Table 2 Bayesian approach resultsa with (Y) or without (N) "population" covariate.
Replicate Number | Covariate | Chromosome 1 | Chromosome 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â |
|
| 95% CS |
|
| 95% CS |
1 | Y | 1.000 | 166.70 | (163, 171) | 1.000 | 297.99 | (294, 304) |
| Â | N | 1.000 | 166.68 | (163, 172) | 1.000 | 297.32 | (294, 302) |
2 | Y | 0.983 | 172.43 | (165, 178) | 0.696 | - | - |
| Â | N | 0.947 | 171.41 | (161, 178) | 0.787 | 299.07 | (291, 306) |
3 | Y | 1.000 | 169.67 | (165, 175) | 0.993 | 298.92 | (292, 306) |
| Â | N | 1.000 | 169.86 | (165, 176) | 0.994 | 297.60 | (292, 306) |
4 | Y | 1.000 | 164.30 | (161, 169) | 0.999 | 300.12 | (294, 306) |
| Â | N | 1.000 | 164.22 | (159, 170) | 0.999 | 298.90 | (293, 306) |
5 | Y | 1.000 | 169.21 | (166, 173) | 1.000 | 296.91 | (294, 301) |
| Â | N | 1.000 | 168.71 | (165, 173) | 1.000 | 296.82 | (294, 300) |
| Â | Â | Chromosome 5 | Chromosome 9 | ||||
| Â | Â |
|
| 95% CS |
|
| 95% CS |
1 | Y | 0.996 | 0.00 | (0, 5) | 0.998 | 1.76 | (0, 10) |
| Â | N | 0.971 | 0.00 | (0, 6) | 0.981 | 2.22 | (0, 12) |
2 | Y | 1.000 | 8.02 | (4, 12) | 1.000 | 6.64 | (0, 11) |
| Â | N | 1.000 | 8.68 | (4, 13) | 0.998 | 6.61 | (0, 13) |
3 | Y | 1.000 | 3.14 | (0, 12) | 0.735 | 0.00 | (0, 10) |
| Â | N | 1.000 | 3.85 | (0, 12) | 0.172 | - | - |
4 | Y | 0.108 | - | - | 0.973 | 0.00 | (0, 9) |
| Â | N | 0.297 | - | - | 0.995 | 1.43 | (0, 9) |
5 | Y | 0.998 | 4.02 | (0, 12) | 0.001 | - | - |
| Â | N | 0.998 | 5.33 | (0, 12) | 0.001 | - | - |
- a
and 95% CS are the mean and (2.5th, 97.5th) percentiles of the estimated posterior distribution of d under linkage, respectively. and CS are reported only if posterior probability of linkage 
> 0.7. Note that the 0 in the lower limits of the CS and the values are due to the truncations of negative map positions that resulted from consideration of positions 10 cM before the first marker, for computational reasons.