Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects significance for pearl millet data

From: Association studies including genotype by environment interactions: prospects and limits

Effect

df

Fit1

Fit5

Intercept

1

< 10 -26

< 10 -26

Trial

8

< 10 -26

< 10 -26

Q1

1

0.1954

0.1917

Q2

1

0.0017

0.0016

Q3

1

0.1663

0.1610

Q4

1

0.0244

0.0231

Q5

1

0.1128

0.1103

Q6

1

0.0519

0.0511

PHYC

1

0.0044

0.0044

Trial × Q1

8

-

0.2942

Trial × Q2

8

-

0.3272

Trial × Q3

8

-

0.1102

Trial × Q4

8

-

0.4017

Trial × Q5

8

-

0.6050

Trial × Q6

8

-

0.8051

Trial × PHYC

8

-

0.0658

Q1 × PHYC

1

-

0.5669

Q2 × PHYC

1

-

0.2556

Q3 × PHYC

1

-

0.1405

Q4 × PHYC

1

-

0.6343

Q5 × PHYC

1

-

0.6349

Q6 × PHYC

1

-

0.5684

Trial × Q1 × PHYC

8

-

0.1705

Trial × Q2 × PHYC

8

-

0.3126

Trial x Q3 × PHYC

8

-

0.8426

Trial × Q4 × PHYC

8

-

0.0537

Trial × Q5 × PHYC

8

-

0.0821

Trial × Q6 × PHYC

8

-

0.6632

  1. The SNP considered here for PHYC is the SNP in position 101. The model selected by both BIC and WLD (Fit1) and, respectively, the model selected by AICC (Fit5) were considered. Fixed effects significance was assessed using Wald test. P-values are given for each fixed effect term in the model. Significant p-values (P < 0.05) are highlighted in bold. Qi: ancestry in population i; df: degree of freedom.
Back to article page

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us