- Research article
- Open Access
Identification of Lens culinaris defense genes responsive to the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum
© Bhadauria et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 February 2013
Accepted: 12 April 2013
Published: 30 April 2013
Anthracnose of lentil, caused by the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum is a serious threat to lentil production in western Canada. Colletotrichum truncatum employs a bi-phasic infection strategy characterized by initial symptomless biotrophic and subsequent destructive necrotrophic colonization of its host. The transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy (known as the biotrophy-necrotrophy switch [BNS]) is critical in anthracnose development. Understanding plant responses during the BNS is the key to designing a strategy for incorporating resistance against hemibiotrophic pathogens either via introgression of resistance genes or quantitative trait loci contributing to host defense into elite cultivars, or via incorporation of resistance by biotechnological means.
The in planta BNS of C. truncatum was determined by histochemical analysis of infected lentil leaf tissues in time-course experiments. A total of 2852 lentil expressed sequence tags (ESTs) derived from C. truncatum-infected leaf tissues were analyzed to catalogue defense related genes. These ESTs could be assembled into 1682 unigenes. Of these, 101 unigenes encoded membrane and transport associated proteins, 159 encoded proteins implicated in signal transduction and 387 were predicted to be stress and defense related proteins (GenBank accessions: JG293480 to JG293479). The most abundant class of defense related proteins contained pathogenesis related proteins (encoded by 125 ESTs) followed by heat shock proteins, glutathione S-transferase, protein kinases, protein phosphatase, zinc finger proteins, peroxidase, GTP binding proteins, resistance proteins and syringolide-induced proteins. Quantitative RT-PCR was conducted to compare the expression of two resistance genes of the NBS-LRR class in susceptible and partially resistant genotypes. One (contig186) was induced 6 days post-inoculation (dpi) in a susceptible host genotype (Eston) whereas the mRNA level of another ( LT21-1990) peaked 4 dpi in a partially resistant host genotype (Robin), suggesting roles in conditioning the susceptibility and conferring tolerance to the pathogen, respectively.
Data obtained in this study suggest that lentil cells recognize C. truncatum at the BNS and in response, mount an inducible defense as evident by a high number of transcripts (23% of the total pathogen-responsive lentil transcriptome) encoding defense related proteins. Temporal expression polymorphism of defense related genes could be used to distinguish the response of a lentil genotype as susceptible or resistant.
Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus and W.D. Moore is the causative agent of anthracnose in legume species, including lentil (L. culinaris Medik.) . This fungal pathogen uses sequential biotrophic- and necrotrophic- infection strategies to invade and colonize the plant hosts. Transition from the asymptomatic biotrophic phase (characterized by intracellular thick primary hyphae) to a destructive necrotrophic phase (characterized by thin filamentous secondary hyphae) referred to as the biotrophy-necrotrophy switch (BNS), is essential for anthracnose development . One of the mechanisms likely to be used by hemibiotrophic pathogens like C. truncatum to colonize their host plants is the evasion or suppression of plant defense during the biotrophic phase, and elicitation during the BNS and necrotrophic phases.
Studies conducted to date have investigated the histology and cytology of compatible interaction between lentil and C. truncatum[3, 4]. However, the molecular basis of compatible and incompatible interaction is poorly understood. The generation of ESTs from pathogen-infected host tissues is an effective and rapid way to decipher the mechanisms underpinning plant-microbe interactions. Ma et al.  constructed a cDNA library to catalogue genes expressed during the compatible interaction between the obligate biotrophic pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici adapted race CYR31 (Pst; the causative agent of stripe rust) and wheat genotype Suwon 11. BLASTX analysis of 2743 unigenes from the Pst-infected host transcriptome revealed 52.8% as plant sequences and 16.3% as fungal sequences. The plant-derived unigenes were classified into 13 functional categories on the basis of cellular roles of expressed genes. The most highly represented functional group comprised enzymes involved in energy and metabolism, which included 26% of the unigenes, followed by unknown proteins (13%) and disease/defense related proteins (13%). In a similar study, Yu and colleagues  constructed a suppression subtracted hybridization library from the wheat genotype Suwon 11 challenged with urediniospores of non-adapted Pst race CYR23 and isolated 652 unigenes of plant origin. Seventy-seven unigenes (11%) were predicted to encode stress and resistance-related proteins, such as catalase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, hypersensitive induced reaction protein 1, wound-induced genes, and others. In a compatible interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana accession DiG and the necrotrophic pathogen Alternaria brassicicola, the causal agent of black spot disease of crucifers, Mukherjee et al.  identified differentially expressed genes by suppression subtraction hybridization. Among them were pathogenesis-related (PR) and monooxygenase genes.
Previously, we constructed a cDNA plasmid library from the anthracnose-susceptible Canadian lentil cv. Eston infected with C. truncatum isolate CT-21. In silico analyses using BLASTX algorithm of 5000 ESTs predicted that nearly 57% of the ESTs were likely to encode proteins of plant origin, whereas 39% encoded fungal proteins . In the current study, we determined the in planta growth phases of C. truncatum and characterized the lentil ESTs. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to differentiate susceptible and resistance genotypes using two resistance genes as target genes.
Defining the in planta growth phases of C. truncatum
To visualize the in planta fungal developmental stages, we collected leaf tissues of lentil cv. Eston infected with C. truncatum isolate CT-21 from 16 hours post-inoculation (hpi) to 68 hpi (Figure 1A-D). At 16 hpi, over 50% of appressoria had generated infection (or penetration) pegs that in turn had penetrated the host cell cuticle and cell wall. This stage of infection is known as the appressorium penetration phase. At 44 hpi, most epidermal cells contained an average of nine thick biotrophic primary hyphae (PH) (the biotrophic phase). These PH were entirely confined to the initially infected epidermal cells. These hyphae are likely to interact with the host plasma membrane but pull away after plasmolysis, indicating a weak host-pathogen association . In contrast, in other hemibiotrophic pathogens like Magnaporthe oryzae (the causative agent of rice blast disease), the biotrophic invasive hyphae invaginate and modify the host plasma membrane, and remain adhered with the host cell surface even after plasmolysis, indicating a tight host-pathogen association . During 48-56 hpi, nearly 80% of PH of C. truncatum gave rise to thinner secondary hyphae that invaded the neighboring cells. This period of infection is known as the BNS phase. This morphological differentiation of thin hyphae emanating from the thick PH coincides with onset of the destructive necrotrophic phase, when the host tissues are killed and macerated by the pathogen ahead of colonization (68 hpi).
The lentil transcriptome contains sequences encoding proteins belonging to 12 functional categories
To assign putative functions to the 1682 plant-derived unigenes, the sequences were queried against the non-redundant protein database using BLASTX. Fifty-five unigenes (3%) had no hit and 326 unigenes (19%) matched to either unknown or hypothetical proteins, and hence the function of 381 unigenes could not be determined. The remaining 1302 (78%) unigenes had homologies to proteins with known function in the protein database at an E value cutoff ≤10-5 and were classified into 12 functional categories according to the Arabidopsis sequencing project-functional categories and the Gene Ontology. The most highly represented functional group comprised stress and resistance associated proteins and included 387 unigenes (~23%), followed by 159 proteins for signal transduction (~10%), 147 with catalytic and binding activity (~9%), 142 involved in energy and carbon metabolism (~9%), 101 associated with membrane and transport (~6%), 84 with potential role in transcription and translation (~5%), 62 house-keeping proteins (~4%), 52 secondary metabolism (~3%), 49 with nucleic acid and protein-binding activity (~3%), 47 associated with cell structure (~3%), and 39 for amino acid biosynthesis and processing (~2%). The remaining 2% of the proteins encoded by 32 unigenes could not be classified (Figure 2).
Stress and resistance related proteins
Abundance dynamics of transcripts encoding stress and defense related proteins
PR proteins included thaumatin like proteins (53 transcripts), glucanases (6 transcripts) and chitinases (42 transcripts). One of the prominent defense responses associated with hypersensitive cell death response (HR) is the accumulation of PR proteins [10–12], some of which may have chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanse activity . The PR protein encoding genes are induced earlier and at higher levels in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions, compared to compatible interactions [10–12]. Their higher transcript levels during the BNS of the compatible lentil - C. truncatum interaction indicates the involvement of HR to initiate the transition process. Forty-five unique sequences assembled from 99 ESTs encoding heat shock proteins (HSPs), including small HSPs, HSP70, HSP80 and HSP90. HSPs are induced in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as pathogens, heat, cold and wound . Genes encoding catalase, peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase involved in antioxidant activity were also identified from the C. truncatum-infected transcriptome. In addition, 27 ESTs were matched to serine/threonine protein kinases, including mitogen activated (MAP) protein kinases, whereas 26 transcripts were similar to protein phosphatases, including calcineurin. ESTs encoding proteins responsible for recognition and transduction of signals to culminate in a host defense response were present in the host transcriptome. Among them were protein kinase (27 transcripts) and phosphatases (26 transcripts), GTPases (15 transcripts) and zinc finger proteins (24 transcripts). Fifteen transcripts encoded motifs characteristic for disease resistance (R) proteins, including nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats (NBS-LRR). Fourteen ESTs were matched to syringolide-induced proteins that were found to be induced after treatment with the syringolide elicitors produced by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.
Quantitative RT-PCR profiling of disease resistance genes
To investigate how the mRNA levels of disease resistance genes alter in susceptible (Eston) and partially resistant (CDC Robin) genotypes of L. culinaris during the interaction with C. truncatum isolate CT-21, two corresponding time-courses of infection (1 through 7 days post-inoculation [dpi]) were conducted. The expression of two R (NBS-LRR class) gene homologs contig 186 and LT21-1990 was analyzed using qRT-PCR. The contig 186 and LT21-1990 exhibited transcriptional peaks in Eston (17-fold) and CDC Robin (29-fold), respectively. The NBS-LRR class of R proteins is involved in either direct or indirect perception of pathogen effectors, resulting in a HR that is sufficient to halt the ingress of biotrophic pathogens. A 17-fold-induction of Contig 186 (TIR [toll/interleukin-1 receptor]-NBS-LRR) mRNA level was observed in CT-21-infected Eston leaf tissues harvested at 7 dpi, suggesting that HR triggered during recognition merely facilitates the infection process considering that the fungus is already in the destructive necrotrophic phase at this stage of infection. No transcriptional change was detected in CT21- infected CDC Robin plants. However, LT21-1990 (CC [coiled coil]-NBS-LRR) expression peaked at 4 dpi in the partially resistant genotype CDC Robin whereas expression in Eston remained unaltered (Figure 4). This suggests post-invasion resistance mechanisms may play a role in limiting the proliferation of C. truncatum in lentil tissues.
Nearly 57% of ESTs were identified as being of plant origin in the C. truncatum-infected lentil transcriptome and were clustered into 1682 unigenes. Among them, 647 unigenes were predicted to be implicated in stress and defense processes of host plants, including those involved in signal (pathogen molecules) perception or recognition (R-genes), translocation (serine/threonine protein kinases) and expression of resistance (PR-genes). The presence of a high number of such transcripts indicates that C. truncatum induces host defense at the BNS phase, most likely to facilitate the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy by causing HR. Rather than restricting pathogen growth as would be the case for a biotrophic pathogen, HR may facilitate fungal invasion during the necrotrophic phase.
It is likely that C. truncatum exposes itself to the host defense system by unmasking conserved pathogen molecules like pathogen associated molecular patterns and by secreting cell death elicitors and toxins during the BNS phase. The pathogen conserved features (signals) are likely to be recognized by host receptors like extracellular (LRR) and cytoplasmic (NBS-LRR) R-proteins (JG293831 and JG293836). Receptor-mediated perception of signals may lead to a cascade reaction through the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of MAPKs (JG293551 and JG293556), MAPKKs (JG293552 and JG293555) and MAPKKKs (JG293550 and JG293553) [18, 19]. In addition, we identified 13 discrete unigenes encoding G-proteins, including small GTPases Ras (JG293600 and JG293602), Rab (JG293603), Rho (JG293604) and Ran (JG293612) GTPases. Signal transducing GTPases in plants include monomeric (small GTPase) and heterotrimeric G-proteins. Small GTPases are ubiquitous components of signaling systems in animals  and yeast , and one group of their effectors is MAPKKK  and, hence, MAPK cascades. This indicates that serine/threonine protein kinases and GTPase may be involved in the signal transduction between lentil and C. truncatum during the hemibiotrophic infection process. These MAPKs may phosphorylate WRKY transcription factors (JG293516, JG293517, JG294035 and JG294036) as shown for taobacco transcription factor WRKY1 by the MAP kinase SIPK. Coexpression of SIPK and WRKY1 in tobacco resulted in accelerated cell death, suggesting that SIPK and WRKY1 participate in the HR . To date, a number of transcription factors, including TGA, WRKY, Myb, and EREBP, have been shown to act downstream of MAPKs [19, 24–27]. WRKY transcription factors have been involved in the regulation of plant defense gene expression [28–30]. Their cognate binding site, the W box, can be found in the promoters of genes associated with resistance, such as PR genes [26, 31–34]. A number of recent studies have pointed out the involvement of WRKY transcription factors in regulating the expression of PR genes potentially by direct binding in Arabidopsis[35–37].
Phytopathogens secrete effector proteins to facilitate colonization and to suppress host defenses. Some of which function in the apoplast and others are transported to the host cell cytoplasm [38, 39]. Apoplastic effectors interfere with host plant defense processes, e.g., by inhibiting plant proteases and lytic enzymes. Cytoplasmic effectors may be recognized by intracellular receptors like NBS-LRR type resistance proteins. This recognition may be direct as shown for Pto and AvrPto (tomato resistance gene and Pseudomonas syringae effector, respectively) interaction  or indirect. Indirect recognition is based on detection of altered conformation of virulence targets by R-proteins (Guard hypothesis) . In both cases, the second stage of resistance after perception involves the transduction of recognition signal to the nucleus and to pre-formed enzyme complexes in the cell, resulting in the onset of active defenses, including generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell wall reinforcement, production of antimicrobial compounds like phytoalexins, defense gene activation and programmed cell death (HR) [42, 43]. However, at the BNS, rather than restricting the pathogen development, this active defense merely facilitates the transition of the hemibiotroph to the necrotrophic phase, which may require highly focused and transient cell death/necrosis. Expression profiling of two unique sequences encoding proteins of the NBS-LRR class of resistance proteins showed that contig 186 and LT21-1990 were induced in susceptible and partially resistant genotypes, respectively. Temporal expression of resistance genes differentiates the response of a genotype as susceptible or resistant.
Genes encoding potential ROS generating and scavenging enzymes like type 3 peroxidase (JG293954), catalase (JG294070), ascorbate peroxidase (JG294047) and glutathione S-transferase (JG293849 through JG293868) were also present in the cDNA library, suggesting that ROS may play an important role in the lentil response to C. truncatum during the BNS. The transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy may be facilitated by ROS production and programmed cell death as the necrotrophic phase of the pathogen requires assimilation of nutrients from dead or necrotized host tissues [44, 45]. We also identified eight discrete unigenes encoding proteins induced by syringolide in the C. truncatum-infected lentil transcriptome. Syringolides are low molecular weight glycolipid elicitors secreted by the bacterial plant pathogen P. syringae pv. glycinea strains carrying an active allele of avr gene D (avrD) . These elicitors are believed to translocate into the host cell by passive diffusion where they bind to a cytoplasmic 34-kDa protein (p34) that is present in both resistant (carrying Rpg 4 resistance gene) and susceptible (carrying the recessive allele rpg4) soybean cultivars, suggesting that p34 acts as a guardee and that the interaction conforms to the guard hypothesis. Syringolides elicit HR in Rpg4 soybean cultivars, but not in rpg4 cultivars . It is likely that C. truncatum secretes syringolide-like proteins at the BNS that manipulate or alter guardee-like proteins (virulence targets) of lentil (JG293986 through JG293993). Such interactions may activate the cognate R proteins, resulting in the HR cell death, which likely signals the switch to necrotrophy.
We catalogued and characterized the lentil transcriptome induced during the BNS phase of C. truncatum infection in the susceptible lentil cv. Eston. The presence of high numbers of transcripts encoding defense related proteins indicates that the pathogen triggers a cascade of defense responses, which culminate into cell death and as a result, the pathogen proliferates by switching the lifestyle to necrotrophy and colonize plant tissues. The data obtained in this study also suggest that the timing of induction in defense responses is the determining factor for susceptibility or resistance of a genotype to pathogens.
Plant and fungal materials
Lentil plants of the susceptible Canadian cultivar Eston  and the partially resistant cultivar CDC Robin , and the C. truncatum isolate CT-21 (compatible with Eston, restricted growth in CDC Robin) were maintained as described previously [2, 3]. For infection assays, fungal spores (conidia) were collected from 10-day-old oatmeal agar cultures by flooding Petri dishes with sterile water. Three-week-old lentil plants and fungal spore suspensions (4 × 104 conidia/mL) were used in attached and detached infection assays .
Visualization of the in plantafungal structures
A detached infection assay with lentil cv. Eston and CT-21 was conducted, and infected lentil leaf tissues collected at various time-points were fixed in a solution of 60% methanol, 30% chloroform, and 10% acetic acid until required. Fixed samples were re-hydrated and stained in trypan blue solution as described previously . The leaves then were mounted in 30% glycerol on glass slides and viewed at 40X magnification using an axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY, USA).
EST analysis and functional categorization of lentil transcriptome
A BNS-specific cDNA library in the plasmid pBluescript® II XR was constructed from C. truncatum-infected lentil (cv. Eston) leaf tissues and 5000 ESTs were generated . For this study, lentil ESTs were trimmed for vector, adaptor, and low quality sequence regions using DNAMAN software (Lynnon Corporation, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). The resulting sequences were clustered using Sequencher (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) into unique sequences (unigenes). A similarity search was performed to assign putative functions to these unigenes using the BLASTX algorithm with an E value threshold ≤10-5. The putative functions of unigenes with plant origin were classified according to Beavn et al.  and Ashburner et al. .
Intact plant infection time-courses, RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR
Lentil cultivars Eston and CDC Robin were sprayed with C. truncatum CT-21, and incubated under controlled conditions conducive to anthracnose infection as described elsewhere . Leaf tissues were harvested at 24 hours intervals until 7 dpi, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until required. Total RNA was extracted using phenol and chloroform extraction followed by LiCl precipitation , and the genomic DNA (gDNA) was removed from total RNA using RNase-free amplification grade DNase I (Invitrogen life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Two micrograms of gDNA-free total RNA were used to synthesize cDNA with SuperScript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the protocol of the supplier, and the resulting cDNA was diluted 20 times in DNase/RNase-free ultra pure water (Invitrogen life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR analyses were conducted on the CFX96 platform (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) complying with the MIQE guidelines .
Lens culinaris EF1- α was used as the reference gene as it shows no alternation in its transcript levels in lentil following C. truncatum inoculation. The mRNA levels of selected target genes (contig 186 and LT21-1990) at various time-points were normalized, and the normalized expression of target genes in non-infected lentil tissues was used as calibrator (considered as 1). The relative gene expression (fold change) was calculated from 3 biological replicates using the 2-△△CT method . Primers used in the study are listed in the Additional file 2.
This work was supported by the Saskatchewan Pulse Crop Development Board.
- Sutton BC: The Coelomycetes. 1980, Wallingford: CAB International PressGoogle Scholar
- Bhadauria V, Banniza S, Vandenberg A, Selvaraj G, Wei Y: EST analysis identifies proteins putatively secreted by the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum. BMC Genom. 2011, 12: e327-10.1186/1471-2164-12-327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Latunde-Dada AO, Lucas JA: Localized hemibiotrophy in Colletotrichum: cytological and molecular taxonomic similarities among C. destructivum, C. linicola and C. truncatum. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56: 437-447. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01576.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong-Cho C, Wang J, Wei Y, Banniza S: The infection process of two pathogenic races of Colletotrichum truncatum on lentil. Can J Plant Pathol. 2012, 34 (1): 58-67. 10.1080/07060661.2012.664565.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma J, Huang X, Wang X, Chen X, Qu Z, Huang L, Kang Z: Identification of expressed genes during compatible interaction between stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis) and wheat using a cDNA library. BMC Genom. 2009, 10: 586-10.1186/1471-2164-10-586.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu X, Wang X, Wang C, Chen X, Qu Z, Yu X, Han Q, Zhao J, Guo J, Huang L, Kang Z: Wheat defense genes in fungal (Puccinia striiformis) infection. Funct Integr Genom. 2010, 10: 227-239. 10.1007/s10142-010-0161-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mukherjee AK, Lev S, Gepstein S, Horwitz BA: A compatible interaction of Alternaria brassicicola with Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype DiG: evidence for a specific transcriptional signature. BMC Plant Biology. 2009, 9: 31-10.1186/1471-2229-9-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kankanala P, Czymmek K, Valenta B: Roles for rice membrane dynamics and plasmodesmata during biotrophic invasion by the blast fungus. Plant Cell. 2007, 19: 706-724. 10.1105/tpc.106.046300.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhadauria V, Banniza S, Vandenberg A, Selvaraj G, Wei Y: Cataloging proteins putatively secreted during the biotrophy-necrotrophy transition of the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6 (10): 1457-1459. 10.4161/psb.6.10.18165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Wit PJGM, Van der Meer EF: Accumulation of the pathogenesis-related tomato leaf protein P14 as an early indicator of incompatibility in the interaction between Cladosporium fulvum (syn. Fulvia fulva) and tomato. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1986, 628: 203-214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joosten MHAJ, De Wit PJGM: Identification of several pathogenesis-related proteins in tomato leaves inoculated with Cladosporium fulvum (syn. Fulvia fulva) as 1,3-β-glucanases and chitinases. Plant Physiol. 1989, 89: 945-951. 10.1104/pp.89.3.945.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Kan JAL, Joosten MHAJ, Wagemakers CAM, Van der Berg-Velthuis GCM, De Wit PJGM: Differential accumulation of mRNAs encoding extracellular and intracellular PR proteins in tobacco induced by virulent and avirulent races of Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Mol Biol. 1992, 20: 513-527. 10.1007/BF00040610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danhash N, Wagemakers CAM, Van Kan JAL, De Wit PJGM: Molecular characterization of four chitinase cDNAs obtained from Cladosporium fulvum-infected tomato. Plant Mol Biol. 1993, 22: 1017-1029. 10.1007/BF00028974.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Didierjean L, Frendo P, Nasser W, Genot G, Marivet J, Burkard G: Heavy metal-responsive genes in maize: identification and comparison of their expression upon various forms of abiotic stress. Planta. 1996, 199: 1-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hagihara T, Hashi M, Takeuchi Y, Yamaoka N: Cloning of soybean genes induced during hypersensitive cell death caused by syringolide elicitor. Planta. 2004, 218: 1432-2048.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu G, Jantasuriyarat C, Zhou B, Wang GL: Isolation and characterization of novel defense response genes involved in compatible and incompatible interactions between rice Magnaporthe grisea. Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 108 (3): 525-534. 10.1007/s00122-003-1451-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribot C, Hirsch J, Balzergue S, Tharreau D, Notteghem JL MH, Morel JB: Susceptibility of rice to the blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. J Plant Physiol. 2008, 165 (1): 114-124. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.06.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jonak C, Kiegerl S, Ligterink W, Barker PJ, Huskisson N, Sand Hirt H: 1996. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 11274-11279. 10.1073/pnas.93.20.11274.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu WL, GomezGomez L, Boller T, Ausubel FM, Sheen J: MAP kinase signaling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature. 2002, 415: 977-983. 10.1038/415977a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bos JL: Ras. GTPases. Edited by: Hall A. 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67-88.Google Scholar
- Schmidt A, Hall MN: Signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998, 14: 305-338. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daum G, Eisenmann-Tappe I, Fries HW, Troppmair J, Rapp U: The ins and outs of Raf kinases. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994, 19: 474-479. 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90133-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menke FLH, Kang H, Chen Z, Park JM, Kumar D, Klessig DF: Tobacco transcription factor WRKY1 is phosphorylated by the MAP kinase SIPK and mediates HR-like cell death in tobacco. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18 (10): 1027-1034. 10.1094/MPMI-18-1027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheong YH, Moon BC, Kim JK, Kim CY, Kim MC, Kim IH, Park CY, Kim JC, Park BO, Koo SC, Yoon HW, Chung WS, Lim CO, Lee SY, Cho MJ: BWMK1, a rice mitogen-activated protein kinase, locates in the nucleus and mediates pathogenesis-related gene expression by activation of a transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132: 1961-1972. 10.1104/pp.103.023176.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekengren SK, Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Martin GB: Two MAPK cascades, NPR1, and TGA transcription factors play a role in Pto-mediated disease resistance in tomato. Plant J. 2003, 36: 905-917. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01944.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim CY, Zhang S: Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade induces WRKY family of transcription factors and defense genes in tobacco. Plant J. 2004, 38: 142-151. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02033.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Involvement of MEK1 MAPKK, NTF6 MAPK, WRKY/MYB transcription factors, COI1 and CTR1 in N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant J. 2004, 38: 800-809. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02085.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rushton PJ, Somssich IE: Transcriptional control of plant genes responsive to pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998, 1: 311-315. 10.1016/1369-5266(88)80052-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rushton PJ, Torres JT, Parniske M, Wernert P, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE: Interaction of elicitor-induced DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 5690-5700.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh K, Foley RC, Onate-Sanchez L: Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002, 5: 430-436. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00289-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dong J, Chen C, Chen Z: Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 51: 21-37. 10.1023/A:1020780022549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalde M, Barth M, Somssich IE, Lippok B: Members of the Arabidopsis WRKY group III transcription factors are part of different plant defense signaling pathways. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2003, 16: 295-305. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.4.295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maleck K, Levine A, Eulgem T, Morgan A, Schmid J, Lawton KA, Dangl JL, Dietrich RA: The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nat Genet. 2000, 26: 403-410. 10.1038/82521.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen M, Brodersen P, Naested H, Andreasson E, Lindhart U, Johansen B, Nielsen HB, Lacy M, Austin MJ, Parker JE, Sharma SB, Klessig DF, Martienssen R, Mattsson O, Jensen AB, Mundy J: Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell. 2000, 103: 1111-1120. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00213-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Chen Z: Potentiation of developmentally regulated plant defense response by AtWRKY18, a pathogen-induced Arabidopsis transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129: 706-716. 10.1104/pp.001057.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robatzek S, Somssich IE: Targets of AtWRKY6 regulation during plant senescense and pathogen defense. Genes Dev. 2002, 16: 1139-1149. 10.1101/gad.222702.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim KC, Fan B, Chen Z: Pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY7 is a transcriptional repressor and enhances plant susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142: 1180-1192. 10.1104/pp.106.082487.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ: Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 2006, 124: 803-814. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones JDG, Dangl JL: The plant immune system. Nature. 2006, 444: 323-329. 10.1038/nature05286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim YJ, Lin NC, Martin GB: Two distinct Pseudomonas effector proteins interact with the Pto kinase and activate plant immunity. Cell. 2002, 109: 589-598. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00743-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dangl JL, Jones JDG: Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001, 411: 826-833. 10.1038/35081161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nurnberger T, Scheel D: Signal transmission in plant immune response. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6: 372-379. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02019-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JDG: Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell. 1996, 8: 1773-1791.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Govrin EM, Levine A: The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Curr Biol. 2000, 10 (13): 751-757. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00560-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayer AM, Staples RC, Gil-ad NL: Mechanisms of survival of necrotrophic fungal plant pathogens in hosts expressing the hypersensitive response. Phytochemistry. 2001, 58 (1): 33-41. 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00187-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Midland SL, Keen NT, Sims JJ, Midland MM, Stayton MM, Burton V, Smith MJ, Mazzola EP, Graham KJ, Clardy J: The structures of syringolides 1 and 2, novel C-glycosidic elicitors from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. J Org Chem. 1993, 60: 1118-1119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ji C, Okinaka Y, Takeuchi Y, Tsurushima T, Buzzell RI, Sims JJ, Midland SL, Slaymaker D, Yoshikawa M, Yamaoka N, Keen NT: Specific binding of the syringolide elicitors to a soluble protein fraction from soybean leaves. Plant Cell. 1997, 9: 1425-433.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slinkard A: Eston lentil. Can J Plant Sci. 1981, 61: 733-734. 10.4141/cjps81-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vandenberg A, Kiehn FA, Vera C, Gaudiel R, Buchwaldt L, Dueck S, Wahab J, Slinkard AE: CDC Robin lentil. Can J Plant Sci. 2002, 82: 111-112. 10.4141/P01-003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhadauria V, Miraz P, Kennedy R, Banniza S, Wei Y: Dual trypan-aniline blue fluorescence staining methods to study fungal-plant interactions. Biotech Histochem. 2010, 85 (2): 99-105. 10.3109/10520290903132196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beavn M, Bancroft I, Bent E, Love K, Goodman H, Dean C, Bergkamp R, Dirkse W, Staveren MV, Stiekema W, Drost L, Ridley P, Hudson SA, Patel K, Murphy G, Piffanelli P, Wedler H, Wedler E, Wambutt R, Weitzenegger T, Pohl TM, Terryn N, Gielen J, Villarroel R, Clerck RD, Montagu MV, Lecharny A, Auborg S, Gy I, Kreis M: Analysis of 1.9 MB of contiguous sequence from chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 1998, 391: 485-488. 10.1038/35140.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Tarver LI, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 25-29. 10.1038/75556.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkins TA, Smart LB: Isolation of RNA from plant tissue. A Laboratory Guide to RNA: Isolation, Analysis, and Synthesis. Edited by: Krieg PA. 1996, New York: Wiley-Liss Inc, 21-42.Google Scholar
- Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT: The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009, 55 (4): 611-622. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-△△CT method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.