Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Results of sire-based QTL mapping analysis and proportion of phenotypic variance explained by each chromosome

From: The genetic architecture of growth and fillet traits in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

  Harvest Weight Fillet Weight Gutted Weight Deheaded Weight Fillet Yield
     covariate$   covariate$    covariate$    covariate$
Chr F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE
1 - - 1.88* 0.047 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - 1.96* 0 - - - - - - 1.90* n.a.† 1.89* n.a.†
7 - - - - - - 2.03* 0.057 - - 2.07* 0.06 1.79* 0.037 - - - -
9 - - 2.04* 0.055 - - 2.12* 0.056 - - 2.26* 0.062 - - - - - -
10 - - 2.08* 0.053 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11 2.10* 0.065 2.27* 0.077 2.26** 0.071 1.96* 0.055 - - 1.91* 0.052 - - 2.32* n.a.† 2.31** n.a.†
12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.05* 0.078 - - - -
13 2.49** 0.074 2.53** 0.075 1.90* 0.07 2.78** 0.083 - - 2.67** 0.08 1.81* 0.034 2.37* n.a.† 2.37** n.a.†
15 2.12* 0.076 - - - - 2.24* 0.077 - - 2.43* 0.091 - - - - - -
16 2.23* 0.06 - - - - 2.06* 0.048 - - 2.19* 0.055 - - - - - -
17 2.22* 0.082 2.47* 0.096 - - 2.10* 0.069 - - 2.37* 0.085 - - - - - -
18 2.59** 0.083 2.76** 0.092 - - 2.89** 0.092 - - 2.82** 0.089 - - - - - -
19 2.00* 0.05 2.62** 0.078 - - 2.00* 0.046 - - 2.00* 0.049 - - - - - -
20 2.66** 0.09 2.42* 0.077 - - 2.76** 0.087 - - 2.76** 0.09 - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - 1.72* 0.034 1.89* 0.114 - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.95* 0.063 - - - -
23 - - - - 1.86* 0.033 - - - - - - - - - - - -
24 2.52* 0.068 2.58* 0.07 - - 2.66* 0.07 2.45* n.a.† 2.84* 0.079 2.56* 0.066 - - - -
27 1.77* 0.039 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
28 1.88* 0.043 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
29 - - 1.97* 0.06 - - 2.31* 0.078 - - 2.32* 0.079 - - - - - -
  Head Weight Gut Weight Body Waste Weight SalmoFan Scale Total Waste Weight
    covariate$    covariate$        covariate$
Chr F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE F ratio PVE
1 1.76* 0.07 - - - - - - - - - - 1.80* 0.068 - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - 2.30* 0.088 - - 3.20** 0.154
6 2.12* 0.074 - - - - - - - - - - 2.05* 0.078 - -
7 - - - - 1.73* 0.044 1.72* 0.048 2.01* 0.063 - - 2.49* 0.075 - -
9 2.05* 0.07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11 1.96* n.a.† - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.00* 0.099
13 2.72** 0.072 - - - - - - - - - - 2.44* 0.046 1.91* 0.052
16 - - - - 1.98* 0.044 - - - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - 2.16* 0.093 - - - - 2.11* 0.085 - - - -
18 2.11* 0.069 - - - - - - - - - - 1.88* 0.047 - -
19 2.49** 0.068 - - - - - - - - - - 2.22* 0.033 - -
20 2.02* 0.067 - - 2.19** 0.063 - - - - - - 1.99* 0.048 - -
21 - - 1.72* n.a.† - - - - 1.85* 0.03 - - 1.76* 0.046 - -
22 - - 1.90* 0.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
24 2.24* 0.068 - - 3.03** 0.094 3.13** 0.126 - - - - - - - -
25 - - 1.97* 0.4 - - - - - - 2.04* 0.067 - - - -
  1. *: chromosome-wide significance at p < 0.05; **: genome-wide significance at p < 0.05; PVE: proportion of phenotypic variance for half-sib analysis
  2. : Due to the MSEfull value being equal to MSEreduced
  3. $: Harvest weight was fitted as covariate