Genome-wide association study for birth weight in Nellore cattle points to previously described orthologous genes affecting human and bovine height

  • Yuri T Utsunomiya1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Adriana S do Carmo1Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Roberto Carvalheiro2,

        Affiliated with

        • Haroldo HR Neves1,

          Affiliated with

          • Márcia C Matos1,

            Affiliated with

            • Ludmilla B Zavarez1,

              Affiliated with

              • Ana M Pérez O’Brien3,

                Affiliated with

                • Johann Sölkner3,

                  Affiliated with

                  • John C McEwan4,

                    Affiliated with

                    • John B Cole5,

                      Affiliated with

                      • Curtis P Van Tassell6,

                        Affiliated with

                        • Flávio S Schenkel7,

                          Affiliated with

                          • Marcos VGB da Silva8,

                            Affiliated with

                            • Laercio R Porto Neto9, 10,

                              Affiliated with

                              • Tad S Sonstegard6 and

                                Affiliated with

                                • José F Garcia11Email author

                                  Affiliated with

                                  BMC Genetics201314:52

                                  DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-52

                                  Received: 19 December 2012

                                  Accepted: 5 June 2013

                                  Published: 13 June 2013

                                  Abstract

                                  Background

                                  Birth weight (BW) is an economically important trait in beef cattle, and is associated with growth- and stature-related traits and calving difficulty. One region of the cattle genome, located on Bos primigenius taurus chromosome 14 (BTA14), has been previously shown to be associated with stature by multiple independent studies, and contains orthologous genes affecting human height. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) for BW in Brazilian Nellore cattle (Bos primigenius indicus) was performed using estimated breeding values (EBVs) of 654 progeny-tested bulls genotyped for over 777,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

                                  Results

                                  The most significant SNP (rs133012258, PGC = 1.34 × 10-9), located at BTA14:25376827, explained 4.62% of the variance in BW EBVs. The surrounding 1 Mb region presented high identity with human, pig and mouse autosomes 8, 4 and 4, respectively, and contains the orthologous height genes PLAG1, CHCHD7, MOS, RPS20, LYN, RDHE2 (SDR16C5) and PENK. The region also overlapped 28 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) previously reported in literature by linkage mapping studies in cattle, including QTLs for birth weight, mature height, carcass weight, stature, pre-weaning average daily gain, calving ease, and gestation length.

                                  Conclusions

                                  This study presents the first GWAS applying a high-density SNP panel to identify putative chromosome regions affecting birth weight in Nellore cattle. These results suggest that the QTLs on BTA14 associated with body size in taurine cattle (Bos primigenius taurus) also affect birth weight and size in zebu cattle (Bos primigenius indicus).

                                  Keywords

                                  GWAS Birth weight Bos primigenius indicus Nellore cattle Stature

                                  Background

                                  Birth weight (BW) is an economically important trait in beef cattle, and is usually the first characteristic measured in a calf. Birth weight is associated with growth-related traits [1], mature size [2] and carcass weight, thus being a valuable production indicator, as well as a selection criterion to improve calving ease [3, 4].

                                  Despite the beef industry’s pursuit of animals with rapid growth, yielding heavier carcasses, selection for these objectives needs to be properly balanced against selection for reproductive traits, which have great economic importance in beef cattle production systems [5, 6]. While low estimated breeding values (EBVs) for BW are associated with reduced calf viability [4] and lower growth rates [3, 7], the use of sires with high EBVs for BW on dams with small pelvic size may result in higher rates of dystocia [7] and increased perinatal mortality [8]. These antagonisms result from the strong association of birth weight with the body size of the calf, i.e., with the stature of the animal [2]. Calving difficulties can result from a mismatch between pelvic opening and calf size [6]. This relationship between BW with reproductive and growth/size traits highlights the importance of understanding the underlying genetic architecture of BW.

                                  Birth weight exhibits sufficient variability and heritability in the Nellore breed (Bos primigenius indicus), with an average of 29.8 ± 2.7 kg [9] and estimated heritability between 0.25 and 0.33 [1, 9, 10]. Despite the low frequency of dystocia in Nellore cows, BW has been recorded and used to monitor genetic trend. One selection strategy of the breeding programs in Brazil has been to preferentially use sires with higher EBVs for weaning and yearling weights, but with low or close to average EBVs for BW [11]. The identification of major genes and variants affecting multiple weight and carcass traits or influencing BW alone would be of help to balance these conflicting goals, because BW is positively correlated with weaning and yearling weights [1].

                                  In the past two decades, linkage studies attempting to map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting weight, growth, or stature in cattle have been published (e.g. [1216]). The release of the reference bovine genome [17], the discovery of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across breeds [18, 19], and the availability of high-throughput microarrays have enhanced the process of mapping loci that affect complex traits. This has led to several population-based investigations of associations between weight/growth/height phenotypes with genome-wide variants in different cattle breeds [15, 2023].

                                  In particular, two regions of the bovine genome associated with stature and growth have been highlighted recently. The first, located on Bos primigenius taurus (BTA) autosome 6 [20, 23], shelters the orthologous genes NCAPG and LCORL, which have been also found to be associated with adult height in humans [24, 25]. The second, located on BTA14 [15, 2123], contains the genes PLAG1, CHCHD7, RDHE2, MOS, RPS20, LYN, PENK and TGS1, that were previously found to affect stature in both cattle and humans [22, 24, 2628]. Importantly, the majority of the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) reported in literature were conducted in the humpless subspecies of cattle (Bos primigenius taurus, known as taurine cattle), and GWAS in the humped bovine subspecies (Bos primigenius indicus, often referred as indicine or zebu cattle) are only now emerging, especially because the first SNP microarrays were optimized for taurine cattle [19].

                                  In this paper, results from a genome-wide scan for SNPs associated with BW variation in Nellore cattle using EBVs of progeny-tested Brazilian bulls are reported. As EBVs take into account information from performance of the individual, progeny and parents, pedigree relationships, and systematic management and environmental factors, they can be used as composite phenotypes for proceeding with association analyses (see, e.g., [29]). The objective of this study was to identify putative SNP associated with differences in BW and to explore the genomic regions around them to unravel prospective functional relationships among weight, fertility, and growth/size traits.

                                  Results

                                  Genotype informativeness and quality control

                                  From the initial set of 777,961 SNPs, 42,669 (5.5%) were non-autosomal markers. Fifty four autosomal SNPs with redundant genomic coordinates were identified and excluded from further analyses. The identity by state (IBS) check revealed no unexpected sample duplicates. A total of 223,309 (30.4%) markers were excluded due to minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.02. The number of SNPs excluded due to SNP Call Rate (CRSNP) < 0.98 and Fisher’s exact test P-value for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) < 1 × 10-5 were 122,611 (16.7%) and 13,194 (1.8%), respectively. Five individuals were removed due to low Call Rate (CRIND). The final dataset included data for 649 individuals and 434,020 SNPs.

                                  Descriptive statistics of dependent variables

                                  Based on the results for the Shapiro-Wilk test, there was no evidence that EBVs deviated from normality (P = 0.415), and no outliers were observed. Average accuracy was 0.87 ± 0.11, with minimum, median and maximum accuracies of 0.51, 0.91 and 0.99, respectively. After fitting the regression in formula (2), there was no evidence against the hypotheses of normally distributed (P = 0.57) and homoskedastic residuals (studentized Breusch-Pagan test, P = 0.11). These findings suggest that the dependent variables used were reliable and did not violate possible assumptions of the statistical analyses used hereafter.

                                  Population substructure

                                  The Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) revealed genetic stratification among the Nellore samples (Figure 1). After using k-means clustering to assign individuals to two different groups according to their coordinates in the PCoA, a highly significant association (P = 5.41 × 10-34) between the k-means assignments (ncluster1 = 531, ncluster2 = 118) and breeding program subgroups (nsubgroup1 = 352, nsubgroup2 = 297) was found. For the k-means groups, BW average was 0.434 ± 1.306 in cluster 1 and -0.216 ± 1.295 in cluster 2. For the breeding program subgroups, the trait averages in subgroup 1 and subgroup 2 were 0.683 ± 1.276 and -0.119 ± 1.255, respectively. When considering either k-means clusters or breeding program subgroups as subpopulation labels, the EBVs showed homogeneity of variance (P > 0.05), but the trait mean was significantly different between groups (P = 1.21 × 10-6 and P = 4.37 × 10-15 for k-means and breeding program, respectively). Thus, population substructure was a potential confounder in the genotype-EBV association analysis, which justified the inclusion of eigenvectors from the PCoA as fixed effects in the linear model.
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                                  Figure 1

                                  Principal Coordinates Analysis based on the genomic kinship coefficient. Percentages inside brackets correspond to the variance explained by each respective eigenvector. Each ‘+’ represents an individual and ovals are 95% inertia ellipses. A) Subjects colored according to breeding program subgroups. B) Subjects colored according to k-means clustering results.

                                  Association analysis

                                  A total of 32 eigenvectors from the PCoA were significantly correlated with the phenotypes, which together explained 15.23% of the genotypic variability. Residuals from the weighted regression on these significant eigenvectors were used as the dependent variable for the SNP association analysis. The quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot (Figure 2) showed that the deviation of the observed test statistics from the theoretical quantiles was mild and acceptable (λ = 1.002831), and the values were adjusted for the inflation factor via Genomic Control (GC). The T 2 values deviating from the expected values were interpreted as SNPs departing from the null hypothesis. The genome-wide deflated P-values are shown in Figure 3.
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                                  Figure 2

                                  Quantile-quantile plot for the test statistics 2 ) used in the association analysis.

                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                                  Figure 3

                                  Manhattan plot of genome - wide - log 10 ( P-values ) for birth weight estimated breeding values in Nellore cattle. The horizontal line represents the Bonferroni significance threshold (α = 1.15 × 10-7).

                                  A peak crossing the boundary for Bonferroni significance (α = 1.15 × 10-7) was detected on BTA14, comprising 5 SNPs (Table 1) which were highly linked (mean r2 = 0.728 ± 0.12). The most significant SNP (rs133012258, P GC = 1.34 × 10-9), located at BTA14:25376827, had an estimated allele substitution effect of 0.452 kg (i.e., for each extra A allele, the BW breeding value is expected to increase 0.452 kg), with lower and upper limits for the 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.306 kg and 0.598 kg, respectively, and the percentage of the variance in sires EBVs explained by the SNP was 4.62% (with a 95% CI of 2.12-8.09%). The overall rs133012258 A allele frequency was 0.274, whereas the breeding program subgroups 1 and 2 had frequencies of 0.351 and 0.184, respectively. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the EBVs (in standard deviations) for the three genotype classes of rs133012258. In both Illumina TOP and Forward allele notation, the AB correspondence for rs133012258 was A = A and B = G.
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                                  Figure 4

                                  Box plots for the birth weight estimated breeding values according to rs133012258 genotypes. Values in the y axis are expressed in terms of standard units.

                                  Table 1

                                  Summary of parameters and statistics estimated for the identified significant SNPs

                                  Ensembl variant ID

                                  Illumina probe ID

                                  BTA14 Position (bp)

                                  n

                                  Effect allele

                                  Allele frequency

                                  CR a(%)

                                  HWE P-value

                                  βb(kg)

                                  SE

                                  T 2 c

                                  GC-T 2 d

                                  P-value

                                  rs133012258

                                  BovineHD1400007343

                                  25376827

                                  649

                                  A

                                  0.274

                                  100.00

                                  0.920

                                  0.452

                                  0.074

                                  36.858

                                  36.753

                                  1.34×10-9

                                  rs41627948

                                  BovineHD1400007374

                                  25504073

                                  648

                                  B

                                  0.181

                                  99.85

                                  0.110

                                  0.522

                                  0.090

                                  33.202

                                  33.108

                                  8.72×10-9

                                  rs42646720

                                  BovineHD1400007144

                                  24590812

                                  649

                                  B

                                  0.243

                                  100.00

                                  0.390

                                  0.457

                                  0.081

                                  31.999

                                  31.909

                                  1.62×10-8

                                  rs136764901

                                  BovineHD1400007159

                                  24651537

                                  641

                                  B

                                  0.244

                                  98.77

                                  0.200

                                  0.459

                                  0.082

                                  31.546

                                  31.457

                                  2.04×10-8

                                  rs136287861

                                  BovineHD1400006765

                                  23313228

                                  645

                                  A

                                  0.272

                                  99.38

                                  0.766

                                  0.408

                                  0.075

                                  29.580

                                  29.497

                                  5.60×10-8

                                  a CR Call rate.

                                  b β Estimated allele substitution effect.

                                  c T 2 Chi-squared statistics for β: http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_IEq1_HTML.gif .

                                  d GC-T 2 Corrected Chi-squared statistics for β. Genomic control correction was performed by dividing the χ2 statistics by the distribution inflation/deflation factor estimate (λ = 1.002831).

                                  One of the 5 significant SNPs, rs42646720 (BTA14:24590812, P GC = 1.62 × 10-8), is located within intron 2 of the gene Kell blood group complex subunit-related family, member 4 (XKR4 or KIAA1889, ENSBTAG00000044050). Thirteen genes were found within 500 kb of the most significant SNP (Figure 5), including the human height-associated orthologous genes PLAG1, CHCHD7, MOS, RPS20, LYN, RDHE2 (SDR16C5) and PENK (Table 2). The bovine reference genome sequence of this region was found to have high identity with human (Homo sapiens - HSA), pig (Sus scrofa - SSC) and mouse (Mus musculus - MMU) autosomes 8 (HSA8), 4 (SSC4) and 4 (MMU4), respectively (Figure 6), and the majority of the genes had homology across species (Table 2). The most significant SNP also overlapped 28 QTLs previously reported in the literature by linkage mapping studies using different cattle breeds (Table 3), including QTLs for birth weight, mature height, carcass weight, stature, pre-weaning average daily gain, calving ease and gestation length.
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Fig5_HTML.jpg
                                  Figure 5

                                  Regional association plot for birth weight in the 1 Mb window around rs133012258. Upper box: each dot represents a SNP, and its color heat the degree of linkage disequilibrium with rs133012258 (black diamond). The horizontal dashed line represents the Bonferroni significance threshold (α = 1.15 × 10-7). Lower box: genes (green arrows; right-handed = positive strand, left-handed = negative strand) within the region in the UMD v3.1 assembly.

                                  Table 2

                                  List of genes within the 1 Mb region surrounding the most significant SNP (rs133012258)

                                  Gene

                                  Ensembl ID

                                  BTA14 coordinates

                                  Distance from SNP (kb)

                                  Strand

                                  HSA8 homology

                                  SSA4 homology

                                  MMA4 homology

                                  Description

                                  U6

                                  ENSBTAG00000043923

                                  25492090:25492184

                                  115.4

                                  +

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  U6 spliceosomal RNA

                                  PENK

                                  ENSBTAG00000004924

                                  25218586:25222991

                                  153.8

                                  -

                                  ENSG00000181195

                                  ENSSSCG00000006243

                                  ENSMUSG00000045573

                                  Proenkephalin-A

                                  IMPAD1

                                  ENSBTAG00000015637

                                  25544907:25560879

                                  168.1

                                  -

                                  ENSG00000104331

                                  ENSSSCG00000006242

                                  ENSMUSG00000066324

                                  Inositolmonophosphatase 3

                                  SDR16C6

                                  ENSBTAG00000040321

                                  25153583:25179651

                                  197.2

                                  -

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  ENSMUSG00000071019

                                  Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family 16C member 6

                                  SDR16C5 (RDHE2)

                                  ENSBTAG00000018570

                                  25105062:25117554

                                  259.3

                                  -

                                  ENSG00000170786

                                  ENSSSCG00000006245

                                  ENSMUSG00000028236

                                  Epidermal retinol dehydrogenase 2

                                  Unknown

                                  ENSBTAG00000039031

                                  25067486:25067823

                                  309.0

                                  -

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  Uncharacterizedprotein

                                  CHCHD7

                                  ENSBTAG00000033284

                                  25052885:25058779

                                  318.0

                                  +

                                  ENSG00000170791

                                  ENSSSCG00000006246

                                  ENSMUSG00000042198

                                  Coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 7

                                  PLAG1

                                  ENSBTAG00000004022

                                  25007291:25009296

                                  367.5

                                  -

                                  ENSG00000181690

                                  ENSSSCG00000006247

                                  ENSMUSG00000003282

                                  Pleiomorphic adenoma gene 1

                                  MOS

                                  ENSBTAG00000019145

                                  24975950:24976948

                                  399.9

                                  -

                                  ENSG00000172680

                                  ENSSSCG00000006248

                                  ENSMUSG00000078365

                                  V-mosMoloneymurine sarcoma viral oncogenehomolog

                                  U1

                                  ENSBTAG00000028889

                                  24970516:24970679

                                  406.1

                                  +

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  U1 spliceosomal RNA

                                  RPS20

                                  ENSBTAG00000019147

                                  24955079:24956324

                                  420.5

                                  -

                                  ENSG00000008988

                                  ENSSSCG00000006249

                                  ENSMUSG00000028234

                                  40S ribosomalprotein S20

                                  snoU54

                                  ENSBTAG00000045097

                                  24955769:24955835

                                  421.0

                                  -

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  No homologues

                                  Small nucleolar RNA U54

                                  LYN

                                  ENSBTAG00000020034

                                  24847257:24920713

                                  456.1

                                  +

                                  ENSG00000254087

                                  ENSSSCG00000006250

                                  ENSMUSG00000042228

                                  Tyrosine-proteinkinaseLyn

                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Fig6_HTML.jpg
                                  Figure 6

                                  Ensembl alignments of UMD v3. 1 sequence for the 1 Mb region surrounding rs133012258. The bovine reference genome sequence was aligned against (from top to bottom) the human (GRCh37 assembly), pig (Sscrofa10.2 assembly) and mouse (GRCm38 assembly) genome builds. Gene colors: yellow - merged Ensembl/Havana, red - protein coding, blue - processed transcript, grey - pseudogene, purple - RNA gene. Triangles: black - breakpoint between different chromosomes, blue - inversion in chromosome, brown - breakpoint on chromosome, red - gap between two underlying slices.

                                  Table 3

                                  QTLdb hits within the 1 Mb region surrounding the most significant SNP (rs133012258)

                                  Trait

                                  BTA14 coordinates

                                  QTLdb ID

                                  PubMed ID

                                  Body weight (birth)

                                  6311565:71762521

                                  5375

                                  19016677

                                  Height (mature)

                                  19204282:42398519

                                  10962

                                  20477797

                                  Carcass weight

                                  25224396:30870876

                                  1375

                                  16151698

                                   

                                  10808022:28658498

                                  10960

                                  20477797

                                  Stature

                                  25219037:65017465

                                  4613

                                  10575619

                                  Pre-weaning average daily gain

                                  25224396:35530275

                                  2630

                                  15537758

                                  Calving ease (maternal)

                                  19204282:28658498

                                  10959

                                  20477797

                                  Gestation length

                                  6311565:30372479

                                  5374

                                  19016677

                                   

                                  17512260:48646289

                                  5385

                                  19016677

                                  Rump angle

                                  25224396:29928419

                                  1592

                                  16230715

                                  Longissimus muscle area

                                  19204282:42398519

                                  10964

                                  20477797

                                  Fat thickness at the 12th rib

                                  19204282:28658498

                                  10961

                                  20477797

                                  Marbling score

                                  16670076:73064076

                                  1334

                                  14677852

                                  Abnormal flavor intensity

                                  5565085:28658498

                                  4833

                                  18254735

                                  Tick resistance

                                  5545944:77366190

                                  9917

                                  17894560

                                  Milk yield

                                  25372161:25525285

                                  6209

                                  18650300

                                   

                                  16243029:28716621

                                  3608

                                  12729552

                                  Milk fat yield (or percentage)

                                  13401044:35992517

                                  2733

                                  9691050

                                   

                                  1641277:25448723

                                  3408

                                  12605852

                                   

                                  25224396:29928419

                                  2676

                                  14762090

                                   

                                  13401044:35992517

                                  2732

                                  9691050

                                  Milk protein yield (or percentage)

                                  1641277:56300551

                                  3413

                                  12605852

                                   

                                  9479897:44651695

                                  2604

                                  12778594

                                   

                                  1641277:81189386

                                  10099/10100/10101

                                  18298934

                                  Somatic cell score

                                  13401044:35992517

                                  2734

                                  9691050

                                   

                                  13401044:35992517

                                  2776

                                  14556700

                                   

                                  20567087:44651695

                                  4884

                                  17954769

                                  Clinical mastitis

                                  9479131:44651695

                                  3177

                                  14762087

                                  Discussion

                                  Five SNPs on BTA14 were identified as associated with BW in Nellore cattle (P < 1.15 × 10-7), whose surrounding region has been shown to contain many QTLs, genes and variants affecting stature-related traits in cattle by several independent studies [1215, 2123]. More particularly, the genes PLAG1, CHCHD7, RDHE2, MOS, RPS20, LYN and PENK have been found to influence both human and cattle height [2228].

                                  The BTA14 region pointed out by the present study has also been shown to be associated with reproductive traits. Cole et al. [16] reported a QTL on BTA14 associated with stillbirth, which also has been associated with body size in dairy cattle [8, 30], but found no effect on stature or other conformation traits on that chromosome. The region also associates with many fertility and growth-related traits in the indicine breed Brahman, for example scrotal circumference [31, 32], age at the first corpus luteum[31, 33], blood levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) [32, 33] and hip height [33].

                                  A significant SNP was found within intron 2 of the XKR4 gene in the present study. Lindholm-Perry et al. [34] identified five SNPs near XKR4 associated with feed intake and gain in crossbred steers. Bolormaa et al. [35] found five SNPs in a narrow region of BTA14 encompassing XKR4 associated with rump fat thickness measured at the P8 position (CHILLP8) in seven breeds of cattle, including taurine, indicine and composite breeds. The authors found that four of these SNPs were also associated with CHILLP8 in a confirmatory sample of 1,338 animals, including Angus, Hereford and Brahman cattle. Furthermore, Porto Neto et al. [36] performed a replication study using samples of Belmont Red, Santa Gertrudis and Brahman animals genotyped for SNPs within XKR4 and found that although the SNP effect may vary depending on the breed, the variant rs42646708 (BTA14:24573257) explain around 1.3% of CHILLP8 variance in cattle. This SNP is also located within intron 2 of XKR4, only 17.6 kb apart from the intronic SNP detected in the present study, which strongly suggests XKR4 as a candidate gene for being further explored in future studies of weight and carcass traits in Nellore cattle.

                                  The most significant SNP (rs133012258, P GC = 1.34 × 10-9) was found to explain 4.62% of the variance in sires EBVs, with a 95% CI of 2.12-8.09%. One hundred and eighty loci associated with human adult height explain only 10% of the phenotypic variance together, while individual loci account for 0.4% or less [37]. SNPs analyzed by [22] within a nearby BTA14 region explain from 0.29 to 2.53% of the bovine stature variability, and the quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) spanning MOS, CHCHD7 and PLAG1 described by [27] explain from 1.10 to 3.50% of height in Jersey and Holstein breeds. Furthermore, the genome-wide survey performed by [21] provided strong evidence for two QTL on BTA14 and BTA21 that together explain at least 10% of the variation of EBVs for calving ease in the German Fleckvieh.

                                  Considering that multiple stature-related traits are governed by variants with small effects, and that the genomic region identified in this study has been previously found to be associated with several of these traits, the putative SNP detected in the present analysis can be considered as a marker in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with major untyped (i.e., not probed by the SNP assay used) causative variants affecting BW and other height-associated traits in Nellore cattle, and further studies would be needed to determine if the QTNs reported by [27] are also segregating in the Nellore population. Also, future investigations are needed to better characterize the effect of nearby SNPs on other weight and carcass traits in Nellore cattle, as it is not clear yet how the putative pleiotropic effect of these variants would be used towards balancing conflicting selection goals for birth, weaning and yearling weights. Although we cannot confirm that the allele substitution effects of these SNPs work in the same direction for all three traits, because only birth weight was analyzed here, these findings suggest that the SNPs identified would be key polymorphisms to be monitored over time. In a scenario where the SNP effects have the same direction in all three traits, one strategy could be avoiding strong positive selection or drifting of the allele that contributes to higher BW EBVs, and identify and promote positive selection of other variants that have effects on weaning and yearling weights only.

                                  The high identity found in the alignment of this BTA14 region against other mammalian species genomes suggests that these orthologous genes are located in a conserved syntenic block which may have arisen and been maintained after speciation from a common ancestor of the mammal clade. Moreover, the evidence for variants associated with growth and stature within this BTA14 region in both taurine and zebu cattle raises two hypotheses: 1) these variants have been introgressed into Nellore via historical admixture with taurine Creole cattle in the maternal line, and was maintained in the breed in spite of several generations of backcrossing; 2) these are ancient polymorphisms, probably already segregating in the founder population of wild Aurochs (Bos primigenius) before subspecies formation.

                                  Regarding functional meaning, the set of genes reported participate in diverse growth and tumor development mechanisms. Among these genes, PLAG1 is the most appealing functional candidate. It is an oncogene that encodes a transcription factor broadly expressed during fetal development, but is down-regulated at birth [27]. It interacts with several growth factors controlling body size, including IGF2[38]. In addition, PLAG1 knock-out mice have been shown to have marked growth retardation and reduced fertility [39]. In a replication study, [28] confirmed the findings reported by [27], demonstrating association of growth rate and early life and peripubertal body weight with PLAG1 polymorphisms, supporting its status as a key regulator of mammalian growth.

                                  The lack of significant association between BW and SNPs within other previously described weight- and height-related chromosome regions in the present study should not be interpreted as a lack of existence of true association, but rather it might be due to limitations specific to this study. Firstly, because complex trait mapping requires large sample sizes and only 649 bulls were analyzed here. Secondly, the significance level adopted was highly stringent, which may have caused inflation of type II errors. In spite of these limitations, it was possible to demonstrate that a well-characterized chromosome region affecting human and taurine cattle stature also associates with BW in a zebu breed. The release of a Bos primigenius indicus reference genome assembly, as well as the application of re-sequencing and replication studies would help improve resolution to narrow down the genomic region as close as possible to the true causative variants.

                                  Conclusions

                                  This study is believed to be the first genome-wide association study applying a high-density SNP panel to identify putative chromosome regions affecting birth weight in zebu cattle. The findings presented, which are strongly supported by the literature, point to orthologous genes already known to affect growth- and stature-related traits in both humans and cattle, which may shelter ancient polymorphisms responsible for variation in those traits since before cattle subspecies divergence.

                                  Methods

                                  Estimated breeding values

                                  Estimated breeding values for BW were obtained from routine genetic evaluations using performance and pedigree data from the Aliança database [11], containing data from different commercial Nellore breeding programs, including more than 250 farms distributed across Brazil and Paraguay. The genetic evaluation for BW was calculated using a subset of that data that included 542,918 animals, born from 1985 to 2011, and distributed in approximately 5,000 distinct contemporary groups. These data were collected in 243 grazing-based herds in Brazil. Estimated breeding values were obtained using an animal model that included fixed effects for the age of dam at calving and contemporary group (defined as animals from the same herd, born in the same year and season, and belonging to the same management group at birth, and sex), as well as random effects that include direct additive genetic, maternal additive genetic, maternal permanent environmental and residual error effects. The variance ratios required to solve the mixed model equations were computed based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates of the variance components from previous studies in this population. Only EBVs of progeny-tested bulls whose accuracy (i.e., square root of reliability, calculated based on prediction error variance estimates) was ≥ 0.50 were used for sample collection and genotyping (described later). The majority of the bulls were used under artificial insemination service.

                                  Genotyping, informativeness, and quality assurance

                                  A total of 654 progeny-tested Nellore bulls were genotyped with the Illumina® BovineHD Genotyping BeadChip assay, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Genotype calls (i.e. successfully determined genotypes) were defined as genotypes with GenCall Scores greater than 0.70, using the validated standard cluster file provided by the manufacturer. As chromosomes X, Y and mtDNA present different mode of inheritance from the rest of the genome, only autosomal markers with unique genomic coordinates were included into the analyses. After this initial screening, potential duplicated samples were determined by calculating the proportion of alleles identical by state (IBS) shared between all pairs of individuals. Any pair of samples with IBS ≥ 0.95 for 2,000 randomly sampled markers was considered unexpected duplicates, and resulted in the exclusion of both members of the pair. Individual SNPs were removed from the dataset if they did not exhibit: 1) minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than or equal to 0.02, 2) Fisher’s exact test P-value for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) greater than or equal to 1 × 10-5 (i.e. extremely deviating from HWE, suggesting potential genotyping error) or 3) Call rate (CRSNP) of at least 98%. After the SNP pruning, individuals exhibiting call rate (CRIND) below 90% were also removed. These procedures and many others described later were performed in the R v2.15.0 environment [40], using combinations of functions from the R base, locally developed scripts, and the GenABEL v1.7-2 package [41].

                                  Assessment of population substructure

                                  Sires genotyped in this study were known to belong to one of two major breeding program subgroups in the Aliança database [11] that have different selection objectives. One group emphasizes selection for weaning and yearling weight (subgroup 1) and the other emphasizes selection for fertility and carcass traits (subgroup 2). Thus, genetic stratification was expected and therefore population substructure was evaluated by performing a Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA). Pair-wise genomic kinship coefficients for all subjects under study were calculated first, following [42, 43]:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ1_HTML.gif
                                  (1)

                                  Where http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_IEq2_HTML.gif is the estimated genomic kinship between individuals i and j, L is the total number of loci used for the calculation, p l is the reference allele frequency for locus l, and g l,i and g l,j are the locus l genotypes for individuals i and j, respectively (coded as 0, 1 or 2 reference alleles). Calculations were based on 10,000 randomly sampled markers using GenABEL [41]. The calculated genomic kinship coefficients within the yielded n x n symmetric matrix (where n is the total number of samples) were then transformed to squared Euclidean distances, and the dissimilarities between the subjects within the matrix were captured in n-1 dimensional spaces of n observations (eigenvectors), via classical multidimensional scaling [44].

                                  A clustering analysis was applied to the two eigenvectors that explained the largest proportion of the data variance using the k-means algorithm [45] implemented in R[40]. Individuals were clustered into 2 groups, and the association between the prior information on breeding program and the k-means clustering results was tested using Pearson’s χ2 with Yates’ continuity correction in order to see if the algorithm could reproduce the known breeding programs subgroups. Additionally, an F-test for homogeneity of variance between subpopulations and a t-test for difference between subpopulation means, defining subpopulations either as k-means assignments or breeding program of origin, was performed to determine if there was confounding due to stratification.

                                  Association analysis

                                  In order to reduce computation time, the ideas of [46] were abstracted and a three-step association analysis was performed. In the first step, a linear regression using the weighted least squares method with weights equal to the squared accuracy (i.e., reliability) of the EBVs was applied. By weighting the EBVs by their respective accuracies, the uncertainty around the estimates was taken into account when estimating the regression parameters. The following model was fitted:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ2_HTML.gif
                                  (2)
                                  Where yi is the EBV of sire i, μ is the overall mean, X ij is value i (corresponding to sire i) in the eigenvector j calculated in the PCoA, β j is the estimated effect of eigenvector j, and ϵ i is the residual effect for animal j. Only eigenvectors significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with the dependent variable, as assessed by Pearson correlations, were included in the model. Next, the residuals were obtained from the fitted model in (2):
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ3_HTML.gif
                                  (3)
                                  and had their homoskedasticity and normality tested by using the studentized Breusch-Pagan test and the Shapiro-Wilk test, respectively. Then, these residuals were used as the new dependent variable for a single-marker linear regression:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ4_HTML.gif
                                  (4)
                                  Where β g is the marker regression coefficient (i.e., the allele substitution effect of the SNP) and g i is the genotype (0, 1 or 2) of the sire i. For each SNP, β g and its respective standard error (SE g ) were estimated using ordinary least squares. The association between the SNP and the trait was assessed via a test statistic, calculated as:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ5_HTML.gif
                                  (5)
                                  The test statistics are assumed to asymptotically follow a χ2 distribution with one degree of freedom under the null hypothesis. To assess the validity of this assumption, the deviation of the distribution of the test statistics from the expected theoretical quantiles was examined via 1) a quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot, and 2) calculation of the inflation/deflation factor:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ6_HTML.gif
                                  (6)
                                  If λ < 1.1, the inflation was considered acceptable, and the Genomic Control (GC) correction was applied to adjust for that inflation [47]. Then, P-values were derived from the χ2 cumulative distribution function for the corrected test statistics. Finally, markers within the smallest 0.1% P-value percentile (i.e., most significant) were considered for re-analysis with the full model:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ7_HTML.gif
                                  (7)

                                  The EBVs were again weighted by their respective accuracies. The conservative Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing (α=0.05/N, where N is the number of tests, i.e., number of SNPs) was used to reject the null hypothesis (β g = 0, i.e. there is no association between the SNP and the EBVs), which resulted in an adjusted significance of α = 1.15 × 10-7.

                                  Exploratory view of significant SNPs

                                  For any peak crossing the Bonferroni significance threshold, the estimated regression parameters were reported. For the most significant SNP, a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the estimated allele substitution effect size ( http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_IEq3_HTML.gif ) was calculated, and the percentage of the EBV variance explained was calculated as:
                                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_Equ8_HTML.gif
                                  (8)

                                  Where p and q are the allele frequencies and S 2 is the sample EBVs variance. The upper and lower limits of the estimated 95% CI for http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_IEq4_HTML.gif were used to derive a 95% CI for % http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2156-14-52/MediaObjects/12863_2012_1119_IEq5_HTML.gif .

                                  The genomic region containing the most significant SNP of a peak was explored by inspecting a 1 Mb window around the location of this SNP using the BioMart tool and the Ensembl genes 69 database [48] to interrogate 500 kb to each side of the marker using the UMD v3.1 assembly. The cattle QTLdb database [49] was also examined to find out if the significant SNP mapped against any previously described bovine QTL. Additionally, the alignments of the UMD v3.1 assembly sequence of the 1 Mb window against the human (Homo sapiens, GRCh37 assembly), pig (Sus scrofa, Sscrofa10.2 assembly) and mouse (Mus musculus, GRCm38 assembly) genome builds were inspected in the Ensembl Comparative genomics alignments and Comparative genomics synteny tools in order to determine if any homologous genes were present in the putative region.

                                  Abbreviations

                                  BW: 

                                  Birth weight

                                  EBV: 

                                  Estimated breeding value

                                  SNP: 

                                  Single nucleotide polymorphism

                                  BTA: 

                                  Bos primigenius taurus

                                  GWAS: 

                                  Genome-wide association study

                                  IBS: 

                                  Identity by state

                                  MAF: 

                                  Minor allele frequency

                                  HWE: 

                                  Hardy-weinberg equilibrium

                                  PCoA: 

                                  Principal coordinates analysis

                                  Q-Q plot: 

                                  quantile-quantile plot

                                  GC: 

                                  Genomic control

                                  CI: 

                                  Confidence interval

                                  HSA: 

                                  Homo sapiens

                                  SSC: 

                                  Sus scrofa

                                  MMU: 

                                  Mus musculus

                                  QTL: 

                                  Quantitative trait locus

                                  CHILLP8: 

                                  Rump fat thickness measured at the P8 position

                                  QTN: 

                                  Quantitative trait nucleotide

                                  LD: 

                                  Linkage disequilibrium

                                  Declarations

                                  Acknowledgements

                                  We thank Guilherme Penteado Coelho Filho and Daniel Biluca for technical assistance in sample acquisition. This research was supported by: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) - process 560922/2010-8 and 483590/2010-0; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) - process 2011/16643-2 and 2010/52030-2; Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ008196), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

                                  Mention of trade name proprietary product or specified equipment in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the authors or their respective institutions.

                                  Authors’ Affiliations

                                  (1)
                                  Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal
                                  (2)
                                  GenSys Consultores Associados
                                  (3)
                                  Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Livestock Sciences, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences
                                  (4)
                                  Centre for Reproduction and Genomics, AgResearch, Invermay
                                  (5)
                                  ARS-USDA - Agricultural Research Service - United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory
                                  (6)
                                  United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory
                                  (7)
                                  Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph
                                  (8)
                                  Bioinformatics and Animal Genomics Laboratory, Embrapa Dairy Cattle
                                  (9)
                                  School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland
                                  (10)
                                  School of Rural and Environmental Science, University of New England
                                  (11)
                                  Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária de Araçatuba, UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba

                                  References

                                  1. Boligon AA, Albuquerque LG, Mercadante MEZ, Lôbo RB: Herdabilidades e correlações entre pesos do nascimento à idade adulta em rebanhos da raça Nelore. Rev. Bras. Zootec 2009,38(12): 2320–2326.View Article
                                  2. Meyer K: Estimates of genetic parameters for mature weight of Australian beef cows and its relationship to early growth and skeletal measures. Livest Prod Sci 1995, 44:125–137.View Article
                                  3. Bourdon RM, Brinks JS: Genetic, environmental and phenotypic relationships among gestation length, birth weight, growth traits and age at first calving in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1982,55(3): 543–553.PubMed
                                  4. Eriksson S, Näsholm A, Johansson K, Philipsson J: Genetic parameters for calving difficulty, stillbirth, and birth weight for Hereford and Charolais at first and later parities. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:375–383.PubMed
                                  5. Phocas F, Bloch C, Chapelle P, Bécherel F, Renand G, Ménissier F: Developing a breeding objective for a French purebred beef cattle selection programme. Livest Prod Sci 1998, 57:49–65.View Article
                                  6. Gutiérrez JP, Goyache F, Fernández I, Alvarez I, Royo LJ: Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight, and weaning weight in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed. J Anim Sci 2007, 85:69–75.PubMedView Article
                                  7. Cook BR, Tess MW, Kress DD: Effects of selection strategies using heifer pelvic area and sire birth weight expected progeny difference on dystocia in first-calf heifers. J Anim Sci 1993, 71:602–607.PubMed
                                  8. Johanson JM, Berger PJ: Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2003,86(11): 3745–3755.PubMedView Article
                                  9. Nobre PR, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Bertrand JK, Silva LO, Lopes OS: Analyses of growth curves of Nellore cattle by multiple-trait and random regression models. J Anim Sci 2003, 81:918–926.PubMed
                                  10. Albuqueque LG, Meyer K: Estimates of direct and maternal genetic effects for weights from birth to 600 days of age in Nelore cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 2001, 118:83–92.View Article
                                  11. Aliança: Sumário de touros 2011 Aliança Nelore. Porto Alegre, Brazil: GenSys Consultores Associados; 2011.
                                  12. Spelman RJ, Huisman AE, Singireddy SR, Coppieters W, Arranz J, Georges M, Garrick DJ: Short communication: quantitative trait loci analysis on 17 nonproduction traits in the New Zealand dairy population. J Dairy Sci 1999,82(11): 2514–2516.PubMedView Article
                                  13. Kneeland J, Li C, Basarab J, Snelling WM, Benkel B, Murdoch B, Hansen C, Moore SS: Identification and fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth traits on bovine chromosomes 2, 6, 14, 19, 21, and 23 within one commercial line of Bos taurus . J Anim Sci 2004,82(12): 3405–3414.PubMed
                                  14. Maltecca C, Weigel KA, Khatib H, Cowan M, Bagnato A: Whole-genome scan for quantitative trait loci associated with birth weight, gestation length and passive immune transfer in a Holstein x Jersey crossbred population. Anim Genet 2009,40(1): 27–34.PubMedView Article
                                  15. McClure MC, Morsci NS, Schnabel RD, Kim JW, Yao P, Rolf MM, McKay SD, Gregg SJ, Chapple RH, Northcutt SL, Taylor JF: A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle. Anim Genet 2010,41(6): 597–607.PubMedView Article
                                  16. Cole JB, Wiggans GR, Ma L, Sonstegard TS, Lawlor TJ, Crooker BA, Van Tassell CP, Yang J, Wang S, Matukumalli LK, Da Y: Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:408.PubMedView Article
                                  17. Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KC, Gibbs RA, Muzny DM, Weinstock GM, Adelson DL, Eichler EE, Elnitski L, Guigó R, Hamernik DL, Kappes SM, Lewin HA, Lynn DJ, Nicholas FW, Reymond A, Rijnkels M, Skow LC, Zdobnov EM, Schook L, Womack J, Alioto T, Antonarakis SE, Astashyn A, Chapple CE, Chen HC, Chrast J, Câmara F, Ermolaeva O, Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium, et al.: The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 2009,324(5926): 522–528.PubMedView Article
                                  18. Gibbs RA, Taylor JF, Van Tassell CP, Barendse W, Eversole KA, Gill CA, Green RD, Hamernik DL, Kappes SM, Lien S, Matukumalli LK, McEwan JC, Nazareth LV, Schnabel RD, Weinstock GM, Wheeler DA, Ajmone-Marsan P, Boettcher PJ, Caetano AR, Garcia JF, Hanotte O, Mariani P, Skow LC, Sonstegard TS, Williams JL, Diallo B, Hailemariam L, Martinez ML, Morris CA, Bovine HapMap Consortium, et al.: Science. 2009,324(5926): 528–532.PubMedView Article
                                  19. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O’Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP: Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One 2009,4(4): e5350.PubMedView Article
                                  20. Snelling WM, Allan MF, Keele JW, Kuehn LA, McDaneld T, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, Thallman RM, Bennett GL: Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2010,88(3): 837–848.PubMedView Article
                                  21. Pausch H, Flisikowski K, Jung S, Emmerling R, Edel C, Götz KU, Fries R: Genome-wide association study identifies two major loci affecting calving ease and growth-related traits in cattle. Genetics 2011, 187:289–297.PubMedView Article
                                  22. Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Bolormaa S, Goddard ME: Polymorphic regions affecting human height also control stature in cattle. Genetics 2011, 187:981–984.PubMedView Article
                                  23. Nishimura S, Watanabe T, Mizoshita K, Tatsuda K, Fujita T, Watanabe N, Sugimoto Y, Takasuga A: Genome-wide association study identified three major QTL for carcass weight including the PLAG1-CHCHD7 QTN for stature in Japanese Black cattle. BMC Genet 2012, 13:40.PubMedView Article
                                  24. Gudbjartsson DF, Walters GB, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Halldorsson BV, Zusmanovich P, Sulem P, Thorlacius S, Gylfason A, Steinberg S, Helgadottir A, Ingason A, Steinthorsdottir V, Olafsdottir EJ, Olafsdottir GH, Jonsson T, Borch-Johnsen K, Hansen T, Andersen G, Jorgensen T, Pedersen O, Aben KK, Witjes JA, Swinkels DW, den Heijer M, Franke B, Verbeek AL, Becker DM, Yanek LR, Becker LC, et al.: Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height. Nat Genet 2008, 40:609–615.PubMedView Article
                                  25. Weedon MN, Lango H, Lindgren CM, Wallace C, Evans DM, Mangino M, Freathy RM, Perry JR, Stevens S, Hall AS, Samani NJ, Shields B, Prokopenko I, Farrall M, Dominiczak A, Johnson T, Bergmann S, Beckmann JS, Vollenweider P, Waterworth DM, Mooser V, Palmer CN, Morris AD, Ouwehand WH, Zhao JH, Li S, Loos RJ, Diabetes Genetics Initiative; Wellcome Trust CaseControl Consortium, et al.: Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height. Nat Genet 2008, 40:575–583.PubMedView Article
                                  26. Lettre G, Jackson AU, Gieger C, Schumacher FR, Berndt SI, Sanna S, Eyheramendy S, Voight BF, Butler JL, Guiducci C, Illig T, Hackett R, Heid IM, Jacobs KB, Lyssenko V, Uda M, Boehnke M, Chanock SJ, Groop LC, Hu FB, Isomaa B, Kraft P, Peltonen L, Salomaa V, Diabetes Genetics Initiative; FUSION; KORA; Prostate, Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial; Nurses’ HealthStudy; SardiNIA, et al.: Identification of ten loci associated withheight highlights new biological pathways in human growth. Nat Genet 2008, 40:584–591.PubMedView Article
                                  27. Karim L, Takeda H, Lin L, Druet T, Arias JA, Baurain D, Cambisano N, Davis SR, Farnir F, Grisart B, Harris BL, Keehan MD, Littlejohn MD, Spelman RJ, Georges M, Coppieters W: Variants modulating the expression of a chromosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine stature. Nat Genet 2011, 43:405–413.PubMedView Article
                                  28. Littlejohn M, Grala T, Sanders K, Walker C, Waghorn G, Macdonald K, Coppieters W, Georges M, Spelman R, Hillerton E, Davisand S, Snell R: Genetic variation in PLAG1 associates with early life body weight and peripubertal weight and growth in Bos taurus . Anim Genet 2012,43(5): 591–594.PubMedView Article
                                  29. Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL: Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol 2009, 41:55.PubMedView Article
                                  30. Cole JB, VanRaden PM, O’Connell JR, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Wiggans GR: Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:2931–2946.PubMedView Article
                                  31. Fortes MRS, Lehnert SA, Bolormaa S, Reich C, Fordyce G, Corbet NJ, Whan V, Hawken RJ, Reverter A: Finding genes for economically important traits: Brahman cattle puberty. Animal Production Science 2012, 52:143–150.View Article
                                  32. Fortes MR, Reverter A, Hawken RJ, Bolormaa S, Lehnert SA: Candidate genes associated with testicular development, sperm quality, and hormone levels of inhibin, luteinizing hormone, and insulin-like growth factor 1 in Brahman bulls. BiolReprod 2012,87(3): 58.View Article
                                  33. Hawken RJ, Zhang YD, Fortes MRS, Collis E, Barris WC, Corbet NJ, Williams PJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Walkley JRW, Barendse W, Johnston DJ, Prayaga KC, Tier B, Reverter A, Lehnert SA: Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2012, 90:1398–1410.PubMedView Article
                                  34. Lindholm-Perry AK, Kuehn LA, Smith TP, Ferrell CL, Jenkins TG, Freetly HC, Snelling WM: A region on BTA14 that includes the positional candidate genes LYPLA1, XKR4 and TMEM68 is associated with feed intake and growth phenotypes in cattle. Anim Genet 2012,43(2): 216–219.PubMedView Article
                                  35. Bolormaa S, Porto Neto LR, Zhang YD, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Goddard ME, Barendse W: A genome-wide association study of meat and carcass traits in Australian cattle. J Anim Sci 2011,89(2): 297–309.
                                  36. Porto Neto LR, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Barendse W: Variation in the XKR4 gene was significantly associated with subcutaneous rump fat thickness in indicine and composite cattle. Anim Genet 2012,43(6): 785–789.PubMedView Article
                                  37. Lango Allen H, Estrada K, Lettre G, Berndt SI, Weedon MN, Rivadeneira F, Willer CJ, Jackson AU, Vedantam S, Raychaudhuri S, Ferreira T, Wood AR, Weyant RJ, Segrè AV, Speliotes EK, Wheeler E, Soranzo N, Park JH, Yang J, Gudbjartsson D, Heard-Costa NL, Randall JC, Qi L, Vernon Smith A, Mägi R, Pastinen T, Liang L, Heid IM, Luan J, Thorleifsson G, et al.: Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature 2010, 467:832–838.PubMedView Article
                                  38. Van Dyck F, Declercq J, Braem CV, Van de Ven WJ: PLAG1, the prototype of the PLAG gene family: versatility in tumour development. Int J Oncol 2007, 30:765–774.PubMed
                                  39. Hensen K, Braem C, Declercq J, Van Dyck F, Dewerchin M, Fiette L, Denef C, Van de Ven WJM: Targeted disruption of the murine PLAG1 proto-oncogene causes growth retardation and reduced fertility. Dev Growth Differ 2004, 46:459–470.PubMedView Article
                                  40. R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008. http://​www.​R-project.​org
                                  41. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, Van Duijn CM: GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 2007,23(10): 1294–1296.PubMedView Article
                                  42. Amin N, Van Duijn CM, Aulchenko YS: A genomic background based method for association analysis in related individuals. PLoS One 2007, 2:e1274.PubMedView Article
                                  43. Astle W, Balding DJ: Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Stat Sci 2009,24(4): 451–471.View Article
                                  44. Mardia KV: Some properties of classical multi-dimensional scaling. Communications on Statistics-Theory and Methods 1978,A7(13): 1233–1241.View Article
                                  45. Hartigan JA, Wong MA: A K-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics 1979, 28:100–108.View Article
                                  46. Aulchenko YS, de Koning D-J, Haley C: Genomewide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genomewide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis. Genetics 2007, 177:577–585.PubMedView Article
                                  47. Devlin B, Roeder K: Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 1999, 55:997–1004.PubMedView Article
                                  48. Kinsella RJ, Kähäri A, Haider S, Zamora J, Proctor G, Spudich G, Almeida-King J, Staines D, Derwent P, Kerhornou A, Kersey P, Flicek P: Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database (Oxford) 2011, 2011:Bar030.View Article
                                  49. Hu ZL, Park CA, Wu XL, Reecy JM: Animal QTLdb: an improved database tool for livestock animal QTL/association data dissemination in the post-genome era. Nucleic Acids Res 2012. in press

                                  Copyright

                                  © Utsunomiya et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                                  This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                                  Advertisement