Open Access

A highly polymorphic insertion in the Y-chromosome amelogenin gene can be used for evolutionary biology, population genetics and sexing in Cetacea and Artiodactyla

BMC Genetics20089:64

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-64

Received: 28 September 2007

Accepted: 16 October 2008

Published: 16 October 2008



The early radiation of the Cetartiodactyla is complex, and unambiguous molecular characters are needed to clarify the positions of hippotamuses, camels and pigs relative to the remaining taxa (Cetacea and Ruminantia). There is also a need for informative genealogic markers for Y-chromosome population genetics as well as a sexing method applicable to all species from this group. We therefore studied the sequence variation of a partial sequence of the evolutionary conserved amelogenin gene to assess its potential use in each of these fields.

Results and discussion

We report a large interstitial insertion in the Y amelogenin locus in most of the Cetartiodactyla lineages (cetaceans and ruminants). This sex-linked size polymorphism is the result of a 460–465 bp inserted element in intron 4 of the amelogenin gene of Ruminants and Cetaceans. Therefore, this polymorphism can easily be used in a sexing assay for these species.

When taking into account this shared character in addition to nucleotide sequence, gene genealogy follows sex-chromosome divergence in Cetartiodactyla whereas it is more congruent with zoological history when ignoring these characters. This could be related to a loss of homology between chromosomal copies given the old age of the insertion.

The 1 kbp Amel-Y amplified fragment is also characterized by high nucleotide diversity (64 polymorphic sites spanning over 1 kbp in seven haplotypes) which is greater than for other Y-chromosome sequence markers studied so far but less than the mitochondrial control region.


The gender-dependent polymorphism we have identified is relevant not only for phylogenic inference within the Cetartiodactyla but also for Y-chromosome based population genetics and gender determination in cetaceans and ruminants. One single protocol can therefore be used for studies in population and evolutionary genetics, reproductive biotechnologies, and forensic science.


About 240 to 320 million years ago, shortly after the divergence of mammalian and avian lineages, progressive X-Y differentiation began, following chromosomal interstitial rearrangements [1]. This resulted in a partial loss of homology between both chromosomes which reached its maximal extent in primates [2]. Amelogenin is the enamel matrix protein that combines with hydroxyapatite crystals to form enamel prisms in teeth [3]. The gene encoding the amelogenin protein (Amel) is among the few genes expressed from both X and Y chromosomes in placental mammals (Eutheria) [4].

Evolutionary uncertainties about the basal diversification of Cetartiodactyla

The Cetartiodactyla (even-toed ungulates, whales and dolphins) radiated approximately 70–80 Myrs ago. The relative positions of the camelid, suiform (pigs), hippopotamus, ruminant and cetacean (whales and dolphins) groups remain unclear, whether morphological or molecular characters are used for attribution [59]. Moreover, polytomies (unresolved tree nodes) within some Cetartiodactyla taxa [8] highlight areas for further data collection (both species and markers) and phylogenetic research. This is a particularly delicate problem within cetaceans, probably due to adaptative radiations within a short period of time [10, 11].

Y-chromosome sequence markers are needed for population genetics

Males are the heterogametic sex in mammals, and usually, unequal numbers of males and females transmit genes from one generation to the next. Y-specific polymorphisms should allow the inference of sex-specific population parameters and decryption of breeding system patterns and dispersal strategies. Overall, the use of Y-specific markers has been restricted to evolutionary studies of human history and some scarce studies in population genetics, perhaps because of the low diversity of these markers [12]. Within Cetartiodactyla, genetic structure or admixture, e.g. in sheep [13] or cattle [14, 15], has made use of a few Y-specific markers including microsatellites, SNPs and indels.

The matrilineally transmitted mitochondrial control region is commonly used as an informative sequence for population genetics. An equivalent had not been found to date on the Y chromosome. We considered the well-known amelogenin gene to be of particular interest because parts of it do not recombine between X and Y chromosomes.

Molecular sexing

Sex-chromosome recombination discrepancies have been exploited to develop many molecular sexing techniques. Although it can be ambiguous in some small populations, the amelogenin locus is the most commonly used for gender determination in humans [16]. Accurate gender determination in mammals is crucial to various applications in reproductive technologies, forensic investigations and population management. Some techniques rely on specific amplification of loci localized on the Y chromosome (such as Sry [17]) while others are based on amplification of homologous fragments from both X and Y chromosomes (e.g. ZFX/ZFY [18]) or use both markers [19]. Each of these has limitations, such as the need for multiplexing with other markers or additional steps such as digestion, labelling or sequencing. Several amelogenin-based techniques have expanded the taxonomic coverage of molecular sexing for Artiodactyla [2022] but they have not yet been extended to Cetacea. Therefore, there is a need both for new methods that apply to a greater number of species and to increase the number of cross-checking sexing methods, especially in conservation biology [23].

In this study, we found out that sequence variations in the amelogenin locus can be applied in evolutionary and population genetics as well as for molecular sexing in the highly diversified Cetartiodactyla group. We therefore carried out an evolutionary study of orthologous Amel-Y and Amel-X sequences (exons 4 to 5) in Cetartiodactyla. We studied four Cetacea (the striped dolphin, the bottlenosed dolphin, Risso's dolphin and the fin whale) and three Artiodactyla (cow, pig and sheep) species.

Results and Discussion

Amelogenin can be used for molecular sexing and evolutionary genetics in Cetartiodactyla

Amplification of the studied segment of the amelogenin locus using the species-specific SC1-SC2 primers resulted in an obvious sex-related size polymorphism in all Cetacea (Fig. 1) with a unique 521 bp band for females (two Amel-X copies) and an additional 980 bp band for the Amel-Y in males. This pattern was obvious in male Baleen whales (Mysticetes) but there was no corresponding Amel-X amplification in male dolphins unless by using the primers X5-X6 derived from the human amelogenin sequence. Previous studies showed that amelogenin amplification was prone to allelic drop-out or at least to preferential amplification [24]. These phenomena may be explained by several factors. Usually, amplification of the lesser sized allele is favoured when the amount of polymerase is a limiting factor or in case of template DNA degradation [25]. Small amounts o DNA may also increase stochasticity of the annealing [26]. However, our results are not consistent with these situations since the allele favoured (Amel-Y) is always the greatest one. On the other hand, differences in GC content and mismatches in the annealing sequences may account for differential amplification. The amelogenin fragments that we studied are characterized by a higher GC content when amplified from the X chromosome (56%) than from Y-chromosome (47%). This difference may result from a non-insertion in the Amel-X fragment. This feature as well as a 2 bp-long mismatch between dolphin's Amel-X and the 5' end of the reverse primer SC2 (Fig. 2) may favour preferential amplification of the Y copy in dolphins (Fig. 1b). Indeed, amplifying male dolphin samples SC3 (primer without mismatch, see Fig. 2) instead of the SC2, restores the two bands, seen in baleen whales. The presence of this large insertion in the Amel-Y copy can be used for sex determination in probably all cetacean species.
Figure 1

Sex-related size polymorphism of amelogenin fragment in Cetacean. (Molecular weight markers is Biolabs' 1 kb + ladder): a) Agarose gel showing differences between male amplification in a Baleen (toothless) whale (left of the ladder) and Toothed whales (on the right). b) Agarose gel showing differences between males and females in Striped dolphin. 1,000 bp band for Amel-Y, 500 bp band for Amel-X. Each lane represents a single sample (#1 to 5). Symbols ♂ and ♀ are for male and female samples respectively.
Figure 2

Sequence alignment of the oligonucleotide primers with target sequences in Cetacea , Cattle and Man. Species and chromosomal location are given on the right side. Shaded columns represents the nucleotide mutated in Dolphins. Accession numbers of sequences follow: Dolphins (EMBL:AM744958–AM744964, EMBL:AM744970–AM744971, EMBL:AM744968, EMBL:AY787743S2 – Y and EMBL:AM744965 – X) and Whales (EMBL:AM744967, EMBL:AM744969 -X- and EMBL:AM744966 – Y), Cattle (GenBank:AB091789 -X- and GenBank:AB091790 – Y) and Man (GenBank:NT_011757 -X- from 9098117 to 9098612 and GenBank:NC_000024 -Y- from 6796200 to 6796719).

In order to define the breakpoints of the Y insertion location and investigate its evolutionary history, we sequenced various cetaceans (listed in Methods; sequences deposited under the following accessions: EMBL:AM744958 to AM744971). After alignment with available sequences from Artiodactyla (see list in Methods), we detected the same polymorphism in all other Cetartiodactyla except the Pig (Fig. 3): a 460–465 bp insertion (size is a function of indels within different individuals or species) located between the 4th and 5th exons (188th to 651st position of Y sequences e.g. EMBL:AM744958). Haplotype names and their corresponding accessions are given in Table 1. Sequence similarity was checked by running BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) over GenBank nr/nt nucleotide collection sequences with megablast algorithm (intended for high similarity sequences). In addition to the bovine and ovine Amel-Y, the only two relevant (78 and 83% homology, E-values 4.10-68 and 3.10-53) hits matched a fragment on the seventh chromosome in pigs (ca. 250 bp), suggesting the insertion might be a transposable element.
Table 1

List of Amel-X and Amel-Y haplotype names in Cetaceans and their EMBL accession numbers

Haplotype Name

EMBL Accession

Stenella cœruleoalba YA1


Stenella cœruleoalba YA2


Stenella cœruleoalba YB1


Stenella cœruleoalba YB2


Stenella cœruleoalba YB3


Stenella cœruleoalba YB4


Stenella cœruleoalba YB5


Delphinus delphis Y1


Delphinus delphis Y2


Stenella cœruleoalba X


Grampus griseus Y


Balænoptera physalus Y


Balænoptera physalus X


Eschrichtius robustus X


Tursiops truncatus X

Figure 3

Schematic representation of the sex-related polymorphism of the amelogenin locus in an evolutionary perspective. Insertion and intron 4 are represented by a white bar, whereas exon 5 is in black. Shaded bars stands for absent data, deduced from evolutionary relationships. The vertical order links to the "tree of life" view (according [27] among others) provided on the right.

We interpret the presence of this insertion as a synapomorphy (shared character) of the Cetartiodactyla excluding pigs and probably other early derived groups (camels, hippopotamuses; [27], see Fig. 3). In addition to this long insertion, 46 other indels were detected by sequence alignment (positions and sizes detailed in Figure 5). Indels are particularly useful for testing phylogenic hypotheses, as they can provide information about ancient divergences rather than population information. We therefore assessed whether phylogenetic topologies differed if we took into account or not the information contained in these indels. Thus, the cetacean sequences summarized in Table 1 as well as Artiodactyla sequences were analyzed first classically, with gaps coded as missing characters, and secondly, with gaps coded as supplementary binary characters (see Fig. 5). For each analysis, two independent Bayesian searches were performed. The phylogenetic trees presented in Figure 4 result from a consensus of 20,000 trees sampled after standard deviation between the two runs dropped below 0.01. They show highly supported nodes. The phylogenetic analysis performed on the complete segment (Fig. 4a) confirmed the clustering by sex-chromosome copy in Cetartiodactyla (Stenella cœruleoalba, Balænoptera physalus, Grampus griseus, Tursiops truncatus, Bos taurus and Ovis aries) whereas Amel-X and Amel-Y clustered together in other mammals (Homo sapiens, Sus scrofa) together with Amel-X from Cetartiodactyla. On the other hand, phylogeny inferred without taking into account the insertion gave a different result (Fig. 4b): whereas haplotypes also clustered by chromosome in cetaceans, no signal related either to species history or to chromosome bearing could be seen in the other Cetartiodactyla. Hence, the phylogenetic signal related to species history seems to strengthen as we follow the tree from Cetartiodactyla towards primates. This partial, homoplasic, persistence of the phylogenetic signal may be explained by the influence of the region surrounding the insertion. This could be the result of the old age of the insertion (74–87 myrs [27]). The subsequent loss of homology may have given rise to a more divergent evolution between chromosomes in some taxa (Cetacea) than in others (Artiodactyla).
Figure 4

Comparison of phylogenic trees of the Amel-X and Amel-Y fragments inferred (a) with the insertion (b) without the insertion. (a) The phylogenic tree of the complete fragment shows trans-specific clustering by sex chromosome in Cetartiodactyla. Tip labels are haplotypes as deposited in the EMBL database; Y and X are for Amel-Y and Amel-X haplotypes respectively. Stenella cœruleoalba haplotypes were named according to population origin (YA/Group 1, YB/Group 2, see Methods). (b) The inferred phylogeny after removing the insertion gives a slightly different picture: trans-specific clustering by sex-chromosome is lost except in Cetaceans.
Figure 5

Polymorphic sites and indels in the Amel-X and Amel-Y regions in the Cetacean species studied. (a) Nucleotide positions are represented above and on the left side the names of the haplotypes. All positions are represented on the first sequence and each matching nucleotide on the other haplotypes is represented by a dot. (b) Indels are numbered (first row) following their order on the aligned sequences. They are characterized by their position (second row) and their length (third row). In both tables, shaded areas corresponds to the region holding the large insertion.

It would be interesting to study this region at the whole clade level by combining sequence and indel characters in the same analysis. This could give clues to test the many hypotheses about basal radiation of Cetartiodactyla (e.g. [5, 6, 8]). Given the presumably basal position of the Suioidea and Tylopoda in the Cetartiodactyla phylogeny ([7] and Fig. 3), we hypothesize that the major evolutionary event represented by the insertion (illustrated by an arrow Figure 4a) occurred once in the Cetacea-Ruminantia clade and not in the remaining Cetartiodactyla.

The presence of this large insertion in the Amel-Y copy can be useful for sex determination.

Evolutionary history also indicates that our sexing technique is applicable, in addition to cetaceans, to over a wide range of Cetartiodactyla species including domestic and wild species, in particular the widespread Ruminantia (Bovidae, Capridae and most likely Cervidae). It is however not suitable to Suiformes and further studies are required to confirm that the technique is also not applicable to Camelidae, given their even more basal position in the Cetartiodactyla phylogeny.

Use in pedigree assessment and population genetics

In dolphins, the Amel-Y fragments amplified with the SC1-SC2 primer pair were easily sequenced without the need of cloning since amplification was Y chromosome-specific. From the ten Striped dolphin samples sequenced, nine were males, and we could deduce seven distinct Y-haplotypes (one haplotype represented by three individuals and four individual haplotypes) bearing 64 polymorphic sites (nucleotide diversity π = 0.004 ± 0.0007). Half of these were in the ~460 bp insertion. An alignment of polymorphic sites is presented in Figure 5 (a). Strikingly, these sequences showed two highly divergent haplogroups, diverging by a mean of 49 substitutions. This concords with our results that support the probable existence of two subspecies within the Mediterranean sea (unpublished data). Moreover, one of these haplogroups displayed a high degree of polymorphism, with 24 informative sites, whereas the others showed only eight. These values are sufficient for use in pedigree analysis and population genetics, as the Y chromosome counterpart of the mitochondrial d-loop in this species. Indeed, in striped dolphin the intra-specific (inter-group) divergence is greater than inter-specific divergence with a mean of 45 nucleotide substitutions between the striped dolphin and fin whale sequences. There is an average of 0.048 ± 0.01 substitutions per site when comparing the two striped dolphin populations. This is comparable to the divergence observed between each population and the Common dolphin (0.058 ± 0.03) and confirms that nucleotide diversity is one order of magnitude higher than the range observed (10-4) for Y chromosome markers in mammals [12]. As for the mitochondrial d-loop, the size of the amplified fragment slightly limits the use of the technique. Some degraded samples do not amplify; even so, a particularly degraded sperm whale sample was still amplifiable (data not shown).

Since the Y chromosome population is expected to have a small effective size, it is more likely to be affected by genetic drift. Thus, it reflects more recent demographic events such as bottlenecks, expansions or founder effects [28]. To study this sort of event, one needs a marker whose diversity is high enough to allow the reconstruction of gene genealogies with the least ambiguities and in regions where recombination does not interfere with the uniqueness of the trees. For this purpose, highly variable microsatellites represent valuable markers but they require intensive computing methods to take into account uncertainties in the trees arising from alleles that are identical by state and not by descent (homoplasies) [29, 30]. Adding a new sequence marker is therefore of interest for Y-chromosome population genetics in Cetartiodactyla. Moreover, the Bayesian estimate of mutation rate on each edge of both trees in Fig. 4, jointly computed with phylogenetic inference, shows high values for a marker of nuclear DNA: between 10-8 and 10-10 substitutions per site and per year in all Cetartiodactyla branches. This value is intermediate between those of mitochondrial d-loop and nuclear DNA in mammals [31, 32].

Functional perspectives in amelogenin evolution

We found two stop codons at amino acid positions 98 and 99 of exon 5 in all Y chromosome copies of amelogenin in the four studied cetacean species (positions 988–993 of sequence EMBL:AM744959). The Amel-Y gene product may therefore be truncated in these species or represent a pseudogene as already observed in species from most of the other eutherian clades [33]


The 460 bp insertion studied represents a single-event synapomorphy among most Cetartiodactyla. Together with the presence of other numerous indels informative at the order-level, it could help resolve the phylogenic discrepancies between hippopotamuses, pigs, camels and other Cetartiodactyla observed by many authors [79]. In addition, we demonstrate higher diversity within a single sequence than has yet been observed in multi-sequence assays [34]. This high diversity should allow the use of this sequence as the male counterpart of the mitochondrial control region. The applications would include inference of male-driven evolution in population genetics as applied to breeding management; domestication studies in archaeogenetics [35]; conservation biology (population history, sex-biased dispersal, admixture); or for testing sex-biased selection [28]. Amelogenin intron 4 amplification will also be an efficient tool for sexing Ruminantia and Cetacea. This will be useful for many fields of veterinary and forensic science (embryo technologies, in vitro fertilization, meat products). Finally, amelogenin amplification could also be a helpful tool for conservation biology through sampling of dead animals, faecal remains and biopsies of free-ranging animals like whales and dolphins. Amelogenin amplification in Cetartiodactyla therefore is a simple, single-step procedure with a wide range of applications.


Laboratory procedures

Biological material was isolated from soft tissues sampled from dead stranded cetaceans and extracted using a classical phenol-chloroform protocol [36]. We used heterologous primers, X5 (5'-GTGCTTACCCCTTTGAAGTG-3') and X6 (5'-CTTCCTCCCGCTTGGTCTTG-3'), designed from the amelogenin intron 4 and exon 5 of Homo sapiens X chromosome (GenBank:NC 000023, chrX:11221454–11228802) reference assembly Build 36.3, to amplify the homologous region in cetacean amelogenin. This region of Amel-X is 92% identical to Amel-Y.

We subsequently cloned and sequenced these PCR fragments and designed oligonucleotide primers specific to the Artiodactyla. They are anchored in exons 4 and 5 of Amel-X and Amel-Y, which allows complete amplification of the 4th intron (SC1: 5'-CAAGCATGCATTTCAATTCCC-3' and SC2: 5'-CTGCATGGGGAACATCGGAG-3'). Optimal PCR conditions were adjusted by using temperature (49–62°C) and MgCl2 (1–2.5 mM) gradients. Following this optimization step, the PCR amplifications were conducted in a reaction mix consisting of 477 mM KCl, 1 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgC12, 250 μM each dNTP, 2 pmol/μl of each primer, 3 units of Taq polymerase in a final volume of 25 μl. Cycling was conducted as follows: 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 45 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 70°C for 10 min. PCR products were run on 1.2% agarose gel ethidium bromide stained, alongside a 1 kbp ladder (New England Biolabs, County Road, MA). In order to validate the assay, the gender, if identified during examination of the stranded carcasses, was recorded (22 out of 38 samples). These amplifications were conducted in eight Cetacean species: 20 Striped dolphin (Stenella cœruleoalba), five Fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus), four Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), three Common dolphins (Delphinus delphis), three Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus), two Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus), one Minke whale (Balænoptera acutorostrata) and one Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus).

Of these, we sequenced striped dolphins (9 males and one female), fin whales (two males and two females), common dolphin (2 males), gray whale (one female) and Risso's dolphin (one female). Sequencing was performed on an ABI Prism sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with the dye terminator protocol directly for fragments amplified using the same (SC1-SC2) primer pair or after cloning in pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI) for fragments amplified using the X5-X6 pair. Each sample was sequenced from at least two independent amplifications for greater reliability.

Bioinformatic analyses

The obtained sequences were aligned using ClustalW, a clustering-based sequence alignment algorithm [37], with bottlenosed dolphin (GenBank:AY787743S2), cow (GenBank:AB091789–AB091790), pig (GenBank:AF328419 and AB091792), sheep (GenBank:AY604731) and human (GenBank:NT_011757 from 9098117 to 9098612 and GenBank:NC_000024 from 6796200 to 6796719) sequences. Striped dolphin haplotypes were named according to membership in one of the two Mediterranean populations inferred by population genetic data on mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA (data not shown). Stenella cœruleoalba YAn thus represents the nth haplotype from population 1 while Stenella cœruleoalba YBn represents the nth haplotype from population 2.

Phylogenic inference was performed using a Bayesian Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach, implemented in Mrbayes [38], that allows determining posterior probability of each node of the tree.

Given the high indel density in this region, data were divided into two partitions: a sequence matrix (1120 characters corresponding to nucleotides) and a binary character matrix (presence/absence of the indels). Gap coding was achieved using Modified Complex Indel Coding [39] in which parsimony-informative gap characters were scored from pairwise unambiguously aligned sequences. Hence, a total of 47 gap characters were included (summarized in Figure 5b). We used a General Time Reversible (GTR) model, allowing for a proportion of invariant sites for sequence partition, and a binary F81-like model with a variable ascertainment bias for the insert's absence/presence (state 0/state 1) for the binary partition. In this model, π0 and π1 are the stationary probabilities of the two states and π01 the rate of transition from state 1 to 0.

Patterns of genetic diversity were computed using DnaSP [40]. Specifically, the average number of substitutions was computed using Nei's equations 10.5, 10.6, 10.7 [41].



Many thanks go to H. Etchevers, N. Lambert and P. Monget for their much valuable comments on the manuscript as well as to P. Sudour and J. Butterworth.

We also wish to thank B. Jacobsen from the UAF Museum and F. Dhermain from the GECEM who kindly provided a significant part of the samples as well as A.-M. Gasc for technical help.

We are indebted to three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that significantly helped to improve manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

UMR 5174 UPS/CNRS EDB "Evolution et Diversité biologique", Bât 4R3b2, Université Paul Sabatier
Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, INSERM U563, CHU Purpan


  1. Lahn BT, Page DC: Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science. 1999, 286 (5441): 964-967. 10.1126/science.286.5441.964.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Lahn BT, Pearson NM, Jegalian K: The human Y chromosome, in the light of evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2 (3): 207-216. 10.1038/35056058.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Satchell PG, Anderton X, Ryu OH, Luan XH, Ortega AJ, Opamen R, Berman BJ, Witherspoon DE, Gutmann JL, Yamane A, et al: Conservation and variation in enamel protein distribution during vertebrate tooth development. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol). 2002, 294 (2): 91-106. 10.1002/jez.10148.View Article
  4. Delgado S, Girondot M, Sire JY: Molecular evolution of amelogenin in mammals. J Mol Evol. 2005, 60 (1): 12-30. 10.1007/s00239-003-0070-8.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Boisserie JR, Lihoreau F, Brunet M: The position of hippopotamidae within cetartiodactyla. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (5): 1537-1541. 10.1073/pnas.0409518102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  6. Gatesy J, O' Leary M: Deciphering whale origins with molecules and fossils. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001, 16 (10): 562-570. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02236-4.View Article
  7. Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N: Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interpersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (18): 10261-10266. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10261.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  8. Price SA, Bininda Emonds ORP, Gittleman AL: A complete phylogeny of the whales, dolphins and even-toed hoofed mammals (Cetartiodactyla). Biol Rev. 2005, 80 (3): 445-473. 10.1017/S1464793105006743.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Thewissen JG, Williams EM, Roe LJ, Hussain ST: Skeletons of terrestrial cetaceans and the relationship of whales to artiodactyls. Nature. 2001, 413 (6853): 277-281. 10.1038/35095005.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Leduc RG, Perrin WF, Dizon AE: Phylogenetic relationships among the delphinid cetaceans based on full cytochrome B sequences. Mar Mamm Sci. 1999, 15 (3): 619-648. 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00833.x.View Article
  11. Milinkovitch MC: Molecular phylogeny of cetaceans prompts revision of morphological transformations. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995, 10 (8): 328-334. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89120-X.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Hellborg L, Ellegren H: Low levels of nucleotide diversity in mammalian Y chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2004, 21 (1): 158-163. 10.1093/molbev/msh008.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Meadows JR, Hanotte O, Drogemuller C, Calvo J, Godfrey R, Coltman D, Maddox JF, Marzanov N, Kantanen J, Kijas JW: Globally dispersed Y chromosomal haplotypes in wild and domestic sheep. Anim Genet. 2006, 37 (5): 444-453. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01496.x.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Anderung C, Hellborg L, Seddon J, Hanotte O, Gotherstrom A: Investigation of X- and Y-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms in taurine (Bos taurus) and indicine (Bos indicus) cattle. Anim Genet. 2007, 38 (6): 595-600.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Edwards CJ, Gaillard C, Bradley DG, MacHugh DE: Y-specific microsatellite polymorphisms in a range of bovid species. Anim Genet. 2000, 31 (2): 127-130. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00602.x.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Brinkmann B: Is the amelogenin sex test valid?. Int J Legal Med. 2002, 116 (2): 63-10.1007/s00414-001-0263-x.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Bryja J, Konečný A: Fast sex identification in wild mammals using PCR amplification of the Sry gene. Folia Zool. 2003, 52 (3): 269-274. [http://​www.​ivb.​cz/​folia/​52/​3/​269-274.​pdf]
  18. Shaw CN, Wilson PJ, White BN: A reliable molecular method of gender determination for mammals. J Mammal. 2003, 84 (1): 123-128. 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0123:ARMMOG>2.0.CO;2.View Article
  19. Pomp D, Good BA, Geisert RD, Corbin CJ, Conley AJ: Sex identification in mammals with polymerase chain reaction and its use to examine sex effects on diameter of day-10 or -11 pig embryos. J Anim Sci. 1995, 73 (5): 1408-1415.PubMed
  20. Ennis S, Gallagher TF: A PCR-based sex-determination assay in cattle based on the bovine amelogenin locus. Anim Genet. 1994, 25 (6): 425-427.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Pfeiffer I, Brenig B: X- and Y-chromosome specific variants of the amelogenin gene allow sex determination in sheep (Ovis aries) and European red deer (Cervus elaphus). BMC Genet. 2005, 6 (1): 16-10.1186/1471-2156-6-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  22. Weikard R, Pitra C, Kuhn C: Amelogenin cross-amplification in the family Bovidae and its application for sex determination. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73 (10): 1333-1337. 10.1002/mrd.20554.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Robertson BC, Gemmell NJ: PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: Wrong answers from an accurate methodology?. Conserv Genet. 2006, 7 (2): 267-271. 10.1007/s10592-005-9105-6.View Article
  24. Findlay I, Quirke P: Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction: Part I. A new method allowing genetic diagnosis and DNA fingerprinting of single cells. Hum Reprod Update. 1996, 2 (2): 137-152. 10.1093/humupd/2.2.137.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Walsh PS, Erlich HA, Higuchi R: Preferential PCR amplification of alleles: mechanisms and solutions. PCR Methods Appl. 1992, 1 (4): 241-250.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Findlay I, Ray P, Quirke P, Rutherford A, Lilford R: Allelic drop-out and preferential amplification in single cells and human blastomeres: implications for preimplantation diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis. Hum Reprod. 1995, 10 (6): 1609-1618.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Bininda-Emonds OR, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RD, Beck RM, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A: The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature. 2007, 446 (7135): 507-512. 10.1038/nature05634.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Petit E, Balloux F, Excoffier L: Mammalian population genetics: why not Y?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002, 17 (1): 28-33. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02356-4.View Article
  29. Beerli P, Felsenstein J: Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (8): 4563-4568. 10.1073/pnas.081068098.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  30. Wilson IJ, Balding DJ: Genealogical inference from microsatellite data. Genetics. 1998, 150 (1): 499-510.PubMed CentralPubMed
  31. Ayala FJ: Vagaries of the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (15): 7776-7783. 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7776.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  32. Moritz C, Dowling TE, Brown WM: Evolution of Animal Mitochondrial DNA: Relevance for Population Biology and Systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1987, 18: 269-292. 10.1146/ Article
  33. Sire JY, Delgado S, Fromentin D, Girondot M: Amelogenin: lessons from evolution. Arch Oral Biol. 2005, 50 (2): 205-212. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.09.004.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Hatch LT, Dopman EB, Harrison RG: Phylogenetic relationships among the baleen whales based on maternally and paternally inherited characters. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006, 41 (1): 12-27. 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.023.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Zeder MA, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, Bradley DG: Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends Genet. 2006, 22 (3): 139-155. 10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007.View ArticlePubMed
  36. Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3
  37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (24): 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  38. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19 (12): 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.View ArticlePubMed
  39. Müller K: Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006, 38 (3): 667-676. 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.011.View ArticlePubMed
  40. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R: DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19 (18): 2496-2497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359.View ArticlePubMed
  41. Nei M: Molecular evolutionary genetics. 1987, United States: Columbia University Press, New York, NY


© Macé and Crouau-Roy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.