Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimates (± standard error) of heritability (highlighted in grey, on the diagonal), genetic correlations (above diagonal) and phenotypic correlations (below diagonal) for all the traits measured

From: Quantifying the genetic parameters of feed efficiency in juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus

Growth traits and feed intake

Feed efficiency traits

Trait1

BWi

BWf

TGCLOSS

TGCCOMP

BWG

TGCFI

FI

FCR

RFI

Growth traits and feed intake

 BWi

0.65 ± 0.11

0.99 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.26

ne

0.86 ± 0.08

0.33 ± 0.26

0.77 ± 0.08

0.11 ± 0.21

0.01 ± 0.18

 BWf

0.95

0.60 ± 0.11

− 0.01 ± 0.25

ne

0.93 ± 0.04

0.47 ± 0.21

0.77 ± 0.08

0.08 ± 0.22

0.07 ± 0.19

 TGCLOSS

0.03

0.02

0.23 ± 0.12

0.15 ± 0.29

− 0.18 ± 0.29

− 0.46 ± 0.41

0.46 ± 0.24

0.80 ± 0.25

0.70 ± 0.22

 TGCCOMP

0.80

0.80

0.07

0.22 ± 0.06

0.70 ± 0.17

0.73 ± 0.26

0.55 ± 0.15

0.18 ± 0.22

0.19 ± 0.23

 WG

0.63

0.85

−0.02

0.64

0.27 ± 0.08

0.75 ± 0.14

0.62 ± 0.13

−0.07 ± 0.24

−0.14 ± 0.22

 TGCFI

0.26

0.54

−0.03

0.41

0.88

0.10 ± 0.06

0.25 ± 0.26

−0.29 ± 0.28

−0.30 ± 0.25

 FI

0.6

0.69

0.05

0.52

0.67

0.53

0.45 ± 0.09

0.67 ± 0.15

0.63 ± 0.12

Feed efficiency traits

 FCR

−0.11

− 0.25

0.09

− 0.19

−0.46

− 0.55

0.26

0.32 ± 0.11

0.97 ± 0.03

 RFI

− 0.17

−0.18

0.09

−0.18

− 0.22

−0.19

0.46

0.83

0.50 ± 0.10

  1. Bold indicates that the estimate significantly differs from zero
  2. ne Non estimable due to a non-convergence of the estimation model
  3. 1BWi and BWf: BW at the beginning and at the end of the FI period, respectively; TGCLOSS Loss of weight during the fasting period estimated as thermal growth coefficient during the fasting period, TGCCOMP Gain of weight during the feeding period estimated as the thermal growth coefficient during the refeeding period, BWG Body weight gain during the FI period, TGCFI Thermal growth coefficient during the FI period, FI Feed intake, FCR Feed conversion ratio, RFI Residual feed intake