Skip to main content

Advertisement

Rice of Northeast India harbor rich genetic diversity as measured by SSR markers and Zn/Fe content

Article metrics

  • 409 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important crops of the world and a major staple food for half of the World’s human population. The Northeastern (NE) region of India lies in the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot and about 45% of the total flora of the country is found in the region. Local rice cultivars from different states of NE India were analyzed for genetic diversity and population structure using microsatellite markers, and their zinc and iron content.

Results

A total of 149 bands were detected using twenty-two microsatellite markers comprising both random and trait-linked markers, showing 100% polymorphism and high value of expected heterozygosity (0.6311) and the polymorphism information content (0.5895). Nali Dhan cultivar of Arunachal Pradesh possessed the highest genetic diversity (0.3545) among studied populations while Moirangphou Khonganbi of Manipur exhibited the lowest genetic diversity (0.0343). The model-based population structure revealed that all the studied 65 rice cultivars were grouped into two clusters. Cluster I was represented by 36 cultivars and cluster II by 29 cultivars. Badalsali cultivar of Assam possessed the highest Zn content (75.8 μg/g) and Kapongla from Manipur possessed the lowest (17.98 μg/g). The highest and the lowest Fe content was found in Fazu (215.62 μg/g) and Idaw (11.42 μg/g) of Mizoram.

Conclusion

The result suggested rice cultivars of NE India possessing high genetic diversity (Nali dhan), high Zn (Badalsali) and Fe (Fazu) content can be useful as a source of germplasm for future rice improvement programs.

Background

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the staple food for more than 50 % of the world’s population. The rice production and consumption in Asia alone accounts for more than 90 % of the global rice yields [1]. It is imperative to develop measures to improve global rice production to warrant food security for increasing human populations. Although rice production has increased to about two folds in the past few decades with the introduction of improved varieties and proper crop management strategies, the need for high yielding, better varieties still remain unchanged. Bouis and Welch [2] suggested that increased rice productivity and the ability to deliver all the essential nutrients is crucial to meet both the energy needs and adequate nutritional health for the people in developing countries. Kennedy et al. [3] have reported that more than two billion people are affected with Iron (Fe), Iodine (I), Zinc (Zn), and vitamin A deficiencies, especially in poor families of developing countries, of which more than five million children die every year due to nutrient malnutrition [2]. Fe and Zn are essential micronutrients for all forms of life due to their functional importance in cell development and gene expression [4, 5]. Zn deficiency is known to be one of the most important malnutrition problems [6]. The effects of Zn deficiency include growth retardation, diarrhea, emotional disorders, reduction or absence of hormone secretion in male adolescents, rough skin, poor appetite, mental lethargy, delayed wound healing, weight loss, etc. [7]. Fe deficiency leads to blood loss, mal-absorption, chronic diseases, genetic disorders, etc. [8,9,10,11]. Increased Zn and Fe uptakes are required during crucial metabolic periods such as early human growth and pregnancy, so children and pregnant women are at higher risk of these nutrients deficiency [6, 12, 13]. It has been suggested by rice workers that the development of rice varieties with higher nutrient content may improve the nutritional health of people whose major diet is rice.

The Northeastern states of India, comprising Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura, lies within the international boundaries of Bhutan and China in the north, Bangladesh in the southeast and Myanmar in the west. This region constitutes the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot [14] and is inhabited by various ethnic groups of people who speak different dialects and perform different cultural practices. The topography and biogeography of the region make this place a picturesque and also rich in biodiversity of flora and fauna. About 45% of the total flora of the country is found in the region [15]. This region harbors the richest genetic diversity reservoir for agri-horticultural crops. Rice cultivation provides the main source of food and employment for the people of this region as most of the population is involved in agriculture and allied activities. About 72% of the total cultivated area is under agricultural cultivation practices in upland, lowland, and water fed areas [15]. Although a large number of rice cultivars are available, most of the rice cultivated in the region are high yielding varieties (HYV) developed using modern genetic engineering tools. This trend implies a possible narrowing of the natural gene pool. However, it is also surprising to know that the many indigenous farmers of the hilly areas are still practicing their own landrace or cultivar cultivation that they inherit from their forefathers, which suit the local microclimate and adaptation. The cultural importance of the local landraces is also depicted by these people.

Knowledge on the extent of genetic variation and relationship among genotypes is necessary for developing more effective breeding and conservation programs [16], Understanding and utilizing the genetic diversity in crop plants is crucial for sustaining the increasing global and local food demands [17]. Assessment of the genetic diversity of local rice landraces or cultivars will provide a valuable source as it can be useful for crop improvement programs, Integrated Pest Management (IPM) measures and sustainable development of agriculture. Rice varieties of this region possess unique traits which are of great interest to the plant breeders. Some of the useful qualities identified in these landraces include unique adaptive traits for cold tolerance, flooding and salt tolerance, etc. [15]. Many molecular markers have been used to assess genetic diversity within and between populations. Among them, microsatellite or SSR (Simple sequence repeat) are one of the most preferred for assessment of genetic diversity because they are reliable, rapid, easy to score, cost-effective and require only a small amount of DNA [18, 19]. The present study was performed to assess the genetic diversity of the local rice landraces of the Northeast states of India using SSR markers, with two aims i) to estimate the Zn and Fe contents and ii) to facilitate conservation and utilization of these landraces.

Results

Zn and Fe content

Table 1 summarizes the Zn and Fe content of rice cultivars used in this study. Zn content in the studied cultivars ranged from 17.98 μg/g to 75.8 μg/g with an average of 36.65 μg/g (Table 1). Badalsali cultivar of Assam possessed the highest Zn content and Kapongla of Manipur possessed the lowest. The Zn contents of Northeast rice cultivars (38.55 μg/g) were higher than that of improved varieties (32.17 μg/g) used in the current investigation.

Table 1 Zn and Fe content, Gene diversity and percentage polymorphism in the studied cultivars

Fe content ranged from Idaw (11.42 μg/g) to Fazu (215.62 μg/g) with an average of 59.29 μg/g (Table 1). Similar to Zn, Fe contents of Northeast rice cultivars (62.9 μg/g) were higher than that of improved varieties (39.41 μg/g) in the present study.

SSR polymorphism

The agarose gels showing banding patterns of some rice cultivars were presented in Figs. 1 and 2. Table 2 shows a summary of the genetic markers used in the current study. A total of 149 bands were detected using twenty-two SSR primers. All twenty-two SSR markers were found to be polymorphic (100% polymorphism). The average number of alleles per locus was 6.7727 and the maximum number of band [12] was generated by RM223 and the minimum [2] was generated by RM315. The mean number of effective alleles was found to be 3.3080. Major allele frequency (MAF) ranged from 0.2431 (RM246) to 0.9723 (RM443) with an average of 0.4973. Expected heterozygosity (HE) varied from 0.1157 (RM315) to 0.8466 (RM72) with an average of 0.6311 respectively. Nei’s genetic diversity varied from 0.1155 (RM315) to 0.8453 (RM72) with an average of 0.6301. Fst ranged from 0.5739 (RM223) to 0.9619 (RM443) with an average of 0.7870. Polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.1012 (RM315) to 0.8274 (RM72) averaging 0.5895. The summary statistics of each marker is shown in Table 2.

Fig. 1
figure1

A 2.5% agarose gel showing the banding pattern of Assam rice cultivars generated by RM1. M represents a 100 bp DNA ladder. Lane 1–9 Suhagmani, 10–19 Lokhamu

Fig. 2
figure2

A 2.5% agarose gel showing the banding pattern of Nagaland rice cultivars generated by RM1. M represents a 100 bp DNA ladder. Lane 1–2 Heido, 3–12 Ekemai, 13–18 Suko

Table 2 Summary of markers used in the present study

Population structure analysis

The model-based population structure analysis using STRUCTURE showed that the highest value of ΔK was at K = 2 (Fig. 3), grouping all the studied 65 rice cultivars into two clusters (Fig. 4), designated here as cluster I and cluster II. Principal Coordinates Analysis (Fig. 5) performed using GenAlEx and UPGMA tree (Fig. 6) constructed using MEGAfurther supplemented the STRUCTURE results. Both PCoA and UPGMA tree divided 65 rice cultivars into two groups. Cluster I was represented by 36 cultivars and cluster II was represented by 29 cultivars. In UPGMA tree, Cluster I was subdivided into four groups exhibiting rice cultivars of Manipur, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, and Japonica varieties. And cluster II could also be subdivided into four groups comprising rice cultivars of Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya and Indica varieties. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that the genetic variation of two clusters of 65 rice cultivars was distributed into 73% among populations and 27% within populations. Average distances (expected heterozygosity) between individuals in the same cluster varied from Cluster I (0.5197) to cluster II (0.5686). Fst values of Cluster I and Cluster II were found to be 0.2635 and 0.2107 respectively with an average of 0.2371. The mean alpha value was found to be 0.0663.

Fig. 3
figure3

Relationship between ΔK and K showing a peak at K = 2

Fig. 4
figure4

Population structure (barplot) of rice cultivars

Fig. 5
figure5

Principal coordinates analysis of 65 rice cultivars

Fig. 6
figure6

UPGMA tree based on Nei’s genetic distance (AS = Assam, AP = Arunachal Pradesh, MN = Manipur, MZ = Mizoram, ML = Meghalaya, NL = Nagaland, Ind = indica, Jap = japonica)

Population-wise diversity comparison (Table 1) showed that Nalidhan cultivar of Arunachal Pradesh possessed the highest genetic diversity (0.3545) among studied populations while Moirangphoukhonganbi of Manipur exhibited the lowest genetic diversity (0.0343). In state-wise comparison, the genetic diversity (HE) of Manipur rice cultivars ranged from 0.0343 (Moirangphoukhonganbi) to 0.1475 (Changlei), and that of Nagaland ranged from 0.1263 (Ekemai) to 0.2323 (Jakjatsuk), and Assam, from 0.0697 (Sakua) to 0.2475 (Bogaahoo), Arunachal Pradesh, from 0.1030 (Aamda) to 0.3545 (Nalidhan), Mizoram, from 0.1172 (Tai sanghar) to 0.2333 (Fare) and Meghalaya rice cultivars ranged from 0.1010 (Jaiamenil) to 0.1747 (Menilmibabaret). Rice cultivars of Arunachal Pradesh, in overall exhibited highest gene diversity (0.2022), followed by Nagaland (0.1896), Mizoram (0.1746), Assam (0.1492), Meghalaya (0.1378) and then Manipur (0.0788). The average genetic diversity of all indigenous cultivars was found to be 0.1575 which was higher than that of indica (0.1180) and japonica (0.1170) varieties.

Comparative analysis of gene diversity, Zn and Fe content showed that there was no significant correlation among all the three parameters. However, few cultivars with high gene diversity also showed higher Zn and Fe content (Table 3, Fig. 7).

Table 3 Correlations of genetic diversity, Zn and Fe content of 65 rice varieties, indicating no significance for all the test entries at p < 0.05
Fig. 7
figure7

Relationship of SSR, Zn and Fe diversity (Var1 = Zn content, Var2 = Fe content, Var3 = SSR genetic diversity)

Discussion

In this study, genetic structure and diversity analysis of 55 indigenous rice cultivars of Northeast India and 5 indica and 5 japonica test varieties were performed using twenty-two SSR markers comprising 9 random and 13 trait-linked markers, and Zn and Fe content. Assessments of genetic diversity of NE rice using molecular markers has been reported previously [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Though high genetic diversity was previously shown in the NE rice accessions, reports on micronutrients diversity are scarce. Micronutrient deficiencies to Zn and Fe, constitute the two most common nutrient deficiencies in humans [23, 26, 27], especially in developing countries [28]. Although rice is a major staple food for a large part of the world especially in Asia, it has been reported as a poor source of essential micronutrients and vitamins [29]. In the current study, relatively high Zn and Fe contents were detected in some of the cultivars. The Fe content in the present study was found to be higher than that of rice cultivars of West Bengal and adjoining areas, though zinc content was lower [23]. High Fe content was also previously reported in the Indian cultivars by Brar et al. [30]. The Zn content was higher and the Fe content was found to be lower than a previous report on local rice germplasm of Tripura state [31]. Average Zn and Fe contents in the present study were comparable with a previous report [30, 32]. In another report by Verma and Srivastav [33], among some aromatic and nonaromatic Indian rice cultivars, aromatic rice had higher Zn and Fe contents. Interestingly, Zn and Fe contents in the current study was found to be higher than the ones reported by Verma and Srivastav [33]. Therefore, to overcome the micronutrient deficiencies, the present study will be helpful for designing crop improvement programs, though more investigations are still needed to further find out higher contents of Zn and Fe since these micronutrients are essential for human health and development.

The NE rice cultivars contain considerable genetic diversity and variable traits which might be good sources for various improvement programs [20]. All SSR markers used in the present study were found to be polymorphic. A combination of random and trait-linked markers was utilized since Yadav et al. [34] reported trait-linked markers gave higher value of genetic diversity and Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) in some Indian rice germplasm than random markers, whereas several other workers have shown high genetic diversity in NE rice cultivars using random markers [20, 21, 24]. The number of alleles per locus (6.7727) found was higher than the ones reported earlier by Upadhyay et al. [35] (3.96 alleles per locus) and lower than that reported by Choudhury et al. [20] (13.57 alleles per locus). However, it was comparable with 7.9 alleles per locus reported by Das et al. [21]. The mean HE and PIC found in the present study showed a high value of heterozygosity index. The mean Fst values for all loci and between the two clusters were found to be 0.7786 and 0.1987 respectively indicating very high genetic differentiation among loci and among the clusters. Based on SSR analysis, there were seventeen highly informative markers (PIC> 0.50), viz., RM1, RM154, RM131, RM135, RM72, RM171, RM287, RM3825, RM246, RM260, RM525, RM219, RM223, RM8094, RM493, RM3412 and RM169; two informative markers (PIC between 0.25 and 0.50), RM153, RM125, and RM302; and two slightly informative markers (PIC< 0.25), RM315 and RM443 [36, 37].

Population structure analysis using STRUCTURE showed highest ΔK value at K = 2 revealing that the studied 65 rice cultivars were grouped into two clusters. The number of the cluster was in agreement to the previous studies: two clusters among 29 varieties of cultivated rice of NE India [20] and two clusters among 6 landraces of North-Western Indian Himalayas [38]. Roy et al. [24] have also reported a similar result of K = 2, among hill rice of Arunachal Pradesh, NE India, belonging to indica and japonica. In the current study, the identified two main clusters can also be divided into sub-clusters corresponding to state-wise grouping. A similar result of state-wise grouping was also observed in aromatic rice germplasm from North Eastern India [13]. According to Evano et al. [39], alpha value closed to zero indicated that most of the individuals were from one population or another, and an alpha value greater than 1 indicated that most individuals were admixed. The observed small alpha value in this study (0.0663) might indicate that most of the individuals originated from one population or another.

In some areas of NE India, rice has been cultivated in shifting or jhum lands which only depend on the Monsoon rain. These cultivars survive in long spells of rainless weather and may be good candidates to look for these variable traits. Other important traits include dark color and aroma in Chakhao rice of Manipur, resistance against blast, resistance to gall midge, deep water tolerance in Baon of Assam, drought resistance in Hmawrhang of Mizoram, etc. [15, 40, 41]. As evident from the current study, the genetic diversity of indigenous rice cultivars was found to be higher than that of agronomically improved varieties. These results are in agreement to a similar pattern observed for rice varieties of the Eastern Himalayan region of Northeast India [20]. The use of such genetic variability in breeding programs is a key factor for crop improvement [42]. Among the studied rice cultivars, Nalidhan cultivar of Arunachal Pradesh possessed the highest genetic diversity, followed by Vak and Boleng ammo cultivars. These high genetic diversity cultivars are promising candidates as sources for effective breeding or future rice improvement programs. However, some cultivars such as Moirangphou khonganbi, Moirangphou possessed a low level of genetic diversity suggesting necessary actionsshould be taken on the conservation of these landraces. Cultivars such as Vak, Bogaahoo and Tsulu tsuk possessed high genetic diversity and high Zn concentration. Similarly, Kawnglawng, Jakjatsuk, Yarte, Mezamew, etc. possessed high Fe content and high genetic diversity. Nalidhan, the cultivar with the highest genetic diversity also possessed Zn and Fe contents higher than the average observed for these studied populations. Lumre also possessed high genetic diversity, high Zn and average Fe content. The highest Zn containing Badalsali cultivar possessed a lower genetic diversity than the average of all the studied populations. Similarly, the Fazu cultivar with the highest Fe content showed lower genetic diversity than the average of all the studied populations. The present investigation showed that the majority of the cultivars with high genetic diversity had high Zn contents and many cultivars also exhibited high genetic diversity along with high Fe content.

Conclusion

The current study provides a better understanding of genetic structure, diversity, and micronutrient (Zn and Fe) richness in the indigenous rice cultivars of NE India. The cultivars possessing high genetic diversity (Nali dhan), high Zn (Badalsali) and Fe (Fazu) contents are promising candidates as parental lines for future rice breeding programs. These findings will further facilitate the conservation strategies and utilization of these landraces for developing sustainable rice improvement programs.

Methods

Plant material, collection and planting

Rice landraces were collected from six states of NE India. Details of collection sites are shown in Table 4. Indica and japonica check varieties were kind gifts from ICGEB, New Delhi, ABF, Hyderabad and ICAR, Kolasib. For isolation of DNA, individual cultivars were planted on polypots at Department of Botany, Mizoram University, India.

Table 4 Collected rice cultivars of NE India

Estimation of Zn and Fe content

Dehusked rice seeds were crushed into a fine powder using mortar and pestle. The powdered sample (0.1 g) was placed in a 100 ml conical flask and 20 ml of Nitric acid (HNO3) was added to it. The mixture was kept on a hot plate till the fuming of nitrogen dioxide ceased. Another 20 ml of HNO3 was added and the samples were kept on the hot plate at a high temperature until the solution turned colourless. Then hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was added to make the solution colourless. The mixture was heated until the solution was reduced to 3–5 ml. This extract was diluted to 20 ml with de-ionized water and then filtered through Whatman filter paper 1. The extract was then injected into Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu AA-7000, Japan) and the results were expressed in μg/g.

Genomic DNA isolation and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA was isolated from 15-day old seedlings following Edwards et al. [43]. Single leaflet of 15-day old seedling was used for isolation of DNA. The leaflet was macerated using a micropestle in a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube. After maceration, 400 μl of extraction buffer (200 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5, 250 mMNaCl, 25 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) was added to the tube. The sample was then vortexed vigorously for 1 min and centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 5 min. Then, 300 μl of the supernatant was transferred to a fresh centrifuge tube and an equal volume of Isopropanol was added. The samples were kept at room temperature for 2 min and then were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. The resulting pellets were air dried at room temperature and dissolved in 100 μl TE (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) buffer.

Twenty-two simple sequence repeats (SSR) primers (Table 5) were used for amplification of genomic DNA. Amplification was performed in ABI Veriti 96 well Thermal cycler (ABI, USA) in 25 μl reaction containing 1X PCR buffer, 100 μM dNTP mixture, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 U Taq polymerase (Genie, India), 50 ng of each primer and 50 ng template DNA. The amplification conditions were set as, initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The amplified products were electrophoresed on 2.5% agarose gel and visualized by standard ethidium bromide staining [43, 44].

Table 5 Details of SSR primers used (http://gramene.org/markers/microsat/all-ssr.html)

Genetic data analysis

Bands were scored using Alpha View software (Alpha Imager, Protein Simple, USA). Total number of alleles, number of effective alleles, number of polymorphic loci, observed and expected heterozygosity, Nei’sgenetic diversity [45], Fst, and population-wise diversity were calculated using genetic analysis package POPGENE 1.31 [46]. Major allele frequency (MAF) and the polymorphism information content (PIC) were calculated using PowerMarker 3.25 [47]. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) were performed in GenAlEx 6.5 [48]. The unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram was constructed using MEGA 6 [49] based on Nei’s genetic distance. The possible population structure was analyzed using STRUCTURE 2.3.4 [50]. The parameter was set as 100,000 for the length of burn-in period and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) repeats after burn-in was set as 100,000. A possible number of subpopulations (K) was set from K = 1 to K = 10. Structure Harvester [51] was used to find the final K value. Then, the relationship among genetic diversity (gene diversity), Zn and Fe contents were measured using STATISTICA 5.0 (Statsoft Inc., USA, 1995).

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its Additional files 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Abbreviations

AMOVA:

Analysis of molecular variance

Fst:

Genetic differentiation

HE :

Expected heterozygosity

HYV:

High yielding variety

MAF:

Major allele frequency

MCMC:

Markov Chain Monte Carlo

na:

Number of alleles

ne:

Effective number of alleles

Nei:

Nei’s genetic distance

PCoA:

Principal co-ordinates analysis

PIC:

Polymorphism information content

UPGMA:

The unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean

References

  1. 1.

    Bandumula N. Rice Production in Asia: Key to Global Food Security. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2018;88:1323.

  2. 2.

    Bouis H, Welch R. Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci. 2010;50:20–32.

  3. 3.

    Kennedy G, Nantel G, Shetty P. The scourge of “hidden hunger”: global dimensions of micronnutrientdefi ciencies. Food Nutr Agric. 2003;32:8–16.

  4. 4.

    Hambridge M. Human zinc deficiency. J Nutr. 2000;130(5):1344S–9S.

  5. 5.

    Zhang C. Essential functions of iron-requiring proteins in DNA replication, repair and cell cycle control. Plant Cell. 2014;5(10):750–60.

  6. 6.

    Roohani N, Hurrell R, Kelishadi R, Schulin R. Zinc and its importance for human health: an integrative review. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(2):144–57.

  7. 7.

    Prasad AS. Discovery of human zinc deficiency: its impact on human health and disease. Adv Nutr. 2013;4(2):176–90.

  8. 8.

    Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Daily GC. Food security, population and environment. Popul Dev Rev. 1993;19(1):1–32.

  9. 9.

    Goddard AF, James MW, McIntyre AS, Scott BB. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. Gut. 2011;60(10):1309–16.

  10. 10.

    De Falco L, Sanchez M, Silvestri L, Kannengiesser C, Muckenthaler MU, Iolascon A, Gouya L, Camaschella C, Beaumont C. Iron refractory iron deficiency anemia. Haematologica. 2013;98:845–53.

  11. 11.

    Miller JL. Iron deficiency anemia: a common and curable disease. Cold Spring HarbPerspect Med. 2013;3(7):a011866.

  12. 12.

    Brown KH, Wuehler SE, Peerson JM. The importance of zinc in human nutrition and estimation of the global prevalence of zinc deficiency. Food Nutr Bull. 2001;22(2):113–25.

  13. 13.

    Lee AI, Okam MM. Anemia in Pregnancy. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2011;25:241–59.

  14. 14.

    Myers N. Threatened biotas: “hots spots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist. 1988;8(3):187–208.

  15. 15.

    Hore DK. Rice diversity collection, conservation and management in northeastern India. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2005;52:1129–40.

  16. 16.

    Roy S, Banerjee A, Mawkhlieng B, Misra AK, Pattanayak A, Harish GD, Singh SK, Ngachan SV, Bansal KC. Genetic diversity and population structure in aromatic and quality rice (Oryza sativa L.) landraces from north-eastern India. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129607.

  17. 17.

    Enjuanes C, Klip IT, Bruguera J, Cladellas M, Ponikowski P, Banasiak W, van Veldhuisen DJ, van der Meer P, Jankowska EA, Comin-Colet J. Iron deficiency and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure: results from a multicenter European study. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174:268–75.

  18. 18.

    Gupta PK, Varshney RK. The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheet. Euphytica. 2000;113:163–85.

  19. 19.

    Li FP, Lee YS, Kwon SW, Li G, Park YJ. Analysis of genetic diversity and trait correlations among Korean landrace rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(3):6316–31.

  20. 20.

    Choudhury B, Khan ML, Dayanandan S. Genetic structure and diversity of indigenous rice (Oryza sativa) varieties in the eastern Himalayan region of Northeast India. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:228.

  21. 21.

    Das B, Sengupta S, Parida SK, Roy B, Ghosh M, Prasad M, Ghose TK. Genetic diversity and population structure of rice landraces from eastern and north eastern states of India. BMC Genet. 2013;14:71.

  22. 22.

    Choudhury DR, Singh N, Singh AK, Kumar S, Srinivasan K, Tyagi RK, Ahmad A, Singh NK, Singh R. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of rice germplasm from north-eastern region of India and development of a core germplasm set. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113094.

  23. 23.

    Roy SC, Sharma BD. Assessment of genetic diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm based on agro-morphology traits and zinc-iron content for crop improvement. PhysiolMolBiol Plants. 2014;20(2):209–24.

  24. 24.

    Roy S, Marndi BC, Mawkhlieng B, Banerjee A, Yadav RM, Misra AK, Bansal KC. Genetic diversity and structure in hill rice (Oryza sativa L.) landraces from the north-eastern Himalayas of India. BMC Genet. 2016;17:107.

  25. 25.

    Vanlalsanga, Singh YT. Genetic diversity and population structure in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) of Mizoram, north East India as revealed by morphological, biochemical and molecular markers. Biochem Genet. 2019;57:421–42.

  26. 26.

    Meng F, Wei Y, Yang X. Iron content and bioavailability in rice. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;18(4):333–8.

  27. 27.

    Scheider JM, Fujii ML, Lamp CL, Lonnerdal B, Dewey KG, Zidenberg-Cher S. Anemia, iron deficiency, and iron deficiency anemia in 12-36-mo-old children from low-income families. Am J ClinNutr. 2005;82:1269–75.

  28. 28.

    Anuradha K, Agarwal S, Batchu AK, Babu AP, Swamy BPM, Longvah T, Sarla N. Evaluating rice germplasm for iron and zinc concentration in brown rice and seed dimensions. J Phytol. 2012;4(1):19–25.

  29. 29.

    Narayanan NN, Vasconcelos MW, Grusak MA. Expression profiling of Oryza sativa metal homeostasis genes in different rice cultivars using a cDNA macroarray. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2007;45:277–86.

  30. 30.

    Brar B, Jain S, Singh R, Jain RK. Genetic diversity for iron and zinc contents in a collection of 220 rice ( Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Indian J. Genet. 2011;71(1):67–73.

  31. 31.

    Dikshit N, Sivaraj N, Sultan SM, Datta M. Diversity analysis of grain characteristics and micronutrient content in rice landraces of Tripura, India. Bangladesh J Bot. 2016;45(5):1143–9.

  32. 32.

    Jajda HM, Patel KG, Patel SR, Solanki VH, Patel KN, Singhh S. Comparative efficacy of two standard methods for determination of iron and zinc in fruits, pulses and cereals. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(2):1096–102.

  33. 33.

    Verma DK, Srivastav PP. Proximate composition, mineral content and fatty acids analyses of aromatic and non-aromatic Indian rice. Rice Sci. 2017;24(1):21–31.

  34. 34.

    Yadav S, Singh A, Singh MR, Goel N, Vinod KK, Mohapatra T, Singh AK. Assessment of genetic diversity in Indian rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L.): use of random versus trait-linked microsatellite markers. J Genet. 2013;92:545–57.

  35. 35.

    Upadhyay P, Neeraja CN, Kole C, Singh VK. Population structure and genetic diversity in popular rice varieties of India as evidenced from SSR analysis. Biochem Genet. 2012;50:770–83.

  36. 36.

    Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction ofa genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment lengthpolymorphism. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32:314–31.

  37. 37.

    Freeg HA, Anis GB, Abo-Shousha AA, El-Banna AN, El-Sabagh A. Genetic diversity among some rice genotypes with different drought tolerance based on SSR markers. CercetAgron Mold. 2016;3(169):39–50.

  38. 38.

    Gayacharan, Bisht IS, Pandey A, Yadav MC, Rana JC. Population structure of upland red rice (Oryza sativa L.) landraces from north-western Indian Himalayas. Ind J Biotechnol. 2015;14:42–8.

  39. 39.

    Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–20.

  40. 40.

    Singh KI, Singh MP, Sharma PR, Singh TR. Screening of certain promising local rice varieties for resistance to the Manipur gall midge (Orseoliaoryzae wood-Mason) biotype. Indian J Entomol. 2006;68(3):265–8.

  41. 41.

    Mahender A, Swain DM, Gitishree D, Subudhi HN, Rao GJN. Molecular analysis of native Manipur rice accessions for resistance against blast. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:1321–9.

  42. 42.

    Babu BK, Meena V, Agarwal V, Agarwal PK. Population structure and genetic diversity analysis of Indian and exotic rice (Oryza sativa L.) accessions using SSR markers. Mol Biol Rep. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3304-5.

  43. 43.

    Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thomson C. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(6):1349.

  44. 44.

    Sambrook J, MacCallum P, Russell D. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 3. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.

  45. 45.

    Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973;70:3321–3.

  46. 46.

    Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T. POPGENE version 1.32. Ag/for molecular biology and biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta and Center for International Forestry Research; 1999.

  47. 47.

    Liu K, Muse SV. PowerMarker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):2128–9.

  48. 48.

    Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(19):2537–9.

  49. 49.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. MolBiolEvol. 2013;30:2725–9.

  50. 50.

    Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–59.

  51. 51.

    Earl DA, von Holdt BM. Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conser Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–61.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank NBPGR, Umium, Meghalaya for the kind supply of rice cultivars. Authors are thankful to Dr. Usha Bhardwaj for her constructive comments and thoughtful ideas. Authors also thank all the farmers for their kind gift.

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board, Govt. of India (SB/FT/LS-381/2012) and University Grants Commission, Govt. of India (F. 20 (26)/2012 (BSR)) are acknowledged for financial supports. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

VS and SPS performed the experiments and analyzed the data. YTS conceived, designed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Y. Tunginba Singh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that no permission was required for sampling.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanlalsanga, Singh, S.P. & Singh, Y.T. Rice of Northeast India harbor rich genetic diversity as measured by SSR markers and Zn/Fe content. BMC Genet 20, 79 (2019) doi:10.1186/s12863-019-0780-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Northeast India
  • Rice landraces
  • Genetic diversity
  • Microsatellite marker
  • Zn/ Fe content