Skip to main content

Table 1 Lignin content and saccharification rate in 37 tomato introgression lines

From: Exploring tomato Solanum pennellii introgression lines for residual biomass and enzymatic digestibility traits

Introgression lines

Lignin content g 100 g−1 dry weight

Saccharification rate mg glucose g−1 biomass h−1

IL 1–1

10.5 ± 2.0

l

  1.8 ± 0.4

il

IL 1–3

16.1 ± 1.3

ai

  8.6 ± 0.2

ce

IL 1–4

15.5 ± 0.7

al

  7.2 ± 0.7

dg

IL 2–1

13.4 ± 0.9

dl

  5.9 ± 1.2

eg

IL 2–2

16.2 ± 0.7

ah

  8.0 ± 1.0

cg

IL 2–5

12.0 ± 2.2

gl

  2.7 ± 0.2

in

IL 2–6

21.5 ± 3.9

a

11.2 ± 2.6

ad

IL 3–1

15.1 ± 1.2

al

  9.5 ± 0.8

kg

IL 3–2

10.6 ± 0.6

il

  1.6 ± 0.3

l

IL 3–3

17.8 ± 0.5

ae

10.4 ± 1.4

ad

IL 3–4

16.4 ± 1.8

ai

13.4 ± 1.5

a

IL 3–5

13.1 ± 2.1

dl

  5.6 ± 0.4

eh

IL 4–1

14.3 ± 3.7

cl

  2.2 ± 0.6

in

IL 4–3

16.2 ± 1.6

ah

11.9 ± 2.3

ac

IL 4–4

14.6 ± 2.9

bl

  5.9 ± 1.3

eg

IL 5–1

17.8 ± 1.4

ad

  9.4 ± 1.6

bd

IL 5–2

12.3 ± 0.2

fl

  2.5 ± 0.3

hl

IL 5–3

14.2 ± 3.3

cl

  8.1 ± 0.6

cf

IL 6–1

12.9 ± 1.9

dl

  5.8 ± 1.0

eg

IL 6–2

20.5 ± 2.1

a

  7.7 ± 2.0

kg

IL 6–3

13.9 ± 0.4

cl

  8.0 ± 2.3

ch

IL 7–1

14.9 ± 2.7

bl

  5.2 ± 1.4

fh

IL 7–2

16.9 ± 4.3

ag

  9.0 ± 1.0

ag

IL 7–4

16.1 ± 1.8

ai

  4.7 ± 0.8

gi

IL 8–1

14.2 ± 1.8

cl

10.8 ± 0.4

ac

IL 8–2

18.4 ± 1.2

ad

12.0 ± 1.6

ab

IL 8–3

10.5 ± 1.4

l

  1.3 ± 0.3

l

IL 9–1

13.2 ± 0.4

dl

10.2 ± 2.1

ad

IL 9–2

14.7 ± 2.7

bl

  5.5 ± 2.0

eh

IL 9–3

10.8 ± 2.4

hl

  8.2 ± 0.8

bh

IL 10–1

16.8 ± 1.4

ag

  8.0 ± 1.6

cg

IL 10–2

14.5 ± 3.6

cl

10.3 ± 1.1

ae

IL 10–3

12.5 ± 1.7

el

  2.0 ± 0.3

in

IL 11–1

16.8 ± 2.7

ag

10.6 ± 1.3

ac

IL 11–2

20.1 ± 3.6

ab

  9.3 ± 0.3

bd

IL 11–3

20.0 ± 2.5

ab

  8.5 ± 0.4

bh

IL 12–4

15.5 ± 4.3

al

  7.5 ± 0.5

kg

M82 (control)

17.6 ± 2.7

af

12.0 ± 3.0

ab

  1. Within each column, means followed by different letters are significantly
  2. different according to the Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05