- Research article
- Open Access
Population genetics of the understory fishtail palm Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti in Belize: high genetic connectivity with local differentiation
© Cibrián-Jaramillo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 4 February 2009
- Accepted: 9 October 2009
- Published: 9 October 2009
Developing a greater understanding of population genetic structure in lowland tropical plant species is highly relevant to our knowledge of increasingly fragmented forests and to the conservation of threatened species. Specific studies are particularly needed for taxa whose population dynamics are further impacted by human harvesting practices. One such case is the fishtail or xaté palm (Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti) of Central America, whose wild-collected leaves are becoming progressively more important to the global ornamental industry. We use microsatellite markers to describe the population genetics of this species in Belize and test the effects of climate change and deforestation on its recent and historical effective population size.
We found high levels of inbreeding coupled with moderate or high allelic diversity within populations. Overall high gene flow was observed, with a north and south gradient and ongoing differentiation at smaller spatial scales. Immigration rates among populations were more difficult to discern, with minimal evidence for isolation by distance. We infer a tenfold reduction in effective population size ca. 10,000 years ago, but fail to detect changes attributable to Mayan or contemporary deforestation.
Populations of C. ernesti-augusti are genetically heterogeneous demes at a local spatial scale, but are widely connected at a regional level in Belize. We suggest that the inferred patterns in population genetic structure are the result of the colonization of this species into Belize following expansion of humid forests in combination with demographic and mating patterns. Within populations, we hypothesize that low aggregated population density over large areas, short distance pollen dispersal via thrips, low adult survival, and low fruiting combined with early flowering may contribute towards local inbreeding via genetic drift. Relatively high levels of regional connectivity are likely the result of animal-mediated long-distance seed dispersal. The greatest present threat to the species is the potential onset of inbreeding depression as the result of increased human harvesting activities. Future genetic studies in understory palms should focus on both fine-scale and landscape-level genetic structure.
- Gene Flow
- Effective Population Size
- Genetic Cluster
- Immigration Rate
- High Gene Flow
In plants, tools from molecular ecology and population genetics have been used to characterize genetic patterns that result from geographic and biological barriers to pollen and seed dispersal, and to investigate their significance in the evolutionary history of a species [1–5]. Despite critical insights into many plant species, most studies have focused on temperate trees, followed by tropical canopy trees and temperate herbs. In contrast, palms (Arecaceae) with 2,522 species and iconic significance throughout the tropics , have been largely overlooked in this context.
Within palms, understory species are the least represented. Only a handful of studies have focused on the basic population genetics of this group [7–11]. Understory palms are one of the most ecologically and economically important plant groups throughout tropical forests, where human-induced landscape changes occur at an increasing rate [12, 13]. Hamrick  suggested that most trees have enough intrinsic genetic variation and mechanisms to maintain propagule movement in order to be resilient to habitat changes. While this might be the case for most forest canopy species , evidence is less clear for understory taxa, which differ from canopy species in biological and demographic factors. For instance, understory palms have small life forms, smaller seeds than canopy palms, striking phenotypic plasticity, generally narrow distributions along microenvironments, and most notably, variation in population densities across geographic areas [16–21]. They are sensitive to processes that occur at local spatial scales, such as changes in elevation or light within a single mountain slope [22–25]. All of these factors are important determinants of the genetic variation and structure within and among plant populations [1, 2, 26]. It remains unclear whether theoretical expectations of genetic erosion indeed occur after forest fragmentation in understory palms, or whether other factors, such as changes in demography due to overharvesting or localized ecological degradation, may be more important for the long-term survival of these important species .
In recent years, C. ernesti-augusti has gained economic importance as an important Non-Timber Forest Product (NTFP) in Central America [35–37]. The leaves of this species, known as xaté or fishtail palm, are harvested and exported into the international floral industry, generating increasingly important revenue . The combination of over-harvesting and habitat loss has led to populations in this region becoming progressively more vulnerable [38, 39].
Our objectives are to test specific hypotheses about the evolutionary history of C. ernesti-augusti and to establish a genetic baseline for its management and conservation. We measure the levels of genetic variation and genetic structure of 138 individuals of C. ernesti-augusti throughout Belize in eight localities, using nine nuclear microsatellites. We describe genetic patterns within and among populations and test whether two major landscape events have shaped the current population structure of C. ernesti-augusti in Belize. These events are major climatic, vegetation and soil changes during the early Holocene (ca. 10,000 BP), and the impact of Mayan and recent landscape fragmentation, including aridification during Mayan decline (ca. 1,000 BP). We used traditional summary statistics and the theory of the coalescent as proxies for the historical effects on genetic structure of C. ernesti-augusti in Belize. Bayesian statistics were used to yield an a posteriori partitioning of the contemporary genetic variation (i.e. within the last two generations), and to test the assumed subdivision caused by deforestation within the northern and southern regions.
This study is one of few addressing the genetic structure of wild populations of ecologically and economically important understory palms, and the first to use highly variable molecular markers in this genus. We discuss the distribution of genetic variation within and among populations of Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti, their interplay with putative historical and contemporary geographic events, and their implications for conservation.
High allelic richness and high inbreeding
Site Area (Ha)/conservation status1/connectivity2/harvested3
El Pilar (16)
103,907/core/restricted to soil type + narrow valleys/no
19,000/core/restricted to one small site/no
Pueblo Viejo (18)
Dating and quantifying changes in effective population size
Genetic connectivity across Belize
Using the eight sampling sites as populations, the estimate of genetic structure θST indicated that a moderate 8.5% (CI95% 0.05858-0.11663) of the variation resides among localities. According to AMOVA, most of the variation is found within individuals, and among individuals within a single population, rather than among populations within each region (see Additional file 1). Fixation indices suggest that there are high levels of inbreeding, with the variation within individuals relative to the subpopulations as F IS = 0.384 (p < 0.01) and within individuals relative to the total as F IT = 0.425 (p < 0.01).
In summary, there are subpopulations with various degrees of differentiation within some of the localities sampled. Shared migrants among particular regions result in overall high genetic connectivity across the country.
Pairwise immigration rates among populations
Bayesian assessment of migration within and among sampling localities implemented in BayesAss+.
Assignments for each individual across populations according to GeneClass.
(sum of probabilities)
Overall, BayesAss estimated about 30% of the overall individuals being exchanged with other sites (Table 2). GeneClass showed a similar pattern, with individuals successfully assigned to a known population only 20% to 40% of the time, with a slightly higher assignment rate in Sibun and Temash (54% and 60%, respectively) (Table 3). Pairwise comparisons across localities with BayesAss showed that El Pilar in the north and Pueblo Viejo in the south are mostly self-seeding, with 98% and 97% respectively of the individuals originating from within the same site. Both also contribute migrants to some of the neighbouring populations.
These analyses suggest that some areas had individuals originating from both the north and south. For example, Chiquibul has received migrants from both El Pilar and Pueblo Viejo. GeneClass showed that the Columbia population had the highest amount of migrants that originated within its boundaries, but also a high frequency of exchange with Chiquibul. The latter contrasts with the BayesAss estimates that link this population to El Pilar and Pueblo Viejo. This is probably due to the small size of the Columbia population, which can lead to biases in migration estimates calculated in BayesAss. An accurate estimate of number of individual migrants will likely arise when all potential 'ghost' populations are sampled, but both GeneClass and BayesAss provide a finer picture of immigration rates.
Isolation by distance
Significant isolation-by-distance was only detected within a subset of populations in the northern region from El Pilar, Manatee and Sibun (r xy = 0.168, p < 0.05), a region with directional migration as detected by BayesAss. Comparisons across all sampling localities and the subregions identified with STRUCTURE or directional migration patterns between Pueblo Viejo and other sites had no meaningful patterns of isolation by distance.
Within-population patterns: allele rich but highly inbred species
Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti has a mixed pattern of moderate to high allelic diversity and high inbreeding. The number of alleles per locus across sites is congruent with expectations for perennial, outcrossing species , and slightly lower than other palm species assessed with microsatellites, such as Euterpe edulis ( t = 10)  and Phoenix atlantica ( t = 8), which are both canopy palms . Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in C. ernesti-augusti is caused by an excess of homozygotes from increased inbreeding, rather than null alleles. Inbreeding estimates in C. ernesti-augusti with respect to subpopulations (F IS), and relative to the total (F IT), are higher than values reported for other palms with microsatellites [10, 59, 61], which have levels similar to those of other rainforest species [1, 62].
In most plants, the combination of low heterozygosity and high inbreeding is a result of mating and demographic factors that increase selfing and nonrandom mating between closely related individuals [e.g. [7, 63]]. In C. ernesti-augusti these patterns are most likely a result of pollination by Brooksithrips chamaedoreae thrips and demographic dynamics within populations. Despite a generalized notion in which thrips are not perceived as effective Chamaedorea pollinators [64–66] but see , thrips are the main pollinators of C. ernesti-augusti and three other sympatric congeners in Belize . Thrips have a limited dispersal range of only a few meters, therefore increasing the chances of inbreeding by landing among plants that are in close proximity to one another. Although they are limited travellers, thrips are very efficient pollinators in other plant species [68–73] and can direct their flight towards certain inflorescences [74, 75]. In Belize, clouds of B. chamaedoreae pollinate C. ernesti-augusti in a dependent mutualism in which female and male thrips receive a diverse array of rewards in both staminate and pistillate flowers . The large number of thrips moving among plants of C. ernesti-augusti transport pollen amounts comparable to other known pollinators, sufficient enough to enact pollination and subsequent fruit set . While restricted movement from thrips could result in inbreeding, its efficiency in pollination could simultaneously maintain allelic richness. Even more so if different pollen donors contribute in different years, or if thrips move among different groups of inflorescences . Specific studies on pollen versus seed-mediated gene flow will help test these hypotheses in more detail.
Complex demographic patterns within populations, such as sex-biased distributions and differences in flowering times within populations, can also result in high levels of inbreeding [7, 76]. Chamaedorea and other palm genera have local aggregations of specific cohorts or sexes [33, 77–80]. Although the distribution of nearest-neighbours of staminate and pistillate flowers in C. ernesti-augusti species is random with respect to one another, staminate and pistillate individuals are significantly aggregated at the community level . If there is mating-pair heterogeneity, or if floral resources from either females or males are not available in given years, the number of genetic donors per generation could be decreased. Local spatial distribution of sexes can lower reproductive success, decrease observed heterozygosity, and in some cases increase local differentiation [65, 81, 82]. The reduced rates of heterozygosity observed in C. ernesti-augusti may also be a consequence of reduced fruit set observed in some localities within Belize or the result of female plants having restricted fertility patterns . Two other Chamaedorea species, with a similar genetic pattern to C. ernesti-augusti, have females that only reproduce for a few years within their life cycle (C. elatior) or have populations with a subset of females dominating successful reproductive events (C. tepejilote) .
Demographic bottlenecks decrease local survival in other Chamaedorea palms (e.g. C. tuerkheimii and C. elegans; ) and could further influence patterns within populations in C. ernesti-augusti. Tree falls, common predation by ground moles, and increasing harvesting by xateros increase adult mortality in this species, reducing the number of reproductive individuals and decreasing overall survival at the community level . This species generally occurs at densities of less than 100 individuals per hectare in some areas (e.g. the Greater Maya Mountains), and at the scale of a few hundred individuals per hectare for most of its distribution . Most interestingly, its distribution across Belize is not homogenous, its density and local aggregation varying considerably [37, 84]. Low density of C. ernesti-augusti within subpopulations could further limit pollen movement by reducing the number of donors, and increasing susceptibility to genetic drift by reducing local effective population sizes. The highest number of private alleles and overall allele diversity is indeed found in localities with large contiguous populations (e.g. Chiquibul and Temash).
Genetic signature of a population decline: changes in effective population size driven by Holocene forest expansions
If recurrent landscape changes were indeed a predominant barrier to gene flow of C. ernesti-augusti populations, genetic structure through most of the Holocene would have created a southern and a southern division, with the far southeast, which has a distinct geological and geographical history, forming either an outlier or part of the southern region. Climatic change during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene have influenced the population genetics of other taxa . We know that changes in forests after the last glaciation in Central America were far from linear , but less is known about the migration and subsequent interaction of understory species. We detected a reduction in effective population size (Ne) that coincides with major climatic and landscape changes in Belize and neighbouring regions in the early Holocene [45, 46]. Prior to this time, the climate was probably too cold and/or dry to support Chamaedorea palms in the region . The genetic reduction of its effective population size at 10,715 BP suggests that C. ernesti-augusti migrated into Belize when tropical forests expanded at 10,000 BP . Its current absence from suitable limestone soils in the south of Belize due to low rainfall supports the hypothesis that this species may have migrated into this area only when humidity increased, creating a founder effect around this time. Arid episodes during the Holocene in this region probably led to reduced heterozygosity and the loss of rare alleles as population numbers and sizes decreased.
Long-distance seed dispersal has likely played an important role in Chamaedorea species that moved into Belize. Although most of the theoretical and empirical evidence of long-distance seed dispersal events comes from trees [5, 87–90], this mechanism probably occurred in other understory species during the Holocene . As Cain et al  suggested, it is likely that species with the life history characteristics of C. ernest-augusti have a stratified dispersal model, where local movements occur by one set of mechanisms (e.g. thrip pollination and local seed dispersal by mammals) and accidental or sporadic long-distance transport (e.g. dispersal by birds) occur by another.
No evidence of Mayan influence or recent fragmentation effects
Massive deforestation by the Ancient Maya over a period of 1,500 years in the same region probably reduced all western C. ernesti-augusti populations found in the understory of closed mature tropical broad-leaf forests within Belize, as well as other congeners, except C. seifrizii, which has a different distribution pattern. The impact of Mayan deforestation would result in a more recent bottleneck and yield a second subdivision within the southern region. Populations along the border with Guatemala have also recently decreased as a result of fragmentation and poorly regulated harvesting in recent years.
Population genetics theory in tropical species predicts that restricted pollen movement or human-induced barriers among populations can create an isolation-by-distance pattern [92, 93]. It also predicts that genetic erosion driven by drift could eventually decrease the overall genetic connectivity of the species in a fragmented landscape . Most forest species are indeed perceived as genetically vulnerable following human-induced fragmentation, a particularly acute problem for wild-harvested species, whose populations can suffer additional reductions as a result of over-harvesting . Yet, although C. ernesti-augusti has low heterozygosity, and has experienced at least one major reduction in its effective population size, there was no evidence of a recent mode-shift in allele frequencies across all loci in Belize patterns expected after significant changes in Ne . We did not detect changes in the past few thousand years with MSVAR (Figure 3). There is also high regional genetic connectivity and little evidence of isolation by distance throughout Belize.
There are several possible explanations for these patterns. Most likely, founder effects during the early Holocene may be confounding the detection of more recent demographic changes. Simulations have shown that genetic diversity can be maintained at the landscape level after a major founder effect , for instance if there is a combination of multiple seed-driven small founder effects that result in different maternal lineages, followed by pollen-mediated gene flow [i.e. ]. Diverse land use patterns during Mayan deforestation may have helped mitigate the impact of habitat degradation and forest fragmentation , allowing populations of C. ernesti-augusti to survive and re-expand locally. In combination with occasional long-distance seed dispersal, overlapping generations in C. ernesti-augusti could also provide sufficient time and opportunity to buffer more recent biases in allele distribution at the regional level (e.g. [98, 99]).
There is in fact, a relatively limited amount of empirical evidence of the effects of recent fragmentation on plant species . Some Neotropical and temperate plants have shown unexpectedly high levels of gene flow, in a few cases as a result of increased propagule movement after habitat deforestation [e.g. [98, 100, 101]]. Although there is no evidence of increased gene flow after fragmentation, the extent of the genetic neighbourhood and the distribution of allele frequencies within subpopulations of other Chamaedorea species (e.g. C. elatior and C. tepejilote in Mexico ) also supports the hypothesis that dispersal in C. ernesti-augusti and congeners is probably broader than previously assumed. Given that in most plants seed-mediated gene flow appears to contribute more to genetic exchange between populations than does pollen-mediated gene flow , this may be a critical factor for mitigating genetic bottlenecks or founder events. Additional studies in C. ernesti-augusti and other understory palms will help determine the exact evolutionary mechanisms behind these patterns, if long-distance seed dispersal indeed plays a major role, and if understory species are in effect as resilient to forest fragmentation as it has been suggested for canopy species .
Ongoing genetic differentiation: five highly connected genetic clusters across a north-south gradient
Despite overall gene flow across Belize, within-population dynamics increase inbreeding and create subdivision at a finer spatial scale, generating recent, ongoing differentiation within localities. Our results suggest that populations of C. ernesti-augusti can be roughly divided into five genetic clusters with a north to south gradient. Subdivisions largely agree with expectations of landscape changes during the Holocene (i.e. no subsequent division of El Pilar-Chiquibul and Sibun-Manatee after Mayan deforestation). The hierarchical analysis in STRUCTURE (Additional file 1) and the immigration matrices with BayesAss and GeneClass (Table 2) revealed varying degrees of gene flow within Belize. It is worth mentioning that our estimates of differentiation based on θST simply provide a reference to the degree of gene flow within those subpopulations. They show that there are various degrees of differentiation throughout Belize, but given the small size of each subpopulation, do not intend to provide a genetic neighbourhood or an average estimate of gene flow for the species. The different assumptions in BayesAss and GeneClass highlight the importance of taking into account sample size and 'ghost' populations. In the case of C. ernesti-augusti, a species with high gene flow and relatively small sample populations, GeneClass is probably more representative of actual immigration rates.
Subpopulations with varying degrees of differentiation reflect the distribution and density of this species, which varies throughout Belize , and for the most part correspond to contemporary geographic and ecological barriers. In the southern region, El Pilar was previously connected to Chiquibul through extensive forests on limestone soils, although contemporary forest corridors into the Vaca Forest Reserve may maintain some gene flow across the region. The high self-recruitment values within El Pilar are possibly due to recent human settlements isolating the reserve and a west to east decrease in annual rainfall that could restrict plant survival. The acidic soils of the large expanse of the Mountain Pine Ridge and the Maya Mountains may prevent direct connections between populations in the Chiquibul versus Manatee and Sibun to the southeast, and the Bladen and Columbia Reserves to the southeast. Given the association of Chamaedorea to specific local environmental conditions, variations in soil composition within each site could effectively function as fine-scale geographic barriers as they do for other plants studied .
In the south, C. ernesti-augusti occurs in small and fragmented limestone outcrops in Bladen, the locality in Belize with the highest local differentiation (θST). Columbia is connected to southern areas in the Bladen Reserve, following a limestone continuum that is disrupted towards the rest of the southern populations, but there is no evidence from either BayesAss or GeneClass of recent migration between these populations. As with Chiquibul, Pueblo Viejo and its forest extension into Guatemala have been affected by slash-and-burn agriculture during the past 30 years. Currently only pockets of forest remain, perhaps pressuring dispersers to migrate towards larger forest remnants. Interestingly, Temash has the highest numbers of alleles, a relatively high number of private alleles, and a high self-recruitment rate. It is one of the most isolated localities geographically, and also the wettest part of Belize, but acidic soils form a continuum on the east coast. The genetic connections between Temash southern sites are not yet clear, but it is possible that Mayan populations left Temash undisturbed [41, 47], thus allowing allelic richness to increase over time. It is also possible that these patterns are a result of the different geological and climatic history in Temash, which was relatively more humid than the rest of Belize during the early Holocene . A genetic assessment of Guatemalan populations could help elucidate the role of Temash (e.g. possible source of migrants during arid periods) in C. ernesti-augusti history within Belize.
Given the genetic pattern of high local inbreeding, and the potential importance of connectivity and migration through long distance dispersal in C. ernesti-augusti, it is most critical to maintain population sizes and allelic diversity within populations. One important step toward the conservation of C. ernesti-augusti is the enforcement of the existing harvesting rate regulations from the Belize Forest Department, which specify one leaf cut per individual per year . Sustained higher rates may increase mortality and decrease reproduction . Decreasing the number and sources of genetic donors within populations could result in inbreeding depression or other negative short-term consequences. If seed dispersal is indeed as important as we have hypothesized for the long-term survival of this species, excessive seed harvesting could significantly decrease gene flow among localities and could erode the existing genetic variation of this species. Aggressive and widespread seed collection to replenish emerging nurseries could exacerbate the situation, especially if seed continues to be massively collected from the same populations year after year. As Chamaedorea species become locally extinct due to overharvesting [105, 106], which has adversely affected C. ernesti-augusti in some parts of Guatemala , documenting genetic variation becomes increasingly important. In particular, understanding fine-scale genetic patterns could help tailor the management and long-term maintenance of nurseries and living collections of this important group.
Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti is characterized by a combination of high levels of regional gene flow, moderate to high allelic richness, ongoing local genetic differentiation, and low levels of heterozygosity. These patterns are in part explained by the tenfold reduction in its effective population size during climate change in Belize at ca. 10,000 BP, and by reproductive and demographic patterns within populations. In C. ernesti-augusti, high gene flow patterns with ongoing differentiation and historical changes in effective population size probably reflect the complex composition of old and new forests in Belize. We suggest that species like C. ernesti-augusti have probably survived recurrent habitat changes by a combination of long-distance dispersal that maintains genetic connectivity, and reproductive and demographic patterns that maintain allele richness at a local spatial scale. We hypothesize that thrips may actually be a critical driver of genetic patterns observed within populations in this genus, while seed dispersal by birds or mammals probably plays an important role across regions.
Although C. ernesti-augusti is inbred, inbreeding depression is probably offset over time by the overall genetic connectivity across regions, which may have allowed this species to survive deforestation patterns during the Mayan occupation of Belize. Populations in Belize can be roughly divided into five genetic groups clustered into south and south, which correspond to geographic barriers, including differences in soil composition. Although the detrimental effects of a future reduction in gene flow should not be discounted, changes in demography due to overharvesting or localized ecological degradation are more likely to be critical for preventing genetic erosion in C. ernesti-augusti. Characterization of the direct relationship between demographic and genetic patterns, estimates of seed and pollen-mediated gene flow, and the population genetics of Central American and Mexican populations, will offer additional insights into the effects of regional and localized environmental changes through time, and shed light into specific mechanisms, such as long-distance seed dispersal. We are currently investigating genetic patterns in congeners in Belize and C. ernesti-augusti in Mexico, to determine whether the patterns observed in the present study are consistent across the species and in other species of Chamaedorea, or are unique to Belizean populations of C. ernesti-augusti.
Eight sites representing the broad distribution of C. ernesti-augusti across Belize were sampled for a total of 138 adults (Figure. 2). Euclidean distances among locations range from 20 km to 70 km. Samples were collected pivotal to a specified central point in each locality. Within sites, samples were collected from an area within 1 km2 with at least 3 m separating individuals.
Genotyping and genetic variation
QIAGEN DNEasy Mini kits (Valencia, CA) were used to isolate DNA from leaf tissue. We characterized nine nuclear microsatellites to measure genetic variation following Cibrián-Jaramillo et al . Dataset editing and formatting was done with the Excel Microsatellite Toolkit. Linkage disequilibrium (LD)  and deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) could indicate the presence of population structure or inbreeding , therefore the presence of LD was investigated at the 5% statistical significance level among loci per population based on sampling sites with 10,000 permutations. Departure from HWE expectations was tested for each locus with default parameters; both analyses were carried out in Arlequin. Heterozygosity was measured as the unbiased expected heterozygosity (He), and observed heterozygosity (Ho) corrected for sample size . All genetic variation estimates were obtained in Genetix v4.05 . The presence of null alleles and allelic dropout was tested using Micro-checker v2.2.1 , which calculates the probabilities for the observed number of homozygotes within homozygote classes using a cumulative binomial distribution .
Genetic signature of a population decline
If the effective population size of C. ernesti-augusti suffered a bottleneck or a founder effect after climate change in the Holocene and/or after Mayan deforestation, populations should show a bias in the distribution of allele frequencies. Alleles at low frequency (<0.1) would be less abundant and rare alleles would be lost, often resulting in an excess of heterozygotes [55, 116]. Allelic richness was measured based on the number of alleles per population (A T ), the number of alleles with a frequency greater than 5% (AT 5%), less than 50% (AT<50%), and the number of private alleles (A P ) . The distribution of allele frequencies was estimated following the graphical method of Luikart et al .
We also examined traces of a major population change and, most importantly, the time in generations since the population size changed, using the coalescent-based Markov chain Monte Carlo method  implemented in MSVAR v1.3 . This method assumes a single population (all eight localities of C. ernesti-augusti in Belize together) of size N1 that changed in size exponentially or linearly in the past (t a generations ago) up to the current population of size N0. The posterior distribution of the demographic and genealogical history is given by a prior distribution of demographic and mutational parameters. These are tf = t a /N0, r = N0/N1 and q = 2N0m, where m is the locus mutation rate, tf is the time at which the population started changing in size, scaled by N0, the population size at present (time of sampling), and N1 is the population size in the past. Given the lack of information on the evolution of microsatellites in palms, we varied the microsatellite mutation rate (10-3, 10-4, 10-5) in order to examine the congruence of posterior estimates of N1 to N0, and t. We also varied the generation time with five and 10 years using a mutation rate of 10-3. We used the exponential change model with the remaining parameters as defaults for all runs. An exponential model is more suitable for modelling population changes over a shorter time scale (e.g. as a result of a sudden expansion). Each run was conducted for 200 million generations with a 104-step thinning interval.
We used a 50% burn-in before combining the posterior parameter estimates. Priors were the same across all runs except for the hyperprior means and variances for log N1. Those were established as 4.0 3 0 0.5; 3.5 3 0 0.5; 3.0 3 0 0.5; 3.0 3 0 0.5; and 3.0 3 0 0.5, for αN1, σN1, βN1, and τN1, respectively. In order to examine the congruence among independent runs with the same initial assumptions, we chose the scenario with m = 10-3 and a generation time of 10 years, and conducted five independent runs with the remaining parameters as described. We chose 10 years to take into account the fact that not all individuals reproduce yearly, not all seeds survive and seeds are sourced from a few plants . Posterior densities were plotted in R v2.6.1 http://cran.r-project.org.
We estimated an overall measure of differentiation across all localities using θST. To test the hypothesis that gene flow is reduced among regions that could have been historically subdivided, we measured AMOVA f-statistics  with Pilar, Chiquibul, Sibun, and Manatee grouped into the southern region, and Columbia, Pueblo, Bladen, and Temash into the southern region. These calculations were carried out in Arlequin.
STRUCTURE  was used to estimate the number of genetic clusters (K) given the sampled genotypes. All individuals were clustered first without providing information on their geographic origin. Ten independent runs were performed, with values of K ranging from 1 to 10, a burn-in of 200,000 generations and a subsequent 300,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps. Allele frequencies were assumed to correlate (prior mean = 0.01, prior SD = 0.05, λ = 1.0). Because we assumed that each individual draws a fraction of its genome from each of the K clusters, we set a uniform prior on admixture and α (initial value = 1.0, max = 10.0, SD = 0.025) as recommended by . Admixture and allele frequency correlation are viewed as valid assumptions in the case of subtle population structure (e.g. F ST <0.05) . A second run with the same parameters was performed providing a priori information on geographic origin, and a third hierarchical analysis run was used to test the most likely number of clusters within each expected north and south region, until a single cluster was found (K = 1). θ ST was calculated within localities that had subpopulations. In all sets of runs, the most probable number of genetic clusters was determined from the approximation of the posterior probability for different values of K from independent runs for each K. The lowest log probability of the data Pr (X|K), in combination with the smallest variance for each value of K, was used as a measure of the most likely number of clusters, as recommended by . The second-order rate of change of the log probability of the data with respect to the number of clusters (ΔK) was also used as an estimator of the most likely number of clusters .
Recent immigration among sites
We tested for recent subdivision using BayesAss+ v1.3 . This method estimates a matrix of pairwise recent immigration rates among populations, m, using a coalescent approach. This approach assumes that the estimated clusters are a result of gene flow in very recent generations . Default settings for burn-in and number of MCMC iterations were enough to reach convergence based on visual inspection of likelihood scores. Five independent runs were performed to test for congruence, and a likelihood ratio test was then employed to determine whether the prior and posterior probabilities of migration rates are significantly different from each other . The presence of linkage among some loci and the overlapping generations of C. ernesti-augusti could decrease the accuracy of each estimate, but not necessarily change the relative proportions of m among localities.
Small and contrasting sample sizes may confound estimates in this method, so we compared BayesAss+ with individual assignments using the frequency criterion of Paetkau et al , implemented in GeneClass v2.0 . The frequency method approximates the distribution of genotype likelihoods of the individual that will be assigned to the simulated distribution of a reference population. It takes into account type I error and reduces the amount of resident individuals being excluded, as well as incorporating the sampling variance that results from different population sizes .
Isolation by distance
Limited dispersal can result in a pattern of genetic differentiation that increases with geographic distance. Isolation by distance (IBD) was tested with a Mantel test for matrix correspondence [84, 126]. Genalex v.6 was used to produce a geographic and genetic distance matrix using pairwise individual comparisons, following  and . A Mantel test with populations using  linearized distance Fst/(1-Fst) was also calculated on the IBD webserver available at http://ibdws.sdsu.edu/~ibdws/.
We thank Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis for his help with MSVAR analysis and comments on the manuscript. We also thank Aidan Daily for writing a Java script to organize the BayesAss output into immigration matrices. SB is grateful to the Belize Forest Department for permission to conduct research in Belize. We acknowledge the assistance of Nicodemus Bol, Victor Quiroz, and the staff of the Las Cuevas Research Station for the collection of genetic material. Thanks are due to Nick Wicks (Yaxaché Conservation Trust), the Sarstoon-Temash Institute for Indigenous Management, the staff of BFREE Research Station, the Bladen Management Consortium, and the Programme for Belize. SB was partially financed by the UK-funded Darwin Initiative project "Xaté palms (Chamaedorea spp.) in Belize: conservation and sustainable management" (project no. 162/12/012). CDB is grateful for the support from NSF EF-0542288 and DEB-0817033. ACJ and WJH acknowledge the support of NSF grants DEB-0212779 and DEB-0454510. ACJ and RD acknowledge the support of the Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program in Molecular Systematics.
- Hamrick JL, Godt MJW: Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 1996, 351 (1345): 1291-1298. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0112.Google Scholar
- Linhart YB: Mosaic landscapes, family structure and evolution. Trends in Ecol Evol. 1999, 14 (10): 367-377. 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01702-4.Google Scholar
- Vekemans X, Hardy O: New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plant populations. Mol Ecol. 2004, 13: 921-935. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02076.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sork VL, Smouse PE: Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landscape Ecol. 2006, 21 (6): 821-836. 10.1007/s10980-005-5415-9.Google Scholar
- Nathan R, Schurr F, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A: Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends in Ecol Evol. 2008, 23 (11): 638-647. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.08.003.Google Scholar
- Dransfield J, Uhl W, Asmussen C, Baker W, Harley M, Lewis C: Genera Palmarum. The Evolution and Classification of Palms. 2008, Richmond: Kew PublishingGoogle Scholar
- Luna R, Epperson BK, Oyama K: High levels of genetic variability and inbreeding in two Neotropical dioecious palms with contrasting life histories. Heredity. 2007, 99: 466-476. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luna R, Epperson BK, Oyama K: Spatial genetic structure of two sympatric neotropical palms with contrasting life histories. Heredity. 2005, 95: 298-305. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Ramos M, Oyama K: Estructura y variacion genetica de las poblaciones de algunas especies de interes comercial del genero Chamaedorea en Mexico. Investigaciones sobre recursos maderables de Mexico: Biologia evolutiva y Conservacion del genero Chamaedorea - REPORTE. Edited by: Martinez-Ramos M, Oyama K. 1998, Morelia, Michoacan: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico - Instituto de Ecologiìa MoreliaGoogle Scholar
- Eguiarte LE, Pereznasser N, Pinero D: Genetic-Structure, Outcrossing Rate and Heterosis in Astrocaryum-Mexicanum (Tropical Palm) - Implications for Evolution and Conservation. Heredity. 1992, 69: 217-228. 10.1038/hdy.1992.119.Google Scholar
- Shapcott A: Comparison of the population genetics and densities of five Pinanga palm species at Kuala Belalong, Brunei. Mol Ecol. 1999, 8 (10): 1641-1654. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00749.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson DV: Tropical Palms. On-wood forest products. 1995, Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 20-Google Scholar
- Wright J, Muller-Landau H: The Uncertain Future of Tropical Forest Species. Biotropica. 2006, 38 (4): 443-445. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00177.x.Google Scholar
- Hamrick JL: Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manage. 2004, 197 (1): 323-335. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.023.Google Scholar
- Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, Howe HF: The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol. 2008, 22 (4): 878-885. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00944.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gentry AH, Emmons LH: Geographical Variation in Fertility, Phenology, and Composition of the Understory of Neotropical Forests. Biotropica. 1987, 19 (3): 216-227. 10.2307/2388339.Google Scholar
- Hodel DR: Chamaedorea Palms: the species and their cultivation. 1992, Lawrence, Kansas: Allen PressGoogle Scholar
- Oyama K, Dirzo R, Ibarra-Manriquez G: Population structure of the dominant palm species in the understory of a Mexican lowland rain forest. Tropics. 1993, 2 (1): 23-28. 10.3759/tropics.2.23.Google Scholar
- Svenning JC: Microhabitat specialization in a species-rich palm community in Amazonian Ecuador. J Ecol. 1999, 87 (1): 55-65. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00329.x.Google Scholar
- Souza AF, Martins FR: Spatial distribution of an undergrowth palm in fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Plant Ecol. 2003, 164 (2): 141-155. 10.1023/A:1021229832634.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson PB: The uniqueness of palms. Bot J Linn Soc. 2006, 151 (1): 5-14. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00520.x.Google Scholar
- Svenning JC: Small canopy gaps influence plant distributions in the rain forest understory. Biotropica. 2000, 32 (2): 252-261.Google Scholar
- Brosofske KD, Chen J, Crow TR: Understory vegetation and site factors: implications for a managed Wisconsin landscape. For Ecol Manage. 2001, 146 (1-3): 75-87. 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00447-3.Google Scholar
- Villegas AC: Spatial and temporal variability in clonal reproduction of Aechmea magdalenae, a tropical understory herb. Biotropica. 2001, 33 (1): 48-59.Google Scholar
- Williams-Linera G: Temporal and spatial phenological variation of understory shrubs in a tropical montane cloud forest. Biotropica. 2003, 35 (1): 28-36.Google Scholar
- Vekemans X, Hardy OJ: New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plant populations. Molecular Ecology. 2004, 13: 921-935. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02076.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hodel DR: Chamaedorea palms. The species and their cultivation. 1992, Lawrence, Kansas: International Palm SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Henderson A, Galeano G, Bernal R: Field Guide to the Palms of the Americas. 1995, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
- Hodel D: Additions to Chamaedorea palms: New species from Mexico and Guatemala and miscellaneous notes. Principes. 1992, 36: 188-202.Google Scholar
- Porter-Morgan H: Trips as primary pollinators of sympatric species of Chamaedorea (Arecaceae) in Belize. 2007, New York City: The City University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ibarra-Manriquez G, K Oyama: Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain forest trees. Am J Bot. 1992, 79 (4): 383-394. 10.2307/2445150.Google Scholar
- Moore HE: Proposal to Conserve Chamaedorea Willd over Morenia Ruiz Et Pavon (Palmae). Taxon. 1978, 27 (5-6): 555-556. 10.2307/1219930.Google Scholar
- Zarco EV: Patrones biogeográficos y filogeográficos del género Chamaedorea. BSc Thesis. 1999, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Wicks N: Niche diversification in a Neotropical palm community. 2003, University of London (Imperial College/The Natural History Museum, London)Google Scholar
- La extracción de palmas camedoras en México: un grave riesgo de perdida de diversidad biológica. [http://mx.geocities.com/pssm_ac/]
- Hodel DR: In search of a sustainable palm market in North America. 2002, America TCfECiN. Montreal, Quebec: Commission for Environmental Cooperation in North AmericaGoogle Scholar
- Bridgewater SGM, Pickles P, Garwood NC, Penn M, Bateman RM, Porter-Morgan H, Wicks N, Bol N: Chamaedorea (Xate) in the greater Maya mountains and the Chiquibul Forest Reserve, Belize: an economic assessment of a non-timber forest product. Econ Bot. 2006, 60 (3):Google Scholar
- Garwood NC, Bridgewater SGM, Bateman RM, Wicks N, Penn M, Bol N, Quiroz V: Conservation and Sustainable Management of Chamaedorea Palms in Belize. Botany: 2006; Chico, California. 2006Google Scholar
- Porter-Morgan H: Towards the sustainable use of xateì palms in Belize (Chamaedorea spp.): the effects of defoliation on leaf growth and reproduction. Report UK Darwin Initiative. 2005, London: UK Darwin InitiativeGoogle Scholar
- Biodiversity & Environmental Resource Data System (BERDS). [http://www.biodiversity.bz/find/specimens/]
- Piperno DR: Quaternary environmental history and agricultural impact in Central America. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 2006, 93: 274-296. 10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[274:QEHAAI]2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
- Clark J, Grimm E, Lynch J, Mueller P: Effects of the Holocene climate change in the C4 grassland/woodland boundary in the northern plains, USA. Ecology. 2001, 82 (3): 620-636.Google Scholar
- Valenti R: Holocene global warming and the origin of the Neotropical Gran Sabana in the Venezuelan Guayana. J Biogeogr. 2007, 34 (2): 279-288. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01620.x.Google Scholar
- Mario de Vivo APC: Holocene vegetation change and the mammal faunas of South America and Africa. J Biogeogr. 2004, 31 (6): 943-957. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01068.x.Google Scholar
- Hillesheim MBHD, Leyen B, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Anselmetti FS, Ariztegui D, Buck DG, Guilderson TP, Rosenmeier MF, Schnurrenberger DW: Climate change in lowland Central America during the late deglacial and early Holocene. Journal of Quaternary Science. 2005, 20: 363-376. 10.1002/jqs.924.Google Scholar
- Leyden B: Guatemalan Forest Synthesis after Pleistocene Aridity. PNAS Biological Sciences. 1984, 81 (15): 4856-4859.Google Scholar
- Beach T, Dunning N, Luzzadder-Beach S, Cook D, Lohse J, Catena J: Impacts of the ancient Maya on soils and soil erosion in the central Maya Lowlands. Catena. 2006, 65: 166-178. 10.1016/j.catena.2005.11.007.Google Scholar
- Garber J: The Ancient Maya of the Belize Valley. 2004, Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida PressGoogle Scholar
- Chase AF, Chase DZ: A mighty Maya nation: How Caracol built an empire by cultivating its middle class. Archaeology. 1996, 49 (5): 66-72.Google Scholar
- Healey PF, Lambert JDH, Arnason JT, Hebda RJ: Caracol, Belize: Evidence of ancient Maya terraces. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1983, 10 (4): 397-410. 10.2307/529463.Google Scholar
- Merrill T: Guyana and Belize: country studies. 1993, Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, 2Google Scholar
- Biodiversity and Environmental Resource Data System of Belize. [http://www.biodiversity.bz]
- Penn M, Moncrieff C, Bridgewater S, Garwood N, RM B, Chan I, Cho P: Using GIS techniques to model the distribution of the economically important xaté palm Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti within the Greater Maya Mountains, Belize. Systematics and Biodiversity. 2008, 7 (1): 63-72. 10.1017/S1477200008002880.Google Scholar
- Peakall R, Smouse PE, Huff DR: Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of dioecious buffalograss Buchloe dactyloides. Mol Ecol. 1995, 4: 135-147. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00203.x.Google Scholar
- Luikart G, Cornuet JM: Empirical Evaluation of a Test for Identifying Recently Bottlenecked Populations from Allele Frequency Data. Conserv Biol. 1998, 12 (1): 228-237. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96388.x.Google Scholar
- Beaumont MA: Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. Genetics. 1999, 153: 2013-2029.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beaumont MA, Rannala B: The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004, 5 (4): 251-261. 10.1038/nrg1318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J: Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14 (8): 2611-2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gaiotto FA, Grattapaglia D, Vencovsky R: Genetic Structure, Mating System, and Long-Distance Gene Flow in Heart of Palm (Euterpe edulis Mart.). J Hered. 2003, 94: 5-10.1093/jhered/esg087.Google Scholar
- Henderson SA, Billotte N, Pintaud JC: Genetic isolation of Cape Verde Island Phoenix atlantica (Arecaceae) revealed by microsatellite markers. Conserv Genet. 2006, 7 (2): 213-223. 10.1007/s10592-006-9128-7.Google Scholar
- Billotte N, Couvreur T, Marseillac N, Brottier P, Perthuis B, Vallejo M, Noyer JL, Jacquemoud-Collet JP, Risterucci AM, Pintaud JC: A new set of microsatellite markers for the peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth); characterization and across-taxa utility within the tribe Cocoeae. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004, 4: 580-582. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00741.x.Google Scholar
- Bawa KS: Mating systems, genetic differentiation and speciation in tropical rain forest plants. Biotropica. 1992, 24: 250-255. 10.2307/2388519.Google Scholar
- Degen B, Bandou E, Caron H: Limited pollen dispersal and biparental inbreeding in Symphonia globulifera in French Guiana. Heredity. 2004, 93 (6): 585-591. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Listabarth C: Insect-Induced Wind Pollination of the Palm Chamaedorea pinnatifrons and Pollination in the Related Wendlandiella Sp. Biodivers Conserv. 1993, 2 (1): 39-50. 10.1007/BF00055101.Google Scholar
- Otero-Arnaiz A, Oyama K: Reproductive phenology, seed-set and pollination in Chamaedorea alternans, an understorey dioecious palm in a rain forest in Mexico. J Trop Ecol. 2001, 17: 745-754. 10.1017/S0266467401001559.Google Scholar
- Berry EJ, Gorchov DL: Reproductive biology of the dioecious understorey palm Chamaedorea radicalis in a Mexican cloud forest: pollination vector, flowering phenology and female fecundity. J Trop Ecol. 2004, 20: 369-376. 10.1017/S0266467404001397.Google Scholar
- González-Cervantes E, Martínez Mena A, Quero H, Márquez-Guzmán J: Embryology of Chamaedorea elegans (Arecaceae): Microsporangium, microsporogenesis, and microgametogenesis. Principes. 1997, 41: 131-137.Google Scholar
- Tang W: Cycad insects and pollination. Vistas in paleobotany and plant morphology: evolutionary and environmental perspectives, Professor D.D. Pant Memorial Volume. 2004, 380-394.Google Scholar
- Appanah S, Chan T: Thrips: the pollinators of some dipterocarps. Malaysian Forester. 1981, 44: 234-252.Google Scholar
- Williams G, Adam P, Mound L: Thrips (Thysanoptera) pollination in Australian subtropical rainforests, with particular reference to pollination of Wilkiea huegeliana (Monimiaceae). J Nat Hist. 2001, 1-21. 35Google Scholar
- Thien L: Patterns of pollination in the primitive angiosperms. Biotropica. 1980, 12: 1-13. 10.2307/2387768.Google Scholar
- Gottsberger G: Pollination and evolution in Neotropical Annonaceae. Plant Species Biol. 1999, 14: 143-152. 10.1046/j.1442-1984.1999.00018.x.Google Scholar
- Terry LI, Walter GH, Donaldson JS, Snow E, Forster PI, Machin PJ: Pollination of Australian Macrozamia cycads (Zamiaceae): effectiveness and behavior of specialist vectors in a dependent mutualism 1. Am J Bot. 2005, 92 (6): 931-940. 10.3732/ajb.92.6.931.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mound LA: THYSANOPTERA: Diversity and Interactions. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005, 50 (1): 247-269. 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis T: Thrips: their biology, ecology and economic importance. 1973, London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Shapcott A, Playford J: Comparison of genetic variability in remnant and wide-spread rainforest understorey species of Austromyrtus (Myrtaceae). Biodivers Conserv. 1996, 5 (7): 881-895. 10.1007/BF00054740.Google Scholar
- Sterner RW, Ribic CA, Schatz GE: Testing for Life Historical Changes in Spatial Patterns of Four Tropical Tree Species. The Journal of Ecology. 1986, 74 (3): 621-633. 10.2307/2260386.Google Scholar
- Ataroff M, Schwarzkopf T: Leaf Production, Reproductive Patterns, Field Germination and Seedling Survival in Chamaedorea bartlingiana, a Dioecious Understory Palm. Oecologia. 1992, 92 (2): 250-256. 10.1007/BF00317372.Google Scholar
- Barot S, Gignoux J, Menaut JC: Demography of a Savanna Palm Tree: Predictions from Comprehensive Spatial Pattern Analyses. Ecology. 1999, 80 (6): 1987-2005.Google Scholar
- Souza AF, Martins FR, Bernacci LC: Clonal growth and reproductive strategies of the understory tropical palm Geonoma brevispatha: an ontogenetic approach. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique. 2003, 81 (2): 101-112. 10.1139/b03-002.Google Scholar
- Oyama K: Biologia comparativa entre individuos masculinos y femeninos de Chamaedorea tepejilote (Liebm). 1984, Ciudad de Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Luna R: Demografýa y Genetica Poblacional de Chamaedorea elatior en la Selva de Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz. 1999, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Ramos M, Oyama K: Efecto de la cosecha de hojas sobre la dinamica foliar y de poblaciones en especies de Chamaedorea de importancia comercial y biologica. Investigaciones sobre recursos maderables de Mexico: Biologia evolutiva y Conservacion del genero Chamaedorea - REPORTE. Edited by: Martinez-Ramos M, Oyama K. 1998, Morelia, Michoacan: Universidad Nacional Autoìnoma de Meìxico - Instituto de Ecologiìa MoreliaGoogle Scholar
- Smouse P, JC Long, RR Sokal: Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology. 1986, 35: 627-632. 10.2307/2413122.Google Scholar
- Hadly EA, Ramakrishnan U, Chan YL, Tuinen MvOKK: Genetic response to climatic change: insights from ancient DNA and phylochronology. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (10): e290-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020290.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leyden B: Pollen evidence for climatic variability and cultural disturbance in the Maya Lowlands. Ancient Mesoamerica. 2002, 13: 85-101. 10.1017/S0956536102131099.Google Scholar
- Birks H: Holocene isochrone maps and patterns of tree-spreading in the British Isles. J Biogeogr. 1989, 16: 503-540. 10.2307/2845208.Google Scholar
- Clark J: Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecord. Am Nat. 1998, 152: 204-224. 10.1086/286162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark JS, M Silman, R Kern, E Macklin, J HillerRisLambers: Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology. 1999, 80: 1475-1494.Google Scholar
- Skellam J: Random dispersal in theoretical populations. 1951, 38: 196-218.Google Scholar
- Cain ML, Milligan BG, Strand AE: Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. Am J Bot. 2000, 87 (9): 1217-1227. 10.2307/2656714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rousset F: Genetic differentiation between individuals. J Evol Biol. 2000, 13 (1): 58-62. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00137.x.Google Scholar
- Slatkin M: Isolation by Distance in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Populations. Evolution. 1993, 47 (1): 264-279. 10.2307/2410134.Google Scholar
- Hedrick PW: Genetics of populations- 2nd edition. 2000, Boston: Jones and BarlettGoogle Scholar
- Gepts P: Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Utilization: The Accomplishments and Future of a Societal Insurance Policy. Crop Sci. 2006, 46 (5): 2278-10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0169gas.Google Scholar
- Bialozyt R, Ziegenhagen B, Petit R: Contrasting effects of long distance seed dispersal on genetic diversity during range expansion. J Evol Biol. 2006, 19: 12-20. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00995.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liepelt S, Bialozyt R, Ziegenhagen B: Wind-dispersed pollen mediates postglacial gene flow among refugia. PNAS. 2002, 99: 14590-14594. 10.1073/pnas.212285399.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craft KJ, Ashley MV: Landscape genetic structure of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) savannas in Illinois. For Ecol Manage. 2007, 239: 13-20. 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.11.005.Google Scholar
- O'Connell L, Mosseler A, Rajora O: Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (Picea glauca) at the landscape level. Heredity. 2006, 97: 418-426. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W: Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. PNAS. 2002, 99 (4): 2038-2042. 10.1073/pnas.042649999.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dayanandan S, Dole J, Bawa K, Kesseli R: Population structure delineated with microsatellite markers in fragmented populations of a tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Mol Ecol. 1999, 8 (10): 1585-1592. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00735.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ennos RA: Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity. 1994, 72: 250-259. 10.1038/hdy.1994.35.Google Scholar
- Dubbin WE, Penn MG, Hodson ME: Edaphic influences on plant community adaptation in the Chiquibul forest of Belize. Geoderma. 2006, 131: 76-88. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.03.003.Google Scholar
- Bridgewater S, Garwood NC, Bateman RM, Penn MG, Porter-Morgan H, Wicks N, Pickles P: Recommendations for sustainable management of the Chamaedorea (xateì) resources of the Chiquibul Forest Reserve, Belize. 2007, UK: Darwin Initiative, 40-Google Scholar
- Escalera-Mas CE: Caracterización de los factores ecológicos relevantes en las comunidades donde el shate (Chamaedorea spp.) es componente, en San Miguel la Palotada, Petén. 1993, Guatemala: Universidad de San Carlos de GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
- Radachowsky J, Ramos VH, Garcia R, López J, Fajardo A: Effects of managed extraction on populations of the understorey palm, xaté (Chamaedorea sp.) in northern Guatemala: Monitoring ecological integrity of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Péten, Guatemala. 2004, Society WCGoogle Scholar
- Reyes-Rodas R, Landivar R, Wilshusen RP: El rol de los productos naturales en el desarrollo rural, el alivio a la pobreza y gobernabilidad en el manejo del recurso. El caso de la palma de Xate (Chamaedorea spp) en la region del Peten, Guatemala. 2006, USAIDGoogle Scholar
- Cibrián-Jaramillo A, Hahn WJ, DeSalle R: Development of microsatellite loci in a Mexican understory palm Chamaedorea elegans, cross-species genotyping in C. ernesti-augustii, and amplification in five congeneric species. Mol Ecol Resources. 2008, 8 (2): 322-324. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01942.x.Google Scholar
- Park SDE: Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection. 2001, University of DublinGoogle Scholar
- Weir BS: Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data. 1996, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- Hartl DL, Clark AG: Principles of population genetics. 1997, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 3Google Scholar
- Excoffier L, G Laval, S Schneider: Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2005, 1: 47-50.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nei M: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978, 89 (3): 583-590.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F: GENETIX, logiciel sous Windows™ pour la génétique des populations. 2004, Montpellier, France: Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions. CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, 4.05Google Scholar
- Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P: PROGRAM NOTE: micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004, 4 (3): 535-538. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x.Google Scholar
- Cornuet JM, Luikart G: Description and Power Analysis of Two Tests for Detecting Recent Population Bottlenecks From Allele Frequency Data. Genetics. 1996, 144 (4): 2001-2014.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maguire TL, Peakall R, Saenger P: Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in the mangrove species Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. (Avicenniaceae) detected by AFLPs and SSRs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002, 104 (2): 388-398. 10.1007/s001220100724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Storz JF, Beaumont MA: Testing for genetic evidence of population expansion and contraction: an empirical analysis of microsatellite DNA variation using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Evolution. 2002, 56 (1): 154-166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weir BS, Cockerham CC: Estimating F-Statistics for the Analysis of Population-Structure. Evolution. 1984, 38 (6): 1358-1370. 10.2307/2408641.Google Scholar
- Excoffier L, Smouse PE, J Q: Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992, 131: 479-491.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000, 155 (2): 945-959.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK: Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data: Linked Loci and Correlated Allele Frequencies. Genetics. 2003, 164 (4): 1567-1587.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson G, Rannala B: Bayesian Inference of Recent Migration Rates Using Multilocus Genotypes. Genetics. 2003, 163: 1177-1191.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A: Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol. 2004, 13 (1): 55-65. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02008.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A: GENECLASS2: A Software for Genetic Assignment and First-Generation Migrant Detection. J Hered. 2004, 95 (6): 536-539. 10.1093/jhered/esh074.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smouse PE, Long JC: Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. 1992, 35: 187-213. 10.1002/ajpa.1330350608.Google Scholar
- Smouse PEPR: Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity. 1999, 82: 561-573. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rousset F: Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics. 1997, 145: 1219-1228.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bohonak AJ: IBD (isolation by distance): A program for analyses of isolation by distance. J Hered. 2002, 93 (2): 153-154. 10.1093/jhered/93.2.153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.