- Research article
- Open Access
Two new plumage mutations in the Japanese quail: "curly" feather and "rusty" plumage
© Minvielle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 02 December 2004
Accepted: 11 March 2005
Published: 11 March 2005
The genetics of plumage of Japanese quail is of interest both from a biological standpoint, for comparative studies between avian species, and from a zootechnical standpoint, for identifying commercial selection lines or crosses. There are only few plumage mutations reported in quail, and the present work describes a new color variant "rusty" and a new feather structure "curly", and their heredity from an F1 and F2 segregation experiment.
Curly feathers result from abnormal early growth caused by transient joining of follicle walls of adjacent feathers around 10 days of age, but the expression of the trait is variable. Rusty plumage color results from the replacement of the wild-type plumage pattern on the tip of the feather by a reddish coloration, but the pigmentation of the bottom part of the feather is not affected. Two lines breeding true for the curly or the rusty phenotype were developed. Both characters are determined by autosomal recessive mutations which are independent. The curly mutation has also a positive effect on body weight at 5 weeks of age.
The curly line is a new model which may be used for further work on the growth of the feather, and the rusty mutation is a new addition to the panel of plumage mutations available for comparative studies in poultry, and more generally among avian species.
Japanese quail is both a model animal in biology and a bird used for meat and egg production under a large variety of settings . In the recent past, a special attention was given to the study of its plumage, and several major genes have been described . Since the last compilation of plumage mutations of Japanese quail , new loci were described [e.g. ], linkage and epistasis relationships were explored [4, 5], and some genes were recently mapped . This knowledge has already been put to use for running comparisons between chicken and quail based on plumage genetics [7, 8], and for tagging commercial quail lines with a visible plumage trait, like the "fawn" mutation , or with an auto-sexing mutation like the "roux" gene . Interestingly, some of the mutations described in quail, like the sex-linked "roux" and the lethal "yellow" mutations still have no known homologues in the chicken. Moreover, the fact that some plumage colors, like "lavender", are common to several avian species  is an added incentive to enrich the panel of characterised Japanese quail mutations as potential tools for comparative studies among bird species.
In the present work, a new feather structure phenotype (curly) and a new plumage color (rusty) were described, and their mode of inheritance and linkage were studied in two successive generations (F1 and F2) from an F0 made of eight quail with curly feathering and eight birds with rusty plumage. Growth of the F2 quail was also monitored and compared according to their phenotype for the two plumage mutations.
Results and discussion
Segregation of plumage color and feather structure in the F2 from rusty plumage and curly feather quail lines
Observed (n = 531)
Expected under independent segregation
And complete penetrance (λ = 0)
And incomplete penetrance (0 < λ < 1)
a = 326
9n/16 = 298.7
9n/16+3λn/16 = 315.6¥
b = 95
3n/16 = 99.6
3n/16+λn/16 = 105.2
c = 79
3n/16 = 99.6
3n(1-λ)/16 = 82.7
Rusty and curly
d = 31
n/16 = 33.2
n(1-λ)/16 = 27.6
Goodness of fit
χ2s = 7.5£
χ2s = 1.9$
Analyses of variance of body weight of the F2 from rusty plumage and curly feather quail lines
Mean body weight (g) (SD)
Significance of main effects
"curly" – "wild-type"
"rusty" – "wild-type"
The two new "curly" and "rusty" mutations will enrich the small number of plumage mutations already available in Japanese quail for studying the genetics and the biology of feathers, a field of research with many perspectives . They may have also some interest from a zootechnical standpoint to tag commercial lines, and, if the positive effect of the "curly" mutation was confirmed, this gene might be worth introgressing in parental meat quail lines.
The two mutations originated in the experimental quail population maintained and selected on behavioral traits at the INRA Station de recherches avicoles in Nouzilly, France. After two quail lines were established by fixing separately the curly and the rusty phenotypes, eight reciprocal single pair matings (three "rusty × curly" and five "curly × rusty") were set up with G5 rusty and G4 curly quail from the two pure lines to produce the F1. Then, 531 F2 birds were produced in three consecutive hatches from 17 single pair matings of F1 birds. Sib-mating was avoided, and the hatching rate across all pair matings and hatches was 81%. All chicks were pedigreed, and they were phenotyped for plumage color at hatching and for feather structure at 10 days of age. F2 quail from the first two hatches were raised in two group pens (one per hatch) with free access to ad libitum commercial feed and drinking water, and they were weighed weekly until 5 weeks of age.
Gene nomenclature used in this paper followed recommendations published for chicken genes , with a two-part symbol: "locus abbreviation"*"allele abbreviation/locus", and "locus abbreviation*N" as the symbol for the wild-type allele.
Analysis of the segregation in the F2 to test for linkage was carried out using maximum likelihood methodology and the χ2 test . Penetrance and its standard error were estimated as: 1-λ = (3c/(a+c)) + d(b+d) and SE = (9ac/(a+c)3) + bd/(b+d)3, derived for misclassification of phenotypes due to "partial manifestation" . In the formulae, a, b, c and d are the numbers of observations in the four phenotypic classes described in Table 1.
Five-way analyses of variance of individual body weights (BW) between hatching and 5 weeks of age were carried out by the GLM procedure  for the 348 quail hatched alive in the first two hatches, using the following linear model: BW=(overall mean) + hatch + family + sex + (feather structure phenotype) + (plumage color phenotype) + error. The number of classes for the five main effects were respectively, 2, 17, 2, 2 and 2. Contrasts between least-squared means for each mutant phenotype and for the wild-type quail were estimated from the analyses of variance, using data adjusted for systematic effects of hatch, family and sex.
The authors wish to thank J.M. Faure (INRA SRA, Nouzilly, France) for kindly providing curly and rusty quail he had found in his experimental population.
- Minvielle F: The future of Japanese quail for research and production. World Poult Sci J. 2004, 60: 500-507. 10.1079/WPS200433.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Somes RG: International Registry of Poultry Genetic Stocks. 1988, Bulletin 476, Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, University of ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
- Ito S, Tsudzuki M: Orange: a plumage color mutation accompanied by semi-lethality in Japanese quail. J Hered. 1994, 85: 54-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minvielle F, Ito S, Inoue-Murayama M, Mizutani M, Wakasugi N: Genetic analyses of plumage color mutations on the Z chromosome of Japanese quail. J Hered. 2000, 91: 499-501. 10.1093/jhered/91.6.499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minvielle F, Gourichon D, Monvoisin JL: Effects of two-locus combinations, using the roux, lavender and beige mutation, on plumage color of Japanese quail. J Hered. 2003, 94: 517-522. 10.1093/jhered/esg091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miwa M, Inoue-Murayama M, Kayang BB, Vignal A, Minvielle F, Monvoisin JL, Takahashi H, Ito S: Mapping of plumage color and blood protein genes on the microsatellite linkage map of the Japanese quail. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Animal Genetics: September 11–16 2004; Tokyo. 2004, International Society for Animal Genetics, Japanese Society of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 83-Google Scholar
- Silversides FG, Mérat P: Homology of the s+ locus in the chicken with Al+ in the Japanese quail. J Hered. 1991, 82: 245-247.Google Scholar
- Minvielle F, Gourichon D, Monvoisin JL: Testing homology of loci for two plumage colors, lavender and recessive white, with chicken and Japanese quail hybrids. J Hered. 2002, 93: 73-76. 10.1093/jhered/93.1.73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nichols CR, Cheng K: Fawn- a plumage color mutation in Japanese quail. Poult Sci. 1988, 67: 127-Google Scholar
- Minvielle F, Hirigoyen E, Boulay M: Associated effects of the roux plumage color mutation on growth, carcass traits, egg production, and reproduction of Japanese quail. Poult Sci. 1999, 78: 1479-1484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fulton JE, Roberts CW, Cheng KM: Associated porcupine. Poult Sci. 1982, 61: 429-433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crittenden LB, Bitgood JJ, Burt DW, Ponce de Leon FA, Tixier-Boichard M: Nomenclature for naming loci, alleles, linkage groups and chromosomes to be used in poultry genome publications and databases. Genet Sel Evol. 1996, 28: 289-297.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mérat P, Bordas A, Jonon F, Perramon A: Effets quantitatifs associés au gène albinos lié au sexe chez la caille japonaise. Ann Génét Sél Anim. 1981, 13: 75-91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu M, Yue Z, Wu P, Wu DY, Mayer JA, Medina M, Widelitz RB, Jiang TX, Chuong CM: The developmental biology of feather follicles. Int J Dev Biol. 2004, 48: 181-191.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green EL: Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments. 1981, London: MacMillan Publishers LtdView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bailey NTJ: Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Genetic Linkage. 1961, London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute: SAS® User's Guide: Statistics. 1988, Cary, SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.