Skip to main content

Table 5 True and estimated effects for the simulated data with main and epistatic effects

From: Empirical Bayesian LASSO-logistic regression for multiple binary trait locus mapping

locus i

locus j

True β

EBLASSO- NE β ^ s β ^ a

EBLASSO-NEG β ^ s β ^ a

LASSO β ^ s β ^ a

HyperLasso β ^ s β ^ a

Two-locus test β ^ s β ^ a

11

11

1.99

0.83(0.12)

1.66(0.19)

0.72(0.65)

2.21(0.25)

0.88(0.10)

26

26

1.81

0.46(0.11)

1.42(0.18)

0.39(0.55)

1.73(0.23)

0.56(0.09)

42

42

−1.28

−0.36(0.11)

−0.87(0.20)

−

−1.59(0.21)b

−

48

48

−0.91

−0.19(0.09)b

−0.68(0.19)b

−0.14(0.55)b

−

−

72

72

1.28

1.01(0.16)

2.53(0.20)

0.92(1.18)

3.17(0.27)

1.08(0.10)

73

73

1.81

0.40(0.14)

−

−

−

1.04(0.10)

182

182

2.19

0.50(0.14)

1.57(0.26)

0.51(0.96)

2.03(0.30)

1.23(0.10)

185

185

1.29

0.69(0.14)

1.49(0.26)

0.57(0.91)

1.88(0.30)

1.23(0.10)

262

262

−1.28

−0.24(0.09)

−0.70(0.15)

−0.15(0.46)

−0.78(0.19)b

−

268

268

0.91

−

−

−

−

−

5

6

1.28

0.42(0.13)

1.11(0.22)

0.40(0.63)

1.63(0.28)

−

6

39

1.29

0.38(0.15)b

1.37(0.23)b

0.15(1.16)b

1.28(0.35)b

−

42

220

1.99

0.23(0.13)

1.99(0.25)b

−

2.47(0.32)

0.77(0.14)

81

200

−1.28

−0.36(0.13)b

−1.02(0.22)b

−0.15(1.42)b

−1.22(0.27)b

−

87

164

1.81

0.44(0.17)

1.73(0.25)

0.24(1.44)

2.15(0.32)b

−

87

322

2.19

0.90(0.15)

2.10(0.25)

0.74(0.66)

2.44(0.30)

0.79(0.13)

118

278

−1.28

−0.29(0.12)

−0.76(0.20)

−0.19(1.29)

−0.99(0.26)

−

328

404

−0.99

−0.21(0.12)b

−

−0.15(0.73)b

−1.15(0.30)b

−

373

400

−0.91

−0.22(0.12)b

−1.12(0.22)b

−0.19(0.87)

−1.23(0.27)

−

431

439

1.81

0.24(0.13)

1.37(0.24)

−

1.58(0.29)b

−

Parameter(s)

λ = 0.1600

a = −0.2

λ=0.0254

a = 0.1

 

b = 0.1

α=0.01

CPU time(s)

2037.4

268.6

62.7

1094.6

2936.0

True/False positive

19/5c

17/4c

15/26c

17/7c

8/18d

  1. aThe estimated marker effect is denoted by β ^ and the standard deviation is denoted by s β ^ .
  2. bThe estimated marker effect was obtained from a neighboring marker (≤ 20 cM) rather than from the marker with true effect.
  3. cNumber of effects with p-value ≤ 0.05.
  4. dNumber of effects with a p-value ≤ 4.31×10-7 after Bonferroni correction was applied.