Skip to main content

Table 1 Setup for the simulations with a fully informative marker. 800 F2 individuals were simulated with phenotype equal to the sum of the additive QTL effect, dominance QTL effect and residual effect

From: Separation of base allele and sampling term effects gives new insights in variance component QTL analysis

Percentage of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTLa

Additive effect (a)b

Dominance effect (d)

Residual variance

5% additive QTL

3.162

0

95

10% additive QTL

4.472

0

90

20% additive QTL

6.324

0

80

20% add. QTL and 10% dominance

6.324

3.162

70

  1. a Expected additive QTL variance σ v 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacqWFdpWCdaqhaaWcbaGaemODayhabaGaeGOmaidaaaaa@310A@ equal to 0.5a2
  2. b The two alternative homozygous genotypes had additive effect a and -a in the simulated data