Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Pairwise FST values between all populations (lower-left matrix) and their significance (upper-right matrix)

From: Microsatellites reveal a strong subdivision of genetic structure in Chinese populations of the mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)

population 1(R) 2(R) 3(R) 6(R) 7(R) 8(R) 9(R) 10(R) 11(R) 12(R) 13(R) 14(R) 15(R) 16(R) 17(R) 18(R) 19(R) 20(R) 1(G) 4(G) 5(G) 6(G) 8(G) 11(G)
1(R)   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2(R) 0.707 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3(R) 0.635 0.685 * * * * * * NS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
6(R) 0.624 0.681 0.214 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
7(R) 0.597 0.616 0.159 0.153 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
8(R) 0.563 0.646 0.179 0.054 0.146 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9(R) 0.658 0.717 0.352 0.316 0.378 0.306 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
10(R) 0.467 0.547 0.121 0.108 0.115 0.071 0.269 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
11(R) 0.593 0.649 0.042 0.143 0.111 0.101 0.303 0.101 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
12(R) 0.622 0.649 0.544 0.539 0.505 0.483 0.576 0.359 0.520 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
13(R) 0.398 0.521 0.210 0.158 0.189 0.142 0.266 0.063 0.188 0.354 * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
14(R) 0.629 0.630 0.541 0.527 0.497 0.477 0.575 0.356 0.515 0.134 0.350 * * * * * * * * * * * * *
15(R) 0.517 0.532 0.409 0.415 0.361 0.358 0.454 0.247 0.381 0.179 0.235 0.205 * * * * * * * * * * * *
16(R) 0.736 0.757 0.649 0.680 0.630 0.628 0.702 0.488 0.622 0.486 0.497 0.566 0.415 * * * * * * * * * * *
17(R) 0.410 0.365 0.238 0.261 0.210 0.211 0.318 0.097 0.212 0.255 0.118 0.245 0.138 0.314 * * * * * * * * * *
18(R) 0.687 0.688 0.607 0.636 0.587 0.585 0.658 0.443 0.579 0.447 0.461 0.527 0.381 0.076 0.264 * * * * * * * * *
19(R) 0.597 0.598 0.439 0.497 0.427 0.447 0.516 0.296 0.414 0.439 0.332 0.468 0.321 0.347 0.186 0.317 * * * * * * * *
20(R) 0.640 0.646 0.588 0.581 0.551 0.522 0.612 0.387 0.553 0.406 0.403 0.426 0.301 0.412 0.241 0.358 0.292 * * * * * * *
1(G) 0.610 0.627 0.568 0.560 0.534 0.506 0.559 0.381 0.545 0.431 0.387 0.433 0.336 0.520 0.276 0.482 0.412 0.358 * * * * * *
4(G) 0.664 0.664 0.621 0.601 0.580 0.559 0.605 0.444 0.592 0.538 0.437 0.544 0.442 0.634 0.346 0.572 0.481 0.513 0.283 * * * * *
5(G) 0.761 0.749 0.710 0.684 0.665 0.641 0.694 0.530 0.681 0.609 0.532 0.613 0.507 0.705 0.425 0.624 0.571 0.554 0.287 0.417 * * * *
6(G) 0.662 0.628 0.597 0.582 0.547 0.538 0.610 0.433 0.564 0.535 0.429 0.531 0.427 0.626 0.327 0.569 0.459 0.493 0.291 0.283 0.373 * * *
8(G) 0.769 0.785 0.715 0.696 0.680 0.657 0.718 0.545 0.685 0.609 0.539 0.625 0.546 0.754 0.482 0.684 0.619 0.618 0.557 0.504 0.666 0.510 * *
11(G) 0.762 0.749 0.708 0.686 0.663 0.639 0.694 0.533 0.679 0.595 0.532 0.596 0.490 0.727 0.434 0.669 0.590 0.530 0.336 0.464 0.558 0.569 0.747 *
21(G) 0.708 0.738 0.656 0.640 0.628 0.592 0.657 0.461 0.631 0.516 0.473 0.535 0.449 0.633 0.390 0.575 0.512 0.483 0.301 0.405 0.549 0.478 0.623 0.503
  1. * P < 0.05 after sequential Bonferroni correction; NS, nonsignificant population differentiation