Open Access

Genetic variation in polyploid forage grass: Assessing the molecular genetic variability in the Paspalumgenus

  • Fernanda W Cidade1,
  • Bianca BZ Vigna2,
  • Francisco HD de Souza2,
  • José Francisco M Valls3,
  • Miguel Dall’Agnol4,
  • Maria I Zucchi5,
  • Tatiana T de Souza-Chies6 and
  • Anete P Souza1, 7Email author
BMC Genetics201314:50

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-50

Received: 29 October 2012

Accepted: 22 May 2013

Published: 8 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Paspalum (Poaceae) is an important genus of the tribe Paniceae, which includes several species of economic importance for foraging, turf and ornamental purposes, and has a complex taxonomical classification. Because of the widespread interest in several species of this genus, many accessions have been conserved in germplasm banks and distributed throughout various countries around the world, mainly for the purposes of cultivar development and cytogenetic studies. Correct identification of germplasms and quantification of their variability are necessary for the proper development of conservation and breeding programs. Evaluation of microsatellite markers in different species of Paspalum conserved in a germplasm bank allowed assessment of the genetic differences among them and assisted in their proper botanical classification.

Results

Seventeen new polymorphic microsatellites were developed for Paspalum atratum Swallen and Paspalum notatum Flüggé, twelve of which were transferred to 35 Paspalum species and used to evaluate their variability. Variable degrees of polymorphism were observed within the species. Based on distance-based methods and a Bayesian clustering approach, the accessions were divided into three main species groups, two of which corresponded to the previously described Plicatula and Notata Paspalum groups. In more accurate analyses of P. notatum accessions, the genetic variation that was evaluated used thirty simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci and revealed seven distinct genetic groups and a correspondence of these groups to the three botanical varieties of the species (P. notatum var. notatum, P. notatum var. saurae and P. notatum var. latiflorum).

Conclusions

The molecular genetic approach employed in this study was able to distinguish many of the different taxa examined, except for species that belong to the Plicatula group, which has historically been recognized as a highly complex group. Our molecular genetic approach represents a valuable tool for species identification in the initial assessment of germplasm as well as for characterization, conservation and successful species hybridization.

Keywords

Cross-species amplification Genetic diversity Germplasm evaluation Microsatellite markers Paspalum botanical varieties

Background

The genus Paspalum L. is an important member of the Paniceae tribe (Poaceae) and includes between 330 and 400 species, most of which are native to the tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas [13]. Paspalum species can be found in diverse habitats, such as subtropical rainforests, savannas, marshes and dunes, but they are more frequently found in the natural grasslands of eastern Bolivia, Paraguay, central and southern Brazil, northern Argentina and Uruguay [3]. The main center of origin and diversity of the genus is considered to be located in the South American tropics and subtropics [1], primarily in central Brazil, where numerous species appear to be associated with savannas and rocky terrain. Brazil harbors the greatest number of Paspalum species [4, 5], with approximately 220 species that exist in nearly all herbaceous plant communities within different ecosystems [6].

Because of this degree of complexity, the division of the Paspalum genus into subgenera, sections or informal groups has been proposed by many authors and has been extensively discussed [13, 716]. Currently, four subgenera are recognized within Paspalum: Paspalum subg. Anachyris Chase, P. subg. Ceresia (Pers.) Rchb., P. subg. Harpostachys (Trin.) S. Denham and P. subg. Paspalum[3], the last of which consists of approximately 265 species divided into 25 informal groups [1, 14]. However, such rankings have been based on morphological similarities, and the evolutionary and genetic relationships between these groups are not always clear. Several species, mainly within Paspalum subg. Paspalum, are of economic importance for foraging, turf and ornamental purposes [17] in different parts of the world. Dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum Poir., Dilatata group) and bahiagrass (P. notatum Flüggé, Notata group) are especially important and are widely used for forage, mainly in the southern United States of America (USA) [18, 19]. P. atratum Swallen (Plicatula group) has been the object of growing interest for use as forage in areas that are subjected to periodic flooding in Florida (USA), northeastern Argentina, Brazil, Thailand, the Philippines and Australia [18]. In addition, Paspalum scrobiculatum L. (‘Kodo millet’, Plicatula group) is cultivated in India as a cereal crop [3, 20], and Paspalum vaginatum Sw. (Disticha group) [21] and P. notatum[19] are widely grown as turf grass.

Because of the widespread interest in several species of this genus, many accessions have been conserved in germplasm banks and distributed throughout various countries for cultivar development and cytogenetic studies. However, the use of some accessions is restricted due to difficulty with accurate taxonomical identification. In Brazil, despite constant evaluations of germplasm banks and taxonomic reviews [22], many species of Paspalum, especially those included in the Plicatula Group, remain unidentified. This deficit presents a problem because the correct identification of germplasms and the quantification of their variability are necessary for the development of conservation and breeding programs.

The complexity of the taxonomical classification of Paspalum germplasms results from the complex evolutionary history of the group. Polyploidy occurs at a high frequency within the genus [23, 24] and has played a crucial role in the evolution of Paspalum. Most species have × = 10 as the basic chromosome number, with ploidy levels that range from diploid to hexadecaploid [25]. Diploid species are not rare within the genus [3, 2532], but nearly 80% of the investigated species are polyploids, among which 50% are tetraploid, and most of these tetraploids are apomictic [24, 33]. Many Paspalum species comprise sexual diploid and apomictic polyploid cytotypes, and several have been shown to have arisen through natural hybridization [34]. However, interspecific hybridization and allopolyploidy are not always morphologically evident in Paspalum species; therefore, additional methods of taxonomic classification are required [35].

Many taxonomical and species characterization problems arise as a consequence of the great morphological variation present in agamic complexes. P. notatum is a good example of this situation, because it forms an agamic complex and presents wide morphological variation [7, 36, 37]. This species is a perennial rhizomatous turf and forage grass and is recognized as a major constituent of the native grasslands of the New World, being found from Central Eastern Mexico to Argentina and throughout the West Indies [1]. This grass is economically important and is widely used for forage production, mainly in the southern USA [19].

Various morphological and cytological forms are recognized within P. notatum[7, 37]. This species includes several genotypes, which differ in both their ploidy levels and their reproductive systems. The diploid cytotype (2n = 2× = 20) is sexual and self-incompatible [38, 39], whereas the tetraploid cytotype (2n = 4× = 40) is a self-compatible pseudogamous aposporous apomict [40]. Apomixis in tetraploid P. notatum can be either obligate or facultative [24]. In botanical terms, the tetraploid cytotypes are usually considered to be the typical form of P. notatum; as such, they form the variety notatum. On the other hand, the diploid cytotypes are classified as belonging to the saurae variety based on their distinct morphological characteristics [36]. In addition to these two widely recognized varieties, Döll [41] proposed the variety latiflorum, which was accepted by some taxonomists [36, 42, 43] until the mid-1980s. However, P. notatum var. latiflorum is not currently recognized.

Molecular makers are of great value in plant studies and have been used for multiple purposes, including estimating the genetic diversity, determining accession relationships, elucidating evolutionary relationships, aiding in the taxonomic classification of many plants [4449] and aiding in the identification of botanical varieties [50, 51]. In addition, utilizing molecular markers that regularly identify many genetic polymorphisms at low taxonomic levels makes it possible to address the relationship between morphological and genotypic variation.

The molecular markers that are more informative for the discrimination of closely related genotypes include microsatellite sequence markers [5254]. Microsatellites are tandem repeat sequences of 1 to 6 nucleotides that are widely distributed in the genome [55]. However, these markers are usually species specific, and in the Paspalum genus, few microsatellite markers are available for P. vaginatum[56], P. dilatatum and the related species [57], P. notatum[58] and P. atratum[59]. However, primers designed for source species have been successfully employed to amplify nuclear SSRs in closely related taxa when the DNA regions that flank the microsatellite loci are sufficiently conserved [57, 5967].

The main objectives of this study are (1) to evaluate the informative potential of SSRs for genetic discrimination in different species of Paspalum using markers developed for P. atratum and P. notatum; (2) to conduct an in-depth study of the extent, distribution and structure of the genetic variation of P. notatum in a South American collection of this species; and (3) to evaluate the genetic patterns and relationships among different morphological types found in this species and correlate them with their geographic distribution.

Methods

Plant material and DNA extraction

A total of 214 accessions of Paspalum (177 accessions sampled from 35 species and 37 unclassified accessions) were included in this study. These accessions have been maintained in vivo at Embrapa Southeast Livestock, located in São Carlos, São Paulo (SP), Brazil and at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil (Additional file 1). Fifty-seven P. notatum accessions from germplasm collections were evaluated in a more detailed analysis in this study (Additional file 2). The genomic formula, chromosome number, type of polyploidy and mode of reproduction are presented for all Paspalum species investigated in this study (Additional file 3).

Genomic DNA from each sample was isolated from lyophilized young leaf tissue using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method proposed by Doyle and Doyle [68] with minor modifications. DNA concentrations were estimated by comparison with known concentrations of λ DNA on 0.8% agarose gels.

Development of new SSR markers for Paspalumand SSR analysis

A microsatellite-enriched genomic library was obtained for P. notatum using the method described by Billotte et al. [69]. The steps for obtaining the clones, sequencing and analysis, the determination of the criteria for selecting the microsatellites, the primer design and the amplification were conducted according to previously described methodology [58]. For some loci, a touchdown protocol was used, as previously described [70]. Only the strongest bands were considered because of the possibility that lighter bands could be stutter bands that result from the slippage of Taq polymerase during the PCR amplifications [63, 71].

Cross-species amplification was tested for 214 accessions that correspond to 35 Paspalum species, with a set of 23 SSR primer pairs developed for P. atratum and P. notatum[58, 59] and new SSRs developed in this work. An SSR was considered to be transferable when a band of the expected size was amplified via PCR and an SSR pattern was observed. To avoid false negatives, primers that resulted in null alleles in some of the samples were tested at least twice. The microsatellite loci that were amplified successfully and that showed readable electrophoretic patterns and an absence of nonspecific products were used for the genetic evaluation of the germplasm collection.

A more detailed and accurate analysis of the P. notatum accessions was conducted using 15 microsatellite markers developed by Cidade et al. [58, 59] and 15 new SSRs developed in this work.

The total Paspalum germplasm and the P. notatum accessions were genotyped and analyzed in the same manner. No assumptions were made about the genetic nature of the examined alleles because of the high ploidy levels of the majority of the Paspalum accessions. Hence, each SSR allele was treated as dominant in this study due to the high ploidy levels of the samples [72]; these alleles will hereafter be referred to as bands. Each allele was scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and was arranged in a matrix. Non-amplified loci were scored as missing data. Summary statistics, including the total number of bands, the number of bands per locus, and the polymorphism information content (PIC) [72] were determined based on the data matrix that documented the microsatellite genotyping of each locus. To verify the information obtained for these SSR loci for future genetic studies of other Paspalum species, the number of bands and the PIC values were calculated for each marker within each species.

Clustering and population structure analyses

For the analysis of the Paspalum germplasm, genetic similarity (GS) indices were calculated for all the possible pairwise comparisons using Dice’s similarity coefficient [73]. For calculation of the P. notatum GS indices, Jaccard´s similarity index was used [74]. All of the calculations were performed with the software package NTSYS-pc 2.1 [75]. For both analyses, clustering was performed using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) [76], and the significance of the cophenetic correlation was tested with the Mantel correspondence test [77]. Additionally, a PCO was conducted.

An unrooted dendrogram was constructed for both analyses using the weighted neighbor-joining method (NJ) with DARwin 5.0.157 software [78], and trees were drawn with Figtree v. 1.3.1 software [79]. The bootstrap method was employed to evaluate the reliability of the tree topology. Bootstrap calculations were performed using BOOD 3.0 [80] and DARwin 5.0.157 [78] software based on 1000 replications. The cophenetic coefficient between the matrix of genetic similarity and the dendrogram was computed using NTSYS-pc 2.1 software [75].

The program STRUCTURE, version 2.3.2 [8183], was used to detect the population structure and to assign individuals to subpopulations. This program employs model-based clustering in which a Bayesian approach identifies groups based on compliance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and linkage equilibrium. In this study, membership in each genotype was tested for the range of genetic groups, from K = 1 to K = 12, with the admixture model and without prior information regarding their origin, using 300,000 replicates for burn-in and 500,000 replicates for Markov Chain Monte Carlo processes for each run. Analyses were conducted with correlated allele frequencies (AFC) for the putative populations. The final subgroups were determined based on the ad hoc measure ΔK [84], which was calculated using an application on the STRUCTURE Harvester website [85].

The binary matrix derived from the SSR data was examined via an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) using Arlequin 3.11 software [86]. The partitioning of the genetic variation within Paspalum was calculated, and the significance of each variation was estimated non-parametrically using 1000 permutations. An AMOVA was also performed to evaluate the differentiation between the P. notatum groups obtained from STRUCTURE. Furthermore, the genetic distances among these groups were calculated as the Slatikin distance and pairwise ϕST.

Morphological traits of Paspalum notatum

Data regarding nine morphological traits from [87] and unpublished data from Batista (2008) were used for the morphological analysis of P. notatum. The following vegetative traits were included in this analysis: leaf sheath length (LSL), leaf sheath width (LSW), leaf blade length (LBL), leaf blade width (LBW) and leaf blade hairiness (LBH). In addition, the following four reproductive traits were examined: inflorescence stem length (ISL), average length of inflorescence branches (ALIB), spikelet length (SL) and spikelet width (SW). The plant material was botanically identified according to Parodi [36], Barreto [7] and Canto-Dorow [37].

A data matrix was created that included 46 accessions and nine morphological traits, which comprised a mixed matrix that was composed of one qualitative and eight quantitative traits. The data were standardized by dividing each real value by the standard deviation of the trait. A PCO was performed, and descriptive statistics were calculated using GENES software [88]. Pairwise matrices of Euclidean distance were calculated using NTSYS-pc 2.1 software [75]. Based on the results obtained via principal coordinate analysis (PCA) and PCO, a graph was constructed using STATISTICA software, version 7.0 [89].

To estimate the correlation between the morphological distances and molecular similarities, a Jaccard’s similarity matrix was constructed based on molecular genotyping of the morphologically evaluated accessions. Correlations were calculated using the Mantel test [77] in NTSYS-pc 2.1 software [75].

Geographic origin of Paspalum notatum

The geographic coordinates of the P. notatum accessions were used to construct a matrix of linear distances (in kilometers) between pairs of genotypes using Geographic Distance Matrix Generator software [90]. The correlation between this matrix and the genetic similarity matrix (generated using microsatellites) was tested with NTSYS-pc 2.1 software using the Mantel test. The geographic distribution of the accessions was visualized with the DIVA-GIS program, version 5.2.0.2 [91].

Results

Development of new SSR markers for Paspalumand SSR analysis

Seventeen new SSR polymorphic loci were developed for the investigated Paspalum species (Table 1), among which 15 were isolated from P. notatum and two from P. atratum. A total of 121 bands were scored; the number of bands per locus ranged from 4 to 15, with an average of 7.12 bands per locus (Table 2).
Table 1

New SSR loci developed for Paspalum

Locus name

Repeat motif

Ta(°C)

Product size(bp)

NM

PIC

F(5´-3´)

R(5´-3´)

GenBank accession number

PN02-B3

(GT)12

50

139-157

11

0,8

CAAACAATGGGACAACACTT

TTTTTCTGCTCTGGCTCAT

HQ585421

PN02-C6

(TG)8

51,4

139-145

4

0,3

TTCAGCAATCAAGAGTTAGA

AGAGACGATCAGGGTGTG

HQ585422

PN02-G3

(GT)9

60

294-302

5

0,6

GTCGCCGGTCGCAGTCG

CACATAGCCGGCCTCCTCTC

HQ585423

PN02-G7

(AC)7

TOUCHDOWN

118

7

0,7

TGCAGCATGTAATAACC

TACACAGGAAGGAAGAAA

HQ585424

PN03-C7

(GT)6.

50

159-165

3

0,6

TCATGCCACGAGAAAGAAACCA

CAGGGACGACAGGGACAAGACT

HQ585425

PN03-D10

(GT)11

50

280-300

7

0,7

GTTATTCCTTCACTCACTCACC

AGCTTTCTGCCTTCTTTTT

HQ585426

PN03-D12

(AG)10

50

220-240

7

0,7

TGGGGAAGCAGGAAGTCACA

CAGCTCACCGATGGGAATG

HQ585427

PN03-E7

(GT)9

TOUCHDOWN

298

7

0,7

CATGCTTTTCTGCTTCC

GCTAATACTGCTTGCTCTTC

HQ585428

PN03-F1

(CA)7

50

184-192

5

0,7

CAGTGACCAAGCTTACAACCTA

GTGGCATGCCTTTCTACAA

HQ585429

PN03-F10

(TG)7

60

165-177

7

0,8

TGCCTACCGTTTCCTCTTCTCT

GGGATGGGTCTTGACTCTTGAT

HQ585433

PN03-F3

(GT)8

60

165-203

8

0,8

ACCCCGCGTCCTCTTTCTCA

CCCAACCCACCATTATCCTCTG

HQ585430

PN03-F7

(CA)10

50

200-212

6

0,8

TGCTGGCAGTCTTTCTCT

GGCCATACCACTTTTTG

HQ585431

PN03-F9

(CA)8

60

179-275

15

0,9

AAAAGGGCAGGAGTTAGGAC

AGTTGGCTCAGTTACGATTTTA

HQ585432

PN03-G5

(CA)7

60

126-138

6

0,7

AAGTCACCGTTTCAATCCAG

GCAGTGCGCAAGTTTTCT

HQ585434

PN03-H3

(GA)22

51,4

198-250

11

0,8

CATGTAAACGTAGCAGAGGT

GCTAATTTTACAGGGTGGTC

HQ585435

PA01-C8

(AT)2TTA(AT)2TTCA(GA)2

60

247-279

6

0,8

AATCTGACCTGTTTTACTTCTC

TGCATTTTTGGGATACACT

HM208140

PA01-E10

(GGT)2 T(ACT)2

54

186-210

6

0,4

GCGATTATTGTTGTTTGGTTTG

ACGCTTTCTTGTCTTCATCTCA

HM208141

Average

   

7,1

0,7

   

Ta primer annealing temperature, TD touchdown, NM number of markers, PIC polymorphism information content.

PN Paspalum notatum SSR loci, PA P. atratum SSR loci.

Table 2

Characteristics of the microsatellite loci from Paspalum atratum and P. notatum that were used in diversity analyses and cross-species amplification tests

Locus name

Repeat motif

Ta (°C)

Paspalumgenetic characterization

P.notatumgenetic characterization

Reference/GenBank accession no.

   

Product size (bp)

NM

PIC

Product size (bp)

NM

PIC

 

PA02-A5

(GC)3GG(CT)4

60

122-142

9

0.59

NA

NA

NA

58

PA02-B1

(CGGC)3

60

130-202

23

0.81

158-170

5

0.53

58

PA01-B7

(GC)6(CA)2(GA)8CA(GA)9

60

185-310

32

0.89

249-300

7

0.68

58

PA01-C1

(CA)3CG(CA)2CT(AGGA)3

58

231

10

0.25

NA

NA

NA

58

PA02-C3

(CA)3CTGA(CA)4

60

222-400

13

0.78

240-266

3

0.09

58

PA01-C8

(AT)2TTA(AT)2TTCA(GA)2

60

247-279

6

0.76

NA

NA

NA

HM208140

PA01-E10

(GGT)2 T(ACT)2

54

186-210

6

0.43

NA

NA

NA

HM208141

PA02-F8

(AC)4TA(AC)3

TD

166-200

6

0.42

NA

NA

NA

58

PA01- F10

(CT)10

50

188-240

18

0.48

234-220

2

0.14

58

PN03-A6

(GT)8

60

152-192

20

0.76

160-188

11

0.86

57

PN02-B5B

(TCA)4

60

152-234

24

0.79

180-204

4

0.58

57

PN03-C7

(GT)6

50

133-177

20

0.83

159-165

3

0.58

HQ585425

PA02-G11

(CT)11

TD

*

*

*

NA

NA

NA

HQ585425

PA02-H1

(AC)3G(CA)3

TD

*

*

*

NA

NA

NA

HM208150

PA02-H4

(CA)2CT(CA)5 T(AC)2

TD

*

*

*

NA

NA

NA

58

PA02-H8

(GT)3GCA(TG)3

TD

*

*

*

NA

NA

NA

58

PN03-A5

(TG)8

60

*

*

*

249-287

4

0.54

57

PN03-F10

(TG)7

60

*

*

*

165-177

7

0.78

HQ585433

PN02-C6

(TG)8

51.4

*

*

*

139-145

4

0.29

HQ585422

PN02-F6A

(CT)11

60

*

*

*

154-218

22

0.89

57

PN03-D10

(GT)11

50

*

*

*

280-300

7

0.66

HQ585426

PN03-F2

(AC)7

60

*

*

*

241-249

5

0.64

57

PN03-F9

(CA)8

60

*

*

*

179-275

15

0.88

HQ585432

PN02-A12

(GA)3AT(GAA)3

60

NA

NA

NA

185-205

3

0.45

57

PN02-B3

(GT)12

50

NA

NA

NA

139-157

11

0.84

HQ585421

PN02-G10

(CA)8

60

NA

NA

NA

189-219

7

0.83

57

PN02-G3

(GT)9

60

NA

NA

NA

294-302

5

0.6

HQ585423

PN02-G7

(AC)7

TD

NA

NA

NA

118

7

0.74

HQ585424

PN02-H7

(AC)8

60

NA

NA

NA

194-204

4

0.63

57

PN03-D12

(AG)10

50

NA

NA

NA

220-240

7

0.69

HQ585427

PN03-E7

(GT)9

TD

NA

NA

NA

298

7

0.74

HQ585428

PN03-E9b

(AC)7

60

NA

NA

NA

168-186

6

0.59

57

PN03-F1

(CA)7

50

NA

NA

NA

184-192

5

0.71

HQ585429

PN03-F3

(GT)8

60

NA

NA

NA

165-203

8

0.75

HQ585430

PN03-F7

(CA)10

50

NA

NA

NA

200-212

6

0.76

HQ585431

PN03-G5

(CA)7

60

NA

NA

NA

126-138

6

0.74

HQ585434

PN03-G8

(CA)7

60

NA

NA

NA

254-258

3

0.38

57

PN03-H10

(CT)11

60

NA

NA

NA

222-272

13

0.86

57

PN03-H3

(GA)22

51.4

NA

NA

NA

198-250

11

0.84

HQ585435

Average

   

15.58

0.65

 

7.52

0.64

 

* Test of cross-species amplification failed; NA: not analyzed; Ta: primer annealing temperature; TD: touchdown; NM: number of markers; PIC: Polymorphism information content.

Of the 23 microsatellite primer pairs tested for transferability to other species, 12 (52%) successfully amplified their respective loci in most species (Additional file 4). Exceptions were found for the PA01-C8 locus, which showed weak amplification in Paspalum ovale Nees ex Steud., and the PN03-A6 locus, which showed weak amplification in Paspalum pumilum Ness, Paspalum subciliatum Chase, and P. ovale. All 12 of the SSRs that transferred to other species revealed a high degree of SSR polymorphism within the surveyed species, which allowed an analysis of the organization of genetic diversity within the Paspalum germplasm to be conducted. The mean PIC was 0.65, and an average of 15.58 bands per locus was found (Table 2). The PA02-B1, PA01-B7, PN03-C7, PN03-A6, and PN02-B5B loci were the most informative, with more than 20 bands being amplified for each of these loci (Additional file 4).

Among the P. notatum accessions, the 30 microsatellite primer pairs evaluated amplified a total of 208 bands, with an average of 6.93 fragments per locus and a mean PIC of 0.64 being obtained (Table 2). The combined electrophoretic profile of all of the loci revealed 44 distinct genotypes, which suggests that there were duplicates or clones in the analyzed material.

Clustering analyses in the Paspalumgenus

All of the analyses performed supported the formation of three major groups in the evaluated Paspalum germplasm (Figures 1, 2 and 3), which corresponded to the Paspalum botanical groups Notata and Plicatula and a group formed by all the other species of Paspalum. Because of the differences between the matrices obtained when analyzing different microsatellite loci, we will address only the major groups and the most robustly supported groups derived from distinct methods of analysis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Principal coordinate analysis based on Dice’s similarity matrix for the 214 accessions from the Paspalum species. Principal coordinate analysis (goodness-of-fit 0.86 (P < 0.001)) based on Dice’s similarity matrix for the 214 accessions from the Paspalum species from the analysis of 187 SSR bands. The three ordination factors together explain 40.21% of the variation in the data matrix. “A” is a bi-dimensional scatter plot, and “B” is a tri-dimensional scatter plot.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Detailed unrooted neighbor-joining tree based on Dice’s similarity coefficient for the 214 Paspalum accessions. A detailed unrooted neighbor-joining tree based on Dice’s similarity coefficient for the 214 Paspalum accessions on the basis of 187 SSR bands.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

STRUCTURE analysis for the 214 Paspalum accessions. A bar plot obtained from a model-based ancestry analysis of the 214 Paspalum accessions implemented within the STRUCTURE software.

The PCO showed a goodness-of-fit value of 0.86 (P < 0.001) and indicated the existence of three main groups (Figure 1), which correspond to the Plicatula group (except for some dispersed species) and the Notata group (P. notatum, P. pumilum, P. subciliatum, Paspalum cromyorhizon Trin. ex Döll and Paspalum ionanthum Chase, with the last two being grouped more distantly from the other species in this group), and to a third group that is composed of other species from different botanical groups of Paspalum (Additional file 1). The three-dimensional PCO scatter plot (Figure 1B) showed the same trend of a tripartite division; however, the species of the Plicatula group were more dispersed. The three principal vectors, PC1 (26.77), PC2 (9.52) and PC3 (3.92), accounted for 40.21% of the variation. The NJ trees based on Dice´s similarity coefficient support the results of the PCO analysis, identifying three main groups – the Notata Group, the Plicatula Group and a third group formed by species from other botanical groups (Figure 2).

The Bayesian analysis of the population structure using a model-based approach provided support for a genetic division of the Paspalum germplasm into three distinct groups (Figure 3), with K = 3 (Additional file 5). Out of the twelve runs for K = 3, the run with the highest likelihood value was selected to assign posterior membership coefficients (Q) to each accession, which supported the results obtained from the other methods of analysis, described previously (Figure 3).

The inter-species pair-wise genetic dissimilarity among the 214 accessions that belong to different Paspalum species varied from 0.00 among some P. notatum accessions to 0.80 among Paspalum conjugatum P.J.Bergius and Paspalum rhodopedum L.B.Sm. & Wassh., with an overall average of 0.43 being obtained.

Population structure in Paspalum notatum

The Bayesian analysis performed with STRUCTURE software revealed two main values of K (Additional file 6). Figure 4 shows sub-figures for two K values up to the number of groups detected in UPGMA because both levels of subdivisions were instructive. K = 2 separates individuals from S. Tome (Argentina) from the accessions from other localities, and the K = 7 groups show correspondence to the botanical varieties of P. notatum. The accessions from groups A, B, C and D belong to the variety notatum, while the accessions from group E and some of the accessions from groups F and G belong to the variety latiflorum. The saurae variety accessions belong to the same genetic group (G). The number of accessions that correspond to each botanical variety and to each of the seven STRUCTURE groups with more than a 50% membership probability is shown in Additional file 7. The M54 accession from the Guaíba region, RS, Brazil, showed a mixed group membership, which corresponded to both groups D (0.49) and G (0.487); however, this accession exhibits morphological traits that are more similar to group G. Group F corresponds to the accessions from S. Tome (Argentina), which separated when K = 2.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

STRUCTURE analysis of P . notatum . Structure analysis with K = 2 and K = 7 populations for the collection of P. notatum showing the sub-divisions within each variety, which are indicated.

Similarity and distance-based methods (PCA, NJ, UPGMA) (Figures 5, 6, 7) revealed accession relationships that were consistent with the STRUCTURE-based membership assignment for most of the accessions (using K = 7, Figure 4), as indicated by the colors in the UPGMA dendrogram (Figure 6). On the other hand, the groups formed in PCA (Figure 7) indicate a correlation between the botanical varieties observed in P. notatum. The coefficients of similarity for all of the P. notatum accessions ranged from 0.17 to 1.0, with an average value of 0.42 being obtained. The cophenetic correlation coefficient in the UPGMA dendrogram was 0.92, which suggests that there were low levels of distortion between the matrix and the phenograms.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Principal component analysis based on Jaccard’s similarity for P . notatum . PCA based on Jaccard’s similarity, which resulted from 57 accessions of Paspalum notatum. The branch colors correspond to the colors of the STRUCTURE clusters from Figure 4, K=7.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Dendrogram based on Jaccard´s similarity coefficient for 57 Paspalum notatum accessions. An UPGMA dendrogram based on Jaccard´s similarity coefficient for 57 Paspalum notatum accessions. The branch colors correspond to the colors in the STRUCTURE clusters from Figure 4, K=7.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-50/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1118_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Principal component analysis based on nine morphological traits for P . notatum . A principal component analysis was based on nine morphological traits in 46 Paspalum notatum accessions. The branch colors correspond to the colors in the STRUCTURE clusters from Figure 4, K=7.

The AMOVA showed highly significant (P < 0.001) differentiation among groups A, B, C, D, E, F and G, which indicates that approximately 47% of the observed variation can be explained by the subdivision of the accessions into these seven groups (Table 3).
Table 3

AMOVA for the groups of Paspalum notatum accessions detected via STRUCTURE analysis of 30 SSR markers

Source of variation

D.f.

Sum of squares

Variance of variation

Percentage

Among clusters

6

768.87

13.94 Va

47.05

Within clusters

50

784.66

15.70 Vb

52.95

Total

56

1,553.53

29.64

 

In the NJ (not shown) and UPGMA trees (Figure 6), greater genetic divergence was observed among the saurae variety accessions in comparison to other varieties, and saurae behaved as an outgroup in the dendrogram. This variety is distinguished from the others mainly by its ploidy level (diploid) and reproductive system (sexual self-incompatible), while P. notatum var. notatum and P. notatum var. latiflorum are either obligate or facultative tetraploid apomictics.

Exclusive bands were found between the different varieties (Table 4); however, these bands were not present in all of the accessions of a given variety but were instead differentially distributed between the corresponding gene groups.
Table 4

Exclusive bands revealed by SSR markers in Paspalum notatum varieties

 

Exclusive bands inP.notatumvarieties

SSR loci

var. notatum

var. latiflorum

var. saurae

PN03-A6

 

bands 1, 10

 

PN03-D12

band 6

bands 1, 4, 5 (240, 228, 226 bp)

 

PN03-E7

band 7

band 1

 

PN03-E9

 

band 3

 

PN03-F2

 

band 5

 

PN03-F3

bands 7, 8 (169, 165 bp)

band 6 (197 bp)

 

PN03-F9

bands 1, 2, 3, 9 (275, 250, 248, 192 bp)

band 5 (220 bp)

 

PN03-F10

 

band 1

 

PN03-G3

band 1

band 5

 

PN03-G7

band 7

band 1

 

PN03-G8

 

band 1

 

PN03-H3

bands 10, 11 (206, 198 bp)

bands 1, 9 (250, 210 bp)

 

PN03-H10

 

bands 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 11

band 13

PN02-B3

 

bands 7, 11 (145, 135 bp)

 

PN02-C6

 

band 2

band 1

PN03-D10

 

bands 1, 2 (300, 296 bp)

 

PN02-F6

bands 19, 20, 21, 22

bands 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18

 

PN02-G10

 

bands 1, 7

 

PN02-H7

band 1

  

PA02-B1

bands 1, 5 (170, 158 bp)

  

PA01-B7

 

bands 1, 3, 6 (300, 288, 259 bp)

 

PA02- C3

 

band 2 (242 bp)

band 1 (266 bp)

Genetic diversity and relationships among the seven groups of Paspalum notatumgroups

Descriptive statistics for the P. notatum groups detected via STRUCTURE analysis (Table 5) revealed that groups E and G exhibited the highest genetic diversity. The overall ϕST among the seven groups was 0.47 (95% confidence interval, p < 0.001), with the ϕST value for each cluster ranging from 0.46 to 0.52. Pairwise comparisons on the basis of the ϕST values can be interpreted as standardized population distances between any two groups. The pairwise ϕST values obtained in this work ranged from 0.181 between groups E and G to 0.803 between groups B and F (Table 6). The genetic distance data agreed with the ϕST estimates. The smallest genetic distance was observed between groups E and G (0.222), whereas groups F and B presented the greatest genetic distance (4.075).
Table 5

Descriptive statistics for the entire group of Paspalum notatum accessions and for the groups detected via STRUCTURE analysis of the 30 SSR markers

Statistic

Overall

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

Sample size

57

9

8

6

5

10

8

11

Total number of alleles

208

102

91

94

83

146

84

144

Number of alleles per locus

6.93

3.40

3.03

3.13

2.77

4.87

2.80

4.80

Number of polymorphic sites

200

80

52

50

43

136

30

124

Genetic diversity (He)

0.68

0.55

0.54

0.53

0.52

0.65

0.51

0.65

PIC

0.64

0.50

0.48

0.48

0.44

0.60

0.45

0.60

Fst

0.47

0.46

0.50

0.49

0.49

0.43

0.52

0.43

* A, C, D and E belong to the variety notatum; B, F and G, in general, belong to latiflorum; and F also includes var. saurae; Fst is the fixation index.

Table 6

Genetic distances between the Paspalum notatum groups based on STRUCTURE analysis

 

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

A

0

0.54

0.48

0.51

0.28

0.70

0.39

B

1.16

0

0.62

0.60

0.40

0.80

0.44

C

0.92

1.61

0

0.61

0.31

0.77

0.39

D

1.03

1.49

1.54

0

0.31

0.75

0.38

E

0.38

0.66

0.46

0.45

0

0.47

0.18

F

2.31

4.07

3.35

2.96

0.90

0

0.42

G

0.64

0.80

0.64

0.60

0.22

0.72

0

The top diagonal is the pairwise ϕST, and the bottom diagonal is the Slatkin distance. * A, B, C and D belong to the variety notatum; E, F and G, in general, belong to latiflorum; and F also includes var. saurae.

Morphological and molecular results from P. notatum

The PCA results indicated three main groups (Figure 7), which correspond to the three botanical varieties accepted by Parodi [36]. The features that contributed most to the morphological divergence between the groups were ALIB and LBL in principal component 1 (PC1) and SL and SW in principal component 2 (PC2), which together accounted for more than 55% of the detected variation. The group shown in dark green in the upper graph was botanically identified as var. latiflorum due to the size of its spikelets and the length of its inflorescence branches. However, the LBL and LBW were smaller than in other accessions that belong to var. latiflorum, which likely accounts for this difference. The results of the descriptive analysis (Additional files 8 and 9) and correspondence between informal Paspalum botanical groups and the STRUCTURE analysis groups (Additional file 10) are presented.

The correlation between the morphological traits and the SSR markers indicated a weak correlation between the morphological and molecular data (r = 0.42; p < 0.001).

Geographic distance and genetic dissimilarity in Paspalum notatum

The correlation between the geographic distance and the genetic similarity matrix was estimated for all the accessions and revealed no significant association between genetic and geographic variation based on r = 0.0017 for the Mantel test (Additional file 11).

Discussion

Microsatellite markers

The P. notatum and P. atratum marker sets revealed polymorphisms in many of the other Paspalum species analyzed, which suggests that they are useful in genetic analyses of the Paspalum genus.

Some SSRs were highly polymorphic among the evaluated loci, and according to Huang et al. [92], the correlation between the number of bands revealed per locus and the PIC value is equivalent to Nei’s gene diversity [93]. Testolin et al. [94] reported that highly polymorphic markers are promising for use in DNA fingerprinting to identify plant varieties or cultivars. We recommend that a subset of these loci be used in future fingerprinting studies, with a preference for loci that are easy to score and that exhibit high heterozygosity, as indicated by high PIC values.

The genetic structure of the three genetic groups was confirmed using an AMOVA, where 46.83% of the variation was explained by the division into the three groups (Table 7). This finding suggests that the different species could contain unique alleles or genotypes and that these data can discriminate between taxa, especially the more distant taxa. Similar results were obtained by Jungmann et al. [47], who found that 44% of the variation in apomictic Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweick accessions could be explained by the subdivision of the germplasm into five groups.
Table 7

AMOVA for the Paspalum accessions based on 187 SSR bands

Source of variation

d.f.

Sum of squares

Variance components

%variation

Pvalues

Among species

35

1296.14

5.67 Va

46.83

*

Within species

179

1132.83

6.44 Vb

53.17

*

Total

214

2428.97

12.10

  

*Significant difference with P < 0.05.

The proportion of detected polymorphisms decreased as the genetic distance increased. This finding corroborates other results previously obtained in both plant [61, 66] and animal studies [95]. We observed a reduced number of bands at some loci in species that were more distantly genetically related to the species for which the primers were designed (P. notatum and P. atratum). We suggest that this reduction might have been caused by the presence of null alleles or mutations that could have arisen in the primer-binding sites for the SSRs. Homoplasy has been frequently detected among cross-species-amplified SSR markers [96], and it tends to complicate the interpretation of SSR variations. Non-amplifying or null alleles are not commonly found in plant species, but some examples of these phenomena have been observed [97]. The occurrence of null alleles could cause heterozygotes to be confused with homozygotes, which are usually inferred from significant heterozygote deficits. Undetected null alleles in populations can have dramatic effects on the interpretation of genotype frequency distributions and could lead to mistaken interpretations about the level of inbreeding in a population [98]. Therefore, care should be taken when using the studied loci to analyze species that are distant from the Notata and Plicatula groups, as they could lead to incorrect estimates. However, all of the examined loci were generally useful as an initial approach for the evaluation of Paspalum germplasm, especially for species that were more genetically distant from P. atratum and P. notatum.

We observed the presence of exclusive bands between different varieties of P. notatum, which suggests that the use of these microsatellite markers can benefit taxonomic classification and breeding programs. These bands were not present in all the representatives of the same variety but were shared between accessions from the same gene pool. More detailed morphological and molecular characterizations of these groups should be performed to determine whether these characteristics are related to specific cultivars or biotypes, which we could not detect in our work.

Cluster analysis in the Paspalumgenus

Our data support the usefulness of SSRs as a tool for the identification of genetic diversity and global similarity among members of a species. Therefore, we adopted a phenetic approach, which evaluates the genetic similarities between individuals.

All of the analyses identified three main groups (Figures 1, 2 and 3). This trend toward the formation of three main groups could have resulted from the low representative numbers of some species and groups as well as the nature of the markers used. These markers tended to be more conserved in the more genetically distant species of taxa for which the primer sets were originally developed (P. notatum and P. atratum, from the Notata and the Plicatula groups, respectively).

In this study, the species of the Notata group that form the subgenus Paspalum are represented by five taxa (P. pumilum, P. notatum, P. subciliatum, P. cromyorhizon and P. ionanthum). The former two species were clearly distinguishable at the molecular level, whereas P. pumilum, P. notatum, P. subciliatum were grouped together. These results are in accordance with phylogenetic studies based on internal transcribed sequences (ITS) and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA), which support a close genetic relationship between P. pumilum, P. notatum and P. subciliatum[99101] (these species form a monophyletic clade). Moreover, whether P. cromyorhizon and P. ionanthum should be included in the subgenus Paspalum remains uncertain, but evidence provided by cpDNA sequences [99] supports a close relationship between these two species. P. pumilum, which is a sexual autogamous diploid species, showed less genetic divergence from P. notatum when compared with other species from the group. P. subciliatum exhibited a relatively intermediate degree of genetic divergence from the other species in the Notata group, whereas P. cromyorhizon and P. ionanthum were classified as being somewhat more distant from the other group members (Figures 1, 2 and 3).

In this study, the Plicatula group showed high genetic variability within its species, but there was no clear distinction between different species (Figures 1, 2 and 3). The lack of a clear delineation between the different taxa of the Plicatula group is most likely caused by the genetic closeness of these species as well as the interspecific hybridization that has occurred throughout their evolution, which favors allele sharing. The complexity of the Plicatula was described in a taxonomic review of this group [22]. Many species of the Plicatula group are morphologically polymorphic, including P. atratum, Paspalum plicatulum Michx., Paspalum compressifolium Swallen, and Paspalum limbatum Henrard. Oliveira [22] suggested that the current circumscription adopted for the separation of some species of the Plicatula group could include different taxa and that the pattern of evolution in the group is reticulated, with no well-defined morphological boundaries occurring between taxa. Although the species of this group have not been clearly delineated, the species of the Plicatula group were consistently grouped together in our analyses, with few exceptions. Polyploidy and hybridization are strategies that have played a role in the evolution of the species of the Plicatula group, as in most species of Paspalum, and should be accounted for when defining a species in this group. The species comprising the Plicatula group were considered to be those with populations that were formed by different co-specific cytotypes with at least a basic polyploid series of 2n = 20 or 40 [22].

Few conclusions could be made regarding the third main group, because it was composed of species from the other Paspalum botanical groups that were not included in the first two groups because of the small number of representative species. Previous molecular phylogenetic studies [99] have suggested a greater genetic distance between the third main group compared to the Plicatula and Notata groups, which explains the lower frequency of microsatellite polymorphisms observed for species from the third group. However, there was a clear distinction between the species of this group. Thus, the markers employed in this study have proven to be effective in distinguishing the different Paspalum species and can assist in the identification of distinct species when combined with other molecular techniques.

The accessions from subgenus Anachyris were grouped and presented a close genetic similarity to the species from the Paniculata group (Paspalum juergensii Hack. and Paspalum paniculatum L.) (Figures 2 and 3). Our results corroborate the monophyly of the subgenus Anachyris[99] and the existence of close genetic relationships between Anachyris and Paspalum falcatum Nees ex Steud. (Falcata), Paspalum paucifolium Swallen (Eriantha), Paspalum humboldtianum Flüggé (Subgenus Ceresia), Paspalum quarinii Morrone and Zuloaga (Quadrifaria), P. juergensii and P. paniculatum (Paniculata).

The Virgata and Dilatata groups represent species complexes that have been extensively studied and have been shown to be entirely composed of allopolyploid species based on cytogenetic evidence [27, 102112]. Paspalum conspersum Schrad., P. dilatatum and Paspalum pauciciliatum (Parodi) Herter exhibit genomic formulae of IIJ2J2, IIJJX and IIJJ, respectively (Additional file 3). The donor species for genome I is Paspalum intermedium Munro ex Morong (Quadrifaria group), and the donor species for genome J is P. juergensii (Paniculata group). Although the Dilatata group has the genomic formulae IIJJ (Additional file 3), the two species from this group included in this study were not genetically close to the Quadrifaria and Paniculata groups, which include the donor species for genomes I and J, respectively.

The classification of Paspalum into two informal groups is controversial. P. conspersum (Virgata) and Paspalum exaltatum J. Presl (Quadrifaria) clustered together in the UPGMA dendrogram (Figure 6) and were shown to be genetically related to Paspalum regnellii Mez (Virgata). The genetic proximity of these species corroborates previous phylogenetic studies [99, 113]. The Virgata group should be considered monophyletic, and a number of additional species, such as P. exaltatum, should be included in it [113]. Moreover, their data supported the idea that P. regnellii should be excluded from the Virgata group and included in the Macrophylla group.

Paspalum maritimum Trin. (Caespitosa) is considered to be allopolyploid, with a predominant bivalent chromosome pairing [114], and this species clustered close to P. conjugatum and Paspalum corcovadense Raddi. P. conjugatum and P. corcovadense were grouped on the basis of the dendrogram and were shown to be genetically distant from the other species studied, corroborating previous phylogenetic studies [99].

Diversity and population structure in Paspalum notatum

Population structure analysis using STRUCTURE software corroborates the most supported groups found in the UPGMA analysis. Group F is the most consistent group throughout all the analyses, and it corresponds to all the accessions from S. Tome (Argentina) (Figures 4, 5 and 6). The K = 7 analysis confirmed the differences among the genotypes that are dispersed throughout southern South America (Additional file 11). The methodology used to analyze the molecular data in this work has been successfully employed for understanding how genetic diversity is organized in other economically important crops [47, 115117].

Populations of predominantly apomictic grasses are predicted to exhibit low levels of within-population genetic variation due to founder effects and a lack of recombination in offspring, whereas high levels of differentiation among populations are expected because of the limited gene flow via pollen and the divergence of populations over time caused by selection, drift and the accumulation of new mutations [118]. Our work focused on evaluating the relationships between accessions, which could represent distinct populations. Consequently, we expected to detect a high level of differentiation between individuals due to reproductive and geographic isolation. However, a high level of differentiation between individuals was not observed for all the accessions, such as the accessions from gene pools C and D, which are widely distributed but are genetically close. Furthermore, some accessions showed a large amount of genetic variation, especially those derived from Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and Argentina. The studied species is widely distributed in the Americas, and Argentina is considered to be its center of origin [119]. The most widely distributed accessions of P. notatum most likely originated from a few apomictic individuals who were better adapted to different environmental conditions, as reported for Pennisetum setaceum, an apomictic grass that has an invasive capacity and can colonize large areas with only a single clone [120].

Moreover, P. notatum comprises sexual diploid and facultative apomictic tetraploid individuals, and diversity could be especially high in the apomictic species complexes that are derived from multiple, independent hybridization events. Gene flow in this species occurs between tetraploid and diploid cytotypes when they are in sympatry [44]; thus, diploid commercial cultivars can introduce variability into an apomictic complex. Furthermore, facultative apomictic tetraploid species can retain residual sexuality such that their occasional hybridization and genetic recombination introduces variability into natural populations. The better-adapted genotypes are then fixed via apomixis, which maintains the maternal genotype and heterozygosity through successive generations [121].

Morphological and molecular results in P. notatum

The great morphological variability of P. notatum in Brazil has been previously described [7, 37], and the morphological and genetic data reported here confirm these findings. Our genetic analyses show a weak correlation with phenotypic data, possibly as a consequence of the small number of morphological characters that we were able to use in this work, combined with the phenotypic plasticity of the morphological characteristics, which were mainly vegetative. Our results show that there is a tendency toward clustering the P. notatum accessions following the botanical variety classifications; however, our data could not confirm the informal intraspecific categories proposed by other authors because the morphological features employed to make these distinctions are continuous and often overlapping or are otherwise incapable of reflecting the total observed variation.

Using spikelet size as a diagnostic characteristic, Döll [41] described the variety latiflorum, which features spikelets that are orbicular-elliptical in shape and larger than the spikelets of the notatum variety. Paspalum notatum var. latiflorum Döll was previously accepted and cited by some authors [36, 42, 43], but this classification is not currently regarded as valid. Parodi [36] studied the variety latiflorum and proposed a new variety, P. notatum var. saurae, which is accepted and used to this day. To differentiate these varieties, Parodi [36] employed spikelet size and the length and number of inflorescence branches, which are diagnostic characteristics that exhibit little or no phenotypic plasticity. The morphological and molecular evidence obtained in this study supports the division of the species into three varieties because there is a strong tendency for accessions of the same variety to remain grouped into similar gene groups. Out of the seven distinct gene pools identified using Bayesian STRUCTURE software analysis, four represent the botanical variety notatum, and three pools correspond to the latiflorum variety.

Sexual diploid strains grow only in a limited area in Argentina, which is considered to be the center of origin for P. notatum[44, 45]. Some tetraploids that share the diploid gene pool might have maintained the genetic patterns of the Argentine diploid populations or might have arisen via independent self-polyploidization events. The diploid accessions (P. notatum var. saurae) were grouped into a single gene pool, which suggests that they share a common origin. These accessions could have derived from the cultivar Pensacola, which originated in Argentina [44, 119], which is in agreement with the existence of gene flow between tetraploid and diploid cytotypes of P. notatum when they are sympatric [44]. However, a group of tetraploid accessions from western Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and Uruguay that were botanically identified as P. notatum var. latiflorum share the same gene pool with P. notatum var. saurae.

According to Quarín [24], autotetraploid species of Paspalum might have appeared in a two-step process. Crossbreeding sexual diploids sometimes develop aposporous embryo sacs. Occasionally, an unreduced oosphere is fertilized by the reduced spermatic nuclei of a diploid, forming a triploid (2n, 2× + n = 3×). The triploids then produce offspring that, when fertilized by diploid pollen, give rise to tetraploid (2n, 3× + n = 4×) genotypes.

Geographic distance and genetic dissimilarity in Paspalum notatum

Our data suggest that there is no correlation between genetic dissimilarity and geographic distance among the P. notatum accessions. This arrangement might occur due to an apomixis and polyploidy-induced buffer that restrains the genetic status of the species and promotes the fixation of genetic fitness over a wide range of environments [45]. Moreover, the incongruence between the genetic and geographic data might also be a consequence of anthropogenic dispersal, because P. notatum is a turf and forage grass that is widely sown commercially and can be accidentally dispersed by cattle or other grazing animals. Although no correlation between genetic and geographical data was found in our analysis, a tendency for accessions from the same region to share the same gene pool was evident (Additional file 11).

Conclusions

In summary, our molecular genetic approach using cross-species amplification was proven to be useful for distinguishing the different taxa of Paspalum that were examined, with the exception of those that belong to the complex Plicatula group. The use of a molecular genetics approach that employs microsatellite markers in an initial assessment of germplasms was shown to be useful in species identification and in evaluating the possibility of successful species hybridization.

The methodological approach applied in this study allowed us to understand the genetic organization of different P. notatum genotypes. Comparing the genetic organization with the morphological characteristics provided evidence that supports the existence of three botanical varieties (P. notatum var. notatum, P. notatum var. saurae and P. notatum var. latiflorum[36]), which are represented by different gene groups, with few exceptions. However, the wide genetic variation within each variety deserves more detailed study. We suggest using the methodology that we have proposed in this work to aid in species classification, especially for plants that exhibit wide morphological variation and are difficult to identify. In addition, the microsatellites developed and used throughout this work can be employed for taxonomic classification, breeding programs and DNA fingerprinting for P. notatum cultivar identification.

Abbreviations

ALIB: 

Average length of inflorescence branches

AMOVA: 

Analysis of molecular variance

CTAB: 

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

GS: 

Genetic similarity

ISL: 

Inflorescence stem length

LBH: 

Leaf blade hairiness

LBL: 

Leaf blade length

LBW: 

Leaf blade width

LSL: 

Leaf sheath length

LSW: 

Leaf sheath width

PCA: 

Principal component analysis

PCO: 

Principal coordinate analysis

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PIC: 

Polymorphism information content

RS: 

Rio Grande do Sul state

SL: 

Spikelet length

SP: 

São Paulo state

SSR: 

Simple sequence repeat

SW: 

Spikelet width

UPGMA: 

Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean

USA: 

United States of America

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for financial support (Project No. 05/51010-0) and a graduate fellowship (2006/61242-8) awarded to F. W. Cidade. We also thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support and a research fellowship to A. P. Souza.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
(2)
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Southeast Livestock
(3)
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB
(4)
Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
(5)
Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios/APTA
(6)
Department of Botany, Prédio 43433, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
(7)
Department of Plant Biology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas (UNICAMP)

References

  1. Chase A: The North American species of Paspalum. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium. 1929, 28: 1-310.Google Scholar
  2. Clayton WD, Renvoize SA: Genera graminum: grasses of the world. 1986, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1-389.Google Scholar
  3. Zuloaga FO, Morrone O: Revisión de las especies de Paspalum para América del Sur Austral (Argentina, Bolivia, sur del Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay). Monogr Syst Bot Mo Bot Gard. 2005, 102: 1-297.Google Scholar
  4. Judziewicz EJ: Flora of the Guianas, 8. Edited by: RA A, Görts-van R. 1990, Königstein: Koltz Scientific Books, 1-727. Family 187. Poaceae (Gramineae), Series A: Phanerogams,Google Scholar
  5. Rua GH: Estudos filogenéticos em Paniceae: os casos de Paspalum e Digitaria. Anais do 57o Congresso Nacional de Botânica Os Avanços da Botânica no início do século XXI morfologia fisiologia taxonomia ecologia e genética. Edited by: Mariath JEA, Santos Porto Alegre RP. 2006, Brasi: Sociedade Botânica do, 170-173.Google Scholar
  6. Valls JFM: Recursos genéticos de espécies de Paspalum no Brasil. Encontro Internacional sobre melhoramento genético de Paspalum. 1987, Brasil: Nova Odessa, 3-13.Google Scholar
  7. Barreto IL: O gênero Paspalum (Gramineae) no Rio Grande do Sul. PhD thesis. 1974, Rio Grande do Su: Universidade FederalGoogle Scholar
  8. Canto-Dorow TS: Revisão taxonômica das espécies de Paspalum grupo Notata (Poaceae-Paniceae) do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia. 1996, 47: 3-44.Google Scholar
  9. Morrone O, Carbonó E: Revision del grupo Racemosa del genero Paspalum (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Paniceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1995, 82: 82-116. 10.2307/2399982.Google Scholar
  10. Morrone O, Vega A, Zuloaga FO: Revisión de las especies del género Paspalum (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Paniceae), grupo Dissecta (s. str.). Candollea. 1996, 51: 103-138.Google Scholar
  11. Morrone O, Denham SS, Aliscioni SS, Zuloaga FO: Revisión de las especies de Paspalum (Panicoideae: Paniceae), subgénero Anachyris. Candollea. 2000, 55: 105-135.Google Scholar
  12. Oliveira RC, Valls JFM: Taxonomia de Paspalum L., grupo Linearia (Gramineae-Paniceae) do Brasil. Rev Bras Bot. 2002, 25: 371-389. 10.1590/S0100-84042002012000001.Google Scholar
  13. Denham SS, Zuloaga FO, Morrone O: Systematic revision and phylogeny of Paspalum subgenus Ceresia (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Paniceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 2002, 89: 337-399. 10.2307/3298599.Google Scholar
  14. Denham SS: Revisión sistemática del subgénero Harpostachys de Paspalum (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Paniceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 2005, 92: 463-532.Google Scholar
  15. Rua GH, Aliscioni SS: A morphology-based cladistic analysis of Paspalum sect. Pectinata (Poaceae). Syst Bot. 2002, 27: 489-501.Google Scholar
  16. Zuloaga FO, Pensiero J, Morrone O: Systematics of Paspalum group Notata (Poaceae- panicoideae- Paniaceae). Syst Bot Monogr. 2004, 71: 1-75.Google Scholar
  17. Burson BL, Bennett HW: Chromosome numbers, microsporogenesis, and mode of reproduction of seven Paspalum species. Crop Sci. 1971, 11: 292-294. 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100020038x.Google Scholar
  18. Evers GW, Burson BL: Dallisgrass and other Paspalum species. Warm-Season (C 4) Grasses, Agronomy Monographs 45. Edited by: Moser L, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE M. 2004, 681-713. ASA, CSSA, and SSSAGoogle Scholar
  19. Gates RN, Quarín CL, Gates RN, Quarín CL, Pedreira CGS: Bahiagrass. Warm-Season (C 4) Grasses, Agronomy Monographs 45. Edited by: Moser L, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE M. 2004, 651-680. ASA, CSSA, and SSSAGoogle Scholar
  20. De Wet JMJ, Prasada Rao KE, Mengesha MH, Brink DE: Diversity in Kodo Millet. Paspalum scrobiculatum. Economic Botany. 1983, 37: 159-163. 10.1007/BF02858779.Google Scholar
  21. Duncan RR, Carrow RN: Seashore Paspalum: the environmental turfgrass. 2000, Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons, 281-Google Scholar
  22. Oliveira RC: O gênero Paspalum L., grupo Plicatula (Poaceae: Paniceae), no Brasil. PhD thesis. 2004, Universidade Estadual de CampinasGoogle Scholar
  23. Pagliarini MS, Carraro LR, Freitas PM, Adamowski EV, Batista LAR, Valls JFM: Cytogenetic characterization of Brazilian Paspalum accessions. Hereditas. 2001, 135: 27-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Quarín CL: The nature of apomixis and its origin in Panicoid grasses. Apomixis Newsl. 1992, 5: 8-15.Google Scholar
  25. Burton GW: A cytological study of some species in the genus Paspalum. J Agric Res. 1940, 60: 193-197.Google Scholar
  26. Norrmann GA, Quarín CL, Burson BL: Cytogenetics and reproductive behavior of different chromosome races in six Paspalum species. J Hered. 1989, 80: 24-28.Google Scholar
  27. Honfi AI, Quarin CL, Valls JFM: Karyological studies in South American grasses. Darwiniana. 1990, 30: 87-94.Google Scholar
  28. Norrmann GA, Quarin CL, Killeen TJ: Chromosome numbers in Bolivian grasses (Gramineae). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1994, 81: 768-10.2307/2399921.Google Scholar
  29. Norrmann GA, Bovo OA, Quarín CL: Post-zygotic seed abortion in sexual diploid × apomictic tetraploid intraspecific Paspalum crosses. Aust J Bot. 1994, 42: 449-10.1071/BT9940449.Google Scholar
  30. Quarín CL, Pozzobon MT, Valls JFM: Cytology and reproductive behavior of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid germplasm accessions of a wild forage grass: Paspalum compressifolium. Euphytica. 1996, 90: 345-349. 10.1007/BF00027486.Google Scholar
  31. Pozzobon MT, Valls JFM: Chromosome number in Brazilian germplasm accessions of Paspalum hydrophilum, P. modestum and P. palustre (Gramineae; Paniceae). Genet Mol Biol. 2003, 26: 365-36. 10.1590/S1415-47572003000300023.Google Scholar
  32. Pozzobon MT, Machado ACC, Vaio M, Valls JFM, Peñaloza APS, Santos S, Côrtes AL, Rua GH: Cytogenetic analyses in Paspalum L. reveal new diploid species and accessions. Cienc Rural. 2008, 38: 1292-1299. 10.1590/S0103-84782008000500014.Google Scholar
  33. Quarin CL, Espinoza F, Martinez EJ, Pessino SC, Bovo OA: A rise of ploidy level induces the expression of apomixis in Paspalum notatum. Sex Plant Reprod. 2001, 13: 243-249. 10.1007/s004970100070.Google Scholar
  34. Quarín CL, Norrmann GA: Interspecific hybrids between five Paspalum species. Bot Gaz. 1990, 151: 366-369. 10.1086/337837.Google Scholar
  35. Vaio M, Speranza P, Valls JFM, Guerra M, Mazzella C: Localization of the 5S and 45S rDNA sites and cpDNA sequence analysis in species of the Quadrifaria group of Paspalum (Poaceae, Paniceae). Ann Bot. 2005, 96: 191-200. 10.1093/aob/mci168.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Parodi LR: Gramíneas Argentinas nuevas o críticas. I. La variacíon en Paspalum notatum Flügge. Rev Argent Agronomía. 1948, 15: 53-57.Google Scholar
  37. Canto-Dorow TS: Revisão taxonômica das espécies sul-riograndenses de Paspalum L. (grupo Notata) Poaceae - Paniceae, com ênfase na análise da variação intra-específica de Paspalum notatum Flügge. 1993, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: Msc dissertationGoogle Scholar
  38. Burton GW: Bahiagrass types. J Am Soc Agron. 1946, 38: 273-281. 10.2134/agronj1946.00021962003800030008x.Google Scholar
  39. Burton GW: The method of reproduction in common bahiagrass. Paspalum notatum. J Am Soc Agron. 1948, 40: 443-452. 10.2134/agronj1948.00021962004000050008x.Google Scholar
  40. Forbes I, Burton GW: Cytology of diploids, natural and induced tetraploids and intraspecies hybrids of bahiagrass, Paspalum notatum Fluegge. Crop Sci. 1961, 1: 402-406. 10.2135/cropsci1961.0011183X000100060006x.Google Scholar
  41. Döll JC: Gramineae II. Flora brasiliensis. Edited by: Martius CFP, Eichler AW, Monachii F. 1877, Fleischer, 276-296.Google Scholar
  42. Rosengurtt B, Arrelliga BR, Izaguirre P: Gramíneas uruguayas. 1970, Universidad de la República: MontevideoGoogle Scholar
  43. Lombardo A: Flora montevidensis. 1984, Montivideo: Intendencia Municipal de MontevideoGoogle Scholar
  44. Daurelio LD, Espinoza F, Quarin CL, Pessino SC: Genetic diversity in sexual diploid and apomictic tetraploid populations of Paspalum notatum situated in sympatry or allopatry. Plant Syst Evol. 2004, 244: 189-199. 10.1007/s00606-003-0070-6.Google Scholar
  45. Espinoza F, Daurelio LD, Pessino SC, Valle EM, Quarin CL: Genetic characterization of Paspalum notatum accessions by AFLP markers. Plant Syst Evol. 2006, 258: 147-159. 10.1007/s00606-005-0401-x.Google Scholar
  46. Speranza PR: Evolutionary patterns in the Dilatata group (Paspalum, Poaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2009, 282: 43-56. 10.1007/s00606-009-0205-5.Google Scholar
  47. Jungmann L, Vigna BBZ, Boldrini KR, Sousa ACB, Do Valle CB, Resende RMS, Pagliarini MS, Zucchi MI, DeSouza AP: Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of the tropical pasture grass Brachiaria humidicola based on microsatellites, cytogenetics, morphological traits, and geographical origin. Genome. 2010, 53: 698-709. 10.1139/G10-055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Oliveira RP, Borba EL, Longhi-Wagner HM, Pereira ACS, Lambert SM: Genetic and morphological variability in the Raddia brasiliensis complex (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Plant Syst Evol. 2008, 274: 25-35. 10.1007/s00606-008-0034-y.Google Scholar
  49. Cidade FW, Dall’Agnol M, Bered F, Souza-Chies TT: Genetic diversity of the complex Paspalum notatum Flügge (Paniceae: Panicoideae). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2008, 55: 235-246. 10.1007/s10722-007-9231-8.Google Scholar
  50. Pazos-Navarro M, Dabauza M, Correal E, Hanson K, Teakle N, Real D, Nelson MN: Next generation DNA sequencing technology delivers valuable genetic markers for the genomic orphan legume species Bituminaria bituminosa. BMC Genet. 2011, 12: 104-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Santos-Garcia MO, Karia CT, Resende RMS, Chiari L, Vieira MLC, Zucchi MI, Souza AP: Identification of Stylosanthes guianensis varieties using molecular genetic analysis. AoB PLANTS. 2012, pls001-10.1093/aobpla/pls001.Google Scholar
  52. Esselman EJ, Jianqiang L, Crawford DJ, Windus JL, Wolfe AD: Clonal diversity in the rare Calamagrostis porteri ssp. insperata (Poaceae): comparative results for allozymes and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Mol Ecol. 1999, 8: 443-451. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00585.x.Google Scholar
  53. Assefa K, Merker A, Tefera H: Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis of genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef(Zucc.) Trotter]. Hereditas. 2003, 139: 174-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Arnaud-Haond S, Alberto F, Teixeira S, Procaccini G, Serrão EA, Duarte CM: Assessing genetic diversity in clonal organisms: low diversity or low resolution? Combining power and cost efficiency in selecting markers. J Hered. 2005, 96: 434-40. 10.1093/jhered/esi043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Morgante M, Olivieri AM: PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. Plant J. 1993, 3: 175-82. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00020.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu Z, Jarret R, Kresovich S, Duncan RR: Characterization and analysis of simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz). Theor Appl Genet. 1995, 91 (1): 47-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Speranza P, Malosetti M: Nuclear and cytoplasmic microsatellite markers for the species of the Dilatata group of Paspalum (Poaceae). Plant Genet Resour. 2007, 5: 14-26. 10.1017/S1479262107192145.Google Scholar
  58. Cidade FW, Souza-Chies TT, Batista LAR, Dall’agnol M, Zucchi MI, Jungmann L, Souza AP: Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Paspalum notatum Flüggé (Poaceae). Conserv Genet. 2009, 10: 1977-1980. 10.1007/s10592-009-9872-6.Google Scholar
  59. Cidade FW, Souza-Chies TT, Souza FHD, Batista LAR, Dall’Agnol M, Valls JFM, Zucchi MI, Souza AP: Microsatellite loci for Paspalum atratum (Poaceae) and cross-amplification in other species. Am J Bot. 2010, 97: e107-e110. 10.3732/ajb.1000207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Byrne M, Marquez-Garcia MI, Uren T, Smith DS, Moran GF: Conservation and genetic diversity of microsatellite loci in the genus Eucalyptus. Aust J Bot. 1996, 44: 331-341. 10.1071/BT9960331.Google Scholar
  61. Steinkellner H, Lexer C, Turetschek E, Glossl J: Conservation of (GA)n microsatellite loci between Quercus species. Mol Ecol. 1997, 6: 1189-1194. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00288.x.Google Scholar
  62. Peakall R, Gilmore S, Keys W, Morgante M, Rafalski A: Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) within the genus and other legume genera: implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 1998, 15: 1275-87. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Roa AC, Chavarriaga-Aguirre P, Duque MC, Maya MM, Bonierbale MW, Iglesias C, Tohme J: Cross-species amplification of cassava (Manihot esculenta)(Euphorbiaceae) microsatellites: allelic polymorphism and degree of relationship. Am J Bot. 2000, 87: 1647-1655. 10.2307/2656741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Dirlewanger E, Cosson P, Tavaud M, Aranzana J, Poizat C, Zanetto A, Arús P, Laigret F: Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 105: 127-138. 10.1007/s00122-002-0867-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hempel K, Peakall R: Cross-species amplification from crop soybean Glycine max provides informative microsatellite markers for the study of inbreeding wild relatives. Genome. 2003, 46: 382-93. 10.1139/g03-013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. González-Martínez SC, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Collada C, Díaz A, Williams CG, Alía R, Cervera MT: Cross-amplification and sequence variation of microsatellite loci in Eurasian hard pines. Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 109: 103-11. 10.1007/s00122-004-1596-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Poncet V, Hamon P, Minier J, Carasco C, Hamon S, Noirot M: SSR cross-amplification and variation within coffee trees (Coffea spp.). Genome. 2004, 47: 1071-81. 10.1139/g04-064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987, 19: 11-15.Google Scholar
  69. Billotte N, Lagoda PJL, Risterucci AM, Baurens FC: Microsatellite-enriched libraries: applied methodology for the development of SSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits. 1999, 54: 277-288.Google Scholar
  70. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS: “Touchdown” PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19 (14): 4008-10.1093/nar/19.14.4008.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu KS, Tanksley SD: Abundance, polymorphism and genetic mapping of microsatellites in rice. Mol Gen Genet. 1993, 241–241: 225-235.Google Scholar
  72. Cordeiro GM, Pan Y, Henry RJ: Sugarcane microsatellites for the assessment of genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm. Plant Sci. 2003, 165: 181-189. 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00157-2.Google Scholar
  73. Dice LR: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945, 26: 297-302. 10.2307/1932409.Google Scholar
  74. Jaccard P: Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat. 1908, 44: 223-270.Google Scholar
  75. Rohlf FJ: NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. 2000, New York: Exeter SoftwareGoogle Scholar
  76. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR: Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. 1973, San Francisco: Freeman, 573-Google Scholar
  77. Mantel N: The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967, 27: 209-220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP: DARwin software. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author. 2006, http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin/Home.php,Google Scholar
  79. Rambaut A: FigTree. 2009, ver. 1.3.1Google Scholar
  80. Coelho ASG: BOOD-Avaliação de dendrogramas baseados em estimativas de distâncias/similaridades genéticas através do procedimento de bootstrap, Versão 3.0. 2001, UFG: Laboratório Genética Vegetal, DBG/ICBGoogle Scholar
  81. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000, 155: 945-59.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003, 164: 1567-87.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007, 7: 574-578. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J: Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14: 2611-20. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Earl DA, VonHoldt BM: STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2011, online firstGoogle Scholar
  86. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S: Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinformatics. 2005, 1: 47-50.Google Scholar
  87. Cidade FW: Análise da variabilidade genética de Paspalum notatum Flügge (Poaceae, Panicoideae) com o uso de marcadores moleculares, morfológicos e citometria de fluxo. 1974, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: Msc dissertationGoogle Scholar
  88. Cruz CD: Programa Genes - versão Windows: aplicativo computacional em genética e estatística. [http://www.ufv.br/dbg/genes/genes.htm]
  89. STATISTICA software, version 7.0. [http://www.statsoft.com/support/download]
  90. Ersts PJ: Geographic Distance Matrix Generator, version 1.2.3. [http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/gdmg]
  91. Hijmans R, Guarino L: Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genet Resour Newsl. 2001, 127: 15-19.Google Scholar
  92. Huang Q, Börner A, Röder S, Ganal W: Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 105: 699-707. 10.1007/s00122-002-0959-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Nei M: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1973, 70: 3321-3. 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Testolin R, Marrazzo T, Cipriani G, Quarta R, Verde I, Dettori MT, Pancaldi M, Sansavini S: Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome. 2000, 43: 512-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Primmer CR, Møller AP, Ellegren H: A wide-range survey of cross-species microsatellite amplification in birds. Mol Ecol. 1996, 5: 365-378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Park YJ, Lee JK, Kim NS: Simple sequence repeat polymorphisms (SSRPs) for evaluation of molecular diversity and germplasm classification of minor crops. Molecules. 2009, 14: 4546-69. 10.3390/molecules14114546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Sousa SN, Finkeldey R, Gailing O: Experimental verification of microsatellite null alleles in Norway Spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.): implications for population genetic studies. Plant Mol Biol. 2005, 23: 113-119. 10.1007/BF02772701.Google Scholar
  98. Pemberton JM, Slate J, Bancroft DR, Barrett JA: Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies. Mol Ecol. 1995, 4: 249-252. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00214.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Rua GH, Speranza PR, Vaio M, Arakaki M: A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Paspalum (Poaceae) based on cpDNA and morphology. Plant Syst Evol. 2010, 288: 227-243. 10.1007/s00606-010-0327-9.Google Scholar
  100. Souza-Chies TT, Essi L, Rua GH, Valls JFM, Miz RB: A preliminary approach to the phylogeny of the genus Paspalum (Poaceae). Genetica. 2006, 126: 15-32. 10.1007/s10709-005-1428-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Essi L, Souza-Chies TT: Phylogeny of Linearia and Notata groups of Paspalum L. (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae) and related species. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2006, 54: 779-791.Google Scholar
  102. Burson BL, Lee H, Bennett HW: Genome relations between tetraploid Paspalum dilatatum and four diploid Paspalum species. Crop Sci. 1973, 13: 739-743. 10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060045x.Google Scholar
  103. Burson BL: Genome relations between Paspalum conspersum and two diploid Paspalum species. Can J Genet Cytol. 1978, 20: 365-372.Google Scholar
  104. Burson BL: Phylogenetic investigations of Paspalum dilatatum and related species. Proceedings of the 14 th International Grassland Congress. Edited by: Smith JA, Hays VW B. 1983, Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  105. Burson BL: Cytogenetics of Paspalum urvillei X P. intermedium and P. dilatatum X P. paniculatum hybrids. Crop Sci. 1979, 19: 534-538. 10.2135/cropsci1979.0011183X001900040025x.Google Scholar
  106. Burson BL: Homology of chromosomes of the X genomes in common and Uruguayan dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum. Genome. 1991, 34: 950-953. 10.1139/g91-147.Google Scholar
  107. Burson BL: Genome relationships between tetraploid and hexaploid biotypes of dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum. Bot Gaz. 1991, 152a: 219-223.Google Scholar
  108. Burson BL: Genome relationship and reproductive behavior of intraspecific Paspalum dilatatum hybrids: Yellow-Anthered x Uruguaiana. Int J Plant Sci. 1995, 156: 326-331. 10.1086/297254.Google Scholar
  109. Burson BL, Bennett HW: Cytogenetics of Paspalum conspersum and its genomic relationship with yellow-anthered P. dilatatum and P. malacophyllum. Can J Genet Cytol. 1976, 18: 701-708.Google Scholar
  110. Burson BL, Quarín CL: Cytology of Paspalum virgatum and its relationship with P. intermedium and P. jurgensii. Can J Genet Cytol. 1982, 24: 219-226.Google Scholar
  111. Caponio I, Quarín CL: Intra-and interspecific hybridization between dallisgrass and vaseygrass. Crop Sci. 1990, 30: 362-364. 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020023x.Google Scholar
  112. Quarín CL, Caponio I: Cytogenetics and reproduction of Paspalum dasypleurum and its hybrids with P. urvillei and P. dilatatum ssp. flavescens. Int J Plant Sci. 1995, 156: 232-235. 10.1086/297245.Google Scholar
  113. Giussani LM, Zuloaga FO, Quarín CL, Cota-Sánchez JH, Ubayasena K, Morrone O: Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Paspalum (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Paniceae): an assessment of the Quadrifaria and Virgata informal groups. Syst Bot. 2009, 34: 32-43. 10.1600/036364409787602258.Google Scholar
  114. Adamowski EV, Pagliarini MS, Batista LAR: Chromosome number and microsporogenesis in Paspalum maritimum (Caespitosa group; gramineae). Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2000, 43: 301-305. 10.1590/S1516-89132000000300009.Google Scholar
  115. Liu K, Goodman M, Muse S, Smith JS, Buckler E, Doebley J: Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics. 2003, 165: 2117-28.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT: Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theor Appl Genet. 2006, 112: 1519-31. 10.1007/s00122-006-0255-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Kwak M, Gepts P: Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 118: 979-92. 10.1007/s00122-008-0955-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Carino DA, Daehler CC: Genetic variation in an apomictic grass, Heteropogon contortus, in the Hawaiian Islands. Mol Ecol. 1999, 8: 2127-2132. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00786.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Burton GW: A search for the origin of Pensacola Bahia grass. Econ Bot. 1967, 21: 379-382. 10.1007/BF02863165.Google Scholar
  120. Poulin J, Weller SG, Sakai AK: Genetic diversity does not affect the invasiveness of fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Arizona, California and Hawaii. Divers Distrib. 2005, 11: 241-247. 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00136.x.Google Scholar
  121. Kellogg EA: Variation and species limits in agamospermous grasses. Syst Bot. 1990, 15: 112-123. 10.2307/2419021.Google Scholar
  122. Pagliarini MS, Takayama SY, Freitas PM, Carraro LR, Adamowski EV, Silva N, Batista LAR: Failure of cytokinesis and 2n gamete formation in Brazilian accessions of Paspalum. Euphytica. 1999, 108: 129-135. 10.1023/A:1003660327223.Google Scholar
  123. Adamowski EV, Pagliarini MS, Bonato ABM, Batista LAR, Valls JFM: Chromosome numbers and meiotic behavior of some Paspalum accessions. Genet Mol Biol. 2005, 28: 773-780. 10.1590/S1415-47572005000500020.Google Scholar
  124. Takayama SY, Freitas PM, Pagliarini MS, Batista LAR: Chromosome number in germplasm accessions of Paspalum (Plicatula group) from different regions in Brazil. Euphytica. 1998, 99: 89-94. 10.1023/A:1018336200053.Google Scholar
  125. Pozzobon MT, Valls JFM: Cytogeography and variation of stomatal size of Paspalum glaucescens (Gramineae; Paniceae) in Southern Brazil. Euphytica. 2000, 116: 251-256. 10.1023/A:1004005230300.Google Scholar
  126. Dahmer N, Schifino-Wittmann MT, Dall’Agnol M, Castro B: Cytogenetic data for Paspalum notatum Flüggé accessions. Sci Agric. 2008, 65: 381-388. 10.1590/S0103-90162008000400009.Google Scholar
  127. Moraes-Fernandes MIB, Barreto IL, Salzano FM, Sacchet AMOF: Cytological and evolutionary relationships in Brazilian forms of Paspalum (Gramineae). Caryologia. 1974, 27 (4): 455-464.Google Scholar
  128. Quarín CL: Híbridos interespecíficos de Paspalum notatum x P. modestum. Bonplandia. 1983, V: 235-242.Google Scholar
  129. Quarín CL: Recuentos cromosómicos en gramíneas de Argentina Subtropical. Hickenia. 1977, 1: 73-78.Google Scholar
  130. Mehra PN, Chaudhary JD: Male meiosis in some grasses of the tribe Paniceae from North Eastern India. I. Genus Paspalum. Cytologia. 1981, 46: 265-278.Google Scholar
  131. Soster M: Caracterização morfológica e citogenética de acessos de Paspalum coletados no sul do Brasil. 2009, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina: PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  132. Bashaw EC, Forbes JR: chromosome numbers and microsporogenesis in Dallisgrass Paspalum dilatatum Poir1. Agron J. 1958, 50: 441-445. 10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000080006x.Google Scholar
  133. Bashaw EC, Hovin AW, Hold EC: Apomixis, its evolutionary significance and ulitization in plant breeding. Proceedings of the XI International Grassland Congress. Edited by: Norman MJT. 1970, Queensland, Australia: St. Lucia, 245-242.Google Scholar
  134. Burson BL: Cytogenetic relationships between Paspalum jurgensii and P. intermedium, P. vaginatum, and P. setaceum var. ciliatifolium. Crop Sci. 1981, 21: 515-519. 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100040009x.Google Scholar
  135. Hojsgaard D, Honfi AI, Rua G, Daviña J: Chromosome numbers and ploidy levels of Paspalum species from subtropical South America (Poaceae). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2009, 56: 533-545. 10.1007/s10722-008-9384-0.Google Scholar
  136. Pozzobon M: Chromosome counts in Brazilian species of Paspalum L. (Gramineae). Acta Bot Bras. 2000, 14: 151-162.Google Scholar
  137. Gould FW: Chromosome numbers in southwestern grasses. Am J Bot. 1958, 45: 757-767. 10.2307/2439737.Google Scholar
  138. Gould FW: Chromosome numbers of Texas grasses. Can J Bot. 1968, 46: 1315-1325. 10.1139/b68-175.Google Scholar
  139. Hojsgaard D, Schegg E, Valls JFM, Martínez E, Quarín CL: Sexuality, apomixis, ploidy levels, and genomic relationships among four Paspalum species of the subgenus Anachyris (Poaceae). Flora. 2008, 203: 535-547. 10.1016/j.flora.2007.09.005.Google Scholar
  140. Burson BL, Hussey MA: Cytology of Paspalum malacophyllum and its relationship to P. juergensii and P. dilatatum. Int J Plant Sci. 1998, 159: 153-159. 10.1086/297533.Google Scholar
  141. Quarín CL, Hanna WW: Chromosome behavior, embryo sac development, and fertility of Paspalum modestum, P. boscianum, and P. conspersum. J Hered. 1980, 71: 419-422.Google Scholar
  142. Quarín CL, Burson BL: Cytology of sexual and apomictic Paspalum species. Cytologia. 1991, 56: 223-228. 10.1508/cytologia.56.223.Google Scholar
  143. Martínez EJ, Quarín CL: Citoembriologia y comportamiento reproductivo de un citotipo diploide de Paspalum hydrophilum y sus hibridos con P. palustre (Poaceae, Paniceae). Darwiniana. 1999, 37: 223-228.Google Scholar
  144. Burson BL, Bennett HW: Meiotic and reproductive behavior of some introduced Paspalum species. J Miss Acad Sci. 1971, 17: 5-8.Google Scholar
  145. Pozzobon MT, Valls JFM: Caracterização citogenética em acessos de germoplasma de espécies brasileiras de Paspalum (Gramineae). Encontro Internacional sobre melhoramento genético de Paspalum. 1987, Nova Odessa, 73-78.Google Scholar
  146. Burton GW: The method of reproduction in common Bahia grass, Paspalum notatum. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy. 1948, 40: 443-452. 10.2134/agronj1948.00021962004000050008x.Google Scholar
  147. Burson BL: Genome relations among four diploid Paspalum species. Bot Gaz. 1981, 142: 592-596. 10.1086/337261.Google Scholar
  148. Burton GW: Breeding Pensacola bahiagrass, Paspalum notatum: I. Method of reproduction. Agron J. 1955, 47: 311-314.Google Scholar
  149. Quarín CL, Burson BL: Cytogenetic relations among Paspalum notatum var. saurae, P. pumilum, P. indecorum, and P. vaginatum. Bot Gaz. 1983, 144: 433-438. 10.1086/337394.Google Scholar
  150. Quarín CL, Hanna WW, Fernández A: Genetic studies in diploid and tetraploid Paspalum species. J Hered. 1982, 72: 254-256.Google Scholar
  151. Quarín CL, Burson BL, Burton GW: Cytology of intra- and interspecific hybrids between two cytotypes of Paspalum notatum and P. cromyorrhizon. Bot Gaz. 1984, 145: 420-426. 10.1086/337474.Google Scholar
  152. Quarin CL, Norrmann GA: Cytology and reproductive behavior of Paspalum equitans, P. ionanthum, and their hybrids with diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of P. cromyorrhizon. Bot Gaz. 1987, 148: 386-391. 10.1086/337667.Google Scholar
  153. Burson BL, Bennett HW: Cytology and reproduction of three Paspalum species. J Hered. 1970, 61: 129-132.Google Scholar
  154. Sede S, Escobar A, Morrone O, Zuloaga FO: Chromosome studies in American Paniceae (Poaceae, Panicoideae) 1. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 2010, 97: 128-138. 10.3417/2007118.Google Scholar
  155. Quarín CL, Valls JFM, Urbani MH: Cytological and reproductive behaviour of Paspalum atratum, a promising forage grass for the tropics. Trop Grassl. 1997, 31: 114-116.Google Scholar
  156. Rodrigues LG, Santos S, Oliveira RC, Peñaloza APS: Contagens cromossômicas em espécies brasileiras de Paspalum (Gramineae). Anais do III Simpósio de Recursos Genéticos para a América Latina e Caribe. 2001, Londrina, 395-397.Google Scholar
  157. Burton GW: A cytological study of some species in the tribe Paniceae. Am J Bot. 1942, 29: 355-360. 10.2307/2437217.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Cidade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.