QTL mapping and epistatic interaction analysis in asparagus bean for several characterized and novel horticulturally important traits

Table 4 QTLs with a LOD score passing the permutated threshold but lower than 3

QTL	Location/LG	Methods of QTL detection	Position (cM)	Length (cM)	Closest marker	MQM LOD^c	LOD threshold	MQM R²(%)	Additive effect
	SX2009
Qnff.zaas-6	LG6	IM, MQM	28.3-35.4	7.1	Clm0438	2.96	1.9	13.2	0.83
Qnff.zaas-11	LG11	IM, MQM	30-35.1	5.1	1_1103	2.29	1.8	10.6	0.73
Qpn.zaas-3	LG3	IM, MQM	50.3-52.6	2.3	Clm0614	2.32	2.2	12.1	1.85
	HN2010
Qfld.zaas-10 ^a	LG10	IM, MQM^b	31.5-38.7	7.2	1_0981	2.4	2	11.4	0.59
Qnff.zaas-2	LG2	IM, MQM	8.8-12.3	3.5	Clm0053	2.28	2.2	11.7	0.44
Qpn.zaas-4	LG4	IM, MQM	7.7-9.0	1.3	1_1034	2.43	1.8	11.3	1.19
Qls.zaas-3	LG3	IM, MQM	64-67	3	1_0380	2.43	2	11.4	−0.32
Qls.zaas-7	LG7	IM, MQM	20.7-25.5	4.8	Clm0445	2.46	1.9	11.4	−0.32
	SX2010 ^c
Qfld.zaas-3	LG3	IM, MQM	93-94.1	1.1	Clm0269	2.33	2.3	10.7	0.6
Qfld.zaas-10	LG10	IM, MQM	31.5-42.6	11.1	1_0140	2.61	2	11.8	0.62

^a FLD: days to first flowering, NFF: nodes to first flower, LS: leaf senescence, PN: pod number per plant.
^b IM: interval mapping, MQM: multiple-QTL mode mapping.
^c The trait of NFF not investigated in this experiment.
Only QTLs detectable by both IM and MQM were included.

ISSN: 2730-6844