- Research article
- Open Access
The variable number of tandem repeats element in DAT1 regulates in vitro dopamine transporter density
© VanNess et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 11 July 2005
- Accepted: 27 November 2005
- Published: 27 November 2005
A 40-bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism exists in the 15th exon of DAT1, the gene encoding the human dopamine transporter (DAT). Though the VNTR resides in a region encoding the 3' untranslated region (UTR) and does not alter the protein's amino acid sequence, the prevalent 10-repeat variant has shown both linkage and association to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). In this study, we examined the effects of the DAT1 VNTR on measures of in vitro DAT expression and pharmacology. A series of four DAT1 constructs, each containing the DAT1 coding region, but varying with respect to the downstream presence or content of the 3'UTR, were engineered and stably transfected into an HEK-293 variant using Flp-In integration, an enzyme-mediated, site-specific recombination technology.
[3H] Win 35,428 saturation binding assays and DAT immunoblots revealed statistically significant differences in DAT expression attributable to DAT1 genotype. Cells harboring the 10-repeat DAT1 variant were characterized by a Bmax approximately 50% greater than cells with the 9-repeat VNTR; those containing only the DAT1 coding region or the coding region flanked by a truncated 3' UTR resulted in greater DAT density than either of the naturalistic 9- and 10-repeat variants. Competition binding assays showed no statistically significant DAT1 genotype effects on the DAT affinity for methylphenidate, a finding consistent with the positional location of the VNTR.
This study identified the DAT1 VNTR as a functional polymorphism and provides an interpretive framework for its association with behavioral phenotypes.
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Host Cell Line
- DAT1 Construct
- Saturation Binding Assay
The human dopamine transporter (hDAT), one member of a family of Na+/Cl- dependent transmembrane transport proteins, serves as a critical regulator of dopaminergic neurotransmission throughout much of the brain. The ~64 kb DAT1 gene (SLC6A3) that encodes the DAT includes 15 exons separated by 14 introns . Concurrent with the cloning and chromosomal mapping of DAT1 to the short arm of chromosome 5 , a VNTR polymorphism was identified in the 15th exon, a region encoding the transcript's 3' UTR [3, 4]. The 40-bp VNTR element is repeated between 3–13 times and in most human populations occurs with greatest frequency in the 9- and 10-repeat forms [5–7]. This polymorphic variation may be evolutionarily young, as a VNTR homologue has been observed in humans, chimpanzees, and cynomologus macaques, but not in lower mammals including the rat and mouse [8–10]. Though the VNTR resides in the 3'UTR and therefore does not affect the protein's amino acid sequence, regulatory factors such as mRNA stability and nuclear transport, and protein synthesis are potentially regulated by such variations [11–14].
Given the prominent role of dopamine neurotransmission in normal and abnormal behaviors, the DAT1 VNTR became the object of numerous genetic linkage and association studies [15–20], in vitro reporter gene experiments [21–26], in vivo SPECT molecular imaging studies [27–30], and pharmacogenetic examinations of the well-documented inter-individual variation in the response to treatment with DAT inhibitors [31–34]. Reports of the association of the DAT1 VNTR with ADHD have garnered particular attention, with the balance of evidence relating the 10-repeat VNTR to symptoms of the disorder . Despite its high frequency in the general population  and an absence of studies addressing possible effects of the VNTR on measures of DAT physiology and pharmacology, the 10-repeat DAT1 allele has become generally recognized as a "high risk" allele for ADHD.
The present study utilized radioligand binding and immunoblotting techniques to compare in vitro DAT density and ligand affinity across a series of cell lines stably transfected with constructs containing the DAT1 coding region flanked downstream by one of four DAT1 3'UTR variants. Flp-mediated recombination, one of a family of site-specific recombination technologies, was used to integrate the DAT1 constructs into a common, transcriptionally-active region of the genome, eliminating several caveats associated with traditional reporter gene methodologies . Flp recombinase, the enzymatic basis of the system, is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived enzyme that utilizes a substrate Flp recombination target (FRT) sequence upstream of a gene of interest (GOI) to site-specifically insert the GOI into a target site in a host cell line, thereby providing a well-controlled approach to establishing the in vitro functional effect of the DAT1 VNTR polymorphism on the DAT .
DAT binding assays
DAT western blots
The VNTR polymorphism of DAT1, though residing outside the gene's coding region, is of interest due to its possible influence on the regulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission, its implication in conferring genetic vulnerability for ADHD, and its putative role in modulating response to treatment with a first line medication, methylphenidate. The VNTR has not, however, been characterized as regards its possible influence on DAT physiology and pharmacology. Accumulating evidence that the 3'UTR influences the nuclear export, polyadenylation, subcellular targeting and rates of transcription and degradation of mRNA  supports the possibility that a VNTR polymorphism in this region could exert a regulatory influence on gene function. Observed DAT1 VNTR effects on reporter gene expression have provided initial support for an effect of the VNTR on in vitro gene expression [21–26], though the results vary widely (see  for discussion). Furthermore, heterologous reporter gene methodologies are subject to context-specific effects that may not reflect a sequence's impact on a gene of interest . The present study provides multiple lines of converging in vitro evidence for the DAT1 VNTR's modulatory effect on DAT expression, thus supporting it as a functional polymorphism that may contribute to the recognized inter-individual differences in DAT density and dopaminergic function.
The hDAT cell line, which lacks a 3'UTR altogether, displayed the highest overall DAT density and immunoreactivity, with a Bmax for [3H] Win 35,428 binding roughly 2.5-fold that of the hDAT 9 line. The hDAT Zero cell line had a Bmax for [3H] Win 35,428 binding ~25% less than that of the hDAT construct, a result that implicates the first ~800 bp of the DAT1 3'UTR in diminishing DAT1 transcription, mRNA stability, or translation. The additional extension of the 3'UTR to include either the 9 or 10 repeat variant further attenuated Bmax and DAT immunoreactivity compared to that for the hDAT and hDAT Zero cell lines. These results are consistent with the results of reporter gene assays [13, 25] in which constructs containing the VNTR polymorphism were associated with decreased DAT1 expression. Incremental attenuation of DAT density by both the ~800 bp fragment and the VNTR region suggests the presence of at least two regulatory regions in the DAT1 15th exon, with the differential effects of the 9- and 10-repeat variants possibly due to interactions between a VNTR-specific attenuator and one contained within the ~800 bp fragment.
Comparison of the 9- and 10-repeat variants, the two most frequent allelic variations of DAT1 [5, 7] revealed that DAT binding site density for the 10-repeat VNTR was elevated approximately 50% over that of the 9-repeat allele, with western analysis confirming this finding. This result indicates that the 3'UTR does not simply mediate a length-dependent reduction in DAT availability, as has been previously suggested . Rather, variation in the number of tandem repeats appears to have distinct modulatory influences on in vitro DAT density.
At least five groups have reported in vitro reporter gene results examining the relative effects of the DAT1 9- and 10-repeat VNTR's influence on luciferase or GFP expression in transiently transfected systems. Fuke and coworkers compared the impact of DAT1 3'UTRs containing the 7-, 9- and 10-repeat alleles on luciferase reporter activity . Their results suggested that the 10-repeat allele yielded the greatest reporter gene expression. Additionally, it was found that constructs harboring the VNTR polymorphism (of any variety) resulted in lower reporter gene expression than those with no repeat region; our data largely concurs with these observations. However, Inoue-Murayama and colleagues , who assessed the relative luciferase activities associated with the human 9-, 10- and 11-repeat alleles in addition to several non-human primate DAT1 VNTRs, reported an inverse relationship between reporter gene activity and repeat number, an observation consistent with possible length-dependent reductions in transfection efficiency, and a finding that differs from our data. Miller and Madras  arrived at similar findings (i.e. 9 > 10), though their analysis suggested that an additional SNP located in the 3'UTR may further regulate the VNTR's effects. Lastly, Mill , who recently published a well-controlled set of reporter gene analyses using both neuronal and non-neuronal cell lines, found no significant difference in reporter gene activity attributable to VNTR copy number. These discrepant studies underscore the need to examine the DAT1 VNTR effects under carefully controlled experimental conditions using the DAT protein itself as the reporter signal.
The veracity of our findings is reinforced by the use of a targeted stable integration protocol that eliminates confounds to construct comparison attributable to variable transfection efficiency or clonal variance, both common pitfalls of transient transfection or conventional non-targeted stable integration approaches. Unlike typical stable integration methods, the enzymatically-mediated Flp-In system employed herein resulted in DAT-expressing cell lines with their respective constructs directionally integrated at a common, transcriptionally-active locus [39–41]. pcDNA5/FRT's hygromycin resistance gene, which was used in the isolation and expansion of cell lines for this study, lacks both a promoter and start codon, thereby preventing selection in instances of random genomic insertion. When enzymatically integrated into the host cell line, however, the gene becomes properly aligned with both a promoter and initiation sequence, permitting expression of the hygromycin resistance gene and DAT1 variant from a common site. This targeted stable integration approach eliminates the need to normalize data to account for differential transfection efficiency, a significant confound of most traditional reporter gene methodologies.
The current findings are particularly interesting considering the divergent results of four in vivo human [123I] β-CIT SPECT studies examining the impact of the DAT1 VNTR polymorphism on measures of striatal DAT binding potential [27–30]. The first study, conducted in a mixed population of abstinent alcoholics and healthy controls, found that 10-repeat homozygotes displayed a 22% higher DAT binding density than 9/10 heterozygotes . A similar study conducted in a population of healthy subjects revealed sharply different results, with 10-repeat homozygotes characterized by striatal DAT binding 13.4% lower than subjects carrying a 9-repeat allele ; van Dyck  recently arrived at similar findings. Martinez , also utilizing [123I] β-CIT, studied a mixed population of 59 healthy controls and schizophrenics and found no difference in binding potential between 10-repeat homozygotes and carriers of the 9-repeat allele. Though these studies differ widely in their conclusions, a number of factors may have contributed to the varied results. Foremost, subject populations varied from healthy individuals to those with psychiatric diagnoses characterized by probable dopaminergic dysregulation. Second, the use of [123I] β-CIT, a high affinity DAT ligand, but one lacking selectivity for the DAT over the serotonin transporter, highlights the need to conduct experiments using more selective ligands, preferably in a PET setting [42, 43]. Third, two of these studies focused exclusively on the DAT1 VNTR polymorphism and did not consider other polymorphisms capable of modulating [123I] β-CIT binding (e.g. SERT promoter VNTR polymorphism known to modulate 5-HT transporter density ); given [123I] β-CIT's binding profile and the partially overlapping brain regional distribution of DAT and SERT, a portion of the between-study variance may be attributable to variations in genes encoding other monoamine transporters. In light of these limitations, PET imaging with highly selective DAT ligands  remains the best in vivo approach to assessing whether the observed in vitro effects of the DAT1 VNTR on DAT expression generalizes to the in situ DAT.
Of interest are the small, though statistically significant, effects of 3'UTR variations on DAT affinity for [3H] Win 35,428. Given the location of the VNTR polymorphism, genotype-dependent variations in the DAT affinity would not be predicted. Preliminary data from our laboratory suggests that VNTR-dependent rates of DAT protein glycosylation may account for the observed variance in ligand affinity, a hypothesis subject to ongoing testing in our laboratory.
While the present study provides evidence supporting the DAT1 VNTR as a functional polymorphism, the strength of this assertion is tempered by the inherent limitations of the experimental approach. First, despite the magnitude and reproducibility of the observed effects in the present in vitro study, these effects may not generalize to the in vivo condition. The association of the 10-repeat allele with an increase in the amount of in vitro DAT protein could be attenuated by in vivo counter-regulatory mechanisms including upregulation of lysosomal DAT targeting and modulation in rates of endosome-mediated DAT internalization [46–48]. The current experiments, conducted in membrane homogenates, do not discriminate between DAT proteins functionally inserted into the cell membrane and those contained within cellular vesicles. Secondly, the scope of the present study was limited to the effects of the VNTR region independent of other SNP or haplotype effects that may contribute to variability in dopaminergic function; our experiments, by design, do not reflect the recognized complexity of interactions affecting DAT1 expression [17, 24]. Third, our experiments utilized the powerful CMV promoter; while the use of strong viral promoters is common in experiments such as this, possible promoter/VNTR interactions have been suggested . Therefore, different effects may be observed if the CMV promoter was substituted with either the native DAT1 promoter or a weaker constitutively active sequence. Lastly, our results are limited to the effects of the DAT1 VNTR in Flp-In 293 cells, a cell line that may lack certain tissue-specific regulatory factors found in DAT rich tissues. While it would be of interest to study these effects in dopaminergic neurons in combination with Flp-In integration, such an approach would render it difficult to pharmacologically distinguish between native and transfected DAT and would significantly compromise the otherwise high degree of experimental control characteristic of the present experiments.
Though the DAT1 3'UTR is lengthier than the transcript's entire coding region, is a likely target for modulating DAT1 translation, and has been associated with symptoms of ADHD, there exists the possibility of linkage disequilibrium between the DAT1 3'UTR and a separate, yet unidentified, causal genetic element. Still, these findings have interpretive significance to the often-observed association of the 10-repeat DAT1 VNTR with ADHD. ADHD is viewed as being related to a deficit in synaptic dopamine subserving task-specific signaling. An increase in DAT expression in 10-allele carriers could result in such a dopamine deficit state, depleting dopamine's ability to task-specifically increase signal to noise ratios in target neurons [49, 50] and result in deficits in attention and impulse control.
Cloning of DAT1 variants
Four DAT1 constructs were created, each containing a common promoter, coding region, and poly (A) tail, but varying with respect to the presence and length of the 3'UTR. All constructs were restriction mapped and sequence verified throughout the length of the insert prior to targeted stable transfection in Flp-In 293 cells. Though the sequence of these clones is nearly indistinguishable from that predicted by public genomic databases, they are not eligible for Genbank submission due to the mixed origin (cDNA and genomic DNA) of the constructs. Since the sequence variance in and around DAT1 is complex, we have included as supplemental material to this manuscript the complete annotated sequence of each construct (Additional file 1). The constructs, presented in order of increasing length, are depicted in Figure 1 and were generated as follows:
The pRC/CMV plasmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) containing the DAT1 coding region was obtained (courtesy of Dr. Marc Caron, Duke University) and the insert released via digestion with PmeI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA). The resultant fragments were electrophoretically resolved on 1.5% agarose and the band containing the DAT1 coding region was purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). Similarly, pcDNA5/FRT was digested with PmeI, the vector backbone purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit) and treated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase. The DAT1 insert underwent blunt end ligation into the pcDNA5/FRT backbone by overnight reaction at 14°C with T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs).
An ~800 bp segment of the DAT1 3'UTR beginning upstream of the stop codon and terminating proximal to the VNTR element was cloned from banked human DNA into pCR 2.1 TOPO using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen). Oligos DAT1 E15F (5'-CAACCACAGTCTCGCGGCTTT-3') and DAT1 E15ZeroR (5'CTCAGGCCGTTCCCTACACC-3') were used in conjunction with Platinum Pfx DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen) to drive 35 cycles of PCR using the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Following initial amplification, 1 U of Taq polymerase was added to the reaction mixture and incubated at 72°C for 10 minutes; the resultant PCR product with 3' A-overhangs was used immediately in a TOPO-TA cloning reaction. After transforming competent bacteria and identifying clones containing the insert of interest, the fragment containing the 3'UTR was released via restriction digestion with BsmBI and XbaI (New England Biolabs), band purified, and cloned into a BsmBI/XbaI site in the pRC/CMV plasmid immediately downstream of the DAT1 coding region. The resultant clone contained an insert consisting of the DAT1 coding region flanked by a ~800 bp fragment of the 3'UTR up to, but not including, the VNTR region. This construct was subcloned into the pcDNA5/FRT plasmid via the same blunt end cloning method used in the generation of the hDAT plasmid.
hDAT9 and hDAT10
The DAT1 15th exon from a previously genotyped 9/10 heterozygote was PCR amplified and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO using a protocol similar to that used in the generation of the hDAT Zero construct. Primers DAT1 E15F (sequence previously noted) and DAT1 E15R (5'-AGGGACCCACACGATGCTGA-3') were used to produce a ~2100 bp PCR product that was subsequently made TOPO-TA compatible through the previously described A-overhang procedure. TOPO-TA reactions were immediately performed and used to transform competent bacteria. Ampicillin-resistant bacterial colonies were isolated and grown overnight using standard culture conditions. Plasmid DNA was isolated and genotyped to differentiate those containing the 9-repeat versus the 10-repeat VNTR via a protocol that has been previously described . Following identification of clones containing the 9 and 10 repeat VNTRs, respectively, the insert containing the entire 3'UTR was released via restriction digestion with BsmBI and XbaI. The band was purified via gel extraction and cloned into a BsmBI/XbaI site in the original pRC/CMV plasmid. The resultant clones contained an insert consisting of the DAT1 coding region flanked by a ~1900 bp fragment of the 3'UTR harboring either the 9 or 10 repeat variant. The insert was subcloned into the pcDNA5/FRT plasmid via the previously described protocol.
Creation and maintenance of stably transfected model cell system
The Flp-In 293 host cell line (Invitrogen), an HEK-293 variant containing a Flp-In recombination site at a transcriptionally active locus, was grown in complete medium (D-MEM with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% FBS, 1% penn/strep) supplemented with 100 μg/mL Zeocin in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2. 48-hours prior to transfection, cells were split into 6-well plates and grown to ~80% confluence on the day of transfection and incubated in complete medium lacking Zeocin. Cells were co-transfected with one of the four DAT1 variants and pOG44 (Invitrogen), a plasmid encoding the Flp-recombinase enzyme necessary for targeted stable integration . The Lipofectamine 2000 reagent was used to transfect the cells according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol (Invitrogen). Briefly, 3.6 μg pOG44 and 0.4 μg of one of the four DAT1 constructs were diluted to a 250 μl volume in Opti-MEM reduced serum media (Invitrogen); similarly, 10 μL Lipofectamine 2000 was diluted to a volume of 250 μL and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. The diluted DNA and Lipofectamine solutions were combined and incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes and then added to culture medium. 24-hours after transfection, cells were washed with PBS and fresh complete medium was again added. 48-hours after transfection, cells were split into fresh medium, plated on 150 mm × 25 mm cell culture dishes, and incubated at 37°C until cells attached. Medium was then removed and replaced with complete medium supplemented with the selecting antibiotic hygromycin (100 μg/mL). Selective media was replaced every 4 days until hygromycin-resistant foci were identified. Single resistant colonies were encircled with a cloning cylinder, dislodged with 0.25% trypsin, and expanded. Cells exhibiting the phenotype for proper Flp-In recombination and demonstrating the presence of a cocaine-sensitive DAT as assessed by a rapid single concentration [3H] dopamine uptake assay were selected; clones were expanded to confluence in 2-tray (1264 cm2) Nunc Cell Factories (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA). Once confluent, the four cell lines were harvested with 37°C PBS containing 0.53 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, separated into aliquots, and centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min. Supernatants were decanted and the pellets were rinsed with 37°C PBS. Pellets were again centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min, the supernatants decanted, and the pellets stored at -80°C until the time of assay. Mock transfected cells were confirmed to have no specific DAT binding or immunoreactivity prior to initiation of assays.
General radioligand binding methods
Binding assays were carried out in 0.03 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.32 M sucrose. Membrane suspensions were prepared by resuspending the pellet in 7 mL of ice cold assay buffer followed by homogenization with a Polytron PT3000 for 20 seconds at 20,000 rpm. All assays were performed in 12 × 75 mm polystyrene tubes in a 1,000 μL final volume consisting of 800 μL of assay buffer, 100 μL of [3H] Win 35,428 (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA), and 100 μL of cell membrane suspension. Competition assays were performed in a final volume of 1,000 μl consisting of 700 μl assay buffer, 100 μL of [3H] Win 35,428, 100 μL of methylphenidate HCl (10-10 to 10-6 M) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and 100 μl of cell suspension. Nonspecific binding was defined via the addition of 25 μM cocaine HCl (Sigma-Aldrich). Incubations were terminated via rapid vacuum filtration through GF/B filters presoaked in assay buffer containing 0.3% polyethyleneimine and rinsed with three washes (5 mL) of ice cold assay buffer. Filters were punched, placed in scintillation vials, and equilibrated overnight in 6 mL of liquid scintillation cocktail (Ultima Gold, Packard, Meriden, CT, USA). Vials were shaken and radioactivity determined in a liquid scintillation counter at 50% efficiency for 240 sec/vial.
Saturation binding assays
The DAT radioligand [3H] Win 35,428 was isotopically diluted with freshly weighed cold ligand (courtesy of Dr. Michael Kuhar, Emory University) in silanized borosilicate glass tubes. Drug was initially dissolved in assay buffer containing 5 mmol/L HCl at a concentration of 1 μg/μL followed by serial dilution with assay buffer. Saturation binding assays utilized final [3H] Win 35,428 concentrations over a range of 0.5 to 75 nM. Total and nonspecific binding was determined in triplicate at each concentration of ligand. Assays were initiated by the addition of membrane suspension and incubated at 4°C for 4 hours.
Competition binding assays
[3H] Win 35,428 was isotopically diluted with freshly weighed cold ligand in silanized borosilicate glass tubes as previously described. The concentration used in competition assays (5.85 nM) approximated the mean K d for [3H] Win 35,428 binding to the DAT from the binding site saturation studies. Methylphenidate was dissolved in assay buffer containing 5 mmol/L HCl at an initial concentration of 1 μg/μl. The concentrated solution subsequently underwent serial dilution to generate final concentrations of competing ligand ranging from 0.01 to 10,000 nM. Assays were initiated by the addition of membrane suspension, and incubated at 25°C for 1 hour.
At the time of each saturation binding assay, twelve 100 μL aliquots of each membrane homogenate were collected for purposes of measuring total mean protein content with a BCA protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Protein assay results were used in the normalization of saturation binding data to account for minor differences in total added tissue.
Cell pellets were homogenized in PBS in the presence of DNAse and protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Samples were then enzymatically deglycosylated (Enzymatic Protein Deglycosylation Kit, Sigma-Aldrich) prior to the loading and electrophoretic resolution of 20 μg total protein in sample buffer (40 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 0.1% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.025% Bromphenol blue) on 10% acrylamide. DAT, a highly glycosylated protein, typically runs as a smear of high molecular weight bands; deglycosylation reduces the core protein to a mass of ~50 kD and greatly aids densitometry analysis. An example of mature, fully-glycosylated DAT and the resultant high molecular weight smear is included as supplemental material (Additional file 2) to demonstrate the significant benefit of sample deglycosylation. BioRad's Precision Plus Protein Standards (Hercules, CA, USA) were loaded into the first lane of each gel. Gels were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) overnight at 3 mA. Membranes were blocked for 1 hour at RT (SuperBlock Blocking Buffer, Pierce Biotechnology) on an orbital shaker and probed with a rat anti-DAT monoclonal antibody specific for the protein's N-terminal region (1:250 dilution, courtesy Dr. Allan Levey, Emory University) and rabbit anti 14-3-3β polyclonal antibody (1:500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at room temperature for 1 hour. Following rinsing, the blot was incubated with a 1:10,000 dilution of both Alexa Fluor 680 conjugated anti-rat IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and IRDye-800 conjugated Anti-Rabbit IgG (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were rinsed, dried and visualized using a LI-COR Biosciences Odyssey Infrared imager (Lincoln, NE, USA). The ubiquitously expressed 14-3-3β was used as a protein loading control. Western analyses were conducted in triplicate.
Radioligand binding data
In vitro pharmacological characteristics of DAT1 variants.
Bmax (± S.E.M)
7747 (± 360)
5913 (± 308)
3021 (± 286)
4669 (± 480)
Kd (± S.E.M)
5.44 (± 0.55)
7.77 (± 0.41)
4.98 (± 0.20)
6.69 (± 0.57)
Ki (± S.E.M)
24.77 (± 1.14)
29.13 (± 1.81)
25.00 (± 0.10)
33.39 (± 4.15)
Western blot analysis
Western blots underwent densitometric analysis using the program ImageJ 1.33 u (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). The DAT signal was normalized to the 14-3-3β signal within each lane (expressed in arbitrary units), then subsequently examined for main effects of DAT1 genotype via a one way ANOVA with a Holm-Sidak post hoc comparison. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Marc Caron for generously supplying the DAT1 starting material, Dr. Allan Levey and Mr. Craig Heilman for assistance with DAT western blots, Dr. Michael Kuhar for advice, and Elyse Katz and Dina Ghoneim for technical assistance. This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH067939) and by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32 DA015040).
- Kawarai T, Kawakami H, Yamamura Y, Nakamura S: Structure and organization of the gene encoding human dopamine transporter. Gene. 1997, 195 (1): 11-18. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00131-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giros B, el Mestikawy S, Godinot N, Zheng K, Han H, Yang-Feng T, Caron MG: Cloning, pharmacological characterization, and chromosome assignment of the human dopamine transporter. Mol Pharmacol. 1992, 42 (3): 383-390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vandenbergh DJ, Persico AM, Uhl GR: A human dopamine transporter cDNA predicts reduced glycosylation, displays a novel repetitive element and provides racially-dimorphic TaqI RFLPs. Brain Research Molecular Brain Research. 1992, 15 (1-2): 161-166. 10.1016/0169-328X(92)90165-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vandenbergh DJ, Persico AM, Hawkins AL, Griffin CA, Li X, Jabs EW, Uhl GR: Human dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) maps to chromosome 5p15.3 and displays a VNTR. Genomics. 1992, 14 (4): 1104-1106. 10.1016/S0888-7543(05)80138-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell RJ, Howlett S, Earl L, White NG, McComb J, Schanfield MS, Briceno I, Papiha SS, Osipova L, Livshits G, Leonard WR, Crawford MH: Distribution of the 3' VNTR polymorphism in the human dopamine transporter gene in world populations. Hum Biol. 2000, 72 (2): 295-304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doucette-Stamm LA, Blakely DJ, Tian J, Mockus S, Mao JI: Population genetic study of the human dopamine transporter gene (DAT1). Genetic Epidemiology. 1995, 12 (3): 303-308. 10.1002/gepi.1370120307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang AM, Palmatier MA, Kidd KK: Global variation of a 40-bp VNTR in the 3'-untranslated region of the dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3). Biol Psychiatry. 1999, 46 (2): 151-160. 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00101-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimada S, Kitayama S, Lin CL, Patel A, Nanthakumar E, Gregor P, Kuhar M, Uhl G: Cloning and expression of a cocaine-sensitive dopamine transporter complementary DNA. Science. 1991, 254 (5031): 576-578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu X, Gu HH: Molecular cloning of the mouse dopamine transporter and pharmacological comparison with the human homologue. Gene. 1999, 233 (1-2): 163-170. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00143-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller GM, De La Garza RD, Novak MA, Madras BK: Single nucleotide polymorphisms distinguish multiple dopamine transporter alleles in primates: implications for association with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry. 2001, 6 (1): 50-58. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conne B, Stutz A, Vassalli JD: The 3' untranslated region of messenger RNA: A molecular 'hotspot' for pathology?. Nat Med. 2000, 6 (6): 637-641. 10.1038/76211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura Y, Koyama K, Matsushima M: VNTR (variable number of tandem repeat) sequences as transcriptional, translational, or functional regulators. J Hum Genet. 1998, 43 (3): 149-152. 10.1007/s100380050059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuke S, Sasagawa N, Ishiura S: Identification and characterization of the Hesr1/Hey1 as a candidate trans-acting factor on gene expression through the 3' non-coding polymorphic region of the human dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene. J Biochem (Tokyo). 2005, 137 (2): 205-216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mignone F, Gissi C, Liuni S, Pesole G: Untranslated regions of mRNAs. Genome Biol. 2002, 3 (3): REVIEWS0004-10.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews0004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cook EHJ, Stein MA, Krasowski MD, Cox NJ, Olkon DM, Kieffer JE, Leventhal BL: Association of attention-deficit disorder and the dopamine transporter gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1995, 56 (4): 993-998.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly G, Hawi Z, Fitzgerald M, Gill M: Mapping susceptibility loci in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: preferential transmission of parental alleles at DAT1, DBH and DRD5 to affected children. Molecular Psychiatry. 1999, 4 (2): 192-196. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barr CL, Xu C, Kroft J, Feng Y, Wigg K, Zai G, Tannock R, Schachar R, Malone M, Roberts W, Nothen MM, Grunhage F, Vandenbergh DJ, Uhl G, Sunohara G, King N, Kennedy JL: Haplotype study of three polymorphisms at the dopamine transporter locus confirm linkage to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2001, 49 (4): 333-339. 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01053-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gill M, Daly G, Heron S, Hawi Z, Fitzgerald M: Confirmation of association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and a dopamine transporter polymorphism. Mol Psychiatry. 1997, 2 (4): 311-313. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waldman ID, Rowe DC, Abramowitz A, Kozel ST, Mohr JH, Sherman SL, Cleveland HH, Sanders ML, Gard JM, Stever C: Association and linkage of the dopamine transporter gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: heterogeneity owing to diagnostic subtype and severity. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63 (6): 1767-1776. 10.1086/302132.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CK, Chen SL, Mill J, Huang YS, Lin SK, Curran S, Purcell S, Sham P, Asherson P: The dopamine transporter gene is associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a Taiwanese sample. Mol Psychiatry. 2003, 8 (4): 393-396. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuke S, Suo S, Takahashi N, Koike H, Sasagawa N, Ishiura S: The VNTR polymorphism of the human dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene affects gene expression. The Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2001, 1: 152-156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue-Murayama M, Adachi S, Mishima N, Mitani H, Takenaka O, Terao K, Hayasaka I, Ito S, Murayama Y: Variation of variable number of tandem repeat sequences in the 3'-untranslated region of primate dopamine transporter genes that affects reporter gene expression. Neurosci Lett. 2002, 334 (3): 206-210. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01125-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michelhaugh SK: The dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3) variable number of tandem repeats domain enhances transcription in dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2001, 79 (5): 1033-1038. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00647.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenwood TA, Kelsoe JR: Promoter and intronic variants affect the transcriptional regulation of the human dopamine transporter gene. Genomics. 2003, 82 (5): 511-520. 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00142-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mill J, Asherson P, Craig I, D'Souza UM: Transient expression analysis of allelic variants of a VNTR in the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1). BMC Genet. 2005, 6 (1): 3-10.1186/1471-2156-6-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller GM, Madras BK: Polymorphisms in the 3'-untranslated region of human and monkey dopamine transporter genes affect reporter gene expression. Mol Psychiatry. 2002, 7 (1): 44-55. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001921.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez D, Gelernter J, Abi-Dargham A, van Dyck CH, Kegeles L, Innis RB, Laruelle M: The variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism of the dopamine transporter gene is not associated with significant change in dopamine transporter phenotype in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001, 24 (5): 553-560. 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00216-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsen LK, Staley JK, Zoghbi SS, Seibyl JP, Kosten TR, Innis RB, Gelernter J: Prediction of dopamine transporter binding availability by genotype: a preliminary report. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2000, 157 (10): 1700-1703. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heinz A, Goldman D, Jones DW, Palmour R, Hommer D, Gorey JG, Lee KS, Linnoila M, Weinberger DR: Genotype influences in vivo dopamine transporter availability in human striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000, 22 (2): 133-139. 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00099-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Dyck CH, Malison RT, Jacobsen LK, Seibyl JP, Staley JK, Laruelle M, Baldwin RM, Innis RB, Gelernter J: Increased Dopamine Transporter Availability Associated with the 9-Repeat Allele of the SLC6A3 Gene. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2005, 46 (5): 745-751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirley A, Lowe N, Hawi Z, Mullins C, Daly G, Waldman I, McCarron M, O'Donnell D, Fitzgerald M, Gill M: Association of the 480 bp DAT1 allele with methylphenidate response in a sample of Irish children with ADHD. Am J Med Genet. 2003, 121B (1): 50-54. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winsberg BG, Comings DE: Association of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) with poor methylphenidate response [see comments]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999, 38 (12): 1474-1477. 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein MA, Waldman ID, Sarampote CS, Seymour KE, Robb AS, Conlon C, Kim SJ, Cook EH: Dopamine transporter genotype and methylphenidate dose response in children with ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005, 30 (7): 1374-1382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheon KA, Ryu YH, Kim JW, Cho DY: The homozygosity for 10-repeat allele at dopamine transporter gene and dopamine transporter density in Korean children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: relating to treatment response to methylphenidate. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005, 15 (1): 95-101. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swanson JM, Flodman P, Kennedy J, Spence MA, Moyzis R, Schuck S, Murias M, Moriarity J, Barr C, Smith M, Posner M: Dopamine genes and ADHD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000, 24 (1): 21-25. 10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00062-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sauer B: Site-specific recombination: developments and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994, 5 (5): 521-527. 10.1016/0958-1669(94)90068-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Gorman S, Fox DT, Wahl GM: Recombinase-mediated gene activation and site-specific integration in mammalian cells. Science. 1991, 251 (4999): 1351-1355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang K, Kurachi S, Kurachi K: Limitation in use of heterologous reporter genes for gene promoter analysis. Silencer activity associated with the cloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (7): 4826-4830. 10.1074/jbc.M211361200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones JR, Shelton KD, Magnuson MA: Strategies for the use of site-specific recombinases in genome engineering. Methods Mol Med. 2004, 103: 245-258.Google Scholar
- Kolb AF: Genome engineering using site-specific recombinases. Cloning Stem Cells. 2002, 4 (1): 65-80. 10.1089/153623002753632066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wirth D, Hauser H: Flp-mediated integration of expression cassettes into FRT-tagged chromosomal loci in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2004, 267: 467-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kula NS, Baldessarini RJ, Tarazi FI, Fisser R, Wang S, Trometer J, Neumeyer JL: [3H]beta-CIT: a radioligand for dopamine transporters in rat brain tissue. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999, 385 (2-3): 291-294. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00695-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis MR, Votaw JR, Bremner JD, Byas-Smith MG, Faber TL, Voll RJ, Hoffman JM, Grafton ST, Kilts CD, Goodman MM: Initial human PET imaging studies with the dopamine transporter ligand 18F-FECNT. J Nucl Med. 2003, 44 (6): 855-861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du L, Faludi G, Palkovits M, Demeter E, Bakish D, Lapierre YD, Sotonyi P, Hrdina PD: Frequency of long allele in serotonin transporter gene is increased in depressed suicide victims. Biol Psychiatry. 1999, 46 (2): 196-201. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00376-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodman MM, Kilts CD, Keil R, Shi B, Martarello L, Xing D, Votaw J, Ely TD, Lambert P, Owens MJ, Camp VM, Malveaux E, Hoffman JM: 18F-labeled FECNT: a selective radioligand for PET imaging of brain dopamine transporters. Nucl Med Biol. 2000, 27 (1): 1-12. 10.1016/S0969-8051(99)00080-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melikian HE, Buckley KM: Membrane trafficking regulates the activity of the human dopamine transporter. J Neurosci. 1999, 19 (18): 7699-7710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pristupa ZB, McConkey F, Liu F, Man HY, Lee FJ, Wang YT, Niznik HB: Protein kinase-mediated bidirectional trafficking and functional regulation of the human dopamine transporter. Synapse. 1998, 30 (1): 79-87. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199809)30:1<79::AID-SYN10>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loder MK, Melikian HE: The dopamine transporter constitutively internalizes and recycles in a protein kinase C-regulated manner in stably transfected PC12 cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (24): 22168-22174. 10.1074/jbc.M301845200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nicola SM, Woodward Hopf F, Hjelmstad GO: Contrast enhancement: a physiological effect of striatal dopamine?. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 318 (1): 93-106. 10.1007/s00441-004-0929-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Donnell P: Dopamine gating of forebrain neural ensembles. Eur J Neurosci. 2003, 17 (3): 429-435. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02463.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dymecki SM: Flp recombinase promotes site-specific DNA recombination in embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (12): 6191-6196. 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6191.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.