Skip to main content

Table 2 P for AI, DA, KA, NY and combined populations

From: Performance comparison of two-point linkage methods using microsatellite markers flanking known disease locations

  

MMLS

MLS

KCLS

MOD

PPL

PPL-p

PPL-seq

AI

        
 

D1

60% a

30%

40%

54%

57%

  
 

D2

78%

76%

72%

75%

77%

  
 

D3

61%

70%

69%

62%

65%

  
 

D4

70%

67%

55%

67%

68%

  
 

D5

2%

3%

3%

2%

4%

  
 

D6

2%

1%

2%

1%

3%

  

DA

        
 

D1

97%

98%

98%

99%

100%

  
 

D2

76%

89%

90%

89%

90%

  
 

D3

4%

8%

10%

10%

15%

  
 

D4

6%

13% a

7%

11%

11%

  
 

D5

4%

7%

7%

6%

6%

  
 

D6

2%

2%

1%

4%

5%

  

KA

        
 

D1

20% a

16%

15%

20%

16%

  
 

D2

54%

58%

49%

48%

45%

  
 

D3

77%

93%

89%

88%

83%

  
 

D4

89%

89%

83%

93%

86%

  
 

D5

4%

4%

1%

4%

3%

  
 

D6

1%

2%

3%

1%

1%

  

NY

        
 

D1

6%

2%

8%

3%

15%

  
 

D2

32%

31%

43%

25%

61%

  
 

D3

4%

7%

28%

2%

24%

  
 

D4

0%

6%

10%

0%

2%

  
 

D5

0% a

0%

0%

0%

0%

  
 

D6

0%

1%

0%

0%

0%

  

Combined

        
 

D1

97%

95%

98%

97%

 

96%

100%

 

D2

100% a

100%

100%

100%

 

100%

100%

 

D3

90%

99%

100%

97%

 

95%

98%

 

D4

91%

99%

97%

92%

 

89%

95%

 

D5

1%

5%

2%

1%

 

1%

4%

 

D6

1%

2%

1%

0%

 

0%

0%

  1. aBold text indicates the method receiving the highest score at each population/locus.