Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic statistics (LS Means ± Standard Error) for all traits analysed

From: Quantifying the genetic parameters of feed efficiency in juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus

Trait1

N

Mean ± SD

Min

Max

CV (%)

LS Means ± SE

Males

Females

Growth traits and feed intake

 BWi

1029

22.4 ± 5.64

7.74

40.15

25.1

23.4 ± 0.17a

21.01 ± 0.18b

 BWf

993

31.9 ± 8.26

10.04

56.61

25.9

33.7 ± 0.26a

29.4 ± 0.27b

 TGCLOSS

997

− 0.036 ± 0.01

− 0.068

0.00

24.9

− 0.036 ± 0.001a

− 0.036 ± 0.001a

 TGCCOMP

995

0.282 ± 0.049

0.024

0.426

17.5

0.296 ± 0.002a

0.265 ± 0.002b

 BWG

981

9.33 ± 3.14

0.76

18.3

33.7

10.3 ± 0.11a

8.35 ± 0.12b

 TGCFI

993

0.16 ± 0.04

0.03

0.28

22.5

0.17 ± 0.001a

0.15 ± 0.002b

 FI

949

8.35 ± 2.42

1.80

15.6

29.0

9.05 ± 0.09a

8.17 ± 0.09b

Feed efficiency traits

 FCR

953

0.94 ± 0.21

0.47

1.55

22.1

0.91 ± 0.01a

1.01 ± 0.01b

 RFI

935

0 ± 1.53

−4.41

4.40

NR

−0.40 ± 0.06a

0.09 ± 0.07b

  1. 1BWi and BWf: BW at the beginning and at the end of the FI period (in g), respectively; TGCLOSS Loss of weight during the fasting period estimated as thermal growth coefficient during the fasting period, TGCCOMP Gain of weight during the feeding period estimated as the thermal growth coefficient during the refeeding period, BWG Body weight gain during the FI period (g), TGCFI Thermal growth coefficient during the FI period, FI Feed intake (g), FCR Feed conversion ratio (g.g− 1), RFI Residual feed intake (g)
  2. NR CV are not relevant in these cases
  3. a-bLS Means within row with different superscript are significantly different (P-value < 0.05)