Table 2 Chemical composition of 13 tomato introgression lines residual biomass
Introgression lines | Total cellulose g 100 g−1 of dry weight |  | Crystalline cellulose | Hemicellulose | Pectin |  | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL 2–5 | 51.5 ± 2.3 | c |   4.6 ± 0.8 | de | 1.9 ± 0.3 | g | 7.3 ± 0.3 | c |
IL 2–6 | 51.7 ± 3.1 | c | 11.5 ± 2.4 | ad | 5.6 ± 1.5 | ab | 5.8 ± 0.5 | d |
IL 3–1 | 41.0 ± 1.9 | fg |   3.5 ± 1.0 | e | 2.9 ± 1.2 | dg | 2.6 ± 0.7 | i |
IL 4–1 | 40.7 ± 2.1 | fg |   5.4 ± 1.2 | ce | 2.5 ± 0.4 | fg | 5.2 ± 0.3 | ef |
IL 4–3 | 55.9 ± 2.2 | a | 17.6 ± 2.6 | a | 6.0 ± 0.9 | a | 3.4 ± 0.6 | h |
IL 6–2 | 44.6 ± 2.3 | e | 13.2 ± 2.6 | ab | 4.0 ± 0.9 | cf | 5.1 ± 0.4 | ef |
IL 6–3 | 55.8 ± 1.9 | a | 12.5 ± 2.4 | ac | 4.4 ± 1.5 | bd | 2.1 ± 0.7 | i |
IL 7–2 | 41.6 ± 1.7 | fg | 14.2 ± 2.5 | ab | 4.2 ± 1.4 | be | 3.2 ± 0.6 | h |
IL 9–3 | 48.2 ± 3.3 | d |   9.4 ± 1.3 | be | 4.1 ± 0.4 | bf | 2.0 ± 0.3 | i |
IL 10–2 | 46.1 ± 2.2 | e | 11.0 ± 2.2 | ae | 4.8 ± 0.4 | ac | 5.6 ± 0.5 | de |
IL 10–3 | 42.4 ± 2.4 | fg |   4.8 ± 1.1 | de | 2.8 ± 0.4 | dg | 10.1 ± 0.5 | a |
IL 11–3 | 50.1 ± 2.5 | c | 13.9 ± 2.9 | ab | 4.1 ± 0.3 | be | 4.6 ± 0.1 | fg |
IL 12–4 | 53.6 ± 2.9 | b |   3.6 ± 0.8 | e | 2.7 ± 0.4 | eg | 9.3 ± 0.3 | b |
M82 (control) | 38.7 ± 3.0 | g | 15.2 ± 3.4 | ab | 5.2 ± 1.0 | ac | 4.0 ± 0.2 | g |