Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Individual assignment performance for the four selection methods

From: Evaluation of approaches for identifying population informative markers from high density SNP Chips

  delta    pairwise Wright's FST   pairwise W&C's FST PCA   
Log10 90% 95% 98% 90% 95% 98% 90% 95% 98% 90% 95% 98%
0 42.47 59.94 86.48 40.25 57.44 83.72 36.53 62.89 103.07 50.58 75.52 116.07
1 67.97 90.99 129.36 60.12 80.50 114.45 64.37 89.21 129.27 71.85 98.36 152.26
2 95.62 126.63 179.26 80.02 104.62 147.79 89.63 119.13 171.29 101.62 139.54 283.40
3 123.46 159.05 209.70 105.41 137.29 195.69 120.04 159.83 241.62 139.72 192.40 403.89
  1. Estimated number of SNP markers required to achieve 90%, 95% and 98% correct assignment at the four stringency thresholds for each SNP selection method (the individuals from the two Angus populations are pooled). Numbers estimated from asymptotic regression equation.