Skip to main content

Table 1 Lignin content and saccharification rate in 37 tomato introgression lines

From: Exploring tomato Solanum pennellii introgression lines for residual biomass and enzymatic digestibility traits

Introgression lines Lignin content g 100 g−1 dry weight Saccharification rate mg glucose g−1 biomass h−1
IL 1–1 10.5 ± 2.0 l   1.8 ± 0.4 il
IL 1–3 16.1 ± 1.3 ai   8.6 ± 0.2 ce
IL 1–4 15.5 ± 0.7 al   7.2 ± 0.7 dg
IL 2–1 13.4 ± 0.9 dl   5.9 ± 1.2 eg
IL 2–2 16.2 ± 0.7 ah   8.0 ± 1.0 cg
IL 2–5 12.0 ± 2.2 gl   2.7 ± 0.2 in
IL 2–6 21.5 ± 3.9 a 11.2 ± 2.6 ad
IL 3–1 15.1 ± 1.2 al   9.5 ± 0.8 kg
IL 3–2 10.6 ± 0.6 il   1.6 ± 0.3 l
IL 3–3 17.8 ± 0.5 ae 10.4 ± 1.4 ad
IL 3–4 16.4 ± 1.8 ai 13.4 ± 1.5 a
IL 3–5 13.1 ± 2.1 dl   5.6 ± 0.4 eh
IL 4–1 14.3 ± 3.7 cl   2.2 ± 0.6 in
IL 4–3 16.2 ± 1.6 ah 11.9 ± 2.3 ac
IL 4–4 14.6 ± 2.9 bl   5.9 ± 1.3 eg
IL 5–1 17.8 ± 1.4 ad   9.4 ± 1.6 bd
IL 5–2 12.3 ± 0.2 fl   2.5 ± 0.3 hl
IL 5–3 14.2 ± 3.3 cl   8.1 ± 0.6 cf
IL 6–1 12.9 ± 1.9 dl   5.8 ± 1.0 eg
IL 6–2 20.5 ± 2.1 a   7.7 ± 2.0 kg
IL 6–3 13.9 ± 0.4 cl   8.0 ± 2.3 ch
IL 7–1 14.9 ± 2.7 bl   5.2 ± 1.4 fh
IL 7–2 16.9 ± 4.3 ag   9.0 ± 1.0 ag
IL 7–4 16.1 ± 1.8 ai   4.7 ± 0.8 gi
IL 8–1 14.2 ± 1.8 cl 10.8 ± 0.4 ac
IL 8–2 18.4 ± 1.2 ad 12.0 ± 1.6 ab
IL 8–3 10.5 ± 1.4 l   1.3 ± 0.3 l
IL 9–1 13.2 ± 0.4 dl 10.2 ± 2.1 ad
IL 9–2 14.7 ± 2.7 bl   5.5 ± 2.0 eh
IL 9–3 10.8 ± 2.4 hl   8.2 ± 0.8 bh
IL 10–1 16.8 ± 1.4 ag   8.0 ± 1.6 cg
IL 10–2 14.5 ± 3.6 cl 10.3 ± 1.1 ae
IL 10–3 12.5 ± 1.7 el   2.0 ± 0.3 in
IL 11–1 16.8 ± 2.7 ag 10.6 ± 1.3 ac
IL 11–2 20.1 ± 3.6 ab   9.3 ± 0.3 bd
IL 11–3 20.0 ± 2.5 ab   8.5 ± 0.4 bh
IL 12–4 15.5 ± 4.3 al   7.5 ± 0.5 kg
M82 (control) 17.6 ± 2.7 af 12.0 ± 3.0 ab
  1. Within each column, means followed by different letters are significantly
  2. different according to the Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05