Skip to main content

Table 4 QTLs with a LOD score passing the permutated threshold but lower than 3

From: QTL mapping and epistatic interaction analysis in asparagus bean for several characterized and novel horticulturally important traits

QTL Location/LG Methods of QTL detection Position (cM) Length (cM) Closest marker MQM LODc LOD threshold MQM
R2(%)
Additive effect
  SX2009         
Qnff.zaas-6 LG6 IM, MQM 28.3-35.4 7.1 Clm0438 2.96 1.9 13.2 0.83
Qnff.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 30-35.1 5.1 1_1103 2.29 1.8 10.6 0.73
Qpn.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 50.3-52.6 2.3 Clm0614 2.32 2.2 12.1 1.85
  HN2010         
Qfld.zaas-10 a LG10 IM, MQMb 31.5-38.7 7.2 1_0981 2.4 2 11.4 0.59
Qnff.zaas-2 LG2 IM, MQM 8.8-12.3 3.5 Clm0053 2.28 2.2 11.7 0.44
Qpn.zaas-4 LG4 IM, MQM 7.7-9.0 1.3 1_1034 2.43 1.8 11.3 1.19
Qls.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 64-67 3 1_0380 2.43 2 11.4 −0.32
Qls.zaas-7 LG7 IM, MQM 20.7-25.5 4.8 Clm0445 2.46 1.9 11.4 −0.32
  SX2010 c         
Qfld.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 93-94.1 1.1 Clm0269 2.33 2.3 10.7 0.6
Qfld.zaas-10 LG10 IM, MQM 31.5-42.6 11.1 1_0140 2.61 2 11.8 0.62
  1. a FLD: days to first flowering, NFF: nodes to first flower, LS: leaf senescence, PN: pod number per plant.
  2. b IM: interval mapping, MQM: multiple-QTL mode mapping.
  3. c The trait of NFF not investigated in this experiment.
  4. Only QTLs detectable by both IM and MQM were included.