Open Access

Genotypic background of the recipient plant is crucial for conferring RB gene mediated late blight resistance in potato

  • Rajesh K. Shandil1,
  • Swarup K. Chakrabarti1Email author,
  • Bir Pal Singh1,
  • Sanjeev Sharma1,
  • S. Sundaresha1,
  • Surinder K. Kaushik2,
  • Arvind K. Bhatt3 and
  • Nitya Nand Sharma4
BMC GeneticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:22

DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0490-x

Received: 2 September 2016

Accepted: 3 March 2017

Published: 9 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Late blight, caused by oomycetes pathogen Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary, is the most devastating potato disease in the world. RB gene from Solanum bulbocastanum has been shown to impart broad spectrum resistance against P. infestans races. In this study Katahdin transgenic event SP951 was used as male parent to cross with the popular Indian potato cultivars viz., Kufri Bahar (KB) and Kufri Jyoti (KJ) to enhance the late blight resistance.

Results

Populations of 271 F1seedlings from the crosses KB × SP951 (87) and KJ × SP951 (184) were screened for inheritance of RB transgene through PCR and bioassay. Disease response based on AUDPC of different hybrid lines varied from immunity to complete susceptibility. High degree of resistance (<25% infection) was observed in KJ × SP951 derived seedlings (85.2%), whereas level of resistance in KB × SP951 (36.4% infection) derived seedlings was of low order.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable genetic materials for development of potentially durable late blight resistant potato varieties. Besides, it also corroborates the fact that efficacy of R gene is not solely dependent on its presence in the variety but largely depends on the genetic background of the recipient genotype.

Keywords

RB gene Phytophthora infestans Molecular breeding Transgenic potato

Background

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important horticultural food crop which has the potential to meet food demand of the fast growing human population across the world, including India. Late blight caused by the oomycetes pathogen Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary is the most devastating disease worldwide causing € 12 billion crop losses annually [1]. In India, late blight is more serious in temperate highlands and plateau region than in the Indo-Gangetic plains and average crop losses to the tune of 15% have been estimated which amounts to 6.7 million metric tonnes of potatoes. Integrated disease management strategy consisting of disease forecasting, fungicide spray schedules and deployment of resistant varieties has been employed to manage this disease [2].

Major R genes mainly derived from Solanum demissum have been exploited world over including India, to develop late blight resistant cultivars through classical breeding. The resistance conferred by these R genes, however, was short lived due to development of matching virulences of P. infestans in due course of time [3]. A wild diploid potato species S. bulbocastanum (2n = 2 × = 24) from Mexico and Guatemala, possessing very high degree of resistance to late blight controlled by R genes is an exception. Classical breeding approach to transfer resistance from this species to cultivated potato is not possible because of differences in ploidy and Endosperm Balance Number [4]. To overcome this problem, the R gene responsible for broad-spectrum resistance in S. bulbocastanum was cloned by two independent groups in USA (RB, [5]) and The Netherlands (Rpi-blb1, [6]). The cloning of RB gene opened up the possibility of using recombinant DNA technology to transfer the gene to commercially important susceptible potato varieties to diversify and strengthen late blight resistance in cultivated potatoes [7].

The RB gene isolated from S. bulbocastanum when transferred into Katahdin using Agrobacterium tumefaciens [5] imparted broad spectrum resistance to known races of P. infestans in selected transgenic events both in the greenhouse and in field experiments [7, 8]. In the present study, the RB-transgenic Katahdin event SP951 (obtained from University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA under USAID-ABSP II)was used as male parent in crosses with two popular Indian cultivars viz. Kufri Bahar (KB) and Kufri Jyoti (KJ) which occupy almost 400,000 hectares of potato area in India (CIP Social Science Working Paper 2005–06, page number 17). Kufri Jyoti is a day-neutral, widely adapted cultivar that was resistant to late blight and is grown throughout India including hills, plains and the plateau. Kufri Bahar on the other hand is susceptible to late blight but is the most preferred cultivar in west-central plains of India occupying about 60% area. In this study, introgression of RB gene in Indian popular potato cultivars was demonstrated for the enhancement of late blight resistance and generation of valuable genetic material for resistance breeding programme. It was also demonstrated that genotypes with variable level of late blight resistance can be developed by crossing a specific RB-transgenic event with well adapted Indian potato cultivars.

Methods

Plant material

The cultivar Katahdin and its transgenic event SP951 (RB-transgenic) used for introgression breeding was provided by University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA under USAID-ABSP II project (Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project II). The potato cultivars Kufri Bahar and Kufri Jyoti were obtained from the Division of Seed Technology, CPRI, Shimla. The population of Kufri Jyoti × SP951 (184 F1 seedlings) and Kufri Bahar × SP951 (87 F1 seedlings) found positive for RB gene integration, were further evaluated for late blight resistance. All the plant materials including hybrid lines were clonally propagated inside transgenic containment facility, at ICAR-CPRI, Shimla. Kufri Bahar, Kufri Jyoti, Katahdin transgenic event SP951 (RB-transgenic line that contains one copy of the RB gene, [9]), and Katahdin (untransformed) were used as controls.

Molecular analysis of F1 seedlings

Presence of RB gene in the plant samples was confirmed by amplification of both N- and C-terminal regions as well as internal region of the RB gene sequence using three different primer pairs. The N-terminal and C-terminal portions of the gene were amplified by using the primer pairs 1–5/3–5 and cf1/cr1, respectively [8]. The allele specific primers MAMA2/INDEL-r were used to amplify the internal region of the RB gene [10]. The PCR reaction condition and temperature regimes as described by the respective authors were used for amplification. The RP2-f1/r5 primer pairs (collectively referred to as “RP2 primers”) were used to amplify the RNA Polymerase II subunit 2 as internal check for all the samples [11].

DNA extraction and PCR reactions

Genomic DNA was isolated from leaves of young shoots using GenElute™ Plant Genomic DNA Mini Prep Kit (Sigma Aldrich). Template DNA from each young plant of 271 F1seedlings was extracted for PCR confirmation of RB gene. Multiplex PCR reaction (20 μL) was performed using 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Bangalore GeNei™, India), 100 ng of genomic DNA, 1X PCR Buffer (MgCl2 free), 2 mM MgCl2, 160 μM dNTP, 0.50 μM of each MAMA primers (MAMAF: CATCTTGAGAGAGTGAAGAATGATCT and MAMAR: CTAGTGCGCAACACAATTGAA) and 0.10 μM of each RP2 primers (RP2F: TCGTGGATTTTTCCGATCTC and RP2R: ATCTCGCTCCATCTCTCCAA) with the following amplification conditions: 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles comprising of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min;and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The RB gene insert was also analyzed using N-terminal and C-terminal primers. PCR reaction (20 μL) was performed using 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Bangalore GeNeiTM, India), 100 ng of genomic DNA, 1X PCR Buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 160 μM dNTP, 0.20 μM of each N-terminal primers (RBNF: CTCATTTTACCCCTACAA and RBNR: GCGTTTTGGACCCTTTTA) and 0.20 μM of each C-terminal primers (RBCF: TAAGCATGAGTTGGAATAACT and RBCR: GCCAGTCTTCTCCTATTCCCT) with amplification conditions as mentioned above. After completion of PCR, reaction products were loaded on 1% of agarose gel (containing ethidium bromide 0.5 μg/mL) prepared in 1 X TAE buffer, and electrophoresed at 100 V for 2 h. Gel documentation was performed under UV light using a Fluor-STMMultiImager (BIO-RAD).

Southern analysis

Selected F1 lines that were PCR positive and showed late blight resistance were analyzed for the transgene integration. For this, 15 μg of genomic DNA was digested with HindIII (New England Biolab) which cut once in the T-DNA. The digested DNA samples were electrophoressed on a 0.8% agarose gel for 16 h. The separated fragments were transferred onto a nylon membrane (Amersham, GE Healthcare, USA) and hybridization was performed using nptII gene fragment as the hybridized probes. DNA fragments were labelled with α[32P]- dCTP using a random primer DNA labelling kit (Amersham, GE Healthcare, USA). Hybridization was performed at 65 °C for 18 h. The filter was washed at room temperature with 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS, followed by 1× SSC and 0.1% SDS, for 10 min each [12] and the image analysed using a phosphorimager (BioRad, USA).

Late blight disease analysis of F1 seedlings

Seedlings of Kufri Bahar x SP951 (55) and Kufri Jyoti x SP951(88) positive for RB gene, were evaluated for foliar blight resistance. Three tubers of each clone were planted in earthen pots under transgenic containment facility. The pots were shifted to green house at 40 days after planting (DAP) and were allowed to acclimatize for six days. Thereafter, the plants were shifted to late blight screening chamber where temperature (18 ± 1 °C) and relative humidity (≥90%) were maintained. P. infestans isolate belonging to A2 mating type and having all virulence genes was mass cultured on tuber slices of cv. Kufri Chandramukhi. The sporangia were washed from the tuber surface in sterilized distilled water and diluted to 40,000 sporangia/ml. The sporangial suspension was incubated at 4 °C for 30 min for release of zoospores. Plants were sprayed till run off with zoospore suspension using a hand atomizer.

Disease severity was recorded at different time intervals (2, 6 & 10 days) after inoculation [13] i.e. 48, 52, 56 days after planting and populations of KB × SP951 and KJ × SP951 were grouped based on late blight resistance score (Table 1). Plants with score of > 7.0 (<25% infection) were scored as resistant whereas those with score of <7.0 (>25% infection) were scored as susceptible. Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) for some of the lines showing variation in degree of late blight resistance was also calculated [14].
Table 1

Scoring of late blight resistance based on the percentage of infected leaf tissue

Late Blight Infection (%)

>90

81–90

71–80

61–70

41–60

26–40

11–25

<10

0

Score

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Results

Molecular analysis of F1seedlings

When Kufri Bahar and Kufri Jyoti cultivars of potato were crossed with Katahdin transgenic event SP951 (RB-transgenic line), 271 F1seedlings (87 of KB× SP951 and 184 of KJ × SP951) were obtained and were tested for RB gene integration. Stability and inheritance of RB gene in F1 seedlings were confirmed by PCR amplification that revealed a 712 bp fragment in 55 F1 seedlings of KB × SP951and 88 F1 seedlings of KJ × SP951 (Fig. 1) with mismatch amplification for mutation analysis (MAMA) primer. It showed that the RB gene segregated in the ratio of ~1:0.89 in the F1 which is expected in this experiment. Similarly, PCR amplification with N- and C-terminal region specific primers yielded fragment size of 619 bp (Fig. 2) and 840 bp (Fig. 2), respectively which confirmed the stability and inheritance of the transgene.
Fig. 1

Multiplex PCR of F1seedlingsof the cross Kufri Jyoti x SP951 and Kufri Bahar x SP951using MAMA and RP2 primers

Fig. 2

PCR confirmation of RB gene integration in F1seedlings using N-terminal (619 bp fragment size) and C-terminal (840 bp fragment size) primers

Southern analysis

The integration of the transgene was confirmed by Southern hybridization in the parental line SP951 as well as in the selected F1 genotypes (Fig. 3). The result showed that the transgene copy number was the same (single copy) in the parental transgenic Katahdin SP951 as well as in the progeny lines. This confirmed stable integration of the transgene in the genome of the RB-transgenic Katahdin line SP951 and segregation of the inserted locus in the progeny of crosses involving adapted Indian potato cultivars as female parent and SP951 as male parent.
Fig. 3

Copy number analysis of parental line SP951 and F1 hybrid lines

Evaluation for foliar blight resistance

RB-positive F1seedlings were further tested for their efficacy in terms of resistance to foliar blight under P. infestans inoculation. The terminal disease severity was 45% (10 DAI)in transgenic Katahdin event SP951 as against 100% in the control cultivars thereby signifying the effectiveness of RB gene in providing resistance to late blight. The degree of late blight resistance in F1 progenies varied from immunity to complete susceptibility (Fig. 4). The distribution of the progeny (88 of KJ × SP951 clones)for late blight disease resistance scores are as follows: 1.1% (score 4), 3.4% (score 5), 10.2% (score 6), 15.9% (score 7), 65.9% (score 8) and 3.4% (score 9). All these clones had late bight infection <70% thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of RB gene in imparting resistance. Few seedlings like KJ/SP951-96, KJ/SP951-97 and KJ/SP951-104 showed very high degree of resistance (score 9, Fig. 4). Contrary to this, 12.7, 7.3, 12.7, 5.5, 16.4, 9.1, 20.0 and 16.4% seedlings of KB x SP951 were scored 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, respectively. In total 63.6% seedlings of the cross combination were susceptible (>25% infection) to late blight (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Distribution of RB positive population of Kufri Jyoti × SP951 and Kufri Bahar × SP951 (F1 seedlings) in the late blight resistance scale (Table 1) based on terminal disease severity at 10 DAI (days after inoculation)

Late blight infection in KJ/SP951-4 at 52 DAP was 15% only which almost ceased thereafter. A very high level of late blight resistance was recorded in KJ/SP951-96, KJ/SP951-97, KJ/SP951-104, KJ/SP951-8, KJ/SP951-16 and KJ/SP951-19seedlings (Fig. 5). Whereas in KJ/SP951-4, KJ/SP951-18, KJ/SP951-63, KJ/SP951-15, and KJ/SP951-54 seedlings it was 20 to 50% at 52 DAP, the disease progression almost ceased during 52–57 DAP. On the other hand, very few seedlings of the cross KB × SP951 showed inhibitory effect on late blight progression (Fig. 5). In KB/SP951-4 (50% at 52 DAP), KB/SP951-13 (60% at 52 DAP) and KB/SP951-3 (70% at 52 DAP), late blight progression almost ceased even after very high infection percentage (50–70%) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Progression of late blight infection in terms of Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) in Kufri Jyoti x SP951 and Kufri Bahar x SP951seedlings. The lines were grouped in the scale 1–9(DAP: Days after planting)

Based on AUDPC, KB x SP951 seedlings were found more susceptible than those derived from KJ x SP951. Lowest AUDPC values (0–2) were recorded for 36 seedlings of KJ × SP951 whereas only one hybrid of KB × SP951 fell in this category. AUDPC values for Kufri Jyoti seedlings were lower (139 out of 184 hybrid lines showing AUDPC values < 1) than Kufri Bahar seedlings (10 out of 87 hybrid lines showing AUDPC values < 1) indicating higher inherent late blight resistance in Kufri Jyoti seedlings. All the KJ × SP951 seedlings had better resistance than the maternal parent Kufri Jyoti whereas seventy six (out of 184 hybrid lines)were better than the paternal parent SP951 in terms of late blight resistance. This clearly indicates effectiveness of RB gene in inhibiting progression of late blight infection.

Discussion

Many tuber-bearing wild Solanum species are known to possess high degree of resistance to late blight. The RB/Rpi-blb1 gene cloned from the S. bulbocastanum, when integrated into four popular potato cultivars susceptible to late blight, viz. Katahdin, Superior, Dark Red Norland, and Russet Burbank, conferred broad-spectrum late blight resistance consistently with little or no impact on total yield [5, 8]. The introgression of late blight resistance from wild Solanum species into currently cultivated potato through classical breeding is a long-term process. For instance, it took 46 years of breeding efforts to develop two varieties (Bionic and Toluca) from the first bridge cross between S. acaule (4x) × S. bulbocastanum (2x) [1]. On the other hand, development of stable transgenic potato plants with new R gene(s) derived from another potato species is relatively simple and has only a minor impact on the genetics of the recipient cultivated variety [8]. However, bio-efficacy of directly regenerated transgenic plants may differ because of differences in sites of gene integration, copy number variation of the inserted gene as well as genetic background of the recipient genotype(s). Therefore, the present attempt was made to develop RB-transgenic potato varieties by crossing well adapted indigenous potato cultivar(s) with well-characterized RB transgenic event of another exotic potato variety through conventional breeding.

A large variation in the level of late blight resistance in the F1population derived from KJ × SP951 and KB × SP951 was recorded. F1 seedlings derived from KJ × SP951 showed better resistance compared to those derived from KB × SP951. High throughput gene expression analysis of the selected F1 seedlings showed conflicting results with respect to level of expression of R and R-like genes vis-à-vis late blight resistance level (unpublished data). It, therefore, indicated that expression level of RB gene alone in particular F1 genotype was unable to explain its observed level of late blight resistance. Instead, it may be dependent on genotypic background, specifically combinations of pathogenesis related (PR) gene alleles with the RB allele in particular F1genotype derived from the introgression cross. Experiments to find out the best combination of RB gene with other gene(s) for obtaining best level of late blight resistance is underway in our laboratory. The correlation between the transcript abundance of RB gene and late blight resistance has been established recently [9, 15] in different transgenic events of the same variety. However, it may not be sufficient to explain the observed difference in the level of late blight resistance in the F1 progeny of a particular transgenic event as indicated in our study. Similarly, the Sgt1 gene has been reported essential for the RB-mediated late blight resistance and Sgt1- silenced transgenic lines of potato failed to exhibit RB- mediated late blight resistance [16]. In some instances, pathogen induced up-regulation of R genes has also been noted previously in other pathosystems [1720].

The Indian cultivar Kufri Jyoti was bred as a late blight resistant cultivar in 1968 using S. demissum as resistant parent. It possesses three major R genes (R3, R4, R7) but resistance in this cultivar was compromised due to development of matching virulences during 1980s that knocked down all the three R genes. However, the downstream signal transduction cascade as well as PR proteins in Kufri Jyoti was presumably very effective since it showed high level of resistance to late blight before its breakdown due to evolution of matching races in the pathogen. It was evident from the high level of resistance observed in majority of F1 progeny derived from Kufri Jyoti where an effective R gene (RB) was introduced. Although, the stability and inheritance of the RB gene was confirmed through Southern analysis and late blight assay, variation in the resistance level of the F1 progeny having the RB gene was probably due to shuffling of other downstream genes during meiotic recombination. On the contrary, most of the progeny derived from the cross with the susceptible cultivar Kufri Bahar showed inferior level of resistance even after having RB gene, probably because of in-effective combination of downstream genes. This indicates that allelic combination of downstream genes encoding signal transduction cascades as well as pathogenesis related proteins are very important for getting desired level of resistance in a particular genotype. Besides, several other polygenic components may be responsible for the observed variation in late blight severity among the F1seedlings. For example, theSgt1 gene has been reported essential for the RB-mediated late blight resistance and this may be another reason for the observed variation in R gene-mediated plant defense responses [16]. An understanding of the genetic relationship within potato hybrid lines is important to establish a broad genetic base for breeding purposes [21]. Potato germplasm with reported late blight resistance should be introgressed with RB for stronger and more durable resistance.

The results corroborate the hypothesis that RB is an signal receptor protein that triggers a cache of defence proteins to induce localized hypersensitive response thereby halting the pathogenesis at the site of invasion [22]. Level of resistance depends on the combination of effective alleles of the defence proteins present in a particular genotypic background. Our findings support the above hypothesis. The cessation of late blight progression after 40–70% infection in the KB × SP951 and KJ × SP951 population, supports the results obtained for S. bulbocastanum clone PT29 derived somatic hybrids and a number of backcrossed progenies where the pathogen sometimes sporulated and the disease phenotype was general suppression but not elimination of symptom development [17, 23]. Promising lines were selected on the basis of per cent infection on the last day (57 day after planting, DAP) of scoring as well as AUDPC. Area under the disease progress curve is a measure of disease development over the whole course of the epidemic. The lines showing 40% or less late blight infection at 57 DAP and AUDPC values below that of control varieties Kufri Bahar and Kufri Jyoti were selected for further evaluation.

Therefore, RB transgene can be used effectively to reduce foliar late blight infection in cultivated potatoes. This enhanced resistance over the generation may be ascribed to the pooling of R gene activation or re-shuffling of R genes in the background of Kufri Jyoti that imparts resistance against Phytophthora infestans. This RB positive F1 genotypes showing different levels of late blight resistance will be useful for identifying promising downstream genes to build the future molecular breeding activities.

Conclusions

The study confirms that the classical R gene (RB) with NBS-LRR-CC motif from the wild potato species Solanum bulbocastanum confers broad spectrum resistance to potato late blight. It was also established that the RB transgene could be transferred to the F1 progeny by crossing non-transgenic locally adapted cultivar with the transgenic event of the cultivar Katahdin. In addition this study demonstrated that the level of late blight resistance varied greatly within the F1 progeny, i.e. a few F1 genotype possessing the RB transgene showed immunity to late blight while some others were completely susceptible even after possessing the RB transgene. The differential late blight response could not be explained by the variation in level of RB gene expression in the F1 progeny. This study, therefore, clearly indicated that efficacy of R gene is not solely dependent on its presence in the particular genotype but largely depends on the genetic background of the recipient genotype. It will be interesting to investigate role of other downstream genes in potato for achieving satisfactory level of resistance through the classical R gene.

Abbreviations

AUDPC: 

Area under the disease progress curve

DAP: 

Days after planting

KB/SP951: 

Lines obtained from Kufri Bahar crossed with SP951

KJ/SP951: 

Lines obtained from Kufri Jyoti crossed with SP951

MAMA: 

Mismatch amplification mutation assay

PR: 

Pathogenesis related

RB: 

R gene from Solanum bulbocastanum

SGT: 

Suppressor of G2 allele of S-phase Kinase Associated Protein 1 (SKP1) gene

SP951: 

RB transgenic Katahdin event (Male parent)

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India and Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project II, Cornell University, USA.

Availability of data and materials

The plant materials and other biological materials used and generated under this study are available at ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, India. Experimental data on late blight evaluation and molecular analysis of RB-transgenic materials are available with the corresponding author as digital data as well as in laboratory note book.

Authors’ contributions

RKS conducted all the experiments and collected data; SKC, BPS and AKB contributed in planning of experiments, data collection and analysis and interpretation of result; SKK contributed in making crosses and progeny development, SKC and RKS contributed in preparation of manuscript; SSh contributed in late blight screening; SSu and NNS contributed in molecular analysis of experimental materials. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The RB-transgenic event SP951 of the potato cultivar Katahdin was imported from Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA under the import permit No. 96/2005 and 116/2005 (IQ No. 156/05) dated 18.02.2005 of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research signed a Material Transfer Agreement (MTA) with the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) for utilizing the RB gene in development of late blight resistant variety. The efficacy trial of the material was done under confined condition as per the approval given by the Review Committee on Genetic Modification (RCGM), Department of Biotechnology, Government of India vide letter number BT/BS/11/22/97-PID dated 12.06.2006 and BT/BS/11/22/97-PID dated 20.11.2009. The study did not involve human participants, human data or human tissue.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute
(2)
Division of Germplasm Evaluation, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources
(3)
Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University
(4)
Premas BiotechPvt. Ltd

References

  1. Haverkort AJ, Struik PC, Visser RGF, Jacobsen E. Applied biotechnology to combat late blight in potato caused by Phytophthora infestans. Potato Res. 2009;52:249–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Singh BP, Roy S, Bhattacharyya SK, Shekhawat GS. Schedule of metalaxyl-based fungicide and development of fungicide resistant strains.In: GS Shekhawat, SM Paul Khurana, SK Pandey, VK Chandla, editors. Potato, Present and Future. Shimla: Indian Potato Association, Central Potato Research Institute; 1994. pp. 179-183.
  3. Zhu SX, Vossen JH, Bergervoet M, Nijenhuis M, Kodde L, Kessel GJT, Vleeshouwers VGAA, Visser RGF, Jacobsen E. An updated conventional and a novel GM potato late blight R gene differential set for virulence monitoring of Phytophthora infestans. Euphytica. 2015;202(2):219–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnston SA, denNijs TPM, Peloquin SJ, Hannemann Jr RE. The significance of genetic balance to endosperm developmentin interspecific crosses. Theor App Genet. 1980;57:5–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Song JQ, Bradeen JM, Naess SK, Raasch JA, Wielgus SM, Haberlach GT, Liu J, Kuang HH, Austin-Phillips S, Buell CR, Helgeson JP, Jiang JM. Gene RB cloned from Solanum bulbocastanum confers broad spectrum resistance to potato late blight. Proc NAS, USA. 2003;100:9128–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Van der Vossen E, Sikkema A, Hekkert BL, Gros J, Stevens P, Muskens M, Wouters D, Pereira A, Stiekema W, Allefs S. An ancient R gene from the wild potato species Solanum bulbocastanum confers broad-spectrum resistance to Phytophthora infestans in cultivated potato and tomato. Plant J. 2003;36:867–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuhl JC, Zarka K, Coombs J, Kirk WW, Douches DS. Late blight resistance of RB transgenic potato lines. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2007;132:783–9.Google Scholar
  8. Halterman DA, Kramer LC, Wielgus S, Jiang J. Performance of transgenic potato containing the late blight resistance gene RB. Plant Dis. 2008;92:339–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kramer LC, Choudoir MJ, Wielgus SM, Bhaskar PB, Jiang J. Correlation between transcript abundance of the RB gene and the level of the RB-mediated late blight resistance in potato. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009;22:447–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Millett BP, Bradeen JM. Development of allele-specific PCR and RT-PCR assays for clustered resistance genes using a potato late blight resistance transgene as a model. Theor App Genet. 2007;114:501–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Helgeson JP, Pohlman JD, Austin S, Haberlach GT, Wielgus SM, Ronis D, Zambolim L, Tooley P, McGrath JM, James RV, Stevenson WR. Somatic hybrids between Solanumbulbocastanum and potato; a new source of resistance to late blight. Theor App Genet. 1998;96:738–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. USA.: Cold Spring Harbour Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Malcolmson JF. Assesement of field resistance to blight (Phytophthora infestans) in potatoes. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1976;67(2):321–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shaner G, Finney RE. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology. 1977;67:1051–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradeen JM, Iorizzo M, Mollov DS, Raasch J, Kramer LC, Millett BP, Austin-Phillips S, Jiming Jiang J, Carputo D. Higher copy numbers of the potato RB transgene correspond to enhanced transcript and late blight resistance levels. Mol Plant-Microbe Inter. 2009;22:437–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhaskar PB, Raasch JA, Kramer LC, Neumann P, Wielgus SM, Austin-Phillips S, Jiang JM. Sgt1, but not Rar1, is essential for the RB-mediated broad-spectrum resistance to potato late blight. BMC Plant Bio. 2008;8:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu K, Yang B, Tian D, Wu L, Wang D, Sreekala C, Yang F, Chu Z, Wang GL, White FF, Yin Z. R gene expression induced by a type-III effector triggers disease resistance in rice. Nature. 2005;435:1122–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Halterman D, Wei F, Wise RP. Powdery mildew-induced Mla mRNAs are alternatively spliced and contain multiple upstream open reading frames. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:558–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy M, Edelbaum O, Sela I. Tobacco mosaic virus regulates the expression of its own resistance gene N. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:2392–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Thurau T, Kifle S, Jung C, Cai D. The promoter of the nematode resistance gene Hs1pro-1 activates a nematode-responsive and feeding site-specific gene expression in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;52:643–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bisognin DA, Douches DS. Genetic diversity in diploid and tetraploid late blight resistant potato germplasm. Hortic Sci. 2002;37:178–83.Google Scholar
  22. Chen Y, Liu Z, Halterman DA. Molecular determinants of resistance activation and suppression by Phytophthora infestans effector IPI-O. PLoS Patho. 2012;8(3):e1002595.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Naess SK, Bradeen JM, Wielgus SM, Haberlach GT, McGrath JM, Helgeson JP. Analysis of the introgression of Solanum bulbocastanum DNA into potato breeding lines. Mol Genet Genom. 2001;265:694–704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement