Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons of SNPs and microsatellites for main effect and two-way interaction effect screening. Both microsatellite and SNP analyses show a strong and frequent main effect in chromosome 4, whereas epistatic effects are located differently.

From: A Bayesian genome screening of maximum number of drinks as an alcoholism phenotype with the new Haseman-Elston method

Ranking

Chromosome

Marginal posterior probabilities

Microsatellites

1

Chr 4

0.21133

2

Chr 6, Chr 13, Chr 16

0.15433

3

Chr 4 (2 markersa), Chr 10

0.13922

4

Chr 23, Chr 17, Chr 7

0.09066

5

Chr 23, Chr 2

0.08533

6

Chr 1

0.08466

7

Chr 13

0.07577

8

Chr 16

0.07422

9

Chr 14 (2 markers)

0.07266

10

Chr 7

0.06944

11

Chr 17

0.06922

12

Chr 3

0.06622

13

Chr 20

0.05766

14

Chr 8 × Chr 15b

0.05644

15

Chr 10 × Chr 17b

0.03244

SNPs

1

Chr 4

0.2068

2

Chr 4 (2 markersa)

0.1793

3

Chr 23

0.1786

4

Chr 4

0.1725

5

Gender

0.1703

6

Chr 3, Chr 13

0.1563

7

Chr 23

0.1516

8

Chr 23 × sexb

0.1461

9

Chr 23

0.1295

10

Chr 4, Chr 6

0.128

11

Chr 6, Chr 23

0.1256

12

Chr 3

0.1247

13

Chr 16

0.1237

14

Chr 7, Chr 4

0.1208

15

Chr 14

0.0209

  1. aTwo markers are ranked.
  2. b Epistatic effect between the two chromosomes