Table 5 Overlap ratio of original data and HapMap data with Park and Conrad's data
From: Comparative analysis of copy number variation detection methods and database construction
Programs | Average of overlap ratio of HapMap with Conrad's data[28]and Park's data[29] | Average of overlap ratio of original data with Conrad's data[28]and Park's data[29] | Average of overlap ratio of original data of commonly detected regions at least two programs, with Conrad's data[28]and Park's data[29] | Average of overlap ratio of original data of commonly detected regions in more than two individuals, with Conrad's data[28]and Park's data[29] | Average of overlap ratio of original data of commonly detected regions in more than nine individuals with Conrad's data[28]and Park's data[29] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PennCNV [8986/5619] | 52.2/53.2%*$ 44.6/50.8%$$ | 35.8/39.7% 32.1/39.0% | 42.5/45.2% 42.7/48.2% | 57.8/58.6% 58.6/63.9% | 61.8/62.3% 62.9/68.0% |
Birdseye (part of Birdsuite) [6959/5063] | 68.7/69.6% 62.9/65.6% | 71.0/71.6% 81./83.2% | 62.1/63.1% 71.4/74.6% | 75.6/75.8% 86.7/88.5% | 79.4/79.5% 91.6/92.9% |
Birdsuite [31852/25794] | 66.3/66.6% 53.4/56.5% | 65.0/65.3% 63.8/66.8% | 65.2/65.9% 73.9/77.1% | 67.9/67.9% 67.1/70.1% | 70.6/70.6% 69.7/72/7% |
DNAcopy [10243/4436] | 63.2/64.2% 49.6/54.1% | 24.2/27.8% 20.0/25.6% | 33.8/36.6% 33.4/38.6% | 66.4/66.8% 61.9/66.4% | 72.5/72.5% 67.6/71.1% |
CGHseg [4043/1966] | 54.7/56.6% 38.9/45.4% | 31.1/38.8% 21.9/31.7% | 38.1/41.6% 33.7/40.4% | 68.0/69.6% 56.3/63.3% | 74.5/75.5% 60.8/65.5% |