Open Access

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions of canine dopamine- and serotonin-related genes

BMC Genetics20089:10

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-10

Received: 18 June 2007

Accepted: 28 January 2008

Published: 28 January 2008

Abstract

Background

Polymorphism in genes of regulating enzymes, transporters and receptors of the neurotransmitters of the central nervous system have been associated with altered behaviour, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) represent the most frequent type of genetic variation. The serotonin and dopamine signalling systems have a central influence on different behavioural phenotypes, both of invertebrates and vertebrates, and this study was undertaken in order to explore genetic variation that may be associated with variation in behaviour.

Results

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in canine genes related to behaviour were identified by individually sequencing eight dogs (Canis familiaris) of different breeds. Eighteen genes from the dopamine and the serotonin systems were screened, revealing 34 SNPs distributed in 14 of the 18 selected genes. A total of 24,895 bp coding sequence was sequenced yielding an average frequency of one SNP per 732 bp (1/732). A total of 11 non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs), which may be involved in alteration of protein function, were detected. Of these 11 nsSNPs, six resulted in a substitution of amino acid residue with concomitant change in structural parameters.

Conclusion

We have identified a number of coding SNPs in behaviour-related genes, several of which change the amino acids of the proteins. Some of the canine SNPs exist in codons that are evolutionary conserved between five compared species, and predictions indicate that they may have a functional effect on the protein. The reported coding SNP frequency of the studied genes falls within the range of SNP frequencies reported earlier in the dog and other mammalian species. Novel SNPs are presented and the results show a significant genetic variation in expressed sequences in this group of genes. The results can contribute to an improved understanding of the genetics of behaviour.

Background

Neurotransmitters of the central nervous system (CNS) indisputably are important for modulation of the dispersed behaviour seen in both man and animals. Polymorphism in genes of regulating enzymes, transporters and receptors have been associated with altered behaviour [13]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) represent the most frequent type of genetic variation in human populations. Non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) comprise a group of SNPs that, together with SNPs in regulatory regions, are believed to have the highest impact on phenotype [4].

The genetic basis of behaviour has been explored within a wide range of genes representing neurotransmitters and signalling molecules, and the vast majority of work has been performed on monoamine systems. The serotonin and dopamine signalling systems are central to different behavioural phenotypes, both of invertebrates and vertebrates [59]. Marino et al. [10] reported that defects in the noradrenergic system have been implicated in many mood, cognitive and neurological disorders that manifest abnormal social behaviour, and demonstrate that dopamine β-hydroxylase knock-out (Dbh-/-) mice are deficient in social discrimination and lack isolation-induced aggression. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B play an important role in regulating levels of biogenic amines. Whereas MAOA preferentially oxidises the biogenic amines serotonin, norepinephrine and epinephrine, MAOB preferentially oxidises phenylethylamine and benzylamine. Dopamine, tyramine and tryptamine are common substrates for both forms [11]. MAO A/B double knock-out mice showed increased brain levels of several biogenic amines, and chase/escape and anxiety-like behaviour, suggesting that alterations of monoamine levels are implicated in a unique biochemical and behavioural phenotype [12]. Polymorphism within receptor genes of dopamine and serotonin are associated with a variety of human psychiatric disorders [1316], and knockout models of 5HTR1B produce a deviant mice behaviour [17].

The knowledge of genes associated to behavioural traits is increasing. Characterisations of these genes and identification of closely linked SNPs and microsatellites make it possible to study the segregation of behaviour-associated haplotypes and to learn more about the genetic contribution to canine behaviour. SNPs as abundant polymorphisms scattered over the genomes are important tools for detailed mapping [18]. Beside their value as markers, some of these variations represent polymorphisms with functional effects. Descriptions of genetic variation in expressed sequences and changes in protein sequence may contribute to reveal the causes of differences in behavioural phenotypes.

The large number of canine breeds exhibits an extreme between-breed variation in traits like size, colour, conformation and behaviour. For many of these breeds, behavioural characteristics represent an important part of the breed definition and description. Certain behavioural phenotypes are associated with specific breeds as a result of long-term, systematic selection and limited genetic variation. In a behavioural context, dog breeds are evidence for the considerable impact of genetics on behavioural traits. They are therefore valuable models for genetic studies aimed at revealing basic biological knowledge of genetic regulation of behavioural traits. This can be efficiently performed through crossbreeding and backcrosses of these isolates with strong between-breed contrasts in specific behaviours.

Some recent publications characterise polymorphisms in the canine dopamine and serotonin gene families [1923], but the number of reported SNPs in coding sequence of behaviour-related genes from dogs is still low. A better knowledge of genetic variation in these genes will be important for an improved understanding of the genetic influence on behaviour in both animals and humans. This study presents novel SNPs in coding sequences of canine serotonin- and dopamine-related genes.

Results

Sequencing a total number of 24,895 bp coding DNA in each of eight dogs of different breeds revealed a total of 34 SNPs, 30 of them not earlier reported, distributed in 14 of the 18 selected genes (Table 1). SNPs were identified in five genes in the dopamine pathway, in one gene related to synthesis of norepinephrine and in nine genes in the serotonin pathway (Table 2).
Table 1

List of genes included in the study, with sequence screened and SNP frequency

Gene

Gene symbol

Gene product category/function*

Bp screened

SNP/bp

Dopamine related genes

Tyrosine hydroxylase

TH

Presynaptic form. of DOPA

1488

1/1488

Dopamine transporter

SLC6A3

Synaptic clearance of Dopamine

1881

1/470

Dopamine receptor D1

DRD1

G protein-coupled receptor

1341

1/335

Dopamine receptor D2

DRD2

G protein-coupled receptor

1332

1/666

Dopamine receptor D3

DRD3

G protein-coupled receptor

1344

1/336

Norepinephrine related gene

Dopamine beta hydroxylase

DBH

Presynaptic form. of norepinephrine

1839

1/306

Serotonin related genes

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1A

HTR1A

G protein-coupled receptor

1272

1/1272

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1B

HTR1B

G protein-coupled receptor

1170

1/585

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1D

HTR1D

G protein-coupled receptor

1134

1/283

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1E

HTR1E

G protein-coupled receptor

1098

1/1098

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1F

HTR1F

G protein-coupled receptor

1101

1/1101

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A

HTR2A

G protein-coupled receptor

1414

0

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B

HTR2B

G protein-coupled receptor

1305

1/652

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C

HTR2C

G protein-coupled receptor

1377

1/1377

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3A

HTR3A

Ligand-gated ion channel

1452

1/1452

5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4

HTR4

G protein-coupled receptor

1167

0

Serotonin transporter

SLC6A4

Synaptic clearance of Serotonin

1845

0

Tryptophan hydroxylase 1

TPH1

Presynaptic form. of hydroxytryptophan (5HT)

1335

0

Sum of bp screened

  

24895

 

No. of SNPs detected

  

34

 

Frequency of SNPs (snp/bp)

  

1/732

 

   Synonym (n = 23)

  

1/1082

 

   Non-synonym (n = 11)

  

1/2263

 

* As defined at [35]

Table 2

SNPs according to position, function, predicted changes in amino acid and novelty.

Gene

CFA*

Region

Allel

Function

Codon position

Protein residue

Aa position

Novelty of SNP§

Reference sequence||

TH

18

EX 13

C/T

syn

3

Asp [D]

482

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001002966.1]

SLC6A3

34

EX 9

A/G

syn

3

Gly [G]

418

Novel

[GenBank: XM_846543.1]

  

EX 10

C/T

syn

3

Asp [D]

468

Publ. – rs23877306

[GenBank: XM_846543.1]

  

EX 10

A/G

syn

3

Ala [A]

471

Novel

[GenBank: XM_846543.1]

  

EX 11

C/T

syn

3

Asp [D]

498

Novel

[GenBank: XM_846543.1]

DRD1

4

EX 1

A/G

syn

3

Ala [A]

84

Novel

[GenBank: XM_546227.2]

  

EX 1

C/T

syn

3

Gly [G]

88

Novel

[GenBank: XM_546227.2]

  

EX 1

C/T

syn

3

Val [V]

236

Novel

[GenBank: XM_546227.2]

  

EX 1

C/T

ns

2

Thr [T]/Met [M]

354

Novel

[GenBank: XM_546227.2]

DRD2

5

EX 2

C/T

syn

3

Asn [N]

23

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001003110.1]

  

EX 2

C/T

syn

3

Ala [A]

77

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001003110.1]

DRD3

33

EX 4

C/T

syn

3

Cys [C]

231

Novel

[GenBank: XM_545106.2]

  

EX 6

A/G

ns

2

Gln [Q]/Arg [R]

294

Novel

[GenBank: XM_545106.2]

  

EX 6

C/T

ns

1

Leu [L]/Phe [F]

341

Novel

[GenBank: XM_545106.2]

  

EX 7

C/T

syn

3

Cys [C]

402

Novel

[GenBank: XM_545106.2]

DBH

9

EX 1

A/G

syn

3

Thr [T]

17

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001005263.1]

  

EX 2

A/G

syn

3

Gln [Q]

121

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001005263.1]

  

EX 3

C/T

syn

3

Tyr [Y]

163

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001005263.1]

  

EX 4

A/C

ns

3

Lys [K]/Asn [N]

263

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001005263.1]

  

EX 4

C/T

syn

3

Gly [G]

297

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001005263.1]

  

EX 12

A/G

syn

3

Gly [G]

622

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001005263.1]

HTR1A

2

EX1

A/C

ns

1

Lys [K]/Gln [Q]

270

Publ. – rs22855024

[GenBank: XM_544358.1]

HTR1B

12

EX 1

A/C

ns

1

Ile [I]/Leu [L]

53

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001006948.1]

  

EX 1

A/G

syn

3

Pro [P]

82

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001006948.1]

HTR1D

2

EX 1

C/T

ns

2

Ala [A]/Val [V]

97

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001003280.1]

  

EX 1

C/T

syn

3

Tyr [Y]

221

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001003280.1]

  

EX 1

A/G

ns

2

Glu [E]/Gly [G]

263

Publ. – rs22791523

[GenBank: NM_001003280.1]

  

EX 1

C/T

syn

3

His [H]

372

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001003280.1]

HTR1E

12

EX 1

C/T

syn

1

Leu [L]

39

Novel

[GenBank: XM_539028.1]

HTR1F

31

EX 1

C/T

syn

3

Arg [R]

162

Publ. – rs9250875

[Ensembl: ENSCAFT00000012417]

HTR2B

25

EX 1

C/T

ns

2

Thr [T]/Ile [I]

88

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001024633.1]

  

EX 3

C/T

ns

2

Ala [A]/Val [V]

431

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001024633.1]

HTR2C

X

EX 6

A/G

syn

3

Pro [P]

280

Novel

[GenBank: NM_001006648.1]

HTR3A

5

EX 2

C/T

ns

2

Thr [T]/Met [M]

64

Novel

[GenBank: XM_546517.2]

* Chromosome number, Canis familiaris.

† Synonymous SNP (syn) and non-synonymous SNP (ns)

‡ Listed ambiguity is decided by the respective allel in column 4.

§ Novelty of SNPs explored by blasting the dbSNP (Dog_9615) at [36]. Reference no. given for corresponding published SNP.

|| Canine sequence/predicted sequence, for defining SNPs position in protein. Given as GenBank or Ensemble accession number.

The 34 SNPs comprised 23 synonymous and 11 non-synonymous, with the predicted changes in amino acids as described in Table 2 (for flanking nucleotide sequences see Additional file 1). Of the 11 nsSNPs, three held the first position, seven held the second position and one held the third position of the codon. Categorisation of the SNPs according to nucleotide substitution gave 31(91%) transitions and 3 (9%) transversions, the transversions all being nsSNPs. Six of the 11 nsSNPs resulted in a substitution of amino acid residue with a concomitant shift of class dependent on R group, and change in structural parameters (Table 3). Looking at conservation of amino acids in the location of detected nsSNPs we found that across five mammalian species (Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes, Canis familiaris, Mus musculus and Rattus norvegius, at HomoloGene, [24]) four of the sites were reported invariant and seven reported variable (Table 3). Part of the alignment of the protein products from these five species, containing the canine nsSNPs (ClustalW, [25]) are shown in Figure 1.
Table 3

Shift of residues with change of class according to R groups, conservation across species and PolyPhen predictions.

Gene

Protein residue*

Aa position

Change in class according to R group

Residue conservation across 5 species

PolyPhen prediction§

DRD1

Thr [T]/Met [M]

354

No change

Invariant

Possibly damaging

DRD3

Gln [Q]/Arg [R]

294

Polar, uncharged/positively charged

Variable

Benign

 

Leu [L]/Phe [F]

341

Nonpolar, aliphatic/aromatic

Invariant

Benign

DBH

Lys [K]/Asn [N]

263

Positively charged/polar, uncharged

Variable

Benign

HTR1A

Lys [K]/Gln [Q]

270

Positively charged/polar, uncharged

Variable

Benign

HTR1B

Ile [I]/Leu [L]

53

No change

Variable

Benign

HTR1D

Ala [A]/Val [V]

97

No change

Invariant

Benign

 

Glu [E]/Gly [G]

263

Negatively charged/Nonpolar, aliphatic

Variable

Benign

HTR2B

Thr [T]/Ile [I]

88

Polar, uncharged/nonpolar, aliphatic

Invariant

Probably damaging

 

Ala [A]/Val [V]

431

No change

Variable

Predicted to be unknown

HTR3A

Thr [T]/Met [M]

64

No change

Variable

Possibly damaging

* Changes according to Table 2, shift in residues as result of different alleles of SNPs.

† Changes according to shift of residues in column 2, respectively. Classes according to R groups as described by [37].

‡ Residue variation across five mammalian species.

§ Prediction of a possible damaging effect of the amino acid substitutions caused by the nsSNPs, performed with PolyPhen [4].

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-9-10/MediaObjects/12863_2007_Article_576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Alignment showing amino acid variation across five species in location of nsSNPs. The alignment show selected parts of the protein sequence containing the 11 detected nsSNPs in the dog, marked as bold and underlined residues. Only four species are aligned for the DRD1 gene since there was no homologous gene available for the Chimpanzee (HomoloGene, [24]).

The potential functional effects of the 11 identified substitutions caused by the nsSNPs were explored using the software PolyPhen [4], designed to predict functional effects of amino acid substitutions (in humans). The predictions are classified as unknown, benign, possibly damaging and probably damaging. The results showed that the effect of the amino acid substitution was predicted to change the function in three of the residues (possibly/probably damaging) and was classified as benign in seven of the substitutions. In one of the substitutions the effect was unknown (Table 3).

Discussion

Being the most frequent variation of DNA, SNPs represent important causes of transcript variation. The identification and closer study of these polymorphisms are important for the assignment of the genetic contribution to different phenotypes. This study describes SNPs in genes from neurotransmitter systems that are reported to be related to different behavioural phenotypes.

SNP frequencies show a considerable variation between species [18, 2628], and Lindblad-Toh et al. [29] presents in dog a between-breed SNP frequency of ~1/900 bp based on shotgun sequence data from each of nine diverse breeds compared to the boxer genome. The SNP frequency detected in our study (1/732, see Table 1), where a higher number of chromosomes are compared, falls within this range. We are not aware of prior studies reporting SNP frequency of coding sequences from a number of canine genes.

In our study we observed a ~2.5 times higher number of SNPs in dopamine-related genes compared to serotonin-related genes. In the group of dopamine-related genes we observed 15 SNPs/7,386 bp sequenced (1/492), while 12 SNPs/14,218 bp (1/1184) were observed in the group of serotonin-related genes (p < 0.05). This may indicate a greater conservation or a greater similarity in the gene structure of the serotonin-related genes compared to the group of dopamine-related genes. The two gene sets represent genes with similar function related to the respective neurotransmitters. The G-coupled receptors are, however, more numerously represented among the serotonin related genes (Table 1). One gene, HTR3A is a ligand-gated ion channel and is kept out of the analysis.

Since the completion of the sequence for several genomes, there has been an increased focus on functional polymorphism. Databases containing huge numbers of SNPs are now available for the research community. Besides outlining genome architecture with gene location and description of polymorphisms, one of the major challenges is to infer the functional implications of these variations. It has been estimated that ~20% of common human nsSNPs damage the protein [30]. A large database for identification of human nsSNPs with potential impact on disease (PolyDoms, [31]) uses two sequence homology-based tools, SIFT [32] and PolyPhen [4], to predict the potential impact of nsSNP on protein function. Among the structural parameters analysed in PolyPhen for assessing a possible damaging effect of amino acid substitutions are properties in relation to changes of hydrophobicity and electrostatic charge, as well as protein solubility and compatibility of amino acid substitutions in homologous proteins. The changes of R-group classes seen in six of the substitutions in our study (Table 3) represent a change in such structural parameters. When inferring about the effect of the predicted amino acid substitutions it can be useful to combine data describing biochemical properties of residues, with knowledge of the conservation across species. Table 3 shows that four residues are evolutionary conserved between the five compared species. Of these, two also experience a change in class of R-group. Presumably one would expect these two substitutions to be the ones most likely to cause functional changes in the protein

Conclusion

We have identified a number of coding SNPs in behaviour-related genes, several of which change the amino acids of the proteins. Some of the canine SNPs exist in codons that are evolutionary conserved between five compared species, and predictions indicate that they may have a functional effect on the protein. The reported coding SNP frequency of the studied genes falls within the range of SNP frequencies reported earlier in the dog and other mammalian species. Novel SNPs are presented and the results show a significant genetic variation in expressed sequences in this group of genes. The results can contribute to an improved understanding of the genetics of behaviour.

Methods

Materials

Blood samples were collected from eight dogs of eight different breeds – rottweiler, Labrador retriever, Newfoundland, golden retriever, English setter, boxer, Norwegian lundehund and German shepherd. All dogs were healthy pets visiting the veterinary clinic for routine control.

DNA isolation

DNA was isolated from 10 ml of EDTA-blood by the phenol-chloroform method [33]. DNA was aliquoted and stored at -20°C.

Identification of genomic sequences

The initial identification of relevant canine sequence was performed using comparative genomics, facilitated through the high degree of similarity between human and canine genomes [28, 29]. Published human and canine sequences from NCBI and ENSEMBLE were aligned and primers were designed to amplify exonic sequence (primer 3, [34]).

The selected exonic sequences originated from a total of 18 genes, consisting of nine serotonin G protein-coupled receptors and one ligand-gated ion channel, three dopamine G protein-coupled receptors and additionally exons from four genes related to serotonin and dopamine formation and synaptic clearance. The study also included one enzymatic gene related to synthesis of norepinephrine (Table 1).

PCR amplification and SNP detection

Primers flanking each of the exon sequences of 12 serotonin-, five dopamine- and one norepinephrine-related genes (Table 1) were run in PCR with ~25 ng of canine genomic DNA as template, 1.5 μl 10× PCR buffer containing 15 mM MgCl2 (Qiagen), 0.6 μl dNTP (2.5 mM), 0.5 μl PCR primer, forward and reverse (5 pmol/μl), 0.05 μl Taq DNA Polymerase (5 U/μl, Qiagen) and water to a total volume of 15 μl. Initial denaturation at 95°C (2 1/2 min.), followed by 34 cycles of 95°C (30 sec.), 58°C (40 sec.), 72°C (50 sec.) and finally at 72°C (5 min.). Primers not providing specific PCR products by these conditions were run at 95°C (2 1/2 min.), followed by 34 cycles of 95°C (30 sec.), 60°C (40 sec.), 72°C (50 sec.) and finally at 72°C (5 min.).

The obtained PCR products were sequenced in both forward and reverse directions with the same PCR primers, by the MegaBACE™ 1000 DNA Analysis Systems (Amersham Biosciences) using the DYEnamic™ ET Dye Terminator Kit (Amersham Biosciences). Reaction conditions were as follows: 4 μl ET reagent premix, 4.5 μl H2O, 1 μl PCR-product and 0.5 μl primer (5 μM) with the following step repeated 28 times: 95°C (15 sec.), 58°C (10 sec.), 60°C (1 min.). The post-reaction cleanup was performed as recommended by the protocol with ethanol and 7.5 M ammonium acetate. SNPs were identified by aligning and comparing the sequence data with Sequencher 4.1.4 (Gene Codes Co.)

SNP description and possible amino acid change

Reference sequences were displayed from available databases and open reading frames (ORFs) defined. Further alignment and translation with Sequencher 4.1.4 (Gene Codes Co.) defined the codons and amino acid changes (Table 2). Alignment of protein sequences with nsSNPs (reference sequences in Table 2) for detection of conservation across species was performed with ClustalW [25]. Prediction of a possible damaging effect of the amino acid substitutions caused by the nsSNPs was performed with PolyPhen [4].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Ewen Kirkness at TIGR for providing sequence information from the standard poodle genome (1,5X) in an early phase of the project, and Aina H. Rengmark for substantial help in the sequencing of SNPs. Project support from Division of Genetics, Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway, and The Research Council of Norway, grant no. 138793/130.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Genetics, Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science

References

  1. Savitz JB, Ramesar RS: Genetic variants implicated in personality: a review of the more promising candidates. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004, 131: 20-32. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Manuck SB, Flory JD, Ferrell RE, Dent KM, Mann JJ, Muldoon MF: Aggression and anger-related traits associated with a polymorphism of the tryptophan hydroxylase gene. Biol Psychiatry. 1999, 45: 603-614. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00375-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner HG, Nelen M, Breakefield XO, Ropers HH, van Oost BA: Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science. 1993, 262: 578-580. 10.1126/science.8211186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ramensky V, Bork P, Sunyaev S: Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 3894-3900. 10.1093/nar/gkf493.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kravitz EA: Serotonin and aggression: insights gained from a lobster model system and speculations on the role of amine neurons in a complex behavior. J Comp Physiol [A]. 2000, 186: 221-238. 10.1007/s003590050423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Stevenson PA, Dyakonova V, Rillich J, Schildberger K: Octopamine and experience-dependent modulation of aggression in crickets. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 1431-1441. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4258-04.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Overli O, Pottinger TG, Carrick TR, Overli E, Winberg S: Brain monoaminergic activity in rainbow trout selected for high and low stress responsiveness. Brain Behav Evol. 2001, 57: 214-224. 10.1159/000047238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feltenstein MW, Sufka KJ: Screening antidepressants in the chick separation-stress paradigm. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005, 181: 153-159. 10.1007/s00213-005-2227-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wendland JR, Lesch KP, Newman TK, Timme A, Gachot-Neveu H, Thierry B, Suomi SJ: Differential functional variability of serotonin transporter and monoamine oxidase a genes in macaque species displaying contrasting levels of aggression-related behavior. Behav Genet. 2006, 36: 163-172. 10.1007/s10519-005-9017-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Marino MD, Bourdelat-Parks BN, Cameron LL, Weinshenker D: Genetic reduction of noradrenergic function alters social memory and reduces aggression in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2005, 161: 197-203. 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.02.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shih JC, Grimsby J, Chen K, Zhu QS: Structure and promoter organization of the human monoamine oxidase A and B genes. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1993, 18: 25-32.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen K, Holschneider DP, Wu W, Rebrin I, Shih JC: A spontaneous point mutation produces monoamine oxidase A/B knock-out mice with greatly elevated monoamines and anxiety-like behavior. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 39645-39652. 10.1074/jbc.M405550200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen X, Wang X, O'Neill AF, Walsh D, Kendler KS: Variants in the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) gene are associated with schizophrenia in Irish high-density families. Mol Psychiatry. 2004, 9: 962-967. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Curran S, Purcell S, Craig I, Asherson P, Sham P: The serotonin transporter gene as a QTL for ADHD. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005, 134: 42-47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank B, Niesler B, Nothen MM, Neidt H, Propping P, Bondy B, Rietschel M, Maier W, Albus M, Rappold G: Investigation of the human serotonin receptor gene HTR3B in bipolar affective and schizophrenic patients. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004, 131: 1-5. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30070.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Maron E, Nikopensius T, Koks S, Altmae S, Heinaste E, Vabrit K, Tammekivi V, Hallast P, Koido K, Kurg A, Metspalu A, Vasar E, Vasar V, Shlik J: Association study of 90 candidate gene polymorphisms in panic disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 2005, 15: 17-24. 10.1097/00041444-200503000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Saudou F, Amara DA, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Ramboz S, Segu L, Buhot MC, Hen R: Enhanced aggressive behavior in mice lacking 5-HT1B receptor. Science. 1994, 265 (5180): 1875-1878. 10.1126/science.8091214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brouillette JA, Andrew JR, Venta PJ: Estimate of nucleotide diversity in dogs with a pool-and-sequence method. Mamm Genome. 2000, 11: 1079-1086. 10.1007/s003350010220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Masuda K, Hashizume C, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y: Breed differences in genotype and allele frequency of catechol O-methyltransferase gene polymorphic regions in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 2004, 66: 183-187. 10.1292/jvms.66.183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. van den Berg L, Kwant L, Hestand MS, van Oost BA, Leegwater PA: Structure and variation of three canine genes involved in serotonin binding and transport: the serotonin receptor 1A gene (htr1A), serotonin receptor 2A gene (htr2A), and serotonin transporter gene (slc6A4). J Hered. 2005, 96: 786-796. 10.1093/jhered/esi108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Masuda K, Hashizume C, Ogata N, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y: Sequencing of canine 5-hydroxytriptamine receptor (5-HTR) 1B, 2A, 2C genes and identification of polymorphisms in the 5-HTR1B gene. J Vet Med Sci. 2004, 66: 965-972. 10.1292/jvms.66.965.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. van den Berg L, Versteeg SA, van Oost BA: Isolation and characterization of the canine serotonin receptor 1A gene (htr1A). J Hered. 2003, 94: 49-56. 10.1093/jhered/esg013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. van den Berg L, Imholz S, Versteeg SA, Leegwater PA, Zijlstra C, Bosma AA, van Oost BA: Isolation and characterization of the canine serotonin receptor 1B gene (htr1B). Gene. 2004, 326: 131-139. 10.1016/j.gene.2003.10.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. HomoloGene: HomoloGene. 2008, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/]Google Scholar
  25. ClustalW: ClustalW. 2008, [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/]Google Scholar
  26. Lee MA, Keane OM, Glass BC, Manley TR, Cullen NG, Dodds KG, McCulloch AF, Morris CA, Schreiber M, Warren J, Zadissa A, Wilson T, McEwan JC: Establishment of a pipeline to analyse non-synonymous SNPs in Bos taurus. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 298-10.1186/1471-2164-7-298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao Z, Fu YX, Hewett-Emmett D, Boerwinkle E: Investigating single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density in the human genome and its implications for molecular evolution. Gene. 2003, 312: 207-213. 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00670-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkness EF, Bafna V, Halpern AL, Levy S, Remington K, Rusch DB, Delcher AL, Pop M, Wang W, Fraser CM, Venter JC: The dog genome: survey sequencing and comparative analysis. Science. 2003, 301: 1898-1903. 10.1126/science.1086432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, Chang JL, Kulbokas EJIII, Zody MC, Mauceli E, Xie X, Breen M, Wayne RK, Ostrander EA, Ponting CP, Galibert F, Smith DR, DeJong PJ, Kirkness E, Alvarez P, Biagi T, Brockman W, Butler J, Chin CW, Cook A, Cuff J, Daly MJ, DeCaprio D, Gnerre S: Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005, 438: 803-819. 10.1038/nature04338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sunyaev S, Ramensky V, Koch I, Lathe W, Kondrashov AS, Bork P: Prediction of deleterious human alleles. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10: 591-597. 10.1093/hmg/10.6.591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jegga AG, Gowrisankar S, Chen J, Aronow BJ: PolyDoms: a whole genome database for the identification of non-synonymous coding SNPs with the potential to impact disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D700-D706. 10.1093/nar/gkl826.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ng PC, Henikoff S: SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3812-3814. 10.1093/nar/gkg509.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sambrook J, Fitsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Edited by: Fritsch EF and Maniatis T. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  34. Primer3: Primer3. 2008, [http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi]Google Scholar
  35. OMIM: OMIM. www ncbi nlm nih gov/entrez/query fcgi?db=OMIM. 2008, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=OMIM]Google Scholar
  36. dbSNP: dbSNP. 2008, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_blastByOrg.cgi]Google Scholar
  37. Lehninger AL: Principles of biochemistry. Edited by: Nelson DL and Cox MM. 1993, New York, WorthGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Våge and Lingaas; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement