Open Access

High resolution physical mapping of single gene fragments on pachytene chromosome 4 and 7 of Rosa

BMC Genetics201516:74

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0233-9

Received: 11 February 2015

Accepted: 16 June 2015

Published: 2 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Rosaceae is a family containing many economically important fruit and ornamental species. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based physical mapping of plant genomes is a valuable tool for map-based cloning, comparative genomics and evolutionary studies, no studies using high resolution physical mapping have been performed in this family. Previously we proved that physical mapping of single-copy genes as small as 1.1 kb is possible on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of Rosa wichurana using Tyramide-FISH. In this study we aimed to further improve the physical map of Rosa wichurana by applying high resolution FISH to pachytene chromosomes.

Results

Using high resolution Tyramide-FISH and multicolor Tyramide-FISH, 7 genes (1.7–3 kb) were successfully mapped on pachytene chromosomes 4 and 7 of Rosa wichurana. Additionally, by using multicolor Tyramide-FISH three closely located genes were simultaneously visualized on chromosome 7. A detailed map of heterochromatine/euchromatine patterns of chromosome 4 and 7 was developed with indication of the physical position of these 7 genes. Comparison of the gene order between Rosa wichurana and Fragaria vesca revealed a poor collinearity for chromosome 7, but a perfect collinearity for chromosome 4.

Conclusions

High resolution physical mapping of short probes on pachytene chromosomes of Rosa wichurana was successfully performed for the first time. Application of Tyramide-FISH on pachytene chromosomes allowed the mapping resolution to be increased up to 20 times compared to mitotic metaphase chromosomes. High resolution Tyramide-FISH and multicolor Tyramide-FISH might become useful tools for further physical mapping of single-copy genes and for the integration of physical and genetic maps of Rosa wichurana and other members of the Rosaceae.

Keywords

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Pachytene Tyramide-FISH Rosa Physical map

Background

Rosa is a genus of the Rosaceae family consisting of approximately 90 genera and approximately 3000 species. Many of these are economically important such as Malus, Prunus, Pyrus, Fragaria, Rubus, Sorbus, Cotoneaster and Crataegus [15]. Approximately 150 species and more than 20.000 cultivars of Rosa are described [6]. Most species have a complex origin [7]. Interestingly, only 7 to 15 species have contributed to the original germplasm of the modern rose cultivars [8]. Rosa species have small genomes and a high level of heterozygosity. Basic chromosome number is x = 7 [1], but ploidy levels range from diploid (2n = 2x = 14) to decaploid (2n = 8x = 56). Genomes of Pyrus [9], Prunus [10], Fragaria [4] and Malus [11] recently have been sequenced, providing valuable information for comparative genomics, gene cloning, marker development, QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection. Comparative analysis of these sequenced genomes has shed more light on the mode of evolution of some Rosaceae genera and species. In contrast, the organization of the Rosa genome has only been poorly investigated and the knowledge about the macro-synteny and collinearity of the Rose genome with other sequenced genomes Rosaceae family is poor.

Genetic maps have been widely used for comparative genomic and genome organization studies [12, 13]. The distance between markers in genetic maps expressed in recombination frequencies, or centimorgans (cM) is known to be unequally distributed along the chromosomes [1417]. Gene order in genome regions with extremely low recombination frequency (e.g. centromeres, heterochromatin) cannot be revealed because of the low resolution of genetic mapping in these regions [18]. In addition, lack of collinearity between parental genomes used for development of the mapping population can cause inaccuracy in genetic maps [19]. In contrast to genetic maps, physical maps show real positions of DNA sequences on the chromosomes. Physical mapping using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) does not depend on recombination frequency, therefore it can be used for gene mapping in “cold spot recombination” regions [18]. But FISH mapping has a lower efficiency than genetic mapping. The integration of physical and genetic maps provides a unique tool combining advantages of both types of maps. FISH-based physical maps have been developed and successfully integrated with genetic maps for many plant species (see review [20]). Direct visualization of DNA sequences on chromosomes by FISH is also a valuable for genome sequencing. FISH mapping improves the quality of genome assembly as demonstrated in tomato [21], cucumber [22] and Amborella [23].

Until now most of the cytogenetic studies in Rosa have been dedicated to karyotyping, chromosome number evaluation and rRNA (5S and 45S) gene mapping [2428]. Further progress in FISH using individual genes or DNA clones (e.g. ESTs, BACs) is required for efficient cytogenetic map construction. Physical mapping of individual genes as small as 1.1 kb has proven to be possible on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of Rosa wichurana using Tyramide-FISH [29]. However, the resolution of Tyramide-FISH on the small mitotic Rosa chromosomes is very low which significantly hampers the construction of a physical map and the determination of the order of DNA sequences. The use of pachytene chromosomes would be an improvement for physical mapping [30]. Pachytene chromosomes are 7–40 times longer than mitotic metaphase chromosomes and therefore provide a higher resolution [21, 30]. Moreover, heterochromatic and euchromatic regions are distinguishable at the pachytene stage [31, 32]. Pachytene bivalents consist of 8 DNA strands instead of 4 in mitotic chromosomes, which also increases the sensitivity of FISH. Also important is that meiotic cells (pollen mother cells, or PMC) synchronously divide providing many cells in the same stage. High resolution FISH mapping on pachytene chromosomes has been used successfully in tomato [14, 21, 3335] and Arabidopsis [31, 3639]. However, for many plant species, pachytene preparation is still very challenging [30, 32, 40, 41].

Rosa wichurana is a diploid species (2n = 2x = 14) that was involved in the origin of modern rose cultivars. This species is a valuable source for resistance to powdery mildew [42, 43] and has been used for construction of several genetic maps [4246]. Moreover, R.wichurana is attractive object for molecular cytogenetic studies because it has intensively growing apical meristems and simple corolla, providing many anthers to be used for pollen mother cells (PMC) isolation and pachytene chromosome preparation. Therefore Rosa wichurana is a good model for the Rosa genus,

In this paper, we improved the SteamDrop protocol [47] for preparation of high quality pachytene chromosomes of Rosa wichurana. We performed physical mapping of 7 genes on pachytene chromosomes 4 and 7 of Rosa wichurana using a high resolution Tyramide-FISH and multicolour Tyramide-FISH. For the first time, multicolor Tyramide-FISH was applied to plant chromosomes. The protocol for multicolor-FISH allowed simultaneous visualization of the physical positions of three genes closely located on chromosome 7 of Rosa wichurana.

Methods

An orthology-based approach for probe design resulted in FISH probes with a length between 1.7 kb and 3 kb

To isolate gene sequences on specific chromosomes of R. wichurana we used orthologous sequences of Fragaria vesca as a reference. The Rosa wichurana chromosomes 4 and 7 correspond to Fragaria vesca pseudochromosomes 7 (FvChr7) and 6 (FvChr6), respectively [29, 48]. Several genes from Fragaria vesca pseudochromosomes 6 and 7 (FvChr 6 and FvChr 7) were randomly selected using the NCBI Map Viewer tool. These candidate genes were then used for BLASTN analysis against the genome of F. vesca (FraVesHawaii_1.0) in order to estimate their copy number in the Fragaria genome and to select only the single-copy genes. Seven genes [MLO-like proteins (MLO2 and MLO3), ATPase (AAA-2), Ubiquitin protein ligase (RIN-2), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), Villin-2-like, mannosylglycoprotein endo-beta-mannosidase (MGM)] which showed significant similarity only to the original sequences of Fragaria vesca were chosen for further analysis. The selected genes were used for BLASTN against nucleotide and EST databases of Rosa at NCBI. Full mRNA sequences of Rosa (Rosa multiflora) MLO genes (JX847132.1, JX847133) were used for primer design to isolate MLO-like genes from R.wichurana. Pairwise alignment of rose MLO mRNA sequences with orthologous Fragaria full length MLO sequences was performed to prevent primer annealing at the intron/exon border.

The other 5 Fragaria full-length gene sequences were used for BLASTN against transcriptome reads of R. x hybrid (NCBI accession number: SRX097578) or R. chinensis transcriptome reads or/and clusters (https://iant.toulouse.inra.fr/). In this way, rose reads with significant similarity to different parts of the Fragaria genes were found and used for primer design.

Amplification and labeling of gene fragments

Primers were designed using CLCbio Genomics Workbench version 7.0 to amplify gene fragments with a length more than 2 kb based on known Fragaria gene sequences and their location on the pseudochromosomes (Table 1). PCR products were generated using designed primers and genomic DNA of R.wichurana. PCR products were obtained with all 7 primer combinations. PCR with primers for villin resulted in a short PCR product of 900 bp, which is too short to be used in Tyramide-FISH experiments on Rosa. The other PCR products which ranged between 1.7 kb and 3 kb were cloned (Table 1) by pGEM-T easy (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) or by pPCR-TOPO kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). At least two clones were sequenced for each primer combination. The partial sequences of the clones used in this study are available as Additional file 1.
Table 1

Sequences of primers for gene fragment isolation and PCR results

Gene

Abbreviation

Primers, 5′-3′

Location on Fragaria pseudo-chromosomes

Expected length PCR product (bp)

Length obtained PCR products (bp)

MLO-like protein

MLO3

F: AAAACACCAACATGGGCAGT

FvChr 7: 15397809..15393519

1675

1700

R: TTCCGAAAATCAAAGGTCGT

MLO-like protein

MLO2

F: AGGATTTCAAGGTCGTGGTG

FvChr6: 34503533..34507423

1852

1800

R: TGGTCGGCTAGCATTTTTCT

ATPase

AAA-2

F: GTTCCCTTTGTCATTGCAG

FvChr7: 21485846.. 21481090

2718

3400

R: ACGGCCTCTTCATCAATT

Ubiquitin protein ligase

RIN-2

F: TCCTTCAGCTACACCATTGAC

FvChr7: 19866961..19871497

2228

2500

R: AAATTGCGCGTTCCTACT

Monodehydroascorbate reductase

MDAR

F: GAGGCGGTATGGTTAATTT

FvChr6: 12864594..12867898

2417

2800

R: AAACTTGGGCTTTGGTGA

Villin-2-like

Villin

F: CTCGCTTCTTCACAACATACT

FvChr6: 33309900..33321407

3851

900

R:TTCACTGCCATTTTCATCCT

Mannosylglycoprotein endo-beta-mannosidase

MGM

F: CGGCATGGAAAATGAGTCAA

FvChr6: 5180627..5186123

3017

3000

R: GAACAAAGGGATCTGCCA

Phenylalanine ammonia lyasea

PAL

F: ACCACTGGKTTTGGTGCWAC

FvChr6:34874086–34877587

-

1700

R: CCYTTGAASCCATAATCCAA

Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Synthasea

P5CS

F: GCTGGCATCCCTGTTGTTAT

FvChr7: 17624431–17630820

-

1700

R: CTTCGGATCGCTAATGAAGC

aData from [29]

For physical mapping of PAL and P5CS genes, previously cloned gene fragments [29], were used.

Plasmid DNA was isolated by the PureLink Quick Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and labeled by Biotin-Nick translation mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), Digoxigenin-Nick Translation mix (Roche) or by a “home-made” Biotin-Nick translation Mix using a “home-labeled” dUTP nucleotide. “Home labeled” nucleotides were prepared according to the previously described protocol [49] using aminoallyl-dUTP (Thermo Scientific) and Biotinamidohexanoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Sigma-Aldish Co., LLC, France). Our “home-made” Nick translation mix (30 μl) consists of 500 ng DNA, 83 μM dATP, dGTP, dCTP, 10.6 μM dTTP, 69 μM biotin-dUTP, 300 mU rDNAse I (Ambion) and 5U DNA Polymerase I (Invitrogen) in NT buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8, 5 mM MgCl2) containing 10 mM beta-mercaptoethanol. The reaction was done at 15 °C for 2 h and stopped by heating at 80 °C for 5 min.

Clone pTa71 containing a 9-kb EcoRI fragment of the 45S rDNA from wheat [50], was labeled using the Digoxigenin-Nick Translation Mix (Roche).

Pachytene chromosome preparation

Rosa wichurana plants were grown in a glass greenhouse under natural conditions in the temperate climate of East Flanders, Belgium. Five to ten anthers from each flower bud were placed on the slide and a drop of 60 % acetic acid was added. Anthers were then disrupted by a needle, heated at 55 °C for 1 min and squashed with a coverslip. The meiotic stages were observed under phase contrast (Zeiss AxioImager M2, Zeiss Company, Germany). Flower buds with most of the anthers containing PMCs in pachytene stage were fixed in Carnoy’s solution (3:1, ethanol:acetic acid) for at least 3 h and transferred into 70 % ethanol for storage at −20 °C.

Flower buds were washed in water for 30–40 min and transferred into 10 mM citric buffer (citric acid, sodium citrate dehydrate, pH 4.7–4.8) for 15–30 min. Anthers were then separated using a pincet and transferred into 50 μl enzyme mixture. One-third to one-fourth of all anthers from a single flower bud were used for the preparation of one tube of cell suspension. The enzyme mixture contained 0.6 % Pectolyase Y-23 (Kikkoman, Tokyo, Japan), 0.6 % Cellulase Onozuka R-10 (Yakult Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 0.2 % Cytohelicase (Sigma-Aldish Co. LLC, France). A modified SteamDrop protocol [47] was used for cell suspension and chromosome preparation. Briefly, 10 μl of cell suspension were added on the slide; after 8–10 s, a drop of 22–28 μl of 1:1 ethanol:acetic acid was applied. When the slide surface became granule-like (50–80 s) steam (3–5 s) was applied to the slides and a second drop of 15–18 μl of 1:2 ethanol:acetic was added. When the granule-like surface appeared again on the slide, steam was applied and 300 μl of 45 % or 60 % acetic acid was added. Then slides were incubated on a heating plate (42 °C) for 15–30 s. A needle was used to spread the drop of acetic acid over the ring of cells on the slide. Acetic acid was removed by positioning the slide vertically on filter paper.

Tyramide-FISH

We used the Tyramide-FISH protocol with an indirect detection system previously optimized for R. wichurana mitotic chromosomes [29]. Prehybridization procedures for single color and two color Tyramide-FISH included overnight incubation at 37 °C, 4 % paraformaldehyde treatment (6–7 min) and dehydration in an ethanol series (70 %, 90 % and 100 %). Probe hybridization and detection for single color Tyramide-FISH were carried out as described [29]. For two color Tyramide-FISH probe hybridization was conducted according to Kirov et al. [29] with a hybridization mixture containing two labeled probes: digoxigenin labeled MLO2 gene and biotin labeled PAL gene. The two probes were detected sequentially. First, the PAL gene was detected by Streptavidin-HRP (1:100, PerkinElmer, Belgium) followed by application of tyramide-biotin (1:25 in plus amplification buffer (PerkinElmer)) application. Then HRP (Horse Radish Peroxidase) was inactivated using 3 % hydrogen peroxide (20 min). After this slides were simultaneously incubated with streptavidin-Cy3 (1:100, Sigma-Aldrich)) and anti-digoxigenin-HRP (1:100, Roche) diluted in blocking buffer (Roche) followed by tyramide-biotin amplification. Biotin from the second layer was detected by Streptavidin-FITC (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).

Zeiss AxioImager M2 (400× and 1000× magnification) equipped with an AxioCam MRm camera and Zen software (Zeiss, Zaventem, Belgium) were used to analyse the hybridisation signal and to capture all images. Relative distance to the signal was calculated by the following formula:

Distance from telomere of the long arm to the signal × 100 % / length of whole arm.

Images were analyzed using ImageJ software. Signal position was measured using the Micromeasure software [51], version 3.3 (http://sites.biology.colostate.edu/MicroMeasure/). Pachytene chromosomes with a similar length were chosen for calculation of centromere index and percentage of heterochromatin. At least 9 pachytene chromosomes were used to determine the location of the Tyramide-FISH signals (Table 2).
Table 2

Characteristics of pachytene chromosome 4 and 7 of R. wichurana

Chr. Nr.

Chromosome length (μm)

Short arm (μm)

Long arm (μm)

Short arm heterochromatin (%)a

Long arm heterochromatin (%)b

Total heterochromatin (%)c

Centromere index

NOR

nd

4

45.6 ± 5.4

11.4 ± 1.4

34.0 ± 4.0

62.0 ± 6.0

21.0 ± 4.5

31.0 ± 4.0

25.0 ± 0.5

 

7

7

38.4 ± 4.2

4.0 ± 0.6

33.3 ± 3.5

88.0 ± 6.7

16.8 ± 4.4

24.3 ± 2.3

10.3 ± 0.8

+

9

a– calculated by the formula: length of heterochromatin of the short arm × 100%/total length of the short arm

b– calculated by the formula: length of heterochromatin of the long arm × 100%/total length of the long arm

c– calculated by the formula: (length of heterochromatin of the short arm + length of heterochromatin of the long arm) × 100 %/total length of the chromosome

d– Number of pachytenes used in the measurements of chromosome lengths and calculation of % heterochromatin

Results

High quality pachytene chromosome preparations suitable for Tyramide-FISH were obtained for Rosa wichurana

Flower buds with a hypanthium size of 3–5 mm had the most PMCs in pachytene stage although also PMC in metaphase I and tetrad stages could be observed in the same flower bud (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Pachytene (a), Metaphase I (b) and Tetrad (c) stages found in a R. wichurana flower bud. Bars = 10 μm

DAPI staining of R wichurana pachytene chromosomes did not reveal strong heterochromatin blocks that can be used as cytogenetic markers. All centromeres are the weakest stained parts of the chromosomes flanked by pericentromeric heterochromatin. Only chromosomes 4 and 7 are distinguishable by their clear presence of heterochromatin patterns on the short arms (Fig. 2, Table 2). In addition chromosome 7 possesses NOR (nucleolar organizing regions) on the short arm.
Fig. 2

Inverted DAPI pictures and ideogram of chromosome 4 (a) and 7 (b). Red signals showed the location of AAA-2 (a) and MGM (b) genes after Tyramide-FISH to verify the correct chromosome number. Stars indicate the centromere position on the chromosomes

To prepare pachytene chromosomes, the SteamDrop protocol was modified by adding a drop of 60 % acetic acid after the second steam application and before drying the cells. This modification improved the chromosome spreading and resulted in a clear 45S rDNA signal on chromosome 7 of Rosa wichurana (Fig. 3a). Moreover, application of Tyramide-FISH on pachytene chromosomes revealed differences in signal frequency between the slides prepared by 15, 30 and 60 s of acetic acid treatment on the heating plate (the final step in modified SteamDrop procedure). The maximum signal-to-noise ratio (visual observation) and signal frequency (60–70 %) were obtained on the slides prepared by 30 s of acetic acid treatment. Both 15 s and 60 s of acetic acid treatment resulted in low signal frequency (10–15 %). In addition the level of background was higher for 15 s and very low for 60 s.
Fig. 3

In situ physical mapping of genes on pachytene chromosomes of Rosa wichurana. FISH with Dig-labeled 45S rDNA (pTA71 plasmid) (a); Tyramide-FISH with MLO3 and P5CS genes, both labeled with biotin (b) and with AAA-2 gene, labeled with biotin (c); Tyramide-FISH with MGM gene labeled with biotin (d) and MDAR gene labeled with biotin (e); Sequential multicolor Tyramide-FISH with digoxigenin labeled MLO2 gene and biotin labeled PAL and MGM genes (f). Centromere of the chromosome that contains the physically mapped gene(s) is indicated by an arrowhead. Bar = 10 μm

Pachytene chromosomes of Rosa wichurana provide up to 20 times higher resolution compared to mitotic chromosomes

The total pachytene chromosome length varied between 235 μm and 411 μm, which is 10–20 times longer than the mitotic chromosomes (20 μm ± 1 μm; [29]). The chromatin compactization of pachytene chromosomes of R. wichurana is 2.4 - 1.4 Mbp μm−1, calculated based on the genome size of 562 Mbp [52]. Taken into account the 0.2 μm - resolution limit for fluorescence microscopy, it can be concluded that the spatial resolution of FISH on R. wichurana pachytene chromosomes is between 300–500 kb.

High resolution physical mapping of gene fragments using Tyramide-FISH

Seven gene fragments resulted in clear Tyramide-FISH twin signals on one pachytene bivalent (Fig. 3, Table 3). Only Tyramide-FISH for the gene RIN-2 resulted in multiple signals distributed over all the chromosomes.
Table 3

Physical location of the target genes on R. wichurana pachytene chromosomes

Gene name

Chromosome number/ arm

Location on chromosome arm (%)a

MLO3

4/L

44.0 ± 1.5

AAA-2

4/L

8.0 ± 1.0

P5CS

4/L

30.0 ± 2.0

MLO2

7/L

44.8 ± 0.5

MDAR

7/L

52.0 ± 1.5

MGM

7/L

18.0 ± 1.5

PAL

7/L

46.6 ± 1.0

RIN-2

Multiple signals

-

a- Distance from telomere of the long arm to the signal × 100 % / length of whole arm

Three genes were mapped on the long arm of pachytene chromosome 4. The AAA-2 gene was mapped in the distal part (relative distance of 8.0 ± 1.0 %) of chromosome 4 (Fig. 3c). The MLO3 and P5CS genes were mapped on more proximal positions, with a relative distance of 44.0 ± 1.5 % and 30.0 ± 2.0 %, respectively (Fig. 3b).

Four genes (MLO2, MDAR, MGM and PAL) were mapped on chromosome 7. MGM was located in the distal part of the chromosome (relative distance of 18.0 ± 1.5 %) (Fig. 3d). PAL, MDAR (Fig. 3e) and MLO2 genes were physically mapped in the middle of the long arm of the the pachytene chromosome 7 with relative positions of 46.6 ± 1.0 %, 52.0 ± 1.5 % and 44.8 ± 0.5 %, respectively. Tyramide-FISH with pairs of the genes (MGM + MLO2, MLO2 + PAL and PAL + MDAR) confirmed the order and location of all genes on the same chromosome.

Tightly linked genes can be distinguished using high resolution multicolor Tyramide-FISH

Because PAL and MLO2 are very closely located on chromosome 7, Tyramide-FISH with PAL and MLO2 resulted in one large signal. Therefore, to determine the order of PAL and MLO2 genes on chromosome 7, multicolor Tyramide-FISH was applied (Fig. 3f). Two-color Tyramide-FISH revealed the order of MLO2, PAL and MGM genes on the same chromosome. In 58 % of the observed pachytene cells (n = 17) closely located red (PAL) and green (MLO2) signals were observed, while the red and green signals in the other 42 % of pachytene cells partially overlapped. These results suggest that the distance between MLO2 and PAL genes is on the border of the spatial resolution of Tyramide-FISH on pachytene chromosome of R. wichurana. Based on the length of the pachytene bivalents carrying non-overlapped signals (41 ± 1.5 μm), the relative length of the mitotic chromosome 7 (10.0 ± 0.1 %; Kirov et al. [47]), the genome size for R. wichurana (562 Mb/1C, [52]) and 0.2 μm - resolution limit for light microscope, we may calculate the physical distance between the MLO2 and PAL genes which is about 270 kb. An overview of the genes located on chromosome 4 and chromosome 7 and their order is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Physical location of 7 target genes on R. wichurana chromosome 7 (RwChr7, left) and 4 (RwChr4, right) versus Fragaria vesca pseudochromosomes 6 (FvChr6) and 7 (FvChr6), correspondently. Signals are shown on digitally straightened pachytene chromosomes and on an ideogram of R. wichurana and compared with pseudochromosome 6 (FvChr6) and 7 (FvChr7) of the F. vesca genome sequence

Discussion

Chromosome preparation is a key factor for Tyramide-FISH success

To our knowledge, this is the first report on the application of FISH on pachytene chromosomes of a member of Rosaceae family. Pachytene chromosome preparation using the SteamDrop procedure has number of advantages [47]: 1) After cell suspensions are prepared they can be stored for months; 2) The chromosome preparation takes only 3–5 min from made cell suspensions; and 3) up to 20 slides can be prepared from one flower bud. Here we modified the SteamDrop protocol [47] for easy pachytene chromosome preparation of Rosa wichurana. One of the modifications is a final treatment of cells by acetic acid providing better chromosome spreading and Tyramide-FISH results. The time of treatment with acetic acid significantly influences the Tyramide-FISH results. Over-treatment as well as insufficient treatment resulted in a manifold reduction of signal frequency. PMCs require an optimal time of acetic acid treatment for reducing the amount of cytoplasm and the thickness of the organic layer covering the chromosomes [53]. Overtreatment of chromosomes by acetic acid results in histone elimination [54] and chromosome becomes flatten which reduces the chromatin accessibility [55] and the amount of electron-rich amino acids (e.g., tyrosine, tryptophan, phenylalanine) required for tyramide anchoring after HRP activation [56]. Therefore the chromosome preparation procedure is the most important step in high resolution physical mapping using Tyramide-FISH and should be optimized first to obtain satisfactory results.

Resolution of FISH on pachytene chromosomes of R. wichurana

Mitotic chromosomes of Rosa wichurana are very small, ranging from 2.2 to 3.7 μm in length [29]. Their small size leads to a lower resolution (5–5.5 Mb) when using FISH, which hampers the use of FISH for physical mapping in R. wichurana. In contrast, pachytene chromosomes of R. wichurana are up to 20 times longer than mitotic chromosomes, which is comparable with data obtained on banana [41], Arabidopsis [39], tomato [57], Medicago truncatula [32] and rice [58]. Based on the genome size for R. wichurana (562 Mb/1C, [52]), 0.2 μm - resolution limit for light microscope and total length of pachytene chromosomes (235–411 μm) we can conclude that the spatial resolution of FISH mapping on R. wichurana pachytene chromosomes is 270–500 kb. Pachytene stage and location of probe in euchromatin or heterochromatin region influence on FISH resolution [14]. Resolution of FISH is much higher for zygotene, leptotene and early pachytene. For example the order of partially overlapped BAC clones can be determined on early pachytene chromosomes [35]. DNA condensation varies significantly along a pachytene chromosome – it is highly condensed in heterochromatin regions and less condensed in euchromatin regions [30, 59]. For example, the FISH resolution in the euchromatic regions of tomato pachytene is 10 times higher than in heterochromatin regions [30]. For Rosa wichurana, clear pericentromeric heterochromatin was observed on all pachytene chromosomes but also a number of weak stained heterochromatin bands were identified in euchromatic parts. Therefore, further study is necessary in order to estimate the precise resolution of FISH in heterochromatin and euchromatin of pachytene chromosomes of R. wichurana to convert microscopic distance into base pairs.

Advantages and limitations of Tyramide-FISH for high-resolution physical mapping

Tyramide-FISH on pachytene chromosomes resulted in a higher signal frequency compared to mitotic chromosomes. We were able to visualize the signals on 70 % of the pachytene spreads. This is much higher than reported for Tyramide-FISH on mitotic chromosomes [29, 60]. Moreover, Tyramide-FISH allows physical mapping of short DNA fragments. Gene fragments with a length as small as 1.7Kb were successfully visualized on pachytene chromosomes of R. wichurana. Because most of the genes are free of repetitive DNA it is not necessary to use blocking DNA (e.g. C o t fraction) for physical mapping as is the case for physical mapping by BAC-FISH [61]. The efficiency of physical mapping using Tyramide-FISH is high. In this study 7 out of the 8 (87.5 %) isolated genes were successfully mapped on the pachytene chromosomes.

However, Tyramide-FISH have some disadvantages for physical mapping. Tyramide-FISH is highly dependent on the quality of the slide preparation. And another drawback of Tyramide-FISH is that sometimes gene fragments give multiple signals which cannot be reliably physically mapped, e.g., the RIN-2 probe in this study and [62]. In addition, multicolor Tyramide-FISH is a quite time-consuming process because each probe is detected sequentially.

Advantages of an orthology-based probe design

Different strategies can be used for single gene probe design for FISH mapping. One approach is the use of EST [29] or genomic sequences [59, 62] of genes for primer design and further cloning of PCR products. Another strategy is to isolate orthologous gene fragments of one genus based on the whole genome sequence of another closely related genus. This approach is useful for the isolation of genes of which no full-length sequences or mRNA sequences are available in databases. This latter approach allowed for Rosa wichurana the design of specific primers and amplification of gene fragments with the predicted size based on the genome of Fragaria vesca. Moreover, it allowed the development of probes containing exon-intron fragments of the genes. On the contrary, EST clones often are too short as FISH probes and can contain highly conserved exon sequences which cross hybridize with other members of the same gene family, resulting in multiple signals ditributed along all chromosomes [62].

Macro-synteny between R. wichurana chromosome 4 and 7 and Fragaria vesca pseudochromosomes

In our study, three genes, physically mapped on R. wichurana chromosome 4 (RwChr4), showed a perfect collinearity with F. vesca pseudochromosome 7 (FvChr7). The collinearity between R. wichurana chromosome 7 and FvChr6, however, is not well established yet. Tyramide-FISH results on mitotic chromosomes showed that OOMT and PAL genes, belonging to the same pseudochromosome FvChr6 of F.vesca, were located on two different chromosomes (chromosome 1 and 7) in R. wichurana [29]. Previously Gar et al. [48] also found that genes located on FvChr6 are located on two different linkage groups of R. wichurana, suggesting an ancient translocation event. Here we physically mapped 3 additional genes located terminal (MLO2 and MGM) and proximal (MDAR) on FvChr6. Our Tyramide-FISH results show that these 3 genes are all located on chromosome 7 of R. wichurana. Gathering all results from physical mapping on mitotic [29] and pachytene chromosomes and genetic mapping [48], it can be hypothesized that FvChr6 has a complex evolutionary history since Fragaria and Rosa were diverged from a common ancestor.

Conclusion

Tyramide-FISH mapping of single-copy genes on pachytene chromosomes opens possibilities for the development of detailed physical maps of R. wichurana chromosomes. This approach will assist the integration of physical and genetic maps and will accelerate comparative genomic studies of genera in the Rosaceae family. For further experiments, cytogenetic marker development would be valuable for the identification of all pachytene chromosomes of R. wichurana. The application of larger numbers of single-copy gene probes covering all chromosomes of the karyotype of Rosa and the construction of the integrated genetic and physical maps for all chromosomes of R. wichurana is the scope of our future research.

Availability of supporting data

The partial sequences of the gene fragments used for Tyramide-FISH are available as Additional file 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Jorien Oomen for her technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Genetics, Biotechnology, Plant Breeding and Seed Science, Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
(2)
Center of Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
(3)
Plant Sciences Unit, Applied Genetics and Breeding, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO)

References

  1. Robertson KR, Phipps JB, Rohrer JR, Smith PG. A synopsis of genera in Maloideae (Rosaceae). Systematic Botany. 1991;16(2):376–394.Google Scholar
  2. Dirlewanger E, Graziano E, Joobeur T, Garriga-Calderé F, Cosson P, Howad W, et al. Comparative mapping and marker-assisted selection in Rosaceae fruit crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(26):9891–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark J, Morgan DR, et al. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst Evol. 2007;266(1–2):5–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Shulaev V, Sargent DJ, Crowhurst RN, Mockler TC, Folkerts O, Delcher AL, et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat Genet. 2011;43(2):109–16.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Longhi S, Giongo L, Buti M, Surbanovski N, Viola R, Velasco R, Ward JA, Sargent DJ. Molecular genetics and genomics of the Rosoideae: state of the art and future perspectives. Horticulture Research. 2014;1:1.Google Scholar
  6. Cairns T. Modern Roses XI. San Diego: Academic; 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Koopman WJ, Wissemann V, De Cock K, Van Huylenbroeck J, De Riek J, Sabatino GJ, et al. AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: a case study in Rosa (Rosaceae). Am J Bot. 2008;95(3):353–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gudin S. Rose breeding technologies. In: III International Symposium on Rose Research and Cultivation. 547. 2000. p. 23–33.Google Scholar
  9. Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu S, et al. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res. 2013;23(2):396–408.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S, Jung S, Shu S, Marroni F, et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2013;45(5):487–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Affourtit J, Dhingra A, Cestaro A, Kalyanaraman A, et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus [times] domestica Borkh.). Nat Genet. 2010;42(10):833–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gale M, Devos K. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science. 1998;282(5389):656–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Burow MD, Draye X, Elsik CG, Jiang C-X, et al. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell Online. 2000;12(9):1523–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng Z, Presting GG, Buell CR, Wing RA, Jiang J. High-resolution pachytene chromosome mapping of bacterial artificial chromosomes anchored by genetic markers reveals the centromere location and the distribution of genetic recombination along chromosome 10 of rice. Genetics. 2001;157(4):1749–57.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Giraut L, Falque M, Drouaud J, Pereira L, Martin OC, Mézard C. Genome-wide crossover distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis reveals sex-specific patterns along chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(11):e1002354.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Poursarebani N, Nussbaumer T, Šimková H, Šafář J, Witsenboer H, Oeveren J, et al. Whole genome profiling (WGP™) and shotgun sequencing delivers an anchored, gene‐decorated, physical map assembly of bread wheat chromosome 6A. Plant J. 2014;79:334–47.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Talbert PB, Henikoff S. Centromeres convert but don’t cross. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(3):e1000326.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Karafiátová M, Bartoš J, Kopecký D, Ma L, Sato K, Houben A, et al. Mapping nonrecombining regions in barley using multicolor FISH. Chromosome Res. 2013;21(8):739–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Staub JE, Serquen FC, Gupta M. Genetic markers, map construction, and their application in plant breeding. HortSci. 1996;31(5):729–41.Google Scholar
  20. Jiang J, Gill BS. Current status and the future of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in plant genome research. Genome. 2006;49(9):1057–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Shearer LA, Anderson LK, de Jong H, Smit S, Goicoechea JL, Roe BA, Hua A, Giovannoni JJ, Stack SM. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Optical Mapping To Correct Scaffold Arrangement in the Tomato Genome. G3: Genes| Genomes| Genetics. 2014;doi: https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.011197.
  22. Huang S, Li R, Zhang Z, Li L, Gu X, Fan W, et al. The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nat Genet. 2009;41(12):1275–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chamala S, Chanderbali AS, Der JP, Lan T, Walts B, Albert VA, et al. Assembly and validation of the genome of the nonmodel basal angiosperm Amborella. Science. 2013;342(6165):1516–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma Y, Islam-Faridi M, Crane C, Ji Y, Stelly D, Price H, et al. In situ hybridization of ribosomal DNA to rose chromosomes. J Hered. 1997;88(2):158–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernández-Romero M, Torres A, Millán T, Cubero J, Cabrera A. Physical mapping of ribosomal DNA on several species of the subgenus Rosa. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;103(6–7):835–8.Google Scholar
  26. Akasaka M, Ueda Y, Koba T. Karyotype analyses of five wild rose species belonging to septet A by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosome Sci. 2002;6(1):17–26.Google Scholar
  27. Akasaka M, Ueda Y, Koba T. Karyotype analysis of wild rose species belonging to septets B, C and D by molecular cytogenetic method. Breed Sci. 2003;53(2):177–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tian M, Zhang T, Tang K-X, Zhang H, Wang Q-G LIS-B, Yan H-J, et al. FISH Analysis of 45S rDNA on the Chromosomes of Chinese Old Garden Roses. J Yunnan Agric Univ (Natural Science). 2013;3:020.Google Scholar
  29. Kirov I, Van Laere K, De Riek J, De Keyser E, Van Roy N, Khrustaleva L. Anchoring Linkage Groups of the Rosa Genetic Map to Physical Chromosomes with Tyramide-FISH and EST-SNP Markers. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95793.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hans de Jong J, Fransz P, Zabel P. High resolution FISH in plants–techniques and applications. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4(7):258–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fransz PF, Armstrong S, de Jong JH, Parnell LD, van Drunen C, Dean C, et al. Integrated Cytogenetic Map of Chromosome Arm 4S of A. thaliana: Structural Organization of Heterochromatic Knob and Centromere Region. Cell. 2000;100(3):367–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kulikova O, Gualtieri G, Geurts R, Kim DJ, Cook D, Huguet T, et al. Integration of the FISH pachytene and genetic maps of Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2001;27(1):49–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhong X-B, Bodeau J, Fransz P, Williamson V, van Kammen A, De Jong J, et al. FISH to meiotic pachytene chromosomes of tomato locates the root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi-1 and the acid phosphatase gene Aps-1 near the junction of euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome arms 6S and 6 L, respectively. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98(3–4):365–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Szinay D, Chang SB, Khrustaleva L, Peters S, Schijlen E, Bai Y, et al. High‐resolution chromosome mapping of BACs using multi‐colour FISH and pooled‐BAC FISH as a backbone for sequencing tomato chromosome 6. Plant J. 2008;56(4):627–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Cheng Z, Buell CR, Wing RA, Jiang J. Resolution of fluorescence in-situ hybridization mapping on rice mitotic prometaphase chromosomes, meiotic pachytene chromosomes and extended DNA fibers. Chromosome Res. 2002;10(5):379–87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ziolkowski PA, Kaczmarek M, Babula D, Sadowski J. Genome evolution in Arabidopsis/Brassica: conservation and divergence of ancient rearranged segments and their breakpoints. Plant J. 2006;47(1):63–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ziolkowski PA, Sadowski J. FISH-mapping of rDNAs and Arabidopsis BACs on pachytene complements of selected Brassicas. Genome. 2002;45(1):189–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lysak MA, Pecinka A, Schubert I. Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species. Chromosome Res. 2003;11(3):195–204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Fransz P, Armstrong S, Alonso‐blanco C, Fischer TC, Torres‐ruiz RA, Jones G. Cytogenetics for the model system Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;13(6):867–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Iacia AAS, Pinto-Maglio CA. Mapping pachytene chromosomes of coffee using a modified protocol for fluorescence in situ hybridization. AoB Plants. 2013;5:plt040.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. De Capdeville G, Júnior MTS, Szinay D, Diniz LEC, Wijnker E, Swennen R, et al. The potential of high-resolution BAC-FISH in banana breeding. Euphytica. 2009;166(3):431–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Dugo MDLL, Satovic Z, Millan T, Cubero JI, Rubiales D, Cabrera A, et al. Genetic mapping of QTLs controlling horticultural traits in diploid roses. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;111(3):511–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Moghaddam HH, Leus L, De Riek J, Van Huylenbroeck J, Van Bockstaele E. Construction of a genetic linkage map with SSR, AFLP and morphological markers to locate QTLs controlling pathotype-specific powdery mildew resistance in diploid roses. Euphytica. 2012;184:413–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Crespel L, Chirollet M, Durel CE, Zhang D, Meynet J, Gudin S. Mapping of qualitative and quantitative phenotypic traits in Rosa using AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105:1207–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Spiller M, Linde M, Hibrand-Saint Oyant L, Tsai CJ, Byrne DH, Smulders MJ, et al. Towards a unified genetic map for diploid roses. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122(3):489–500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Shupert DA, Byrne DH, Pemberton HB. Inheritance of flower traits, leaflet number and prickles in roses. Acta Horticult. 2007;751:331–5.Google Scholar
  47. Kirov I, Divashuk M, Van Laere K, Soloviev A, Khrustaleva L. An easy “SteamDrop” method for high quality plant chromosome preparation. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7(1):21.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Gar O, Sargent DJ, Tsai C-J, Pleban T, Shalev G, Byrne DH, et al. An autotetraploid linkage map of rose (Rosa hybrida) validated using the strawberry (Fragaria vesca) genome sequence. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20463.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Henegariu O, Bray-Ward P, Ward DC. Custom fluorescent-nucleotide synthesis as an alternative method for nucleic acid labeling. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(3):345–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Gerlach W, Bedbrook J. Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7(7):1869–85.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Reeves A. MicroMeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome. 2001;44(3):439–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yokoya K, Roberts A, Mottley J, Lewis R, Brandham P. Nuclear DNA amounts in roses. Ann Bot. 2000;85(4):557–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Martin R, Busch W, Herrmann R, Wanner G. Efficient preparation of plant chromosomes for high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Chromosome Res. 1994;2(5):411–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Dick C, Johns E. The effect of two acetic acid containing fixatives on the histone content of calf thymus deoxyribonucleoprotein and calf thymus tissue. Exp Cell Res. 1968;51(2):626–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sugiyama S, Yoshino T, Kanahara H, Shichiri M, Fukushi D, Ohtani T. Effects of acetic acid treatment on plant chromosome structures analyzed by atomic force microscopy. Anal Biochem. 2004;324(1):39–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Bobrow MN, Shaughnessy KJ, Litt GJ. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification: II. Application to membrane immunoassays. J Immunol Methods. 1991;137(1):103–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhong X-B, de Jong JH, Zabel P. Preparation of tomato meiotic pachytene and mitotic metaphase chromosomes suitable for fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome Res. 1996;4(1):24–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Cheng Z, Buell CR, Wing RA, Gu M, Jiang J. Toward a cytological characterization of the rice genome. Genome Res. 2001;11(12):2133–41.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang C-JR, Harper L, Cande WZ. High-resolution single-copy gene fluorescence in situ hybridization and its use in the construction of a cytogenetic map of maize chromosome 9. Plant Cell Online. 2006;18(3):529–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Pérez R, De Bustos A, Jouve N, Cuadrado A. Localization of Rad50, a single-copy gene, on group 5 chromosomes of wheat, using a FISH protocol employing tyramide for signal amplification (Tyr-FISH). Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;125(4):321–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Hanson RE, Zwick MS, Choi S, Islam-Faridi MN, Wing RA, Price H, et al. Fluorescent in situ hybridization of a bacterial artificial chromosome. Genome. 1995;38(4):646–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Khrustaleva L, Kirov I, Romanov D, Budylin M, Lapitskaya I, Kiseleva A, et al. The chromosome organization of genes and some types of extragenic DNA in Allium. Acta Horticult. 2012;969:43–51.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kirov et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.