- Research article
- Open Access
An investigation of the effects of lipid-lowering medications: genome-wide linkage analysis of lipids in the HyperGEN study
© Wu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 10 November 2006
- Accepted: 10 September 2007
- Published: 10 September 2007
Use of anti-hyperlipidemic medications compromises genetic analysis because of altered lipid profiles. We propose an empirical method to adjust lipid levels for medication effects so that the adjusted lipid values substitute the unmedicated lipid values in the genetic analysis.
Published clinical trials were reviewed for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibric acid derivatives as mono-drug therapy. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors showed similar effects in African Americans (AA) and non-African Americans (non-AA) for lowering total cholesterol (TC, -50.7 mg/dl), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C, -48.1 mg/dl), and triglycerides (TG, -19.7 mg/dl). Their effect on increasing HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) in AA (+0.4 mg/dl) was lower than in Non-AA (+2.3 mg/dl). The effects of fibric acid derivatives were estimated as -46.1 mg/dl for TC, -40.1 mg/dl for LDL-C, and +5.9 mg/dl for HDL-C in non-AA. The corresponding effects in AA were less extreme (-20.1 mg/dl, -11.4 mg/dl, and +3.1 mg/dl). Similar effect for TG (59.0 mg/dl) was shown in AA and non-AA. The above estimated effects were applied to a multipoint variance components linkage analysis on the lipid levels in 2,403 Whites and 2,214 AA in the HyperGEN study. The familial effects did vary depending on whether the lipids were adjusted for medication use. For example, the heritabilities increased after medication adjustment for TC and LDL-C, but did not change significantly for HDL-C and TG.
Ethnicity-specific medication adjustments using our empirical method can be employed in epidemiological and genetic analysis of lipids.
- Total Cholesterol
- African American
- Blood Lipid Level
- Fibric Acid Derivative
There is extensive epidemiological evidence showing that a dyslipidemic profile, characterized by elevated plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and reduced levels of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), is strongly associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease . Genetic contributions to plasma lipid levels also have been documented, with the magnitude as assessed by heritability being quite variable (26% to 83%) [2–4]. Similarly, genome scans from different populations have reported a variety of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) related to lipid profiles [5–13].
However, it is known that use of anti-hyperlipidemic medications by participants in such family studies distorts their blood lipid levels. Consequently, investigators may exclude subjects on medications during recruitment, or remove them at the time of the genetic analyses. Not only do such exclusions results in a smaller sample size, they also may discard the participants who are most likely to carry causative variants of dyslipidemia. To increase the power of the analysis by including these potentially informative subjects, some studies were designed to interrupt lipid lowering medication for specific time intervals before the blood samples were taken. Other methods that have been implemented are to adjust the lipid levels for medication by using medications as covariates in a linear regression model. This method tends to minimize the differences in lipid levels between medicated and unmedicated groups, but not necessarily adjust lipid levels toward their original values. To our knowledge, only one study has performed a genome-wide scan for LDL-C after increasing the measured levels by 25% for medicated subjects . The lod score for their highest peak increased from 3.27, observed when analyzing 1977 white subjects not on lipid lowering medications, to 3.72 after including 350 medicated subjects.
The aim of the present study is to recover or impute the original unmedicated lipid levels using an empirical approach. The measured (biased) lipid values of individuals on lipid-lowering drugs are "adjusted" by increasing (or decreasing) the measured value by the same amount that clinical trials studies report decreases (or increases) for a given class of drugs using ethnic-specific data. That is, the approach statistically infers or projects what the original lipid value would have been prior to medication treatment. The impact of the medication adjustments will be evaluated by computing heritabilities and by conducting genome-wide linkage analyses in three samples: by excluding medicated subjects; by including medicated subjects after adjusting lipid values for medication use; and by including medicated subjects without any medication adjustment. We hypothesize that imputing the original lipid measurement by adjusting for medication effects can provide more precise estimates of the medication-free values of the phenotypes, with an expected increase in power to detect genes involved in the lipid metabolism.
The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) study is part of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Family Blood Pressure Program. The design and methods have been described in detail elsewhere . In the present report 2,403 White and 2,214 African American participants represent 1,924 pairs of White hypertensive siblings in 1,242 nuclear families and 1,889 pairs of African American hypertensive siblings in 1,801 nuclear families. Among all participants with measured serum lipid levels, 402 subjects reported that they were taking medications to lower blood lipid levels. This included 385 subjects taking one medication, 16 subjects on combination drug therapy of two medications, and 1 subject reporting the use of three drugs. IRB approvals were obtained for all participating centers, and all participants gave their written informed consent.
Measurement of Lipids and Other Phenotypes
All blood assays on samples were performed at the Central Biochemistry Laboratory at the University of Minnesota. TG levels were colorimetrically determined by using a peroxidase-coupled method on a centrifugal analyzer . TC was measured by using a commercial cholesterol oxidase method . LDL-C was estimated by the Friedewald equation , or by ultracentrifugation for subjects with TG above 400 mg/dl . HDL-C was quantified by COBAS FARA (Roche Diagnostic Systems) after precipitation of the other lipoprotein fractions by dextran sulfate .
Anthropometric measurements were collected with subjects wearing lightweight suits. Body mass index (BMI) was subsequently calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Waist circumference was measured to the nearest centimeter at the level of the umbilicus, and hip circumference was measured at the level of the maximal circumference of the gluteus. All other measurements were collected using a common, standardized protocol administered by trained personnel.
The NHLBI Mammalian Genotyping Service (Marshfield, Wisconsin) genotyped 391 markers at approximate 10-cM intervals throughout the genome, with an average marker heterozygosity of 76%. Detailed information on the genotyping methods, instruments, and software used can be found at the Marshfield Laboratory World Wide Web site . Quality control of the markers and the relationships in the pedigrees were carried out at the HyperGEN Data Coordinating Center at Washington University in Saint Louis, by using ASPEX , GRR , MAPMAKER/SIBS , and PEDCHECK .
Adjustment for the effects of lipid-lowering medications
Mechanisms of action for the major groups of antihyperlipidemic medications and their frequency of use by the subjects in HyperGEN
Frequency of use
A partial removal of bile acids from the enterohepatic circulation by preventing their absorption
Fibric acid derivatives
Increasing fatty acid oxidation to decrease formation of VLDL (very low density lipoprotein) triglycerides
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors
Inhibiting HMG CoA reductase, the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis
Nicotinic acid derivatives
Inhibiting lipoprotein synthesis and decrease the production of VLDL particles
Average effects estimated from published clinical trails by ethnicity for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibric acid derivatives
Non-African Americans *
No. of pts pooled
Average effect (mg/dl) ± SE
No. of pts pooled
Average effect (mg/dl) ± SE
No. of pts pooled
Average effect (mg/dl) ± SE
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
-51.4 ± 11.2
-52.1 ± 13.2
-50.7 ± 13.9
-47.9 ± 7.2
-49.9 ± 13.6
-48.1 ± 13.9
+0.4 ± 1.7
+2.3 ± 0.5
+2.0 ± 0.8
-18.8 ± 4.2
-18.4 ± 3.7
-19.7 ± 4.5
Fibric acid derivatives (Gemfibrozil)
-46.1 ± 8.6
-20.1 ± 15.3
-40.1 ± 7.0
-11.4 ± 14.4
+5.9 ± 1.8
+3.1 ± 1.6
-57.1 ± 14.1
-59.0 ± 10.4
For the participants receiving mono-drug therapy of anti-hyperlipidemics, the levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG were adjusted with the effect estimates, where the sign (+/-) indicates the increasing or lowering effect of a medication to a specific lipid component. When an individual took a combination therapy of two drugs, the total effect was estimated by selecting the medication with higher effect on the lipids and conservatively adding up half effect of the other medication. Unadjusted measurements were used for 12 African Americans and 2 Whites who took Bile Sequestrants or Nicotinic Acid Derivatives. The third medication effect, which was presented for only one participant, was not considered in our study.
Statistical Methods and Linkage Analysis
TG with and without medication adjustments were transformed using natural logarithm to an approximate normal distribution. Each phenotype was then adjusted for its mean and variance to remove the effects of age as well as the effects of BMI, current smoking and drinking status, the use of estrogen replacement therapy, diabetes status, and the field center. Stepwise multiple regressions were performed for the adjustment within each ethnicity and sex group, retaining only the terms significant at the 5% level. The adjusted variables were finally standardized to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation (SD) of 1. Four to ten outliers greater than 4 SD-s from the mean and at least 1 SD from the nearest data point were excluded within each ethnic group for the lipid phenotypes.
where rparent-offspring, rsibling, and rspouse denote the average parent-offspring, the average sibling and the spouse correlations, respectively. Two heritability estimates were regarded as significantly different from each other if their difference was greater than the sum of their standard errors.
Genome-wide linkage analyses, both with and without adjustments for medication effects, were performed for each lipid phenotype by using variance component linkage analysis as implemented in SEGPATH . Linkage analysis was carried out separately within ethnicity by using ethnicity-specific marker allele frequencies derived from the corresponding random sub-samples. Multipoint IBD estimates were used in the linkage analysis.
Characteristics of subjects by ethnicity and sex in the HyperGEN study
Age, year (n)
52.9 ± 14.0 (1158)
53.7 ± 13.15 (1245)
45.25 ± 13.01 (814)
46.45 ± 13.32 (1400)
BMI, kg/m 2 (n)
29.0 ± 4.7 (1156)
29.0 ± 6.84 (1242)
29.54 ± 6.32 (813)
33.38 ± 8.14 (1399)
Waist/hip, ratio (n)
1.0 ± 0.1 (1104)
0.9 ± 0.09 (1158)
0.93 ± 0.07 (800)
0.88 ± 0.08 (1366)
Drinking status, % yes (n)
Smoking status, % yes (n)
Diabetes, % yes (n)
Estrogen, % yes (n)
Research center, % (n)
LDL-C, mg/dL (n)
118.26 ± 30.62 (1107)
117.26 ± 33.10(1217)
119.79 ± 37.63 (790)
117.95 ± 37.00 (1376)
LDL-C (adjusted), mg/dL (n)
125.03 ± 32.78 (1107)
122.19 ± 36.55 (1217)
121.74 ± 39.49 (790)
120.12 ± 38.52 (1376)
HDL-C, mg/dL (n)
43.05 ± 10.87 (1155)
55.04 ± 15.42 (1240)
49.15 ± 14.73 (805)
55.99 ± 15.17 (1382)
HDL-C (adjusted), mg/dL (n)
42.62 ± 10.92 (1155)
54.78 ± 15.54 (1240)
49.13 ± 14.75 (805)
55.98 ± 15.18 (1382)
TC, mg/dL (n)
193.22 ± 35.84 (1155)
201.23 ± 37.97 (1240)
192.23 ± 41.67 (807)
194.20 ± 40.86 (1382)
TC (adjusted), mg/dL (n)
200.40 ± 38.66 (1155)
206.52 ± 42.05 (1240)
194.32 ± 43.84 (807)
196.51 ± 42.64 (1382)
* TG, mg/dL (n)
4.94 ± 0.58 (1155)
4.85 ± 0.55 (1240)
4.59 ± 0.58 (807)
4.49 ± 0.51 (1382)
* TG (adjusted), mg/dL (n)
4.96 ± 0.58 (1155)
4.86 ± 0.56 (1240)
4.60 ± 0.58 (807)
4.50 ± 0.51 (1382)
The effect of medication correction on heritability of lipids: the HyperGEN study
Excluding medicated subjects
Including medicated subjects
Unadjusted with medications
Adjusted with medications
Genome scan results (lod score ≥ 1.75) for lipids with and without medication correction by ethnicity: the HyperGEN study
cM (from p-ter)
No. of sibs
No. of sibs
The purpose of this study was to propose and explore a method to adjust blood lipid measurements for the effects of anti-hyperlipidemic medications. To our knowledge, our empirical approach to adjust medication effects on lipids has not been applied before in the genetic epidemiology studies, although examples of other complex traits exist. Several approaches have been attempted to adjust blood pressure for the use of antihypertensive medications. We reported a similar empirical method to adjust blood pressure based on a summary of over 160 clinical trials on effects of anti-hypertensive medication . A nonparametric algorithm by ranking (the adjusted) blood pressure was implemented by Levy et al. in the Framingham Heart Study . Hunt et al. compared three methods, including the use of a threshold method assigning a fixed blood pressure (140/90 mm Hg) for all medicated participants, and a random assignment of systolic blood pressure between 140–160, and a random assignment of diastolic blood pressure between 90–100 mm Hg . The investigators concluded that excluding medicated measurements or the use of unadjusted blood pressure both lowered lod score results as compared to adjusting blood pressure measurements. Cui et al. examined the adjustment effects by adding an arbitrary 10 mm Hg and 5 mm Hg to systolic and diastolic blood pressures respectively, according to a publication on clinical trials [31, 32]. The adjusted blood pressure resulted in an increase of both genetic and shared environmental variance components, while the unadjusted blood pressure for antihypertensive treatments obscured the relationship among phenotypes and genotypes.
The heritabilities of lipids, estimated in our study by excluding all the participants who took lipid-lowering medications, should be less biased heritabilities. However, by excluding subjects there is a smaller sample size and some valuable genetic information may be lost, especially alleles of the subjects affected more by dyslipidemia. Including medicated participants would introduce bias, because of a confounding of the medication effects with the lipid levels. That is, the measured lipid levels are artificial. This could cause a reduction in the genetic variance component as was seen for TC and LDL-C when we used the whole sample without performing medication adjustments. Heritabilities for TC and LDL-C were significantly improved after medication adjustments to the similar level as those obtained when excluding the medicated subjects. This indicates that the adjustment with our empirical method recovered relationships among phenotypes and genotypes obscured by the use of medications. Therefore, our method can provide the benefit of a greater power in genetic analysis by increasing the sample size as well as the information content.
The lod score for the TC peak in African Americans, centered at 53.81 cM on chromosome 6, increased from 2.03 to 2.66 when the medication adjustments were applied. This linkage signal is about 25 cM from a suggestive signal which was reported in a bivariate analysis of TG and LDL-C (LOD = 2.0) from 1,747 African American siblings in the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study . Another study provided evidence of linkage (LOD = 2.14) at 102 cM on chromosome 6 for combined hyperlipidemia of TC and TG in 113 Caucasian families . In contrast, the peak with a lod score of 3.08 dropped slightly to 2.71 when including those measures with medication adjustments for TG in African Americans on chromosome 11 at 131 cM from p-ter. This peak replicates a suggestive signal (LOD = 1.93) detected in French Canadians , and 30 cM from the region (LOD = 3.34) that have previously been identified in Turkish families . We performed meta-analysis across African American and Caucasian families but there was no improvement in the LOD scores (results not shown).
Blood lipid levels are the result of a complex interaction among genetic and various environmental factors. The power of genome scans for detecting true signals is generally low with small-to-modest effect for complex traits like blood lipids. In addition, lipid-lowering treatment represents a pharmacologically induced alteration – typically of large magnitude – of the plasma lipid levels which further reduces the power to detect the true signals. One of the methods to overcome the confounding of medication effects with the measured lipid levels is to adjust the measured blood lipids by trying to recover the untreated levels as closely as possible. Although we noticed that the lod scores of blood lipids went both ways before and after medication adjustment in the present study, we expect lod scores for the medication adjusted analysis to be closest to their optimal (true) estimates. To evaluate our empirical approach of adjusting the treated lipid phenotypes, the heritability is a more appropriate parameter, since it reflects the effect size in linkage analysis. The higher heritabilities for TC and LDL-C when medication adjustments were made in the present study indicate an improvement in effect size of the linkage analysis with this empirical method. This is consistent with what is known about the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. First, as shown in Table 1 most of the medicated participants in the HyperGEN study took HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the effects is strongest on LDL-C and TC as shown in Table 3. Second, these inhibitors primarily target LDL-C (and by extension TC). For example, Table 2 shows larger mean and variance effects due to medication use for LDL-C and TC in the clinical trials literature.
Although our study has accounted for all participants and adjusted lipid measurements for aggregate medication effects, nevertheless there are limitations in the present study. The effects of anti-hyperlipidemics were estimated as group means rather than as individual responses to the medications, which are notoriously dose-dependent. Instead of producing precise untreated phenotype measurements, an adjustment with the average effects of medications may further serve as a shift by a constant and obscure the association between the phenotype and genotype. Also, we focused only on two groups of lipid-lowering medications, i.e., the most commonly used by subjects in the HyperGEN study. Under different circumstances an overall weighted average effect of other groups of anti-hyperlipidemic medications could be used. Another issue is that the present study did not ascertain the effect of the different patient groups which may influence antihyperlipidemic responses. Although dose-specific effects should be estimated when the information is available, the doses used in each of the source clinical trials were pooled to estimate the general efficacy for each group of medications because we do not have all the desired data in the HyperGEN study, such as dosage of anti-hyperlipidemics used by subjects. Similarly, we had to assume that the medicated subjects in the HyperGEN study had been prescribed, and were adhering, to the most commonly recommended doses. However, various strategies have been implemented to improve the compliance significantly during the clinical trials. The efficacy estimated from clinical trials is likely to overestimate the results observed in a general population of hyperlipidemic individuals under the treatment, such as in the HyperGEN study. Therefore, applying those estimates of drug effects would tend to over adjust the lipid values for studies using general populations.
In conclusion, this study provides a summary of a large number of clinical trials on the average effects of anti-hyperlipidemic medications on the actual lipid phenotypes, and an empirical method to adjust measured lipids for such medication effects. An illustrative example of how to apply this methodology is presented for the HyperGEN data. The medication adjustments using this method resulted in an improvement in the heritability estimates for TC, LDL-C, and TG. Genome scans with the imputed lipid measurements revealed some promising regions, such as a QTL with a peak lod score 2.66 at 53.81 cM from p-ter on chromosome 6 for TC and a region with lod score of 2.71 centered at 131 cM on chromosome 11 for TG in African Americans. The method described and the medication-use adjustments derived from a large body of clinical trials can be employed in other epidemiologic and genetic studies to obtain more accurate estimates of the lipid measurements as well to preserve the power of the study.
We are thankful to the study participants and the Primary Centers and Investigators of HyperGEN:
University of Utah (Network Coordinating Center, Field Center, and Molecular Genetics Lab): Steven C. Hunt, Ph.D. (Network Director and Field Center P.I.); Mark F. Leppert, Ph.D. (Molecular Genetics P.I.); Jean-Marc Lalouel, M.D., D.Sc; Robert B. Weiss, Ph.D.; Roger R. Williams, M.D. (late); Janet Hood.
Boston University (Field Center): Richard H. Myers, Ph.D. (P.I.); R. Curtis Ellison, M.D.; Yuqing Zhang, M.D.; Jemma B. Wilk, D.Sc.; Luc Djoussé, M.D., D.Sc.; Greta Lee Splansky, M.S.
University of Alabama (Field Center): Cora E. Lewis, M.D., M.S.P.H. (P.I.); Albert Oberman, M.D., M.P.H.; Donna K. Arnett, Ph.D.; Phillip Johnson; Christie Oden.
University of Minnesota (Field Center and Biochemistry Lab): James S. Pankow, Ph.D. (Field Center P.I.); Michael B. Miller, Ph.D.; Michael Li, Ph.D.; John H. Eckfeldt, M.D., Ph.D.; Anthony A. Killeen, M.D., Ph.D.; Catherine Leiendecker-Foster, M.S.; Jean Bucksa; Greg Rynders.
University of North Carolina (Field Center): Kari E. North, Ph.D. (P.I); Barry I. Freedman, M.D.; Gerardo Heiss, M.D., Ph.D.
Washington University (Data Coordinating Center): D.C. Rao, Ph.D. (P.I.); Michael A. Province, Ph.D.; Aldi T. Kraja, Ph.D.; Ingrid B. Borecki, Ph.D.; Charles Gu, Ph.D.; Treva Rice, Ph.D; Ping An, M.D; Jun Wu, M.D.; Karen L. Schwander, M.S.; Derek Morgan; Stephen Mandel; Shiping Wang M.S.; Matthew Brown.
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: Susan E. Old, Ph.D.; Cashell Jaquish, Ph.D.; Dina Paltoo, Ph.D.
This hypertension network is funded by cooperative agreements (U10) with NHLBI: HL54471, HL54472, HL54473, HL54495, HL54496, HL54497, HL54509, HL54515.
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: National Institure of Health. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). NIH Publication No. 02-5215, September 2002.Google Scholar
- Rao DC, Laskarzewski PM, Morrison JA, Khoury P, Kelly K, Wette R, Russell J, Glueck CJ: The Cincinnati Lipid Research Clinic family study: cultural and biological determinants of lipids and lipoprotein concentrations. Am J Hum Genet. 1982, 34 (6): 888-903.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunt SC, Hasstedt SJ, Kuida H, Stults BM, Hopkins PN, Williams RR: Genetic heritability and common environmental components of resting and stressed blood pressures, lipids, and body mass index in Utah pedigrees and twins. Am J Epidemiol. 1989, 129: 625-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perusse L, Rice T, Despres JP, Bergeron J, Province MA, Gagnon J, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, et al: Familial resemblance of plasma lipids, lipoproteins and postheparin lipoprotein and hepatic lipases in the HERITAGE Family Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17: 3263-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naoumova RP, Bonney SA, Eichenbaum-Voline S, Patel HN, Jones B, Jones EL, Amey J, Colilla S, Neuwirth CK, Allotey R, Seed M, Betteridge DJ, Galton DJ, Cox NJ, Bell GI, Scott J, Shoulders CC: Confirmed locus on chromosome 11p and candidate loci on 6q and 8p for the triglyceride and cholesterol traits of combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23: 2070-7. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000095975.35247.9F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bosse Y, Chagnon YC, Despres JP, Rice T, Rao DC, Bouchard C, Perusse L, Vohl MC: Genome-wide linkage scan reveals multiple susceptibility loci influencing lipid and lipoprotein levels in the Quebec Family Study. J Lipid Res. 2004, 45: 419-26. 10.1194/jlr.M300401-JLR200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newman DL, Abney M, Dytch H, Parry R, McPeek MS, Ober C: Major loci influencing serum triglyceride levels on 2q14 and 9p21 localized by homozygosity-by-descent mapping in a large Hutterite pedigree. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12 (2): 137-44. 10.1093/hmg/ddg012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coon H, Leppert MF, Eckfeldt JH, Oberman , Myers RH, Peacock JM, Province MA, Hopkins PN, Heiss G: Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis of Lipids in the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Blood Pressure Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21: 1969-1976. 10.1161/hq1201.100228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollin TI, Hsueh WC, Steinle NI, Snitker S, Shuldiner AR, Mitchell BD: A genome-wide scan of serum lipid levels in the Old Order Amish. Atherosclerosis. 2004, 173: 89-96. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.11.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soro A, Pajukanta P, Lilja HE, Ylitalo K, Hiekkalinna T, Perola M, Cantor RM, Viikari JS, Taskinen MR, Peltonen L: Genome scans provide evidence for low-HDL-C loci on chromosomes 8q23, 16q24.1-24.2, and 20q13.11 in Finnish families. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70: 1333-1340. 10.1086/339988.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Almasy L, Hixson JE, Rainwater DL, Cole S, Williams JT, Mahaney MC, VandeBerg JL, Stern MP, MacCluer JW, Blangero J: Human pedigree-based quantitative-trait-locus mapping: localization of two genes influencing HDL-cholesterol metabolism. Am J Hum Genet. 1999, 64: 1686-1693. 10.1086/302425.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rainwater DL, Almasy L, Blangero J, Cole SA, VandeBerg JL, MacCluer JW, Hixson JE: A genome search identifies major quantitative trait loci on human chromosomes 3 and 4 that influence cholesterol concentrations in small LDL particles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999, 19: 777-783.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coon H, Eckfeldt JH, Leppert MF, Myers RH, Arnett DK, Heiss G, Province MA, Hunt SC: A genome-wide screen reveals evidence for a locus on chromosome 11 influencing variation in LDL cholesterol in the NHLBI Family Heart Study. Hum Genet. 2002, 111: 263-269. 10.1007/s00439-002-0773-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams RR, Rao DC, Ellison RC, Arnett DK, Heiss G, Oberman A, Eckfeldt JH, Leppert MF, Province MA, Mockrin SC, Hunt SC: NHLBI family blood pressure program: methodology and recruitment in the HyperGEN network. Hypertension genetic epidemiology network. Ann Epidemiol. 2000, 10: 389-400. 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00063-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGowan MW, Artiss JD, Strandbergh DR, Zork B: A peroxidase-coupled method for the colorimetric determination of serum triglycerides. Clin Chem. 1983, 29: 538-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan C, Richmond W, Fu PC: Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974, 20: 470-475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- David JA, Naito NK: Separation of lipoprotein (Lp) fraction by the Beckman TL-100 table-top ultracentrifuge (UC). Clin Chem. 1986, 32: 1094-Google Scholar
- Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ: Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1982, 28: 1379-1388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hinds D, Risch N: The ASPEX package: affected sib-pair exclusion mapping v1.88. 1999, [ftp://lahmed.stanford.edu/pub/aspex/doc/usage.html]Google Scholar
- Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR: GRR: graphical representation of relationship errors. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 742-743. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kruglyak L, Lander ES: Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1995, 57: 439-454.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Connell JR, Weeks DE: PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 259-266. 10.1086/301904.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Province MA, Rao DC: General purpose model and a computer program for combined segregation and path analysis (SEGPATH): automatically creating computer programs for symbolic language model specifications. Genet Epidemiol. 1995, 12: 203-219. 10.1002/gepi.1370120208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Province MA, Rice TK, Borecki IB, Gu C, Kraja A, Rao DC: Multivariate and multilocus variance components method, based on structural relationships to assess quantitative trait linkage via SEGPATH. Genet Epidemiol. 2003, 24: 128-138. 10.1002/gepi.10208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rao DC, Province MA: The future of path analysis, segregation analysis, and combined models for genetic dissection of complex traits. Hum Hered. 2000, 50: 34-42. 10.1159/000022889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Kraja AT, Oberman A, Lewis CE, Ellison RC, Arnett DK, Heiss G, Lalouel JM, Turner ST, Hunt SC, Province MA, Rao DC: A summary of antihypertensive medication effects on measured blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2005, 18: 934-941. 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.01.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levy D, DeStefano AL, Larson MG, O'Donnell CJ, Lifton RP, Gavras H, Cupples LA, Myers RH: Evidence for a gene influencing blood pressure on chromosome 17. Genome scan linkage results for longitudinal blood pressure phenotypes in subjects from the framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2000, 36: 477-483.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunt SC, Ellison RC, Atwood LD, Pankow JS, Province MA, Leppert MF: Genome scans for blood pressure and hypertension: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Hypertension. 2002, 40: 1-6. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000022660.28915.B1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui JS, Hopper JL, Harrap SB: Antihypertensive treatments obscure familial contributions to blood pressure variation. Hypertension. 2003, 41: 207-210. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000044938.94050.E3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neaton JD, Grimm RH, Prineas RJ, Stamler J, Grandits GA, Elmer PJ, Cutler JA, Flack JM, Schoenberger JA, McDonald R, Lewis CE, Liebson PR: Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group. JAMA. 1993, 270: 713-724. 10.1001/jama.270.6.713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- North KE, Miller MB, Coon H, Martin LJ, Peacock JM, Arnett D, Zhang B, Province M, Oberman A, Blangero J, Almasy L, Ellison RC, Heiss G: Evidence for a gene influencing fasting LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels on chromosome 21q. Atherosclerosis. 2005, 179: 119-25. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.09.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu Y, Wyszynski DF, Waterworth DM, Wilton SD, Barter PJ, Kesaniemi YA, Mahley RW, McPherson R, Waeber G, Bersot TP, Ma Q, Sharma SS, Montgomery DS, Middleton LT, Sundseth SS, Mooser V, Grundy SM, Farrer LA: Multiple QTLs influencing triglyceride and HDL and total cholesterol levels identified in families with atherogenic dyslipidemia. J Lipid Res. 2005, 46: 2202-13. 10.1194/jlr.M500137-JLR200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.