Skip to main content

Table 7 QTL interactions detected for grain yield and yield-contributing traits during 2 years of screening under upland conditions in Kali Aus/2*IR64 population

From: Identification and mapping of stable QTL with main and epistasis effect on rice grain yield under upland drought stress

Trait

Year

QTLi

Intervali

Positioni(cM)

QTLj

Intervalj

Positionj(cM)

AA (%)

Fi, Fjvalue

P value

R2(%)

GY

2012 DS RS

qDTY 1.3

RM488–RM315

108.2

qDTY 2.1

RM324–RM263

53.6

35

3.8, 4.4

0.00017

6.6%

 

2013 DS RS

qDTY 1.3

RM488–RM315

108.2

qDTY 2.1

RM324–RM263

60.6

46

4.0, 4.8

0.00009

6.2%

DTF

2012 DS RS

qDTF 2.1

RM154–RM324

24.3

qDTF 2.3

RM263–RM573

101.4

1.28

5.7, 4.3

0.00004

6.7%

 

2013 DS RS

qDTF 2.1

RM154–RM324

14.3

qDTF 2.3

RM263–RM573

101.4

2.64

4.4, 3.9

0.00063

5.4%

 

2012 DS NS

qDTF 1.2

RM259–RM306

32.2

qDTF 2.3

RM450–RM250

128.2

2.02

4.4, 3.3

0.000005

7.4%

 

2013 DS NS

qDTF 1.2

RM259–RM306

30.2

qDTF 2.3

RM450–RM250

124.4

2.21

4.0, 5.7

0.00003

6.5%

  1. 2012 DS RS: 2012 dry season reproductive stress, 2013 DS RS: 2013 dry season reproductive stress, 2012 DS NS: 2012 dry season non-stress, 2013 DS NS: 2013 dry season non-stress.
  2. QTLi and QTLj: testing points i and j, respectively.
  3. Intervali and Intervalj: the intervals of testing points i and j.
  4. AA: additive-by-additive.