Investigation of genetic diversity and population structure of common wheat cultivars in northern China using DArT markers
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 6 October 2010
Accepted: 11 May 2011
Published: 11 May 2011
In order to help establish heterotic groups of Chinese northern wheat cultivars (lines), Diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers were used to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of Chinese common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
In total, 1637 of 7000 DArT markers were polymorphic and scored with high confidence among a collection of 111 lines composed mostly of cultivars and breeding lines from northern China. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of DArT markers ranged from 0.03 to 0.50, with an average of 0.40, with P > 80 (reliable markers). With principal-coordinates analysis (PCoA) of DArT data either from the whole genome or from the B-genome alone, all lines fell into one of two major groups reflecting 1RS/1BL type (1RS/1BL and non-1RS/1BL). Evidence of geographic clustering of genotypes was also observed using DArT markers from the A genome. Cluster analysis based on the unweighted pair-group method with algorithmic mean suggested the existence of two subgroups within the non-1RS/1BL group and four subgroups within the 1RS/1BL group. Furthermore, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed highly significant (P < 0.001) genetic variance within and among subgroups and among groups.
These results provide valuable information for selecting crossing parents and establishing heterotic groups in the Chinese wheat-breeding program.
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), an economically important cereal, is widely cultivated worldwide. Of the nearly 600 Mt of wheat harvested worldwide, about 80% is used as human food . Wheat-breeding programs around the world are working toward improved grain yield with better quality, disease-resistance and agronomic performance.
Knowledge of the genetic diversity within a germplasm collection is the basis for selection of crossing parents, establishing heterotic groups and has a significant impact on the improvement of crops. Therefore, assessment of the extent and nature of genetic variation in bread wheat is important to breeding and genetic resource conservation programs. As molecular markers have been developed, they have been extensively explored for analysis of genetic diversity in common wheat; such markers include restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) [2, 3], randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [4, 5], amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) [6, 7], and simple-sequence repeats (SSR) [8–12].
The 1RS/1BL translocation is one of the most frequently used alien introgressions in wheat-breeding programs throughout the world [13, 14]. In addition to its advantage in disease resistance (Sr31, Lr26, and Yr9) , the 1RS translocation is also useful for its positive effect on agronomic traits including yield performance, yield stability, and wide adaptation [16, 17]. However, 1RS carries the Sec-1 locus coding for ε-secalin, which results in negative effects on bread-making quality, such as poor mixing tolerance, superficial dough stickiness, and low bread volume [18, 19]. Some defects in noodle processing quality are also correlated with this translocation [20, 21]. Various molecular markers, including STS (Sequence-Tagged Site), SCAR (Sequence Characterized Amplified Region), RAPD, and SSR, have been employed to detect the 1RS/1BL translocation [22–24]
Recently, diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers were developed to discover and score genetic polymorphic markers in the whole genome. This technology is a sequence-independent and high-throughput method . DArT markers have been applied to several species including cereals such as barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Not only the technology has been used to create high-density genetic maps  and for association studies [27, 28], but it is also expanding into the study of genetic diversity and population genetics [29–31]. Stodart et al.  compared AFLP, SSR, and DArT markers and found that DArT markers are suitable for estimation of genetic diversity in landrace cultivars of bread wheat.
China is the world's most populous nation, accounting for 20% of the global population. Crop yield has always been a primary concern of agronomists in China. Northern wheat production plays an important role in China's food production. Production in the major growing area of northern China, represents 45-53% of wheat acreage, and accounts for 47-61% of the total production . Since 1RS translocations were introduced to China in the early 1970s, they have been widely used in wheat-breeding programs . In some major wheat-growing area of northern China, 1RS/1BL translocations are present in 50 ~ 70% of all wheat cultivars . Therefore, information about the genetic diversity and the distribution of 1RS/1BL translocations within Chinese germplasm is very important for improving wheat yield with better quality in Chinese northern breeding programs.
To help establish heterotic groups of Chinese northern wheat cultivars (lines), we assessed the genetic diversity in a collection of cultivars from northern China using DArT markers and diversity analysis. We also used DArT data to investigate the distribution of 1RS/1BL lines within the northern cultivars.
Polymorphism of DArT markers
Scanning with about 7000 DArT markers resulted in 2264 polymorphic loci, of which 1362 markers were assigned to the 21 wheat chromosomes. Each DArT marker was subjected to an ANOVA-based statistical analysis to estimate its quality, described as a P-value (the between-allelic-states variance of the relative target hybridization intensity as a percentage of the total variance). In general, markers with P-values above 80 were scored very reliably, according to Triticarte Pty. Ltd. Finally, 1637 DArTs were selected with P-values > 80, 1009 markers of them had genetic locations on the wheat chromosomes. Most of the 1009 DArTs were located on the B genome (566), followed by the A (290) and D genomes (88). Similarly, these DArTs were unevenly distributed among the seven homologous groups of common wheat chromosomes. Group 1 harbored the largest number (241), followed by group 3 (182), group 6 (141), group 7 (138), group 2 (133), group 5 (91), and group 4 (83).
Polymorphism information content (PIC) values, computed for the 1637 polymorphic markers, ranged from 0.03 to 0.50 (the maximum value for a biallelic marker), with a mean value of 0.40. DArT allele frequencies ranged from 0.22 to 0.78 (mean = 0.43 ± 0.13) and showed a near-normal distribution. The DArT markers used showed different levels of genetic diversity; Nei's genetic diversity  ranged from 0.11 to 0.51, with an average of 0.40 for all markers. As this index is equivalent to the PIC index, these results also provide an estimate of the discriminatory power of each DArT locus.
Population structure on the whole-genome level
Linkage disequilibrium analysis was performed to investigate differences between the two groups. As a result, 136 DArT markers on chromosome 1B showed significant LD between DArT markers and the "group locus" with an average r2 value of 0.69 (P < 0.001; range: 0.1 to 1). Among these markers, 11 showing complete LD (r2 = 1 with P = 0) were observed on chromosome 1BS. Considering the possible existence of 1RS/1BL translocations in Chinese cultivars (lines), the primers specific for 1RS of rye were subsequently used to scan all cultivars (lines); this demonstrated that our collection was distinctly separated based on 1RS/1BL and non-1RS/1BL translocations with a few exceptions (see Additional file 1). As shown in Figure 1, the right-hand group was composed of 47 non-1RS/1BL lines, and the left-hand group of 61 1RS/1BL lines. Four 1RS/1BL lines, i.e., cv. Xiaoyan986, Liangxin68, Yanyou361, and Shen99369, were scattered between the two groups. Only one 1RS/1BL line (Luyuan212) fell within the 1BS/1BL cluster.
Population structure based on different wheat genomes
Differences in the genetic structure among the three genomes, A (290), B (566), and D (88), were investigated for relationships among these cultivars (lines).
Genetic relationships among wheat cultivars
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA)
Analysis of molecular variance for 111 wheat cultivars in northern China
Source of variation
Sum of squares
Among 1RS-type groups
Among subgroups within 1RS-type groups
Fixation index (FST) = 0.28
Population pairwise FST values
In this study, we demonstrated the power of DArT markers for investigating population structure and genetic diversity in common wheat; these markers will be useful in integrating this work with future objectives and marker-based results in the wheat-breeding program. DArT markers proved cost effective and ideally suited to high-throughput parallel analysis that was not dependent on in-house infrastructure. These results will be cross applicable with many other projects in wheat that are also using DArT-based markers. Furthermore, when DArT clone sequences are available, these will provide access to other methods for marker design and for orthology-based comparison among species. A recent analysis of DArT clone sequences in oat showed that over one-third of these markers contain DNA sequences with strong homology to functionally annotated genes .
DArT markers in the present study showed an average PIC of 0.40, which suggests that they are sufficiently informative. The polymorphic DArT markers in our samples were frequently present on the B genome, but seldom occurred on the D genome, in keeping with the relative lack of polymorphic DArT markers found in this genome by Akbari et al. (2006). This agrees with the fact that the B genome presents the highest level of polymorphism, whereas the D genome shows the lowest level among the wheat ABD genomes [37–39].
IRS/1BL translocation in Chinese cultivars
STS, SCAR, RAPD, and SSR molecular markers have been employed to detect the 1RS/1BL translocation . DArT markers are dominant, and their polymorphism is based on SNPs and INDELs at restriction enzyme cleavage sites and restriction fragments . DArT markers were shown in this study to be a very powerful tool for detecting 1RS/1BL translocation. PCoA results, based on data from 1637 DArTs from the entire genome, agreed with those obtained by 1RS-specific markers  with an exception of Luyuan212. When the DArTs on chromosome 1B that contributed to separating the translocation lines were removed, the separation was no longer observed, and the profile was similar to that corresponding to the A genome (Figure not shown). In comparison with other molecular markers, DArT was a useful method not only for distinguishing 1RS/1BL lines, but also for possibly identifying the origins or the size of translocation fragments. In this study, several 1RS/1BL lines were observed scattered between the 1RS/1BL and non-1BS/1BL groups, two of which were derived from Shandong province. This result suggests that these lines are likely to carry 1RS with different sizes of 1RS segments or different origins of the 1RS chromosome . Further work including cytological observations is needed to confirm this possibility.
Additional information was revealed by DArT markers based on the different genomes used. Our collection was approximately grouped by geographical region when using data from DArTs on the A genome. Cultivars formed three groups: Beijing, Henan, and Shandong. This clustering result may be explained by the presence of some important development genes on the A genome, which may be involved in selection for adaptation to local environments. For example, chromosome 5A is known to carry a number of genes affecting adaptability and productivity, such as the vernalization requirement gene Vrn-A1, one of the main determinants of the winter/spring growth-habit polymorphism . In addition, the ear morphology gene q, the frost-resistant gene Fr1 , and a QTL response to environmental stress  have all been located on the long arm of 5A. Therefore, cultivars bred in similar ecological zones may have similar adaptability and therefore group together. However, the cultivars from Hebei province overlapped with those from other regions; this may be explained by the fact that Hebei province is located at the junction of these three areas, and therefore, the Hebei cultivars (lines) may show extensive genetic diversities. In our collection, Hebei's genotypes were more diverse than those from the other regions at the A-genome level; the decreasing order of average genetic diversity was Hebei (0.59) > Shandong (0.57) > Henan (0.56) > Beijing (0.53). PCoA analysis performed using data produced by a set of DArT markers assigned to the B genome of common wheat produced a similar result to that based on the whole genome. This is fully explained by the fact that our collection was clustered based on markers specific to translocation of 1RS/1BL on chromosome 1B. In addition, significantly different clusters were observed in the PCoA profile of DArT markers on the D genome; 23 cultivars (lines) that split from the others were mainly composed of genotypes from Shandong and Beijing. Through LD analysis, we found that this separation depended on the 20 DArT markers on chromosome 1D. However, the distribution of DArT markers on the D genome is largely skewed toward chromosome 1D (nearly half, 39/88). These deviated markers are likely to lead to such a clustering, but future cytological analysis will be required to determine the reason for the 1RS/1DL translocation.
As reported by Zhang et al , 1RS/1BL translocation accounts for up to 50-70% of all wheat cultivars in some major wheat-growing area of China. In our study, the results from UPGMA cluster and PCoA analysis revealed that 63.6% (64/111) of wheat cultivars (lines) were 1RS/1BL lines. The distribution of 1RS/1BL translocation was different in the Northern China. The increasing order of percentage of 1RS/1BL lines was Beijing (46%, 11/24) < Shandong (47%, 15/32) < Henan (50%, 7/14) < Hebei (73%, 24/33) in our collection. Only 25% of genotypes from Dezhou in Shandong province were 1RS/1BL translocation lines, while all cultivars (lines) from Baoding (6) and Handan (4) in Hebei province were 1RS/1BL lines (Additional file 1). As mentioned above, Hebei's genotypes showed more genetic diversity than those from the other regions. The introduction of 1RS/1BL increased the genetic diversity but brought in some inferior traits, because the ε-secalin coded by Sec-1 locus on 1RS results in negative effects on bread-making and noodle processing quality. With the improvement of living standards in China, the demand for high-quality wheat has been growing; thus, improving wheat quality has recently become an important goal of the Chinese wheat-breeding program. Information about the genetic diversity and the distribution of 1RS/1BL translocations within a germplasm collection is very important for establishing heterotic groups and improving breeding efficiency. To obtain high-quality cultivars (lines), Chinese breeders should avoid selecting crossing parents from the same 1RS/1BL group.
Our studies demonstrated that DArT markers are a powerful tool for investigating population structure and genetic diversity in common wheat. We separated 111 Chinese wheat cultivars (lines) into two distinct groups based on whether they carry 1RS or non-1RS segments using DArT markers from both the whole genome and the B genome. Our analysis resulted in three geographical groups of cultivars at the A genome level: Beijing, Shandong, and Henan. This information is very important for wheat breeding in China.
Materials and methods
A set of 111 common wheat cultivars and breeding lines was selected to represent the germplasm use in northern China during the last decade. These cultivars (lines) were high quality or high yield, including 24 from the Northern winter wheat region (Beijing region), 87 from the Yellow-Huai winter wheat region (Hebei, Henan, Shandong, Shaanxi, Shanxi, and Jiangsu provinces). A complete listing of these genotypes is provided in Additional file 1.
DArT genotyping and 1RS/1BL detection
DNA was extracted from young leaf tissue from a single plant of each genotype using the protocol recommended by Triticarte Pty. Ltd. (http://www.triticarte.com.au). A total of 111 DNA samples were sent to Triticarte for DArT analysis using the common wheat PstI(TaqI) v3.0 array, which comprises 19,000 clones known to be polymorphic for about 7000 markers in a wide range of wheat cultivars, and about 3500 markers have been assigned to chromosomes using nulli-tetrasomic (NT) lines derived from Chinese Spring .
List of 1RS-specific ISBP markers
Annealing temp. (°C)
The polymorphism information content (PIC) values were calculated for each DArT marker using the formula PIC = 1 - ∑ (Pi)2, where Pi is the proportion of the population carrying the i th allele . Nei's genetic diversity is defined as the probability that two randomly chosen haplotypes are different in the sample and was estimated with the formula [35, 45].
A binary matrix was produced from the DArT data by scoring fragments as 1 or 0 for the presence or absence of a specific marker allele, respectively. Because DArT markers were scored as dominant, no attempt was made to identify loci harboring heterogeneous or heterozygous alleles. Consistent 0/1 data matrices were used as input for genetic diversity and population structure analysis. NTSYSpc (version 2.0) analysis software was used to perform principal-coordinates analysis (PCoA) using a genetic similarity matrix based on the Jacard genetic similarity index (sij). The Jacard coefficient (s ij ) measures the asymmetric information on binary variables and is computed according to the following formula: s ij = p/(p+q+r), where p = number of bands present in both individuals (i and j), q = number of bands present in i and absent in j, r = number of bands present j and absent in i. Based on decomposition of any multidimensional distance metric, PCoA analysis is similar to the more familiar principal-components analysis (PCA), which is based on Euclidean coordinates. The NTSYSpc analysis software was also used to construct an unweighted pair-group method with algorithmic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram.
Linkage disequilibrium analysis was performed to investigate differences between the two groups. Each classified group was defined as a "locus," with the cultivars (lines) in one group scored as "0" and those in another group scored as "1." Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of polymorphic loci was evaluated using the software package TASSEL1.9.4 (http://www.maizegenetics.net/). LD was estimated using the squared allele frequency correlation (r2), which is a measurement of the correlation between a pair of variables .
In addition, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was used to estimate the genetic structure among groups and subgroups of cultivars. This method works on a distance matrix between samples in order to measure the genetic structure of the population from which the samples are drawn. It was carried out using ARLEQUIN v3.11  to estimate genetic variance components and to partition the total variance within and among subgroups and among groups. The significance of variance components was tested using 1000 permutations. The fixation index (FST), which is a measure of population differentiation and genetic distance, based on genetic polymorphism data, was computed.
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB118300), the 863 program (2009AA101102, 2006AA10Z1B2) and Guizhou province governor's project for outstanding science & technology and education personnel ((2010)103).
- FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization): [http://faostat.fao.org/]
- Lubbers EL, Gill KS, Cox TS, Gill BS: Variation of Molecular Markers among Geographically Diverse Accessions of Triticum-Tauschii. Genome. 1991, 34: 354-361.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paull JG, Chalmers KJ, Karakousis A, Kretschmer JM, Manning S, Langridge P: Genetic diversity in Australian wheat varieties and breeding material based on RFLP data. Theor Appl Genet. 1998, 96: 435-446.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joshi CP, Nguyen HT: RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA) Analysis Based Intervarietal Genetic-Relationships among Hexaploid Wheats. Plant Science. 1993, 93: 95-103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M, Milligan BG: Analysis of Population Genetic-Structure with RAPD Markers. Molecular Ecology. 1994, 3: 91-99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy JK, Lakshmikumaran MS, Balyan HS, Gupta PK: AFLP-based genetic diversity and its comparison with diversity based on SSR, SAMPL, and phenotypic traits in bread wheat. Biochem Genet. 2004, 42: 43-59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akond MA, Watanabe N, Furuta Y: Exploration of genetic diversity among Xinjiang Triticum and Triticum polonicum by AFLP markers. J Appl Genet. 2007, 48: 25-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fu YB, Peterson GW, Yu JK, Gao L, Jia J, Richards KW: Impact of plant breeding on genetic diversity of the Canadian hard red spring wheat germplasm as revealed by EST-derived SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2006, 112: 1239-1247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reif JC, Zhang P, Dreisigacker S, Warburton ML, van Ginkel M, Hoisington D, Bohn M, Melchinger AE: Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 110: 859-864.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roussel V, Leisova L, Exbrayat F, Stehno Z, Balfourier F: SSR allelic diversity changes in 480 European bread wheat varieties released from 1840 to 2000. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2005, 111: 162-170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roder MS, Wendehake K, Korzun V, Bredemeijer G, Laborie D, Bertrand L, Isaac P, Rendell S, Jackson J, Cooke RJ, Vosman B, Ganal MW: Construction and analysis of a microsatellite-based database of European wheat varieties. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 106: 67-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang Q, Borner A, Roder S, Ganal W: Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 105: 699-707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rabinovich SV: Importance of wheat-rye translocations for breeding modern cultivars of Triticum aestivum L. (Reprinted from Wheat: Prospects for global improvement, 1998). Euphytica. 1998, 100: 323-340.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schlegel R, Korzun V: About the origin of 1RS.1BL wheat-rye chromosome translocations from Germany. Plant Breeding. 1997, 116: 537-540.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mago R, Miah H, Lawrence GJ, Wellings CR, Spielmeyer W, Bariana HS, McIntosh RA, Pryor AJ, Ellis JG: High-resolution mapping and mutation analysis separate the rust resistance genes Sr31, Lr26 and Yr9 on the short arm of rye chromosome 1. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 112: 41-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burnett CJ, Lorenz KJ, Carver BF: Effects of the 1B/1R translocation in wheat on composition and properties of grain and flour. Euphytica. 1995, 86: 159-166.Google Scholar
- Kim W, Johnson JW, Baenziger PS, Lukaszewski AJ, Gaines CS: Agronomic effect of wheat-rye translocation carrying rye chromatin (1R) from different sources. Crop Science. 2004, 44: 1254-1258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson JM, Griffey CA, Harris CH: Comparative effects of 1BL/1RS translocation in relation to protein composition and milling and baking quality of soft red winter wheat. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76: 467-472.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graybosch RA: Uneasy unions: Quality effects of rye chromatin transfers to wheat. J Cereal Sci. 2001, 33: 3-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu L, Zhou Y, Liu JJ, He ZH, Yang J: Effect of Allelic Variation at the Glu-1 and Glu-3 Loci and Presence of 1BL/1RS T ranslocation on Pan Bread and Dry White Chinese Noodle Quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2004, 34: 8-Google Scholar
- Liu JJ, He ZH, Pena RJ, Zhao ZD: Effect of 1BL/1RS Translocation on Grain Quality and Noodle Quality in Bread Wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2004, 30: 5-Google Scholar
- Weng Y, Azhaguvel P, Devkota RN, Rudd JC: PCR-based markers for detection of different sources of 1AL.1RS and 1BL.1RS wheat-rye translocations in wheat background. Plant Breeding. 2007, 126: 482-486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chai JF, Zhou RH, Jia JZ, Liu X: Development and application of a new codominant PCR marker for detecting 1BL center dot 1RS wheat-rye chromosome translocations. Plant Breeding. 2006, 125: 302-304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang HJ, Yin GH, Xia XC, Feng JJ, Qu YY, He ZH: Evaluation of Molecular Markers Specific for 1BL·1RS Translocation and Characterization of 1RS Chromosome in Wheat Varieties from Different Origins. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2009, 35: 2107-2115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wenzl P, Carling J, Kudrna D, Jaccoud D, Huttner E, Kleinhofs A, Kilian A: Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9915-9920.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Semagn K, Bjornstad A, Skinnes H, Maroy AG, Tarkegne Y, William M: Distribution of DArT, AFLP, and SSR markers in a genetic linkage map of a doubled-haploid hexaploid wheat population. Genome. 2006, 49: 545-555.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang LY, Marchand S, Tinker NA, Belzile F: Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in barley assessed by DArT markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 119: 43-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crossa J, Burgueno J, Dreisigacker S, Vargas M, Herrera-Foessel SA, Lillemo M, Singh RP, Trethowan R, Warburton M, Franco J, Reynolds M, Crouch JH, Ortiz R: Association analysis of historical bread wheat germplasm using additive genetic covariance of relatives and population structure. Genetics. 2007, 177: 1889-1913.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raman H, Stodart BJ, Cavanagh C, Mackay M, Morell M, Milgate A, Martin P: Molecular diversity and genetic structure of modern and traditional landrace cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Pasture Sci. 2010, 61: 222-229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stodart BJ, Mackay MC, Raman H: Assessment of molecular diversity in landraces of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) held in an ex situ collection with Diversity Arrays Technology (DArTTM). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007, 58: 1174-1182.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- White J, Law JR, MacKay I, Chalmers KJ, Smith JS, Kilian A, Powell W: The genetic diversity of UK, US and Australian cultivars of Triticum aestivum measured by DArT markers and considered by genome. Theor Appl Genet. 2008, 116: 439-453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang H, Pan X, Wu W: Space-time variance and Zoning Advantage Analysis of China wheat. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. 2005, 26: 39-42.Google Scholar
- Zhou Y, He ZH, Zhang GS, Xia LQ, Cheng XM, Gao YC, Jin ZB, Yu GJ: Utilization of 1BL/1RS Translocation in Wheat Breeding in China. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2004, 30: 5-9.Google Scholar
- Zhang XY, Dong YC, You GX, Wang LF, Li P, Jia JZ: Allelic Variation of Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 in chinese commercial in wheat varieties in the last 50 years. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2001, 34: 8-11.Google Scholar
- Nei M, Li WH: Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76: 5269-5273.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tinker NA, Kilian A, Wight CP, Heller-Uszynska K, Wenzl P, Rines HW, Bjornstad A, Howarth CJ, Jannink JL, Anderson JM, Rossnagel BG, Stuthman DD, Sorrells ME, Jackson EW, Tuvesson S, Kolb FL, Olsson O, Federizzi LC, Carson ML, Ohm HW, Molnar SJ, Scoles GJ, Eckstein PE, Bonman JM, Ceplitis A, Langdon T: New DArT markers for oat provide enhanced map coverage and global germplasm characterization. Bmc Genomics. 2009, 10: 39-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roder MS, Plaschke J, Konig SU, Borner A, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD, Ganal MW: Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat. Mol Gen Genet. 1995, 246: 327-333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guyomarc'h H, Sourdille P, Charmet G, Edwards J, Bernard M: Characterisation of polymorphic microsatellite markers from Aegilops tauschii and transferability to the D-genome of bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 104: 1164-1172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akbari M, Wenzl P, Caig V, Carling J, Xia L, Yang S, Uszynski G, Mohler V, Lehmensiek A, Kuchel H, Hayden MJ, Howes N, Sharp P, Vaughan P, Rathmell B, Huttner E, Kilian A: Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for high-throughput profiling of the hexaploid wheat genome. Theor Appl Genet. 2006, 113: 1409-1420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartos J, Paux E, Kofler R, Havrankova M, Kopecky D, Suchankova P, Safar J, Simkova H, Town CD, Lelley T, Feuillet C, Doležel1 J: A first survey of the rye (Secale cereale) genome composition through BAC end sequencing of the short arm of chromosome 1R. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8: 95-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snape JW, Law CN, Parker BB, Worland AJ: Genetical analysis of chromosome 5A of wheat and its influence on important agronomic characters. Theor Appl Genet. 1985, 71: 9-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galiba G, Quarrie SA, Sutka J, Morgounov A, Snape JW: RFLP mapping of the vernalization (Vrn1) and frost resistance (Fr1) genes on chromosome 5A of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1995, 90: 6-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quarrie SA, Gulli M, Calestani C, Steed A, Marmiroli N: Location of a gene regulating drought-induced abscisic acid production on the long arm of chromosome 5A of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1994, 89: 7-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW: Construction of a Genetic-Linkage Map in Man Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1980, 32: 314-331.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nei M: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
- Jaccard P: Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vand Sci Nat. 1908, 4: 223-270.Google Scholar
- Hill WG, Robertson A: The effects of inbreeding at loci with heterozygote advantage. Genetics. 1968, 60: 615-628.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S: Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2005, 1: 47-50.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar