2757. 10.1093/molbev/msn229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinstein LS, Xie T, Zhang QH, Chen M: Studies of the regulation and function of the Gs alpha gene Gnas using gene targeting technology. Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 115 (2): 271-291. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.03.013.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozasa T, Itoh H, Tsukamoto T, Kaziro Y: Isolation and characterization of the human Gs alpha gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85 (7): 2081-2085. 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2081.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinstein LS, Xie T, Qasem A, Wang J, Chen M: The role of GNAS and other imprinted genes in the development of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010, 34 (1): 6-17. 10.1038/ijo.2009.222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayward BE, Kamiya M, Strain L, Moran V, Campbell R, Hayashizaki Y, Bonthron DT: The human GNAS1 gene is imprinted and encodes distinct paternally and biallelically expressed G proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (17): 10038-10043. 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10038.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ischia R, Lovisetti-Scamihorn P, Hogue-Angeletti R, Wolkersdorfer M, Winkler H, Fischer-Colbrie R: Molecular cloning and characterization of NESP55, a novel chromogranin-like precursor of a peptide with 5-HT1B receptor antagonist activity. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (17): 11657-11662. 10.1074/jbc.272.17.11657.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss U, Ischia R, Eder S, Lovisetti-Scamihorn P, Bauer R, Fischer-Colbrie R: Neuroendocrine secretory protein 55 (NESP55): alternative splicing onto transcripts of the GNAS gene and posttranslational processing of a maternally expressed protein. Neuroendocrinology. 2000, 71 (3): 177-186. 10.1159/000054535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelsey G: Epigenetics and imprinted genes: insights from the imprinted Gnas locus. Horm Res. 2009, 71 (Suppl 2): 22-29. 10.1159/000192432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoger R: Epigenetics and obesity. Pharmacogenomics. 2008, 9 (12): 1851-1860. 10.2217/14622422.214.171.1241.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plagge A, Kelsey G, Germain-Lee EL: Physiological functions of the imprinted Gnas locus and its protein variants Galpha(s) and XLalpha(s) in human and mouse. J Endocrinol. 2008, 196 (2): 193-214. 10.1677/JOE-07-0544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krechowec S, Plagge A: Physiological dysfunctions associated with mutations of the imprinted Gnas locus. Physiology (Bethesda). 2008, 23: 221-229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bastepe M: The GNAS locus and pseudohypoparathyroidism. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008, 626: 27-40. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jorgensen TJ, Ruczinski I, Kessing B, Smith MW, Shugart YY, Alberg AJ: Hypothesis-driven candidate gene association studies: practical design and analytical considerations. Am J Epidemiol. 2009, 170 (8): 986-993. 10.1093/aje/kwp242.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu X, Gao Y, Feng C, Liu Q, Wang X, Du Z, Wang Q, Li N: Advanced technologies for genomic analysis in farm animals and its application for QTL mapping. Genetica. 2009, 136 (2): 371-386. 10.1007/s10709-008-9338-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ron M, Weller JI: From QTL to QTN identification in livestock--winning by points rather than knock-out: a review. Anim Genet. 2007, 38 (5): 429-439. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01640.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magee DA, Berry DP, Berkowicz EW, Sikora KM, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, Evans RD, Spillane C, Machugh DE: Single nucleotide polymorphisms within the bovine DLK1-DIO3 imprinted domain are associated with economically important production traits in cattle. J Hered. 2010,Google Scholar
- Magee DA, Berkowicz EW, Sikora KM, Berry DP, Park SDE, Kelly AK, Sweeney T, Kenny DA, Evans RD, Wickham BW: A catalogue of validated single nucleotide polymorphisms in bovine orthologs of mammalian imprinted genes and associations with beef production traits. Animal. 2010,Google Scholar
- Charalambous M, Cowley M, Geoghegan F, Smith FM, Radford EJ, Marlow BP, Graham CF, Hurst LD, Ward A: Maternally-inherited Grb10 reduces placental size and efficiency. Developmental Biology. 2010, 337: 1-8. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alexander LS, Qu A, Cutler SA, Mahajan A, Rothschild MF, Cai W, Dekkers JC, Stahl CH: A calcitonin receptor (CALCR) single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with growth performance and bone integrity in response to dietary phosphorus deficiency. J Anim Sci. 2010, 88 (3): 1009-1016. 10.2527/jas.2008-1730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cockett NE, Smit MA, Bidwell CA, Segers K, Hadfield TL, Snowder GD, Georges M, Charlier C: The callipyge mutation and other genes that affect muscle hypertrophy in sheep. Genet Sel Evol. 2005, 37 (Suppl 1): S65-81. 10.1186/1297-9686-37-S1-S65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Laere AS, Nguyen M, Braunschweig M, Nezer C, Collette C, Moreau L, Archibald AL, Haley CS, Buys N, Tally M: A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature. 2003, 425 (6960): 832-836. 10.1038/nature02064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Georges M, Charlier C, Cockett N: The callipyge locus: evidence for the trans interaction of reciprocally imprinted genes. Trends Genet. 2003, 19 (5): 248-252. 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00082-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Koning DJ, Rattink AP, Harlizius B, van Arendonk JA, Brascamp EW, Groenen MA: Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (14): 7947-7950. 10.1073/pnas.140216397.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nezer C, Moreau L, Brouwers B, Coppieters W, Detilleux J, Hanset R, Karim L, Kvasz A, Leroy P, Georges M: An imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition maps to the IGF2 locus in pigs. Nat Genet. 1999, 21 (2): 155-156. 10.1038/5935.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uemoto Y, Sato S, Ohnishi C, Terai S, Komatsuda A, Kobayashi E: The effects of single and epistatic quantitative trait loci for fatty acid composition in a Meishan × Duroc crossbred population. J Anim Sci. 2009, 87 (11): 3470-3476. 10.2527/jas.2009-1917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodall JJ, Schmutz SM: IGF2 gene characterization and association with rib eye area in beef cattle. Anim Genet. 2007, 38 (2): 154-161. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01576.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berkowicz EW, Magee DA, Sikora KM, Berry DP, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, Evans RD, Spillane C, Machugh DE: Single nucleotide polymorphisms at the imprinted bovine insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) locus are associated with dairy performance in Irish Holstein-Friesian cattle. J Dairy Res. 2010,Google Scholar
- Bagnicka E, Siadkowska E, Strzalkowska N, Zelazowska B, Flisikowski K, Krzyzewski J, Zwierzchowski L: Association of polymorphisms in exons 2 and 10 of the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene with milk production traits in Polish Holstein-Friesian cattle. J Dairy Res. 2010, 77 (1): 37-42. 10.1017/S0022029909990197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stinckens A, Mathur P, Janssens S, Bruggeman V, Onagbesan OM, Schroyen M, Spincemaille G, Decuypere E, Georges M, Buys N: Indirect effect of IGF2 intron3 g.3072G > A mutation on prolificacy in sows. Anim Genet. 2010, 41 (5): 493-498. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02040.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spencer HG: Effects of genomic imprinting on quantitative traits. Genetica. 2009, 136 (2): 285-293. 10.1007/s10709-008-9300-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandor C, Georges M: On the detection of imprinted quantitative trait loci in line crosses: effect of linkage disequilibrium. Genetics. 2008, 180 (2): 1167-1175. 10.1534/genetics.108.092551.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tveden-Nyborg PY, Alexopoulos NI, Cooney MA, French AJ, Tecirlioglu RT, Holland MK, Thomsen PD, D'Cruz NT: Analysis of the expression of putatively imprinted genes in bovine peri-implantation embryos. Theriogenology. 2008, 70 (7): 1119-1128. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruddock NT, Wilson KJ, Cooney MA, Korfiatis NA, Tecirlioglu RT, French AJ: Analysis of imprinted messenger RNA expression during bovine preimplantation development. Biol Reprod. 2004, 70 (4): 1131-1135. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.022236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henckel A, Arnaud P: Genome-wide identification of new imprinted genes. Brief Funct Genomics. 2010, 9 (4): 304-314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bischoff SR, Tsai S, Hardison N, Motsinger-Reif AA, Freking BA, Nonneman D, Rohrer G, Piedrahita JA: Characterization of conserved and nonconserved imprinted genes in swine. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81 (5): 906-920. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.078139.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khatib H, Zaitoun I, Kim ES: Comparative analysis of sequence characteristics of imprinted genes in human, mouse, and cattle. Mamm Genome. 2007, 18 (6-7): 538-547. 10.1007/s00335-007-9039-z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okamura K, Ito T: Lessons from comparative analysis of species-specific imprinted genes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006, 113 (1-4): 159-164. 10.1159/000090828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morison IM, Ramsay JP, Spencer HG: A census of mammalian imprinting. Trends Genet. 2005, 21 (8): 457-465. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khatib H: Imprinting of Nesp55 gene in cattle. Mamm Genome. 2004, 15 (8): 663-667. 10.1007/s00335-004-2331-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magee DA, Berkowicz EW, Sikora KM, Berry DP, Park SDE, Kelly AK, Sweeney T, Kenny DA, Evans RD, Wickham BW: A catalogue of validated single nucleotide polymorphisms in bovine orthologs of mammalian imprinted genes and associations with beef production traits. Animal. 2010, 4 (12): 1958-1970. 10.1017/S1751731110001163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, Dicuccio M, Federhen S: Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, D5-16. 10.1093/nar/gkp967. 38 Database
- Hill WG, Robertson A: Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Applied Genet. 1968, 38: 226-231. 10.1007/BF01245622.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewontin RC: The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics. 1964, 49 (1): 49-67.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao X, Becker LC, Becker DM, Starmer JD, Province MA: Avoiding the high Bonferroni penalty in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2010, 34 (1): 100-105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao X, Starmer J, Martin ER: A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genet Epidemiol. 2008, 32 (4): 361-369. 10.1002/gepi.20310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinstein LS, Chen M, Xie T, Liu J: Genetic diseases associated with heterotrimeric G proteins. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006, 27 (5): 260-266. 10.1016/j.tips.2006.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, Gavrilova O, Liu J, Xie T, Deng C, Nguyen AT, Nackers LM, Lorenzo J, Shen L, Weinstein LS: Alternative Gnas gene products have opposite effects on glucose and lipid metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (20): 7386-7391. 10.1073/pnas.0408268102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu S, Gavrilova O, Chen H, Lee R, Liu J, Pacak K, Parlow AF, Quon MJ, Reitman ML, Weinstein LS: Paternal versus maternal transmission of a stimulatory G-protein alpha subunit knockout produces opposite effects on energy metabolism. J Clin Invest. 2000, 105 (5): 615-623. 10.1172/JCI8437.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu S, Yu D, Lee E, Eckhaus M, Lee R, Corria Z, Accili D, Westphal H, Weinstein LS: Variable and tissue-specific hormone resistance in heterotrimeric Gs protein alpha-subunit (GSα) knockout mice is due to tissue-specific imprinting of the GSα gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (15): 8715-8720. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8715.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cattanach BM, Peters J, Ball S, Rasberry C: Two imprinted gene mutations: three phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9 (15): 2263-2273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters J, Williamson CM: Control of imprinting at the Gnas cluster. Epigenetics. 2007, 2 (4): 207-213. 10.4161/epi.2.4.5380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haig D: Genomic imprinting and kinship: how good is the evidence?. Annu Rev Genet. 2004, 38: 553-585. 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haig D: Huddling: brown fat, genomic imprinting and the warm inner glow. Curr Biol. 2008, 18 (4): R172-174. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert C, Blanc S, Giroud S, Trabalon M, Le Maho Y, Perret M, Ancel A: Role of huddling on the energetic of growth in a newborn altricial mammal. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007, 293 (2): R867-876.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cannon B, Nedergaard J: Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev. 2004, 84 (1): 277-359. 10.1152/physrev.00015.2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith SB, Carstens GE, Randel RD, Mersmann HJ, Lunt DK: Brown adipose tissue development and metabolism in ruminants. J Anim Sci. 2004, 82 (3): 942-954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore T, Haig D: Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 1991, 7 (2): 45-49. 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Connell MJ, Loughran NB, Walsh TA, Donoghue MT, Schmid KJ, Spillane C: A phylogenetic approach to test for evidence of parental conflict or gene duplications associated with protein-encoding imprinted orthologous genes in placental mammals. Mamm Genome. 2010,Google Scholar
- Haig D: Evolutionary conflicts in pregnancy and calcium metabolism--a review. Placenta. 2004, 25 (Suppl A): S10-15. 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eder S, Leierer J, Klimaschewski L, Wilhelm A, Volknandt W, Laslop A, Fischer-Colbrie R: Secretion and molecular forms of NESP55, a novel genomically imprinted neuroendocrine-specific protein from AtT-20 cells. Neurosignals. 2004, 13 (6): 298-307. 10.1159/000081965.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer R, Weiss C, Marksteiner J, Doblinger A, Fischer-Colbrie R, Laslop A: The new chromogranin-like protein NESP55 is preferentially localized in adrenaline-synthesizing cells of the bovine and rat adrenal medulla. Neurosci Lett. 1999, 263 (1): 13-16. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00091-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plagge A, Isles AR, Gordon E, Humby T, Dean W, Gritsch S, Fischer-Colbrie R, Wilkinson LS, Kelsey G: Imprinted Nesp55 influences behavioral reactivity to novel environments. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25 (8): 3019-3026. 10.1128/MCB.25.8.3019-3026.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- APHIS: Dairy Management Practices. National Animal Health Monitoring System (Part 1). Report by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 1996, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
- Nash DL, Rogers GW, Cooper JB, Hargrove GL, Keown JF: Relationships among severity and duration of clinical mastitis and sire transmitting abilities for somatic cell score, udder type traits, productive life, and protein yield. J Dairy Sci. 2002, 85 (5): 1273-1284. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74192-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nash DL, Rogers GW, Cooper JB, Hargrove GL, Keown JF, Hansen LB: Heritability of clinical mastitis incidence and relationships with sire transmitting abilities for somatic cell score, udder type traits, productive life, and protein yield. J Dairy Sci. 2000, 83 (10): 2350-2360. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75123-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shook GE, Schutz MM: Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 1994, 77 (2): 648-658. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76995-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Windig JJ, Ouweltjes W, Ten Napel J, de Jong G, Veerkamp RF, De Haas Y: Combining somatic cell count traits for optimal selection against mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2010, 93 (4): 1690-1701. 10.3168/jds.2009-2052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Haas Y, Ouweltjes W, ten Napel J, Windig JJ, de Jong G: Alternative somatic cell count traits as mastitis indicators for genetic selection. J Dairy Sci. 2008, 91 (6): 2501-2511. 10.3168/jds.2007-0459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lund MS, Guldbrandtsen B, Buitenhuis AJ, Thomsen B, Bendixen C: Detection of quantitative trait loci in Danish Holstein cattle affecting clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, udder conformation traits, and assessment of associated effects on milk yield. J Dairy Sci. 2008, 91 (10): 4028-4036. 10.3168/jds.2007-0290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boysen TJ, Tetens J, Thaller G: Detection of a QTL for ham weight with polar overdominance near the orthologue of the callipyge locus in an experimental pig F2 population. J Anim Sci. 2010,Google Scholar
- Duthie CA, Simm G, Perez-Enciso M, Doeschl-Wilson A, Kalm E, Knap PW, Roehe R: Genomic scan for quantitative trait loci of chemical and physical body composition and deposition on pig chromosome × including the pseudoautosomal region of males. Genet Sel Evol. 2009, 41: 27-10.1186/1297-9686-41-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding N, Guo Y, Knorr C, Ma J, Mao H, Lan L, Xiao S, Ai H, Haley CS, Brenig B: Genome-wide QTL mapping for three traits related to teat number in a White Duroc × Erhualian pig resource population. BMC Genet. 2009, 10: 6-10.1186/1471-2156-10-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magee DA, Berkowicz EW, Sikora KM, Sweeney T, Kenny DA, Kelly AK, Evans RD, Wickham BW, Bradley DG, Spillane C: High concordance of bovine single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes generated using two independent genotyping strategies. Anim Biotechnol. 2010, 21 (4): 257-262. 10.1080/10495398.2010.509680.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berry DP, Shalloo L, Cromie AR, Veerkamp RF, Dillion P, Amer PR, Kearney JF, Evans RD, Wickham B: The economic breeding index: a generation on. Technical report to the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, February 2007. 2007, 29-34.Google Scholar
- Hickey JM, Keane MG, Kenny DA, Cromie AR, Veerkamp RF: Genetic parameters for EUROP carcass traits within different groups of cattle in Ireland. J Anim Sci. 2007, 85 (2): 314-321. 10.2527/jas.2006-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mee JF, Berry DP, Cromie AR: Prevalance of, and risk factors associated with, perinatal calf mortality in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian cows. Animal. 2008, 2: 613-620. 10.1017/S1751731108001699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berry D, Kearney F, Harris B: Genomic selection in Ireland. Proceedings of the Interbull International Workshop: 2009; 2009 January 26-29, Uppsala, Sweden. Interbull Publications, Uppsala, Sweden. 2009, 29-34.Google Scholar
- Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R: ASREML Reference Manual. 2009, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange: New South Wales AgricultureGoogle Scholar
- Bonferroni CE: Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilitá. Pubblicazioni del Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze. 1936, 8: 3-62.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.