GpnmbR 150Xallele must be present in bone marrow derived cells to mediate DBA/2J glaucoma
- Michael G Anderson†1, 2,
- K Saidas Nair†3,
- Leslie A Amonoo1,
- Adrienne Mehalow3,
- Colleen M Trantow1,
- Sharmila Masli4 and
- Simon WM John3, 5, 6Email author
© Anderson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 07 November 2007
Accepted: 10 April 2008
Published: 10 April 2008
The Gpnmb gene encodes a transmembrane protein whose function(s) remain largely unknown. Here, we assess if a mutant allele of Gpnmb confers susceptibility to glaucoma by altering immune functions. DBA/2J mice have a mutant Gpnmb gene and they develop a form of glaucoma preceded by a pigment dispersing iris disease and abnormalities of the immunosuppressive ocular microenvironment.
We find that the Gpnmb genotype of bone-marrow derived cell lineages significantly influences the iris disease and the elevation of intraocular pressure. GPNMB localizes to multiple cell types, including pigment producing cells, bone marrow derived F4/80 positive antigen-presenting cells (APCs) of the iris and dendritic cells. We show that APCs of DBA/2J mice fail to induce antigen induced immune deviation (a form of tolerance) when treated with TGFβ2. This demonstrates that some of the immune abnormalities previously identified in DBA/2J mice result from intrinsic defects in APCs. However, the tested APC defects are not dependent on a mutant Gpnmb gene. Finally, we show that the Gpnmb mediated iris disease does not require elevated IL18 or mature B or T lymphocytes.
These results establish a role for Gpnmb in bone marrow derived lineages. They suggest that affects of Gpnmb on innate immunity influence susceptibility to glaucoma in DBA/2J mice.
The glaucomas are a common group of potentially blinding diseases that by 2010 will affect approximately 60 million people worldwide . The glaucomas share a clinical phenotype including a progressive degeneration of the optic nerve [2, 3]. This glaucomatous optic neuropathy causes a progressive and irreversible loss of vision, and may lead to complete blindness. Significant known risk factors for glaucoma include elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), aging, positive family history, race, abnormal optic nerve head morphology and decreased central corneal thickness [4–12]. Of these, the only currently modifiable risk factor is IOP, which is the target of all existing glaucoma treatments [13–15]. One means of gaining a better understanding of glaucoma pathogenesis, and ultimately the creation of new therapeutic interventions, is to study the underlying molecular pathways with experimental systems such as the mouse. With the recent descriptions of mouse strains and techniques relevant to studying glaucoma, genetic approaches in mice offer great promise for testing new and potentially novel hypotheses related to glaucoma [16–19].
Experiments with DBA/2J (D2) mice have suggested that immune abnormalities may contribute to some forms of glaucoma [20, 21]. D2 mice develop a form of glaucoma involving a pigment dispersing iris disease that aberrantly deposits pigment throughout the anterior chamber, including the drainage structures of the eye [22–24]. As a consequence, D2 and several closely related strains develop elevated IOP and glaucomatous neuropathy [24–30]. Eyes of D2 mice also exhibit multiple abnormalities in ocular immune privilege , including deficient anterior chamber associated immune deviation (ACAID). Importantly, the iris pigment dispersion component of the D2 iris disease and the inability to support ACAID are simultaneously rescued when their marrow is repopulated with cells from B6D2F1 mice . While the bone marrow origin of immune cells involved in ACAID explains the restoration of ACAID by B6D2F1 bone marrow cells (BMC), the simultaneous resolution of the pigment dispersing iris disease links this disease to bone marrow derived cells. The B6D2F1 mice that served as a source of normal BMC are offspring of a cross between glaucoma prone D2 and normal C57BL/6J (B6) mice. These B6D2F1 mice are heterozygous for all B6 and D2 specific alleles across the entirety of the autosomal genome. Therefore, no specific genes were mechanistically implicated in the recovery of ACAID or the iris disease. The goal of the current experiments is to identify the gene(s) responsible for mediating this BMC contribution to D2 phenotype.
Genetic experiments have previously shown that mutations in two genes digenically promote glaucoma in D2 mice, Tyrp1 and Gpnmb [22, 23]. The Tyrp1 gene encodes a relatively well characterized melanosomal enzyme that is required for eumelanogenesis and is localized at the melanosomal membrane. So far there are no reports of either expression or influence of this gene on cell types derived from the bone marrow. Therefore, Tyrp1 is unlikely to be relevant in the BMC mediated glaucoma phenotype of D2 mice. Less is known concerning Gpnmb. The Gpnmb gene is predicted to encode a transmembrane protein with homology to the melanosomal protein, silver (pMel17), but the function(s) of GPNMB remain largely unknown. Interestingly, Gpnmb is expressed by some BM derived cell types . Recent studies demonstrate that GPNMB is expressed by macrophages and functions as a negative regulator of macrophage mediated inflammatory responses . In another study, it was reported that GPNMB binds activated T cells. This binding causes inhibition of TCR-induced T-cell activation for both primary and secondary immune responses . Thus, Gpnmb is an attractive candidate that potentially influences the BMC mediated phenotypes in D2 mice.
Here, we test the hypothesis that the Gpnmb gene contributes to the bone marrow dependent events in D2 glaucoma. Using D2 mice that only differ in Gpnmb genotype , we demonstrate that BMC lineages containing wild-type Gpnmb can rescue both the pigment dispersing iris disease and IOP elevation of D2 mice. Because GPNMB protein localizes to BM derived antigen-presenting cells (APCs) of the iris and to cultured dendritic cells, we assessed potential phenotypes that may be modulated by these APCs. First, we find that APCs of D2 mice are abnormal in that they fail to induce ACAID, this effect is not dependent on Gpnmb. Second, we examined aqueous humor levels of IL18. Bone marrow derived APCs in the iris are a potential source of IL18  and IL18 is reported to become elevated in the aqueous humor of D2 mice as disease progresses . In contrast to the previous report , we find no evidence for involvement of IL18 in the D2 disease. Surprisingly, we finally show that effectors of adaptive immune responses, mature B or T lymphocytes, are not necessary to mediate the glaucoma inducing iris disease of D2 mice.
Gpnmb is a candidate for mediating BM derived contributions to D2 ocular disease
Having found that Gpnmb was expressed in the appropriate tissues, we next assessed the nature of the GpnmbR 150Xmutation. The GpnmbR 150Xmutation in D2 mice creates a premature stop codon. As a result of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, the mutation is predicted to result in a severe decrease in Gpnmb transcript levels . To test this, a quantitative real-time PCR assay for Gpnmb was performed. Expression in irides of young predisease D2 mice homozygous for the GpnmbR 150Xmutation was compared to age and sex matched wild-type controls. With samples normalized to levels of Rn18s, the GpnmbR 150Xmutation resulted in a severe reduction in Gpnmb transcript levels (~18 fold, data not shown). In agreement with this, no protein with the expected molecular size was detected by Western analysis using a GPNMB antibody (Fig. 1B). Similar analysis of Tyrp1 levels demonstrated no significant change in transcript levels. The expression of Gpnmb in immune tissues and the absence of GPNMB protein in R150X mutants support the hypothesis that this mutation disrupts BMC lineage dependent functions of GPNMB and that it may be responsible for bone marrow mediated aspects of the D2 disease.
A functional requirement for Gpnmb in bone marrow
Lethally irradiated D2 mice were reconstituted with D2-Gpnmb+bone marrow and followed clinically for indications of iris disease (Fig. 2K–O). In all figures and text, the genotype of donor bone marrow is written first followed by an arrow and then the recipient genotype. For example, WT → R150X where D2-Gpnmb+ (WT) bone marrow was transferred into D2 mice homozygous for the R150X mutation. At ages when the D2 iris disease is normally severe, iris phenotypes in D2 mice reconstituted with D2-Gpnmb+ bone marrow were significantly rescued toward the wild-type iris phenotype. They developed less pigment dispersion, less transillumination, and less change in the dimensions of the anterior chamber as compared to both unmanipulated D2 mice (compare Fig 2K–O with 2F–J) and D2 mice that were reconstituted with standard D2 marrow that had the GpnmbR 150Xmutation [20, 37]. The converse experiment reconstituting lethally irradiated D2-Gpnmb+ mice with standard D2 bone marrow (R150X → WT) was also performed (Fig. 2P–T). Iris phenotypes of D2-Gpnmb+ mice reconstituted with standard D2 bone marrow were unaltered and maintained an iris indistinguishable from unmanipulated D2-Gpnmb+ mice (compare Fig. 2P–T with 2A–E). In sum, these results indicate that the GpnmbR 150Xmutation results in the bone-marrow derived portion of the D2 iris disease. However, the influence of the GpnmbR 150Xmutation acting via bone marrow derived lineages is not itself sufficient toinduce the iris disease in otherwise healthy mice.
IOP elevation in D2 mice can be modulated by Gpnmb bone marrow genotype
Importantly, 10-mo D2 mice reconstituted with D2-Gpnmb+ bone marrow (WT → R150X) had a mean IOP of 16 mmHg, indicating that the influence of Gpnmb in bone marrow was able to prevent IOP elevation from occurring. Furthermore, the IOP of D2 mice reconstituted with D2-Gpnmb+ bone marrow (WT → R150X) remained at these normal levels to at least 16-mo. These results further support the conclusion that the GpnmbR 150Xmutation influences the glaucoma phenotype of D2 mice via BMC lineages.
GPNMB localization within F4/80 positive APCs
The iris normally contains a robust population of APCs  and GPNMB has previously been demonstrated to be present in mouse DCs . To determine if a portion of GPNMB in the iris is within APCs, the APC marker F4/80 was tested for co-localization with GPNMB protein. In adult C57BL/6J mice, GPNMB was indeed present within the cytoplasm of iridial F4/80 positive cells (Fig. 4G). To assess the localization of GPNMB in DC lineages, bone marrow progenitors were grown in cell culture, stimulated to differentiate into DCs, and utilized for immunohistochemistry. In DC cells grown in these conditions, GPNMB was observed in intracellular granules (Fig. 4H). Because F4/80 positive APCs and DCs are BM derived cell lineages, this result indicates that the bone marrow functions of Gpnmb are likely to be mediated, in part or in whole, by these cells.
Gpnmb deficient APCs fail to induce immune deviation
We next determined the effect of the Gpnmb mutation on the ability of APCs to induce immune deviation. The healthy eye exists in a state of immunologic balance that provides immune protection by decreasing risk of immunopathogenic injury to ocular tissues . Anterior chamber associated immune deviation (ACAID) is an anti-inflammatory mechanism that is a form of eye-dependent tolerance mediated by ocular APCs. The immune deviation is initiated by F4/80+ ocular APCs that capture antigen in the eye and migrate via the blood to the spleen . At that site, these APCs generate a population of regulatory T cells capable of inhibiting a Th1-mediated inflammatory immune responses such as a delayed type hypersensitivity response (DTH). We have previously demonstrated that D2 mice lack the ability to support ACAID as evidenced by their inability to inhibit a DTH response, but the genes responsible for this finding are not defined .
In parallel with these experiments, we tested the ability of TGFβ-treated APCs from B6.Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150Xcongenic mice to induce tolerance. These congenic mice have the D2-derived Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150Xmutations on a B6 genetic background (Methods). Also, we evaluated the expression of a panel of genes for which coordinate changes in expression normally contribute to the immune deviation inducing phenotype of APCs [51–53]. Similar to D2 APCs, the B6.Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150Xderived APCs failed to induce immune deviation when treated with TGFβ2 (Fig. 5A). Arguing against a causative role for the Tyrp1 mutation, BALB/c mice have the same Tyrp1 b mutation but do not have deficiencies in ACAID . Together, our results suggest that a gene(s) that resides in one of the D2-derived chromosomal regions may be important in mediating APC induced tolerance. (D2-derived chromosomal regions surround the Tyrp1 and Gpnmb genes in the B6 congenic mice ). In agreement with this, the coordinated pattern of changes in gene expression that support immune deviating properties of APCs exhibited a classic tolerizing pattern in B6 mice, but not in D2 (Figure 5B), D2-Gpnmb+ or B6.Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150XAPCs (data not shown).
Neither Gpnmb genotype, nor age, influence aqueous humor levels of IL18
Deficiency of Rag1 does not affect Gpnmb mediated disease
D2 mice develop a pigmentary form of glaucoma involving a pigment dispersing iris disease, increased IOP, and degeneration of retinal ganglion cells [22–24, 26]. In recent years, we have begun to study early events within the anterior chamber that initiate the iris disease and IOP elevation [20, 22, 23, 43] as well as later events associated with the neurodegeneration [37, 54, 55]. We have previously identified two genes responsible for the initiation of this disease, Tyrp1 and Gpnmb, both of which encode melanosomal proteins [22, 42, 56]. We have also shown that a non-melanosomal component contributes to the D2 iris disease which acts via a BMC lineage . Here, we have identified the Gpnmb gene as an important gene influencing these bone marrow derived contributions.
From the sum of prior and present experiments (see Additional File 2 and refs [20, 22]), an attractive hypothesis suggests that the D2 iris disease initially involves a melanosomal defect mediated by the Tyrp1 and Gpnmb genes that mildly damages the iris and causes cellular debris, including pigment, to be shed into the anterior chamber. Due to deficiency of GPNMB, a bone marrow derived lineage(s) that would normally express Gpnmb then reacts abnormally to the iris debris. This results in an inflammatory attack on the iris, severe iris atrophy and the ensuing glaucoma. The abnormally responding bone marrow derived lineage may either fail to inhibit ocular inflammation or may actively promote an inflammatory attack on the iris. This model accounts for the ability of B6D2F1  or D2-Gpnmb+ (Fig. 2) bone marrow to suppress the D2 iris disease (because bone derived cells with wild-type Gpnmb alleles do not respond abnormally to the debris resulting from the melanosomal insults and mild iris damage). Additionally, this model explains why bone marrow from D2 mice with the GpnmbR 150Xmutation is not sufficient to confer the severe iris disease when transplanted into recipient mice with wild-type Gpnmb alleles (because the recipients with wild-type Gpnmb alleles do not have sufficient iris damage to prime the immune system attack of the iris.). Thus, this model, explains why the bone marrow derived function of Gpnmb is a necessary, but not sufficient, component of the overall disease.
The functions of Gpnmb in BMC derived lineage(s) that are relevant to DBA/2J glaucoma remain unknown. Although Gpnmb genotype did not influence the ability of D2 APCs to mediate tolerance to OVA when they were first exposed to TGFβ2 and OVA in culture, GPNMB may still modulate some aspects of APCs that contribute to D2 phenotype and were not assessed. These functions may include their ability to process and present antigens derived from damaged iris cells, their ability to secrete various chemokines that recruit proinflammatory cells or their ability to respond to anti-inflammatory molecules in the ocular microenvironment. Regardless, we show that the immune abnormalities contributing to the Gpnmb mediated iris disease do not require functions of the adaptive immune system. This suggests that GPNMB deficiency may influence innate immune cells that are of bone marrow origin and are likely to respond to abnormalities in the iris. Experimental expression of GPNMB in activated macrophage causes reduced release of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL6, IL12 and TNF alpha . We localize GPNMB within APCs. Therefore, it is possible that the GpnmbR 150Xmutation alters APCs so that they are more prone to mediate inflammation and this abnormal phenotype promotes ocular inflammation in D2 mice.
Other groups have previously localized GPNMB in macrophages and in the MHC class II compartment of DCs . The punctate localization of GPNMB in pigmented cells and its melanosomal targeting sequence are consistent with another function of GPNMB in melanosomes . Interestingly, melanosomes and the MHC class II compartment are both lysosome-related organelles [57, 58]. This correlation suggests that similar to molecules such as BLOC complexes and LYST [59, 60], GPNMB may be a molecule that functions in multiple classes of lysosome-related organelles.
The glaucomatous potential of the DBA/2J iris disease has recently been shown to be strikingly sensitive to genetic background . When transferred to the C57BL/6J genetic background, the GpnmbR 150Xand Tyrp1 b mutations result in a severe pigment dispersing iris disease that is phenotypically indistinguishable from the iris disease of D2 mice. Surprisingly, however, these B6 mice are resistant to IOP elevation and glaucoma. Thus, there are additional modifier genes whose alleles determine whether or not IOP becomes elevated and glaucoma ensues. Although these modifier genes remain to be identified, our preliminary data suggest existence of at least 3 genetic loci, on different chromosomes to Gpnmb and Tyrp1, that impact the nature of the anterior chamber disease and determine if IOP becomes elevated. Given the dependence of the iris disease on bone marrow genotype, at least some of these modifiers are likely to influence immune functions. Since the chromosomal region containing either Gpnmb or Tyrp1 transferred the inability of APCs to mediate tolerance to the B6 congenic strain, there must be another strain specific allele that influences APC functions. Efforts to identify these strain specific modifier alleles are underway and are likely to shed additional light on the molecular basis of immune contributions to this glaucoma. Characterizing these genes is expected to improve understanding of APC responses within the anterior chamber and mechanisms of inducing tolerance.
We have demonstrated that Gpnmb influences the glaucoma phenotype of D2 mice by a BM derived mechanism that does not require adaptive immunity. Although immunity has not yet been shown to contribute to human pigmentary glaucoma, the inflammation is subclinical in the mice and may have been undetectable on standard examination of patient's eyes. Thus, similar mechanisms of mild inflammation may be active in human pigmentary glaucoma and perhaps other ocular diseases in which pigment dispersal occurs within the anterior chamber. These findings represent an important step toward gaining a molecular understanding of the mechanisms active in this pigmentary form of glaucoma
D2 mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. Some studies also utilized B6.D2-Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150X/Sj mice (referred to as B6 Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150X), an N10 congenic strain of mice which are homozygous for chromosomal intervals containing the D2-derived Tyrp1 b and GpnmbR 150Xmutations that have been backcrossed into the C57BL/6J genetic background . Mice with a recombination activating gene 1 mutation (Rag1tm 1Mom) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and crossed to the B6.Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150Xstrain to produce mutants that were homozygous for all three mutations (B6.Cg-Rag1tm 1MomTyrp1 b GpnmbR 150X/Sj, referred to as Rag1 mutant B6 Tyrp1 b GpnmbR 150X). Two strains of control mice with wild-type Gpnmb alleles were utilized in these studies, DBA/2J with a wild-type Gpnmb allele (DBA/2J-Gpnmb+/Sj, referred to as D2-Gpnmb+)  and C57BL/6J. Since the Gpnmb+allele is the ancestral D2 allele, the GpnmbR 150Xmutation is the only known genetic difference between the D2 and D2-Gpnmb+ strains . C57BL/6J mice (with wild-type Tyrp1 and Gpnmb alleles) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All D2 background mice were maintained on a 6% fat NIH 31 diet provided ad libitum, and the water was acidified to pH 2.8–3.2. All B6 background mice were similarly maintained but on an NIH 31 diet with 4% fat content. Mice were housed in cages containing white pine bedding and covered with polyester filters. The environment was kept at 21°C with a 14-h light:10-h dark cycle. All animals were treated according to the guidelines of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology for use of animals in research. All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of The Jackson Laboratory or The University of Iowa.
Generation and analysis of bone marrow chimeras
Bone marrow chimeras were generated as follows: 4–8 wk old female D2 and D2-Gpnmb+ mice were lethally irradiated (1000 rad from a 137Cs source) and then received 200 μl intravenous injections containing 5 × 106 T cell depleted bone marrow cells from the indicated donor strains. Donor marrow was depleted of T lymphocytes with 10 μg/mL of purified monoclonal antibodies to CD4 (GK1.5; The Jackson Laboratory Flow Cytometry Service, Bar Harbor, Maine) and CD8a (53–6.72; The Jackson Laboratory Flow Cytometry Service). Eyes of chimeras were clinically assayed at 2–3 mo intervals.
Intraocular pressure measurement
IOP was measured using the microneedle method as previously described in detail [61, 62]. Because the IOPs of B6 mice are very consistent, B6 mice were interspersed with experimental mice during all experiments as a methodological control to ensure proper equipment calibration and performance.
Eyes were examined with a slit-lamp bio-microscope and photographed with a 40× objective lens. Phenotypic assessment of iris disease was determined by indices of iris atrophy dispersed pigment and transillumination defects following previously described criteria [20, 22–24]. Transillumination is an assay of iris disease whereby reflected light passing through depigmented areas of iris tissue are visualized as red light.
RNA Isolation and Quantitative RT-PCR
Tissues were dissected, homogenized, and total RNA extracted. cDNA was generated using 300 ng of total RNA isolated from dissected irides or 70 ng of total RNA isolated from ciliary body enriched dissections. Real-time PCR data were collected utilizing standard reaction conditions, with primer efficiencies determined from serial dilutions of cDNA and relative expression calculated as previously published [63–65]. Reaction conditions and primer sequences are available upon request.
Iris tissue from D2 and D2-Gpnmb+ was homogenized in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150 mM NACl, 1% Triton X-100 and supplemented with protease inhibitors). The lysate was resolved on a 4–20% SDS-PAGE gradient gel. Proteins were blotted to a PVDF membrane, followed by incubation with anti-GPNMB antibody (R&D systems), secondary antibody and detected using SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce Biotechnology).
Enucleated eyes were embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature embedding medium (Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound, Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Torrance, CA), seven-micrometer sections cut, and sections transferred to glass slides (CryoJane, Instrumedics, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Cryosections were air dried for 30 min at room temperature, fixed for 5 min in ice-cold acetone, again air dried for 30 min at room temperature, and rehydrated in PBS for 5 min. Sections were blocked 1 hr at room temperature with 10% normal donkey serum and 30 mg/mL BSA in PBS. Primary antibodies were applied for 1 hr at room temperature using polyclonal rabbit anti-GPNMB antibody (diluted 1:200; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) or anti-F4/80 (diluted 1:200; Serotec Inc., Raleigh, NC). Primary antibody was removed by three washes (5 min each) in PBS and the sections were treated for 1 hr at room temperature with AlexaFluor conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200 dilution, Invitrogen-Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA) diluted in 1% normal donkey serum and 10 mg/mL BSA in PBS. After three washes in PBS, the sections were mounted (Vectashield, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and viewed by fluorescence microscopy. All photomicrographs were taken with identical camera settings. For studies of bone marrow derived dendritic cell cultures, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-GPNMB antibody (diluted 1:200; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) for 1 hr at room temperature, washed three times in PBS, and treated for 1 hr at room temperature with FITC conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200 dilution, Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA). After three washes in PBS, the cells were mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (Vectashield, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and viewed by confocal microscopy.
Bone marrow derived dendritic cell cultures
BM derived cells obtained from D2 or D2-Gpnmb+ mouse femur were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF (20 ng/ml) in 24 well plates (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA). The nonadherent cells were removed from the culture and replated with fresh medium containing GM-CSF every alternate day. On day 10, cells were harvested and a subset analysed by flow cytometry. In the current experiments, >95% of cells labeled positive for the mouse APC marker CD11c.
Analysis of aqueous humor IL18
Aqueous humor was collected as described previously . IL18 protein level in the aqueous humor was measured using a commercially available ELISA assay following the manufacturer's recommended protocol (Bender MedSystems, San Bruno, CA). Since overall protein levels in D2 aqueous humor are increased in older mice (at 6 and 9 mo) , samples were compared by analyzing equal volumes of aqueous humor rather than normalizing to total protein.
Assay for immune deviation
Peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) were obtained 3 days following 2 ml intra-peritoneal injections of a 3% thioglycollate solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Plastic adherent macrophages from these cells were used as APCs (>95% F4/80+). Cells were cultured overnight (1 × 105/well) in a 96-well plate in the presence of TGFβ2 (R&D Systems, CA, USA, 5 ng/ml final concentration) in serum free culture media, and pulsed with ovalbumin antigen (OVA) (7 mg/ml). Adherent cells were harvested, after washing off culture medium with cold Hank's balanced salt solution, and intravenously injected into B6D2F1 recipients (5 × 10 3 cells/mouse). Seven days following, recipients were immunized subcutaneously into the nape of the neck with OVA/CFA (50 μg). Animals that did not receive any APCs or immunization served as a negative control. A week later, animals in all groups received intra-dermal inoculation of OVA (200 μg/20 μl) into their right ear pinna. The left ear served as an untreated control. Thickness of both ears was measured immediately before and at 24-h interval after the OVA injection using a micrometer (Mitutoyo 227-101, MTI Corp., Paramus, NJ, USA). The measurements were performed in triplicates. Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) was measured as ear swelling [(24-h measurement – 0-h measurement in the experimental ear) – (24-h measurement – 0-h measurement in the untreated control ear)]. Immune deviation was detected as the suppression in DTH in the recipients of TGFβ2 treated APCs as compared to those infused with untreated APCs. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used with significance assumed at P < 0.05. DTH results were confirmed by repeating the experiments a second time.
Serum free medium
Serum-free medium (SFM) was used for in vitro assays. The medium contained: RPMI-1640, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM NEAA, 1 mM Sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml Penicillin, 100 mg/ml Streptomycin (Bio Whittaker, Walksville, MD), 0.1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and ITS+ culture supplement [1 μg/ml iron-free transferrin, 10 ng/ml linoleic acid, 0.3 ng/ml Na2Se and 0.2 μg/ml Fe(NO3)3] (Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA).
Genetic nomenclature and stocks
The official full names of genes (with abbreviations in parentheses), alleles, and stocks utilized in this study are as follows. 1. Glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb (Gpnmb). The ipd allele of Gpnmb results from the R150X premature stop codon mutation, GpnmbR 150X. 2. Tyrosinase-related protein 1 (Tyrp1). The b allele of Tyrp1 encodes two amino acid substitutions compared to the C57BL/6J-derived allele . This D2 allele is also referred to as isa in the mouse genome database and elsewhere [22, 23]. The DBA/2J stock utilized here was stock number 000671 from The Jackson Laboratory. 3. Recombination activating gene 1 (Rag1). The tm1Mom mutation is a targeted knock-out . The Rag1tm 1Momstock utilized here was B6.129S7-Rag1tm 1Mom/J (stock 002216 from The Jackson Laboratory). 4. Protein kinase, DNA activated, catalytic polypeptide (Prkdc). The scid mutation arose spontaneously in the CB17 strain and has since been backcrossed onto C57BL/6J genetic background . The Prkdc scid stock utilized here was B6.CB17-Prkdc scid /SzJ (stock 001913 from The Jackson Laboratory).
We thank O. Savinova and A. Bell for technical support in collection of IOP data as well as J. Torrance and F. Farley for help preparing the Figures and administrative assistance. We also wish to thank Dr. Wayne Streilein whose suggestions contributed to the initiation of these experiments. This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grant CA34196 (to The Jackson Laboratory), and National Eye Institute Grants F32EY07015 (MGA) and EY11721 (SWMJ). SWMJ is an Investigator of The Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
- Quigley HA, Broman AT: The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006, 90 (3): 262-267. 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G, Shields MB: Shields' Textbook of Glaucoma. 2004, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 5Google Scholar
- Nickells RW, Jampel HD, Zack DJ: Glaucoma. Emery & Rimoins Principles and Practices of Medical Genetics. Edited by: Rimoin DL, Conner MJ, Pyeritz RE, Korf BR. 2002, Churchill Livingstone, 3: 3491-3512. 4Google Scholar
- Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK, Wilson MR, Kass MA: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002, 120 (6): 714-720. discussion 829–730View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK, Wilson MR, Gordon MO: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002, 120 (6): 701-713. discussion 829–730View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR: Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996, 103 (10): 1661-1669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quigley HA: Glaucoma: macrocosm to microcosm the Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005, 46 (8): 2662-2670. 10.1167/iovs.04-1070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, Singh K: Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991, 109 (8): 1090-1095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, Sommer A: A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991, 134 (10): 1102-1110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigley HA, Javitt JC: Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994, 112 (1): 69-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinreb RN, Khaw PT: Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004, 363 (9422): 1711-1720. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16257-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Ramrattan RS, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, de Jong PT: Genetic risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Population-based familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998, 116 (12): 1640-1645.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark AF, Yorio T: Ophthalmic drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003, 2 (6): 448-459. 10.1038/nrd1106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quigley HA: New paradigms in the mechanisms and management of glaucoma. Eye. 2005, 19 (12): 1241-1248. 10.1038/sj.eye.6701746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz K, Budenz D: Current management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004, 15 (2): 119-126. 10.1097/00055735-200404000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldblum D, Mittag T: Prospects for relevant glaucoma models with retinal ganglion cell damage in the rodent eye. Vision Res. 2002, 42 (4): 471-478. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00194-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John SWM: Mechanistic insights into glaucoma provided by experimental genetics the cogan lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005, 46 (8): 2649-2661. 10.1167/iovs.05-0205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John SWM, Anderson MG, Smith RS: Mouse genetics: a tool to help unlock the mechanisms of glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1999, 8 (6): 400-412. 10.1097/00061198-199912000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinreb RN, Lindsey JD: The importance of models in glaucoma research. J Glaucoma. 2005, 14 (4): 302-304. 10.1097/01.ijg.0000169395.47921.02.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mo JS, Anderson MG, Gregory M, Smith RS, Savinova OV, Serreze DV, Ksander BR, Streilein JW, John SWM: By altering ocular immune privilege, bone marrow-derived cells pathogenically contribute to DBA/2J pigmentary glaucoma. J Exp Med. 2003, 197 (10): 1335-1344. 10.1084/jem.20022041.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Li F, Kong L, Tomita H, Li C, Cao W: Involvement of inflammation, degradation, and apoptosis in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (35): 31240-31248. 10.1074/jbc.M502641200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson MG, Smith RS, Hawes NL, Zabaleta A, Chang B, Wiggs JL, John SWM: Mutations in genes encoding melanosomal proteins cause pigmentary glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Nat Genet. 2002, 30 (1): 81-85. 10.1038/ng794.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang B, Smith RS, Hawes NL, Anderson MG, Zabaleta A, Savinova O, Roderick TH, Heckenlively JR, Davisson MT, John SWM: Interacting loci cause severe iris atrophy and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Nat Genet. 1999, 21 (4): 405-409. 10.1038/7741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John SWM, Smith RS, Savinova OV, Hawes NL, Chang B, Turnbull D, Davisson M, Roderick TH, Heckenlively JR: Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998, 39 (6): 951-962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bayer AU, Neuhardt T, May AC, Martus P, Maag KP, Brodie S, Lutjen-Drecoll E, Podos SM, Mittag T: Retinal morphology and ERG response in the DBA/2NNia mouse model of angle-closure glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001, 42 (6): 1258-1265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Libby RT, Anderson MG, Pang IH, Robinson ZH, Savinova OV, Cosma IM, Snow A, Wilson LA, Smith RS, Clark AF, John SWM: Inherited glaucoma in DBA/2J mice: pertinent disease features for studying the neurodegeneration. Vis Neurosci. 2005, 22 (5): 637-648. 10.1017/S0952523805225130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheldon WG, Warbritton AR, Bucci TJ, Turturro A: Glaucoma in food-restricted and ad libitum-fed DBA/2NNia mice. Lab Anim Sci. 1995, 45 (5): 508-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danias J, Lee KC, Zamora MF, Chen B, Shen F, Filippopoulos T, Su Y, Goldblum D, Podos SM, Mittag T: Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in aging DBA/2NNia glaucomatous mice: comparison with RGC loss in aging C57/BL6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003, 44 (12): 5151-5162. 10.1167/iovs.02-1101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inman DM, Sappington RM, Horner PJ, Calkins DJ: Quantitative correlation of optic nerve pathology with ocular pressure and corneal thickness in the DBA/2 mouse model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006, 47 (3): 986-996. 10.1167/iovs.05-0925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlamp CL, Li Y, Dietz JA, Janssen KT, Nickells RW: Progressive ganglion cell loss and optic nerve degeneration in DBA/2J mice is variable and asymmetric. BMC Neurosci. 2006, 7: 66-10.1186/1471-2202-7-66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shikano S, Bonkobara M, Zukas PK, Ariizumi K: Molecular cloning of a dendritic cell-associated transmembrane protein, DC-HIL, that promotes RGD-dependent adhesion of endothelial cells through recognition of heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (11): 8125-8134. 10.1074/jbc.M008539200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ripoll VM, Irvine KM, Ravasi T, Sweet MJ, Hume DA: Gpnmb is induced in macrophages by IFN-gamma and lipopolysaccharide and acts as a feedback regulator of proinflammatory responses. J Immunol. 2007, 178 (10): 6557-6566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chung JS, Sato K, Dougherty , Cruz PD, Ariizumi K: DC-HIL is a negative regulator of T lymphocyte activation. Blood. 2007, 109 (10): 4320-4327. 10.1182/blood-2006-11-053769.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Howell GR, Libby RT, Marchant JK, Wilson LA, Cosma IM, Smith RS, Anderson MG, John SWM: Absence of glaucoma in DBA/2J mice homozygous for wild-type versions of Gpnmb and Tyrp1. BMC Genet. 2007, 8 (1): 45-10.1186/1471-2156-8-45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boraschi D, Dinarello CA: IL-18 in autoimmunity: review. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2006, 17 (4): 224-252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maquat LE: Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in mammals. J Cell Sci. 2005, 118 (Pt 9): 1773-1776. 10.1242/jcs.01701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson MG, Libby RT, Gould DB, Smith RS, John SW: High-dose radiation with bone marrow transfer prevents neurodegeneration in an inherited glaucoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (12): 4566-4571. 10.1073/pnas.0407357102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Owen TA, Smock SL, Prakash S, Pinder L, Brees D, Krull D, Castleberry TA, Clancy YC, Marks SC, Safadi FF, Popoff SN: Identification and characterization of the genes encoding human and mouse osteoactivin. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2003, 13 (2–4): 205-220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Safadi FF, Xu J, Smock SL, Rico MC, Owen TA, Popoff SN: Cloning and characterization of osteoactivin, a novel cDNA expressed in osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2001, 84 (1): 12-26. 10.1002/jcb.1259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turque N, Denhez F, Martin P, Planque N, Bailly M, Begue A, Stehelin D, Saule S: Characterization of a new melanocyte-specific gene (QNR-71) expressed in v-myc-transformed quail neuroretina. Embo J. 1996, 15 (13): 3338-3350.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bachner D, Schroder D, Gross G: mRNA expression of the murine glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb (Gpnmb) gene is linked to the developing retinal pigment epithelium and iris. Brain Res Gene Expr Patterns. 2002, 1 (3–4): 159-165. 10.1016/S1567-133X(02)00012-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Le Borgne R, Planque N, Martin P, Dewitte F, Saule S, Hoflack B: The AP-3-dependent targeting of the melanosomal glycoprotein QNR-71 requires a di-leucine-based sorting signal. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114 (Pt 15): 2831-2841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson MG, Libby RT, Mao M, Cosma IM, Wilson LA, Smith RS, John SWM: Genetic context determines susceptibility to intraocular pressure elevation in a mouse pigmentary glaucoma. BMC Biol. 2006, 4: 20-10.1186/1741-7007-4-20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMenamin PG, Crewe J, Morrison S, Holt PG: Immunomorphologic studies of macrophages and MHC class II-positive dendritic cells in the iris and ciliary body of the rat, mouse, and human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994, 35 (8): 3234-3250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Streilein JW: Ocular immune privilege: the eye takes a dim but practical view of immunity and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2003, 74 (2): 179-185. 10.1189/jlb.1102574.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williamson JS, Bradley D, Streilein JW: Immunoregulatory properties of bone marrow-derived cells in the iris and ciliary body. Immunology. 1989, 67 (1): 96-102.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hara Y, Caspi RR, Wiggert B, Dorf M, Streilein JW: Analysis of an in vitro-generated signal that induces systemic immune deviation similar to that elicited by antigen injected into the anterior chamber of the eye. J Immunol. 1992, 149 (5): 1531-1538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hara Y, Okamoto S, Rouse B, Streilein JW: Evidence that peritoneal exudate cells cultured with eye-derived fluids are the proximate antigen-presenting cells in immune deviation of the ocular type. J Immunol. 1993, 151 (10): 5162-5171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilbanks GA, Mammolenti M, Streilein JW: Studies on the induction of anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID). III. Induction of ACAID depends upon intraocular transforming growth factor-beta. Eur J Immunol. 1992, 22 (1): 165-173. 10.1002/eji.1830220125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilbanks GA, Streilein JW: Fluids from immune privileged sites endow macrophages with the capacity to induce antigen-specific immune deviation via a mechanism involving transforming growth factor-beta. Eur J Immunol. 1992, 22 (4): 1031-1036. 10.1002/eji.1830220423.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takeuchi M, Alard P, Streilein JW: TGF-beta promotes immune deviation by altering accessory signals of antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol. 1998, 160 (4): 1589-1597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masli S, De Fazio SR, Gozzo JJ: Requirement for early donor cell chimerism during prolonged survival of murine skin allografts. Transplantation. 2000, 69 (8): 1667-1675. 10.1097/00007890-200004270-00024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masli S, Turpie B, Streilein JW: Thrombospondin orchestrates the tolerance-promoting properties of TGFbeta-treated antigen-presenting cells. International immunology. 2006, 18 (5): 689-699. 10.1093/intimm/dxl006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jakobs TC, Libby RT, Ben Y, John SWM, Masland RH: Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2J mice. J Cell Biol. 2005, 171 (2): 313-325. 10.1083/jcb.200506099.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Libby RT, Li Y, Savinova OV, Barter J, Smith RS, Nickells RW, John SWM: Susceptibility to neurodegeneration in a glaucoma is modified by Bax gene dosage. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1 (1): 17-26. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zdarsky E, Favor J, Jackson IJ: The molecular basis of brown, an old mouse mutation, and of an induced revertant to wild type. Genetics. 1990, 126 (2): 443-449.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dell'Angelica EC, Mullins C, Caplan S, Bonifacino JS: Lysosome-related organelles. Faseb J. 2000, 14 (10): 1265-1278. 10.1096/fj.14.10.1265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raposo G, Fevrier B, Stoorvogel W, Marks MS: Lysosome-related organelles: a view from immunity and pigmentation. Cell Struct Funct. 2002, 27 (6): 443-456. 10.1247/csf.27.443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li W, Rusiniak ME, Chintala S, Gautam R, Novak EK, Swank RT: Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome genes: regulators of lysosome-related organelles. Bioessays. 2004, 26 (6): 616-628. 10.1002/bies.20042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wei ML: Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome: a disease of protein trafficking and organelle function. Pigment Cell Res. 2006, 19 (1): 19-42. 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2005.00289.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John SW, Hagaman JR, MacTaggart TE, Peng L, Smithes O: Intraocular pressure in inbred mouse strains. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997, 38 (1): 249-253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Savinova OV, Sugiyama F, Martin JE, Tomarev SI, Paigen BJ, Smith RS, John SWM: Intraocular pressure in genetically distinct mice: an update and strain survey. BMC Genet. 2001, 2 (1): 12-10.1186/1471-2156-2-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kontanis EJ, Reed FA: Evaluation of real-time PCR amplification efficiencies to detect PCR inhibitors. J Forensic Sci. 2006, 51 (4): 795-804. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00182.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (9): e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF: Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett. 2003, 339 (1): 62-66. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01423-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mombaerts P, Iacomini J, Johnson RS, Herrup K, Tonegawa S, Papaioannou VE: RAG-1-deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell. 1992, 68 (5): 869-877. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90030-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blunt T, Gell D, Fox M, Taccioli GE, Lehmann AR, Jackson SP, Jeggo PA: Identification of a nonsense mutation in the carboxyl-terminal region of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in the scid mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93 (19): 10285-10290. 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10285.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar