Open Access

High-throughput sequencing of methylated cytosine enriched by modification-dependent restriction endonuclease MspJI

  • Xiaojun Huang1, 2,
  • Hanlin Lu1,
  • Jun-Wen Wang1,
  • Liqin Xu1, 3,
  • Siyang Liu1,
  • Jihua Sun1 and
  • Fei Gao1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Genetics201314:56

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-56

Received: 14 November 2012

Accepted: 13 June 2013

Published: 18 June 2013

Abstract

Background

As a well-known epigenomic modification, DNA methylation is found to be common in plants and plays an important role in many biological processes. Relying on the unique feature of methylation-dependent digestion, the family of methylation-requiring restriction-like endonuclease, such as MspJI and its homologs, was suggested for a potential usage in methylation detection.

Results

In this study, we combine MspJI digestion and electrophoretic band selection with next generation high-throughput sequencing technology to detect 5-methylcytosines in Arabidopsis genome. By developing a bioinformatics workflow to attribute the CNNR sites recognized by MspJI to the reference genome, we fulfilled the systematic assessment of this method.

Conclusions

According to the assessment, here we provide the method for generating a detailed map of plant methylome that could be feasible, reliable and economical in methylation investigation.

Keywords

MspJI DNA methylation Arabidopsis

Background

DNA methylation occurs in all domains of life, from viruses to cellular organisms, serving for DNA protection in prokaryotes and regulation of gene expression in plants and animals [13]. DNA methylation in plants differs from that in mammals. In mammalian cells, methylation mainly occurs on the cytosines in CpG context, although non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells as well [4]. While in plants, methylation occurs in both CpG and non-CpG contexts [5]. Besides, plant genomes are normally much larger than mammalian ones and contain a lot of repetitive sequences. Although the gold standard method whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) can be used to examine DNA methylation in single-base resolution, it requires large volume of sequencing data for confident DNA methylation calling. As a result, using WGBS for plant methylome profiling would be extremely costly. Thus, it is essential to develop a high-resolution and cost-effective methodology that can enrich the methylated sites, and accurately detect DNA methylation in plants.

In 2010, a unique family of methylation-requiring restriction-like (Mrr-like) endonucleases composed of MspJI and its homologs was reported in prokaryotes, and previous studies showed that their methylation-dependent digestion may protect host DNA against invading DNA [6]. Researchers announced that even if MspJI and its homologs are different in recognizing sites, similarities in cutting features are obvious such as the low frequency wobble by 1 base and a higher efficiency of enzyme digestion in the presence of oligonucleotide activators [6]. MspJI recognizes 5-methylcytosine (5 mC) in the context of mCNNR (R = G or A) and introduces double-stranded breaks at fixed distances-N12∕N16 on the 3’ side of the mC, leaving a four-base 5’ overhang. Since mC lies in certain distance from the terminal of the digested fragments, the MspJI family of restriction enzymes digestion combined with deep sequencing can reveal credible methylation information in a genome, which has been demonstrated [7].

Theoretically, up to half of the total methylcytosines can be recognized by MspJI in a genome, which provides the possibility of interrogating enzyme-enrichment with high-throughput sequencing to decipher the representative DNA methylome in plants. In this study, we used MspJI as a representative of the enzyme family to recognize and enrich 5 mCs in the genome of model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We size-selected the generated DNA fragments from MspJI digestion on agarose gel that may account for 25.03% of the total 5 mCs, including the majority of symmetrical mCNNR sites and a portion of the asymmetrical mCNNR sites, and used Illumina HiSeq2000 genome sequencer to sequence the enriched fragments. Especially, we developed corresponding bioinformatics tools for the analysis of mapping and recognition of 5 mCs in the enriched fragments. We compared our data with the methylome data generated by WGBS technology to assess this method, and further addressed the characteristics of Arabidopsis methylome which were in agreement with previous studies [8, 9]. We thus comprehensively assessed the method for DNA methylation detection based on methylation-dependent MspJI digestion by characterizing the different types of sequence contexts enriched and analyzing the difference between the common CpG methylation and non-CpG methylation like mCHG and mCHH in plants. We further reason that combining multiple MspJI-like enzymes can allow recognition of a wider set of methylated sites. The DNA modification of hydroxymethylation can also be detected through MspJI-seq based on glycosylation treatment, Thus these modification-dependent restriction endonucleases of MspJI family are thought to be promising in future epigenetic studies.

Results

Simulation of enzymatic digestion on Arabidopsis thalianaby methylation- dependent restriction endonuclease MspJI

Based on the former study in recognition specificities of the MspJI enzyme [7], we performed in silico analysis to simulate MspJI digestion on the Arabidopsis genome. In approximate calculation, CNNR loci account for 49% of the total cytosines in Arabidopsis genome, assuming they are all methylated. We also applied the in silico simulation to the rice genome and more than 50% of the methylated cytosines are also enriched, indicating that our method is feasible for application in other plants.

Depending on the distance between the two closest mCNNR sites and whether the methylated cytosines in these sites are symmetrically or asymmetrically located on the DNA double strands, the enzyme cleavage will occur in different scenarios. Especially, the results of competing cleavage will be decided by the cutting order and the interaction between the two recognition contexts [7], thus it’s difficult to simulate all the possible cleavage products. Here we describe six main cleavage scenarios occuring in mCNNR sites in both CpG and non-CpG contexts (See Methods and Additional file 1. The script of pipeline was uploaded to SourceForge). With this simulation, we calculated the number of potential MspJI recognition sites and found that at least 10.72 M cytosines in fragments ranging from 28 bp to 35 bp can be extracted from the genomic DNA of Arabidopsis by MspJI digestion (Two-way cleavage, Additional file 1E, 1F), representing 25.03% of the total 42.86 M cytosines in Arabidopsis genome (Table 1). Typically, if MspJI recognizes symmetrically methylated cytosines like mCpG or mCHG sites, the cleavages will result in DNA fragments in length of 32 bp or 31 bp respectively, with methylated sites in the middle [7]. Based on this simulation, we size-selected the major bands approximately ranging from 28-35 bp for library construction and sequencing, in order to profile the representative methylated cytosines in Arabidopsis genome. In concern with the mapping problem of these 28-35 bp short sequences, we further simulated the re-alignment of these selected fragments to the reference genome. Averagely more than 99.842% or 90.875% of the fragments can be mapped totally or uniquely back to the genome, respectively, ensuring a high mapping efficiency (Additional file 2).
Table 1

The typical sites in two-way cleavage scenarios

Typical sites

Fragments' length(bp)

Sites’ number in Arabidopsisgenome

CNNR type

YNCGNR

32

628107

Total 4194480

Symmetrical CGNR

YCHGR

31

840155

Symmetrical CHGR

CHHG

30

2726218

Symmetrical CHHG

CYHAG

29

452582

Total 1169473

Symmetrical CHHRG

CHYAHG

28

385221

Symmetrical CHHRNG

TDDGCHHA

34

168028

symmetrical YNNGCNNR

TDDGNCHHA

35

163642

Symmetrical YNNGNCNNR

Total cytosines in the sites above

Total cytosines in Arabidopsis genome

Generation rate

10727906

42859589

25.03%

The two-way cleavage is caused by the MspJI recognition on the symmetrically methylated sites which are mostly enriched in plant genome. We calculated the typical symmetrical CNNR sites in case of MspJI digestion, and found that these sites contain 10.72 M cytosines which account for 25.03% of the total cytosines in Arabidopsis genome. (R = A or G; Y = C or T; H = A or C or T; D = A or G or T).

Determination of methylated cytosines by MspJI-seq

We applied Illumina HiSeq2000 platform to sequence the library comprised of the gel-extracted DNA fragments that were generated from MspJI digestion in Arabidopsis genome. As a result of sequencing, 32.1 M clean reads (single-end 50 bp length) were yielded with a mapping rate of 81.65% and a unique mapping rate of 18.69% when mapping to the Arabidopsis reference genome (Additional file 3A). By matching with the information of genomic annotation, totally 13.6 M reads (67.43%) of the total 20.2 M reads with multiple mapping positions can be mapped to repetitive regions of Arabidopsis genome, which mostly explained the low unique mapping rate and indicated highly methylated repetitive sequences. Among the reads mapped to repetitive sequences, most are located in the satellites of centromeres (highly repetitive sequences) and rRNA genes (moderately repetitive sequences) (Additional file 4), which is in consistence with previous studies suggesting that DNA is heavily methylated in the Arabidopsis heterochromatic regions [10, 11]. Only a small portion of reads are distributed in genic regions, indicating a relatively lower methylation level of genes in Arabidopsis genome (Figure 1A). However, 34575 (99.35%) out of 34802 genes and 4775 (98.70%) out of 4838 pseudogene and transposons were covered by at least one read, providing sufficient coverage information for further functional studies.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-56/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Features of sequenced reads in MspJI-seq. (A) Distribution of all mapped reads on Arabidopsis genome. (B-E) Logos of insert fragments in length of 30 bp to 33 bp. Sequence characteristics were investigated by randomly extracting 1000 insert fragments in certain length from the uniquely mapped reads. Logos of 30 bp, 31 bp and 32 bp fragments (B, C and D) respectively present specific CHHG, CHG and CpG sites in the middle, and that of the 33 bp fragments (E) presents the CpG sites in a wobbling position. (F) Site categories in uniquely mapped reads with different length. The fragments in length of 26-33 bp mainly contain the symmetrical mCGNR and mCHGR sites, while fragments in other length mainly contain asymmetrical mCNNR sites. Results in Figure 1 were generated from the data of MspJI-seq replicate 1.

The actual length of insert fragments of sequencing reads is ranged from 26 bp to 39 bp after trimming off the sequencing adapters, among which 30 bp to 33 bp are mostly enriched. To determine the methylated cytosine, we notarized CNNR sites that are located in certain distance from the ends of the mapped reads based on our simulation of MspJI recognition sites. As the sequence logos of the fragments indicate, the obtained cytosines either with CpG, CHG or CHH contexts are mostly located in the middle of the insert fragments ranging from 30 bp to 33 bp (Figure 1B-E), suggesting for one mCNNR site inside the fragment. But two mCNNR sites may co-exist inside the fragments (Additional file 1E), or distribute outside the fragments (Additional file 1F), in consideration of which surrounding sequences of the fragments should be included for the determination of mCNNR sites. As a result, we summarize the counts of mCNNR sites in different categories in Figure 1F. Corresponding to the distribution of fragments based on length, the categories of YNCGNR and YCHGR sites are mostly enriched, either in uniquely mapped reads or in all mapped reads in total (Figure 1F, Additional file 5). Thus, the methylated cytosines can be efficiently identified from these sequence contexts, and the number of MspJI fragments can represent the level of methylated cytosines. We then used the uniquely mapped reads in following analysis for the interpretation of methylome of Arabidopsis.

Assessment of MspJI-seq technology

To assess the repeatability of MspJI-seq technology, we independently constructed another library for the same Arabidopsis sample and conducted high-throughput HiSeq sequencing with the same sequencing strategy. 27.9 M clean reads were yielded with a mapping rate of 70.68% and a unique mapping rate of 9.34% (Additional file 3B). Similarly, majority of the multiply mapped reads can be mapped to repetitive regions of Arabidopsis genome. As we quantify the level of methylated cytosines by the number of MspJI fragments, for which sequencing depth or the total data volume could be a factor that distorts the result. To eliminate such influence, we focused our analysis on highly methylated genomic regions. By adapting a model-based anaylsis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) algorithm [12], we identified specific genomic peak regions that were enriched with uniquely mapped MspJI fragments for two replicates of sequencing data. As a result, 11301 peaks were commonly enriched between two replicates. Pearson correlation analysis was then performed between the two sets of data on the numbers of detected mCNNR sites (Figure 2A) and methylation levels of the detected mCNNRs within the enriched peaks (Figure 2B). Pearson Correlation Coefficients (PCC) of 0.8883 and 0.6978 were obtained respectively, indicating an acceptable repeatability of this method.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-56/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Assessment of MspJI-seq technology. (A) Pearson correlation analysis of detected mCNNR number on enriched peaks of sequencing reads between two MspJI-seq replicates. (B) Pearson correlation analysis of mCNNR depth (methylation level) of enriched peaks between two MspJI-seq replicates. (C) Venn diagram indicating the overlap of YNmCGNR sites in enriched peaks detected in two MspJI-seq replicates and WGBS data. The specificity and sensitivity of MspJI method are calculated as the ratio of YNmCGNR sites commonly determined by MspJI-seq and WGBS to the total YNmCGNR sites determined by MspJI-seq or by WGBS, respectively. The two data sets of MspJI-seq replicates were counted separately for the two pairs of specificity and sensitivity. (D) The comparison of relative methylation levels on randomly chosen genomic regions (50 bp intervals) between two replicates of MspJI-seq and WGBS data.

In order to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the method, we further examined the detected YNCGNR sites among our two replicates of data and a set of WGBS methylome data of Arabidopsis downloaded from GEO (accession number GSM399600), requiring that the 32-bp fragments encompassing the symmetrically methylated CGNR sites are unique in the Arabidopsis genome [5]. We defined the methylated YNmCGNR sites as the ones covered by at least one read in our MspJI data. Similarly, methylated YNmCGNR sites in WGBS data were defined as the ones covered by at least one read that supported for methylation in this position. As a result, 0.032M WGBS-detected YNmCGNRs within the 11301 peaks were picked out and used as a reference to validate the MspJI-seq data. On average, 84.58% of the YNmCGNRs in methylation map of MspJI-seq were identified to be methylated in WGBS data, while 51.20% of the YNmCGNRs in WGBS data were detected by MspJI-seq, respectively (Figure 2C). These results indicated satisfactory specificity but less acceptable sensitivity of the MspJI-seq method in comparison with WGBS technology, suggesting more sequencing data might be required to reach a better coverage of methylated cytosines. Additionally, the methylated CNNR sites in WGBS data were determined by the binominal distribution test originally applied by Lister et al. [13] for examination of relative methylation levels, which were defined as the ratios of mCNNR number to CNNR number within genomic regions (Figure 2D, additional file 6). A general concordance of methylation patterns was observed between MspJI-seq and WGBS technologies, therefore indicating the MspJI-seq method is feasible to be applied in methylation profiling of Arabidopsis genome.

Characteristics of Arabidopsismethylome

We then combined the two sets of MspJI-seq data in order to characterize the methylation profile of Arabidopsis genome based on uniquely mapped mCNNR sites determined in the combined MspJI-seq data. In chromosome scale, we found a high enrichment of 5 mCs in repeat-rich pericentromeric regions (Figure 3A). In addition, the density of detected 5 mCs was found to correlate with the density of repetitive sequences, which possessed clearly higher methylation levels (mCNNR reads density) than genic regions, as suggested by Pablo D et al. [14, 15]. Furthermore, we investigated the DNA methylation levels across gene regions. We found that the CpG methylation is depleted at the transcription start site (TSS) and the transcription terminal site (TTS), but maintained at high levels in gene bodies. In contrast, CHG and CHH methylation remain almost unchanged at a low level in gene bodies (Figure 3B). Further examination indicated, within gene bodies, generally higher methylation level were displayed in exons than in introns in all three contexts (Figure 3C), which was in agreement with a previous study that demonstrated such methylation preference on CpG sites by shotgun genomic bisulfate sequencing [16].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-56/MediaObjects/12863_2012_Article_1129_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Characteristics of Arabidopsis methylome generated by the combined MspJI-seq data. (A) The density of 5 mCs and repetitive sequences throughout five chromosomes of Arabidopsis genome. The density of 5 mCs and MspJI-seq tags were calculated as their numbers in 100 kb intervals, and the density of repeats were calculated as repetitive sequence’s length in 100 kb intervals. (B-E) The relative methylation levels of genic regions and high-CpG regions (indicated by CGNR\CHGR\CHHR contexts). Each genic or high-CpG region were equally divided into 20 intervals and their 1 kb surrounding sequences were divided into 100 bp intervals. The figures display average methylation levels on intervals of gene bodies (B), exons and introns (C), CGIs (D) and the CGIs overlapping with gene promoters (E). (F) The normalized methylation levels of housekeeping genes and hypervariable genes. The calculation of relative methylation levels of gene sequences is just as that of intervals.

We further examined the methylation status in relation with sequence context and found that regions with higher concentrations of CpG dinucleotides are more heavily methylated either at CpG and non-CpG sites (Figure 3D, 3E), which is in agreement with the former discovery [8]. This is interestingly different from mammalian genome, in which the regions with high CpG concentration termed as CpG islands (CGI) are usually hypomethylated and associated with the majority of gene promoters, which makes the CGI methylation affect on transcription initiation [17, 18]. However, the extensive DNA methylation on high-CpG regions and its poor intersection with promoters (41.2%) in Arabidopsis might indicate much weaker function of CGI methylation in regulation of transcription in comparison with that of mammals.

Next we tested the methylation level of specific genes that were reported to be hypermathylated (housekeeping genes) and hypomethylated (hypervariable genes) in previous study [19]. We normalized the methylation levels of all genes and their promoters in our profile, and found a remarkable disparity that housekeeping genes are hypermathylated and hypervariable genes are hypomethylated on gene bodies, despite the methylation levels of their promoters are both similar to the average level (Figure 3F).

In summary, the characterization of either global methylation pattern or methylation level of specific genes of Arabidopsis by MspJI-seq is in consistence with previous discoveries [8, 9, 19], indicating a general feasibility of the new method in detecting genome-scale methylation profiles.

Discussion

In present study, we applied MspJI-seq for genome-wide profiling of 5 mCs. This method relies on the MspJI enzyme that can specifically recognize single mCNNR sites in vivo. Naturally, it enables a precise detection of 5-mC and quantification of methylation level for a specific CNNR site, providing better resolution in comparison with affinity-based methods, such as methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-sequencing) and methyl-binding protein sequencing (MBD-seq).

To start with, we optimized the protocol of MspJI digestion on plant genome and recovered a notarized length range (28-35 bp) of fragments based on our simulation of MspJI digestion on Arabidopsis genome. By sequencing the recovered fragments, methylcytosines in CNNR context can thus be identified and quantified from the sequencing reads. Data from two independent MspJI-seq experiments were analyzed to estimate the repeatability of the method as well as its specificity and sensitivity in comparison with WGBS data. As a result, we obtained acceptable repeatability and specificity of MspJI-seq in detecting methylated CNNR sites. However, the average technical sensitivity is a bit low (51.20%). Low-frequency methylated CNNR sites in a cell population might be neglected due to insufficiency of sequencing depth, wastage of digested fragments in the process of size-selecting and purification or even the competing cleavage on mCNNRs that are adjacently existed in genomic regions. Nevertheless, MspJI-seq can still be used to identify most of the symmetrical mCNNRs, which are typically enriched in plant genomes.

By defining the methylation levels of genomic regions as the mCNNR density, we portrayed the methylation pattern of different genomic regions. We found that CpG and non-CpG context are differently methylated in gene bodies, and exons display higher methylation levels than introns in both contexts. Our results are consistent with previously published Arabidopsis methylome in that high-CpG regions are heavily methylated either at CpG and non-CpG sites in Arabidopsis genome [8, 9]. Thus it’s feasible to examine the representative methylation profile by using the MspJI-seq method with a reduced data volume. Because of the competing cleavage induced by the nearby mCNNR sites (Additional file 1B, 1D), it will be difficult to attribute methylation levels for high-density 5 mCs within CNNR sites. In that case, it’s especially suitable for determining methylation levels in specific genomic intervals. Furthermore, this MspJI-seq method can be further improved. For instance, a bigger range of digestion products can be recovered in sequencing library construction to ensure the detection of a larger scope of asymmetrically methylated cytosines. In addition, as most of the reads were multiply mapped to repetitive sequences and can’t be used to infer methylation status precisely, removing repetitive sequences prior to sequencing should be considered. One possible approach is to employ subtracting hybridized biotin-labeled repetitive-sequence DNA complex with phenol and chloroform after incubation of hybridized products with avidin, thus producing unique products that are formed after such repetitive sequences have been removed from the DNA [20].

Conclusions

This work provides an example for combining methylation-depedent enzyme MspJI with high-throughput sequencing in detection of DNA methylation. We emphasize that such digestion-based method is equipped with low cost and high efficiency on representatively determining DNA methylation profiles in all CpG, CHG and CHH contexts, thus the method can be further used in methylome investigating for other species. With proper improvement, the other members of MspJI family can also be introduced in methylation study. Furthermore, it is hoped that MspJI-seq can be used to distinguish hydroxymethylcytosines from methylcytosines, as glycosylation treatment on hydroxymethylated cytosines will hamper the recognition and digestion by MspJI.

Methods

Sample preparation

Germinated Arabidopsis thaliana seeds (genotype: wild-type, ecotype: Columbia) were grown in 1/4 MS culture medium at 23°C under a 10-hour light/14-hour dark cycle for 13 days. Then seedlings were transplanted to potting soil and grew at 28°C for 45 days. Genomic DNA was extracted from the 45-day Arabidopsis leaves using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method followed byphenol: chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. DNA quality was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The genomic DNA was prepared for construction of two replicates of MspJI-seq libraries.

Library construction and sequencing

1.5 μg genomic DNA was digested at 37°C for 16 h by 12U MspJI enzyme (NEB) in the presence of 0.8 μM double-stranded DNA activator (Invitrogen) in a 30 μl volume. The digestion system was optimized for the Arabidopsis genome from the original NEB protocol. By running the digested DNA in a 15% native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), a narrow-band containing all the visible fragments around 28-35 bp was excised in reference of 10 bp DNA ladder (NEB). DNA was isolated by Crush and Soak Method [21] and purified by ethanol precipitation. Recovered DNA was used to construct sequencing library according to the Illumina Pair-End protocol including procedures of DNA end-repair, ‘A’ base addition, adapters ligation and PCR amplification. Phenol: chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation were used to purify the products of each process. PCR reaction was fulfilled by JumpStart™ Taq DNA Polymerase (Sigma) for 6 cycles, and its products at length of 148-155 bp were recovered from a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis in reference of 50 bp DNA ladder (NEB), and purified according to QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen). The obtained library was analyzed by Bioanalyzer analysis system (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) before sequencing with Illumina HiSeq2000.

Data processing and analysis

We developed a pipeline using Perl for data processing and analysis including simulation of MspJI enzymatic digestion, reads trimming and filtering, reads alignment, sites recognition and mCNNR collection. The scripts can be found online at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mspjiseqpipelin/. Briefly, raw sequencing data was processed by the Illumina base-calling pipeline. Low-quality reads that contained more than 30% ‘N’s or over 10% of the sequence with low quality value (quality value <20) per read were omitted from data analysis. Then the clean reads trimmed off sequencing adapters were aligned to the Arabidopsis reference TAIR9 (The Arabidopsis Information Resource, http://ftp.arabidopsis.org/home/tair/Genes/TAIR9_genome_release/) using Soap2.20 (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/index.html) [22] with default parameters. In the annotation of mapped reads (Figure 1A, Additional file 4), we randomly picked up one mapping position for multiply mapped read and repeated this sampling for 1000 times, the mean value of the repeats were adopted as final results for this multiply mapped read. The regular matching seeking algorithm in perl was used to identify the CNNR sites within the mapped reads, and the cytosines in notarized CNNR sites obtained by MspJI-seq were determined as the methylated cytosines. The counts of fragments with CNNR sites (the sequencing depths) were defined as the absolute methylation level of the cytosine within the CNNR site and the read density of CNNR sites in a certain genomic region were defined as the relative methylation level of this region. Protein-coding genes, pseudogenes and tansposons were defined from the TAIR9 annotations, genomic repeat regions were mapped by RepeatMasker (version open-3.2.8), and high-CpG regions were detected by Model-based CpG Islands (http://rafalab.jhsph.edu/CGI/) with a posterior probability threshold of 0.99.

Sequence logos of fragments and sites were constructed using weblogo software (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/), which are graphical representations with the height of symbols within the stack indicating the relative frequency of each nucleic acid at that position. Raw and processed data of two MspJI-seq replicates were uploaded to GEO with the accession number GSE46428.

Public data used

The WGBS data from aerial tissues of wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (Ecotype Columbia) was downloaded from GEO (accession number GSM399600).

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues for helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank NEB for sequencing in our early testing. This work is supported by BGI-shenzhen.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Science & Technology Department, BGI-Shenzhen
(2)
College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University
(3)
School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

References

  1. Chan SW, Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE: Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6: 351-360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hajkova P, El-Maarri O, Engemann S, Oswald J, Olek A, Walter J: DNA-methylation analysis by the bisulfite-assisted genomic sequencing method. Methods Mol Biol. 2002, 200: 143-154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Momparler RL, Bovenzi V: DNA methylation and cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2000, 183: 145-154. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200005)183:2<145::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ramsahoye BH, Biniszkiewicz D, Lyko F, Clark V, Bird AP, Jaenisch R: Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 5237-5242. 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5237.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Krueger F, Andrews SR: Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 1571-1572. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zheng Y, Cohen-Karni D, Xu D, Chin HG, Wilson G, Pradhan S, Roberts RJ: A unique family of Mrr-like modification-dependent restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: 5527-5534. 10.1093/nar/gkq327.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen-Karni D, Xu D, Apone L, Fomenkov A, Sun Z, Davis PJ, Kinney SR, Yamada-Mabuchi M, Xu SY, Davis T, et al: The MspJI family of modification-dependent restriction endonucleases for epigenetic studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 11040-11045. 10.1073/pnas.1018448108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X, Chen Z, Merriman B, Haudenschild CD, Pradhan S, Nelson SF, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE: Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature. 2008, 452: 215-219. 10.1038/nature06745.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lister R, O'Malley RC, Tonti-Filippini J, Gregory BD, Berry CC, Millar AH, Ecker JR: Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2008, 133: 523-536. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lippman Z, Gendrel AV, Black M, Vaughn MW, Dedhia N, McCombie WR, Lavine K, Mittal V, May B, Kasschau KD, et al: Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature. 2004, 430: 471-476. 10.1038/nature02651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang X, Yazaki J, Sundaresan A, Cokus S, Chan SW, Chen H, Henderson IR, Shinn P, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE, et al: Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in arabidopsis. Cell. 2006, 126: 1189-1201. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al: Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008, 9: 2008-2009.Google Scholar
  13. Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, Hawkins RD, Hon G, Tonti-Filippini J, Nery JR, Lee L, Ye Z, Ngo QM, et al: Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009, 462: 315-322. 10.1038/nature08514.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rabinowicz PD, Citek R, Budiman MA, Nunberg A, Bedell JA, Lakey N, O'Shaughnessy AL, Nascimento LU, McCombie WR, Martienssen RA: Differential methylation of genes and repeats in land plants. Genome Res. 2005, 15: 1431-1440. 10.1101/gr.4100405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rabinowicz PD, Palmer LE, May BP, Hemann MT, Lowe SW, McCombie WR, Martienssen RA: Genes and transposons are differentially methylated in plants, but not in mammals. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 2658-2664. 10.1101/gr.1784803.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, Chen PY, Bostick M, Goll MG, Hetzel J, Jain J, Strauss SH, Halpern ME, et al: Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 8689-8694. 10.1073/pnas.1002720107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deaton AM, Bird A: CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 2011, 25: 1010-1022. 10.1101/gad.2037511.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Illingworth RS, Bird AP: CpG islands–'a rough guide'. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583: 1713-1720. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.04.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aceituno FF, Moseyko N, Rhee SY, Gutierrez RA: The rules of gene expression in plants: organ identity and gene body methylation are key factors for regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 1471-2164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lucas JN, Wu X, Guo E, Chi LE, Chen Z: An efficient chemical method to generate repetitive sequences depleted DNA probes. Am J Med Genet A. 2006, 140: 2115-2120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sambrook J: Gel Electrophoresis of DNA and Pulsed-Field Agarose. Molecular cloning. Volume 2. 2001, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3Google Scholar
  22. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, Wang J: SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 1966-1967. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.