Test Sample ID | Test Sample | Allocation to River of Capture | Assignment to River of Capture | Allocation to Pooled River of Capture | Assignment to Pooled River of Capture | Allocation to Region of Capture | Assignment to Region of Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | Lune (2005-05) | 15.751* (8.101) | 13.725 (0.747, 0.4343-0.999) | 74.391 (13.783) | 88.235 (0.793, 0.440-0.999) | 92.320 (6.200) | 100 |
T2 | Ribble (2004) | 56.282* (24.379) | 74.000 (0.658, 0.197-0.997) | 66.488* (9.371) | 76.000 (0.759, 0.279-1.000) | 93.389 (5.153) | 100 |
T3 | Dee (1984-88) | 3.563* (4.820) | 2.041 (0.751, 0.290-0.998) | 45.607* (15.734) | 46.000 (0.668, 0.2682-0.998) | 77.427 (9.189) | 87.76 |
T4 | Tamar (1987) | 95.070* (3.860) | 100.000 (0.857, 0.475-1.000) | 84.513* (7.008) | 90.000 (0.930, 0.670-1.000) | 96.356 (3.472) | 100 |
T5 | Mudeford (2006) | 97.601 (2.163) | 100.000 (0.999, 0.991-1.000) | 97.527 (2.172) | 100 (0.999, 0.978-1.000) | 97.802 (2.127) | 100 |
T6 | Aven+ (2005) | 87.172 (5.885) | 91.892 (0.961, 0.616-1.000) | 86.438 (6.621) | 91.892 (0.956, 0.506-1.000) | 96.347 (3.260) | 100 |
T7 | Narcea (2006) | 83.287 (5.207) | 87.387 (0.919, 0.502-1.000) | 85.819 (6.294) | 91.892 (0.900, 0.515-1.000) | 99.068 (0.875) | 100 |
Mean | Â | 34.00 | 56.44 | 85.82 | 91.89 | 93.24 | 98.25 |