Skip to main content

Characterization, identification and expression profiling of genome-wide R-genes in melon and their putative roles in bacterial fruit blotch resistance

Abstract

Background

Bacterial fruit blotch (BFB), a disease caused by Acidovorax citrulli, results in significant economic losses in melon. The causal QTLs and genes for resistance to this disease have yet to be identified. Resistance (R)-genes play vital roles in resistance to plant diseases. Since the complete genome sequence of melon is available and genome-wide identification of R-genes has been performed for this important crop, comprehensive expression profiling may lead to the identification of putative candidate genes that function in the response to BFB.

Results

We identified melon accessions that are resistant and susceptible to BFB through repeated bioassays and characterized all 70 R-genes in melon, including their gene structures, chromosomal locations, domain organizations, motif distributions, and syntenic relationships. Several disease resistance-related domains were identified, including NBS, TIR, LRR, CC, RLK, and DUF domains, and the genes were categorized based on the domains of their encoded proteins. In addition, we profiled the expression patterns of the genes in melon accessions with contrasting levels of BFB resistance at 12 h, 1 d, 3 d, and 6 d after inoculation with A. citrulli. Six R-genes exhibited consistent expression patterns (MELO3C023441, MELO3C016529, MELO3C022157, MELO3C022146, MELO3C025518, and MELO3C004303), with higher expression levels in the resistant vs. susceptible accession.

Conclusion

We identified six putative candidate R-genes against BFB in melon. Upon functional validation, these genes could be targeted for manipulation via breeding and biotechnological approaches to improve BFB resistance in melon in the future.

Background

Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a highly diversified eudicot diploid (2n = 2x = 24) cucurbitaceous crop with a genome size of approximately 375 Mb [1]. Melon is economically important and ranks as the 9th most cultivated horticultural crop in terms of worldwide production [2, 3]. Its sweet, musky-flavored, fleshy fruit is rich in vitamins, minerals, and health-promoting antioxidants, including ascorbic acid, carotene, folic acid, and potassium [4,5,6].

Melon is vulnerable to various biotic and abiotic stresses [7, 8]. Bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) is a devastating disease of melon caused by Acidovorax citrulli, an aerobic, mesophilic, gram-negative, rod-shaped seed-borne bacterium belonging to the beta subdivision of the Proteobacteria [9]. BFB has been reported in many countries and poses a serious threat to melon, as well as other cucurbit crops including prickly paddy melon, citron melon, cucumber, pumpkin, squash, several types of gourds, and watermelon [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. BFB causes water-soaked lesions to form on cotyledons and leaves, leading to collapse and death. The lesions on fruits are small (~ 1 cm diameter), irregular, and often sunken, progressing through the rind. The lesions then become necrotic, causing decay and cracks in the fruit. These lesions expose the plant to secondary infections and cause A. citrulli to colonize the pulp, eventually allowing the seed to become contaminated [17]. BFB causes 80–100% losses in production under favorable environmental situations, especially during the rainy season and in regions with highly fluctuating temperatures [18, 19]. Although BFB is of great concern to farmers and seed companies, strategies for managing this disease are limited; chemical control measures are environmentally hazardous and only partially effective, and resistant commercial cultivars have not yet been developed [13, 20,21,22,23,24]. Host resistance represents the most cost effective and environmentally friendly approach for managing BFB [12]. However, no QTL or R-gene for this disease has thus far been identified in melon. Efforts to develop BFB-resistant melon genotypes would be greatly enhanced by the identification of functional R-genes.

Genomic studies have provided insight into the evolution of R-genes, which play important roles in the plant immune system in response to various pathogens and insects [25]. Plant R-genes encode proteins containing domains such as Nucleotide-binding site (NBS), Leucine-rich repeat (LRR), Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR), Coiled-coil (CC), and Receptor-like kinase (RLK) domains [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. These domains are involved in pathogen recognition, signaling, and plant innate immunity responses [26, 27, 29, 31,32,33,34,35]. R-genes have been identified in the genomes of plant species including watermelon [36], cucumber [25], rice [37, 38], Chinese cabbage [39], maize [40], wheat [41], Arabidopsis thaliana [42], and apple [43].

An improved assembly and annotation of the melon (Cucumis melo L.) reference genome identified 70 R-genes in melon [1, 44, 45]. In the current study, we investigated the expression patterns of R-genes throughout the melon genome in response to the BFB-causing bacterium A. citrulli in melon accessions contrasting in BFB resistance. The aim of this study was to identify putative candidate R-genes that confer resistance to BFB in melon.

Results

Genome-wide melon R-genes and their chromosomal distribution

The latest version (v3.6.1) of the whole-genome sequence of the melon double haploid line DHL90 was constructed using an improved assembly and annotation. This sequence contains 70 R-genes [1, 44]. We retrieved genomic information for these 70 R-genes, including their coding sequences and deduced amino acid sequences, from the cucurbit genome database (http://cucurbitgenomics.org). Detailed genomic information about these R-genes, including their locations on chromosomes, is provided in Table 1. Chromosomal mapping of the 70 R-genes revealed that they are distributed across all 12 melon chromosomes, with 1 to 12 genes per chromosome (Fig. 1; Table 1). Chromosome 9 (Chr09) contains the most R-genes (12), followed by Chr12 and Chr01 (10 and 9 genes, respectively). Chr11 contains the fewest R-genes (2), followed by Chr03 and Chr07 (3 genes each). The genes appear to be clustered, particularly in the telomere regions of chromosomes such as chr09, chr01, and chr04 (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Information about R-genes throughout the melon genome including chromosomal positions, lengths, and annotated descriptions
Fig. 1
figure1

Chromosomal distribution of R-genes in melon genome-wide. The map was drawn using MapChart (v2.32)

Gene structures, domain organizations, and motif distribution of R-genes in melon

We analyzed the exon–intron structures of all 70 melon R-genes by comparing their coding sequences with the corresponding genomic sequences using the online tool GSDS2.0 (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). The highest number of exons (22) was in the gene MELO3C013803, followed by 18 in MELO3C007367 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Among the 70 R-genes, 21 were mono-exonic, while 12 and 4 genes were bi- and tri-exonic, respectively.

We analyzed the conserved domains of the 70 melon R-genes using the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi. We detected several disease resistance-related domains encoded by these R-genes, such as NB-ARC (Nucleotide-binding adaptor shared by APAF-1, R proteins, and CED-4), LRR (Leucine-rich repeat), TIR (Toll/interleukin-1 receptor), CC (Coiled-coil), and RLK (Receptor-like kinase) domains. The R-genes were grouped into different classes based on the presence of the following conserved domains in their encoded proteins: (i) LRR, (ii) NBS-LRR, (iii) TIR, (iv) TIR-NBS-LRR, (v) NB-ARC, (vi) CC, (vii) RLK, and (viii) DUF (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Thirty-seven genes encoded proteins with only LRR domains, seven encoded proteins with NB-ARC domains, two encoded proteins with TIR domains, and only one encodes a protein with a CC domain (Table 2). Twelve genes encoded three domains (TIR, NBS, and LRR), including MELO3C004288, MELO3C004289, MELO3C004311, MELO3C004313, MELO3C022154, MELO3C022152, MELO3C022146, MELO3C022145, MELO3C022144, MELO3C004309, MELO3C004259, and MELO3C004301. A list of the genes and a description of their domains is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 R-genes throughout the melon genome categorized based on functional disease resistance-related domains

We analyzed the conserved motifs of these 70 R-genes using the MEME Suite (http://meme-uite.org/tools/meme). A total of 20 conserved motifs were detected in these 70 R-genes, each comprising more than 14 amino acids. The greatest number of motifs was identified in the LRR domain-encoding gene MELO3C002394, whereas the fewest were detected in MELO3C029505, MELO3C023580, and MELO3C006801, which are LRR-, CC-, and DUF-domain-encoding genes, respectively. The distribution of these conserved motifs, along with the motif sequences, is described in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure2

Conserved motifs in the R-genes of melon. Motifs are indicated by different colored rectangles. Motif sequences are provided in the legend

Microsynteny of melon R-genes with genes in the watermelon and cucumber genomes

We analyzed the microsyntenic relationships of the 70 R-genes from melon (Cucumis melo) with genes in the watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) genomes using the Circos tool. Most R-genes from melon were homologous to R-genes from watermelon and cucumber. However, watermelon R-genes on chromosomes 11 and 12 lacked homologues in melon (Fig. 3). By contrast, all 70 R-genes in melon had homologues in all chromosomes of cucumber.

Fig. 3
figure3

Microsynteny analysis of all 70 melon R-genes with those of watermelon and cucumber. Melon, watermelon, and cucumber chromosomes are shown in orange, blue, and green, respectively. The diagram was drawn using the web-based tool Circos (http://circos.ca/software/download/) circos-0.69-9.tgz

Expression profiles of melon R-genes in response to A. citrulli inoculation

We investigated the expression patterns of the 70 melon R-genes in the leaves of resistant and susceptible melon seedlings at 12 h, 1 d, 3 d, and 6 d of inoculation with A. citrulli strain NIHHS15–280 via qRT-PCR. Several genes showed differential expression in the resistant vs. susceptible accession at different time points. A general trend of low expression for these genes was observed in the susceptible accession (Fig. 4). On the contrary, most of the genes were significantly induced within 12 h of A. citrulli infection in the resistant accession and showed a general increase in expression in this accession. By contrast, in the susceptible accession, the expression of these genes fluctuated, with little or no expression at the 12 h time point. Heatmap analysis of the expression data identified a sub-cluster of six genes (MELO3C023441, MELO3C016529, MELO3C022157, MELO3C022146, MELO3C025518, and MELO3C004303) that showed contrasting trends of expression in the resistant vs. susceptible accession, with progressively increasing expression after inoculation with A. citrulli in the resistant but not the susceptible accession (Fig. 4). Extensive analysis of these six genes indicated that the expression of four genes (MELO3C023441, MELO3C004303, MELO3C022146, and MELO3C025518) increased in the resistant accession with increasing time after inoculation with A. citrulli (Fig. 5). In the susceptible accession, the expressions of these genes were very low in the initial hours after inoculation and did not show significant increase over time after inoculation. In the resistant accession, the expression of these four genes (MELO3C023441, MELO3C004303, MELO3C022146, and MELO3C025518) peaked at 6 d after inoculation, with levels approximately 8-, 8-, 10-, and 7-fold those of the control samples, respectively. In the susceptible accession, the expression of two of these genes did not increase in response to A. citrulli inoculation, whereas the expression of two genes (MELO3C022157 and MELO3C016529) generally increased in response to inoculation, but to a lesser extent than in the resistant accession. The expression of these two genes increased until 3 d after inoculation (5-fold in MELO3C016529 and 2.5-fold in MELO3C022157), followed by a decrease to their lowest levels at 6 d post inoculation (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure4

Heat map of the expression patterns of melon R-genes determined by qRT-PCR in BFB-resistant and -susceptible melon accessions at the indicated time points after inoculation with A. citrulli. The expression levels were normalized to that Actin (the expression levels of the Actin gene are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The values were obtained from the means of three biological replicates. Red and green represent the minimum and maximum values, respectively. The IDs of six putative R-genes are shown in pink on the right side of the figure. MELO3C002671 and MELO3C022447 were not expressed and are therefore not shown in the heatmap. The heat map was generated using the online tool Heatmapper (http://www.heatmapper.ca/expression/)

Fig. 5
figure5

Relative expression levels of six candidate R-genes in resistant and susceptible melon accessions at the indicated time points after inoculation with A. citrulli. Error bars represent standard errors of three individual observations. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences, as determined by Tukey’s pairwise comparison. Ct-control, h- hour, and d- day

Discussion

Here, we identified R-genes with putative roles in resistance to BFB disease in melon by profiling the genome-wide expression patterns of R-genes from melon in response to inoculation with A. citrulli. Disease resistance in plants involves the interaction between specific disease resistance (R)-genes in plants and avirulence (avr) genes of the pathogen which is known as gene-for-gene model [55, 56]. Most plant R-genes belong to a superfamily of genes encoding proteins with an NBS or LRR domain, an N-terminal TIR or CC domain, or an RLK/RLP domain [29, 57]. A meta-analysis of the 314 cloned plant R-genes revealed that 191 (61%) such genes are NBS-LRR genes and 60 (19%) genes are RLKs/RLPs [58]. NBS domains bind to and hydrolyze adenosine triphosphate (ATP) or guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and are involved in signaling; LRR domains are highly adaptable structural domains that are responsible for protein–protein interactions and play an important role in plant–pathogen recognition [59]; TIR domains provide pathogen specificity and plant defense responses, while CC domains are involved in pathogen recognition and signaling; and RLK domains play roles in signaling and plant defense responses.

In melon, four resistance gene homologue sequences were previously reported that contained 14 TIR-NBS-LRR genes [60, 61]. A study of the first complete genome sequence of melon identified 411 putative R-genes, including 161 RLKs, 110 RLP (receptor-like proteins) genes, 19 RLK-GNK2 (kinases containing an additional antifungal protein ginkbilobin-2 domain) genes, and 81 genes containing canonical resistance domains, such as NBS, LRR, and TIR domains [1]. Among these genes, 25 were homologous to Pto genes from tomato and 15 were homologous to Mlo genes from barley [62, 63]. After further improvements in the assembly and annotation of the melon (Cucumis melo L.) reference genome, 70 R-genes were ultimately identified in melon [44].

Our comprehensive in-silico analysis of the 70 melon R-genes revealed that they encode proteins with several disease resistance-related domains, including LRR, NBS, TIR, NB-ARC, CC, RLK, and DUF domains (Table 2). These genes are distributed across all melon chromosomes, and some are clustered in the telomeric regions of a few chromosomes (Fig. 1). The clustering of R-genes is an evolutionarily conserved defense mechanism in plants wherein recombination in closely located genes creates new motif combinations, which generates novel resistance specificities and broadens plant resistance to different diseases [42, 64]. R-gene clusters that provide resistance to multiple diseases have been reported for angular leaf spot, downy mildew, and anthracnose diseases in cucumber [65] and for blackleg, sclerotinia stem rot, and clubroot diseases in B. napus [66,67,68] and B. rapa [66]. In melon, a 1 Mb region on chromosome five contains the highest density of R-genes [69]. In addition, a cluster of 13 TNL genes is located in the same region as the melon Vat resistance gene [70], and another cluster of 7 TNL genes is located in the region harboring the Fom-1 resistance gene [71]. The Vat locus encodes a CC-NBS-LRR protein that confers resistance to aphid and aphid-mediated viruses in melon. The loss of two highly conserved LRRs is linked with susceptibility to these viruses [72]. In addition, the Fusarium wilt resistance locus Fom-2 is a TIR-NBS-LRR gene [73]. Expression patterns of the genome-wide R-genes are thus studied to identify any potential candidate genes against A. citrulli.

Six melon genes were highly expressed in the BFB-resistant accession. Of these genes, three (MELO3C016529, MELO3C022157, and MELO3C022146) are TNL genes, two (MELO3C023441 and MELO3C025518) are LRR genes, and one (MELO3C005452) is an NBS-LRR gene (Table 2). These genes were highly expressed at 6 d after inoculation (Fig. 5), which is consistent with our observation that BFB symptoms first appeared at 6–7 d in a susceptible accession [74].

Expression analysis upon infection with A. citrulli indicated a general trend of low expression for most R-genes in susceptible accession. By contrast, a set of genes including MELO3C023441, MELO3C004303, MELO3C022146, and MELO3C025518 were expressed at much higher levels, and MELO3C022157 and MELO3C016529 were expressed at relatively higher levels, (Fig. 5) in the resistant accession. Such higher expression in response to A. citrulli in the resistant accession indicates the potential involvement of these R-genes in BFB resistance in melon.

Several comparative transcriptomic studies have been reported in melon [75,76,77], but few studies have focused exclusively on expression profiling of R-genes against phytopathogenic agents in melon. For example, RNA-seq assessment of the changes in transcript levels at different time points in Phytophthora capsici-inoculated tissues of resistant and susceptible melon genotypes provided a basis for identifying candidate resistant genes [78]. Comparative transcriptome analysis identified ten genes that were differentially expressed in resistant and susceptible cultivars of melon in response to powdery mildew [79]. In addition, a study of the MLO (mildew resistance locus o) gene family in melon revealed candidate genes that might play roles in susceptibility to powdery mildew [80]. In watermelon, six NBS-encoding R-genes were identified as candidates for gummy stem blight (GSB) resistance [81, 82]. Finally, markers have been developed for detecting both GSB and BFB resistance in melon based on the sequence polymorphism in the TIR-NBS-LRR gene MELO3C022157 [81, 83]. Notably, all six candidate R-genes identified in the current study have corresponding homologues in watermelon and cucumber (Fig. 3). The roles of these genes in BFB resistance in these two crops remain to be investigated.

Conclusions

We identified six putative candidate genes that might play roles in resistance to BFB in melon. This is the first report of candidate genes for BFB resistance in melon. Our findings provide a basis for further functional studies to validate the exact roles of these genes. In addition, causal sequence polymorphisms could be identified in these genes, leading to the development of markers for BFB resistance. Our findings will thus be useful for improving the BFB resistance trait in melon.

Methods

A. citrulli: collection, culture, and inoculum preparation

A. citrulli strain NIHHS15–280 was obtained from the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science (NIHHS), South Korea. The bacterium was cultured on Petri plates containing 20 ml King’s B (KB) medium supplemented with 100 μg ml− 1 ampicillin for 36–48 h at 28 °C [84] until bacterial colonies formed. For all inoculations, a bacterial suspension was prepared by covering the culture plates with 5 ml of sterile, double distilled (DD) water and gently scraping the surface of the KB medium using an L-shaped rubber spreader to an optical density (OD) of 1.0 at 600 nm, as measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer. The bacterial suspension was diluted to a final concentration of ~ 1 × 106 colony forming units (cfu) mL− 1.

Plant materials, growth conditions, and bioassays

The BFB-resistant (PI 353814) and -susceptible (PI 614596) melon accessions [74, 85] used in this study were obtained from the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System (https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/search.aspx), USDA, USA. The seeds were sown in a commercial nursery soil mixture in 32-cell trays and grown in a controlled plant growth chamber at 25 ± 2 °C, 16 h day length, relative humidity of 60%, and a light intensity of 440 μmoles/m2/s at bench level. After 3 weeks, the plants were transferred to a greenhouse.

Two weeks after germination, the plants were transferred to plastic pots and grown in a greenhouse at 24 ± 2 °C with a relative humidity of 90% where the plants were inoculated with A. citrulli. The resistance status of the accessions was reconfirmed via bioassay (Fig. 6) as previously reported with minor modifications [86]. Plants at the 3–5 true-leaf stage (4–5 weeks old) were sprayed with bacterial suspensions until runoff in a greenhouse at 22 ± 2 °C with a relative humidity of 96%. Plants were re-inoculated 3 d after the first inoculation to ensure that no plants had avoided inoculation and to eliminate false positives. Leaf samples from three biological replicates were collected at different time points (0 h, 12 h, 1 d, 3 d, and 6 d), immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80 °C for RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis.

Fig. 6
figure6

Disease symptoms in the leaves of susceptible (PI 614596) and resistant (PI 353814) melon accessions at 12 d after inoculation with A. citrulli. All leaves were detached from the plants immediately before they were photographed

Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

The melon leaves were ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen, and 100 mg of each sample with three biological replicates was subjected to total RNA extraction using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA with a SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System kit (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD).

Identification and in silico analysis of melon R-genes

Genomic information for all 70 R-genes, as reported in the improved assembly and annotated genome of melon [44], was retrieved from the cucurbit genomic database (http://cucurbitgenomics.org) (Additional file 1: Table S1). The genes were subjected to a series of in silico analyses such as exon–intron structure, motif distribution, domain organization, chromosomal mapping, and microsynteny analyses (for specific analytical tools, see the Results section).

Primer design and quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Gene-specific primers for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) were designed using Primer3Plus (https://primer3plus.com/cgibin/dev/primer3plus.cgi) (Table 1). The expression patterns of the R-genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR in a LightCycler® instrument (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions were performed in a 10 μL volume consisting of 5 μL of 2x qPCRBIO SyGreen Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems, London, UK), 5 pmol of primers, and cDNA template diluted to the appropriate concentrations. The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 3-step amplifications at 95 °C for 15 s, 56 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 20 s for 45 cycles. The mean expression levels of relevant genes were calculated by the 2–ΔΔ Ct method [87] using the average value of three reference genes [2, 8, 88] as internal control.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance tests were carried out using the normalized gene expression values with MINITAB17 software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). Tukey’s pairwise comparison test was employed to determine the mean separation of expression values. p values indicate statistically significant variations of expression.

Availability of data and materials

We declare that the dataset(s) supporting the conclusions of this article are encompassed within the article (and its additional file(s).

Abbreviations

A. citrulli :

Acidovorax citrulli

BFB:

Bacterial fruit blotch

R-genes:

Resistance genes

avr :

Avirulence

Fig:

Figure

Chr:

Chromosome

CDS:

Coding Sequence

bp:

Base pair

AA:

Amino Acid

LRR:

Leucine-rich repeat

NBS-LRR:

Nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat

TIR:

Toll/interleukin-1 receptor homology

TIR:

NBS-LRR- Toll/interleukin-1 receptor homology nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat

NB-ARC:

Nucleotide-binding adaptor shared by APAF-1, R proteins and CED-4

CC:

Coiled-coil domain

RLK:

Protein kinase

DUF:

Domain of unknown function

References

  1. 1.

    Garcia-Mas J, Benjak A, Sanseverino W, Bourgeois M, Mir G, González VM, Hénaff E, Câmara F, Cozzuto L, Lowy E. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). PNAS. 2012;109(29):11872–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kong Q, Gao L, Cao L, Liu Y, Saba H, Huang Y, Bie Z. Assessment of suitable reference genes for quantitative gene expression studies in melon fruits. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fita A, Bowen HC, Hayden RM, Nuez F, Pico B, Hammond JP. Diversity in expression of phosphorus (P) responsive genes in Cucumis melo L. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35387.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lester G, Eischen F. Beta-carotene content of postharvest orange-fleshed muskmelon fruit: effect of cultivar, growing location and fruit size. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 1996;49(3):191–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lester GE, Crosby KM. Ascorbic acid, folic acid, and potassium content in postharvest green-flesh honeydew muskmelons: influence of cultivar, fruit size, soil type, and year. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2002;127(5):843–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lester GE. Antioxidant, sugar, mineral, and phytonutrient concentrations across edible fruit tissues of orange-fleshed honeydew melon (Cucumis melo L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(10):3694–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mascarell-Creus A, Cañizares J, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Mora-García S, Blanca J, Gonzalez-Ibeas D, Saladié M, Roig C, Deleu W, Picó-Silvent B. An oligo-based microarray offers novel transcriptomic approaches for the analysis of pathogen resistance and fruit quality traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.). BMC Genomics. 2009;10(1):467.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kong Q, Yuan J, Niu P, Xie J, Jiang W, Huang Y, Bie Z. Screening suitable reference genes for normalization in reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR analysis in melon. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87197.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Sechler A, Claflin LE, Vidaver AK, Jones JB, Agarkova I, Ignatov A, Dickstein E, Ramundo BA. Reclassification of subspecies of Acidovorax avenae as A. avenae (Manns 1905) Emend., A. cattleyae (Pavarino, 1911) comb. nov., A. citrulli Schaad et al., 1978 comb. nov., and proposal of A. oryzae sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008;31(6–8):434–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Silva GM, Souza RM, Yan L, Júnior RS, Medeiros FH, Walcott RR. Strains of the group I lineage of Acidovorax citrulli, the causal agent of bacterial fruit blotch of cucurbitaceous crops, are predominant in Brazil. Phytopathology. 2016;106(12):1486–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Burdman S, Kots N, Kritzman G, Kopelowitz J. Molecular, physiological, and host-range characterization of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli isolates from watermelon and melon in Israel. Plant Dis. 2005;89(12):1339–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Burdman S, Walcott R. Acidovorax citrulli: generating basic and applied knowledge to tackle a global threat to the cucurbit industry. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13(8):805–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bahar O, Burdman S. Bacterial fruit blotch: a threat to the cucurbit industry. Isr J Plant Sci. 2010;58(1):19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Noh J, Kim J-H, Lim JH, Kim TB, Seong MH, Jung GT, Kim JM, Cheong S-S, Oh NK, Lee W-H. Occurrence of diseases and case of clinical diagnosis on watermelon in South Korea, 2008-2012. Res Plant Dis. 2014;20(1):8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    O'brien R, Martin H. Bacterial blotch of melons caused by strains of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Aust J Exp Agr. 1999;39(4):479–85.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Islam M, Hossain MR, Kim H-T, Jesse DMI, Abuyusuf M, Jung H-J, Park J-I, Nou I-S. Development of molecular markers for detection of Acidovorax citrulli strains causing bacterial fruit blotch disease in melon. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(11):2715.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Carvalho FC, Santos LA, Dias RC, Mariano RL, Souza EB. Selection of watermelon genotypes for resistance to bacterial fruit blotch. Euphytica. 2013;190(2):169–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Conceição CS, Felix KCS, Mariano RL, Medeiros EV, Souza EB. Combined effect of yeast and silicon on the control of bacterial fruit blotch in melon. Sci Hortic. 2014;174:164–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    de Melo EA, Rosa de Lima RM, Laranjeira D, dos Santos LA, de Omena Gusmão L, de Souza EB. Efficacy of yeast in the biocontrol of bacterial fruit blotch in melon plants. Trop Plant Pathol. 2015;40(1):56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schaad NW, Sowell G Jr, Goth R, Colwell R, Webb R. Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes subsp. citrulli subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1978;28(1):117–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hopkins D. The hypothetical exam question becomes reality. Plant Dis. 1995;79:761–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hopkins DL, Thompson CM, Hilgren J, Lovic B. Wet seed treatment with peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch and other seedborne diseases of watermelon. Plant Dis. 2003;87(12):1495–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stephens D, Schneider R, Walcott R, Johnson C. A procedure, based on exposure to chlorine gas, for disinfesting watermelon seeds. In: Phytopathology: 2008: Amer Phytopathological Soc 3340 Pilot Knob Road, St Paul, MN 55121 USA; 2008. p. S150–1.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Feng J, Li J, Randhawa P, Bonde M, Schaad NW. Evaluation of seed treatments for the eradication of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli from melon and watermelon seeds. Can J Plant Pathol. 2009;31(2):180–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wan H, Yuan W, Bo K, Shen J, Pang X, Chen J. Genome-wide analysis of NBS-encoding disease resistance genes in Cucumis sativus and phylogenetic study of NBS-encoding genes in Cucurbitaceae crops. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):109.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jones JD. Plant disease resistance genes: structure, function and evolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996;7(2):155–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    DeYoung BJ, Innes RW. Plant NBS-LRR proteins in pathogen sensing and host defense. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(12):1243.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dangl JL, Jones JD. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001;411(6839):826.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ellis J, Dodds P, Pryor T. Structure, function and evolution of plant disease resistance genes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000;3(4):278–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Harris CJ, Slootweg EJ, Goverse A, Baulcombe DC. Stepwise artificial evolution of a plant disease resistance gene. PNAS. 2013;110(52):21189–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Van Ooijen G, Mayr G, Kasiem MM, Albrecht M, Cornelissen BJ, Takken FL. Structure–function analysis of the NB-ARC domain of plant disease resistance proteins. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1383–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Qi D, DeYoung BJ, Innes RW. Structure-function analysis of the coiled-coil and leucine-rich repeat domains of the RPS5 disease resistance protein. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(4):1819–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    McHale L, Tan X, Koehl P, Michelmore RW. Plant NBS-LRR proteins: adaptable guards. Genome Biol. 2006;7(4):212.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nandety RS, Caplan JL, Cavanaugh K, Perroud B, Wroblewski T, Michelmore RW, Meyers BC. The role of TIR-NBS and TIR-X proteins in plant basal defense responses. Plant Physiol. 2013;162(3):1459–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wu Y, Zhou JM. Receptor-L ike kinases in plant innate immunity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2013;55(12):1271–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Guo S, Zhang J, Sun H, Salse J, Lucas WJ, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Mao L, Ren Y, Wang Z. The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions. Nat Genet. 2013;45(1):51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhou T, Wang Y, Chen J-Q, Araki H, Jing Z, Jiang K, Shen J, Tian D. Genome-wide identification of NBS genes in japonica rice reveals significant expansion of divergent non-TIR NBS-LRR genes. Mol Gen Genomics. 2004;271(4):402–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Monosi B, Wisser R, Pennill L, Hulbert S. Full-genome analysis of resistance gene homologues in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(7):1434–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lv S, Changwei Z, Tang J, Li Y, Wang Z, Jiang D, Hou X. Genome-wide analysis and identification of TIR-NBS-LRR genes in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) reveal expression patterns to TuMV infection. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;90:89–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Song W, Wang B, Li X, Wei J, Chen L, Zhang D, Zhang W, Li R. Identification of immune related LRR-containing genes in maize (Zea mays L.) by genome-wide sequence analysis. Int J Genomics. 2015;2015:231358.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bouktila D, Khalfallah Y, Habachi-Houimli Y, Mezghani-Khemakhem M, Makni M, Makni H. Large-scale analysis of NBS domain-encoding resistance gene analogs in Triticeae. Genet Mol Biol. 2014;37(3):598–610.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Meyers BC, Kozik A, Griego A, Kuang H, Michelmore RW. Genome-wide analysis of NBS-LRR–encoding genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15(4):809–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lee S-Y, Seo J-S, Rodriguez-Lanetty M, Lee D-H. Comparative analysis of superfamilies of NBS-encoding disease resistance gene analogs in cultivated and wild apple species. Mol Gen Genomics. 2003;269(1):101–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ruggieri V, Alexiou KG, Morata J, Argyris J, Pujol M, Yano R, Nonaka S, Ezura H, Latrasse D, Boualem A. An improved assembly and annotation of the melon (Cucumis melo L.) reference genome. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8088.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Natarajan S, Kim H-T, Thamilarasan SK, Veerappan K, Park J-I, Nou I-S. Whole genome re-sequencing and characterization of powdery mildew disease-associated allelic variation in melon. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157524.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ng A, Xavier RJ. Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins: integrators of pattern recognition and signaling in immunity. Autophagy. 2011;7(9):1082–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bai J, Pennill LA, Ning J, Lee SW, Ramalingam J, Webb CA, Zhao B, Sun Q, Nelson JC, Leach JE. Diversity in nucleotide binding site–leucine-rich repeat genes in cereals. Genome Res. 2002;12(12):1871–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jebanathirajah JA, Peri S, Pandey A. Toll and interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing proteins in plants: a genomic perspective. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7(9):388–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rairdan GJ, Collier SM, Sacco MA, Baldwin TT, Boettrich T, Moffett P. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling. Plant Cell. 2008;20(3):739–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Goff KE, Ramonell KM. The role and regulation of receptor-like kinases in plant defense. Gene Regul Syst Biol. 2007;1:117762500700100015.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T. FLS2: an LRR receptor–like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell. 2000;5(6):1003–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Shiu S-H, Bleecker AB. Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Sci STKE. 2001;2001(113):re22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gu Y, Innes RW. The KEEP ON GOING protein of Arabidopsis recruits the ENHANCED DISEASE RESISTANCE1 protein to trans-Golgi network/early endosome vesicles. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(4):1827–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yang Q, Niu X, Tian X, Zhang X, Cong J, Wang R, Zhang G, Li G. Comprehensive genomic analysis of the DUF4228 gene family in land plants and expression profiling of ATDUF4228 under abiotic stresses. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Slootweg E, Koropacka K, Roosien J, Dees R, Overmars H, Lankhorst RK, van Schaik C, Pomp R, Bouwman L, Helder J. Sequence exchange between homologous NB-LRR genes converts virus resistance into nematode resistance, and vice versa. Plant Physiol. 2017;175(1):498–510.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bonas U, Van den Ackerveken G. Gene-for-gene interactions: bacterial avirulence proteins specify plant disease resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2(1):94–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    van Leeuwen H, Garcia-Mas J, Coca M, Puigdoménech P, Monfort A. Analysis of the melon genome in regions encompassing TIR-NBS-LRR resistance genes. Mol Gen Genomics. 2005;273(3):240–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kourelis J, van der Hoorn RA. Defended to the nines: 25 years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function. Plant Cell. 2018;30(2):285–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Marone D, Russo MA, Laidò G, De Leonardis AM, Mastrangelo AM. Plant nucleotide binding site–leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes: active guardians in host defense responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(4):7302–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Van Leeuwen H, Monfort A, Zhang H-B, Puigdomènech P. Identification and characterisation of a melon genomic region containing a resistance gene cluster from a constructed BAC library. Microcolinearity between Cucumis melo and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003;51(5):703–18.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Garcia-Mas J, van Leeuwen H, Monfort A, de Vicente MC, Puigdomènech P, Arús P. Cloning and mapping of resistance gene homologues in melon. Plant Sci. 2001;161(1):165–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Büschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R, Simons G, Wolter M, Frijters A, van Daelen R, van der Lee T, Diergaarde P, Groenendijk J. The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell. 1997;88(5):695–705.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Loh Y-T, Martin GB. The disease-resistance gene Pto and the fenthion-sensitivity gene fen encode closely related functional protein kinases. PNAS. 1995;92(10):4181–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hulbert SH, Webb CA, Smith SM, Sun Q. Resistance gene complexes: evolution and utilization. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39(1):285–312.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wang Y, Tan J, Wu Z, VandenLangenberg K, Wehner TC, Wen C, Zheng X, Owens K, Thornton A, Bang HH. STAYGREEN, STAY HEALTHY: a loss-of-susceptibility mutation in the STAYGREEN gene provides durable, broad-spectrum disease resistances for over 50 years of US cucumber production. New Phytol. 2019;221(1):415–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kato T, Hatakeyama K, Fukino N, Matsumoto S. Fine mapping of the clubroot resistance gene CRb and development of a useful selectable marker in Brassica rapa. Breed.Sci. 2013;63(1):116–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Li L, Luo Y, Chen B, Xu K, Zhang F, Li H, Huang Q, Xiao X, Zhang T, Hu J. A genome-wide association study reveals new loci for resistance to clubroot disease in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1483.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Delourme R, Laperche A, Bouchet A-S, Jubault M, Paillard S, Manzanares-Dauleux M-J, Nesi N. Genes and quantitative trait loci mapping for major agronomic traits in Brassica napus L. In: The Brassica napus genome. In: Springer; 2018. p. 41–85.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    González VM, Aventín N, Centeno E, Puigdomènech P. Interspecific and intraspecific gene variability in a 1-Mb region containing the highest density of NBS-LRR genes found in the melon genome. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Lecoq H, Pitrat M:Effect on cucumber mosaic virus incidence of the cultivation of partially resistant muskmelon cultivars. In: IV Conference on recent Advances in Vegetable Virus Research 127: 1982; 1982: 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Oumouloud A, Arnedo-Andres MS, Gonzalez-Torres R, Alvarez JM. Development of molecular markers linked to the Fom-1 locus for resistance to Fusarium race 2 in melon. Euphytica. 2008;164(2):347–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Dogimont C, Chovelon V, Pauquet J, Boualem A, Bendahmane A. The V at locus encodes for a CC-NBS-LRR protein that confers resistance to Aphis gossypii infestation and A. gossypii-mediated virus resistance. Plant J. 2014;80(6):993–1004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wang Y-H, Choi W, Thomas CE, Dean RA. Cloning of disease-resistance homologues in end sequences of BAC clones linked to Fom-2, a gene conferring resistance to Fusarium wilt in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Genome. 2002;45(3):473–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Islam MR, Hossain MR, Kim H-T, Nath UK, Abuyusuf M, Jung H-J, Park J-I, Nou I-S. Molecular characterization of Acidovorax citrulli strain NIHHS15-280 causing bacterial fruit blotch disease in Korea and screening of resistance sources in melon. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2019;61(1):1–12.

  75. 75.

    Hong C, Wei-Ping K, Jun-Feng L. Comparative transcriptome analysis of powdery mildew resistance between two melon (Cucumis melo L) with different thickness Peel. BioRxiv. 2019;541391.

  76. 76.

    Polonio Á, Pineda M, Bautista R, Martínez-Cruz J, Pérez-Bueno ML, Barón M, Pérez-García A. RNA-seq analysis and fluorescence imaging of melon powdery mildew disease reveal an orchestrated reprogramming of host physiology. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7978.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Silvia Sebastiani M, Bagnaresi P, Sestili S, Biselli C, Zechini A, Orrù L, Cattivelli L, Ficcadenti N. Transcriptome analysis of the melon-Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 1.2 pathosystem in susceptible and resistant plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:362.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Wang P, Wu H, Zhao G, He Y, Kong W, Zhang J, Liu S, Liu M, Hu K, Liu L. Transcriptome analysis clarified genes involved in resistance to Phytophthora capsici in melon. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0227284.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zhu Q, Gao P, Wan Y, Cui H, Fan C, Liu S, Luan F. Comparative transcriptome profiling of genes and pathways related to resistance against powdery mildew in two contrasting melon genotypes. Sci Hortic. 2018;227:169–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Zhou S, Jing Z, Shi J. Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of the MLO gene family in Cucumis sativus. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12(4):6565–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Hassan M, Rahim M, Natarajan S, Robin A, Kim H-T, Park J-I, Nou I-S. Gummy stem blight resistance in melon: inheritance pattern and development of molecular markers. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):2914.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Whitham S, Dinesh-Kumar S, Choi D, Hehl R, Corr C, Baker B. The product of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: similarity to toll and the interleukin-1 receptor. Cell. 1994;78(6):1101–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Islam M, Hossain MR, Jesse DMI, Jung H-J, Kim H-T, Park J-I, Nou I-S. Development of Molecular Marker Linked with Bacterial Fruit Blotch Resistance in Melon (Cucumis melo L.). Genes. 2020;11(2):220.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Schaad N, Jones J, Chun W. Laboratory guide for the identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. Paul, MN: Amer Phytopathol. Soc; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wechter WP, Levi A, Ling K-S, Kousik C, Block CC. Identification of resistance to Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli among melon (Cucumis spp.) plant introductions. Hortscience. 2011;46(2):207–12.

    Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Bahar O, Kritzman G, Burdman S. Bacterial fruit blotch of melon: screens for disease tolerance and role of seed transmission in pathogenicity. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2009;123(1):71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Rachmawati Y, Daryono BS, Aristya GR. Molecular characters of melon (Cucumis melo L.“Tacapa”) in response to karst critical land. In: AIP Conference Proceedings: 2017: AIP Publishing LLC; 2017. p. 020030.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System, USA, Korean Agricultural Culture Collection, Korea, and National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Korea for providing the melon seeds and bacterial strains.

Funding

This study was supported by the Golden Seed Project (Grant No. 213007–05-4-CG100) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Republic of Korea.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.R.I. designed and conducted the entire experiment, DNA extraction, performed wet lab experiments, analyzed the qRT-PCR data, interpreted the results, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. D.M.I.J. helped with the in silico analysis, performed the bioinformatics analysis, and constructed the Figs. H.-J.J. assisted with the bioassay and PCR assays. M.R.H. comprehensively revised and finalized the manuscript. I.-S.N., H.-T.K. and J.-I.P. conceived and supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ill-Sup Nou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that this study conforms with the current laws of the countries in which the experiments were performed.

Consent for publication

All of the authors of this manuscript give their consent to publish the findings in BMC Genetics.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to publish in this journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Details of the primers designed for expression profiling of melon R-genes. Figure S1. Exon–intron structures of R-genes in melon genome-wide. Light red rectangles and black lines indicate exons and introns, respectively. Figure S2. Domain structures of the 70 R-genes in melon. The conserved domains were identified using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (CDD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi). Detailed descriptions of these domains are provided in Table 2. Specific domains in each protein are shown in the diagram. Figure S3. Gene expression profiles of resistant and susceptible melon accessions at different time points normalized to melon Actin expression (CmACT7, 149 bp), as determined by qRT-PCR analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M.R., Hossain, M.R., Jesse, D.M.I. et al. Characterization, identification and expression profiling of genome-wide R-genes in melon and their putative roles in bacterial fruit blotch resistance. BMC Genet 21, 80 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00885-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • BFB
  • Candidate gene
  • Expression
  • Resistance
  • Melon
  • NBS-LRR
  • qRT-PCR