Identification and characterization of cherry (Cerasus pseudocerasus G. Don) genes responding to parthenocarpy induced by GA3 through transcriptome analysis

Table 2 Quality control of the clean data

Sample	Raw of Number	Clean read%	Remove Adapter %	Ns Reads Rate %	Low quality %	Clean Q30 Bases Rate (%)	Mapping Rate %	Exon %	Intron %	Intergenic %
CK11	45,723,590	99.27	0.7	0.02	0	92.87	83	81.2	9.01	9.8
CK12	45,297,964	98.82	1.16	0.02	0	92.77	80	81.51	8.38	10.12
CK13	46,636,712	99.25	0.73	0.02	0	92.37	86	82.23	8.46	9.31
CK21	44,993,708	99.14	0.84	0.02	0	92.39	85	81.04	9.16	9.81
CK22	44,432,270	99.28	0.7	8.55E–05	0.02	91.63	84	80.06	10.15	9.79
CK23	45,263,166	99.06	0.91	0.02	0	92.17	82	81.5	9.04	9.46
T11	45,225,288	99.07	0.91	0.02	0	92.41	82	81.03	9.22	9.75
T12	47,694,260	98.96	1.02	0.02	0	92.13	86	82.08	8.45	9.47
T13	47,760,684	99.29	0.68	0	0.03	89.68	81	79.47	10.21	10.33
T21	45,251,876	99.11	0.87	0.02	0	92.46	76	81.01	9.35	9.64
T22	47,477,702	98.99	0.98	0.02	0	92.32	83	81	9.15	9.85
T23	45,849,530	99.21	0.77	0.02	0	92.38	80	81.66	8.86	9.48

The Ns reads rate indicates that N is too high; the number of sequences that have been removed accounts for the proportion of the original sequence number
Intergenic: new transcripts, expression noise, etc., result in sequences derived from intergenic regions
CK1 control groups without GA treatment in the anthesis stage
CK2 control groups without GA treatment in the hard nucleus stage
T1 GA treatment groups in the anthesis stage
T2 GA treatment groups in the hard-nucleus stage

ISSN: 2730-6844