Skip to main content

Table 3 Empirical size (in percentage (%)) of GDTI, MCGDTI, MCGDT-ME, GDT-ME, GDT and MCPDTIa

From: Generalized disequilibrium test for association in qualitative traits incorporating imprinting effects based on extended pedigrees

Setting

Complete data

Incomplete data

 

GDTI

MCGDTIT

MCGDTIE

MCGDT-MET

MCGDT-MEE

GDT-ME

GDT

MCPDTIT

MCPDTIE

Based on 90 pedigrees

 1

0.98

1.04

1.10

0.95

0.99

0.82

0.85

0.80

0.84

 2

1.14

1.12

1.14

1.12

1.06

0.82

0.87

0.66

0.74

 3

0.99

1.05

0.99

0.91

0.94

0.80

0.87

0.81

0.86

 4

0.85

0.97

1.05

0.98

0.91

0.74

0.90

0.91

0.91

 5

0.96

1.11

1.11

0.96

0.88

0.87

1.03

0.73

0.81

 6

1.11

1.13

1.14

0.84

0.81

0.98

1.05

0.90

0.89

 7

1.13

0.85

0.96

0.96

0.88

0.70

0.82

0.94

1.05

 8

1.09

1.11

1.13

0.86

0.86

0.72

0.76

0.83

0.86

 9

1.11

1.14

1.13

1.05

1.12

0.82

0.89

1.04

1.00

Based on 150 pedigrees

 1

1.00

0.93

0.94

0.94

0.93

0.93

0.95

0.90

0.98

 2

1.10

1.05

1.04

0.98

0.98

0.98

1.09

0.88

0.93

 3

1.05

1.09

1.10

0.97

0.99

1.04

1.04

0.89

0.92

 4

0.97

 

0.95

0.96

0.81

0.83

0.87

0.89

0.99

1.13

 5

1.13

 

1.19

1.17

1.01

0.93

0.90

1.05

0.92

0.93

 6

1.15

 

1.15

1.14

0.98

0.95

0.82

0.83

0.98

1.07

 7

1.06

 

0.98

1.02

1.05

1.04

0.85

0.86

1.02

1.03

 8

0.97

 

0.93

0.93

0.95

0.99

0.76

0.92

0.95

0.96

 9

1.07

 

1.02

1.01

0.86

0.85

0.93

1.09

1.05

1.03

  1. aThe simulations are conducted under the null hypothesis of no association and no imprinting based on 10,000 replicates for 90 and 150 pedigrees at 1% significance level, respectively