Open Access

YY super sperm lead to all male triploids and tetraploids

  • Rong Zhou1,
  • Jun Xiao1,
  • Qinbo Qin1,
  • Bin Zhu1,
  • Rurong Zhao1,
  • Chun Zhang1,
  • Min Tao1,
  • Kaikun Luo1,
  • Jing Wang1,
  • Liangyue Peng1 and
  • Shaojun Liu1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Genetics201516:68

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0230-z

Received: 10 April 2015

Accepted: 10 June 2015

Published: 25 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Androgenesis is a unique and rarely encountered reproductive mode in which the offspring only inherit the paternal nuclear genome, resulting in relatively few viable individuals.

Results

In this study, a super male (YY) crucian carp was obtained by androgenesis with the diploid sperm of autotetraploid crucian carp (4n = 200). Flow cytometry assay confirmed the fish was diploid. The scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry analysis results of sperm revealed that the YY crucian carp produced unreduced diploid sperm. To prove the special reproductive characteristic and homozygosity of the YY crucian carp, three rounds of hybridization experiments were performed. First, self-crossing between female androgenic progenies and YY crucian carp generated all male tetraploids. Then, hybridization of female red crucian carp (2n = 100) and female autotetraploid fish (4n = 200) with YY crucian carp produced all male triploids and all male tetraploids, respectively.

Conclusions

This is the first time reported producing a viable diploid homozygous YY fish with unreduced diploid sperm of the autotetraploid fish, which were derived from distant hybridization. These results will not only help explaining the sex determination mechanism in teleost fish, but also play a significant role in genetic breeding in aquaculture.

Keywords

Androgenesis Super male crucian carp Unreduced gametes All male triploids All male tetraploids Carp

Background

Androgenesis is a uniparental developmental mode, in which the offspring only inherit the paternal nuclear genome making them clones of the father [1]. This mode of reproduction has been successfully carried out in several fish species that adopt external fertilization, such as Cyprinus carpio [2], Oncorhynchus mykiss [3, 4], Oreochromis niloticus [5], and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus [6]. Androgenesis is one of the best chromosome manipulation techniques available and is useful in constructing pure genetic lines, generating monosexual fish [5, 7], restoring endangered or extinct species from cryopreserved spermatozoa [8], and evaluating how the mitochondrial genome affects development [9].

In general, embryonic development in teleost fish is activated by fertilization. In androgenesis, an egg whose nuclear content is destroyed serves as the vector; it is then fertilized with an untreated native sperm to form a haploid embryo. The egg provides the functional cytoplasm, but does not contribute to the nuclear genome of the offspring during development. Subsequently, to obtain diploid embryos, the first cell division is inhibited by either heat or pressure shock. After the first cell division blockage, the genome is duplicated to form a diploid. There are two physical treatments in the entire process. This first is inactivating eggs by ultraviolet irradiation or gamma ray, the second is preventing first mitosis by heat or pressure shock. Researchers have compared the effects of both treatments on embryo survival rates. Thorgaard et al. found that the survival rate of androgenic progenies with diploid sperm is much higher than those with haploid sperm, which indicates that pressure shock treatment and/or homozygosity may be responsible for the low survival rate of androgenic double haploids; while the ultraviolet irradiation inactivation method did not pose much of a problem [10]. Yamaha et al. found that both heat and pressure shock induced developmental disorders during embryonic development, in particular they suppressed dorso-ventral differentiation [11]. To date, few examples of successful androgenesis with diploid sperm have been reported for limited kinds of fertile tetraploid fishes [1, 6].

Researchers have reported the first allotetraploid hybrids (4n = 200, abbreviated as 4nAT) derived from crossing between red crucian carp (Carassius auratus red var.) (2n = 100, abbreviated as RCC) (♀) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) (2n = 100, abbreviated as CC) (♂). Since then, a consecutive allotetraploid line has been established from generations F3 to F24 [12, 13]. Recently, autotetraploid crucian carp (4n = 200) have been obtained by distant hybridization between RCC (2n = 100) (♀) and blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) (2n = 48, abbreviated as BSB) (♂); the autotetraploid crucian carp line was formed from generations F2 to F8 [14]. Both tetraploid lines are useful for genetic research and breeding, especially androgenesis, because tetraploids can produce many diploid spermatozoa. Sun et al. induced androgenesis in diploid 4nAT sperm and successfully yielded bisexual fertile diploid AT-ag [15]. Unfortunately, all of the male AT-ag fish obtained by Sun et al. were heterozygous for both the sex ratios of male to female fish in F1 ag × ag and AT × AT-ag did not differ significantly from the expected ratio of 1:1 [15].

In this study, we used the diploid spermatozoa of autotetraploid crucian carp to artificially induce androgenesis to screen homozygous super male fish. In the androgenetic offspring, a male fish with white sperm was selected. The following characteristic analysis revealed that the YY crucian carp was diploid and produced unreduced diploid sperm. Furthermore, self-crossing and hybridization of the YY crucian carp with diploid female RCC and 4nAT sired all male triploids and tetraploids, respectively, which proves that the male fish selected was a homozygous super-male YY crucian carp. This is the first report in which a viable homozygous super-male fish with diploid sperm was obtained by distant hybridization and androgenesis. This fish will benefit the study of the sex determination mechanism in teleost fish, and producing all male fish making it important for genetic breeding in aquaculture.

Results

The formation of diploid androgenetic fish

A both female and male fertile autotetraploid crucian carp line, obtained via the intergeneric hybridization of RCC (2n = 100, ♀) × BSB (2n = 48, ♂) and self-crossing of F1, has been established from F2 to F8 [14]. Diploid spermatozoa with a large diameter of approximately 2.4 μm were generated by the male autotetraploid crucian carp [14]. In the present study, artificial androgenesis was performed using ultraviolet irradiation inactivated RCC eggs as the recipient and untreated diploid spermatozoa from the autotetraploid crucian carp as the donor. Diploid embryos were formed directly after fertilization and subsequently developed into androgenetic fish. During androgenesis in this study, the fertilization rate is about 10.01 %, the hatching rate about 2.10 %, and the survival rate about 1.66 % (Table 1). The survival rate has improved obviously by using the diploid sperm when compared to previous studies using haploid sperm in O. mykiss (0.8 %) [10]. This androgenetic fish population was named as A0 (Fig. 1), both the male and female fish were fertile. A self-cross between male and female A0 individuals obtained A1 individuals (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Statistic analysis of androgenesis with diploid sperm

Eggs

2047

Fertilization embryos

205

Fertilization rate

10.01 %

Hatching fry

43

Hatching rate

2.10 %

Adult fish

34

Survival rate

1.66 %

Fertilization rate = (number of fertilization embryos/number of eggs) × 100 %

Hatching rate = (number of hatching fry/number of eggs) × 100 %

Survival rate = (number of adult fish / number of eggs) × 100 %

Fig. 1

The origin and formation of androgenetic fish. The RCC and BSB chromosomes are red and blue, respectively. The probable sex and sex chromosome compositions of the A0 individuals are listed in the box

Morphological and genetic characteristics of super-male (YY) crucian carp

Theoretically, the androgenetic progenies contained three genotypes (XX, XY and YY). Actually, all the androgenetic progenies displayed the similar phenotype. We cannot distinguish the three fishes via comparing phenotypes. In the A0 population, a special male fish with white semen was distinguished from other male fish with water-like semen. We therefore presumed that this was a homozygous super-male fish and named it YY crucian carp. The body of the YY crucian carp was gray in color, which was consistent with its male parent the male autotetraploid crucian carp [14] (Fig. 2a). Regarding the measurable traits, the YY crucian carp exhibited higher body length to width, head length to width, and tail length to width ratios; whereas it had a lower body width to head width ratio than RCC and the F8 autotetraploid crucian carp (Table 2). As for the countable traits, the YY crucian carp possessed more lateral and upper lateral scales, and less abdominal fins than the RCC and F8 autotetraploid crucian carp, while there was no obvious difference in the other traits (Table 3). To study the genetic characteristics of the YY crucian carp, flow cytometry analysis was used to measure the DNA content of the YY crucian carp. The YY crucian carp had a DNA content mean of 100, which was identical to that of the RCC control (Fig. 2b). Therefore, both the larger sperm size of the autotetraploid crucian carp and ploidy observations via chromosome spread and flow cytometry analysis indicated that the YY crucian carp was diploid.
Fig. 2

Morphology and ploidy analysis of the YY fish. a The appearance of the YY fish. b DNA content means of RCC and YY fish were measured by flow cytometry analysis. RCC was used as the control

Table 2

Comparison of RCC, F8, and YY fish measurable traits

Fish type

Whole length/body length

Body length/body width

Body length/head length

Head length/head width

Tail length/tail width

Body width/head width

RCC

1.22 ± 0.02

2.18 ± 0.02

3.72 ± 0.03

1.07 ± 0.03

0.82 ± 0.03

1.84 ± 0.03

F8

1.23 ± 0.02

2.23 ± 0.08

3.73 ± 0.02

1.08 ± 0.02

0.84 ± 0.02

1.88 ± 0.06

YY fish

1.21 ± 0.02

2.82 ± 0.04

3.87 ± 0.02

1.25 ± 0.02

0.87 ± 0.02

1.72 ± 0.03

Table 3

Comparison of RCC, F8, and YY fish countable traits

Fish type

No. of lateral scales

No. of upper lateral scales

No. of lower lateral scales

No. of dorsal fins

No. of abdominal fins

No. of anal fins

RCC

29.20 ± 0.70 (28–30)

5.60 ± 0.50 (5–6)

5.70 ± 0.47 (5–6)

III + 18.65 ± 0.49 (III + 18-19)

8.55 ± 0.51 (8–9)

III + 5.65 ± 0.49 (III + 5-6)

F8

29.54 ± 1.03 (29–32)

5.36 ± 0.50 (5–6)

6.81 ± 0.75 (5–7)

III + 18.27 ± 0.46 (III + 18-19)

8.63 ± 0.50 (8–9)

III + 5.45 ± 0.52 (III + 5-6)

YY fish

33.54 ± 0.90 (33–34)

5.72 ± 0.35 (5–6)

5.81 ± 0.82 (5–7)

III + 18.43 ± 0.51 (III + 18-19)

8.21 ± 0.42 (8–9)

III + 5.34 ± 0.46 (III + 5-6)

The reproductive features of the super-male (YY) crucian carp

The 2-year-old YY crucian carp produced white semen, while the 1-year-old fish did not. This indicated that the YY crucian carp reaches sexual maturity at 2 years of age. The microstructure of the mature YY crucian carp sperm was observed via the scanning electron microscope. RCC spermatozoa were haploid with a diameter range of 1.88–1.99 μm as standard (Fig. 3a and b). In contrast, the YY crucian carp spermatozoa ranged from 2.33 to 2.42 μm in diameter (Fig. 3c and d), which is larger than the haploid control spermatozoa but similar to the autotetraploid crucian carp diploid spermatozoa (~2.40 μm diameter) [14]. The DNA content measurement of sperms by flow cytometry analysis revealed that the DNA content of sperm from the YY crucian carp is the double of sperm from RCC (Fig. 4a and b). The above results both proved that the diploid YY crucian carp produced unreduced diploid sperm.
Fig. 3

YY fish spermatozoa morphology. a and b RCC spermatozoa at different magnification scales. c and d YY fish spermatozoa at different magnification scales. The magnification and scale bar are labeled in the pictures. Sperm diameter is also indicated

Fig. 4

DNA content analysis of YY fish spermatozoa. DNA content analysis of sperm from the RCC (a)and YY fish (b) was performed by flow cytometry. Sperm of RCC was used as the control

Self-cross between female A0 individuals and the YY crucian carp sired all-male tetraploid progenies

To estimate the fertility, homozygosity, and gamete ploidy of the putative YY crucian carp, a self-cross between the female diploid androgenetic fish (A0) and the YY crucian carp was performed. The cross and presumed sexual chromosome composition are shown in Fig. 5a. All of the offspring were male. Moreover, both the male and female A0 individuals produced diploid gametes, thus, siring tetraploid offspring (Fig. 5a). Chromosome observations of metaphase spreads confirmed that the chromosome number of self-cross offspring (A1) was 200 (Fig. 5b). DNA content measurement by flow cytometry analysis revealed that the DNA content of A1 fish was double that of RCC (Fig. 5c).
Fig. 5

Self-cross between female androgenetic fish and the YY fish. a Self-cross between female diploid androgenetic fish (A0) and male YY fish. b Chromosome observations of A1 individual. c Ploidy analysis of A1 fish by flow cytometry. RCC was used as the standard. The X and Y chromosomes are blue and red, respectively

Hybridization between different ploidy female fish and super-male (YY) crucian carp

To further confirm the ploidy of YY super sperm and the homozygosity of the YY crucian carp, hybridizations between different ploidy female fish and YY crucian carp were performed. The hybridization plans were shown in Fig. 6a. The composition of proposed sexual chromosomes in each fish was described (Fig. 6a). Both hybridization groups sired all-male offspring. As stated before, RCC produced haploid ova, while the autotetraploid crucian carp generated diploid ova. Therefore, hybridizations between RCC or autotetraploid crucian carp and the YY crucian carp obtained triploid and tetraploid progenies, respectively. Chromosome observations revealed that the chromosome number of the triploid offspring was 150, and that of the tetraploids was 200 (Fig. 6b). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the DNA content of triploid offspring was one half that of RCC and that of tetraploids was two-fold (Fig. 6c). All of the results prove that the YY crucian carp was homozygous and produces unreduced diploid sperm.
Fig. 6

Hybridization between female RCC (diploid), 4nAT (tetraploid), and YY fish. a The summarized hybridization schedule. b Chromosome observations of the all-male triploids and tetraploids. c DNA content measurement of the all-male triploids and tetraploids. RCC was used as the control

Discussion

Androgenesis is an induced developmental process whereby only the paternal nuclear genome is inherited, it involves an inactivated egg and an active sperm for fertilization [16]. To evaluate the inactivation of eggs and verify the androgenetic nature of the offspring, several methods have been developed to distinguish double haploid individuals and hybrid fish of the same ploidy. For example, random amplification polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis has been used in Hemigrammus caudovittatus [17], recessive color markers in Oreochromis niloticus [18], and allozyme genotypes in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus [6]. In this study, androgenesis involved the sperm of autotetraploid crucian carp and the ova of RCC. As previously described, the autotetraploid crucian carp produced diploid gametes, while the RCC produced haploid ova. The interploid crossing generated triploids [14]. Therefore, the chromosome number and DNA content irrefutably distinguish A0 individuals from female RCC and F8 male autotetraploid hybrids. The chromosome counting and ploidy analysis results revealed that the YY crucian carp was diploid not triploid, which verified the androgenetic nature of the YY crucian carp.

Qin et al. have reported that autotetraploid crucian carp were obtained by distant hybridization, and contained four sets of RCC chromosomes [14]. Thus, the diploid sperm produced by the autotetraploid crucian carp should contain two sets of RCC chromosomes. However, they also pointed out that some measurable and countable phenotypic changes occurred in autotetraploid crucian carp compared with RCC, e.g., the gray body color and barbells [14]. Although the autotetraploid crucian carp differs from the interspecific allotetraploid hybrid fish, genome variation still occurred during whole genome duplication. Based on the genetic background of the autotetraploid crucian carp, the diploid sperm proved to be a hybrid gamete. Moreover, the gray body color of YY crucian carp is consistent with the autotetraploid crucian carp and differs from RCC.

Generally speaking, the fertile diploid fish produces haploid gametes through normal meiosis. However, the diploid hybrid fish, which contains two different sets of chromosomes, would meet disordered synapsis of homologous chromosomes via normal meiosis. This difficulties could be rescued by mechanisms as follows: (i) pre-meiotic doubling of DNA during spermatogenesis [19]; (ii) fusion of sperm after meiosis [20]; and (iii) abortive cytokinesis during meiosis [21]. Therefore, the diploid hybrid fish derived from distant hybridization usually produces unreduced diploid gametes. This phenomenon has been observed in studies of Cherfas et al. and Liu et al. [2224]. Interestingly, in this study, DNA content analysis on adult fish and sperm size and DNA content measurements also revealed that the androgenetic YY crucian carp was diploid and produced unreduced diploid gametes. While the extract genetic mechanism related to the unreduced diploid gametes is still unknown. For the survival advantages of androgenesis using diploid gametes, the unreduced gametes from the hybrid fish would be benefit to establish a pure clonal line. For example, the gynogenetic offspring of 4nAT can produce unreduced diploid ova, and forms a diploid gynogenetic clonal line from G0 to G10 till now [24].

In mammals, sex determination is generally due to male heterogamety (XY system). The master sex determining gene SRY, which is located on the Y chromosome, is identified [25, 26]. In fish species, for its special position in evolution, the sex determination system is complex and diverse [27]. Both male (males are XY or YY and females are XX) and female heterogamety (females are ZW and males are ZZ) occur. More complicated systems can involve multiple sex chromosomes and multiple gene loci on autosomes, and also environmental factors (for example temperature) [16]. Until now, morphologically distinct sex chromosomes and key sex determining genes have not been identified. Unisexual reproduction pathways, such as gynogenesis and androgenesis, are excellent genetic tools to explore the sex determination mechanism [28]. In common carp, sex determination is thought to be an XX/XY system [2]. In RCC and common carp hybrids, gynogenesis with diploid 4nAT ova sired all female progenies [24]. While androgenesis with diploid 4nAT sperm sired both male and female offspring [15], proving the presence of an XX/XY sex determination system. Here, androgenesis with diploid sperm from autotetraploid crucian carp produced male and female individuals, providing additional evidence on the sex determination system in crucian carp.

In allopolyploids, abnormal paring and segregation of chromosomes during meiosis, which leads to the production of gametes with complete paternal or maternal chromosomes, has been observed [29]. The androgenetic male fish produce unreduced diploid gametes with two rounds of genome duplication. Thus, in the gamete generation process, XY male fish can produce sperm with three different genotypes (XX, XY, and YY). After crossing with female fish, the offspring should segregate as XXXX female and XXXY/XXYY male progenies. In contrast, YY male fish only produce YY genotypical sperm. All male offspring were expected from the crosses. In practice, the putative YY crucian carp mating with either diploid or tetraploid female fish yielded all male triploids and tetraploids, respectively. This result is consistent with the latter assumption. Thus, the homozygous YY nature of the putative super male fish was confirmed by crossing them with female fish of different ploidy and genetic background. We observed that the super male YY crucian carp produced white semen, while other male fish just produced water-like semen. Kirankumar et al. found that the YY male fish displayed higher sexual gland index (GSI) and sperm counts than XY tiger barb male fish [30]. The male androgenetic fish with water-like semen have also been used for hybridization with diploid female red crucian carp to evaluate the genotype by progeny testing. The offspring sex of male A0 with water-like semen includes male and female (data not shown). This result is consistent with the observation of previous studies [30].

Conclusions

This is the first report in which homozygous super male YY crucian carp are obtained via distant hybridization and androgenesis. Regarding the unreduced sperm, the YY crucian carp could maintain the fish clonal line via androgenesis without any treatments for chromosome duplication. In theory, the homozygous YY crucian carp provides a perfect material for exploring the major sex determination-related genes to artificially switch sex differentiation. It also provides a platform to explore the mechanism behind unreduced sperm production. In aquaculture breeding, the YY crucian carp is available for the production of all male tetraploids, which not only benefits the study of the ploidy mechanism in fish, but also provides male parents for producing large numbers of all male sterile triploids.

Methods

Ethics

All samples were cultured in ponds and fed with artificial feed at the Protection Station of Polyploidy Fish, Hunan Normal University. Fish treatments were carried out according to the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, approved by the Science and Technology Bureau of China. For the fish in question are not rare or near extinction (first-class or second-class state protection level), approval from the Department of Wildlife Administration is not required for the experiments conducted in this paper.

Experimental fish and crossing

Androgenesis was performed according to previously described methods, with some modification [15, 31]. During the reproductive season (from April to June), one mature male autotetraploid F8 fish were selected to produce diploid sperm. Semen was collected and diluted with Hank’s buffer (1:4, v/v). About 2047 eggs from one RCC were spread in a monolayer on three independent glass petri dishes containing synthetic ovarian fluid, and then irradiated by 300 mJ/cm2 ultraviolet rays for 180 s with constant stirring to ensure a homogenous inactivation of all eggs. After irradiation, the eggs were inseminated with untreated milt and hatched at 25 °C to form the androgenetic individuals. The fertilization rate, hatching rate and survival rate have been calculated.

For the self-crosses and interploid hybridization, the mature eggs of genetically different female fish, including an A0 individual, RCC, and autotetraploid crucian carp F8 were fertilized with mature sperm from the YY crucian carp in vitro during the reproductive season. The embryos were hatched under the conditions previously mentioned. For progeny testing, during the reproductive season, ten one-year-old offspring were selected randomly and dissected to determine sex. The rest five hundred offspring in each hybridization group were squeezed semen artificially to identify sex.

Morphological measurements

The morphological and countable characteristics of the YY crucian carp were examined at two years of age as previously described [32]. The same characteristics in RCC and F8 in Tables 1 and 2 are cited for comparison [14].

Flow cytometry analysis

DNA contents of the YY crucian carp, A1 offspring, all male triploids, and all male tetraploids were measured via flow cytometry analysis to determine the ploidy of each fish. First, approximately 0.5 mL of blood was collected from the caudal vein of each fish using a syringe containing 100 units of sodium heparin. The blood samples were then diluted with ACD buffer to a proper concentration and stained with DAPI (Sigma) at room temperature for 10 min. Following filtration, DNA content measurement was performed in a Partec Cell Counter Analyzer.

DNA contents of the sperm of the YY crucian carp and RCC were analyzed by similar ways with blood cells. Sperms were collected from each fish and diluted with PBS buffer to an appropriate concentration, followed by stained with DAPI, filtration, and measured by the Partec Cell Counter Analyzer.

Chromosome counting

The chromosomes of 12-month-old fish were prepared by peripheral blood cell cultivation according to the procedure reported by Xiao et al. [33]. For each fish, approximately 0.3 mL blood was collected with a syringe containing 0.2 mL 0.1 % sodium heparin. The blood cells were then cultured in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 15 % calf serum (Invitrogen) and incubated in a 5 % CO2 environment at 26° for 68–72 h. Colchicine was added to the medium for a 4 h incubation. The cells were harvested and hypotonically treated with 0.075 M KCl and then fixed in methanol-acetic acid (3:1, v/v) overnight with three changes. Chromosomes were prepared via dropping and air drying, then stained in 4 % Giemsa solution for 30 min, and finally examined microscopically.

Spermatozoa phenotype

The phenotype of spermatozoa was scanned according to Qin et al.[14]. Briefly, RCC and YY crucian carp semen was collected and fixed with 2.5 % glutaraldehyde solution, then with 1 % osmic acid solution. After dehydration, dropping, and desiccation, the sperm samples were subjected to atomized gilding for scanning electron microscopy (X-650 scan-electron micro-scope, Hitachi, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons of the data were analyzed in SPSS Statistics 17.0.

Notes

Abbreviations

RCC: 

Red crucian carp

4nAT: 

The allotetraploid hybrids

CC: 

Common carp

BSB: 

Blunt snout bream

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31430088 and 31201987), Major international cooperation projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31210103918), the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 20114306130001), the Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering and New Products for Developmental Biology of Hunan Province (20134486), the construct program of the key discipline in Hunan province and China and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014 M560645).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Protein Chemistry and Developmental Biology of the State Education Ministry of China, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University

References

  1. Pigneur LM, Hedtke SM, Etoundi E, Van Doninck K. Androgenesis: a review through the study of the selfish shellfish Corbicula spp. Heredity. 2012;108(6):581–91.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bongers ABJ, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Richter CJJ, Komen J. Viable androgenetic YY genotypes of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J Hered. 1999;90(1):195–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Parsons JE, Thorgaard GH. Induced androgenesis in rainbow trout. J Exp Zool. 1984;231(3):407–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Scheerer PD, Thorgaard GH, Allendorf FW. Genetic analysis of androgenetic rainbow trout. J Exp Zool. 1991;260(3):382–290.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tariq Ezaz M, Myers JM, Powell SF, McAndrew BJ, Penman DJ. Sex ratios in the progeny of androgenetic and gynogenetic YY male Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. Aquaculture. 2004;232(1–4):205–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Arai K, Ikeno M, Suzuki R. Production of androgenetic diploid loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus using spermatozoa of natural tetraploids. Aquaculture. 1995;137:131–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu H, Guan B, Xu J, Hou C, Tian H, Chen H. Genetic manipulation of sex ratio for the large-scale breeding of YY super-male and XY all-male yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco (Richardson)). Marine Biotechnol. 2013;15(3):321–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Babiak I, Dobosz S, Goryczko K, Kuzminski H, Brzuzan P, Ciesielski S. Androgenesis in rainbow trout using cryopreserved spermatozoa: the effect of processing and biological factors. Theriogenology. 2002;57:1229–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown KH, Lee RW, Thorgaard GH. Use of androgenesis for estimating maternal and mitochondrial genome effects on development and oxygen consumption in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;143(4):415–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Thorgaard GH, Scheerer PD, Hershberger WK, Mayers JM. Androgenetic rainbow trout produced using sperm from tetraploid males show improved survival. Aquaculture. 1990;85(1–4):215–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yamaha E, Otani S, Minami A, Arai K. Dorso-ventral axis perturbation in goldfish embryos caused by heat- and pressure- shock treatments for chromosome set manipulation. Fish Sci. 2002;68:313–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu S, Liu Y, Zhou G, Zhang X, Luo C, Feng H, et al. The formation of tetraploid stocks of red crucian carp*common carp hybrids as an effect of interspecific hybridization. Aquaculture. 2001;192:171–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Duan W, Qin Q, Chen S, Liu S, Wang J, Zhang C, et al. The formation of improved tetraploid population of red crucian carp x common carp hybrids by androgenesis. Sci China C Life Sci. 2007;50(6):753–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Qin Q, Wang Y, Wang J, Dai J, Xiao J, Hu F, et al. The autotetraploid fish derived from hybridization of Carassius auratus red var. (female) x Megalobrama amblycephala (male). Biol Reprod. 2014;91(4):93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sun Y, Zhang C, Liu S, Duan W, Liu Y. Induced interspecific androgenesis using diploid sperm from allotetraploid hybrids of common carp × red crucian carp. Aquaculture. 2007;264(1–4):47–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Komen H, Thorgaard GH. Androgenesis, gynogenesis and the production of clones in fishes: A review. Aquaculture. 2007;269(1–4):150–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. David CJ, Pandian TJ. Cadaveric sperm induces intergeneric androgenesis in the fish, Hemigrammus caudovittatus. Theriogenology. 2006;65(6):1048–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayers JM, Penman DJ, Rana KJ, Bromage N, Powell SF, McAndrew BJ. Applications of induced androgenesis with tilapia. Aquaculture. 1995;137:149–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Komma D, Endow S. Haploidy and androgenesis in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:11884–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. McKone M, Halpern S. The evolution of androgenesis. Am Nat. 2003;161:641–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Komaru A, Konishi K, Nakayama I, Kobayashi T, Sakai H, Kawamura K. Hermaphroditic freshwater clams in the genus Corbicula produce non-reductional spermatozoa with somatic DNA content. Biol Bull. 1997;193:320–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cherfas N, Gomelsky B, Emelyanova O, Recoubratsky A. Induced diploid gynogenesis and polyploidy in crucian carp, Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch), x common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., hybrids. Aquac Res. 1994;25:943–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu S, Sun Y, Luo K, Liu Y. Evidence of different ploidy eggs produced by diploid F2 hybrids of Carassius auratus (♀) × Cyprinus carpio (♂). Acta Genetica Sinica. 2006;33:304–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu S, Sun Y, Zhang C, Luo K, Liu Y. Production of gynogenetic progeny from allotetraploid hybrids red crucian carp*common carp. Aquaculture. 2004;236:193–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodfellow PN, Lovell-Badge R. SRY and sex determination in mammals. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:71–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, Hawkins JR, Griffiths BL, Smith MJ, et al. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature. 1990;346:240–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. JN V. Sex determination in fish. Genome Biol. 2002;3:reports0052.Google Scholar
  28. Bhise MP, Khan TA. Androgenesis: the best tool for manipulation of fish genomes. Turk J Zool. 2002;26:317–25.Google Scholar
  29. Qin Q, Wang Y, Wang J, Dai J, Liu Y, Liu S. Abnormal chromosome behavior during meiosis in the allotetraploid of Carassius auratus red var (female) * Megalobrama amblycephala (male). BMC Genet. 2014;15:95.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Santhakumar K, Pandian TJ. Production of androgenetic tiger barb, Puntius tetrazona. Aquaculture. 2003;228:37–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bongers ABJ, Veld EPC, Abo-Hashema K, Bremmer IM, Eding E, Komen J, et al. Androgenesis in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L) using UV irradiation in a synthetic ovarian fliud and heat shocks. Aquaculture. 1994;122:119–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu J, Liu S, Xiao J, Zhou Y, You C, He W, et al. Characteristics of diploid and triploid hybrids derived from female Megalobrama amblycephala Yih × male Xenocypris davidi Bleeker. Aquaculture. 2012;364–365:157–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiao J, Kang X, Xie L, Qin Q, He Z, Hu F, et al. The fertility of the hybrid lineage derived from female Megalobrama amblycephalaxmale Culter alburnus. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;151(1–2):61–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhou et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement