Volume 4 Supplement 1

Genetic Analysis Workshop 13: Analysis of Longitudinal Family Data for Complex Diseases and Related Risk Factors

Open Access

A genome-wide scan using tree-based association analysis for candidate loci related to fasting plasma glucose levels

  • Chien-Hsiun Chen1,
  • Chee Jen Chang2, 4,
  • Wei-Shiung Yang3, 4,
  • Chun-Liang Chen1 and
  • Cathy SJ Fann1Email author
BMC Genetics20034(Suppl 1):S65

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S65

Published: 31 December 2003

Abstract

Background

In the analysis of complex traits such as fasting plasma glucose levels, researchers often adjust the trait for some important covariates before assessing gene susceptibility, and may at times encounter confounding among the covariates and the susceptible genes. Previously, the tree-based method has been employed to accommodate the heterogeneity in complex traits. In this study, we performed a genome-wide screen on fasting glucose levels in the offspring generation of the Framingham Heart Study provided by the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13. We defined one quantitative trait and converted it to a dichotomous trait based on a predetermined cut-off value, and performed association analyses using regression and classification trees for the two traits, respectively. A marker was interpreted as positive if at least one of its alleles exhibited association in both analyses. Our purpose was to identify candidate genes susceptible to fasting glucose levels in the presence of other covariates. The covariates entered in the analysis including sex, body mass index, and lipids (total plasma cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) of the subjects, and those of their parents.

Results

Four out of seven positive regions in chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 11, 16, 18, and 19 from our analyses harbored or were very close to previously reported diabetes related genes or potential candidate genes.

Conclusion

This screen method that employed tree-based association showed promise for identifying candidate loci in the presence of covariates in genome scans for complex traits.

Background

Problem 1 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 (GAW13) provided the data from the Framingham Heart Study. We focused on the offspring cohort due to the missing rate of the data in the parental cohort.

Because the history of medical intervention, including the adjustment of lifestyle and the use of anti-diabetic medications were not available, we chose the highest fasting plasma glucose levels across the course of follow-up as the targeted quantitative trait to indicate the potential risk for abnormal glucose disposal. As suggested by the American Diabetes Association, the impaired fasting glucose (IFG, fasting plasma glucose between 110 and 125 mg/dl) appears as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1]. We further used the lower limit of IFG (≥110 mg/dl) as the cut-off to transform this quantitative trait into a dichotomy. In this way, we included the subjects in the group with one or more incidences of higher fasting plasma glucose. We then performed association analyses using regression and classification trees for the two traits, respectively. A marker was considered positive if at least one of its alleles showed association in both analyses.

Our purpose was to identify candidate genes related to the fasting glucose levels in the presence of covariates. We found a few interesting markers that are closely linked with some potential candidate genes biologically relevant to glucose metabolism.

Method

Data processing

For the phenotype measurements, the corresponding covariates were created using their cross-sectional means. The covariates entered in the analysis included sex, body mass index, and lipids (total plasma cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) for each subjects. To control for potential familial correlations, the cross-sectional means of the maternal and paternal phenotype measurements were also included as covariates.

For the genotypic data, an allele was chosen to enter the analyses if its allele frequency is at least 10%. Alleles with frequencies less than 10% but from the same marker are categorized as an incognito allele. The allelic covariates were created using the technique proposed by Zhang and Bonney [2].

Association analysis using classification trees

The classification tree (CT) and regression tree (RT) methods are both built on the recursive partition technique; they can be used to partition a study population into homogeneous disjointed subgroups. The optimal tree is created by both growing and pruning procedures. The maximal tree is built by splitting each node into two child nodes until the purity of the terminal node is achieved. In splitting, the best choice of the child node is derived while the minimum of the entropy impurity function is reached. In pruning, it is processed for each binary class j in the subtree τ until the unconditional misclassification rate https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-4-S1-S65/MediaObjects/12863_2003_Article_131_IEq1_HTML.gif is attained, where c(j|i) is the cost that a class j is classified as a class i and IP is the entropy impurity function. In general, choice of the cost depends on the severity of the misclassification. In this study, equal cost was chosen for both misclassifications because it frequently gives most satisfactory analyses [3], i.e., c(1|0) = c(0|1). The optimal tree in RT is similar to that in CT with a different impurity function https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-4-S1-S65/MediaObjects/12863_2003_Article_131_IEq2_HTML.gif , i.e., the within-node variance in the tree τ. More details of CT, RT, and corresponding splitting criteria are described elsewhere [35].

Tree-based association analysis was implemented by using genotype measurements such as allelic covariates and related phenotype measurements to construct binary trees. An allele shows association with the trait if its corresponding covariate is included in the optimal tree.

To illustrate the tree construction, a portion of an optimal tree created by CT is presented in Figure 1. First, a total of 1667 subjects (the offspring generation) were divided into two groups according to whether averaged BMI was less than 26.35 or not (node 1 to nodes 2 and 8). Those with averaged BMI higher than 26.35 were further subdivided according to their HBP status (node 8 to nodes 9 and 15). Those 314 subjects in node 9 were further divided into node 10 (or 14) if their averaged maternal triglyceride was lower (or higher) than 135.5 mg/dl. Finally, if the genotype was absent of allele 266 in D16S2620 then the subject was likely to have a fasting glucose levels lower than 110 mg/dl. In summary, allele 266 in D16S2620 was associated with fasting glucose levels for those with higher BMI (>26.35), no HBP, and lower maternal triglyceride levels (<135.5 mg/dl).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-4-S1-S65/MediaObjects/12863_2003_Article_131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

A proportion of an optimal tree from classification tree Decision node criteria: 1. BMI: average BMI across-section 2. HBP: ever hypertension in all sections 3. MTG: average maternal triglycerides 4. Allele 266 of D16S2620 Definition of classes: Class 0, glucose levels < 110 mg/dl in all section; Class 1, at least one observed fasting glucose levels >110 mg/dl.

Genome-wide screen

In this study, we conducted a genome-wide screen to identify the candidate gene in the presence of a set of specified covariates. We performed RT- and CT-based association analyses on the quantitative and dichotomy traits, respectively. A marker was interpreted as positive if at least one of its alleles showed association in both association analyses. The allelic covariates from the same chromosome were entered in the analyses simultaneously. The genome-wide screen consisted of 22 such processes for the autosomes. The computer programs QUEST [6] and RT [7] were used to construct the binary trees for the CT and RT analyses.

Web-searching for candidate genes

The map position was defined using Ensemble Genome Server at Sanger Institute http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/. For candidate gene search, we used Online Medelian Inheritance in Man at National Center for Biotechnology Information http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=OMIM or euGene http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu:8089/man/.

Results

Table 1 shows these seven candidate regions, consisting of nine positive markers in both analyses, were on chromosomes 1p, 2p, 6q, 11p, 16q, 18p, and 19q. Among these seven regions, four regions, covering the four markers, D1S1665, D6S474, D11S1981, and D19S254, were closely linked to the genes previously reported to be relevant to glucose metabolism or diabetes mellitus (details listed in Table 1).
Table 1

Positive markers found in the analyses using classification and regression trees

Chr

Marker

Marker Alias

Position

Previous Reports

1

D1S1665

GATA61A06

1p31.1

Amylase, salivary, Pancreatic (1p21), facilitated glucose transporter (1p31-35), agiopoietin-like 3 (1p31)

2

D2S2952

GATA116B01

2p25.1

Glucokinase regulatory protein (2p23), Alstrom syndrome (2p13), serum levels of leptin (2p21), hexokinase 2 (2p12), eukaryote translation initiation factor 2-α kinase 3 (Wolcott-Rallison syndrome, 2p21)

6

D6S474

GATA31

6q21

IDDM 1 (6q21) IDDM5 (6q24-27), IDDM8 (6q25-27), IDDM15, transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (6q24), pleomorphic adenoma gene-like 1 (6q24-26), phosphodiesterase 1 (6q22-23)

11

D11S1981

GATA48E02

11p15.1

HRAS (11p14.1), INS (11p14.1), MODY1 (11p15.5), phosphodiesterase 3B (11p15), SUR1 (11p15.1), Kir6.2 (11p15.1)

16

D16S3396

ATA55A11

16q12.1

RRAD (16q22)

 

D16S3253

GATA22F09

16q12.2

 
 

D16S2620

GATA67G11

  

18

D18S542

GATA11A06

18p11.21

 

19

D19S254

Mfd238

19q13.43

Glycogen synthase 1 (muscle)(19q13.3), ApoCIII (19q13.2), Dystrophia Myotonica 1 (19q13.2-13.3), AKT2 (19q13.1-13.2), TGFβ1 (19q13.1), Glycogen synthase kinase 3A (19q13.1-13.2)

Discussions and Conclusions

In this study, the intent of our screen method was to identify candidate markers rather than to pinpoint susceptibility alleles, although it can be applied to detect the allelic or non-allelic heterogeneity. The cut-off value used in CT in this analysis was chosen for a biological reason. However, the analysis was sensitive to the choice of cut-offs when the subjects were largely clustered around the cut-off point (>110 mg/dl). Only three regions on 1p, 16q, and 18p were consistently positive at neighboring cut-offs from 100 to 120.

Although covariates such as BMI and HBP, which are associated with fasting glucose level, were included in our analyses, the cut-off of these covariates in our final 22 optimal trees were not the same. Further studies are needed to inspect the impact of different cut-off and associated alleles.

From a different point of view, our method used the RT analysis on the quantitative trait to validate the results from CT such that the positive markers showed association in both analyses. Notably, four out of the seven candidate regions harbored previously reported genes that are related to glucose metabolism or diabetes mellitus. In conclusion, our screen method shows promise for searching candidate loci in genome scans for complex traits.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC 91-3112-B-001-006-M51) and National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH-91A15).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica
(2)
Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital
(4)
The Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University

References

  1. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997, 20: 1183-1197.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Z, Bonney GE: Use of classification trees for association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2000, 19: 323-332. 10.1002/1098-2272(200012)19:4<323::AID-GEPI4>3.0.CO;2-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ: Classification and Regression Trees. New York, Chapman and Hall. 1989Google Scholar
  4. Chang CJ, Fann CSJ: Using data mining to address heterogeneity in the Southampton data. Genet Epidemiol. 2001, 21: S180-S185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fann CSJ, Shugart YY, Lachman H, Collins A, Chang CJ: The impact of redefining affection status for alcoholism on affected-sib-pair analysis. Genet Epidemiol. 1999, 17: S151-S156. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)17:2<151::AID-GEPI5>3.3.CO;2-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Mathematics, National Chung Cheng University,Taiwan: Quest User Manual. Version 1.8.8. Taiwan. 2000Google Scholar
  7. Torgo L: RT 4.1 User's Manual. University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. 2001Google Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.