Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Genome-wide association study identified three major QTL for carcass weight including the PLAG1-CHCHD7 QTN for stature in Japanese Black cattle

  • 1,
  • 1, 5,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 5Email author
BMC Genetics201213:40

  • Received: 28 January 2012
  • Accepted: 20 May 2012
  • Published:



Significant quantitative trait loci (QTL) for carcass weight were previously mapped on several chromosomes in Japanese Black half-sib families. Two QTL, CW-1 and CW-2, were narrowed down to 1.1-Mb and 591-kb regions, respectively. Recent advances in genomic tools allowed us to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in cattle to detect associations in a general population and estimate their effect size. Here, we performed a GWAS for carcass weight using 1156 Japanese Black steers.


Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant associations were detected in three chromosomal regions on bovine chromosomes (BTA) 6, 8, and 14. The associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on BTA 6 were in linkage disequilibrium with the SNP encoding NCAPG Ile442Met, which was previously identified as a candidate quantitative trait nucleotide for CW-2. In contrast, the most highly associated SNP on BTA 14 was located 2.3-Mb centromeric from the previously identified CW-1 region. Linkage disequilibrium mapping led to a revision of the CW-1 region within a 0.9-Mb interval around the associated SNP, and targeted resequencing followed by association analysis highlighted the quantitative trait nucleotides for bovine stature in the PLAG1-CHCHD7 intergenic region. The association on BTA 8 was accounted for by two SNP on the BovineSNP50 BeadChip and corresponded to CW-3, which was simultaneously detected by linkage analyses using half-sib families. The allele substitution effects of CW-1, CW-2, and CW-3 were 28.4, 35.3, and 35.0 kg per allele, respectively.


The GWAS revealed the genetic architecture underlying carcass weight variation in Japanese Black cattle in which three major QTL accounted for approximately one-third of the genetic variance.


  • GWAS
  • QTL
  • Carcass weight
  • Body size
  • Body weight
  • Growth trait
  • Cattle


Carcass weight is an economically important trait for livestock raised for meat production. Carcass weight is highly correlated with body weight and body size. We previously performed bovine quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using Japanese Black paternal half-sib families and detected significant linkages with carcass weight on bovine chromosome (BTA) 1, 6, 7, 10, and 14 [1]. Further analyses of the half-sib QTL revealed a carcass weight QTL on BTA 8. QTL on BTA 14, 6, and 8 were validated in another family and designated CW-1 CW 2, and CW 3, respectively, of which CW-1 and CW 2 were narrowed down to 1.1 Mb [2] and 591 kb [3], respectively.

The recent development of genomic tools such as the BovineSNP50 BeadChip [4] allowed us to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in our bovine populations. This approach will improve the resolution of the QTL and enable us to estimate the allele frequency and effect size of a QTL in a given population. Several GWAS using the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips for bovine growth-related traits have been reported. Snelling et al. [5] detected the strongest association on BTA 6 and others on BTAs 7, 10, 11, 14, 20, and 23 that reached a Bonferroni-corrected significance level using more than 2500 crossbred beef cattle, although they did not indicate the portion of heritability that could be accounted for by the associated SNP. The association on BTA 6 corresponds to CW-2[3] and the orthologous region in humans includes the NCAPG-LCORL region that was identified as one of the loci associated with human adult height [6, 7]. In bovine, CW-2 was associated with body size; including body length, width, and height; and the association with withers height was strongest [8]. Pausch et al. [9] detected a Bonferroni-corrected significant association with body size only on BTA 14 using 1800 bulls of the German Fleckvieh breed. The association also corresponded to the loci for human adult height, including PLAG1, MOS, CHCHD7, RDHE2, RPS20, LYN, TGS1, and PENK[7, 10]. They identified a highly significantly associated SNP in a putative polyadenylation signal of RPS20. Karim et al. [11], however, recently identified causative variations influencing bovine stature in the PLAG1-CHCHD7 intergenic region. This QTL also influences body weight and the quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) modulate the expression of the surrounding genes, including PLAG1[11], whose knockout in mice causes dwarfism in the absence of other symptoms [12]. The CW-1 QTL that we narrowed down [2] locates approximately 2.5-Mb apart from the variations on RPS20 or PLAG1-CHCHD7.

Here, a GWAS for carcass weight was performed using 1156 Japanese Black steers that were selected preferentially from the tails of the carcass weight distribution of more than 27,500 steers. The strongest association was obtained on BTA14, but not within the CW-1 region. The GWAS led us to re-examine the CW-1 QTL and identify the PLAG1-CHCHD7 QTN for stature [11] in Japanese Black cattle.


GWAS identified three major QTL in Japanese Black

A GWAS was performed using 1156 DNA samples that were selected from more than 27,500 Japanese Black steers. The carcass weight of the selected samples had higher ratios of both extremes than in the collected samples, but was normally distributed (Additional file 1). The 39,011 SNP on autosomes that fulfilled the quality control criteria were used for the association analysis. The analysis was performed using EMMAX software [13], which is based on a linear mixed model approach using a genetic relationship matrix estimated by high-density SNP genotypes to model the correlation between the phenotypes of the sample subjects. The approach can adjust for both population stratification and relatedness between samples [14]. The genomic inflation factor (λGC) was 1.008 in this analysis, indicating that the adjustment of the sample structure of our samples was appropriate. The quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot with p < 10-3 revealed large deviations from the distribution under the null hypothesis, indicating that robust associations were obtained (Additional file 2). Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significant associations (p < 1.28 × 10-6) were obtained for 19 SNP on 3 chromosomes: 12 on BTA 6, 3 on BTA 8, and 4 on BTA 14 (Figure 1; Additional file 3).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Manhattan plot of GWAS for bovine carcass weight. We genotyped 1156 Japanese Black steers with the Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip. The association of SNP with carcass weight was analyzed by a variance component approach using EMMAX software [13] with adjustments for age, slaughterhouse, and year as covariates and fixed effects. Blue horizontal line, p = 1.28 × 10-6.

The strongest association was detected with Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 (p = 1.03 × 10-12) located at 23.5 Mb on BTA 14 (Btau4.0; Figure 2A; Table 1). This and three other significant SNP located from 23.5 to 26.2 Mb on BTA 14 were in moderate linkage disequilibrium (LD) with linkage disequilibrium coefficients (r2) ranging from 0.23 to 0.79. The second strongest association was obtained with Hapmap26308-BTC-057761 (p = 9.65 × 10-12) on BTA 6, which had 11 other significant SNP in the interval (Figure 2B; Table 1). Eleven SNP, including Hapmap26308-BTC-057761, located within 3.5 Mb from 35.7 to 39.2 Mb and were in strong LD with r2 ranging from 0.65 to 1.00. A residual SNP was 7.9 Mb from them, but in strong LD with the 11 SNP (r2 = 0.62-0.73). An extended LD of this region was also observed in a previous study [3], which is probably due to a specific (local) lineage of the Q allele. On BTA 8, 3 SNP locating from 88.7 Mb to 89.4 Mb reached genome-wide significance (Figure 2C). The most significant SNP was BTA-52694-no-rs (p = 4.24 x 10-9; Table 1). In this case, the LD among the 3 SNP was relatively weak with r2 ranging from 0.14 to 0.35.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Conditioned analyses. To examine whether the associations detected on a chromosome were independent, a conditioned analysis was performed by including a genotype of the most significant SNP on the chromosome as a covariate in the model. Red and blue dots represent p values in –log10 scale before and after conditioning, respectively. Large squares indicate the most significant SNP in the respective chromosomes. (A) BTA 14. (B) BTA 6. (C1) BTA 8. In BTA 8, Hapmap40466-BTA-82123 reached nearly genome-wide significance with conditioning on BTA-52694-no-rs (C1), while the association of BTA-52694-no-r became stronger with conditioning on Hapmap40466-BTA-8212 (C2, green dots). When conditioned on both SNP, associations of the surrounding SNP disappeared (C3, orange dots).

Table 1

Summary of the SNP and haplotypes associated with carcass weight


SNP or Haplotype


Position (Btau4.0)

Allele substitution effect (kg)


Q allele

q allele

Q frequency





























NCAPG c.1326T > G









Hapmap40466-BTA-82123 and BTA-52694-no-rs

















1)A, SNP on the BovineSNP50 BeadChip that showed the strongest association on a chromosome.

1)B, Critical SNP or a haplotype in the associated regions.

We then performed conditioned analyses to examine the independence of the SNP associations. Genotypes of the most associated SNP on each chromosome, Hapmap26308-BTC-057761 on BTA 6, BTA-52694-no-rs on BTA 8, and Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 on BTA 14, were individually included as a covariate in the mixed model. After conditioning, the associations of the surrounding SNP disappeared (Figure 2A, B), indicating that a single QTL was present in the respective regions. In the case of BTA 8, the p value of Hapmap40466-BTA-82123 decreased from 0.216 to 1.31 × 10-6, a nearly genome-wide significance level, after conditioning on BTA-52694-no-rs, while BTA-52694-no-rs became much more significant (p = 2.17 × 10-14) after conditioning on Hapmap40466-BTA-82123. When conditioned on both BTA-52694-no-rs and Hapmap40466-BTA-82123, the associations of the surrounding SNP disappeared (Figure 2C). This result suggested that a certain haplotype comprising the two SNP represented the QTL on BTA 8 and that a SNP in strong LD with the causative variation of the QTL was not included in the BovineSNP50 BeadChip. When conditioned on the four SNP described above, the Q-Q plot did not deviate from the distribution under the null hypothesis, indicating that no other QTL were detected (Additional file 2).

In our half-sib analyses, we previously detected carcass weight QTL on BTA 14 (CW-1) [1, 2, 15, 16], BTA 6 (CW-2) [1, 3], and recently on BTA 8 (CW-3; Additional file 4). As for CW-2, the SNP encoding NCAPG Ile442Met has been identified as a candidate causative variation [3]. The SNP was located at 38.2 Mb and was in strong LD with Hapmap26308-BTC-057761 (r2 = 0.97), indicating that the observed association corresponded to CW-2 (Figure 2B; Table 1). On BTA 8, we detected a carcass weight QTL around 90 cM in two half-sib families (Additional file 4), whose sires are father and son and shared a superior Q haplotype (data not shown). Because the Q haplotype of the sires had an A-allele for BTA-52694-no-rs and a C-allele for Hapmap40466-BTA-82123, the haplotypes comprising the two SNP were estimated for the GWAS samples and the association of the Q haplotype was examined (Table 1). The Q haplotype was highly associated with carcass weight (p = 8.13 × 10-13), indicating that the association detected on BTA 8 corresponded to CW-3. In contrast, the 1.1-Mb critical region for CW-1[2] was 2.3-Mb telomeric from the most strongly associated SNP on BTA 14 in the GWAS. The details are discussed below.

LD mapping led to a revision of a CW-1 critical region

The CW-1 QTL was originally mapped between BMS1941 and INRA094 (24.7-30.9 Mb on Btau4.0) using a Japanese Black half-sib family [15], and narrowed down between DIK7012 and DIK7020 (25.8-26.7 Mb on Btau4.0) by LD mapping [2]. A subsequent haplotype analysis showed that the six sires segregating a carcass weight QTL around the CW-1 locus shared the same Q haplotype between DIK7013 and NRKM-040 (26.0-26.7 Mb on Btau4.0) with the CW-1-segregating sire [1], indicating that all seven sires harbored the CW-1 QTL. The fact that many sires harbored the CW-1 QTL suggested that the QTL was prevalant in the Japanese Black population. Despite this, the most significant SNP on BTA 14 in the GWAS (Hapmap46986-BTA-3428 at 23.5 Mb on Btau4.0) was slightly outside of the confidence interval (CI) of CW-1 and the conditioned analysis of the GWAS showed only one significant QTL on BTA 14. Thus, we performed haplotype analysis and LD mapping using high-density microsatellites developed around Hapmap46986-BTA-34282, to examine if the observed association was derived from CW-1, and if so, which location CW-1 lies in. Haplotypes were examined using the three sires that segregated the CW-1 QTL and harbored the same Q but different q (inferior) haplotypes between DIK7013 and NRKM-040[1]. All three sires shared the same Q haplotype spanning more than 1.1 Mb around Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 (Additional file 5). Therefore, the two identity-by-state (IBS) regions located 2.4-Mb apart on the Q haplotypes of the CW-1-segregating sires, which implied that the observed association was consistent with CW-1. The sires also shared the same q alleles at the two consecutive microsatellites close to Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 (Additional file 5).

Linkage disequilibrium mapping was performed using 142 cattle with heavy carcass weight and 145 cattle with light carcass weight that were selected from the GWAS samples and did not include half-sibs in either group. Also, in the selected samples, Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 had the strongest association on BTA 14 (Figure 3upper). The frequency of haplotypes comprising two contiguous microsatellites was estimated in each group and the difference in haplotype frequencies between the groups was tested by Fisher’s exact test using 2xn or 2x2 contingency tables (Figure 3middle). A stronger association was detected around Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 than the previously identified CW-1 region in both tests using 2xn and 2x2 contingency tables, respectively, indicating that CW-1 did not locate within the previously identified region, but located between DIK7104 and DIK7113 (22.8-23.7 Mb on Btau4.0; 24.6-25.4 Mb on UMD3.0). The revised CW-1 region included both RPS20 and PLAG1-CHCHD7, which were previously identified as a locus for body size [9] and stature [11], respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Linkage disequilibrium mapping of CW-1 and association analysis of the candidate QTN screened by targeted resequencing. Of the 1156 steers used for GWAS, 142 with heavy carcass weight and 145 with light carcass weight were used. Also in this population, Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 was the most associated on BTA 14 (upper panel). Linkage disequilibrium mapping was performed using high-density microsatellites around Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 and the previously identified CW-1 region. A haplotype frequency with two contiguous microsatellites was estimated using an expectation-maximization algorithm in each group and differences in haplotype frequencies between the groups were tested by Fisher’s exact test using a 2xn or a 2x2 contingency table (middle panel). The frequency of the q3 haplotype was very low (< 6 alleles in both groups) in some regions, in which the association of the haplotype was not tested. Targeted resequencing was performed on the revised CW-1 region. Candidate QTN were obtained as described in the text. An association of candidate QTN with carcass weight was examined using EMMAX software [13] (lower panel).

CW-1 is identical to the QTN for bovine stature

To identify the causative variation of CW-1, targeted resequencing was performed. The three sires segregating the CW-1 QTL, three Q-homozygous sires, and a q-homozygous steer were subjected to sequence capture using a NimbleGen custom array followed by resequencing using Illumina GAIIx (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The Q-homozygous sires were determined as those with at least one Q haplotype within the revised CW-1 region and homozygous Q alleles at Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 (Additional file 5), and did not segregate a carcass weight QTL on BTA 14 in the half-sib analyses using more than 255 offspring per family. The respective GAIIx-reads (40-bp paired-ends) were aligned against both Btau4.0 and UMD3.1 as reference genome sequences, because UMD3.1 includes the largest number of gene annotations among the existing bovine genome assemblies, while information about sequence conservation across species is available on Btau4.0 [17]. The mean sequence depth of the targeted region was estimated to be 26 to 59 per animal. On UMD3.1, 711 to 1309 putative sequence variations were identified in the CW-1-heterozygous sires. The obtained putative sequence variations were filtered by: (1) heterozygous in the three sires segregating the CW-1 QTL, (2) homozygous in the three Q- and the q-homozygous animals, and (3) opposite alleles between the Q- and the q-homozygous animals, resulting in 211 candidate QTN (197 SNP and 14 Indel) on UMD3.1. There were 4 exonic variations, including 1 non-synonymous SNP, while 1 synonymous SNP and 5 SNP in the intergenic regions were within highly conserved segments in mammals (PhastCons score >0.9 on Btau4.0 [17]). We checked the sequence coverage of the coding regions and the highly conserved regions and confirmed that no other candidate QTN was present in them except for the PLAG1 CHCHD7 intergenic region (see Methods). The same variations (1 SNP and 1 variable number of tandem repeat) as those identified by Karim et al. [11] were detected in the PLAG1 CHCHD7 intergenic region of the CW-1 heterozygous sires, while the SNP in a putative polyadenylation signal of RPS20[9] was homozygous in one of the CW-1 heterozygous sires (Sire J in Additional file 5). Thus, a total of 11 sequence variations were examined for an association with carcass weight (Figure 3lower; Additional file 6). The strongest association was obtained for the variations between PLAG1 and CHCHD7, strongly suggesting that CW-1 was identical to the QTL for bovine stature identified by Karim et al. [11].

We compared haplotypes around the QTN for bovine stature between the Japanese Black sires and the F1 (Holstein x Jersey) sires reported by Karim et al. [11]. The Q haplotype of the Japanese Black sires had a mosaic structure of the Q and q haplotypes of the F1 sires, and shared the same Q alleles only at the QTN for stature, FJX_PLAPROTRI and FJX_PLAPROSNP (Additional file 7). This observation strongly supports the idea that a crossbreed comparison is a useful way to pinpoint the causative variation for a QTL in bovine [3] as well as in canine [18].

The three major QTL accounted for one-third of the total genetic variance

Allele frequencies and effect size of the three QTL were examined using FJX_PLAPROTRI (CW-1), NCAPG c.1326T > G (CW-2), and a haplotype comprising Hapmap40466-BTA-82123 and BTA-52694-no-rs (CW-3) (Table 1). The Q allele frequency was high for CW-1 (75.4%), but low for CW-2 (20.0%) and CW-3 (11.5%), while allele substitution effects of CW-2 and CW-3 (35.3 and 35.0 kg/allele) were larger than that of CW-1 (28.4 kg/allele). Thus, CW-2 and CW-3 can be used to efficiently increase carcass weight in the Japanese Black population.

The fraction of phenotypic variance explained by the empirically estimated relatedness matrix is calculated in EMMAX as pseudoheritability: h 2 = σ a 2 / σ a 2 + σ e 2 . The value was 0.636 and decreased to 0.423 after conditioning on the 3 QTL (FJX_PLAPROTRI, NCAPG c.1326T > G and a haplotype comprising BTA-52694-no-rs and Hapmap40466-BTA-82123), suggesting that the 3 QTL account for one-third [=(0.636-0.423)/0.636] of the total genetic variance of the GWAS samples.


We detected three major QTL for carcass weight in a GWAS using Japanese Black cattle. Although these QTL were previously detected using microsatellite-based mapping in half-sib families, the allele frequencies and allele substitution effects of the QTL could be compared in the GWAS. Importantly, these three QTL alone accounted for approximately one-third of the genetic variance. Such information will be useful for marker-assisted selection.

The GWAS using a large population unexpectedly led us to revise the location of CW-1. The QTL mapping [15] was originally performed when only a medium-density linkage map was available. The limited number of microsatellites used for the fine-mapping may have caused the incorrect CI. The CI was 10.7 cM, while marker intervals around the QTL region were approximately 8.3 cM [15]. Once the CI was incorrectly assigned, an IBS region existing in the CI showed the strongest association in the following LD mapping population, and was assigned as a critical region [2]. To avoid the error, the fine-mapping should have been performed using high-density markers that were evenly distributed along the chromosome, as Karim et al. did [11]. They used 56 microsatellites in the fine-mapping, whose marker-density was more than 3 times the density of ours [15].

Re-examination of CW-1 strongly suggested that it was identical to the causative variations for bovine stature that were identified by Karim et al. [11]. In their study, the QTL accompanied an effect on weight but not on the ratio of live weight to height [11], suggesting that the primary effect of CW-1 may be on height as observed in CW-2[8].

In both CW-1[11] and CW-2[3, 8], the same QTL mutations were shared among the historically and geographically distant breeds. To our knowledge, there is no documentation of a crossing between a European breed and an ancestor of the Japanese Black sires used in these studies. In CW-1, the Q haplotype of Japanese Black (Additional file 7) resembled a Simmental haplotype [11]. A close relationship has not been detected, however, between Japanese Black and a European breed, even using more than 2000 genome-wide SNP [19]. A genome-wide analysis of haplotypes using much higher-density SNP might reveal shared genomic fragments between the Japanese Black and a European breed, and a cryptic genomic influence from a certain breed. Although the origins of the QTN are unknown, it is important that the causative variations are shared among breeds at some QTL. A crossbreed comparison will be able to pinpoint the causative variation if it is shared.

The CW-1 orthologous region in humans has been identified as one of the loci associated with adult height [7, 10]. The CW-2 also corresponds to another height locus, NCAPG-LCORL[3, 8]. Pryce et al. [20] suggested the consistency between the loci for bovine stature and the loci for human adult height. Therefore CW-3 may correspond to another height locus as well. The CW-3 region includes many height-associated genes such as C9orf64 ZCCHC6 SPIN1, IPPK, PTPDC1, PTCH1/FANCC, ZNF462, and LPAR[21]. Targeted resequencing of the CW-3 region will be useful to screen the candidate causative variations, as shown in this study.

So far, 180 loci have been detected that are associated with human adult height but they account for only 10% of the phenotypic variance [21]. Because heritability is estimated to account for more than 80% of the height variance [22], a large fraction of heritability has not been detected. In contrast, only six loci account for more than 70% of the variance in stature across domestic dog breeds [23]. Many of the loci are among the highest FST regions in the dog genome, suggesting that the simple genetic architecture resulted from diversifying selection among breeds for body size [23]. Under artificial selection, a QTL with a large effect such as CW-1 CW2, and CW 3, may be easily fixed. Previous reports showed that the Q frequencies of the stature QTL (CW-1) and NCAPG c.1326T > G (CW-2) differed substantially in P0 animals between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey [11] and between Charolais and German Holstein [24], respectively. In contrast, Japanese Black has three QTL at different frequencies. In Japanese Black, mean carcass weight was recently improved, while a line with a relatively small body size remains locally. This may explain the wide distribution of carcass weight in this breed (Additional file 1; 300–700 kg) and the presence of the three QTL with large effects. The line is known to produce highly marbled beef, but the Q alleles of the three QTL were not significantly associated with marbling (p >0.01). Therefore, the small carcass weight of the line can be improved by selection (CW-1) or introgression of the Q alleles (CW-2 and CW-3) without affecting marbling. This study revealed a genetic architecture underlying carcass weight variations in Japanese Black cattle and provides useful information for breeding.


Genome-wide association analysis of Japanese Black cattle identified three major QTL for carcass weight. A detailed examination of the association on BTA 14 led to a revision of the CW-1 region and strongly suggested that it was identical to the causative variations in the PLAG1-CHCHD7 intergenic region for bovine stature [11]. The three QTL with various frequencies accounted for approximately one-third of the total heritability, indicating a possibility of efficiently increasing carcass weight using marker-assisted selection.


Ethics statement

This research was undertaken with the approval of the Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics Committee on Animal Research (H21-1).

Collection of DNA samples and phenotype data

Perirenal fat tissues of more than 27,500 Japanese Black steers were collected at two slaughterhouses from 2000 to 2008. The cattle were reared in different herds throughout Japan. Carcass traits such as cold carcass weight and marbling were systematically measured by certified graders and recorded at slaughterhouses. Sire DNA used to analyze the CW-1 region was obtained as semen.

Selection of DNA samples for GWAS

First, animals were selected from the 15% extremes of the cold carcass weight distribution that did not include a half-sib in each extreme, resulting in 199 steers for heavy carcass weight and 299 steers for light carcass weight. Then, 658 steers that had been selected from both extremes for marbling and genotyped using the BovineSNP50 BeadChip (Illumina) were added to increase the sample numbers. The 658 steers included half-sibs and distributed from heavy to light carcass weight. The resulting population comprised 1156 steers with a normally distributed carcass weight (Additional file 1). The 1156 steers were the offspring of 347 sires and included at most 20 half-sibs.

GWAS for carcass weight

The 1156 DNA samples were genotyped using the BovineSNP50 BeadChip (Illumina). The Btau4.0 assembly [25] was used to map the position of the SNP. Genotyping call rates were more than 95% in all samples. Among 54,001 SNP on the BovineSNP50 BeadChip, 39,011 SNP on autosomes fulfilled our quality control criteria: (1) call rate greater than 95%, (2) minor allele frequency greater than 0.01, and (3) p-value of a chi-square test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium greater than 0.001.

An association analysis was performed using EMMAX software [13] based on a linear mixed model with genomic related matrix. This software performs three-step analysis. First, the n × n genetic relatedness matrix of IBS between individuals is calculated using high-density SNP genotype data. Second, it uses a variance component model to estimate the restricted maximum likelihood parameters.
V a r Y = σ a 2 S ^ N + σ e 2 I

where Var(Y) is the variance of phenotype, σ a 2 is the additive genetic variance, S ^ N is the n × n normalized genetic relatedness matrix, σ e 2 is random environmental variance, and I is an identity matrix.

Third, a generalized least squares F-test for each marker was performed to detect associations accounting for the sample structure using the genetic relatedness matrix
y i = β 0 + β k X ik + η i V a r η = V σ a ^ 2 S ^ N + σ e ^ 2 I

where y i is the phenotypic value of an individual i β 0 is the fixed effect composed of age (month), slaughter year, and slaughterhouse to adjust the environmental effect, β k is the effect size of marker k X ik is the minor allele counts of marker k of individual i, and ηi is the error term that includes the genetic relatedness matrix. In a conditioned analysis, the genotypes of SNP associated with carcass weight were included as covariates. Haploview [26] was used to analyze LD among the SNP.

QTL mapping of CW-3

The genome screen was conducted using the microsatellite markers on the Shirakawa-USDA linkage map [27]. QTL analyses were performed with the interval mapping method using a linear regression model for half-sib families [28, 29], as described previously [15]. Linear regression analysis was performed using the following model:
y = X b + e ,

where y is the vector of phenotypic value, X is the design matrix of fixed effects composed of slaughter year, age (day), and probability of having the Q phase at a given location (Prob(Q)), b is the vector of fixed effects, and e is the residual error. b was estimated by the least squares method. An F-statistic value at each position was calculated from the residual sum square regressed with Prob(Q), and the total residual sum square without Prob(Q). The analysis was performed at 2-cM intervals along each chromosome. A threshold for significance of the F-statistic value was obtained by 10,000 random permutations of the phenotypic data [30]. The 95% CI of the QTL locations was calculated using the bootstrapping method [31]. Briefly, a set of offspring was chosen so as to be the same number as the original half-sibs by resampling from the original half-sibs. Resampling was repeated 10,000 times. The position of the F-statistic peak in each bootstrapping was collected. The CI was determined based on the distribution of the peaks. Therefore, the CI may be fragmented into separated regions, and not a single contiguous region.

The sires and a Q-homozygous steer were genotyped using a BovineHD BeadChip (Illumina) that includes BTA-52694-no-rs. The SNP Hapmap40466-BTA-82123 was genotyped by direct sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) followed by electrophoresis using an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Microsatellite development and genotyping

Microsatellites were searched for in the genomic sequences and the primers were designed using Primer 3 [32]. Seventeen microsatellite markers from DIK7100 to DIK7116 were developed in this study. Marker information, such as primer sequences and genomic positions, is shown in Additional file 5. Genotyping was performed using PCR with a fluorescent-labeled reverse primer, followed by electrophoresis using ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and analysis using GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). The sires and their offspring were genotyped to determine the phase of the sires’ chromosomes. The haplotypes of the animals used for targeted resequencing are also shown in Additional file 5.

Linkage disequilibrium mapping

Linkage disequilibrium mapping was performed using 142 heavy carcass weight cattle and 145 light carcass weight cattle that were selected from the GWAS samples and did not include half-sibs in each group. A haplotype frequency comprising two contiguous microsatellites was estimated using an expectation-maximization algorithm in each group and the difference in haplotype frequencies between the groups was tested by Fisher’s exact test using a 2xn contingency table. The association of each haplotype of the three sires segregating the CW-1 QTL was also tested by Fisher’s exact test using a 2x2 contingency table. The frequency of q3 haplotypeAdditional file ( 5) was very low (< 6 alleles in both groups) in some regions, where an association of the haplotype was not tested.

Targeted resequencing

Three sires segregating the QTL, three Q-homozygous sires, and a q-homozygous steer (Additional file 5) were subjected to sequence capture (NimbleGen custom array) followed by resequencing (Illumina GAIIx, 40-bp paired-end run). The Q-homozygous sires were determined as those that harbored at least one Q haplotype and homozygous Q alleles at Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 and did not segregate a carcass weight QTL on BTA 14 in the half-sib analyses using more than 255 offspring per family. The revised CW-1 region including 22.8-23.7 Mb on Btau4.0 and 24.5-25.5 Mb on UMD3.0 was targeted. Alignment and variant detection were performed using Illumina pipeline (CASAVA 1.7). As a reference genome assembly, UMD3.1 was used to identify variants in coding regions, while Btau4.0 was used to search variants in conserved segments across mammalian species. PhastCons scores were downloaded from the University of California, Santa Cruz web site [17]. Obtained putative sequence variations were filtered by: (1) heterozygous in the three sires segregating the CW-1 QTL, (2) homozygous in the three Q- and the q-homozygous animals, and (3) opposite alleles between the Q- and the q-homozygous animals.

Coverage of the coding regions (UMD3.1) and highly conserved regions (PhastCons > 0.9, Btau4.0) was checked in each animal. The region between PLAG1 and CHCHD7 was not covered in every animal. Although the region was difficult to amplify by PCR, we detected the variations in heterozygous sires reported by Karim et al. [11]. Ten nucleotides in the 3’UTR of TMEM68 were not covered only in the q-homozygous animal and were sequenced using an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Other coding regions and highly conserved regions were covered in every animal. Regions with fewer than 4 reads in either of the animals were confirmed to have no sequence variations between the q-homozygous and a Q-homozygous animal.

Association analysis of candidate QTN with bovine carcass weight

Sequence variations were genotyped using the same population used for the LD mapping. The SNP were genotyped by direct sequencing of the PCR products, while the Indel and variable number of tandem repeat were amplified using a fluorescent-labeled reverse primer and genotyped in the same way as a microsatellite marker. The information, such as genomic positions, primer sequences, and alleles, is shown in Additional file 6. The genotypes were combined with the genotypes determined using a Bovine SNP50 BeadChip. Mixed-model association analysis was performed using EMMAX [13], adjusting for age, slaughterhouse, and year as covariate and fixed effects.

Estimation of effect size of the QTL

Genotypes of FJX_PLAPROTRI and NCAPG c.1326T > G, and a Q haplotype comprising Hapmap40466-BTA-82123 and BTA-52694-no-rs were used to estimate the effect size of CW-1 CW 2, and CW 3, respectively. The 1156 GWAS samples were genotyped with FJX_PLAPROTRI (Additional file 6) and NCAPG c.1326T > G [3]. A Q haplotype of CW-3 was determined using the sires segregating the QTL (Additional file 5) and diplotypes of the GWAS samples were estimated using fastPhase [33]. The calculation was performed using EMMAX including a number of the Q alleles or haplotypes (0, 1, and 2) as X ik in the model.




Quantitative trait locus or loci


Genome-wide association study


Bovine chromosome(s)


Single nucleotide polymorphism(s)


Quantitative trait nucleotide(s)


Linkage disequilibrium






Confidence interval


Polymerase chain reaction.



The authors thank Y. Kaneuchi and M. Komatsu for technical assistance. The work was partly supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery, Japan, and by the Japan Racing and Livestock Promotion Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics, Japan Livestock Technology Association, Odakura, Nishigo, Fukushima 961-8061, Japan
Cattle Breeding Development Institute of Kagoshima Prefecture, Osumi, So, Kagoshima 899-8212, Japan
Hyogo Prefectural Institute of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries, Befu, Kasai, Hyogo 679-0198, Japan
Oita Prefectural Institute of Animal Industry, Kuju, Takeda, Oita 878-0201, Japan
National Livestock Breeding Center, Odakura, Nishigo, Fukushima 961-8511, Japan


  1. Takasuga A, Watanabe T, Mizoguchi Y, Hirano T, Ihara N, Takano A, Yokouchi K, Fujikawa A, Chiba K, Kobayashi N, Tatsuda K, Oe T, Furukawa-Kuroiwa M, Nishimura-Abe A, Fujita T, Inoue K, Mizoshita K, Ogino A, Sugimoto Y: Identification of bovine QTL for growth and carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle by replication and identical-by-descent mapping. Mamm Genome. 2007, 18: 125-136. 10.1007/s00335-006-0096-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mizoshita K, Takano A, Watanabe T, Takasuga A, Sugimoto Y: Identification of a 1.1-Mb region for a carcass weight QTL on bovine Chromosome 14. Mamm Genome. 2005, 16: 532-537. 10.1007/s00335-005-0024-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Setoguchi K, Furuta M, Hirano T, Nagao T, Watanabe T, Sugimoto Y, Takasuga A: Cross-breed comparisons identified a critical 591-kb region for bovine carcass weight QTL (CW-2) on chromosome 6 and the Ile-442-Met substitution in NCAPG as a positional candidate. BMC Genet. 2009, 4: 10-43.Google Scholar
  4. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP: Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One. 2009, 4: 1-13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005361.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Snelling WM, Allan MF, Keele JW, Kuehn LA, McDaneld T, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, Thallman RM, Bennett GL: Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2010, 88: 837-848. 10.2527/jas.2009-2257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Weedon MN, Lango H, Lindgren CM, Wallace C, Evans DM, Mangino M, Freathy RM, Perry JR, Stevens S, Hall AS, Samani NJ, Shields B, Prokopenko I, Farrall M, Dominiczak A, Johnson T, Bergmann S, Beckmann JS, Vollenweider P, Waterworth DM, Mooser V, Palmer CN, Morris AD, Ouwehand WH, Cambridge GEM Consortium, Zhao JH, Li S, Loos RJ, Diabetes Genetics Initiative; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, et al: Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 575-583. 10.1038/ng.121.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gudbjartsson DF, Walters GB, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Halldorsson BV, Zusmanovich P, Sulem P, Thorlacius S, Gylfason A, Steinberg S, Helgadottir A, Ingason A, Steinthorsdottir V, Olafsdottir EJ, Olafsdottir GH, Jonsson T, Borch-Johnsen K, Hansen T, Andersen G, Jorgensen T, Pedersen O, Aben KK, Witjes JA, Swinkels DW, den Heijer M, Franke B, Verbeek AL, Becker DM, Yanek LR, Becker LC, et al: Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 609-615. 10.1038/ng.122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Setoguchi K, Watanabe T, Weikard R, Albrecht E, Kühn C, Kinoshita A, Sugimoto Y, Takasuga A: The SNP c.1326T>G in the non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G (NCAPG) gene encoding a p.Ile442Met variant is associated with an increase in body frame size at puberty in cattle. Anim Genet. 2011, 42: 650-655. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02196.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pausch H, Flisikowski K, Jung S, Emmerling R, Edel C, Götz KU, Fries R: Genome-wide association study identifies two major loci affecting calving ease and growth-related traits in cattle. Genetics. 2011, 187: 289-297. 10.1534/genetics.110.124057.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lettre G, Jackson AU, Gieger C, Schumacher FR, Berndt SI, Sanna S, Eyheramendy S, Voight BF, Butler JL, Guiducci C, Illig T, Hackett R, Heid IM, Jacobs KB, Lyssenko V, Uda M, Boehnke M, Chanock SJ, Groop LC, Hu FB, Isomaa B, Kraft P, Peltonen L, Salomaa V, Diabetes Genetics Initiative; FUSION; KORA; Prostate, Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial; Nurses' Health Study; SardiNIA, et al: Identification of ten loci associated with height highlights new biological pathways in human growth. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 584-591. 10.1038/ng.125.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Karim L, Takeda H, Lin L, Druet T, Arias JA, Baurain D, Cambisano N, Davis SR, Farnir F, Grisart B, Harris BL, Keehan MD, Littlejohn MD, Spelman RJ, Georges M, Coppieters W: Variants modulating the expression of a chromosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine stature. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 405-413. 10.1038/ng.814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hensen K, Braem C, Declercq J, Van Dyck F, Dewerchin M, Fiette L, Denef C, Van de Ven WJ: Targeted disruption of the murine Plag1 proto-oncogene causes growth retardation and reduced fertility. Dev Growth Differ. 2004, 46: 459-470. 10.1111/j.1440-169x.2004.00762.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK, Zaitlen NA, Kong SY, Freimer NB, Sabatti C, Eskin E: Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 348-354. 10.1038/ng.548.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Price AL, Zaitlen NA, Reich D, Patterson N: New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2010, 11: 459-463.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mizoshita K, Watanabe T, Hayashi H, Kubota C, Yamakuchi H, Todoroki J, Sugimoto Y: Quantitative trait loci analysis for growth and carcass traits in a half-sib family of purebred Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle. J Anim Sci. 2004, 82: 3415-3420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mizoguchi Y, Watanabe T, Fujinaka K, Iwamoto E, Sugimoto Y: Mapping of quantitative trait loci for carcass traits in a Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle population. Anim Genet. 2006, 37: 51-54. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01367.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. ,: Human (Homo sapiens) Genome Browser Gateway. 2012, []
  18. Karlsson EK, Baranowska I, Wade CM, Salmon Hillbertz NH, Zody MC, Anderson N, Biagi TM, Patterson N, Pielberg GR, Kulbokas EJ, Comstock KE, Keller ET, Mesirov JP, von Euler H, Kämpe O, Hedhammar A, Lander ES, Andersson G, Andersson L, Lindblad-Toh K: Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1321-1328. 10.1038/ng.2007.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, Crews D, Neto ED, Gill CA, Gao C, Mannen H, Wang Z, Van Tassell CP, Williams JL, Taylor JF, Moore SS: An assessment of population structure in eight breeds of cattle using a whole genome SNP panel. BMC Genet. 2008, 9: 37-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Bolormaa S, Goddard ME: Polymorphic regions affecting human height also control stature in cattle. Genetics. 2011, 187: 981-984. 10.1534/genetics.110.123943.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lango Allen H, Estrada K, Lettre G, Berndt SI, Weedon MN, Rivadeneira F, Willer CJ, Jackson AU, Vedantam S, Raychaudhuri S, Ferreira T, Wood AR, Weyant RJ, Segrè AV, Speliotes EK, Wheeler E, Soranzo N, Park JH, Yang J, Gudbjartsson D, Heard-Costa NL, Randall JC, Qi L, Vernon Smith A, Mägi R, Pastinen T, Liang L, Heid IM, Luan J, Thorleifsson G, et al: Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature. 2010, 467: 832-838. 10.1038/nature09410.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MA, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG: Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2: e41-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Boyko AR, Quignon P, Li L, Schoenebeck JJ, Degenhardt JD, Lohmueller KE, Zhao K, Brisbin A, Parker HG, von Holdt BM, Cargill M, Auton A, Reynolds A, Elkahloun AG, Castelhano M, Mosher DS, Sutter NB, Johnson GS, Novembre J, Hubisz MJ, Siepel A, Wayne RK, Bustamante CD, Ostrander EA: A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8: e1000451-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000451.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Eberlein A, Takasuga A, Setoguchi K, Pfuhl R, Flisikowski K, Fries R, Klopp N, Fürbass R, Weikard R, Kühn C: Dissection of Genetic Factors Modulating Fetal Growth in Cattle Indicates a Substantial Role of the Non-SMC Condensin I Complex, Subunit G (NCAPG) Gene. Genetics. 2009, 183: 951-964. 10.1534/genetics.109.106476.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Baylor College of Medicine, Human Genome Sequencing Center: []
  26. Haploview | Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard: []
  27. Ihara N, Takasuga A, Mizoshita K, Takeda H, Sugimoto M, Mizoguchi Y, Hirano T, Itoh T, Watanabe T, Reed KM, Snelling WM, Kappes SM, Beattie CW, Bennett GL, Sugimoto Y: A comprehensive genetic map of the cattle genome based on 3802 microsatellites. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1987-1998. 10.1101/gr.2741704.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Knott SA, Marklund L, Haley CS, Andersson K, Davies W, Ellegren H, Fredholm M, Hansson I, Hoyheim B, Lundström K, Moller M, Andersson L: Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and large white pigs. Genetics. 1998, 149: 1069-1080.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seaton G, Haley CS, Knott SA, Kearsey M, Visscher PM: QTL Express: mapping quantitative trait loci in simple and complex pedigrees. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18: 339-340. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Churchill GA, Doerge RW: Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994, 138: 963-971.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Visscher PM, Thompson R, Haley CS: Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping. Genetics. 1996, 143: 1013-1020.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Primer3 Input (version 0.4.0). []
  33. fastPHASE - Assets - Express Licenses - UW Center for Commercialization (C4C): []


© Nishimura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.