Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Genetics

Open Access

MC1R diversity in Northern Island Melanesia has not been constrained by strong purifying selection and cannot explain pigmentation phenotype variation in the region

  • Heather L. Norton1Email author,
  • Elizabeth Werren2 and
  • Jonathan Friedlaender3
BMC Genetics201516:122

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0277-x

Received: 26 June 2015

Accepted: 6 October 2015

Published: 19 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Variation in human skin pigmentation evolved in response to the selective pressure of ultra-violet radiation (UVR). Selection to maintain darker skin in high UVR environments is expected to constrain pigmentation phenotype and variation in pigmentation loci. Consistent with this hypothesis, the gene MC1R exhibits reduced diversity in African populations from high UVR regions compared to low-UVR non-African populations. However, MC1R diversity in non-African populations that have evolved under high-UVR conditions is not well characterized.

Methods

In order to test the hypothesis that MC1R variation has been constrained in Melanesians the coding region of the MC1R gene was sequenced in 188 individuals from Northern Island Melanesia. The role of purifying selection was assessed using a modified McDonald Kreitman’s test. Pairwise FST was calculated between Melanesian populations and populations from the 1000 Genomes Project. The SNP rs2228479 was genotyped in a larger sample (n = 635) of Melanesians and tested for associations with skin and hair pigmentation.

Results

We observe three nonsynonymous and two synonymous mutations. A modified McDonald Kreitman’s test failed to detect a significant signal of purifying selection. Pairwise FST values calculated between the four islands sampled here indicate little regional substructure in MC1R. When compared to African, European, East and South Asian populations, Melanesians do not exhibit reduced population divergence (measured as FST) or a high proportion of haplotype sharing with Africans, as one might expect if ancestral haplotypes were conserved across high UVR populations in and out of Africa. The only common nonsynonymous polymorphism observed, rs2228479, is not significantly associated with skin or hair pigmentation in a larger sample of Melanesians.

Conclusions

The pattern of sequence diversity here does not support a model of strong selective constraint on MC1R in Northern Island Melanesia This absence of strong constraint, as well as the recent population history of the region, may explain the observed frequencies of the derived rs2228479 allele. These results emphasize the complex genetic architecture of pigmentation phenotypes, which are controlled by multiple, possibly interacting loci. They also highlight the role that population history can play in influencing phenotypic diversity in the absence of strong natural selection.

Keywords

Pigmentation phenotypeNatural selectionIsland Melanesia

Background

Human skin and hair pigmentation are highly variable traits that are controlled by multiple genetic loci [114]. Skin pigmentation in humans is tightly correlated with the intensity of ultra-violet radiation (UVR) [15]; darker pigmentation is commonly observed in populations originating from regions of higher UVR, while lighter skin color is common to populations in lower UVR regions. The geographic structure of human skin pigmentation variation strongly supports a model in which pigmentation phenotype has been influenced by natural selection [1517]. It has been proposed that darker skin color in hominins evolved with the loss of body fur and hair, becoming established some time around 1.2 million years ago (mya) [18], presumably to protect against UV-induced damage to DNA and folic acid photolysis [19, 20]. Ultimately alleles causing lighter skin increased in frequency in populations expanding into lower UVR regions, possibly to increase the potential for vitamin D synthesis [15, 21].

Skin pigmentation is primarily determined by the amount, type, and distribution of melanin, one of the primary chromophores of the skin. Melanin (particularly the alkali-insoluble brown-black eumelanin) acts as both a barrier to and filter of UVR—it scatters UVR and limits its penetration of the epidermis [22, 23]. This photoprotective property takes on particular evolutionary significance in regions where UVR is high, as both the long (UVA) and short (UVB) wavelength radiation that reaches the earth’s surface have cytotoxic and mutagenic effects with potentially significant effects on fitness. UVB is absorbed by DNA, resulting in mutations such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6–4) pyrimidine photoproducts [24, 25], both of which play a role in photocarcinogenesis [26]. The ability of melanin, particularly eumelanin, to minimize the potential cancer-causing properties of UVR has led some to speculate that darker skin pigmentation should be favored by natural selection in regions where UVR is high [20], although others argue that this is at best a weak selective force given the late age of onset of many fatal skin cancers [15, 16, 27, 28]. A perhaps more relevant evolutionary argument for the evolution and maintenance of a highly melanized skin in regions of high UVR is the need to minimize UVA mediated photolysis of the B-vitamin folate [19]. Folic acid is involved in DNA synthesis and repair as well as spermatogenesis [29, 30], and folic acid deficiencies in reproductive-age females have been linked to an increased risk of neural tube birth defects [31, 32]. As with the photoprotection hypothesis, the folic acid hypothesis predicts that darker skin color should be maintained by purifying selection in high UVR regions [15, 16, 33].

A genetic locus known to influence human skin and hair pigmentation is the MC1R gene, which encodes the melanocortin-1 receptor, a 7-pass transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor found on the surface of melanocyte cells. When the hormone α-MSH binds to the MC1R, activation of adenyl cyclase results in increased levels of cAMP. This leads to an increase in the activity of tyrosinase, the rate-limiting enzyme of melanogenesis, as well as increased levels of tyrosinase-related proteins (TRP)-1 and −2 [34, 35], ultimately resulting in eumelanin synthesis. However, if instead the antagonist agouti-signaling protein binds to the MC1R, pheomelanin production results. Despite its small size (951 bp), the MC1R gene harbors a high number of polymorphisms, including several loss-of-function mutations that are associated with reduced skin color, melanoma, freckling, and red or blond hair [7, 3639]. MC1R mutations are also associated with a reduced DNA-repair capacity, possibly explaining the link between MC1R and melanoma risk [40, 41].

MC1R has received particular attention in studies of human evolution because of its unusual levels and patterns of sequence diversity. Unlike many loci, which exhibit higher levels of diversity in African populations, MC1R diversity is highest in Eurasian populations [42, 43]. The lower sequence diversity observed in Africans is commonly attributed to purifying selection, while the higher diversity in Eurasian populations has been alternatively interpreted as being due to either relaxed functional constraint or positive selection for lighter skin color [42, 43]. It has been suggested that the higher diversity observed at MC1R can be attributed in part to a high mutation rate related to the elevated CpG content of the region [37]. This makes the reduced diversity in high-UVR African populations all the more notable.

Evidence for purifying selection on MC1R in African and other high-UVR populations rests primarily on low levels of nucleotide diversity and the ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphisms and divergent sites (assessed using McDonald-Kreitman and HKA tests) [4244]. The higher sequence diversity observed at MC1R in non-African populations has been argued to be a signal of diversifying selection [43], although this is not supported by McDonald Kreitman and HKA tests [42]. Tests of natural selection that rely on the site frequency spectrum, inter-population divergence, and extended haplotype homozygosity are also in conflict as to the nature of selection acting on MC1R in non-African populations [10, 37, 42, 45, 46].

Because of its association with several phenotypic traits in European (and to a lesser extent East Asian) populations, MC1R has been extensively sequenced in populations living in low UVR regions. However, far less is known of MC1R sequence diversity in high UVR populations outside of Africa, including whether or not polymorphisms segregating in such populations may be responsible for variation in skin or hair pigmentation phenotype in these regions. Because MC1R is commonly associated with mutations that lead to a decrease in skin pigmentation, it is generally assumed that MC1R variation is tightly constrained by purifying selection in high UVR regions. However, it is possible that mutations leading to an increase in the synthesis of eumelanin may have been favored by positive selection. While such mutations in MC1R are believe to have played an important role in adaptation following the loss of body hair in hominins 1.2 mya [18], there is little evidence to date for more recent mutations with this effect occurring in humans. As such, most investigations of selection acting on MC1R in high-UVR populations focus on the role of purifying, rather than positive, selection.

Early reports of sequence variation in MC1R indicated that the gene was under strong functional constraint in populations from Papua New Guinea as well as Africa, as one might expect if purifying selection has acted to remove nonsynonymous variants resulting in lighter skin color [42, 43] across high UVR regions. However, those studies sampled only a small number of Melanesians (32 chromosomes) [42], resulting in a limited picture of MC1R diversity in high-UVR non-African populations. In order to accurately assess the extent of variation at MC1R in Melanesia, a broader sample is critical, due to the complex population history of the region [4751]. Archaeological evidence indicates that modern humans reached Near Oceania (Sahul, the New Guinea and Australia landmasses, the Bismarck Archipelago, and much of the Solomon islands) by 49,000 YBP [52, 53], spreading as far east as the island of Buka in the Solomons by 29,000 YBP [54]. The region later saw a major influx of migrants speaking languages belonging to the Proto-Oceanic Austronesian language family around 4 KYA [55, 56] originating from a homeland in Taiwan. Thus, while MC1R variation is expected to have been tightly constrained during much of the first ~30,000–40,000 years of human habitation in Melanesia, the migration of Austronesian speakers into the region and their subsequent admixture with resident populations may have introduced nonsynonymous mutations more commonly found in low-UVR regions. If not quickly removed by strong purifying selection such variants may contribute to observed variation in pigmentation phenotype.

Populations from Island Melanesia are darkly pigmented compared to populations of northern Europe and Asia [57], as expected if pigmentation phenotype reflects adaptation to UVR intensity [15]. However, despite experiencing high levels of UVR, Northern Island Melanesian populations exhibit a striking amount of variation in skin pigmentation [58]. Perhaps even more unusually, some Melanesians also exhibit a characteristic “blond hair” phenotype that is observed from Northern Island Melanesia throughout the Solomon Islands, which can be partially explained by a nonsynonymous variant in the TYRP1 gene [58, 59]. Variation in skin and hair pigmentation is particularly pronounced between different islands of Northern Island Melanesia, including the island of Bougainville (located at the northwest tip of the Solomon Islands chain) and islands in the Bismarck Archipelago. It is highly unlikely that this variation is due to very fine scale adaptation to UVR differences in the region [58]. Instead, this variation suggests that even in a high-UVR environment pigmentation phenotype may vary so long as it is maintained above a protective melanin “threshold” [58, 60]. MC1R, known to influence skin and hair color in European and East Asian populations [1, 36, 38, 39, 61, 62] is a possible candidate to explain a portion of this observed variation.

Here we survey sequence variation in the coding region of the MC1R gene in 188 Island Melanesians from four different islands: New Hanover, New Britain, New Ireland, and Bougainville. To our knowledge this is the most extensive survey of MC1R sequence variation in the region to date. We use these data to address three questions pertaining to the evolution of MC1R sequence variation in Northern Island Melanesian populations and the role of MC1R in shaping phenotypic diversity in the region. Specifically we set out to test the hypothesis that variation in MC1R has been constrained in these populations by purifying selection. We also characterized regional (inter-island) and global levels of variation at MC1R in order to assess the roles of selection and population history in shaping variation at MC1R in Northern Island Melanesia. Finally, we tested for associations between MC1R polymorphisms and quantitatively measured skin and hair pigmentation phenotype to evaluate the role of MC1R in shaping local pigmentation phenotype.

Methods

Sample collection

The pigmentation measurements reported here were originally collected as part of a larger study examining phenotypic variation and population history in Island Melanesia by H.L.N. and J.S.F conducted in 2000 and 2003. Individuals were sampled from islands throughout Northern Island Melanesia, with an emphasis on the islands of New Britain, New Hanover, New Ireland, and Bougainville (Fig. 1). Individuals speaking languages belonging to the Oceanic division of the Austronesian (AN) phylum as well as speakers of unrelated non-Austronesian (Papuan) languages were recruited [50]. In total 1135 adults were sampled, of which 188 were used here in DNA sequencing and an additional 444 in the genotyping of the rs2228479 SNP. DNA samples were chosen for sequencing and genotyping based on the following factors: the quantity and quality of available DNA, representation of all four major islands and two linguistic phyla in the region, and, where possible, an attempt to focus heavily on 1–3 neighborhoods or subpopulations within an island (in an effort to minimize intra-island substructure).
Fig. 1

Map of study region, highlighting the four main islands sampled (New Hanover, New Britain, New Ireland, and Bougainville). Numbers next to each island represent the total number of individuals sequenced and genotyped from each island

Individuals were assigned to categories according to sex, island, neighborhood, and linguistic phylum. In order to be assigned to a particular island, neighborhood, or linguistic phylum an individual and both of his or her parents needed to also be from that island/neighborhood or speak a language belonging to the same phylum. All individuals gave their informed consent to participate in the study, including the measurement of pigmentation data and the examination and publication of genetic variation. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for data collection and analyses were obtained from Temple University (IRB 99–226), The Pennsylvania State University (IRB 00 M558-2), and the Papua New Guinea Medical Research Advisory Committee. Approval was granted for all data collection sites. This was a collaborative project with the PNG Institute of Medical Research.

Pigmentation measurement

Quantitative measurements of skin and hair pigmentation were taken using the DermaSpectrometer (Cortex Technology, Hadsund, Denmark) following the practices described in Norton et al. [58]. The DermaSpectrometer estimates the concentrations of the two primary chromophores of the skin, hemoglobin and melanin, and reports this as the melanin (M) index. The M index provides a quantitative measure of skin color that is due primarily to the effects of melanin alone [63].

MC1R sequencing and genotyping

The coding region of the MC1R gene (951 bp) was amplified in the 191 Melanesian samples from the islands of Bougainville (N = 36), New Hanover (n = 60), New Britain (n = 32), and New Ireland (n = 57). Sequence was also obtained from three individuals who could not be clearly assigned to any one of these four islands (see Sample Collection ). Product amplification was verified using gel electrophoresis, and amplified products were purified for sequencing using the GeneJet Purification kit (Life Technologies). Sequence data were aligned to the human reference sequence using the Geneious 6.0 software package [64]. Variants were identified using the “Find Heterozygotes” feature in Geneious and confirmed by visual inspection. Haplotypes were computationally phased using the program Phase 2.1.1 [65], and all phases were correctly inferred (p > 0.85) Melanesian sequences were later aligned with the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) MC1R sequence and African (LWK, YRI), East Asian (CHB, CHS, JPT), European (CEU, FIN, GBR, IBS, and TSI), and South Asian (BEB, GIH, ITU, PJL, STU) samples sequenced as part of the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000Genomes.org, accessed on August 28, 2014).

In order to test for the effect of the derived allele at rs2228479 on skin and hair pigmentation in a larger sample of Melanesians we utilized published genotype and phenotype data from these individuals [66]. To obtain genotype data on additional individuals we designed separate amplification primers (available from the authors on request) to amplify a 695 bp region around rs2228479. The restriction enzyme NspI, which recognizes the derived allele, was used to digest these amplified fragments under standard conditions. Digested products were visualized using gel electrophoresis.

Statistical analyses

Summary statistics for MC1R sequence diversity and polymorphism and divergence were calculated in DNASp v5.10.1 [67, 68]. Two measures of nucleotide diversity were calculated: π [69], which is based on the average number of nucleotide differences between two sequences randomly drawn from a sample; and θ, which is based on the proportion of segregating sites in the sample [70]. Tajima’s D, a summary of the allele frequency spectrum that tests the null hypothesis of mutation-drift equilibrium and constant population size (under which π and θ are approximately equal) was also calculated [71]. A negative value of Tajima’s D indicates an excess of rare alleles, which may occur when a population is growing or when a gene is targeted by purifying selection. Positive values may be indicative of a population bottleneck or balancing selection. We assessed statistical significance of observed Tajima’s D values by comparing them to values obtained from 10,000 simulations under a standard neutral model. Because demographic history (e.g. a population bottleneck) can mimic the effects of selection, we also compared observed values in the Melanesian sample those obtained under 10,000 simulations of a simple bottleneck model marking the divergence of Melanesian populations from an ancestral Eurasian population. As no well-defined demographic model has yet been developed to characterize the population history of the five populations used here (the four 1000 Genome populations and the Melanesians), we use bottleneck and divergence parameters estimates for a New Guinea Highlands population estimated by Wollstein et al. [72]. This model is designed primarily to capture the reduction in diversity associated with the initial colonization of Melanesia.

In order to test the hypothesis that MC1R has been shaped by purifying selection in Island Melanesian populations we use a modification of the McDonald-Kreitman test, which compares the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphisms to the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous fixed differences [73]. An advantage of using the McDonald-Kreitman test over other site-frequency spectrum based tests (such as Tajima’s D and Fay and Wu’s H) is that it is relatively insensitive to variation in demographic history [74, 75]. Due to the small number of segregating sites that we observe in the Melanesian sample (five), we follow Harding et al. [42] and use an exact test described by Sokal and Rohlf (1969). In this test, we use the number of fixed nonsynonymous (ten) to synonymous (six) changes between humans and chimpanzee, and assume that new nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations will occur with a binomial probability of 0.625 and 0.375, respectively [42]. The sum of probabilities for the observed ratio of nonsynonymous (n = 3) to synonymous (n = 2) polymorphisms in Melanesians as well as for all other equally or less likely probabilities provides a test of this null hypothesis.

Allele frequency distinctions between islands and between linguistic phyla were tested for using a χ 2 test implemented in DNASp [67]. Tests of Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium for each Melanesian island were performed in PLINK [76]. Pairwise FST values for the coding region of MC1R were calculated using DNASp between each of the four Melanesian islands, between each island and each population from the 1000 Genomes Project, and between the Melanesian region as a whole 1000 Genomes African, East Asian, European, and South Asian regional groupings. Median-joining haplotype networks showing the relationship of MC1R haplotypes among Melanesian islands and between Melanesians and the 1000 Genomes samples were constructed using Network 4.613 [77].

Associations between the only common (frequency > 0.05) MC1R nonsynonymous polymorphism, rs2228479, and skin and hair pigmentation in the Melanesian population were tested for in PLINK [76] using linear regression with an additive model. We tested for associations in the full Melanesian sample using island as a covariate in an effort to control for inter-island substructure in the region [48]. We also tested for associations on each island separately. Due to the skewed distribution of the pigmentation measurements, skin and hair M index values were first transformed using a Box-Cox procedure (skin M λ = −0.788, hair M λ = 2.93). The distribution of untransformed and transformed skin and hair M index values are depicted in Additional files 1 and 2.

Results

MC1R sequence variation

In our sample of 188 sequenced Melanesians, we observed a total of five segregating sites: three of these were synonymous mutations, two were nonsynonymous. Of these five mutations, one (a nonsynonymous Ile → Leu mutation at position 89986456) is novel and has not been previously reported. However, this mutation is rare in the sample, occurring in three individuals (all from the island of New Hanover). The most common MC1R mutations observed here are rs2228479 (V92M), rs885479 (R163G), and rs2228478 (T314T), which occur at frequencies of 15.4, 4.5, and 22.3 % in the resequenced sample, respectively. MC1R haplotypes and their frequencies in the Melanesian sample are reported in Table 1.
Table 1

Melanesian MC1R haplotypes and total number of observed haplotypes for each island and linguistic phylum. Note—because some individuals could not be assigned to an island and/or phylum, the sum of the haplotypes for a given island/phylum may not equal the total number of observed haplotypes in the total Melanesian sample

 

rs22228479

Rs372929572

rs885479

Ile → Leu

rs2228478

Island

Languages

Total Melanesian

HAPLOTYPE #

89985940

89986083

89986154

89986456

89986608

Bougainville

New Hanover

New Britain

New Ireland

Austronesian

Papuan

 

1

G

C

A

A

A

0

5

6

6

16

1

17

2 (human consensus)

G

C

G

A

A

57

69

45

82

155

99

258

3

A

C

G

A

A

0

9

3

2

12

2

14

4

A

C

G

A

G

8

22

4

9

38

5

43

5

G

C

G

A

G

7

13

6

12

31

8

39

6

G

T

G

A

A

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

7

G

C

G

C

G

0

1

0

1

2

0

2

8

G

C

G

C

A

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

We calculated average nucleotide diversity (measured as π and θ) in the total Melanesian sample, as well as for each island and linguistic phylum separately. These are displayed in Table 2, with values for Africans, East Asians, Europeans, and South Asians sequenced by the 1000 Genomes Project included for comparison. π in the full Melanesian sample (0.00075) was lower than that observed for the AFR, EAS, and EUR regional samples. However, it was higher than the observed value for the SAS samples (0.00061). The Melanesian θ value (0.00081) was less than the reported value for all four 1000 Genomes population samples. Thinking that the lower diversity levels observed in the Melanesian sample might reflect the smaller sample size of the Melanesians (2 N = 376) compared to the larger regional 1000 Genome populations (2 N range: 370–758), we randomly subsampled all regional populations (MEL, AFR, EAS, EUR, and SAS) to obtain 370 haplotypes (the total number in the smallest, AFR, sample) from each and recalculated summary statistics. This process was repeated 100 times to obtain a range of π and θ values for each subsampled population (see Additional file 3: Table S1). As expected, subsampling leads to a reduction in diversity for for both π and θ in all five populations, with Melanesian diversity at both π and θ remaining low. Mean π is lower in the subsampled Melanesian sample than in the subsampled South Asian sample, and mean θ in the subsampled Melanesians is the lowest of all the subsampled population values.
Table 2

Summary statistics for MC1R in Melanesian sample and for 1000 Genomes populations (AFR = LWK, YRI; EUR = CEU, FIN, GBR, IBS, TSI; EAS = CHB, CHD, JPT; SAS = BEB, GIH, ITU, PJL, STU)

Population

2 N

bp

S

# of haplotypes

π

θ

Tajima’s D

FWH

Melanesia

376

954

5

8

0.00075

0.00081

−0.117

−0.543

Bougainville

72

954

2

3

0.00056

0.00043

0.486

−0.761

New Hanover

122

954

5

7

0.00099

0.00097

0.036

−0.191

New Britain

64

954

3

5

0.00067

0.00067

0.012

−0.850

New Ireland

112

954

4

6

0.00065

0.00079

−0.361

−0.715

Austronesian speaking

246

954

4

7

0.00087

0.00069

0.445

−0.362

Non-Austronesian speaking

124

954

3

5

0.00050

0.00058

−0.249

−0.934

AFR

370

954

10

13

0.00086

0.00162

−1.019

0.160

LWK

194

954

9

10

0.00082

0.00161

−1.12

0.123

YRI

176

954

7

9

0.00090

0.00128

−0.631

0.193

EUR

758

954

17

18

0.00104

0.00247

−1.338

−2.749

CEU

170

954

9

10

0.00101

0.00165

−0.902

−2.866

FIN

186

954

11

11

0.00107

0.00199

−1.109

−0.863

GBR

178

954

10

11

0.00122

0.00182

−0.778

−0.437

IBS

28

954

4

5

0.00054

0.00108

−1.30

−1.481

TSI

196

954

14

15

0.00087

0.00251

−1.65

−0.898

EAS

572

954

8

10

0.00138

0.00121

0.269

−0.802

CHB

194

954

6

6

0.00142

0.00108

0.657

−0.787

CHD

200

954

5

5

0.00157

0.00089

1.451

−0.285

JPT

178

954

6

8

0.00098

0.00109

−0.220

−1.697

SAS

978

954

23

24

0.00061

0.00323

−1.939

−2.662

BEB

172

954

7

8

0.00070

0.00128

−0.989

−0.611

GIH

206

954

13

14

0.00059

0.00231

−1.833

−0.635

ITU

204

954

12

13

0.00064

0.00213

−1.700

−2.672

PJL

192

954

10

11

0.00060

0.00180

−1.562

−0.677

STU

204

954

9

10

0.00056

0.00160

−1.479

−0.741

Mean levels of diversity and haplotype distribution across the four Melanesian islands sampled here can be found in Tables 1 and 2. Of the four islands, diversity is lowest on Bougainville (π = 0.00059, θ = 0.00043), where only two segregating sites and three haplotypes are present. Diversity levels are highest on New Hanover (π = 0.00099, θ = 0.00097), where the highest number segregating sites (five) and haplotypes (seven) are observed. Diversity values for each of the four Melanesian islands also indicate relatively low levels of variation compared to the individual 1000 Genomes populations. Notably π values in non-Austronesian speakers (π = 0.00050) are roughly one-half of those reported for Austronesian speakers (π = 0.00087), indicating a sharp reduction in diversity among non-Austronesians.

Evidence for purifying selection

Given the ten fixed nonsynonymous and six fixed synonymous changes between humans and chimpanzees, we estimate the likelihood of observing three nonsynonymous polymorphisms out of five total segregating sites to be 0.275. These data do not support a model in which variation in MC1R has been tightly constrained by strong purifying selection in Melanesian populations. Although site-frequency-spectrum based statistics such as Tajima’s D and Fay and Wu’s H are sensitive to demographic history, we also calculated values for these statistics in the full Melanesian sample, as well as for each individual Melanesian population (Table 2). Tajima’s D is slightly negative in the population samples from New Ireland and in non-Austronesian speakers, while it is slightly positive on the remaining islands and in Austronesian speakers Tajima’s D in the full Melanesian sample was −0.117. None of these values fall outside the 95 % confidence intervals of Tajima’s D values obtained from simulations under either the standard neutral (−1.412 – 1.696) or bottleneck model (−0.911 – 2.932). Fay and Wu’s H is slightly negative in all Melanesian populations sampled (−0.850 – -0.191). As with Tajima’s D, none of these values are outside the 95 % confidence limits estimated for either the standard neutral (−2.857 – 1.349) or bottleneck models (−2.986 – 1.014).

Inter-population variation

Among the four Melanesian islands sampled here, pairwise FST values at MC1R are generally low (0.000–0.042), with the highest values reported for comparisons between New Hanover and New Britain (0.042), and the lowest between New Ireland and Bougainville (0.000) and between New Ireland and New Britain (0.000). By comparison, pairwise FST values at MC1R among the five European, two African, three East Asian, and five South Asian populations in the 1000 Genomes Project ranged from 0.001–0.065 (European) 0.000 (African), 0.022–0.089 (East Asian), and 0.000–0.004 (South Asian) (see Additional file 3: Table S2). Among the eight MC1R haplotypes observed in the Melanesian sample, three of the five common haplotypes (haplotype frequency > 1 %) can be found on each of the 4 islands (Table 1, Fig. 2), also indicating relatively little regional substructure at MC1R.
Fig. 2

MC1R haplotype network of Melanesian samples, colored according to island (Bougainville: red; New Hanover: yellow; New Britain: green; New Ireland: blue; unaffiliated island: gray). Size of the each circle is proportional to the frequency of that haplotype. HCS: Human Consensus Sequence

Pairwise FST values between the full Melanesian sample and the 1000 Genomes AFR, EUR, EAS, and SAS regional population samples are found in Table 3. Surprisingly, Melanesians exhibit the lowest pairwise FST values with South Asians (FST(MEL-SAS) = 0.027) and the highest with East Asians (FST(MEL-EAS) = 0.270). However, this high divergence between Melanesians and East Asians is characteristic of generally high levels of divergence between East Asians and the other 3 populations at MC1R (FST values range between 0.255 and 0.326 for all East Asian-specific FST comparisons). There is no evidence of a particularly strong affinity between Melanesians and the high-UVR African populations of the 1000 Genomes Project (Table 3, Fig. 3). The majority of common (>1 %) Melanesian MC1R haplotypes are found in Melanesians as well as Africans, East Asians, Europeans, and South Asians Of the eight haplotypes observed in the Melanesian sample, none are shared exclusively with any of these groups (Fig. 3). When pairwise FST is calculated between each Melanesian island and the individual 1000 Genome populations there is little evidence to suggest particularly low levels of divergence between a specific island and any individual 1000 Genomes population (see Additional file 3: Table S2).
Table 3

Pairwse FST of MC1R between Melanesian and 1000 genomes regional populations

AFR

0.088

   

EUR

0.054

0.148

  

EAS

0.270

0.326

0.255

 

SAS

0.027

0.075

0.048

0.306

 

MEL

AFR

EUR

EAS

Fig. 3

MC1R haplotype network of Melanesian and 1000 Genomes samples. Melanesian haplotypes are colored according to island (Bougainville: red; New Hanover: yellow; New Britain: green; New Ireland: blue; unaffiliated island: purple) and 1000 Genomes haplotypes are shown in grayscale (African: light gray; East Asian: black; European: dark gray; South Asian: white). The size of the each circle is roughly proportional to the frequency of that haplotype. Numbers next to mutational branches refer to the base position in the MC1R coding sequence where the mutation occurs. Base position 515, the location of rs2228479 is highlighted in red

rs228479 frequency and associations with phenotype across Melanesia

The only common nonsynonymous SNP observed in the Melanesian sample was the rs2228479 polymorphism. To better assess the frequency of the derived allele at this site across Northern Island Melanesia we genotyped this allele in 444 additional individuals from New Britain, New Hanover, New Ireland, and Bougainville. The frequency of the derived allele at this locus in each Melanesian island and population are reported in Table 4. The frequency of the derived allele at rs2228479 was significantly different between New Hanover and the 3 other islands sampled (Chi-squared test, all p < 0.001). The frequency of the derived allele also varied significantly between the Austronesian speaking (0.19) and non-Austronesian speaking (0.10) population sample (χ 2 = 17.06, p < 0.0001).
Table 4

Raw mean (and S.D.) skin and hair M index values and frequency of rs2228479 derived allele in islands and neighborhoods sampled here

Island/Neighborhood

N

Mean skin M (SD)

Mean hair M

rs2228479 A allele frequency

Bougainville

78

89.8 (9.7)

147.6 (14.8)

0.10

Kukuavo

32

91.9 (8.5)

138.6 (8.9)

0.12

Saposa Island

16

82.6 (8.3)

150.1 (7.7)

0.16

New Britain

286

  

0.15

Arimegi Island

44

65.2 (5.3)

157.5 (11.1)

0.33

Kariai (Anem)

16

71.3 (4.3)

149.0 (8.8)

0.09

Pureling (Anem)

12

67.0 (6.9)

146.5 (12.2)

0.08

Kisiluvi (Mamousi)

29

68.8 (6.0)

155.0 (17.0)

0.05

Lingite (Mamousi)

13

69.3 (7.7)

164.4 (17.4)

0.04

“other” Mamousi

20

67.5 (4.6)

159.0 (15.7)

0.07

Loso (Nakanai)

10

70.9 (6.8)

164.3 (28.4)

0.05

Uasilau (Ata)

38

67.4 (5.3)

150.6 (15.1)

0.09

Lugei (Ata)

11

67.0 (5.6)

173.9 (21.1)

0.04

Bileki (Nakanai)

18

66.7 (6.3)

143.3 (15.4)

0.19

Ubili (Nakanai)

27

67.6 (6.5)

166.1 (20.1)

0.19

New Ireland

147

73.9 (8.4)

151.5 (22.4)

0.17

Tigak

25

72.9 (8.6)

156.0 (16.5)

0.32

Nailik

19

72.8 (6.7)

151.1 (25.1)

0.21

Kabil (Kuot)

32

76.1 (8.3)

151.1 (17.0)

0.13

Notsi

16

74.1 (9.9)

161.1 (21.2)

0.09

Madak

23

77.0 (8.3)

145.6 (28.3)

0.07

New Hanover

84

76.7 (7.4)

154.5 (16.2)

0.26

North Lavongai

62

76.7 (6.9)

155.2 (16.3)

0.30

South Lavongai

13

77.3 (9.9)

150.3 (14.2)

0.15

Populations in boldface type speak non-Austronesian languages

We tested for an association between genotype at rs2228479 and quantitatively measured skin and hair color using this expanded sample. Mean skin and hair values (standardized and normalized as well as raw values) are found in Table 4. Because the observed rs2228479 genotypes differed significantly from expectations under Hardy Weinberg equilibrium in the full Northern Island Melanesian sample (p = 3.494 × 10−5), possibly indicating significant population substructure, and because of previous reports of substructure in the region [48], we tested for associations in the full sample using island as a covariate as well as on each island separately. In the full sample rs2228479 is not significantly associated with variation in hair pigmentation (p = 0.7201). Associations with skin pigmentation are suggestive (0.0635), but not significant. These should also be interpreted with caution, since this analysis does not account for potential substructure within island groupings [48]. rs2228479 is not significantly associated with lighter skin color on any of the four islands tested, nor is it significantly associated with hair color (p > 0.05 for all tests).

Discussion

The populations sampled here are all from Northern Island Melanesia, a region where UVR is high and variation in skin phenotype and at pigmentation loci is expected to be constrained by purifying selection. While pigmentation is generally dark, notable variation in both skin and hair pigmentation is observed [58], indicating the likely presence of coding or regulatory mutations in pigmentation genes. Recently an allele associated with lighter hair color in populations from the Solomon Islands was identified [59], the distribution of which is restricted to the Solomons and parts of the Bismarck Archipelago [59, 78]. This suggests that at least some of the observed variation in skin and hair phenotype in the region may be caused by population-specific alleles not currently reported in large public databases. In this paper, we set out to characterize variation in a well-known pigmentation candidate gene, MC1R, in a large sample of individuals from Northern Island Melanesia in order to test the following hypotheses: a) that MC1R variation is constrained by purifying selection in Melanesia, as it is in other high UVR populations; b) that, given this selective constraint, Melanesians should appear more closely related to other high-UVR populations (e.g., Africans) than to populations with which they share a more recent common history (other non-Africans, and specifically East Asians), and c) that nonsynonymous variants in MC1R are significantly associated with skin and/or hair pigmentation phenotype in Melanesian populations.

Purifying selection

Given the high levels of UVR in Melanesia, we expected that variation in MC1R would be constrained in Melanesian populations, particularly in non-Austronesian speakers, as the ancestors of modern non-Austronesian speakers have been resident in the region for ~ 30 kya. Surprisingly, out of the five segregating sites that we observed in this Melanesian sample, three are nonsynonymous polymorphisms. One of these is rare (occurring at a frequency of < 1 % in the sample), while the two others, rs2228479 and rs885479, occur at frequencies of 15.4 and 4.5 % in the sequenced sample. A modified McDonald’s Kreitman’s test (suitable for tests involving a small number of segregating sites) does not support a model of purifying selection. Tajima’s D and Fay and Wu’s H values, while slightly negative, also do not indicate a significant departure from neutrality, suggesting that MC1R in Melanesians has not been subject to either purifying or positive selection. This absence of strong purifying selection is surprising given the high UVR levels in the region [58]. However, while we find little evidence to support strong purifying selection acting on MC1R in this Melanesian population sample it is likely that purifying selection has influenced variation at other pigmentation loci.

Interestingly, when we apply this modified McDonald-Kreitman’s test to the African 1000 Genomes data we also fail to reject a model of neutrality. Ten segregating sites are observed among the LWK and YRI samples, 4 of which are nonsynonymous and 6 of which are synonymous. The likelihood of observing such a pattern is p = 0.553. This differs from observations of Harding et al. [42], who observed only five MC1R haplotypes in Africans, and zero nonsynonymous polymorphisms. Using those data, the authors estimated that the probability of observing zero nonsynonymous polymorphisms out of five total polymorphisms was 0.0198, causing them to reject a model of neutral evolution in Africans. Similarly low levels of variation were observed in Africans by Rana et al. [43]. However, a subsequent study by John et al. [44] reported the presence of three nonsynonymous polymorphisms in Africans, including one (rs3212366) that occurred at a frequency of 0.11. Despite the presence of these nonsynonymous polymorphisms, however, a McDonald-Kreitman’s test indicated that variation in these African samples was constrained by purifying selection. However, an HKA test failed to reject the neutral model, and while site-frequency-spectrum based tests (e.g. Tajima’s D, Fay and Wu’s H) indicated a significant departure from neutrality, the authors noted that this could be confounded by demographic history [44]. These results demonstrate that nonsynonymous polymorphisms are present (and tolerated) in African populations (and presumably other high UVR populations. The 1000 Genome data set used here is roughly seven times the size of the dataset used in these earlier studies, which may explain the higher proportion of polymorphisms (both nonsynonymous and synonymous) that we observe. Notably, though, none of these reach a frequency greater than 0.025 in the African sample (frequency range is 0.005–0.022). This is in contrast to the nonsynonymous polymorphisms observed in the Melanesian sample, which range in frequency from 0.003 to 0.157.

Inter-population variation

Melanesia is a region known for its extensive diversity, often characterized by high levels of inter-island phenotypic and genotypic variation [48, 57, 78, 79]. This variation can be attributed, at least in part, to the complex population history of the region [4751]. Given these background levels of high inter-island diversity, as well as known differences in skin and hair pigmentation across islands in the region, one might expect to observe high levels of inter-island divergence at MC1R. However, levels of pairwise FST between islands are relatively low (0.000–0.031) suggesting that MC1R is not significantly differentiated among islands. This is also visualized in the Melanesian MC1R haplotype networks (Fig. 2), which indicate that the majority of common Melanesian MC1R haplotypes are shared across islands.

Constraint on pigmentation phenotype is expected to lead to lower levels of inter-population divergence at pigmentation loci between high UVR populations. In our dataset this could be visualized as reduced population differentiation (measured as FST) and high levels of haplotype sharing between Melanesian and African populations. Here we observe an FST value of 0.088 between our sequenced Melanesian sample and the African populations (LWK and YRI) of the 1000 Genomes Project. Without comparisons to FST values for other genes sequenced in the same population samples it is difficult to assess whether this is unusually high or low compared to average levels of divergence between these specific populations. However, previous studies have reported the mean FST between a single Melanesian (Nasioi) and African (Mende) population to be 0.182, based on allele frequencies at ~11,000 SNPs distributed throughout the genome [11]. Other published estimates based on sequence data from non-coding autosomal regions indicate that Melanesian-African FST values range from 0.199–0.283 [80]. These suggest that while still high, the reported FST values here between Melanesians and Africans may be lower than average levels of genome-wide divergence between populations from these two regions. However, if MC1R function were highly conserved across high-UVR populations we would expect to observe much lower values, as well as a high degree of exclusive Melanesian-African haplotype sharing, which is not evident (see Fig. 3).

The phenotypic role and evolutionary history of rs2228479

The derived rs2228479 allele is associated with red hair and fair skin color in European populations [36], and has been associated with lighter skin color in South Asians [13] and freckling and solar letinges in a Japanese population [61, 62]. rs2228479 also has a significant gene-gene interaction effect with the OCA2 locus that may influence pigmentation in Tibetan populations [1]. When we typed this SNP (the only nonsynonymous mutation to reach a frequency > 5 % in our sequenced sample) in an expanded sample from across Northern Island Melanesia (total rs2228479 sample size = 635 individuals) we observe the derived allele occurring at a frequency of 16.1 % in the region. In comparison, this allele occurs at a frequency of 11-33 % in the East Asian 1000 Genomes populations, although it is generally rare in the European, African, and South Asian samples (0–12 %).

Previous studies have demonstrated that this allele results in impaired MC1R function relative to the human consensus sequence [81], consistent with reported associations with pigmentation phenotype. However, we find no association between rs2228479 and skin or hair color in the full sample or on any of the individual four islands that make up the bulk of the Melanesian sample used here. We have tested for associations on each island separately to avoid confounding effects of population substructure across the region (which can lead to false-positive associations). However, this results in smaller sample sizes and a loss of power to detect associations. A more robust method to control for population substructure in the larger region would be to would be to utilize genotype data from a large number of markers across the genome and conduct a PCA analyses to identify potential substructure [82, 83]. Significant PCs can then be included as covariates in association analyses.

A second possible explanation for this lack of association is that the effects of the rs2228479 are modified by epistatic interactions with other pigmentation loci [84]. This might explain the moderate frequencies of the derived rs2228479 allele in our Melanesian sample: despite the reduction in MC1R function caused by this allele, its effects are masked by other pigmentation loci and it is treated as effectively neutral. These results also indicate that polymorphisms at loci other than MC1R are necessary to explain the observed variation in Melanesian skin and hair pigmentation. One locus known to influence hair pigmentation in the region, rs387907171 SNP in the TYRP1 gene [59], can explain a small proportion of hair pigmentation on these islands [78], but other, yet-to-be-identified loci also clearly play a role in shaping Melanesian pigmentation phenotype.

While epistatic effects between MC1R and other pigmentation loci may partially explain the frequency of the derived rs2228479 allele observed here, the demographic history of Melanesian populations may also be a contributing factor. In particular, we note the differences in the frequency of the derived rs2228479 allele between Austronesian and non-Austronesian speakers, and suggest that this allele may have been introduced to the region via Austronesian-mediated migration. Supporting this, some of the highest reported frequencies of this allele are found in East Asia, specifically in aboriginal populations from Taiwan, the putative Austronesian homeland [85], As further evidence, we note the distribution of the derived allele in Indonesian populations to the west, where it is absent from multiple non-Austronesian speaking populations, but is observed at a frequency of 0.27 in the Austronesian-speaking Biak islanders. Also relevant are the sharply decreased diversity levels of nucleotide diversity observed among the non-Austronesian individuals in our sample, which suggest that non-Austronesian MC1R diversity may reflect a history of long-term constraint, while the higher diversity among Austronesian speakers is indicative of a recent history outside of the region. However, most phenotypic and genetic studies indicate that sufficient admixture between the later arriving Austronesians and the descendants of the earliest inhabitants of the region has occurred to blur clear-cut distinctions between Austronesian and non-Austronesian speakers [47, 48, 58, 78, 86], and we caution against interpreting patterns of MC1R diversity in this sample strictly along linguistic lines. Consistent with the picture of long-term admixture, we note that haplotypes carrying the derived rs2228479 allele are observed on all islands, and in both Austronesian and non-Austronesian-speaking individuals.

Conclusion

In this study we sequenced the MC1R gene in a large sample (n = 188) of individuals from four islands in Northern Island Melanesia, and find little indication of strong purifying selection acting on this gene. We also find little evidence of high levels of inter-island diversity in the region, contrary to other loci [48]. While FST values between our Melanesian sample and African populations sequenced in the 1000 Genomes Project indicate lower than average levels of divergence, we do not find strong evidence that ancestral MC1R haplotypes have been conserved in populations from these two high UVR regions. The only common nonsynonymous MC1R mutation observed in the Melanesian sample, rs2228479, is not associated with pigmentation phenotype in the region, possibly due to epistatic effects at other loci. These epistatic effects along with recent migrations of East Asian individuals via the Austronesian expansion can explain the observed patterns of MC1R diversity across the region. Pigmentation is a complex phenotype that exhibits extensive variation within and between populations, and is controlled by multiple interacting genetic loci. While MC1R has a strong influence on pigmentation in several non-African populations, it does not play a significant role in shaping variation in populations from Northern Island Melanesia. Clearly a better understanding of pigmentation candidate gene diversity in Melanesian populations will be necessary in order to better characterize the genetic architecture of the pigmentation phenotype in this region.

Availability of supporting data

The DNA sequences supporting the material analyzed here are available in the GenBank repository, with accession numbers KT863240- KT863426.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the people of Papua New Guinea for their enthusiastic participation in this work. This work was supported by the University of Cincinnati.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, 481 Braunstein Hall
(2)
Department of Anthropology, 101 West Hall, University of Michigan
(3)
Department of Anthropology, Temple University

References

  1. Akey JM, Wang H, Xiong M, Wu H, Liu W, Shriver MD, et al. Interaction between the melanocortin-1 receptor and P genes contributes to inter-individual variation in skin pigmentation phenotypes in a Tibetan population. Hum Genet. 2001;108(6):516–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang KC, Ngu MS, Reid KP, Teh MS, Aida ZS, Koh DX, et al. Skin color variation in Orang Asli tribes of Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42752.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu Mallick C, Iliescu FM, Mols M, Hill S, Tamang R, Chaubey G, et al. The light skin allele of SLC24A5 in South Asians and Europeans shares identity by descent. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(11), e1003912.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beleza S, Johnson NA, Candille SI, Absher DM, Coram MA, Lopes J, et al. Genetic architecture of skin and eye color in an African-European admixed population. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(3), e1003372.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonilla C, Boxill LA, Donald SA, Williams T, Sylvester N, Parra EJ, et al. The 8818G allele of the agouti signaling protein (ASIP) gene is ancestral and is associated with darker skin color in African Americans. Hum Genet. 2005;116(5):402–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards M, Bigham A, Tan J, Li S, Gozdzik A, Ross K, et al. Association of the OCA2 polymorphism His615Arg with melanin content in east Asian populations: further evidence of convergent evolution of skin pigmentation. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(3), e1000867.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Flanagan N, Healy E, Ray A, Philips S, Todd C, Jackson IJ, et al. Pleiotropic effects of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene on human pigmentation. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(17):2531–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Guenther CA, Tasic B, Luo L, Bedell MA, Kingsley DM. A molecular basis for classic blond hair color in Europeans. Nat Genet. 2014;46(7):748–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamason RL, Mohideen MA, Mest JR, Wong AC, Norton HL, Aros MC, et al. SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science. 2005;310(5755):1782–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Myles S, Somel M, Tang K, Kelso J, Stoneking M. Identifying genes underlying skin pigmentation differences among human populations. Hum Genet. 2007;120(5):613–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Norton HL, Kittles RA, Parra E, McKeigue P, Mao X, Cheng K, et al. Genetic evidence for the convergent evolution of light skin in Europeans and East Asians. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(3):710–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shriver MD, Parra EJ, Dios S, Bonilla C, Norton H, Jovel C, et al. Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping. Hum Genet. 2003;112(4):387–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stokowski RP, Pant PV, Dadd T, Fereday A, Hinds DA, Jarman C, et al. A genomewide association study of skin pigmentation in a South Asian population. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(6):1119–32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Valenzuela RK, Henderson MS, Walsh MH, Garrison NA, Kelch JT, Cohen-Barak O, et al. Predicting phenotype from genotype: normal pigmentation. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(2):315–22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. The evolution of human skin coloration. J Hum Evol. 2000;39(1):57–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. Colloquium paper: human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107 Suppl 2:8962–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Relethford JH. Hemispheric difference in human skin color. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997;104(4):449–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogers A, Iltis D, Wooding S. Genetic variation at the MC1R locus and the time since loss of human body hair. Curr Anthropol. 2004;45(1):105–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Branda RF, Eaton JW. Skin color and nutrient photolysis: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science. 1978;201(4356):625–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Robbins A. Biological perspectives on human pigmentation. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Loomis WF. Skin-pigment regulation of vitamin-D biosynthesis in man. Science. 1967;157(3788):501–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaidbey KH, Agin PP, Sayre RM, Kligman AM. Photoprotection by melanin--a comparison of black and Caucasian skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1979;1(3):249–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Brenner M, Hearing VJ. The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84(3):539–49.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sage E. Distribution and repair of photolesions in DNA: genetic consequences and the role of sequence context. Photochem Photobiol. 1993;57(1):163–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tadokoro T, Kobayashi N, Zmudzka BZ, Ito S, Wakamatsu K, Yamaguchi Y, et al. UV-induced DNA damage and melanin content in human skin differing in racial/ethnic origin. FASEB J. 2003;17(9):1177–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vink AA, Roza L. Biological consequences of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001;65(2–3):101–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Blum HF. Does the melanin pigment of human skin have adaptive value? An essay in human skin have adaptive value? An essay in human ecology and the evolution of race. Q Rev Biol. 1961;36:50–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. Skin cancer was not a potent selective force in the evolution of protective pigmentation in early hominins. Proc Biol Sci Royal Soc. 2014;281(1789):20140517.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Fenech M. Folate (vitamin B9) and vitamin B12 and their function in the maintenance of nuclear and mitochondrial genome integrity. Mutat Res. 2012;733(1–2):21–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathur U, Datta SL, Mathur BB. The effect of aminopterin-induced folic acid deficiency on spermatogenesis. Fertil Steril. 1977;28(12):1356–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucock M, Daskalakis I, Briggs D, Yates Z, Levene M. Altered folate metabolism and disposition in mothers affected by a spina bifida pregnancy: influence of 677c -- > t methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and 2756a -- > g methionine synthase genotypes. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;70(1):27–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Off MK, Steindal AE, Porojnicu AC, Juzeniene A, Vorobey A, Johnsson A, et al. Ultraviolet photodegradation of folic acid. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2005;80(1):47–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jablonski NG. The evolution of human skin and skin color. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2004;33:585–623.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Slominski A, Tobin DJ, Shibahara S, Wortsman J. Melanin pigmentation in mammalian skin and its hormonal regulation, vol. 84. 2004.Google Scholar
  35. Abdel-Malek Z, Swope VB, Suzuki I, Akcali C, Harriger MD, Boyce ST, et al. Mitogenic and melanogenic stimulation of normal human melanocytes by melanotropic peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(5):1789–93.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Valverde P, Healy E, Jackson I, Rees JL, Thody AJ. Variants of the melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor gene are associated with red hair and fair skin in humans. Nat Genet. 1995;11(3):328–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinez-Cadenas C, Lopez S, Ribas G, Flores C, Garcia O, Sevilla A, et al. Simultaneous purifying selection on the ancestral MC1R allele and positive selection on the melanoma-risk allele V60L in south Europeans. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2654–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Box NF, Wyeth JR, O’Gorman LE, Martin NG, Sturm RA. Characterization of melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor variant alleles in twins with red hair. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(11):1891–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rees JL. The genetics of sun sensitivity in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(5):739–51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kadekaro AL, Kavanagh R, Kanto H, Terzieva S, Hauser J, Kobayashi N, et al. alpha-Melanocortin and endothelin-1 activate antiapoptotic pathways and reduce DNA damage in human melanocytes. Cancer Res. 2005;65(10):4292–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Song X, Mosby N, Yang J, Xu A, Abdel-Malek Z, Kadekaro AL. α-MSH activates immediate defense responses to UV-induced oxidative stress in human melanocytes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2009;22(6):809–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Harding RM, Healy E, Ray AJ, Ellis NS, Flanagan N, Todd C, et al. Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(4):1351–61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rana BK, Hewett-Emmett D, Jin L, Chang BH, Sambuughin N, Lin M, et al. High polymorphism at the human melanocortin 1 receptor locus. Genetics. 1999;151(4):1547–57.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. John PR, Makova K, Li WH, Jenkins T, Ramsay M. DNA polymorphism and selection at the melanocortin-1 receptor gene in normally pigmented southern African individuals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;994:299–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Harris EE, Meyer D. The molecular signature of selection underlying human adaptations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;Suppl 43:89–130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hider JL, Gittelman RM, Shah T, Edwards M, Rosenbloom A, Akey JM, et al. Exploring signatures of positive selection in pigmentation candidate genes in populations of East Asian ancestry. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:150.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Delfin F, Myles S, Choi Y, Hughes D, Illek R, van Oven M, et al. Bridging near and remote Oceania: mtDNA and NRY variation in the Solomon Islands. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(2):545–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Friedlaender JS, Friedlaender FR, Reed FA, Kidd KK, Kidd JR, Chambers GK, et al. The genetic structure of Pacific Islanders. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(1):e19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Friedlaender JS, Gentz F, Green K, Merriwether DA. A cautionary tale on ancient migration detection: mitochondrial DNA variation in Santa Cruz Islands, Solomon Islands. Hum Biol. 2002;74(3):453–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindström E, Terrill A, Reesnick G, Dunn M. The languages of island Melanesia. In: Friedlaender J, editor. Genes, language, and culture history in the Southwest Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 118–39.Google Scholar
  51. Summerhayes G. Island Melanesian pasts: a view from archaeology. In: Friedlaender JS, editor. Genes, language, and culture history in the Southwest Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 10–35.Google Scholar
  52. Groube L, Chappell J, Muke J, Price D. A 40,000 year-old human occupation site at Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. Nature. 1986;324(6096):453–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Summerhayes GR, Leavesley M, Fairbairn A, Mandui H, Field J, Ford A, et al. Human adaptation and plant use in highland New Guinea 49,000 to 44,000 years ago. Science. 2010;330(6000):78–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wickler S, Spriggs M. Pleistocene human occupation of the Solomon Islands, Melanesia. Antiquity. 1988;62:703–6.Google Scholar
  55. Bellwood P, Dizon E. The batanes archaeological project and the “Out of Taiwan” hypothesis for austronesian dispersal. J Austronesian Stud. 2005;1:1–31.Google Scholar
  56. Kirch P. Peopling of the pacific: a holistic anthropological perspective. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2010;39:131–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Norton H, Koki G, Friedlaender J. Pigmentation and candidate gene variation in Northern Island Melanesia. In: Population genetics, linguistics, and culture history in the southwest pacific: a synthesis. 2007. p. 96–112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Norton HL, Friedlaender JS, Merriwether DA, Koki G, Mgone CS, Shriver MD. Skin and hair pigmentation variation in Island Melanesia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;130(2):254–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kenny EE, Timpson NJ, Sikora M, Yee MC, Moreno-Estrada A, Eng C, et al. Melanesian blond hair is caused by an amino acid change in TYRP1. Science. 2012;336(6081):554.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Chaplin G. Geographic distribution of environmental factors influencing human skin coloration. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004;125(3):292–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Motokawa T, Kato T, Hashimoto Y, Katagiri T. Effect of Val92Met and Arg163Gln variants of the MC1R gene on freckles and solar lentigines in Japanese. Pigment Cell Res. 2007;20(2):140–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamaguchi K, Watanabe C, Kawaguchi A, Sato T, Naka I, Shindo M, et al. Association of melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) polymorphisms with skin reflectance and freckles in Japanese. J Hum Genet. 2012;57(11):700–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Diffey BL, Farr PM, Ive FA. The establishment and clinical value of a dermatological photobiology service in a district general hospital. Br J Dermatol. 1984;110(2):187–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68(4):978–89.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Norton H, Koki G, Friedlaender J. Pigmentation and candidate gene variation in Northern Island Melanesia. In: Friedlaender J, editor. Genes, language, and culture history in the Southwest Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 96–112.Google Scholar
  67. Rozas J. DNA sequence polymorphism analysis using DnaSP. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;537:337–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Nei M, Li WH. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76(10):5269–73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Watterson GA. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975;7(2):256–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123(3):585–95.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Wollstein A, Lao O, Becker C, Brauer S, Trent RJ, Nurnberg P, et al. Demographic history of Oceania inferred from genome-wide data. Curr Biol. 2010;20(22):1983–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. McDonald JH, Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991;351(6328):652–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Nielsen R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:197–218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Nielsen R. Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics. Heredity (Edinb). 2001;86(Pt 6):641–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16(1):37–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Norton HL, Correa EA, Koki G, Friedlaender JS. Distribution of an allele associated with blond hair color across Northern Island Melanesia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014;153(4):653–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Scheinfeldt L, Friedlaender F, Friedlaender J, Latham K, Koki G, Karafet T, et al. Unexpected NRY chromosome variation in Northern Island Melanesia. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(8):1628–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Wall JD, Cox MP, Mendez FL, Woerner A, Severson T, Hammer MF. A novel DNA sequence database for analyzing human demographic history. Genome Res. 2008;18(8):1354–61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Xu X, Thornwall M, Lundin LG, Chhajlani V. Val92Met variant of the melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor gene. Nat Genet. 1996;14(4):384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(12), e190.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):904–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Pospiech E, Wojas-Pelc A, Walsh S, Liu F, Maeda H, Ishikawa T, et al. The common occurrence of epistasis in the determination of human pigmentation and its impact on DNA-based pigmentation phenotype prediction. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;11:64–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Ding Q, Hu Y, Xu S, Wang CC, Li H, Zhang R, et al. Neanderthal origin of the haplotypes carrying the functional variant Val92Met in the MC1R in modern humans. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(8):1994–2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Duggan AT, Evans B, Friedlaender FR, Friedlaender JS, Koki G, Merriwether DA, et al. Maternal history of Oceania from complete mtDNA genomes: contrasting ancient diversity with recent homogenization due to the Austronesian expansion. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94(5):721–33.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Norton et al. 2015

Advertisement