Skip to main content

Table 2 Power of QTL identification

From: Multiple trait multiple interval mapping of quantitative trait loci from inbred line crosses

Analysis

 

SI

SII

SIII

(trait)

QTL

1%

5%

10%

1%

5%

10%

1%

5%

10%

 

Q1

66.8

82.0

86.6

65.8

80.2

84.2

67.6

77.2

79.6

MIM

Q2

63.6

81.8

87.6

59.8

78.2

81.8

–

–

–

(T1)

Q3

67.4

81.6

87.2

63.2

81.2

85.8

75.2

87.0

90.2

 

Q4

66.4

81.8

87.0

63.4

78.4

83.4

–

–

–

 

Q5

66.8

83.6

86.4

65.6

82.0

87.2

70.2

78.4

81.6

 

Q1

64.8

80.0

88.2

–

–

–

–

–

–

MIM

Q2

64.8

80.0

84.8

74.4

85.4

89.8

64.2

74.2

76.4

(T2)

Q3

65.6

79.8

83.4

76.4

86.0

90.0

76.4

88.4

91.2

 

Q4

66.0

82.4

87.0

77.4

87.6

92.0

74.6

86.0

88.0

 

Q5

68.4

83.0

88.8

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

Q1

65.6

81.4

86.0

–

–

–

–

–

–

MIM

Q2

63.2

80.0

86.6

–

–

–

–

–

–

(T3)

Q3

65.6

80.4

84.0

53.4

70.6

77.8

–

–

–

 

Q4

65.4

80.8

87.8

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

Q5

65.4

83.0

88.6

–

–

–

–

–

–

 

Q1

98.8

99.4

99.4

53.8

71.0

78.2

65.4

65.2

70.0

MTMIM

Q2

98.0

98.0

98.2

89.0

94.4

95.6

64.6

66.6

68.0

 

Q3

97.0

97.4

97.4

96.6

97.0

97.2

94.4

96.4

97.0

 

Q4

98.4

98.8

99.0

87.6

93.2

94.6

74.8

77.4

78.2

 

Q5

98.6

98.6

98.6

57.2

71.8

78.4

65.6

66.2

68.0

  1. Power (%) of QTL identification in the MIM and MTMIM models as observed in scenarios SI, SII and SIII across genome-wide significance levels (1, 5, and 10%) and LOD-1.5 support interval.